Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Muriel, a handful of people are abusing the FF feature...

to get people they don't like two day suspensions.

I love DL, but it sucks to get those every couple of days just because we disagreed with someone.

And further people are using the blocked list feature to target people for two day suspensions.

Please disable that feature. I fear we will lose many good contributors if it keeps up.

Thank you!

by Anonymousreply 211August 21, 2025 12:06 AM

It is bad. It’s often being used by people who themselves are abusive They are downvoting people who challenge their name calling or bigoted posts. The best solution is not to temporarily ban anyone except in the most extreme cases.

by Anonymousreply 1August 17, 2025 12:44 AM

I'm shocked that no one FF'd me to get me suspended for posting this.

I'm not saying no one should ever be suspended or banned. I'm just saying it's clear that a few people have discovered that by giving a DL'er multiple FFs, they get banned automatically.

I'm suggesting do away with automatic bans that aren't vetted by a person.

by Anonymousreply 2August 17, 2025 3:02 AM

In general, there doesn't seem to be any need for it. Only if someone is being really offensive (e.g., using slurs) or posting so repetitively that it interferes with the board's function, should anyone be blocked.

To the extent people are just posting stupidity or just being offensive, the board can police itself. We can call people out for that. Yet, you see people rooting for people who disagreed with them or challenged their positions in a principled way to get banned. It's become a tool for people to protect their self esteem or to remain in their bubble.

by Anonymousreply 3August 17, 2025 3:09 AM

100% agree with you, OP.

by Anonymousreply 4August 17, 2025 3:11 AM

R4 thank you.

I expect find myself suspended tomorrow!

Last time it happened it was for a post in the ridiculous "Chinatown sucks" thread.

by Anonymousreply 5August 17, 2025 3:16 AM

There are people on both sides of sensitive issues doing it. Pro-trans and anti-trans. Pro-Israel and anti-Israel. Then those people claim only the other side is doing it, which is not true.

by Anonymousreply 6August 17, 2025 3:19 AM

I see a lot of posts I consider to be idiotic or unpleasant, but I very rarely see a post that I think warrants a suspension. We can all skip over the posts of the stupid and unpleasant people. It's just become a tool to insulate people from criticism or challenge.

by Anonymousreply 7August 17, 2025 3:22 AM

The website has attracted a lot of nastier posters in the last 10 years, maybe longer. We used to be a community. People didn’t go on the attack like they do now when they differ in opinion. People were “fun bitchy” with each other, not “mean bitchy.” Surely the people who run the website see this.

by Anonymousreply 8August 17, 2025 3:27 AM

R6 its not just people on divisive issues.

I've been banned for disagreeing over a movie. Its WAY out of hand.

by Anonymousreply 9August 17, 2025 3:28 AM

But, even if people are nastier, who cares? If you post, you should expect that people will criticize or challenge your position, and we are all free to call out the people who are being truly nasty for no reason at all---and people usually do. It's naturally self-policing. I don't want a small minority of people making that decision for the whole board, usually based on the fact that they have been called out on their stupidity or bigotry.

by Anonymousreply 10August 17, 2025 3:30 AM

I was timed out for participation in the condi troll threads. Ha! I deserved it. 😂

by Anonymousreply 11August 17, 2025 3:33 AM

Oh honey, the truly good posters left DL a long time ago, back when it became possible to track who made which posts. People who really had something to say but needed to be discreet left in [italic]droves.[/italic]

And those folks ain't never comin' back.

by Anonymousreply 12August 17, 2025 3:37 AM

[quote] People who really had something to say but needed to be discreet left in droves.

I recall the day Trolldar was introduced. It became so slow and quiet.

by Anonymousreply 13August 17, 2025 3:43 AM

How do you know when you’re banned? Is it when you get the notification that you’re not allowed to post at this time? Because I usually just log back in when I get that message and then I can post.

by Anonymousreply 14August 17, 2025 3:45 AM

R9 did you say anything critical of Miss Faye Dunaway? 'cause that's a big no-no round here!

by Anonymousreply 15August 17, 2025 3:50 AM

[quote]I'm shocked that no one FF'd me to get me suspended for posting this.

The night is young.

But I do agree with the OP.

by Anonymousreply 16August 17, 2025 3:52 AM

R14, that’s a different situation. Occasionally, the site requires me to login again, and until I do, it shows the no post allowed message. If you click on Account, it will show you if you are currently logged in or not. If you are logged in and you are getting the no post message then you’re the victim of someone’s attack on you.

by Anonymousreply 17August 17, 2025 3:52 AM

I thought I was the only one this was happening to. It never happened to me until recently.

by Anonymousreply 18August 17, 2025 3:54 AM

Ok thank you R17

by Anonymousreply 19August 17, 2025 3:54 AM

[quote] Ok thank you

Oh fank you. You fixted my Datalounge.

by Anonymousreply 20August 17, 2025 3:56 AM

Saturday night FF

by Anonymousreply 21August 17, 2025 4:28 AM

Vivian Vance isn't all that.

by Anonymousreply 22August 17, 2025 5:08 AM

I've had notifications of WWs on posts I made over a year ago. Does that mean I can be FFed into 48 hours of oblivion for some random post supporting Kamala Harris?

by Anonymousreply 23August 17, 2025 5:10 AM

More than a handful

by Anonymousreply 24August 17, 2025 5:28 AM

Gay on gay violence is NOT who we are.

