Facebook is getting rid of fact-checkers
Meta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a 'community notes' system similar to X.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a series of major changes to the company's moderation policies and practices, saying that the election felt like a "cultural tipping point."
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 79 | January 9, 2025 3:25 PM
|
There is no reason to use this product
by Anonymous | reply 1 | January 7, 2025 1:04 PM
|
There is no reason to order from Amazon or maintain an account on Twitter
by Anonymous | reply 2 | January 7, 2025 1:06 PM
|
I have an IPhone and I am due for an upgrade. There's no reason for me to continue to use Apple products
by Anonymous | reply 3 | January 7, 2025 1:13 PM
|
It is a cultural tipping point. We have to be done with Zuckerberg and all the others who brought this about.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | January 7, 2025 1:19 PM
|
There’s this video game called Metal Gear Solid 2. At the end of it you realize you’re being manipulated by an AI created by the American deep state/oligarchy for the purpose of mass control. It explains to you that the plan is to flood networks and media with trivial, irrelevant, junk food style information. This creates a population that can no longer think critically or assess the credibility of information. Then it explains how by monitoring your behavior, their algorithms will know everything about you, and therefore curate your media environment to control your behavior. That only elites have the right to shape how the world is seen and remembered. It talks about how the combination of information control and personal profiling creates total mind control - assuming the AI knows you well enough to accurately predict your reaction to various stimuli. think it was developed in 2001 or 2002. I think about that ending all the time, the evil AI describing not some fictional dystopian future but what is now our present reality.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | January 7, 2025 1:31 PM
|
What does he mean by "cultural tipping point"?
If you can't beat them, join them?
by Anonymous | reply 7 | January 7, 2025 1:36 PM
|
He means stop using his product.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | January 7, 2025 1:41 PM
|
Meta is a joke. I’ve flagged explicit nudity and actual porn to see what would happen, only to get a response that community standards weren’t violated and to just block the content. So what exactly are the community standards, then? I recently deleted my Threads because I thought - no, I’m done with the rage and doom scrolling. Insta and facebook are next. We’re all being manipulated by billionaire tech bros who really don’t give a shit about humanity.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | January 7, 2025 1:49 PM
|
I deleted all Meta accounts last year. I missed them a lot less than I thought I would. Only downside is discovering how a couple of friendships I had depended on those platforms to exist. While it wasn't pleasant to find that out, I'm glad I did rather than in a more nasty or costly way.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | January 7, 2025 1:57 PM
|
[quote]So what exactly are the community standards, then?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 12 | January 7, 2025 2:01 PM
|
Never forget: FB was a project originally invented by an incel to "rate" women who wouldn't have fucked him.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | January 7, 2025 2:59 PM
|
“At one point, Zuckerberg and other attendees stood, hand over heart, as the club played a rendition of the national anthem sung by imprisoned defendants who are accused of crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot”
by Anonymous | reply 14 | January 7, 2025 3:10 PM
|
Lord knows Zuck can't afford to pay fact-checkers.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | January 7, 2025 3:20 PM
|
So I guess this was a requirement from the incoming administration in order to dismiss the existing case and "avoid" further scrutiny from a revamped FTC?
Capitulating in advance. I expect nothing less from "men" like Zuck.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | January 7, 2025 3:24 PM
|
They don't need further scrutiny from the FTC. All the FTC has to do is say Meta is in violation of the 30 year consent decree they filed after the Cambridge Analytica scandal and they're shut down.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 17 | January 7, 2025 3:32 PM
|
Not filed, signed. Sorry.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | January 7, 2025 3:33 PM
|
Will he save space for trans women of color to still be seen and heard?
by Anonymous | reply 19 | January 7, 2025 4:31 PM
|
They won’t be using professional fact checkers, having found them to be inherently non-objective. There will still be fact checking by the community.
It’s good to be against authoritarian censorship and to embrace free speech.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | January 7, 2025 4:58 PM
|
No, he'll save space for Adrain Dittman and numerous right wing bots.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | January 7, 2025 5:05 PM
|
[quote] It’s good to be against authoritarian censorship and to embrace free speech.
Are you one of those "free speech absolutists", by any chance? Did you pay for a blue check mark on X? Do your free speech principles apply to criticizing or making fun of Elon Musk and his associates? I think I know the answers to all my questions already...
by Anonymous | reply 22 | January 7, 2025 5:08 PM
|
I’m all for fact checking, but did it make any difference? Deplorables see it as vindication and validation when they are proven wrong.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | January 7, 2025 5:09 PM
|
These Tech giants are like virtual nation states. They make their own rules now. How long till they get their own military but why do that when they can get the taxpayer to pay for their military without having to give anything.It's politicians that have delivered us to them.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | January 7, 2025 5:15 PM
|
Except they are showing their fear of Trump, so how exactly are they making their own rules? Trump is upending a lot of precedents that Democrats can ignore if they regain power.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | January 7, 2025 5:22 PM
|
[quote] I recently deleted my Threads because I thought - no, I’m done with the rage and doom scrolling. Insta and facebook are next.
