Schumer sleepwalks through press conferences, Jeffries recites stale talking points, and meanwhile the GOP is out there setting the agenda. Do Democrats even realize what’s at stake? Or are they just hoping the public forgets who’s supposed to be leading the opposition?
Where Are the Democrats? Silent While Democracy Burns.
by Anonymous | reply 118 | June 22, 2025 7:31 PM |
Your average DLer still supports this type of Dem. They refuse to acknowledge that life sucks for the working class or the poor. They refuse to acknowledge that this is why Democrats lose. They refuse to acknowledge the deep inadequacy of their proposed solutions. They refuse to retire.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 16, 2025 4:13 PM |
Yeah, but from what I’ve seen lately, it doesn’t look like the Democrats lost at all. Trump himself has admitted multiple times that the election was rigged in his favor. I’m just wondering if any of this is even being investigated now that the FBI is stacked with Trump loyalists.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 16, 2025 4:17 PM |
R2 We knew they cheated in Obama 2012, the Dems continual tolerance of Republican crime is part of this problem.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | June 16, 2025 4:21 PM |
R3 Obama won both the popular and electoral vote by a solid margin. If anything, it’s the GOP that’s been more openly undermining democracy in recent years.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 16, 2025 4:28 PM |
R4 Yes, but they still attempted to rig election machines. Didn’t Karl Rove storm off fox news in a panic? Tolerating that just because we won was a mistake. I think we’re really looking at over a decade of failed oversight and failed enforcement.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 16, 2025 4:32 PM |
All the energy in the Democratic party is coming from the rank and file, the ones joining the rallies and protests. The leadership is still too attached to consultants and generally to the interests of the (rich) establishment. I think part of it is that we still need to flush out the generation that was spooked by 1972 and 1984 into turning "Republican lite" when they should be leaning on popular support for Democratic policies (look at the polls). Okay, not all of them are like that, the leadership is far too timid and mistakes energy for extremism.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 16, 2025 4:35 PM |
OP = La Belle Hogg
by Anonymous | reply 7 | June 16, 2025 4:59 PM |
Depending on who is counting... there were between 5 and 11 million on the streets Saturday protesting. "The Dems are ... weak, confused, silent, ineffective...etc. etc." is just something in the shape of a self-fulfilling prophecy. And also so Jan 2025, dated. The future is coming. Get ready for a struggle.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 16, 2025 5:04 PM |
There are fuckers today out in the streets trying to save democracy . I’d love to know what % of these street warriors decided not to vote for Harris? Did not vote at all?
More than a few would be my guess,
by Anonymous | reply 9 | June 16, 2025 5:09 PM |
Undoubtedly true, r9. However, it is time to look to the future and encourage these folks to participate next time.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 16, 2025 5:10 PM |
It also must be said that a lot of the articles in the NYT etc. about how Dems are demoralized and baffled turn out to be quoting just a few consultants and Third Way people. They'd probably dig up Joe Lieberman and get his opinion if they could.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 16, 2025 5:12 PM |
R10 Yes indeed well said we should encourage more. Because adults who don’t vote but will take to the streets for a dust up may just need better encouragement to vote
For 2028 the call should be for more encouragement.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | June 16, 2025 5:18 PM |
Yes, r12, it should be.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | June 16, 2025 5:20 PM |
They are lazily waiting for mid-terms.
They need to be creating a shadow government.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | June 16, 2025 5:28 PM |
We need to flush out the Democrats holding onto power in Congress. They need to be primaried, and replaced with fresher, younger people who are more in tune with what is going on in the country.
The party needs to come together for once; there has been too much bickering and trying to be the majority voice in the party, leading to a weak front together. This has been going on for decades. I remember how fractured the party was in 1968.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | June 16, 2025 5:28 PM |
R13 I think we should assume that adults that don’t vote , even with Trump on the ballot, most likely most won’t vote. Even if encouraged, That is where the smart money should be,
Did Harris Walz forget to encourage voters?
by Anonymous | reply 16 | June 16, 2025 5:33 PM |
I think this is part of the Dem strategy, much as I hate it and disagree with it. They are following the James Carville playbook — since they have no actual voting power, they are letting Trump and the Repugs dig themselves deeper amd deeper into unpopularity.
I think they are banking and planning (I hope) on retaking the House and Senate and are thinking they will move swiftly once that happens, maybe even instituting impeachment proceedings, knowing that will enrage Trump, especially if this time some Republicans feel emboldened enough to vote to impeach. By that time the Republicans may be willing to do triage on their wounded-and-bleeding party, and start to vote down the most right wing extremist stuff.
That’s no reason to be so silent and passive now, but I do think it’s deliberate even if I disagree with it.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 16, 2025 5:45 PM |
Dems have never been disciplined enough to have one message.