[bold]#StopTheBanning[/bold]

(unless it’s of those stupid Tranny Panic losers)

by Anonymousreply 25August 17, 2025 6:28 AM

You're part of the problem, r25, if you support banning of the "trans panic" people. We all know that means people who don't agree with you on that issue. There should be no banning related to pro or anti-T issues, period. This is a forum for gay men to discuss the topics of the day and get bitchy.

by Anonymousreply 26August 17, 2025 6:39 AM

Lesbians are fine, too. Point is, it's gay and bitchy. Don't ban people for voicing opinions on trans issues that you don't like.

by Anonymousreply 27August 17, 2025 6:47 AM

R26 has just admitted to being the problem.

by Anonymousreply 28August 17, 2025 6:48 AM

Now r26 will FF me

by Anonymousreply 29August 17, 2025 6:50 AM

r28, you didn't even read my comment at r26 if you think I admitted to being part of the problem. It's the insane pro-trans and anti-trans that FF everyone that is part of the problem. r25 basically outed itself as one of those. And if you're FF, it's not because of me.

by Anonymousreply 30August 17, 2025 8:14 AM

What would “insane pro-trans” even look like, r30? Most of us just want them left peaceably alone.

by Anonymousreply 31August 17, 2025 11:02 AM

Agree with OP. This F&F abuse has gotten totally out of hand. The F&F feature should be removed and red tags brought back.

Right now a lot of us paid up members of DL are regularly unable to use the site due to timeouts.

by Anonymousreply 32August 17, 2025 11:44 AM

[quote]The website has attracted a lot of nastier posters in the last 10 years, maybe longer. We used to be a community. People didn’t go on the attack like they do now when they differ in opinion. People were “fun bitchy” with each other, not “mean bitchy.”

Society as a whole has become a lot nastier in the past decade - without a doubt due to Trump making it acceptable and emboldening people to be more nasty and the crazed after effects of the pandemic which left a lot of people completely unhinged and nasty.

by Anonymousreply 33August 17, 2025 12:02 PM

There was a whole long thread on this last week, full of kerfuffle. I even got another 2 day time out within it, for zero cause, and now think it’s clear enough who did it. Link below.

Summary of that thread: It’s happening to dozens and dozens of us. There are indeed some bad actors whose hobby is anonymously banning people on Datalounge. And Muriel is the 1 person who founded Datalounge and clearly does not want or care to end up babysitting this joint with trolldar like in the days of old.

So it’s F&F, and in some cases the ban is indeed deserved. And in many other cases bad actors ban you outright for saying their fave celeb is overrated… or for being on the other side of a divisive issue… or (in my case) they develop a weird animosity and they stalk/monitor you to get you banned on the regular… or they do it just ‘cause they decided they feel like banning you and they can.

Otherwise F&F goes away and truly ugly shit quickly infests this place.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34August 17, 2025 12:13 PM

If anything, Datalounge is far tamer now. During the Bush Administration and the Clinton/Obama nomination battle, there were genuine differences of opinion. On the Broadway threads, there were people who knew their stuff and did not suffer fools. When TV shows was king, people disagreed about Mad Men, Six Feet Under, and even Battlestar Galactica.. It moved fast and often got vicious.

Society - in its various silos - now sees disagreement in moral terms. If someone doesn’t agree, they either need to be educated or called out. Which isn’t astonishing because of how disgusting the Republican party has been since Reagan and especially the Gingrich era.

by Anonymousreply 36August 17, 2025 12:14 PM

I had a two day ban recently for the first time and have no idea why.

I didn’t even know that you can ban someone by pressing the ff symbol. I have to admit I’ve pressed it a few times by mistake when I’ve meant to press WW, usually when I’m posting from my phone. Apologies if I’ve inadvertently contributed to a ban.

by Anonymousreply 37August 17, 2025 12:29 PM

While I agree with the OP, unfortunately threads like this just inform the people doing it that their tactics are working and DL will do nothing anyway.

by Anonymousreply 38August 17, 2025 12:50 PM

In general, the board seems too tame. There are some people who are nasty just for the sake of being nasty, which is unfortunate, but we can live with it. On the other han, a lot of ignorant and sometimes chauvinistic and bigoted stuff gets posted without challenge

by Anonymousreply 39August 17, 2025 1:24 PM

Well, I’m not here kink shame.

by Anonymousreply 41August 17, 2025 1:34 PM

I’m so naive that when I got a 2 day ban just over a week ago, I thought it was some internet glitch. Not because of something I posted in a current Dangling Tendrils thread or maybe it was in an Orange Menace thread.

Really Muriel, can’t you just have a tab for f&f like you do for w&w?

by Anonymousreply 42August 17, 2025 1:35 PM

Why in the fuck is R40 greyed out? I've got my settings on asbestos eyeballs so he must have been given multiple F&Fs for that post. Inexplicable.

by Anonymousreply 43August 17, 2025 1:42 PM

[quote] Why in the fuck is [R40] greyed out?

There’s nothing wrong with what r40 posted. It’s a good example of people being FF’d for no reason. Considering that at this moment it’s showing that it was posted 14 minutes ago, someone is targeting that person.

by Anonymousreply 44August 17, 2025 1:46 PM

[quote]... the ff symbol. I have to admit I’ve pressed it a few times by mistake when I’ve meant to press WW, usually when I’m posting from my phone.

I agree, R37, the placement of WW alongside FF might be contributing to the problem. Maybe we need an "are you sure?" prompt after clicking (deliberately or not) FF.

by Anonymousreply 45August 17, 2025 1:50 PM

R40 has gone back to normal now. I gave it a W&W so maybe that balanced out the F&Fs. See? What a mess.

by Anonymousreply 46August 17, 2025 1:51 PM

R14 you're just suddenly unable to post. No notification or anything. And it always lasts 48 hours.

by Anonymousreply 47August 17, 2025 2:00 PM

It happened to me on Thursday for 12 hours and then again on Saturday for 24+ hours. One was for a comment challenging the truthfulness of a pro-Israel poster (12 hours) and the other for challenging the truthfulness of an anti-trans poster (24+ hours). Neither responded but I was banned/unable to post within minutes of making those posts so I am very sure they were the post that got me the timeouts.