You can’t delete Threads without deleting your Instagram.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | January 7, 2025 5:25 PM
|
I had much the same experience, R11.
And just as you say, it wasn’t a pleasant discovery but it was an important one.
There’s a kind of hyperbole that develops in social media that can pass for genuine sentiment — and users take that as reality at their peril. Last week on Facebook a guy told me he “loves” me. He doesn’t love me and he meant no harm. He experienced a brief jolt of fellow feeling at reading something I posted and wanted to let me know. And that was absolutely all.
If I needed a real friend in an emergency this particular guy wouldn’t even recognize my face.
Once you step back from those platforms it’s stunning to see how many “friends” are barely even casual acquaintances!
by Anonymous | reply 27 | January 7, 2025 5:26 PM
|
R24 How long? Musk and Thiel are already deeply tied to the military industrial complex.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | January 7, 2025 5:45 PM
|
[quote] What does he mean by "cultural tipping point"?
[quote] If you can't beat them, join them?
This is exactly how I interpreted this statement.
But did Zuckerberg really want to "beat them" in the first place?
Sounds like he was with "them" all along, and Trump's election gave him permission to do it.
Democrats were the only ones standing in the way of regulating social media.
Now that's done.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | January 7, 2025 5:48 PM
|
A lot of people point to Fox News as the sources of all the disinformation, but it's really Facebook. It's the main source of information for many Boomers and GenXers. This is not good.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | January 7, 2025 5:50 PM
|
Kara Swisher:
(Zuckerberg's) video is appalling to impugn fact checkers like that. He could use all the tools if he actually cared and X is now a toxic waste dump. One thing is true: Fact checking does not work on a platform that cannot be sued and has been built to advantage the liars.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | January 7, 2025 5:56 PM
|
I'm rubbing my forehead after watching that video at R33.
I fucking give up.
I just don't know what to do any more.
There's really nothing we CAN do.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | January 7, 2025 6:07 PM
|
Mark Zuckerberg is bending the knee and kissing Trump's ass.
Lies will now go unchecked on Facebook and Instagram. Zuckerberg is following the example of Twitter.
"Community checking" simply means that others can say you're not telling the truth rather than Zuckerberg removing the post because it is a lie.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | January 7, 2025 6:15 PM
|
Zolan Kanno-Youngs reporting on this morning's press rally for The New York Times, January 7, 2025:
[quote]"Trump says Meta's decision to end its fact-checking program is most likely in response to his past threats against the company."
Oy.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | January 7, 2025 6:19 PM
|
[quote] Except they are showing their fear of Trump, so how exactly are they making their own rules?
What the company is saying appears to indicate that it was a fear of the current administration and that associated culture that pushed them to do the censorship they have engaged in. It looks like now they are shifting to where they would like to be if given a choice, so no longer acting out of fear. It makes sense that a social media platform would much prefer not to censor political views, since it would be crippling one of the important uses of such platforms.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | January 7, 2025 7:33 PM
|
They prefer not to censor “political views” like eating the dogs, vaccines cause autism, and ivermectin cures Covid. The reason their fact checking seemed political is simple. Reality has a well-known liberal bias.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | January 7, 2025 7:37 PM
|
“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.”
Preach, gurrrrrrl! Also, got a tampon I can borrow?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 39 | January 7, 2025 8:01 PM
|
First they came for the trans...
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 40 | January 7, 2025 8:07 PM
|
Honestly, who cares? If you believe what's on social media without more research on your part, you're an idiot.
This is all because of GOP pressure. It is focused on saying whatever it wants without any checks.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 7, 2025 8:10 PM
|
My facebook page has just become one where I forward funny memes. I don't include any personal information about what I'm doing or where I'm going.
It's rather worthless entertainment
by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 7, 2025 8:16 PM
|
I’m still unconvinced that this changes much. There are trolls dedicated to attacking Anne Frank who continue to post. It was already bad,
by Anonymous | reply 44 | January 7, 2025 8:40 PM
|
Facebook works best when you really tailor your Friends list to your close friends and relatives, not to everyone you're ever met.
I took a 400 person list and brought to down to my closest 60. Much better experience that way. These are people who truly care about you and your life and you care about them
by Anonymous | reply 45 | January 7, 2025 8:44 PM
|
[quote] Honestly, who cares?
[quote] I’m still unconvinced that this changes much
Yeah, just the US Presidential Election.
No big deal.
Look at how well that's working out for us.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | January 7, 2025 9:21 PM
|
Zuckerberg has always been a DORK.
He is a nerd who wants to be part of the popular crowd.
The only thing he doesn't realize is that he's still being bullied.
And they're probably laughing at him behind his back.
So yeah, he's still a loser.
He'll never be "cool."
by Anonymous | reply 47 | January 7, 2025 9:23 PM
|
[quote]Mark Zuckerberg is bending the knee and kissing Trump's ass.
