Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why are the residents of Washington D.C. treated so badly?

The city did not have any votes in the Electoral College to vote for President and Vice-President, until passage of the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution in 1961.

Only in 1973 did Congress allow DC residents to elect a mayor, council members and neighborhood commissioners, but prohibited the council from enacting certain laws and the city from having voting members in the US House or Senate.

And their attempts at becoming the 51st state are continually blocked.

Now, they're basically under Federal control.

I mean, judging by the ethnic composition of the city, I can pretty much guess why. But is there some other reason?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25August 13, 2025 9:39 PM

No. It's pretty much that.

by Anonymousreply 1August 13, 2025 5:57 PM

Because the "Federal City" was meant in some ways to be treated differently from the states.

It's not about the people living there. It's the unusual legal status of the District itself. Solutions to this have included:

1) Giving the District of Columbia voting representation in Congress

2) Granting statehood to DC, an extension of #1

3) Reformation and retrocession - Carve out a tiny "Federal District" encompassing the National Mall, the Capitol Complex, and the White House. Call that the District of Columbia, and make it legally our nation's capital, with only the First Family as legal residents. The remainder of the former District of Columbia would then be ceded to Maryland, and bring enough population to add a House seat or two to that state's delegation.

by Anonymousreply 2August 13, 2025 5:59 PM

For the same reason Puerto Rico isn’t a state, OP. Both would give the Democrats 4 extra seats in the Senate.

by Anonymousreply 3August 13, 2025 6:01 PM

After Donald Trump won the presidential election, Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser flew to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate to see him.

When Republicans pressured her over the giant “Black Lives Matter” lettering she installed in front of the White House during Trump’s first term, Bowser agreed to remove it. Her reasoning: The city had bigger fish to fry, particularly on managing the federal job cuts Trump has enacted this year.

Now, as Trump federalizes the police in the capital and deploys the National Guard, Bowser faces perhaps the biggest test to date of her leadership and her ability to navigate the White House.

Bowser’s comments in response to the announcement illustrate how she’s often trying to communicate multiple messages at one time.

Describing Trump’s executive action as “unsettling and unprecedented,” Bowser on Monday blasted the city’s lack of full autonomy without personalizing that frustration or criticizing Trump directly.

“I can’t say that given some of the rhetoric of the past that we’re totally surprised,” she said.

Minutes later, she suggested the federal intervention may work to the city’s benefit and told reporters she didn’t have the legal authority to stop Trump’s plans.

“The fact that we have more law enforcement and presence in neighborhoods, that may be positive,” she said.

But Bowser struck a stronger tone during a virtual conversation with community leaders on Tuesday.

Asked what residents can do, Bowser said, “This is a time where community needs to jump in and we all need to, to do what we can in our space, in our lane, to protect our city and to protect our autonomy, to protect our Home Rule, and get to the other side of this guy, and make sure we elect a Democratic House so that we have a backstop to this authoritarian push.”

The following day, she responded to a question about her relationship with Trump saying, “I’m the mayor and he’s the president. I mean, that’s always been our relationship, and the DC mayor and the president of the United States will always have probably more interaction than any city in the rest of our country. So, we’re going to keep doing our job.”

Christina Henderson, a member of the DC council, suggested she empathized with the difficult balance Bowser is trying to strike. She noted that only in 1973 did Congress allow DC residents to elect a mayor, council members and neighborhood commissioners, but prohibited the council from enacting certain laws and the city from having voting members in the US House or Senate.

“You do not want to be the mayor that loses home rule and that there is no mayor after you,” Henderson said.

Asked if she planned to push back harder in the wake of an unprecedented undermining of her authority, Bowser said Monday, “My tenor will be appropriate for what I think is important for the district and what’s important for the district is that we can take care of our citizens.”

Anti-Trump sentiment is fierce in activist spaces across the city, which former Vice President Kamala Harris won last year with 90% of the vote.

At a demonstration this week, the Free DC project, a movement grounded in demanding DC statehood, denounced the Trump administration’s actions. Organizers accused Trump of trying to provoke violence and compared immigration arrests to kidnappings.

“Black Washingtonians have long recognized that community violence cannot be solved through state violence,” said Free DC’s organizing director Nee Nee Taylor, questioning the effectiveness of policing over investing in social programs to uplift the most vulnerable.