I'll take screenshots for everyone of the message you see when you receive a time out. I'm sure my next time out will be just moments away - probably for this post.

The F&F button is being used as censorship with the aim being that the Israel/IDF propagandists and the anti-trans crowd (often the same people according to ignoredar) can post whatever madeup drivel they want on DL and everyone will be too scared to challenge their troll garbage because they will give you an F&F time out. That's a fucking fact.

by Anonymousreply 48August 17, 2025 2:30 PM

[quote]Vivian Vance isn't all that. —Will I be FF'd now?

FF? That will get you the death penalty.

by Anonymousreply 49August 17, 2025 2:50 PM

[quote] Muriel, a handful of people are abusing the FF feature...

AND they've been passing notes!

by Anonymousreply 50August 17, 2025 2:53 PM

R48, bullshit at your attempt to act like it is one sided. The anti-Israel and Trans rights defenders often FF others in an attempt to silence to their opposition, and give their own comments an absurd number of WW as well. Both sides on those sensitive issues do this and it needs to stop. And THAT is the fucking fact.

by Anonymousreply 51August 17, 2025 3:34 PM

I truly like DL. But I wish it would be modernized every now and then. In order to make (or not lose) money, I'd propose to make it harder to troll because I think the trolling is what makes DL frustrating if not toxic. My proposal: Mandatory profile set up with user name. WW only, no FF. Flagging inappropriate posts only from users who have a relatively high number of WW-posts already to weed out sock puppet trolls.

Thoughts?

by Anonymousreply 52August 17, 2025 3:41 PM

Is trolling such a real problem here? And what do you consider trolling? You could just as easily argue that people get away with too much bigotry and stupidity without challenge and that the board should be more confrontational.

by Anonymousreply 53August 17, 2025 3:51 PM

My “fan” couldn’t beg her way out of a paper bag. Something cheap about this thread.

by Anonymousreply 54August 17, 2025 3:54 PM

r55 I don't FF people, but you do sound like you have rage issues

by Anonymousreply 57August 17, 2025 4:01 PM

This has been a problem it seems in that someone with a [italic]heavily[/italic] invested political identity, silences ANY criticism of the Democratic party/politicians as a personal attack ("treason").

by Anonymousreply 58August 17, 2025 4:01 PM

r59 I really do hope things improve for you. This place can be fun - don't let it get under your skin that much.

by Anonymousreply 60August 17, 2025 4:05 PM

Lumpen.

by Anonymousreply 61August 17, 2025 4:06 PM

I wish we had an "undo" button like on Manvox.

by Anonymousreply 62August 17, 2025 4:07 PM

It's easier just to block people like R55.

by Anonymousreply 63August 17, 2025 4:12 PM

I think we definitely have a lot more truly nasty trolls here than in the past. Perhaps mentally ill ones.

I posted in a sabrina carpenter thread and said her looks were bizarre to me and i wasn't sure why she was famous and some unhinged troll started shrieking that I was a liar and I always lie about everything. Say what? That screams mental issues.

by Anonymousreply 64August 17, 2025 4:13 PM

I feel like if you FF a lot yourself it also gets you a timeout I can’t figure out why I get timed out when I barely post at times, but will FF trolls as I scroll.

by Anonymousreply 65August 17, 2025 4:24 PM

R42: I had a similar experience recently but had no idea I was (apparently) on a time-out. No idea what I said that was offensive as I’m pretty mild. Maybe a bitch sometimes but not more than that. Confusing.

by Anonymousreply 66August 17, 2025 4:33 PM

I already 55/59 on block. I only have about 8 people on block, and I suspect at least two of them have alts, you can just tell by their writing and type of posts. It’s very unfortunate that so many people are being put on time-outs, even the barely visited Reddit site has multiple posts on the topic.

by Anonymousreply 67August 17, 2025 4:40 PM

Oh one last agreement from up thread: I 100% use.DL on my phone and it’s impossible to WW a thread without FFing a thread. It makes me not want to WW because I’m afraid I’ll be FFing at the same time.

by Anonymousreply 68August 17, 2025 4:43 PM

Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration.

by Anonymousreply 69August 17, 2025 4:45 PM

FEAR is a four letter word!

by Anonymousreply 70August 17, 2025 4:47 PM

Not sure where to ask this, but has the yearly subscription offer been cancelled? Looks like its only a monthly thing now...?

by Anonymousreply 71August 17, 2025 4:48 PM

Looks that way r71. Which is a bit of a pain in the ass for me. I won't use a credit card here so I pay by gift card

by Anonymousreply 72August 17, 2025 4:53 PM

I hardly ever use the FF feature. I didn't even know what it meant until recently. Once in a while I will now FF a very racist thread by some crazy person. That's it. I've been in time out several times the past few weeks, so I can assure you it's not from using the FF button too much.

Usually criticizing any politician who the OP thinks is the second coming will get you banned, now.

by Anonymousreply 73August 17, 2025 4:54 PM

No soup for you!

by Anonymousreply 74August 17, 2025 5:10 PM

I blocked someone for being nasty early in this thread, now I see a lot of people calling out someone whose posts I can’t see. Likely the same awful troll posting everything offensive.

by Anonymousreply 75August 17, 2025 5:16 PM

They ending the cunts, rejecting the trolls. They’re canceling the Datalounge elder gays who live here.

by Anonymousreply 76August 17, 2025 5:17 PM

R76, the call is coming from inside the house!!

by Anonymousreply 77August 17, 2025 5:43 PM

Dump a bucket of pigs blood on the trolls instead of FFing!

by Anonymousreply 78August 17, 2025 5:47 PM

I was banned again, this time by the OP of the thread where an AI generated fat girl jumps off a boat. I said you should be FFd for posting AI slop, I wasn't being completely serious. I was banned immediately after he replied to me that I would be banned.

by Anonymousreply 79August 18, 2025 1:42 PM

R79, I saw that and, while I actually agree with you about AI slop, you went after the OP over and over and over like a pitbull.

by Anonymousreply 80August 18, 2025 1:53 PM

r80 no i didn't, i only had one comment in that entire thread.

by Anonymousreply 81August 18, 2025 1:55 PM

[quote] I saw that and, while I actually agree with you about AI slop, you went after the OP over and over and over like a pitbull.

