Kate Middleton talks about having cancer and still doesn’t say which type she had

She said she had abdominal surgery. That really limits the kinds of cancer it could be.

Because she doesn't want the whole world talking about the state of her ass and cunt, perhaps

It was her Princess Parts

Almost swept away by some vulgar little tumor.

[quote]What is the point of keeping it a secret?

Because a princess does not discuss her hoo-hoo, whether it be healthy or rotten or burned out.

Eh, it's her business. She has enough to deal with, give the poor lady a break.

I don't understand OP. Why does she have to tell anyone what type of cancer she had?

Because OP feels he has a right to know!

Here comes the KGs

The what, R9?

Who cares op?

I'm assuming ovarian based on the abdominal surgery and the quotes about her being "lucky to be alive". Ovarian cancer is extremely pernicious and it has a low survival rate. My aunt battled it and had to have abdominal surgery to remove a huge mass of cancer tissue. She did chemo as well, but it eventually killed her within a couple of years of her diagnosis. I think it's weird that she won't name it either, but maybe discussing any matters of the ovaries is too improper for British nobility.

[quote]I think it's weird that she won't name it either, but maybe discussing any matters of the ovaries is too improper for British nobility.

Or it's just nobodies business but her own.

She scheduled this interview to discuss her cancer. Her not saying what kind is ridiculous.

Really, R14? Saying she has cancer and what that's been like for her isn't enough for you? By the way, can you explain why you need to know the details? Who did you fuck this week?

R14 wants to know, it's his right: was it cunt cancer? TELL HIM!

This is the other edge of the sword Kate has chosen to wield.

She wants to be a royal? She wants to be a household name, and a future queen, and a staple of supermarket tabloids? Then people are going to be nosy about her cancer of the asshole. Her right to privacy evaporated when she chose to strip for Billy the Bald and become a future consort.

What the fuck are you banging on about, Miss R17?

Yes, R17, I'm so sure she wants to be a "a staple of supermarket tabloids." Sounds like that's what YOU want for her. Because you don't know her. You're just an idiot.

R17 is just a nosy littles Gladys Kravitz cunt.

So much hostility. Is this a result of that other thread getting shut down?

She is not a politician or a celebrity. She has a right to keep some things private.

I think it’s strange to talk about it but not specify type and area. It’s like a weird tease.

[quote] She is not a politician or a celebrity. She has a right to keep some things private.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

I believe she has the right but not for any reason you have given

Cervical cansuh!

Why is it your business though R23?

Do you understand you are at a gossip site r26?

Jeepers, if her prognosis really is this poor they'll have no choice but to bring Harry back.

See you in 48 hours r28

I really don't need to know what kind of cancer she had. What purpose, if not satisfying morbid curiosity, would it serve? Why fucking dwell in the mortality-oriented aspect of the disease? If she did reveal the type, I could see people "doing their own research" and coming up with all sorts of speculation about prognosis, survival rates, and causes. And God forbid , speculation about what she may have done to bring on cancer so young. All unproductive.

If she has a duty to fulfill, it would be to support efforts like preventive screening for young people, supportive services during treatment and aftercare, and research. Stuff that can practically help people with all types of cancers.

Only a few decades ago the word “cancer” was spoken in hushed tones. No one would have dreamed enquire whether it was afflicting one’s cervix or anus

R14 she wasn’t interviewed

She chose the life of a celebrity. She could accomplish so much by addressing cancer awareness, i.e. how it was discovered, how to guide her subjects to the same tests and treatments.

[QUOTE]i.e. how it was discovered, how to guide her subjects to the same tests and treatments.

This is not a Princess's job. It's the role of the physician. It's almost as though you think she should supplant the experts. oncologists. etc. in dispensing medical advice. Sheesh.

And you have decided the parameters of her job. She's a CELEBRITY REPRESENTATIVE OF HER COUNTRY.

That's how they generate revenue. She'll be the next Queen if her health holds up. Her late mother-in-law would have been a beacon in the same circumstances.

She needs to start earning her keep unless she's too sick to do so.

I understand her desire for privacy and it is her right to maintain it. Some people who have celebrity and favorable press take the opportunity of their illness to educate people about what symptoms to watch for, what to expect during exams and surgery, helpful hints to endure chemo and radiation. But that's asking a lot, and the experience might be too fresh and/or too painful for her to recount to the public.

