Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

L.A. Olympics will be first to offer venue naming rights

“Our job is to push and our job is to do what’s best for the Olympics in Los Angeles,” LA28 chairman Casey Wasserman told The Times. “Our job in those conversations [with the IOC] was to explain why this was more than just about money. It was about experience and value and opportunity.”

Of course the Trump Olympics would be the first to do this.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12August 15, 2025 3:44 AM

Tacky!

by Anonymousreply 1August 14, 2025 6:36 PM

LA does not need the Olympics at this time, especially since it looks like it will turn into another Nazi Games. Casey Wasserman (son of you know who) is not only a Jew but also a UCLA alum yet he proudly stood next to Trump when they made this stupid announcement.

by Anonymousreply 2August 14, 2025 9:24 PM

Rusty Kuntz Synchronized Swimming Piscina

by Anonymousreply 3August 14, 2025 10:16 PM

I'm so disappointed that Trump will be president during the 250th anniversary of the country in 2026...and during the Summer Olympics in 2028.

It's just more attention drawn to him and his corruption. Maybe he will have a heart attack soon.

by Anonymousreply 4August 14, 2025 10:49 PM

The combination of late-stage capitalism and the Nazification of the United States are two sides of the same coin.

by Anonymousreply 5August 14, 2025 10:51 PM

What ever city host the Olympics looses a ton of money....I think it makes sense trying something new

by Anonymousreply 6August 14, 2025 11:08 PM

R6. Oh, for FUCK'S sake! "LOSES"!

by Anonymousreply 7August 14, 2025 11:11 PM

They are going to out-Atlanta Atlanta.

by Anonymousreply 8August 14, 2025 11:28 PM

R8 hardly. They hosted the first profit-making Games in 1984, and are recreating the same model for these Games. 1984 is considered a landmark success. 1996 is considered a lesser Games—mediocre in all respects.

by Anonymousreply 9August 14, 2025 11:34 PM

[quote]1984 is considered a landmark success.

That's because we didn't have those pesky Russians.

by Anonymousreply 10August 15, 2025 1:07 AM

1984 got a lot of hype because of the Eastern Bloc boycott and the record medal count for the U.S. that wouldn't be possible without it, plus it was the apex of Reagan's America. The 80s at their most 80s.

1996 was not great to begin with, lots of disorganization, a B-tier city struggling to appear world class, and then the bombing happened. Pretty grim in comparison.

by Anonymousreply 11August 15, 2025 3:43 AM

R10, Fuck you.

by Anonymousreply 12August 15, 2025 3:44 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!