Why are they front page news?
It's the new front in the culture wars, that's way.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | January 7, 2025 10:31 PM |
in the scheme of things gay bashings are pretty rare too.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | January 7, 2025 10:35 PM |
Discussing this is literal murder!
by Anonymous | reply 3 | January 7, 2025 10:46 PM |
It's a distraction from the vastly more urgent, difficult issues (the economy, wars, taxation, health care, the environment, etc.).
by Anonymous | reply 4 | January 7, 2025 10:51 PM |
I wonder why they didn’t break it down by year?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | January 7, 2025 10:57 PM |
I feel so badly for plain women these days. Half the time I can't decide if they just have hit by a fence post face or they're a man trying to pass.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | January 7, 2025 10:59 PM |
Because it's a psyop meant to disenfranchise the left and distract the working class from organizing around economic/labor justice.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | January 7, 2025 11:01 PM |
Because conservatives like to scapegoat minorities. They exaggerate the number of trans people to make it seem as if they are "taking over"
by Anonymous | reply 8 | January 7, 2025 11:04 PM |
R2, They're more common than trans murders or suicides.
Yet they aren't front page news and don't make a ripple at all anywhere
by Anonymous | reply 9 | January 7, 2025 11:07 PM |
Why has this become the civil rights movement 2.0 amongst white leftists if the number is so small?
by Anonymous | reply 10 | January 7, 2025 11:12 PM |
It's easy to make the left look crazy on this issue, so the right is exploiting it.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | January 7, 2025 11:12 PM |
The left does themselves no favors by promoting this shit as "brave and stunning ".
Apparently bravery is a guy with a beard in a ball gown walking the red carpet. It used to be the guys who landed in Iwo Jima.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | January 7, 2025 11:24 PM |
R10 Because they are determined to be on "the right side of history" and be allies. No questions asked and no counter points are to be considered because only facists/racists/Trumpers would ever be anything but 100% supportive of the trans rights movement even if that includes sex change operations for 14-year olds.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | January 7, 2025 11:27 PM |
It's easy to [bold]trigger transphobic lunatics[/bold] on this issue, so the right is exploiting it.
Fixed your typo, R11.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | January 7, 2025 11:43 PM |
"This small group has garnered attention from republicans"
What a lol cow that is. Yeah ok.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | January 7, 2025 11:52 PM |
just like the trans activists took over the gays, the nonbinary lunatics took over the trans.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | January 7, 2025 11:56 PM |
[quote]It's a distraction from the vastly more urgent, difficult issues (the economy, wars, taxation, health care, the environment, etc.).
Was the focus on conversion therapy also a distraction from the vastly more urgent, difficult issues?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | January 8, 2025 12:03 AM |
R17 There maybe few teen trans because their parents didn't send them to doctors who pumped them with drugs at ten. If you "think" you're the opposite sex, wait until your of legal age (18) to make the decision. Jazz Jennings is victim of a mother who couldn't get son, Jaron, to be a girl fast enough. Today Jazz is an emotional mess.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | January 8, 2025 12:08 AM |
They must have all died in the trans genocide we were told was going on.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | January 8, 2025 12:11 AM |
GLAAD and HRC grifter cunts keep pushing it.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | January 8, 2025 12:27 AM |
[quote] The left does themselves no favors by promoting this shit as "brave and stunning ".
Which is why it’s so appealing to kids. It gets them lauded. Then you have Anette Bening up there on stage saying that the most interesting thing about her is that she has a trans child. Mothers also love this shit. Munchhausen’s by proxy.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | January 8, 2025 12:29 AM |
[quote]even if that includes sex change operations for 14-year olds.
Which it *doesn't* as you (and we all) know r13. LoL, you can stop spreading your Magat shit now.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | January 8, 2025 12:33 AM |
For the propagandist at R23:
You're a fucking idiot.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | January 8, 2025 12:49 AM |
R23 the activists have consisently pushed for zero age limits on any of these trans-related surgeries and medications (puberty blockers). You're falling into the trap of not seeing the truth because you think it's too outragerous to be true. But it is true!
by Anonymous | reply 25 | January 8, 2025 12:54 AM |
Funny thing. I distinctly remember one presidential candidate carpet bombing social media with absolute shrieking horseshit about how his opponent would force teenagers to transition against their parent's wishes.
(which she never did.)
And winning because of it.
