Crappy characters given their own 90 minutes in the sun. MacGruber, Night at the Roxbury, Superstar... Hollywood money laundering at its best.
SNL movie spin-offs. Why?
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 4, 2025 12:52 AM |
Just this week I remembered there was an “It’s…Pat!” movie also. I’d forgotten all about that but was pulling up old SNL Pat skits from YouTube. I always heard the movie sucked so I’ve never seen it.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 1, 2025 10:57 PM |
Wayne’s World was hilarious.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 1, 2025 11:41 PM |
The Coneheads. Oooph.
There was also a Stuart Smalley movie (that was actually pretty funny).
by Anonymous | reply 3 | June 1, 2025 11:59 PM |
Wasn't there supposed to be a Mr Bill movie?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 2, 2025 12:13 AM |
R4 I think there was.?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 2, 2025 12:19 AM |
I wouldn't mind a movie based on "The Ambiguously Gay Duo".
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 2, 2025 12:26 AM |
R4 If so, please share the title.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | June 2, 2025 2:21 AM |
Parts of Superstar were funny.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 2, 2025 2:22 AM |
The two cheerleaders - Cheri Oteri and Will Ferrell - might have carried a 90 minute movie.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | June 2, 2025 2:24 AM |
I actually liked MacGruber.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 2, 2025 2:34 AM |
Doctor Who should have regenerated into Pat
I would have started watching it again
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 2, 2025 2:46 AM |
Me too, r10. It's not for everyone but I thought it was funny and well-made. Val Kilmer was a good sport.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | June 2, 2025 10:11 PM |
It made more financial sense in the 90s when entertainment options were a little more limited
by Anonymous | reply 13 | June 2, 2025 10:27 PM |
SNL sucks so of course, their movies did too.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | June 2, 2025 10:34 PM |
That Coneheads movie was abysmal. All these talented people and it’s a massive pile of crap. At least screenwriters Bonnie and Terry Turner redeemed themselves a few years later with The Brady Bunch Movie.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | June 3, 2025 12:41 AM |
People are dumb and they enjoy garbage
by Anonymous | reply 16 | June 3, 2025 12:51 AM |
Why? Too much money that needed to be spent quickly. These ridiculous movies were the answer.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 3, 2025 7:37 PM |
OP doesn't know what "money laundering" is, does he?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | June 3, 2025 7:38 PM |
That’s exactly it, R13. The film industry of 2025 is barely even in the same business as the film industry of the 90s. Then, it made all the sense in the world to cram known IP into a feature length film that would make some money at the box office, then even more on VHS and cable. Now, much less so.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 3, 2025 8:05 PM |
If we had to endure Pat and MacGruber, I'm surprised we didn't also get subjected to Debbie Downer and Dooneese.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | June 3, 2025 8:08 PM |
Wayne's World and Blue Brothers were the only ones that were good (and only the first ones, not the sequels)
by Anonymous | reply 21 | June 3, 2025 8:12 PM |
Love Wayne's World and Blues Brothers..
I like Gilda Live as well. It has its moments.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | June 3, 2025 9:35 PM |
I assume they thought they'd make money given SNL's popularity.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | June 4, 2025 12:22 AM |
I'm still waiting for the movie version of Fred Garvin, male prostitute.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | June 4, 2025 12:26 AM |
Okay, Jodie, I would never ordinarily say this, but... is there any way you can get to a pound cake?
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 4, 2025 12:52 AM |