The GOP is expert at that. No matter how stupid the message is. They all stick to it like glue
by Anonymous | reply 18 | June 16, 2025 5:52 PM |
Dems are too busy holding on to their offices to do much else.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 16, 2025 5:53 PM |
Nancy Pelosi might need to take Hakeem Jeffries out back and remind him how leadership actually works.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | June 16, 2025 5:54 PM |
Democrats acting weak and ineffective as a plan of attack . Not because they are weak and ineffective but because it’s a plan,.
Thanks I feel better already R17.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | June 16, 2025 5:55 PM |
Elizabeth Warren would be a stronger choice as Senate Majority Leader.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | June 16, 2025 5:56 PM |
It is time for a new party. How does one begin afresh. The problem thought is the parties that are team R and D have monopolized the position.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | June 16, 2025 5:57 PM |
R1 is correct. Note literally any mention of AOC here that triggers responses from authenticated users, not trolls, that could be lifted straight from Fox News. The average DLer is a white midwesterner in their late fifties-early sixties, usually a retiree at that age, who watches CNN 24/7. They have zero context for anything outside of their limited experiences.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | June 16, 2025 5:58 PM |
[quote] The party needs to come together for once;
But come together around what? That is what always seems to be missing from these discussions. It's always some vague hope for unity but never unity around any particular policy or set of policies or ideas or anything else. Just millions of people marching together for no particular reason whatsoever.
I think we need a full on Fuck the Rich campaign, starting now. Take this Big Boneheaded Bill and shove it up their stupid ridiculous asses. Say that whatever pretense Trump used to make about being some new populist Republican who only wants to fuck over furriners and never working class white people is obviously a huge crock of shit. And then push for the opposite: much higher taxes on the rich, to fund an actual expansion of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, on the way toward a true, national health care policy. Also for every asshole whining about the national debt, a wealth tax specifically designed to pay down the debt itself, year after year after year.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | June 16, 2025 6:01 PM |
Not all of the Dems are staying silent. Some were at No King protests. Back in February or March, many congressional Democrats were trying to get access to government buildings and were being turned away by the DOGE assholes. Democratic congresspeople and senators introduced bills in opposition to Trump and Musk.
One of the issues is that the media doesn't have the bandwidth/resources to report on what every single Dem in Congress and Senate are doing in opposition to Trump.
The only Dem the media cares to regularly report on is AOC. The media doesn't have a fuck about most Democratic congresspeople because most of them aren't a "cool kid" like AOC is.
The Congresswomen in the Democratic Women Congressional caucus work their asses off, but since most of them are nerdy looking (Hillary Scholten) or odd looking (Maxine Dexter, Teresa Leger Fernandez, Rosa DeLauro), the media ignores them because none of them have the "cool Dem kid" look of AOC.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 16, 2025 6:02 PM |
R24 and we tend to be wrong about everything dealing with presidential elections. If there is any hope it’s never going to be found on the likes of DL. JHC we banned or give time outs to people on DL who just claimed the vote was going to be close. How incredibly stupid.
But no matter what happens in 2028 Walz s chances are now dead. Actually shot dead.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | June 16, 2025 6:06 PM |
[quote]Take this Big Boneheaded Bill and shove it up their stupid ridiculous asses.
How exactly do we do that, r25?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | June 16, 2025 6:07 PM |
[quote]And then push for the opposite: much higher taxes on the rich, to fund an actual expansion of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, on the way toward a true, national health care policy
The current Democratic party is comprised overwhelmingly of politicians who are funded by the health insurance industry. It's the reason why we've never had comprehensive healthcare legislation or a national health care service for all. What you describe is basically Medicare for All, a popular notion with Democratic voters that the overwhelming majority of national Democratic politicians reject.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | June 16, 2025 6:12 PM |
r28 By stressing constantly what the Republicans are voting for, not playing any subtle games, through advertising, on talk shows, with a united Fuck the Rich message. Don't sugarcoat, don't moderate it, for fuck's sake don't reach out to any motherfucking Republicans (in office, obviously voters are different but only if they aren't whores for the rich and Trump) and don't agonize about whether some fucking donor will have a shit fit and then not provide completely useless donations that will fund a nothing message that nobody cares about. Be an anti-rich fuckers party clearly and concisely, using all the messaging tools that people supposedly are paid large amounts of money to come up with.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | June 16, 2025 6:15 PM |
They ARE a rich fuckers party, though.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | June 16, 2025 6:16 PM |
[quote]However, it is time to look to the future and encourage these folks to participate next time.
HUH?