R33 She's not a celebrity and she does not and will never have subjects, you complete idiot.

I'm not r33, but celebrity means FAMOUS, or BEING WELL-KNOWN. Yes, we call movie stars and other media figures who seek out fame "celebrities", but someone like the wife of the future kind of England will have celebrity whether she sought it out or not. The Royal Family of Great Britain exploit its celebrity for many good causes, mainly to raise money for charities. Part of the business of "the Firm" , (the name given to it by Queen Elizabeth's father, (King George VI) is to make sure that the royal family is always in the news somehow or other, although it tries to make sure that the publicity is positive whenever possible.

As a working royal, she does have a kind of quasi-constitutional role. and she receives a substantial amount of money from the Head of State for it. So there is a real public interest in her state of health: the level of detail required is obviously a matter for debate.

[QUOTE] And actually, someone to help talk you through that, show you and guide you through that sort of phase that comes after treatment, I think is really valuable,” she went on.

Shame nobody talked her through life with a stoma and colostomy bag!

If it's ovarian cancer, then it's understandable not to want to put it out there.

Ovarian cancer is usually caught late therefore has a low survival rate. Not only would identifying the cancer as ovarian send the media into a frenzy, it would scare her children.

The "abdominal surgery" she had is consistent with the "debulking surgery" many ovarian cancer patients have prior to starting chemo. Informing the public she had "abdominal surgery" is one way around naming the actual cancer.

Many people living with cancer draw inspiration from stories of those who have battled the disease and survived it. I think Kate could do a lot of good by letting the public know what type of cancer she had and how she fought it.

Ludicrous of posters trying disguise their prurient interest by dressing it up as public interest or benefit - exactly what the most disgusting tabloids do.

^Agree to an extent but her children come first.

If keeping it private spares her children having their mother's possibly grim diagnosis splashed in their faces every time they turn on the tv or go on the internet, then so be it. They aren't even teenagers yet.

[quote] prurient interest

Oh, please, darlin'.

R44 I would hope she was honest enough to let her children know what was happening with her.

R6 yes—everyday life is a struggle, as is.😵‍💫

Why are her children on the internet, or watching tv news?

Seethe with jealousy, op.

These threads are hilarious!

Why wouldn’t they be R48?

[quote]Because a princess does not discuss her hoo-hoo, whether it be healthy or rotten or burned out.

Unless it's about the stinky Tampons the King gets his knickers in a wad over.

[quote]Saying she has cancer and what that's been like for her isn't enough for you?

No. All cancers are different.

[quote]She's not a celebrity

You’re retarded.

R51 so they won’t know mummy has the C. Duh.

I hate this cunt.

It must be an HPV-related cancer like anal or cerivcal. That’s the only reason she’s not talking about it, so people don’t know she slutted it up at Uni.

I hate people who hide behind children. For some reason, she's a beloved figure; she could help many people. Biden announcing that he had aggressive prostate cancer caused an uptick in men getting checked for the disease. That's a good thing. Use your position for doing something other than standing on a damned balcony and waving to the peasants.

She’s reinforcing the idea that cancer is embarrassing and shameful.

R59 Exactly.

You people are disgusting. If a coworker mentioned to you that they were taking time off for scheduled surgery and didn’t specify what kind of surgery, you don’t ask them for the details to satisfy your morbid curiosity. Revealing a cancer diagnosis is no different. No one owes YOU any explanation.

Biden hid the fact that he had prostate cancer for as long as possible, r58.

No one considers the crowds in Pall Mall to be peasants, least of all the people in the crowds themselves. In the UK it's difficult to get a cancer test done on your own initiative, but Charles and Catherine revealing they had cancer has raised awareness of the importance of getting checked when they're invited to be the NHS.

R62 is full of shit about Biden.

Fuck off, MAGAt.

R61 I had surgery for prostate cancer last year. When I told co-workers I was going to be out for a while for surgery, I told those who asked that I had prostate cancer. I'm not ashamed of it, and I actually convinced a couple of guys I work with to get a PSA test when we talked about it.

Yes, it's a personal decision, but the problem with Kate is that a) she's a public figure, like it or not, and b) it's already been revealed she was being treated for cancer. I don't see why she can't just tell people what kind of cancer she was treated for.

[quote]You people are disgusting. If a coworker mentioned to you that they were taking time off for scheduled surgery and didn’t specify what kind of surgery, you don’t ask them for the details to satisfy your morbid curiosity. Revealing a cancer diagnosis is no different. No one owes YOU any explanation.