As is Jeff Bezos:
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 48 | January 7, 2025 9:48 PM
|
R26 - sorry, I didn’t delete it, I deactivated it.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | January 7, 2025 9:48 PM
|
I've always nicknamed him Mark SUCKACUNT. Genocides will become a dime-a-dozen just like the one he was indirectly responsible for in Myanmar. What a CUNT.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | January 7, 2025 9:55 PM
|
Factchecking always draws hoots of derision from low-information voters, mainly because it reliably contradicts what they'll most easily and fondly believe. These are the anti-intellectuals who will say, "I have COMMON sense," basically the collective folk wisdom of their neighbors vs. anything academic. They can have Facebook! I have gotten so many bot postings of sad monochrome AI interiors lately, like is Meta buying Rooms 2 Go?
by Anonymous | reply 51 | January 7, 2025 10:32 PM
|
[quote] Factchecking always draws hoots of derision from low-information voters
The accusers don’t matter so much now that the accused, Facebook, has confessed that the accusations are true.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | January 7, 2025 10:40 PM
|
Such a shame. Zuckerberg died in that autoerotic asphyxiation incident in 2023 for nothing.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | January 7, 2025 11:49 PM
|
R31 Legacy media/news is the main source of news for Boomers (TV/Cable News, Newpapers, etc.)
by Anonymous | reply 55 | January 7, 2025 11:52 PM
|
Weird that a former Peter Thiel "protege" wants to get rid of hate speech protections for LGBT people
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 56 | January 8, 2025 12:11 AM
|
[quote][R31] Legacy media/news is the main source of news for Boomers (TV/Cable News, Newpapers, etc.)
Legacy media was pro Harris/Walz this past election.
It was social media that aided Trump/Vance.
Especially the podcasts popular with young men (e.g. Joe Rogan).
by Anonymous | reply 57 | January 8, 2025 12:25 AM
|
brought to down to my closest 60.
This is so sad and one of the reasons we have trump, thanks stupid cunt, go drink bleach
by Anonymous | reply 59 | January 8, 2025 1:31 AM
|
god that sounds like such a campfest r48. In fact, I hope some Drag Queens with way too much time on their hands will put together a parody version for youtube, or somewhere.
A young whore's erotic journey from Minsk to Mar-a-Lago. But who will play Lurch?
by Anonymous | reply 60 | January 8, 2025 3:14 AM
|
From the Greatest Generation to the Chickenshit Generation.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | January 8, 2025 3:40 AM
|
Does anything matter to anyone anymore or are we in complete anarchy and I miss the email.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | January 8, 2025 3:43 AM
|
Fuck facebook. It's stale.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | January 8, 2025 3:59 AM
|
[quote] Facebook is getting rid of fact-checkers
Now WE should get rid of Facebook.
And anything owned by Zuckerberg or Musk or Bezos.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | January 8, 2025 3:56 PM
|
He went from kinda bald to now a flowing wig of someone else’s curly locks. He’s a piece of shit.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | January 8, 2025 7:38 PM
|
"Mark Zuckerberg, whose wig is entirely made up of cadaver pubic hair, has announced that Meta platforms will no longer fact check."
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 66 | January 8, 2025 11:29 PM
|
It’s wild that they now updated their policy to explicitly mention that’s now ok to target homosexuals with hate speech.
“We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.”
by Anonymous | reply 68 | January 9, 2025 1:52 AM
|
Did Fuckerberg take his Chinese wife with him to Mar-a-Lardo?
Asking for a fiend.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | January 9, 2025 4:45 AM
|
[Quote] “We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.”
Is that truly an official statement? Holy shit.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | January 9, 2025 1:27 PM
|
“Political and religious discourse” means FB is fine with bullying and demonizing.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | January 9, 2025 1:27 PM
|
Yes, r70. Here's the screenshot.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 72 | January 9, 2025 1:29 PM
|
So will Facebook allow anti-Semitic speech?
THAT is the tell of whether it is truly allowing all speech or not
by Anonymous | reply 73 | January 9, 2025 1:32 PM
|
Think I’m going to move to mastodon
by Anonymous | reply 74 | January 9, 2025 2:13 PM
|
Who reads Facebook for news? If you're dumb enough to do that, than we have a bigger problem than this wannabe oligarch wagging his tiny dick. It's not only bending the knee, but there is a race by our American Oligarchs to have their platform be THE ONE so they will suck off any dictator's dick to get there.
by Anonymous | reply 76 | January 9, 2025 2:44 PM
|
I hate to break it to you, but people are too busy to care about fact checking and detecting bias. Dubya and Trump proved this.
by Anonymous | reply 77 | January 9, 2025 2:46 PM
|
[quote] Who reads Facebook for news?
That’s a good question. I get zero news from Facebook, other than announcements from organizations that I have connected to and people posting in the local group about local things. When I read about news and fact checking on Facebook, it makes me think I must be having a very different experience from what others experience. I don’t see any national news and no one on my friends list post any.
The posts I see that are not from people and organizations I’ve linked to are primarily about cruises, history, and architecture.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | January 9, 2025 2:59 PM
|
God I wish George Carlin was still alive. He knew how to speak to this. When he said that we are not governed, but owned by the ruling class, he was right on the money. They want obedient workers just smart enough to be productive but not too smart to realize we are getting fucked over. Meanwhile we get distracted with shiny objects. All true!
by Anonymous | reply 79 | January 9, 2025 3:25 PM
|