"Encourage" them?? WTF do you think Democrats have been doing since 1976? Encourage them? What are they, delicate Millennials or responsible American citizens? You just fucking VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION! There are NO excuses to ever not vote, which I hope even the dumbest of the left see now!
by Anonymous | reply 32 | June 16, 2025 6:17 PM |
Democrats are a useless political party because they serve the same corporate oligarchy as the GOP. They just go about it more quietly and with more performative shows of support for popular social causes and the marginalized sectors of the population. We should all be aware of this by now unless you're one of those still repressing that bitter realization from dawning on your slow brain. I saw so many delusional people posting during the massive protests shit like, "maybe if this many people actually showed up to vote..." What a pathetic joke. How about the Democratic party stop putting up decrepit fossils and corporate-owned candidates as the only other option to the lunatic GOP? Centrist Dems have been hypnotized into believing that all they need to do is appear to be a kinder, gentler center-right option to win an election. And THAT is exactly why more and more people are sitting out elections in the millions. They're not playing the lesser of two evils game anymore. Don't like how everything has gotten worse or collapsed? Better toughen up, then. The corporate status quo Democrats have decided, repeatedly, to remain corporate status quo and continue to force those lackluster, stagnant options on the rest of us. No thanks and fuck the Democratic Party.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | June 16, 2025 6:38 PM |
R1 - exactly. Pattern-recognition is desperately needed by those still unashamed to call themselves Democrats.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | June 16, 2025 6:40 PM |
We need another "Rock the Vote" type movement that was popular in the 90s.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | June 16, 2025 6:40 PM |
R20 - get real. Nancy Pelosi needs to have retired about 20 years ago. The delusional way the Democratic loyalists keep her on a pedestal is mind-boggling. She could be a fucking poster child for the Status Quo is the Only Way to Go corporate Democrat mentality. So many of you act like she's some crafty Machiavellian genius - it's pitiful. She's a fucking old lady who makes a lot of money in her current role and clings to it like a dog with a favorite chew toy. She also actively ignores/suppresses younger, fresher candidates from having a chance because they need to "wait their turn." Fuck her sideways. Kinda hard for younger, fresher candidates to have a "turn" when the fucking ancient goons like Pelosi continue to hang onto their positions, including many who are barely there due to severely diminished mental capacities (see, Dianne Feinstein).
by Anonymous | reply 36 | June 16, 2025 6:50 PM |
R2. = Cleopatra, Queen of Denial 🙄
This is what you idiots. support?
Every day the mask is coming off and more and more Americans are seeing Democrats for what they really are --. un-.American and anti-.USA.
You are NOT the good guys!
by Anonymous | reply 37 | June 16, 2025 6:52 PM |
Pelosi, the Anna Wintour of the House of Representatives.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | June 16, 2025 6:58 PM |
If this past weekend didn't Illuminate the divide between Democrat Party leadership and rank-and-file, I don't know what will. Rank-and-file were on the streets protesting; leadership was at a society wedding in the Hamptons.
I fear I'm one of the DLers that OP/R1 writes about. I've been a strong party supporter... well, all my life and I'm 60. If it will make OP (and everyone) feel any better, I'm done with the Democratic Party. The reaction of the party to Trump's victory (which is looking more and more like it was just outright stolen) has been less than lackluster. Not a single Democrat... wait, one did step forward to take on the GOP and the calcified DNC, so they promptly kicked him out of his leadership role, and yes, I'm referencing David Hogg. But just the fact that we here at DL have nicknamed him "La Belle" tells you everything you need to know. It's time to end the circular firing squad every time someone other than a pacifist centrist steps forward.
But here's what I'll say: this past weekend was the first glimmer of hope that all is not lost to Trump and his fascist administration and boot-licking supporters. We stood up. We were unafraid. We showed what a resistance can do in the face of totalitarian threats. Trump and his Gestapo saw it, too. He pouted through his entire parade, and retreated to Truth Salad to rake muck. They're so pissed off that the No Kings demonstrations so outshone TrumptyDumpty's birthday parade-in-fatigues that they're unleashing ICE on New York, Chicago, and Washington DC in the coming days. Sad sack of dogshit Kristi Noem participated in a home invasion in California this morning to make the point: they're not going anywhere.
Yeah, it would be nice if the DNC could provide leadership during this time of crisis. They can't. They won't. The politicians of Nancy Pelosi/Chuck Schumer's era are not capable of responding in this moment. Frankly, we should be happy they spent the afternoon on George Soros' South Hampton estate sipping gin and tonics rather than fucking up the protests with their out of date rhetoric and calls for calm and reason. We tried calm and reason when we let Merrick Garland sit on his hands for 2.5 years instead of prosecuting Trump and the J6 leadership, and it gave us Trump 2.0 and fascism.
So where are the Democrats, as OP asks? On the streets, metaphorically fighting. Pay attention to them and not the decrepit "leadership" failing to make a cogent point, let alone lifting a finger to stop the complete loss of democracy in America.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | June 16, 2025 7:03 PM |
R35 = Tabitha Soren.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | June 16, 2025 7:27 PM |
This surprised me:
Trump's first term from Jan. 1, 2017 - May 31, 2017: 4,641 protests
Trump's second term from Jan. 1, 2025 - May 31, 2025: 14,713 protests
And this was before the No Kings protests.
