This was the slowest moving movie I've ever seen in my life. Anthony Hopkins was good. Still not sure what it was about. Death or something?
They really did try, but Claire Forlani never happened.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 20, 2025 8:57 PM |
Shitty film all the way around. The fact it lasts 3 hours makes it even worse.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 20, 2025 9:00 PM |
Yeah, she never happened.
I do remember I cried and cried at the end. At least she got to say goodbye to her father. 🥺😭
I saw it in the theater with a friend back then. She kept looking at me to see if I was okay.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 20, 2025 9:01 PM |
Pitt's patois scene. Absolute shit.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 20, 2025 9:06 PM |
I recall when the movie came out, Entertainment Weekly, or one of the entertainment rags did a quick interview with the screenwriter. He said he didn't know how they managed to make the film three hours. His script was 125 page long.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 20, 2025 9:45 PM |
You would have been better off watch the original, Death Takes A Holiday.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 20, 2025 9:50 PM |
I burst out laughing in the theater when the obvious dummy of Brad Pitt is hit by a van at the beginning of the movie. All downhill from there.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 20, 2025 9:53 PM |
I liked it ok, but Claire Forlani was too squinty.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 20, 2025 10:00 PM |
I watched it for the first time a few months ago and liked it. It's the kind of feel-good drama that they no longer make. Everyone complaining about the length is right, it didn't need to be a solid 3 hours. Can't see myself ever rewatching it.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 21, 2025 12:18 AM |
In 2017, Forlani revealed that she had "escaped" Harvey Weinstein five times, including twice in a hotel, and that she had had a "disgusting" experience with the producer.
She's continued to work, but very routine stuff.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 21, 2025 12:28 AM |
R5 Well everyone is speaking extremely slowly. This was also pre -911 when Americans enjoyed more of a sense of peace, and pre cell phones too.
It's the last of it's kind.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 21, 2025 2:15 AM |
[R6], that's one of my favorite movies although it's quite stagey and outdated.
There was also a TV Movie of the Week remake starring Monte Markham and Yvette Mimieux. Hello
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 21, 2025 2:24 AM |
Claire Forlorni...
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 21, 2025 11:35 AM |
R6 Brad Pitt also bought Fredric March’s house
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 21, 2025 11:39 AM |
"I just watched Meet Joe Black"
You were warned, OP
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 21, 2025 11:50 PM |
If only Brad had played "Meet Joe Black" nude, he might have been watchable...
by Anonymous | reply 16 | June 8, 2025 1:44 AM |
“when the obvious dummy of Brad Pitt is hit by a van”
Alas
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 8, 2025 1:47 AM |
[quote] I watched it for the first time a few months ago and liked it. It's the kind of feel-good drama that they no longer make. Everyone complaining about the length is right, it didn't need to be a solid 3 hours. Can't see myself ever rewatching it.
I have watched a few times over the years. I like it, but it's just too long.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | June 8, 2025 2:21 AM |
I love the location they used for that mansion and the estate. One of my favorite scenes comes towards the end when Marcia Gay Harden's character, who has longed for her father's approval through the entire film, is finally valdiated by him. She was outstanding in that scene (Hopkins was just as good too).
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 8, 2025 2:28 AM |
Isn't Jeffrey Tambor supposed to be gay?
by Anonymous | reply 20 | June 8, 2025 2:37 AM |
Pitt was at the peak of his beauty in this film.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | June 8, 2025 2:41 AM |
Pitt was simply beautiful in this. But, yeah. It was a dud for sure.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | June 8, 2025 3:35 AM |
I had this on vhs format. With no remote, I had to squat in front of the player fast-forwarding all the non-Brad content every time I watched.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | June 8, 2025 5:42 AM |
[quote]Pitt was simply beautiful in this.
I think this is the key to why this was three hours long because I recall while watching this dreck as a kid, a thought occurred to me – what if they made this whole movie around Brad being in his prime? But the lead just standing around pretty does not a movie make.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | June 8, 2025 5:51 AM |
Is this streaming anywhere?
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 8, 2025 3:35 PM |
The scene where they make love is good because Pitts body was at its peak.
I didn’t care for his hair in this.
It too long, Pitt isn’t up to the challenge, but it’s still one I’ll watch every now and then. 90s nostalgia is powerful with us millennials.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | June 8, 2025 6:18 PM |
He should have been a little more naked.
Years later he'd be accused of drunkenly beating his wife and kids on a plane.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | June 9, 2025 3:57 AM |