Mavis from accounts receivable in the next office is not the future Queen of England with a platform and a PR machine that can help millions of people. Princess William is not your co-worker or your bestie, she's an international figure. She could have helped and chose not to.

Oh get lost, r63. It's a well-established fact that Biden didn't disclose either his cognitive decline or his cancer, which he wasn't just diagnosed with. Biden's coyness about his health is precisely what helped Trump win. Didn't you notice how he was forced to stand down because of his bad health, which he still refused to admit to.

How about Lloyd Austin, then? He had prostate cancer and hid it, even from his deputy and the president. Was he reinforcing the idea that cancer is something to be ashamed of?

It was her cooter. Royals don't talk about that publicly.

R64 seems to think that his personal situation, as a completely unknown person, applies in exactly the same way to a world-famous woman whose every move and non-move is commented upon.

Your judgmentalism is precisely why she doesn't want to reveal what's happening in which part of her body.

Not at all, r59. She's reinforcing the fact that cancer is a personal thing that can happen to any of us, even the most seemingly vibrant and full of life. I'm glad she's also reinforcing the idea that it's possible to keep some things private and that people should respect that.

R56=MeAgain.

Stuck up bitch. Her sister-in-law would have shown us the cancer

R22 Of course she’s not one of those things.

Those people work for a living.

Celebrities all work for a living, R72? Stupidity abounds on this thread.

Truth Cancer.

Not sharing her medical records with the world isn't the same as lying, but of course idiots like R74 are too stupid to understand that.

R75 She may not be outright lying, but she's certainly withholding the truth.

From you, you mean, you nosy bitch R76. She owes you NOTHING. How many times did you take a shit yesterday? WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW!

I love it--all the asshats here who are beside themselves with frustration that information about a total stranger's health is being kept from them. Suck it, clowns! 🤡

R77 You okay, honey? You need a minute?

No, honey R79, I'm just fine. I don't need to know about some woman's cancer prognosis. Are you okay, though, being deprived of such necessary info?

Some of you are correct, she doesn't have to divulge her personal health information. However, if she cared about doing good for her fans she would have told them to get checked, especially if they're under 50 like her. I guess she's more like Catherine de Medici than Catherine the Great

The public pays for her care. Where are the receipts??

If she named the type of cancer, the news stations would be filled with interviews from “specialists”, speculation about her chances of survival, graphs, etc ad Nauseum. People would tell stories about how their neighbor died just two years after diagnosis.

She’s a survivor. ‘Nuff said.

And after all the work I did to normalize: talking about anal cancer!

I don't think she's in remission.

Nobody here in the UK is demanding to know the details of her illness. It’s her business.

[quote] You people are disgusting. If a coworker mentioned to you that they were taking time off for scheduled surgery and didn’t specify what kind of surgery

That’s not the case here. She called for an interview to talk about it without actually talking about it. She’s doing damage. When public people come out about an illness millions go and get screened.

Not true, r86.

She must be advocating for people go and get full body scans to detect cancer. Good luck getting the NHS to pay for that. There are young women dying of cervical cancer. If that’s what she has she should be advocating for pap smears. She’s helping no one with this and looks like a narcissistic goofball. She should be using her celebrity for good. She’s a public servant.

I believe she still has a right to privacy if/when she chooses to discuss her condition at all. I wish only the best for her: she seems like a lovely woman.

R82 No they do not.

R80 Clearly, you're not fine, getting all worked up over some royal from across the pond.

Some Americans are probably confused about prevailing expectations for privacy in the UK. Europe generally has the opposite approach to privacy from us, opt in rather than opt out. Right? And the British have never been known as over-sharers?

How long ago was she Kate Middleton? I know you girls are old and find even small changes daunting, but give the woman her due.

Just because she has private care and not NHS doesn’t mean that the public doesn’t support those cheesy welfare queens.

[quote]she seems like a lovely woman

Based on what? If you know her personally and are friends with her, then I will take back the question.

Why is Kate such a sacred cow around here?

R95 You have no idea what you're talking about.

R96, Based on reports of her helping her brother with his depression, which HE revealed, not her.

Sure, they are hard little workers.

Jumped-up marmalade-smeared German aristocrats and sex pests and C-list Hollywood starlets and horse enthusiasts.