Americans are not taking the imperial presidency sitting down.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | June 16, 2025 8:13 PM |
Schumer is starting to look like an old reptile who needs retire to Boca Raton. He has zero charisma, and he is not a person who inspires or stimulates others to take action. He actually makes me sleepy when I look at him. Please retire Chuckles, bye bye.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | June 19, 2025 1:21 AM |
Because DNC only care about $$$ and not offending mega donors. Harris raised ONE BILLION DOLLARS and lost. To them it's all about revenue streams not democracy. Citzens United ruling killed democracy in America.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | June 19, 2025 2:57 AM |
Democrats are leaderless and directionless at a time when they could really make gains. The only person who can save the Democratic Party's hopes is Trump.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | June 19, 2025 3:14 AM |
Okay, a lot of the posts here have shifted from blasting the useless, corporate-sucking Dem leaders to trashing the whole party as just as bad as the Republicans. Sorry, that's stealth MAGA. At least R39's last paragraph gets it right.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | June 19, 2025 11:17 AM |
Looks like Obama finally got off the basketball court and had something to say but did he do enough by encouraging the wealthy of the Dem party to forgo the remodeling of their kitchens to be more outspoken against Trump. Hmmm.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | June 19, 2025 12:10 PM |
Already beaten very badly 0-3, now Leaderless, directionless, and depending on Trump to save them ? Nothing defines a loser more than that. If so R46 why are they worth saving ?
“ Vote for the Democrats we are not the worst”
by Anonymous | reply 47 | June 19, 2025 2:10 PM |
Sorry R45 instead
by Anonymous | reply 48 | June 19, 2025 2:11 PM |
R47, flushing out the current leadership (and their thinking) doesn't require scrapping the whole party: we are the party. Do you propose we start a new party from scratch, or just not vote? That's stealth MAGA (as your Trumpoid erratic capitalization and "beaten very badly 0-3" reveals you to be).
by Anonymous | reply 49 | June 19, 2025 2:15 PM |
It’s a simple answer, easy as ABC.
No big donors = no clear marching orders = weak leadership
I will bet that’s the quiet crisis going on. Kamala losing after spending a billion definitely has it’s consequences for future donors and fundraising for Democrats.
No donor momentum → no bold action → no voter energy → even less donor interest. It’s a downward spiral unless they change the game.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | June 19, 2025 2:23 PM |
R49 and you think stating the obvious that Harris Walz lost all 7 battle ground states, plus the Congress, plus the White House , somehow says something about me?
It does it says my money and my vote did absolutely shit for a currently shit leaderless party.
JHC the biggest losers are those so happy because the democrats lost the popular vote but ITO that’s not bad because they kept it close.
That is like Sunny Liston bragging the results against Clay were not as bad as they looked.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | June 19, 2025 2:32 PM |
Trump won votes from Independents and others apart from his racist, sexist, isolationist, conspiracy-loving base because Joe Biden sought a second term. All of us saw what Biden was like when he debated Trump. At the eleventh hour. Biden bowed out. Kamala Harris -- a weak candidate because she could not connect with voters and had a hard time defining a message of why people should have voted for her -- was foisted upon us as the anointed candidate. Biden should have announced he would not seek a second term in 2021 or 2022 at the latest. There should have been primaries.
Blame Biden...his vanity, his wife, his family, and his aides. Democrats lost BIG Time in 2024. They are powerless to do anything right now. Filibustering by the closeted NJ senator accomplished nothing. Getting arrested at Gestapo news conferences and barging into detention centers accomplish nothing.
Get a message that will appeal to the pocket books of Americans. Drive that message home and win elections based on that message.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | June 19, 2025 2:46 PM |
R52 Your message/analysis is tired and dated. There were more people on the streets last Saturday than in any single day protest in American history. The future is here. Refresh your analysis.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | June 19, 2025 2:53 PM |
R53 " tired and dated." is R52 's middle name as she's a Brit Git who thinks this is dynamic 21st century leadership....
by Anonymous | reply 54 | June 19, 2025 2:59 PM |
“The future is here” according to DL
The GOP is in complete power and Democrats are in the streets protesting.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | June 19, 2025 3:01 PM |
[quote]Kamala Harris -- a weak candidate because she could not connect with voters and had a hard time defining a message of why people should have voted for her -- was foisted upon us as the anointed candidate.
If you ever spent time amongst the hoi polloi, you would know there was nothing Kamala could have done to win that election.
She is a black woman, and that in and of itself lost her the election.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | June 19, 2025 3:26 PM |
R53, my analysis still stands. Those were the people NOT the Democratic leadership. The Democrats need to harness that power with a message.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | June 19, 2025 3:33 PM |
Democrats appointed someone to head the ticket who was never able to win a democratic primary then they blame the voters when the appointed ones goes on to lose.
A senator who was an actual decorated war vet might have been a better choice for President or at least for VP. But nope they went for someone as VP who could be attacked effectively with tampons.
Soft and sensitive and illegal immigrant and trans supporting was not what the public was looking for in 2024. And thus the results.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | June 19, 2025 3:38 PM |
[Quote] Your average DLer still supports this type of Dem. They refuse to acknowledge that life sucks for the working class or the poor. They refuse to acknowledge that this is why Democrats lose.