“We will not be idle as oppressors’ structures try to harm our communities and take power,” she added.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4August 13, 2025 6:12 PM

The only democracy in the world where the citizens who live in the capital don’t—can’t—participate.

by Anonymousreply 5August 13, 2025 6:17 PM

It’s the “residue” of our Constitution, of a piece that was never updated or fully revised when it made sense. Other countries have similar federal cities or “enclaves” with powers dissimilar to the rest of their government. It is what it is. Under the Constitution, Congress has plenary power. Congress delegated that power to the President except as pursuant to the home rule act (a Nixon bill!)

by Anonymousreply 6August 13, 2025 6:19 PM

🌚…

Understand?

by Anonymousreply 7August 13, 2025 6:23 PM

New York Times site shows a picture of Trump's kevlar and mask-wearing shock troops doing foot patrol (something city cops used to do) in the gritty, mean, violence-plagued, and economically deprived streets of . . . Georgetown.

Laughable.

by Anonymousreply 8August 13, 2025 6:30 PM

There’s no Berlin Wall surrounding the city. Any resident who feels the political situation there is intolerable can easily leave and move a short distance away to Maryland or Virginia. The people who do live there voluntarily agree to live with the situation when they make the choice to stay there.

by Anonymousreply 9August 13, 2025 6:52 PM

Funny how the cities Dump complains about the most-LA, Chicago, DC and New York-have black mayors. And funny how his criticism of San Francisco has diminished since a white man was elected to replace the previous mayor, a black woman.

by Anonymousreply 10August 13, 2025 7:03 PM

A wealthy Jewish mayor! Those kinda mayors scare the hell out of Donnie.

by Anonymousreply 11August 13, 2025 7:07 PM

[quote] funny how his criticism of San Francisco has diminished since a white man was elected to replace the previous mayor, a black woman.

The number of news stories about SF and its dysfunction and societal ills has dropped dramatically. There used to be constant reporting of SF and now I can’t recall the last time I saw a news story about it. You know Trump responds only to what he sees on TV.

by Anonymousreply 12August 13, 2025 7:14 PM

Because: Karen Bass! Muriel Bowers!

Have we not learned that when Trump speaks, just check on the last live Fox News story. Correlation factor = .999999.

by Anonymousreply 13August 13, 2025 7:18 PM

[quote]After Donald Trump won the presidential election, Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser flew to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate to see him.

The mayor is terrified that Trump will somehow scuttle the deal for a new Washington Commanders stadium, so she's sucking up at every opportunity.

by Anonymousreply 14August 13, 2025 7:23 PM

R9, does that mean it’s right to deprive those people of representation? Democracy either has meaning or no meaning.

by Anonymousreply 15August 13, 2025 7:49 PM

R24 pragmatic, perhaps savvy. But not terrified. He had full legal authority to do what he’s done this far.

by Anonymousreply 16August 13, 2025 8:03 PM

For R14^

by Anonymousreply 17August 13, 2025 8:04 PM

PS he can’t kill that deal

by Anonymousreply 18August 13, 2025 8:04 PM

R15 the District is not entitle to any democracy. Nor is anyone under our Constitution.

Each state IS guaranteed a republican form of government. The District is not…that’s also under our Constitution.

by Anonymousreply 19August 13, 2025 8:07 PM

From the linked article:

[quote] “We’re going to go for statutes in DC and then ultimately for the rest of the country, where that’s not going to be allowed,” Trump said, singling out New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, all cities governed by Democrats. He also criticized the city government’s long-term push to be made a state, saying it was an attempt by Democrats to get two more senators. “Statehood is ridiculous. We want to straighten the place out,” Trump said.

Autonomy and Home Rule are basically going to be a thing of the past, for Washington D.C.

Any power that Trump can usurp, he will.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20August 13, 2025 8:14 PM

That’s not usurping power. That’s using existing powers. From the end of Reconstruction until 1972 there was no local govt in the District. Congress granted certain power, and Congress could always take it away. You may not like it it, but it’s perfectly legal—

The dirty “secret” of our nation is that that removal of Reconstruction in 1876 led directly to unimagined trauma and delay in our country’s social-political development. But they don’t teach that anymore, apparently …

by Anonymousreply 21August 13, 2025 8:23 PM

[quote] There’s no Berlin Wall surrounding the city. Any resident who feels the political situation there is intolerable can easily leave and move a short distance away to Maryland or Virginia. The people who do live there voluntarily agree to live with the situation when they make the choice to stay there.

Sure i mean staying and fighting to change a city you like to live in is totally unthinkable. The only solution to a bad political situation is to move.

by Anonymousreply 22August 13, 2025 8:27 PM

They love money yet despise the economic powerhouses.

by Anonymousreply 23August 13, 2025 8:56 PM

Because they vote in Marion Berry?

by Anonymousreply 24August 13, 2025 9:13 PM

No 24z. He’s long gone.

by Anonymousreply 25August 13, 2025 9:39 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!