I just looked up that thread and saw the same thing and was going to comment that.

I can’t find fault when someone says someone else should be banned and then it boomerangs.

by Anonymousreply 83August 18, 2025 1:56 PM

He said the other poster should be banned?

by Anonymousreply 84August 18, 2025 1:58 PM

I said you should get banned for posting AI slop. that was my only comment in the thread. all the other attacks at the retarded OP were other people. He responded "you should be banned for being an asshole", and I was immediately banned.

by Anonymousreply 85August 18, 2025 1:59 PM

I believe this is the thread, if people want to validate.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 86August 18, 2025 2:06 PM

R85. I don't think the ban function should be used at all, except in very exceptional circumstances, but I think you do forfeit your right to complain if you have even suggested someone else should be banned.

by Anonymousreply 87August 18, 2025 2:09 PM

I've been under 48 hour FF-related bans twice in the past two or three months: Once by Trump-bots (I refuse to believe we have that many genuine posters who love Trump) for saying something especially nasty about Glorious Leader. Once by the maiden aunt Meghan Markle hating brigade, which I do think is made up of genuine racist, misogynist, classist old biddies of which we have droves.

Watch as I get redlined and banned for that last sentence!

by Anonymousreply 88August 18, 2025 2:21 PM

You’re outta here!

by Anonymousreply 89August 18, 2025 2:43 PM

I think it’s possible that when people believe they got a time out for a specific reply, it may not have been for that reply. With the example above for the AI fat woman, everyone can check the thread and see and validate that the comment in question has the strikethrough. Some of the other claims on this thread I’m not so sure about. If people would like to post the thread and reply number, we can check to see if it’s marked or not.

by Anonymousreply 90August 18, 2025 2:57 PM

I don't know how people can tell they were banned for one or two specific comments, if they post regularly.

by Anonymousreply 91August 18, 2025 3:12 PM

The people doing the FFing are crazy. In most cases. Like the people who argue on threads about certain English YA TV shows based on certain YA graphic novels. And when you give crazy people the ability to do this to other, rational people, they will.

by Anonymousreply 92August 18, 2025 3:20 PM

[quote]And when you give crazy people the ability to do this to other, rational people, they will.

This is the core of the matter.

by Anonymousreply 93August 18, 2025 3:24 PM

The FF and Ignore buttons don't even work half the time. I can't count how many racist trolls I've ignored a dozen times, but who are still visible every time I come back to the thread. Muriel is a fucking whore, and she sucks at her job.

I'm always put on a 48-hour timeout any time I defend THE TRANZ or mock Meghan Markle. So, as a result, I no longer touch those threads with a ten-foot dildo.

by Anonymousreply 94August 18, 2025 3:29 PM

R91 because it comes out of nowhere. Actually, it had had happened to me where one person gets snippy all out of proportion. You can back off and say WTF, but then you come back later and it’s a sudden time out. They look for a fight a pick, pick, pick.

by Anonymousreply 95August 18, 2025 3:37 PM

has* happened

by Anonymousreply 96August 18, 2025 3:37 PM

I highly doubt there's a "Muriel" in the assumed sense any longer. It's a site that hasn't really been updated in 10+ years and it's operating based on the formula (subscriptions) - (maintenance), with the goal of keeping the maintenance amount close to zero. No actual human is really monitoring it and auto-moderation, which is the cheapest way to do it, is easily gamed and deeply flawed. Even Reddit, with all of its problems, handles it better.

by Anonymousreply 97August 18, 2025 4:04 PM

R79 / R81, if you posted only once, my apologies, it all read like you were the same person as the “pitbull.”

I know others do that game with the Ignore feature to trace a poster’s total history but I can never be bothered. Again my apologies.

by Anonymousreply 98August 18, 2025 4:08 PM

[quote]R94 The FF and Ignore buttons don't even work half the time. I can't count how many racist trolls I've ignored... [italic][bold]Muriel is a fucking whore, and she sucks at her job.[/bold][/italic]

You are dancing VERY close to the flame, young lady!

by Anonymousreply 99August 18, 2025 4:22 PM

The FF Button should only be enabled for paying customers. That should cut out some of this spiteful misuse of the FF button.

by Anonymousreply 100August 18, 2025 4:34 PM

It only works for paying members. Prime Time is 24-7. Non - members can do nothing but scroll/read.

by Anonymousreply 101August 18, 2025 4:36 PM

I did not know that. Thanks.

by Anonymousreply 102August 18, 2025 4:41 PM

[quote] [R76], the call is coming from inside the house!!

Wouldn't be funny if it was actually Muriel who was behind these time outs. I don't think it is but if it was it would be hilarious.

by Anonymousreply 103August 18, 2025 4:45 PM

I'm not laughing, was banned three times last week

by Anonymousreply 104August 18, 2025 5:42 PM

r104 I don't see a reason for FFs/banned, but you do seem quite unstable.

by Anonymousreply 105August 18, 2025 5:47 PM

how so?

by Anonymousreply 106August 18, 2025 5:57 PM

[quote] Non - members can do nothing but scroll/read.