Another “progressive” pretending they invented the key tenets of the Dem party and didn’t alienate voters with their purity tests and buffoonery.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | June 19, 2025 3:40 PM |
The Democratic Party leadership all need to go and be replaced with politicians who are equipped to face head on (not head in sand), effectively communicate and operate in the political climate we are now in. Most importantly they need to know how to communicate as one. The left is at least a decade behind the right in this. The old political era of working with the other side and compromise and negotiation is gone and it won't return for some time - if ever.
People who have to go include Schumer, Jefferies et al and also every single one of the Democratic Party political advisors and political analysts. All the "old guard". They are all heavy baggage and until they are gone the Democratic Party wont stand a chance. If they won't retire or resign of their own free will - then they need to be pushed out or fired. I'm not a particular fan of Hogg but I think that's why the DNC got rid of him because he was trying to get the ball rolling on this. But this just has to be done. Focussing on anything else is pointless. The Democratic Party is at a real low point and I don't think a blue wave in 2026 is guaranteed even as bad as Trump is. We have one more chance to save the US in 2028 and if the Dems don't win then it will be too late to try to fix things in 2032. It will be gone.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | June 19, 2025 3:52 PM |
r53 Democrats have to stop confusing performance art with accomplishing anything. These demonstrations are mere preaching to the choir so that everyone can go home afterwards falsely feeling good about themselves for supposedly saving Democracy by standing in a park holding a sign and yelling for an hour. Then they spend the next four years doing nothing but sitting around sipping their sun tea and bitching to each other about MAGAs. r57 is right: The leadership needs to harness that power with a message; otherwise, these antics have about as much lasting effect as a Feifferish "Dance to Democracy."
by Anonymous | reply 61 | June 19, 2025 3:56 PM |
R61 Time will tell, Pookie. Time will tell.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | June 19, 2025 3:58 PM |
R57 re- post entirely in CAPs we'll then agree with you GRAN
by Anonymous | reply 63 | June 19, 2025 5:06 PM |
They’re busy fiddlin’ like motherfuckers.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | June 19, 2025 5:17 PM |
I wish Pete Buttigieg would speak out more forcefully. He's not an elected official right now, but he can answer Republican lunacy with concrete, well thought out responses. He's been on Fox News twice in his career, and he was given a standing ovation by the Fox studio audience at the end of the broadcast both times. He's probably mulling a White House run, and may be reserved for now. He needs to stand up right now, when we need him. We need reason in our party.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | June 19, 2025 6:36 PM |
[quote]If you ever spent time amongst the hoi polloi, you would know there was nothing Kamala could have done to win that election. She is a black woman, and that in and of itself lost her the election.
The Dems have been telling us for years that the US is a racist and misogynistic country.
So what do they do? They choose a black woman to run for President!
by Anonymous | reply 66 | June 19, 2025 6:48 PM |
Buttigieg is good on cable talk shows. But obviously, winning presidential debates no longer matters. What else does he have to offer? Running a large bureaucracy? Kash Patel is doing that. RFK Jr is doing that. Anyone can do it, it seems.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | June 19, 2025 6:59 PM |
There's a very large gap between running a large bureaucracy and running a large bureaucracy well, R67.
Pete proved himself.as a capable administrator.
Your idols like Patel, RFK II, Hegseth, Patel Gabbard, Noem, and all the other useless pustules in the Trump cabinet have not been in office long enough to render an opinion. But the prognoses of any of these morons achieving any stellar performance ratings is highly doubtful based on their first few months in office, not to mention they were appointed by another jack ass just like them, Donald Trump.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | June 19, 2025 7:07 PM |
Re Kamala & sexism/racism… Explain how Kamala got to be first ever female VP then.
If Dems would listen to what the voters they hemorrhage (including Black men and Latinos) actually say instead of using every opportunity to write everything off as hate, they’d learn that voters thought Dems were too focused on idealogical policing rather than kitchen-table issues.
Of course many Americans are small minded. But we did have people who once voted for President Obama flipping to GOP.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | June 19, 2025 7:08 PM |
We need an unembarrassed, unencumbered Fuck the Rich campaign. And Trump and the Trump Cult make that easy. This is far and away the most corrupt, mobsterish government in U.S. history. Everyone is there to steal, starting of course with Trump and his family. Sometimes it's actually about stealing data, as Elon and Doge were all about, but it is always about stealing. And when they do bother to try actual governing, you wind up with a Big Billionaires Bill which is all about shoveling money into the ever gaping maw of the super rich and fucking over everybody else.
Be clear about that, be blunt about that, and offer an alternative: the rich have gorged, it is time for them to disgorge. You worried about the deficit? start by doubling taxes on the rich, also ramp up auditing and everything else that extracts stolen money. But whatever specific tactics, the overall strategy is clear: fuck the rich and stop always putting their fucking needs and whims at the center of government.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | June 19, 2025 7:15 PM |
[quote]Explain how Kamala got to be first ever female VP then.
Um, she wasn't [italic]elected[/italic] VP.