[quote] She scheduled this interview to discuss her cancer. Her not saying what kind is ridiculous.

I agree. She is in a position to encourage women to get checked and discuss symptoms with their healthcare providers. She is in a position to do real valuable advocacy.

But Kate Middleton posits herself as a Royal porcelain doll.

[quote] Europe generally has the opposite approach to privacy from us, opt in rather than opt out. Right?

You’ve obviously never picked up a British tabloid.

Her brother sounds like such a Mary!

[quote] That’s not the case here. She called for an interview to talk about it without actually talking about it. She’s doing damage. When public people come out about an illness millions go and get screened.

You know that, if she disclosed which kind, the public would be consulting the probabilities and speculating when she is expected to die. Perhaps she doesn’t want that for herself or her children. She doesn’t have much choice in the modern age but to acknowledge she has an Illness and to speak about it to a degree. There’s nothing at all disappointing about her not surrendering the totality of her privacy.

I wish the princess and her family well, for the long term. If the UK wants to have such visible and active royalty in the 21st century they set a wonderful example.

P.S. I love that little brat, Louis.

R75 cultists gotta cult

[quote] Her brother sounds like such a Mary!

Give the guy a break. Depression can be a very debilitating illness. It might be hard to understand if you've never experienced it personally or been close to someone who has.

I found James's appearance and participation in his sister's wedding in 2011 to be quite intriguing.

R108 How could anyone be depressed in that family? The mom's a former flooze, the dad runs a party planning business, one sister's anal-tumored Princess of Wales, and the other sister's got a million-dollar can. They're gloriously colorful.

If it's a kind of cancer that might point back to her sexual history, or lead to speculation about it, I find her lack of disclosure totally understandable and acceptable.

I was appalled at pharmacy personnel calling out the name of the prescription acyclovir to a person picking it up at Walgreen's in the Castro when I was picking up one of my own prescriptions. I eventually switched to another pharmacy to avoid those queens.

Her demand for privacy in some areas of her world - while gladly forsaking it in others - is inconsistent and galling. She can't have it both ways. She married into this celebrity family, and everything about her life is now the subject of gossip and glossy photography. This is what she gets for joining the family.

Same goes for Harry and MeAgain, who screech about privacy and security, while continually blogging and launching flop Netflix series about their lives.

Same goes for Lady Di, who bitched nonstop about invasions of privacy, but used the media to advance her interests - from that Revenge Dress to her photo ops in Rwanda and Tottenham.

They don't want too much privacy. If they have that, then the world realizes how irrelevant they actually are, and the majesty evaporates.

[quote]Her demand for privacy in some areas of her world - while gladly forsaking it in others - is inconsistent and galling. She can't have it both ways. She married into this celebrity family, and everything about her life is now the subject of gossip and glossy photography. This is what she gets for joining the family.

You're American right?

I don't think there is a huge disappointment in the UK that she has not been spilling her guts. It is true her family is famous, but it's official purpose is not to provide gossip.

I think she realizes it's galling to some people, like you, that you can't know everything about her private life. Like me, she may wonder why it is galling to you that you can't know what's going on inside her torso and she concluded she just can't please everyone and their inscrutable needs.

Unlike Harry or Diana, I don't think she is suing people or giving interviews constantly complaining about people talking about her. She has just decided not tell you all the things you desperately want to know, but don't need to know. I think it's galling only to you and your kind.

The point of the family is to provide a ceremonial head of state, not to talk about their intestines or reproductive tracts. Do you also wonder what the point of the president of Germany or of Israel is if he or she doesn't talk about her intestines or reproductive parts?

[quote] The point of the family is to provide a ceremonial head of state, not to talk about their intestines or reproductive tracts.

Then explain how we know about King Charles and his prostate.

HRM’s taint rot is more newsworthy, apparently.

R113. He is the serving head of state, and he had to explain why there would be alterations to his official duties. It was his choice to reveal the circumstances under which he discovered the cancer. Like Catherine, he has not revealed the kind of cancer from which he is suffering.

[quote] Same goes for Lady Di

Posting from 1981.

R115 He revealed he underwent surgery for an enlarged prostate, so I guess as long as the privates aren't cancerous, they can talk about 'em.

R117. Thank you for posting what was openly acknowledged in my post already. It is most helpful.

To repeat, if he wished to reveal these private details, he can. It should not be a source of frustration if he does not.