I didn't know that had changed. Didn't they used to be able to post at certain times?

by Anonymousreply 107August 18, 2025 6:33 PM

It’s been PT all time for a very long while now. Why do you think people are talking about the time outs? Because you can never post as a non - member…duh.

by Anonymousreply 108August 18, 2025 6:35 PM

I see, news

by Anonymousreply 109August 18, 2025 7:19 PM

R108 Just a suggestion--maybe if you didn't say things like "duh" to people and be such a superior asshole, generally, you probably wouldn't get as many FFs from other posters.

by Anonymousreply 110August 18, 2025 7:39 PM

A suggestion—don’t telegraph your own passive-aggressiveness via “suggestions.” That will get you innmuch deeper trouble.

by Anonymousreply 111August 18, 2025 7:43 PM

People have certainly been much more unjustifiably rude around here the last few years.

by Anonymousreply 112August 18, 2025 7:50 PM

I'm an occasional subscriber and was suspended for 24 hours on Saturday. Not sure why, but I guess it was my post about Adam Schiff where the first reply called me ignorant and lazy, and I in turn called him an asshole. I immediately cancelled my subscription. I made a flurry of posts last week that received little or no interest and were quickly buried. I might lurk here sometimes, but I'll never subscribe again.

by Anonymousreply 113August 18, 2025 8:20 PM

You’ll never comment again! ;)

by Anonymousreply 114August 18, 2025 8:23 PM

Hold me, David!

by Anonymousreply 115August 18, 2025 8:36 PM

It's really out of control. I've been here over 5 years and was only recently the recipient of two time outs, back to back. I'm still not really sure what it was. I think one was from the BEARKING half wits, who i am sure to insult when they add that "word" to an OP title (IT'S NOT FUNNY OR WITTY) , or Meghan/Harry sycophants.

by Anonymousreply 116August 18, 2025 8:43 PM

I’ve been barred from posting a few times in the past year or so, and it generally coincides with my having said something marginally supportive of trans or telling Harry / Megan racist klan grannies to get a life.

by Anonymousreply 117August 18, 2025 8:51 PM

I avoid the trans and the Harry/Megan threads and don't bother to get in back and forth with people who disagree with me, why bother I am not going to change their point of view and don't even engage when when people call me a dumb cunt, like I care about their opinion and I still get time outs. Usually happens when I say something negative about Trump.

by Anonymousreply 118August 18, 2025 9:30 PM

Is there a place on our account where we can see for how long we are suspended?

by Anonymousreply 119August 18, 2025 9:39 PM

R119, I’ve only seen that feature on Manvox. It’s called the Timeout Counter.

by Anonymousreply 120August 18, 2025 9:40 PM

r120 Re: Manvox. Give it up, sweetheart.

by Anonymousreply 121August 18, 2025 9:50 PM

[quote] Usually happens when I say something negative about Trump.

Nailed it.

The same Trump diaper-eaters who invented the "Cancel Culture" complaint love to cancel anybody who sees that ignorant, grifting asshole for what he is, and extension, they are.

by Anonymousreply 122August 18, 2025 10:58 PM

Oh, come on. There are thousands and thousands of negative c/omments about Trump. Threads upon threads. You think those people are all getting time outs? You're more likely to get FF'ed for saying something to the left of center.

by Anonymousreply 123August 18, 2025 11:37 PM

[quote] Oh, come on. There are thousands and thousands of negative c/omments about Trump. Threads upon threads.

I’ve been meaning to write something similar. It’s seems very far-fetched that a reply that just criticizes Trump would be flamed. I think it’s an example of people imagining incorrectly which reply of theirs got struck through. On the other hand, if they would do like the person who posted the AI fat person thread did and give us the thread and reply, it could be verified for sure.

by Anonymousreply 124August 19, 2025 12:18 AM

I’ve been the unlucky recipient then

by Anonymousreply 125August 19, 2025 1:02 AM

I didn’t know that prime time was 24-7. I just assumed that many of the loon posts were non paying trolls.

by Anonymousreply 126August 19, 2025 6:13 AM

It has been for years now R126. At least 2 years it feels like but maybe someone knows exactly how long better than I do.

by Anonymousreply 127August 19, 2025 7:48 AM

I’ve been a paying member since then so didn’t know

by Anonymousreply 128August 19, 2025 12:01 PM

The site sucked when there was limited prime time. Thats why I got a membership

by Anonymousreply 129August 19, 2025 12:06 PM

If non-members could FF? I shudder to think!

by Anonymousreply 130August 19, 2025 12:11 PM

Got a time out ban yesterday but only for 2 hours. WTF. Is there a rhyme or reason to this shite? These bans are like Dump's tariffs. On again off again. Totally erratic and arbitrary. Ultimately useless.

by Anonymousreply 131August 19, 2025 2:42 PM

Right, i had that last week too

by Anonymousreply 132August 19, 2025 2:54 PM

Yesterday I tried to add a link to a instagram profile to my post and I couldn’t post it. The button was grayed out-but I was able to post without a link.

Is this a version of a time out, or a bug?

by Anonymousreply 133August 19, 2025 4:32 PM

It's v8fairy who is doing this.

by Anonymousreply 134August 19, 2025 4:36 PM

[quote] Yesterday I tried to add a link to a instagram profile to my post and I couldn’t post it. The button was grayed out-but I was able to post without a link.

There are sites that this site won’t accept in the Web Site Link box.

by Anonymousreply 135August 19, 2025 4:38 PM

It’s a wing and a prayer when you hit link!

by Anonymousreply 136August 19, 2025 5:22 PM

r133 That's not a timeout. Every once in a while certain URLs won't post.

by Anonymousreply 137August 19, 2025 5:25 PM

IOW: it’s a bug

by Anonymousreply 138August 19, 2025 5:26 PM

It’s a feature!

by Anonymousreply 139August 19, 2025 5:27 PM

r138 Yes, I think we understand now, dear.

by Anonymousreply 140August 19, 2025 5:28 PM

Then tell folks no need to keep asking, Deer.

by Anonymousreply 141August 19, 2025 5:28 PM

Go tell it on the mountain !

by Anonymousreply 142August 19, 2025 5:31 PM

[quote]Yesterday I tried to add a link to a instagram profile to my post and I couldn’t post it. The button was grayed out-but I was able to post without a link.