Just sayin'.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | June 19, 2025 7:17 PM |
R68, it looks like Mayor Pete was shitting the bed with his large bureaucracy, based on air safety. And I don’t actually like Kash Patel or RFK. My point was that traditional, conventional, establishment political skills seem useless right now. Pete is a dinosaur.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | June 19, 2025 7:27 PM |
"The ignorance here is unbelieveable."
So is your spelling, And so is your ignorance, moron.
Kamala Harris WAS ELECTED the first female vice-president on November 7, 2020.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | June 19, 2025 7:28 PM |
It's not the ignorance, it's the indifference. As long as people are arguing about whether or not Kamala was or was not too black to win, they are not coming up with any actual, future, effective message. That's what people seem weirdly indifferent about. Let's just gas on about what Biden should or shouldn't have done in early 2024. To ask Hillary's question, at this point what possible difference does it make?
by Anonymous | reply 74 | June 19, 2025 7:51 PM |
R74 an effective message? Is that the same as popular messages?
No tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no nuke bomb for Iran, $1000 investment account for every newborn American baby, no boys in girls sports, no men in women’s sports, the end of DEI
You can argue against these as public policy but there is no getting around that right now a lot of people will think those are pretty great ideas, let’s call them potential voters 2028.
The same way many former college students ( not everyone with debt just some with college debt ) were given relief by Biden and liked that give away.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | June 19, 2025 8:25 PM |
Democrat John Fetterman is speaking out!
by Anonymous | reply 76 | June 19, 2025 8:29 PM |
Cuomo, if he wins NYC mayoral race, will hopefully be a tough on crime, anti-woke, moderate who will appeal to a broader coalition of working-class Democrats and Republicans and run for POTUS and have the ability to talk to the moderates of both parties to win the electoral college map. He has no other choice if he wants to win.
by Anonymous | reply 77 | June 19, 2025 8:39 PM |
Back to the OP.
The Democrats are IMPOTENT, POWERLESS because Murdoch/Fox/Marketing/Analytics got Trump elected and Republicans an elected majority in the Senate and the House.
There is nothing that Democrats can do but squawk if Republicans exploit their one vote majority in the House with a Senate where Republicans are more bloodthirsty.
They are letting Rich Republicans tell MAGA poors how worthless they are. They are letting Rich Republicans close hundreds of rural hospitals and kick millions of MAGA off of healthcare, and actually take the food out of their mouths by killing SNAP. The only thing Democrats can say is that elections have consequences and this is what you voted for.
I am seeing some journalists actually pointing the finger at Murdoch/Fox/Marketing/Analytics ans split-screening the propaganda blow job they are doing to cover their ass. They are giving MAGA a Murdoch/Fox/Marketing/Analytics scapegoat.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | June 19, 2025 8:40 PM |
we no longer have public servants. we have an industry now of selfish hollow vessels performing for money. no one is coming to save us.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | June 19, 2025 8:46 PM |
What we need is another strongly worded letter.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | June 19, 2025 8:47 PM |
Sorry, but we still have elected Democrats.
by Anonymous | reply 81 | June 19, 2025 8:47 PM |
[quote] $1000 investment account for every newborn American baby
Why stop there? Universal Basic Income for all Americans, paid by taxing the rich. Should be pretty popular. Also, arrest corrupt rich cunts who are stealing everything in sight and cheating on billions of taxes owed.
by Anonymous | reply 82 | June 19, 2025 8:57 PM |
The tragic truth is we may just need to save ourselves r79.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | June 19, 2025 9:11 PM |
Cuomo shouldn't bother if he's just going to be another whore for the rich r77. No amount of hating the trans and the "woke" is going to satisfy people who are sick of being ripped off by every rich fucker in the country, and their whores in Washington D.C.
by Anonymous | reply 84 | June 19, 2025 9:16 PM |
The fate of our democracy depends upon proudly holding up paddles! Take [italic]that[/italic], Republicans!
by Anonymous | reply 85 | June 19, 2025 9:20 PM |
Maybe Chuck Schumer can send a letter to Maria. 🙄
by Anonymous | reply 86 | June 19, 2025 9:30 PM |
R65 R67 Buttigieg has been very visible and effective on podcast/streaming sites. And posting, directly and strongly calling "bullshit" on a lot of the MAGA workplan.
I suspect a lot of DL's older demographic aren't very connected to the media where 2026 is going to be fought.
by Anonymous | reply 87 | June 20, 2025 12:26 AM |
R67, I may be part of "DL's older demographic," but I'm connected. Not that I listen to podcasts or subscribe to Substack, but I stay informed. Unfortunately, many no longer do that, whatever their demographic..
by Anonymous | reply 88 | June 20, 2025 12:57 AM |
While we’re kicking out the old and ineffective, make sure we include Bernie Sanders. The old blowhard scold couldn’t even write a complete bill for his vaunted Medicare for All plan. His bill spelled out all of the benefits he desired, but never included a funding mechanism.
by Anonymous | reply 89 | June 20, 2025 1:21 AM |
There were a lot of us out on Saturday. We’ll start taking the reins from these guys before they let them kill us.
by Anonymous | reply 90 | June 20, 2025 6:09 AM |
R90. Could you explain what that exactly means with some specifics. It reads like a DL bumper sticker not an actual plan,.
by Anonymous | reply 91 | June 20, 2025 7:49 AM |
[quote]Where are the Democrats?