R118 Ahem:

[quote] The point of the family is to provide a ceremonial head of state, not to talk about their intestines or reproductive tracts.

R114 What is a "HRM"?

R119. Do you have a literacy problem?

If she doesn’t want to talk about it she shouldn’t be doing interviews about it. She looks like a moron.

His Royal Majesty

R121 No, but you seem to have trouble with the definition of "hypocrisy."

Or maybe it's just that you refuse to admit you speak from your arse and refuse to admit you, as one would say, "fucked up."

R123 There is no such term.

Cut me some slack, R125, it’s Independence Day. And shit is grim. Kicking the king out is all we’ve got left.

At least we didn’t organize any regicide. Hypocrites!

She's so dainty and delicate. Butter wouldn't melt in her mouth. Have her kids seen all of her drunk photos? Those of you who circle around this woman like she's some fragile baby doll aren't helping. If she wanted privacy, she should have married Bill the Scottish Fishmonger. She doesn't have to go into details. Just say, "They discovered a tumour in my colon. Colon cancer is affecting younger people. Please schedule a checkup today and donate to the Cancer Society.

R121 must be on the bad girls list. Her post doesn't appear for me unless I go through r124.

R129 She probably got FFed into oblivion.

I wonder why.

Kate has smoked heavily since she was a teenager so some kind of cancer was inevitable.

[quote]No one considers the crowds in Pall Mall to be peasants

How cute. Peasants don't know they are peasants even though they live in a kingdom with a living king.

Smell the cunt upthread telling people what to post.

I assume it’s a cancer with a pretty high mortality rate…she doesn’t want the pity and speculation.

[quote] she doesn’t want the pity and speculation.

I can understand any human being not wanting the speculation. The rest sounds like projection unless you know her personally.

R7 OP is Meghan Markle

We all know what r137 is.

I think she’d be nuts to start divulging any details about the type of cancer. It’s almost certainly colon or ovarian or something related/adjacent. She’s at least a little bit vain (nobody wears such over top hair extensions or makes such an effort to emphasize their slimness unless they are a little vain) and doesn’t want people taking about whether or not she has genital warts or a colostomy bag. I wouldn’t, either. Her kids are an even bigger reason. If you have a life expectancy of 5-7 years, there is no need to divulge that to kids that young. They can be told mom is ill and get the full gut punch when it’s down to a year. And a third reason might be that she got new experimental treatments not available to the average Briton that saved (or at least extended) her life. She can’t very well share a cancer story that involves her being saved by a treatment the NHS won’t provide for other people in the same condition.

But the “precancerous” bullshit, laughably amateurish doctored photo, complete disappearance (she could have waved out a car window ffs), and cheesy video were stupid moves.

The wrong people have cancer.

Just say you hate yt, OP, and go about your day.

Datalounge will not change to suit you.

[quote]I think she’d be nuts to start divulging any details about the type of cancer. It’s almost certainly colon or ovarian or something related/adjacent ... Her kids are an even bigger reason.

If it's ovarian, the idea that the future of the British monarchy was born of cancer-generating organs is an unfavorable matter of optics.

I'll ww you now r143 to help prevent you getting a time-out from the bigoted fat straight old lady Brits who think they belong here.

That won’t help

All of r121's posts have been liquidated.

If you are one of her acolytes you should be asking why. Exposed as homophobic maybe?

This is all Louis fault. He spoils everything, if you know what i mean…

R123,

That style does not exist, except to Americans.

Well since these styles are literally made up as TPTB, see fit, we are free to make up our own bullshit in response.

It's completely idiotic for her to say what kind of cancer she has. She is a human being and even if she is a celebrity has a right to privacy. And as one poster said if she reveals it the gossip and speculation would go through the roof and it's bad enough now. King Charles has not revealed what kind of cancer he has and nobody expects him to. Speculation says it is worse than the King lets on but it's his business. Hold something on for yourself and deal with it privately.

[quote] she doesn’t want the pity and speculation

So by all means, shroud the details of your illness in mystery, because that will certainly quell any speculation on the part of the public.

It just kills you that Kate is so beloved, doesn't it, OP? Not only did Meghan's smear campaign fail, but Kate is more popular than ever. Even when she gets cancer, you cannot show a modicum of grace.

Shouldn't you have moved on by now? Isn't Caitlin Clark the new race card punching bag?