Insta links always go through, I haven't seen anyone ever mentioning that they don't.

by Anonymousreply 143August 19, 2025 6:11 PM

Alright, I used a packet capture tool to inspect the packets that are downloaded when you visit this website. The packets don't tell the full story but they do tell you several things that are otherwise hidden from view, including the total number of FFs/dislikes every post on every thread receives. The person who is receiving the FF/dislike can also see the UUID of the person who has FF'd/disliked them if they use a packet capture tool.

v8fairy is indeed the poster who is brigading folks and getting them timed out. He appears to have exactly 7 accounts that he is using to do this. He is also brigading the "I was banned twice this week" thread.

Lots more to share but I am at work so I will need to come back to this tonight with the receipts. Assuming I do not get a time out before then. (But I dare you to try it, v8fairy, because the jig is up and I can see exactly what you are doing.)

by Anonymousreply 144August 19, 2025 6:54 PM

Packets? What are they packets? My Precious?

by Anonymousreply 145August 19, 2025 7:17 PM

Thanks, R144!

I'm glad there's someone here who knows how to do some due diligence.

by Anonymousreply 146August 19, 2025 7:23 PM

Wow, thanks. A Good Samaritan

by Anonymousreply 147August 19, 2025 8:14 PM

I love seeing the receipts!

by Anonymousreply 148August 19, 2025 8:17 PM

I find that sometimes I can't post links when the site address exceeds a certain length.

by Anonymousreply 149August 19, 2025 8:20 PM

Yes—^^

For instance, you cannot link standard Google search results to shame a slow reader.

by Anonymousreply 150August 19, 2025 8:45 PM

Or a map result

by Anonymousreply 151August 19, 2025 8:46 PM

7 accounts? Who has the time? I just come here for the occasional news nuggets, to complain about Trump/GOP, and have a few cheap laughs.

by Anonymousreply 152August 19, 2025 11:11 PM

Both the anti-TRANZ Troll and the Meghan Markle Troll have at least seven sock puppet accounts apiece. They wage a full-time war of FF’ing any miscreant into a time out.

They’re cheap to set up, and even a person on disability can afford it.

by Anonymousreply 153August 20, 2025 12:03 AM

Packets of what? Sachets?

by Anonymousreply 154August 20, 2025 12:23 AM

There is no evidence that anti-trans posters are brigading other posters, R153. Zero, zilch, nada.

There is, however, a fair amount of evidence that the pro-trans posters are doing that.

by Anonymousreply 155August 20, 2025 12:45 AM

I never post on either thread. I was banned three times last week

by Anonymousreply 156August 20, 2025 1:47 AM

It's time to hood swarm V8Fairy

by Anonymousreply 157August 20, 2025 1:52 AM

R157 = Miss Schuester

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158August 20, 2025 1:58 AM

You post racist shit all the time, Philly Snoop. You probably deserved your bans.

by Anonymousreply 159August 20, 2025 2:20 AM

No, i don’t. You’re full of shit. Ban me if you want. I’ve been here decades longer than you

by Anonymousreply 160August 20, 2025 2:57 AM

The only times I have been banned was by the crazy British old ladies or the "drop the T" agenda-driven posters.

by Anonymousreply 161August 20, 2025 6:32 AM

I have posted twice on this thread R37 and R126 and both of my posts have disappeared for me, why would that be?

My first post I mentioned that I might have occasionally pressed the ff button by mistake on my mobile when I meant to press the ww button. My second post I mentioned that I had no idea that these days only paying members could post.

Does this mean that people have pressed the ff button? Surely there wasn’t anything offensive in what I said.

by Anonymousreply 162August 20, 2025 7:09 AM

Sure Jan

by Anonymousreply 163August 20, 2025 7:27 AM

r162, using Chrome's DevTools, I see that you have no FFs on both r37 and r126, and both replies are visible. Have you Ignored yourself?

by Anonymousreply 164August 20, 2025 7:36 AM

R164 thank you, that’s exactly what I had done. I had no idea you could ignore yourself.

by Anonymousreply 165August 20, 2025 7:51 AM

I've been doing it all my life, r165.

by Anonymousreply 166August 20, 2025 7:53 AM

I agree and I posted about it in another thread. I've received a few 24 - 48 hour bans and it's always after I've posted in some of the more controversial threads, which I won't name here, because I don't want to ignite discussion about them!

But I'm not abusive, I've just had differences of opinion with a few people in one thread and then - bam - can't post anymore.

I think the issue is the auto ban feature is probably too simplistic. For example, I've been a member for a good while and, according to my profile, I've received nearly 12,000 WW votes - which is pretty clear evidence I'm not a troll. So you would think I'd need to get a LOT of FF votes in a short space of time to warrant getting an auto ban, yet I feel the same criteria is applied to everyone regardless of account history.

by Anonymousreply 167August 20, 2025 8:04 AM

I freely admit to FFing the UK Kkklan Granny types. They only post on Royals threads and abuse the liberal posting regulations here because they were banned from other sites. It's happened here before with other groups. I could name them .

Also any time I see "drop the T" I ff. My opinion of transgendered is complex and I refuse to be bullied into a stance by an agenda-driven group that tried to make a foothold here in 2015

by Anonymousreply 168August 20, 2025 8:05 AM

I've received 45,501 w&w votes as of this morning. I was banned on and off for over 100 hours, or more than four days, over the last week.