They’re still working on a plan to fuck up 2026. What will they double down on this time? Trans kids? Pronouns? Wokeness? Black victimhood?
by Anonymous | reply 92 | June 20, 2025 8:17 AM |
[quote]It reads like a DL bumper sticker not an actual plan
For a VERY large bumper.
by Anonymous | reply 93 | June 20, 2025 9:17 AM |
It is maddening. Most of them are truly failing to meet the moment. Ken Martin especially (chair of the DNC).
by Anonymous | reply 94 | June 20, 2025 9:24 AM |
R17 I know someone on the Hill who works for a Dem and unfortunately from what I have heard I don’t think there is a comprehensive master plan. Keep pushing your dems for more action they really do pay attention to calls especially.
by Anonymous | reply 95 | June 20, 2025 11:41 AM |
R95, there's so much dismayed "buzz" coming out to that effect. It doesn't bode well for 2026.
In the absence of strong leadership from the top, each House Dem and Senate Dem would be wise to save their own neck and double down, triple down on 'home turf' connections, showing up, etc. Teddy Kennedy back in MA where I'm from was the KING of always showing up, putting in the local and regional time and footwork. He was seemingly everywhere... and had PR people making sure it was known that he was showing up, that he cared about his constituents, especially on anything that had the potential to hurt or harm the local economy at large. For a Brahmin, Teddy K knew a ton of detail about the New England fishing industry. That kind of thing. It can make all the difference. A growing attack line on AOC here in New York City is that she's so keen on 'going national' that she is neglecting her constituents.
by Anonymous | reply 96 | June 20, 2025 2:42 PM |
Ugh, depressing r96, well not the part about needing to spend time with constituents, which of course they should. And that alone might get some of the Dems to stop dicking around and maybe give a shit about the growing fascism and the relentless stealing by the already rich, cause their constituents certainly do.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | June 20, 2025 3:13 PM |
I'm so tired of this "What are Democrats doing?" - a LOT - you're just not paying attention. They don't have control in Congress.
It's blaming Democrats for not stopping Republicans - instead of blaming Republicans for this constant illegal bullshit.
You should have gotten off your fucking asses and voted - but no, Dems didn't turn out in 2024 in the numbers they did in 2020.
Dems are dealing with a party of liars, cheaters, manipulators who say one thing and do another. You can NOT trust them - we cannot work across the aisle, because they refuse to do so.
Just shut the hell up and get out and vote.
by Anonymous | reply 98 | June 20, 2025 3:18 PM |
It is hard to have a Master Plan when each day the game changes. What is happening with Ice in California is over the top. And the Judges keep giving in to Trump. Blatant stuff is happening. Congress can’t get in to see the migrants that have been rounded up. Now they are saying that congressmen/women have to give 72 Hours notice to see them and STILL can be turned away. They can just start shooting and killing each day’s round ups and disposing of them and who would know? A Alex Padilla and the guy from New York get shackled and thrown to the ground and NO Republican senators say “That’s Enough!” …. The murders in Minnesota and the republicans make jokes and conspiracy theories. Terry Moran puts out a tweet about Miller and Trump and ABC fires him after 28 years? …..HOW do democrats fight this insanity?
by Anonymous | reply 99 | June 20, 2025 3:33 PM |
From John Hopkins:
To Every Democrat in Elected Office: This Isn’t a Memo. It’s a Call-Up Notice. Let me save you the guesswork. This is going to sting. But, and with all due respect… if you're in a leadership seat and swore an oath to protect and defend this democracy…then sit down…shut up… and listen—because the time for soft-shoe statements and ribbon-cutting courage is over.
You say you support the military. Great. Then let me give you a reminder of what real sacrifice looks like. There are Americans—Medal of Honor recipients—who’ve thrown themselves on live grenades to protect others. Who’ve run headfirst into machine-gun fire just to drag a bleeding soldier 15 feet back to cover.
These weren’t gestures. These weren’t well-timed press conferences. They were instinctual acts of unflinching commitment. The total and complete commitment behind this kind of action is what this moment demands from you.
Because here’s the hard truth: you're not matching the intensity of the crisis. Right now, America doesn’t need more panel appearances. It needs legal warfare. Lawsuits. Filings. Challenges. Nonstop political combat.
But what do we see? Mostly posturing. Speeches. Carefully scripted outrage wrapped in donor-tested language. That’s not grit. That’s brand maintenance.
People like to defend you. I hear it all the time—"What else do you want them to do?!" My answer? Every. Goddamn. Thing. Every legal tool. Every procedural move. Every unconventional tactic. All of it.