"Both sides" my hairy Irish ass.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | January 8, 2025 12:57 AM |
Yet this is the deciding issue of our time… How much fucking sense does that make?
This is where we are.
I was really glad to read J. K. Rowling say that she would not accept apologies from Watson or Radcliffe.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | January 8, 2025 1:04 AM |
OH good, Hormone disrupting chemicals can be released at a much greater rate.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | January 8, 2025 1:11 AM |
what hormones or gender affirming care? All the kids do today is SAY that they're transgender and everyone has to take notice!
(this is based solely on my experience dealing with high school students)
by Anonymous | reply 29 | January 8, 2025 1:18 AM |
[quote]It used to be the guys who landed in Iwo Jima.
Who were they wearing?
by Anonymous | reply 30 | January 8, 2025 1:18 AM |
[quote]r29 = (this is based solely on my experience dealing with high school students)
Sure, Jan.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | January 8, 2025 1:58 AM |
The whole trans thing is the boogieman bullshit of this decade. Next decade it will e some other nonsense. I’m so fucking sick off all of you cunts
by Anonymous | reply 32 | January 8, 2025 2:01 AM |
I guess you've never heard of Terri Schkievio's case involving just one person at the time OP =
by Anonymous | reply 33 | January 8, 2025 7:06 AM |
R13 America's history has included putting 12 & 14 years old to death
so why aren't they old enough to fix their own bodies if possible?
by Anonymous | reply 34 | January 8, 2025 7:09 AM |
[quote] so why aren't they old enough to fix their own bodies if possible?
They’re not old enough to consent to sex but they’re old enough to consent to castration?
by Anonymous | reply 35 | January 8, 2025 7:15 AM |
^ Those under 18 don't have any kids taken away from them (when they procreate under the age of 18)
so if they're clearly old enough to raise kid/s then why aren't they allowed to fix their bodies?
Also, US kids can get emancipated from their parents too so...
by Anonymous | reply 36 | January 8, 2025 7:39 AM |
"Fix their bodies" my sides...why can't they drink too? And get tattoos?
by Anonymous | reply 37 | January 8, 2025 7:23 PM |
[quote]then why aren't they allowed to fix their bodies?
"fix their bodies"
It's like Orwell's "newspeak".
by Anonymous | reply 38 | January 8, 2025 7:47 PM |
This girl died after years of "fixing" her body, tons of money spent (taxpayers), painful infections, necrosis, coma, and death. I think she started this shit at like 14.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | January 8, 2025 8:00 PM |
OP it’s something the rightwing has been doing in America since Reaganism. Social media added her fuel to the fire.
Defacto does it here constantly. It’s the logical fallacy of “faulty generalization.”
In other words, “look here’s a crime that happened on the nyc subway. Liberal cities are therefore dangerous failures.”
Here it’s “we are sterilizing and annihilating a generation of youth — THANKS DUMBOCRATS!!!” because ten kids got hormones.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not pro crime and I am given pause by sex change in minors. But we can see the way they try to build a condemnatory argument based on individual events. And people who aren’t very bright fall for it.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | January 8, 2025 8:11 PM |
^^^ jet fuel not her fuel.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 8, 2025 8:11 PM |
Fuck you trans-hating cunts.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | January 8, 2025 8:13 PM |
From the OP:
Horrifying: young boys twerk for adult men in heavily gender segregated Afghanistan
Call me .
Horrifying: young boys twerk for adult men in heavily gender segregated Afghanistan
If you can't be with the one you love, honey- love the one you're with
by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 8, 2025 8:14 PM |
I suspect transgender surgery and meds will be phased out soon. State by state will outlaw it. I can't imagine Trump will allow it much longer.
- Suspicious Mind
by Anonymous | reply 44 | January 8, 2025 8:16 PM |
[quote]Here it’s “we are sterilizing and annihilating a generation of youth — THANKS DUMBOCRATS!!!” because ten kids got hormones.
^ Our resident nut case with his bizarre "Defacto" psychosis chimes in with his usual idiocy.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | January 8, 2025 8:18 PM |
It is a buzz word hot button issue they use to ignite their base. Here in Ohio they constantly ran anti-sherrod brown ads saying he voted for men in teen girls lockerroom and competing in high school sports...(he didn't btw they just flat out lied). Honest to god there are people who post all the time about God fearing Trump stopping boys being changed into girls in schools - like it was happening all the time. These idiots who gave him power are dumb as shit.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | January 8, 2025 8:25 PM |