My most recent ban happened on Monday morning, after one post I made about being banned for 48 hours over the weekend. Banned again within 2 minutes. There's no way that that's happening normally. Someone is clearly gaming something, and it's so instantaneous it can't be happening without some form of cheating. There are not 500 posters hitting f&f at once and banning someone over exactly one post [italic]about being banned[/italic].

I wonder how long I'll be banned for this post.

A handful of the worst posters are targeting and taking down the best posters. That's why the quality has gone down so much in the last few years. They're turning it into MAGA/"LGB"/BRF/Hasbara-Lounge

by Anonymousreply 169August 20, 2025 11:48 AM

[quote]My most recent ban happened on Monday morning, after one post I made about being banned for 48 hours over the weekend.

What thread was it?

by Anonymousreply 170August 20, 2025 11:55 AM

R67" I won't name here, because I don't want to ignite discussion about them!"

Fraus are not here to "discuss" dear.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 171August 20, 2025 12:42 PM

Each" side " accuses the other side of doing what they are guilty of doing. Banning. Trumpian projection alive and well on DL.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172August 20, 2025 12:46 PM

Let’s not forget the subreddit devoted to DL stalking and judgment. It’s run mostly by perma-banned DL freaks who’ll tell you all about their MAGA nonsense getting them banished. They read the NYPost, love Jackie Rowling, and share scads of content about the dangers of dusky-skinned immigrants.

by Anonymousreply 173August 20, 2025 1:11 PM

The DL reddit is full of anti-trans lunatics and other conservatives. I really wish someone would start a liberal Datalounge reddit.

by Anonymousreply 174August 20, 2025 1:39 PM

[quote] Let’s not forget the subreddit devoted to DL stalking and judgment. It’s run mostly by perma-banned DL freaks who’ll tell you all about their MAGA nonsense getting them banished.

It’s funny, I just looked it up and I see threads there also complaining about time out and the people there also blaming MAGA for FFing them for their anti-MAGA comments. Might be mythology that they’re different from people here.

by Anonymousreply 175August 20, 2025 2:06 PM

There was someone on there last week defending Sydney Sweeney and her jeans ad. Maybe "MAGA-lite" but MAGA for sure. They all claim it's the "pro-trans" loons banning them.

Look, I don't doubt that transphobes get banned after posting a transphobic rant because the majority consensus here is generally neutral-to-"pro"-trans - aka "trans acceptance" or live and let live. They're getting banned because they insist on fixating around an unpopular opinion and posting about it incessantly.

That's not the same thing as someone expressing an opinion that is generally accepted but controversial to a small subset, and members of that subset gaming the system somehow to brigade posts they dislike with erroneous f&f votes.

But the tansphobes on reddit, and a few of them here, too, pretend that they're the real victims. Unbelievable.

by Anonymousreply 176August 20, 2025 2:16 PM

I didn't realise there was a reddit dedicated to DL.

I was a member of another forum message board years ago that eventually closed and there was also a reddit dedicated to that. It was hilarious because they called out posters by name and gossiped about them like you might gossip about celebrities. "You'll never believe what bob1234 has said now!"

by Anonymousreply 177August 20, 2025 2:20 PM

R177 That's hysterical. Someone go create r/BILLTAYLOR.

by Anonymousreply 178August 20, 2025 2:23 PM

R178 that would be a great name for the new liberal Datalounge subreddit.

by Anonymousreply 179August 20, 2025 2:35 PM

‘’Jane you ignorant slut…’’

by Anonymousreply 180August 20, 2025 2:37 PM

I'm intrigued by R144 and the accusation against "v8fairy" and the talk of packet capture tools and the discovery of six or seven sock-puppet accounts being used to "brigade" other DLers and get them banned. R144, can you describe it more if you truly do have receipts? What kinds of posters/content is this person going after?

I've not been banned in a week, so it's probably coming due again.

by Anonymousreply 181August 20, 2025 2:54 PM

R181/Torta, he said he checked things out at work, and when he got home, he'd enlighten us more about what he found out and how he did it.

But I'm thinkin' he got banned, because he never got back to us.

Just a hunch.

by Anonymousreply 182August 20, 2025 3:05 PM

The bans and timeouts seemed to get aggressive a couple of years ago, with the arrival of Greg and Teacake.

by Anonymousreply 183August 20, 2025 3:10 PM

[quote] he said he checked things out at work, and when he got home, he'd enlighten us more about what he found out and how he did it.

They may have been waiting for him at his home.

by Anonymousreply 184August 20, 2025 3:22 PM

[quote]The bans and timeouts seemed to get aggressive a couple of years ago, with the arrival of Greg and Teacake.

Greg threatened over a dozen times to get me redlined. I dared him to do it. Taunted him about it, even. He lamely replied that "it takes time".

Then he got redlined. Only Muriel can redline. That said, about a month ago, I was locked out for 12-24 hours for no reason I can think of.

Could be someone's up to something, or it's a glitch in the system.

by Anonymousreply 185August 20, 2025 3:28 PM

Glitch? Glitch?! Feature.

by Anonymousreply 186August 20, 2025 3:30 PM

Gerg. His name was Gerg

by Anonymousreply 187August 20, 2025 3:34 PM

I don't think it's a "feature" of the system that multiple people with apparent karma from extremely high w&w counts are getting lengthy bans for little or no reason. DL is routinely banning their most popular content providers, ultimately driving them away? That makes no sense.