That’s what war looks like. And make no mistake—we are in one. You were not elected to be celebrities. You were elected to serve. To fight. And maybe you never thought you’d be on the front lines of a democratic collapse—but you are.
You’re in it. Which means you don’t get to opt out. You don’t get to weigh the polls and decide whether defending liberty is good for your re-election prospects.
You get to decide whether you’re going to rise like the soldiers you say you admire—or fold like a press release under pressure.
So here’s your assignment: channel the resolve of those who gave everything on foreign soil and meet this moment with matching intensity. Stop asking what’s safe. Ask what’s necessary.
Because if you're not prepared to do that, you don’t deserve the seat you're sitting in.
Respectfully,
Jack Jacl Hopkins
by Anonymous | reply 100 | June 21, 2025 8:43 PM |
*sorry, I meant JACK Hopkins
by Anonymous | reply 101 | June 21, 2025 8:45 PM |
Bravo R100! I’m going to save, add my two cents, and send to every Democrat who begs me for money(a lot) without doing anything to earn it. We are way past politics as usual here. Way past. We are in the middle of a fascist take over. The midterms, if held, may be too late. DO SOMETHING! I certainly have, as I don’t want to lose my country.
by Anonymous | reply 102 | June 21, 2025 9:00 PM |
We need a more centrist AOC to spring out of somewhere and capture the nation's attention.
by Anonymous | reply 103 | June 21, 2025 10:01 PM |
Should I call Chuck Schumer or that Ken whatever worthless pussy cupcake to give them a piece of my mind? Fucking pussies
by Anonymous | reply 104 | June 21, 2025 10:01 PM |
They’re busy defending “trans kids.”
by Anonymous | reply 105 | June 22, 2025 8:42 AM |
It’s Johns Hopkins for the educated. John Hopkins for the rest, or Jack in the case of DL.
Nothing makes more sense than to compare draft dogging service evading Trump like military avoiders like the majority of a certain site to MoH awardees who jumped on a frag to save team mates.
by Anonymous | reply 106 | June 22, 2025 9:37 AM |
They are still debating which pronouns to use after their signatures on strongly worded letters.
by Anonymous | reply 107 | June 22, 2025 12:08 PM |
[quote] It’s Johns Hopkins for the educated. John Hopkins for the rest, or Jack in the case of DL. Nothing makes more sense than to compare draft dogging service evading Trump
You have a lot of nerve, R106, giving people shit about incorrect references to Johns Hopkins when you can't even spell draft [bold]dodging.[/bold]
by Anonymous | reply 108 | June 22, 2025 12:42 PM |
r105, stop with the trans kids, they are defending parents rights of citizens.
I remember when it was the filthy ass fuckers.
It is a war to create second class citizens.
by Anonymous | reply 109 | June 22, 2025 1:25 PM |
We already have second class citizens: ask any woman.
by Anonymous | reply 110 | June 22, 2025 3:18 PM |
r110, do not be a dumbass. Anybody who is not a white evangelical male is a second-class citizen.
THEY are the people we beg to give us our rights.
Women, Blacks, Latinos, LGBT+, legal immigrants ARE all Second-class Citizens according to the Children of the Plantation owners and let me add one class that whites do not understand...POOR WHITES. They understand the poors, but not poor whites.
by Anonymous | reply 111 | June 22, 2025 3:42 PM |
[quote]let me add one class that whites do not understand...POOR WHITES. They understand the poors, but not poor whites.
Don't even think about saying this about me.
Better yet -- come and hang out with me here in Deplorable Haven, FL!! I dare you. Seriously.
And women have [italic]always[/italic] been second class citizens, since the beginning of time.
by Anonymous | reply 112 | June 22, 2025 3:54 PM |
r112, how much of a poor dumbass do you have to be, to exert white privilege over being poor?
by Anonymous | reply 113 | June 22, 2025 4:28 PM |
Dems are too busy arguing over which group has it worse, rather than uniting to fight the cause - The Republicans. Stupid in-fighting will result in defeat.
by Anonymous | reply 114 | June 22, 2025 4:54 PM |
^Sorry " worst"
by Anonymous | reply 115 | June 22, 2025 4:56 PM |
[quote] We need a more centrist AOC to spring out of somewhere and capture the nation's attention
If Haley Stevens didn't have that very think Michigan accent(it's thicker than Whitmer's accent) or those weird physical mannerisms (I suspect she has a mild form of cerebral palsy), she could be a centrist version of AOC. Stevens has a humble and down to earth attitude and understands working class people because her dad was a school teacher and her parents owned small businesses.
It's comes back to appearances and mannerisms, many people write Stevens off as a kooky Midwestern woman.
by Anonymous | reply 116 | June 22, 2025 5:25 PM |
R114 And MAGA never, ever separates people into groups and names their relative merits.
by Anonymous | reply 117 | June 22, 2025 6:54 PM |
R117, but when summoned, Republicans stand together. Think about how many Dems stayed home in 2024 because they were offended by something or didn't think there was something in it for them or their group.
by Anonymous | reply 118 | June 22, 2025 7:31 PM |