Never thought about it this way before…

Wisteria AI:

The term "Wisteria sisters" refers to Kate Middleton (now the Duchess of Cambridge) and her sister, Pippa Middleton. It was a nickname used by the British press and within aristocratic circles to describe them, particularly in the early 2000s when Kate was dating Prince William. The name is a reference to the plant wisteria, which is known for its decorative appearance and ability to climb with "ferocious" strength, according to The Daily Mail. This nickname highlighted their perceived social climbing ambition and polished appearance, according to a post on Instagram.

AI responses may include mistakes.

[quote]King Charles has not revealed what kind of cancer he has and nobody expects him to.

Nobody is surprised that an elderly man who’s looked ill and deathly for a decade now has cancer.

People are more surprised that an early 40s woman who has been seemingly healthy now suddenly has a serious cancer that required her to have major surgery and a year of treatment. It’s not unreasonable for the public to be interested in what’s going on.

[quote] The wrong people have cancer.

Then man up r140 and name the people you think “deserve” cancer.

OP, isn't there a $299 Carnival Cruise you should be on?

I agree that she needs to be careful about how she talks about it. The initial PR missteps seem to have been forgiven by the public, but that sympathy card may not be good to play twice. The “Yay, I’m better” video didn’t go over too well and it was followed pretty quickly by her apparently NOT being better enough to follow a relatively light schedule.

She’s in a really tough spot. Whatever is wrong with her, it’s likely that her long term prognosis has some uncertainly, especially since cancer treatments improve constantly. This was not an interview, correct? She was doing a visit and simply talking to people? She’s got to say something, right? Sharing that she’s had a hard time doesn’t seem inappropriate to me. But if it comes out that she wasn’t that ill or the opposite was true and anyone else would have died but she had a head transplant and then spent 3 months in suspended animation getting her DNA edited and the blood of virgins transfused into, her that’s going to come back to haunt her.

She said she was in remission, not cancer-free.

R157 I'm not R140, but I'll gladly "man up."

1) Donald Trump

2) Elon Musk

3) Marjorie Taylor-Greene

4) Lauren Boebert

5) Mike Johnson

6) Jim Jordan

7) Pete Hegseth

8) Laura Loomer

9) Kristi Noem

10) Karoline Leavitt

11) JD Vance

12) Donald Trump Jr.

13) Eric Trump

14) Lara Trump

15) Ivanka Trump

16) Jared Kushner

17) Kimberly Guilfoyle

18) Lisa Murkowski

19) Susan Collins

20) Josh Hawley

Those are just my Top 20.

Good list r161.

How very DARE she?

Thank you!

r161 Why is Stephen Miller not on the list??

R165 He's #21.

The downside to that list would be the gushing sympathy and canonization of each one.

Only by 30% of the population (still too many, though).

R161, you’re not r140, and you left off the two very names r140 was referring to, so enough.

R169 What are you talking about? Would you like to be added to the list or something?

R161

21) Stephen Miller

22) Mitch McConnell

23) Joni Ernst

24) Steve Bannon

25) James Comer

26) Dan Crenshaw

27) Steve Scalise (he learned nothing from getting shot)

28) Harriet Hageman

29) Virginia Foxx (being born cross-eyed wasn't punishment enough)

30) All ICE agents

31) All January 6th rioters (who are also probably the same people as #30)

32) Ted Cruz

33) Matt Gaetz

34) Mrs. Matt Gaetz

35) Lindsey Graham

36) Elise Stefanik

37) RFK Jr.

38) Paul Gosar

39) Pam Bondi

40) R169, apparently

Why is Stephen Miller so low and below Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins? I can understand not caring for Lisa and Susan, but above Stephen Miller, come on.

R172 Feel free to rearrange the list as you see fit.

[quote] [R169] What are you talking about? Would you like to be added to the list or something?

I am r157, and as I said, I already have cancer.

R174 So do I, but it doesn't exempt me from creating a list of shitty people who should be suffering from it but aren't.

You fail to grasp the point, but as you have cancer, I’ll let you off the hook.

R176 Oh, I get the point.

I think the cancers of King Charles and Kate are embarrassing in some way. Maybe Kate had intestinal cancer and had a stoma and didn’t want people to imagine her shitting. I think Charles has either testicular or anal cancer, also being obviously embarrassing…and likely resulting in some jeering by asshole members of the public.

She’s married to a bald guy. She’s suffered enough.