I just think there is no actual "system," Datalounge is "managed" by exactly one person who just lets it run on autopilot, allowing trolls to game the system to their liking. It's neither a glitch in the system nor a feature of the system, it [italic]is[/italic] the system, or what's serving as it now in the complete absence of any moderation.

by Anonymousreply 188August 20, 2025 3:41 PM

I think Greg was the last person red-lined, to my knowledge. I never see the red-lining anymore, they used to be quite funny from time to time, and it was nice knowing someone was in charge, looking out for us, like a deity.

by Anonymousreply 189August 20, 2025 4:21 PM

I doubt there’s a relationship between your Karma and whether you can be saved from a temporary ban.

by Anonymousreply 190August 20, 2025 6:15 PM

Greg is still here. But he's gone underground.

The system is too attractive, and too easy to break into, for a fat creep like that to stay away.

by Anonymousreply 191August 20, 2025 6:18 PM

The bans are based on karma ratio. This was confirmed by DL's sole employee "Tony" who commented on a banned poster's ratio in an email. This was in the other thread.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 192August 20, 2025 6:19 PM

There are ways to counteract a timeout, and they occasionally do the trick, but you'll have to learn about them elsewhere. I would probably get banned for telling you here.

by Anonymousreply 193August 20, 2025 6:24 PM

[quote]R192 The bans are based on karma ratio. This was confirmed by DL's sole employee "Tony" who commented on a banned poster's ratio in an email. This was in the other thread.

Is this “Tony” grooming a replacement, should anything happen to him?? I am scared by our entire futures, the very DL ground we stand on, resting on the shoulders of but one mere mortal.

I might even be willing to pay $2.25 a month if I knew there was a backup Mod on board. Surely others feel the same?

by Anonymousreply 194August 20, 2025 6:34 PM

[quote]The bans are based on karma ratio.

I suppose everyone could go into defensive mode and give yourself 50 WWs on every reply to really make your attacker work for it.

by Anonymousreply 195August 20, 2025 7:05 PM

I said in a recent thread (maybe this one, there are several on this topic) that since our trolls treat the f&f button like a downvote on Reddit, we all need to be a lot more generous with w&ws and treat it like an upvote.

by Anonymousreply 196August 20, 2025 7:11 PM

Well, I haven't used my usual moniker, and I haven't been banned since.

Stay tuned.

by Anonymousreply 197August 20, 2025 7:55 PM

R197 Rubbish. In 20 years never used a non de plume and have been banned constantly over last six months.

by Anonymousreply 198August 20, 2025 9:11 PM

[quote]I said in a recent thread (maybe this one, there are several on this topic) that since our trolls treat the f&f button like a downvote on Reddit, we all need to be a lot more generous with w&ws and treat it like an upvote.

It appears based on the analysis that I have done that WWs do not act as a counterweight to FFs. I suspect this is because FFs are actually relatively rare, unlike WWs. A person can receive as few as 5 and receive a temporary ban.

by Anonymousreply 199August 20, 2025 9:16 PM

[quote]What kinds of posters/content is this person going after?

The main topic is Israel / Gaza. Some evidence that anti-trans posters are being targeted as well. But it is also fairly random. Others may have taken up this tactic, but v8fairy is mainly targeting people he doesn't like (and he doesn't like anyone who speaks out in favor of the Palestinians).

by Anonymousreply 200August 20, 2025 9:21 PM

What sets the length of a ban? If it's not a ratio but just a threshold, why are some bans long and some short? I've had bans that lasted under an hour and bans that lasted close to a week. But every time I've been banned on a Friday or a weekend, the ban didn't lift until Monday morning. Some of it seems random (the wild range in the length of bans) and some of it seems human-driven (a weekend ban never lifting before Monday).

by Anonymousreply 201August 20, 2025 9:23 PM

T194, I assume Muriel's fortune will all go to the cat, so we can expect the same high quality of service we've always enjoyed. The change won't even be noticeable!

by Anonymousreply 202August 20, 2025 9:27 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 203August 20, 2025 9:30 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 204August 20, 2025 9:31 PM

Ahem.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 205August 20, 2025 9:34 PM

r188 "DL is routinely banning their most popular content providers"

Um - most popular content providers? What?

by Anonymousreply 206August 20, 2025 9:39 PM

What exactly needs explaining, R206? I said people with very high w&w counts are getting regularly banned. Posters here are content providers - do you see any content here besides our posts? W&W votes are given to posts that garner positive engagement - they a voting system, basically. So the posts with the most votes are the most popular, and the posters making those posts are the most popular content providers - and we8re regularly getting banned despite that.

by Anonymousreply 207August 20, 2025 9:45 PM

R206, the posters with the highest number of WWs.

Read R188 again.

by Anonymousreply 208August 20, 2025 9:51 PM

R205, that tells me nothing except for the fact that the v8fairy posts a lot of "Tasteful Friends" threads.

by Anonymousreply 209August 20, 2025 10:04 PM

Thanks to the techno savvy guy who outed V8fairy and its 7 sock puppets. Sure it was the same weirdo who would respond to my Nicholas Galitzine threads within minutes. V8fairy is not only very sick but very old. It keep accusing me of being some ancient music video producer from 1985. I posted the Galitzine threads because I actually had some "inside" info on his actually personal love life with Austin Kevitch. I had a relative who worked for his management company who also new many of his friends and lived in the same neighborhood in Santa Monica were they lived together for 4 years. I"ve seen tape of Galitizine giving a semi naked lap dance to an aroused Kevitch. Naïvely thought a "gay gossip" site would be interested in a actual GAY GOSSIP. Silly me. My bans began at the time I started the Galitzine/Kevitch threads. Absurdly this V8fairy creature would start an identical thread on Galitzine within hours. Whatever. Have learned my lesson here well. Although I have actual info on several young closeted actors like He-Man Mrs Bambi Kevitch. I'll never post . Not worth the pillory I got from psychos like V8fairy and it's ilk.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 210August 20, 2025 11:59 PM

AMEN to every single word posted by R176.

by Anonymousreply 211August 21, 2025 12:06 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!