Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Facebook is getting rid of fact-checkers

Meta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a 'community notes' system similar to X.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a series of major changes to the company's moderation policies and practices, saying that the election felt like a "cultural tipping point."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 79January 9, 2025 3:25 PM

There is no reason to use this product

by Anonymousreply 1January 7, 2025 1:04 PM

There is no reason to order from Amazon or maintain an account on Twitter

by Anonymousreply 2January 7, 2025 1:06 PM

I have an IPhone and I am due for an upgrade. There's no reason for me to continue to use Apple products

by Anonymousreply 3January 7, 2025 1:13 PM

Ugh, what a scum bucket

by Anonymousreply 4January 7, 2025 1:19 PM

It is a cultural tipping point. We have to be done with Zuckerberg and all the others who brought this about.

by Anonymousreply 5January 7, 2025 1:19 PM

There’s this video game called Metal Gear Solid 2. At the end of it you realize you’re being manipulated by an AI created by the American deep state/oligarchy for the purpose of mass control. It explains to you that the plan is to flood networks and media with trivial, irrelevant, junk food style information. This creates a population that can no longer think critically or assess the credibility of information. Then it explains how by monitoring your behavior, their algorithms will know everything about you, and therefore curate your media environment to control your behavior. That only elites have the right to shape how the world is seen and remembered. It talks about how the combination of information control and personal profiling creates total mind control - assuming the AI knows you well enough to accurately predict your reaction to various stimuli. think it was developed in 2001 or 2002. I think about that ending all the time, the evil AI describing not some fictional dystopian future but what is now our present reality.

by Anonymousreply 6January 7, 2025 1:31 PM

What does he mean by "cultural tipping point"?

If you can't beat them, join them?

by Anonymousreply 7January 7, 2025 1:36 PM

What a fish-faced cunt.

by Anonymousreply 8January 7, 2025 1:37 PM

He means stop using his product.

by Anonymousreply 9January 7, 2025 1:41 PM

Meta is a joke. I’ve flagged explicit nudity and actual porn to see what would happen, only to get a response that community standards weren’t violated and to just block the content. So what exactly are the community standards, then? I recently deleted my Threads because I thought - no, I’m done with the rage and doom scrolling. Insta and facebook are next. We’re all being manipulated by billionaire tech bros who really don’t give a shit about humanity.

by Anonymousreply 10January 7, 2025 1:49 PM

I deleted all Meta accounts last year. I missed them a lot less than I thought I would. Only downside is discovering how a couple of friendships I had depended on those platforms to exist. While it wasn't pleasant to find that out, I'm glad I did rather than in a more nasty or costly way.

by Anonymousreply 11January 7, 2025 1:57 PM

[quote]So what exactly are the community standards, then?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12January 7, 2025 2:01 PM

Never forget: FB was a project originally invented by an incel to "rate" women who wouldn't have fucked him.

by Anonymousreply 13January 7, 2025 2:59 PM

“At one point, Zuckerberg and other attendees stood, hand over heart, as the club played a rendition of the national anthem sung by imprisoned defendants who are accused of crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot”

by Anonymousreply 14January 7, 2025 3:10 PM

Lord knows Zuck can't afford to pay fact-checkers.

by Anonymousreply 15January 7, 2025 3:20 PM

So I guess this was a requirement from the incoming administration in order to dismiss the existing case and "avoid" further scrutiny from a revamped FTC?

Capitulating in advance. I expect nothing less from "men" like Zuck.

by Anonymousreply 16January 7, 2025 3:24 PM

They don't need further scrutiny from the FTC. All the FTC has to do is say Meta is in violation of the 30 year consent decree they filed after the Cambridge Analytica scandal and they're shut down.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17January 7, 2025 3:32 PM

Not filed, signed. Sorry.

by Anonymousreply 18January 7, 2025 3:33 PM

Will he save space for trans women of color to still be seen and heard?

by Anonymousreply 19January 7, 2025 4:31 PM

They won’t be using professional fact checkers, having found them to be inherently non-objective. There will still be fact checking by the community.

It’s good to be against authoritarian censorship and to embrace free speech.

by Anonymousreply 20January 7, 2025 4:58 PM

No, he'll save space for Adrain Dittman and numerous right wing bots.

by Anonymousreply 21January 7, 2025 5:05 PM

[quote] It’s good to be against authoritarian censorship and to embrace free speech.

Are you one of those "free speech absolutists", by any chance? Did you pay for a blue check mark on X? Do your free speech principles apply to criticizing or making fun of Elon Musk and his associates? I think I know the answers to all my questions already...

by Anonymousreply 22January 7, 2025 5:08 PM

I’m all for fact checking, but did it make any difference? Deplorables see it as vindication and validation when they are proven wrong.

by Anonymousreply 23January 7, 2025 5:09 PM

These Tech giants are like virtual nation states. They make their own rules now. How long till they get their own military but why do that when they can get the taxpayer to pay for their military without having to give anything.It's politicians that have delivered us to them.

by Anonymousreply 24January 7, 2025 5:15 PM

Except they are showing their fear of Trump, so how exactly are they making their own rules? Trump is upending a lot of precedents that Democrats can ignore if they regain power.

by Anonymousreply 25January 7, 2025 5:22 PM

[quote] I recently deleted my Threads because I thought - no, I’m done with the rage and doom scrolling. Insta and facebook are next.

You can’t delete Threads without deleting your Instagram.

by Anonymousreply 26January 7, 2025 5:25 PM

I had much the same experience, R11.

And just as you say, it wasn’t a pleasant discovery but it was an important one.

There’s a kind of hyperbole that develops in social media that can pass for genuine sentiment — and users take that as reality at their peril. Last week on Facebook a guy told me he “loves” me. He doesn’t love me and he meant no harm. He experienced a brief jolt of fellow feeling at reading something I posted and wanted to let me know. And that was absolutely all.

If I needed a real friend in an emergency this particular guy wouldn’t even recognize my face.

Once you step back from those platforms it’s stunning to see how many “friends” are barely even casual acquaintances!

by Anonymousreply 27January 7, 2025 5:26 PM

R24 How long? Musk and Thiel are already deeply tied to the military industrial complex.

by Anonymousreply 28January 7, 2025 5:45 PM

[quote] What does he mean by "cultural tipping point"?

[quote] If you can't beat them, join them?

This is exactly how I interpreted this statement.

But did Zuckerberg really want to "beat them" in the first place?

Sounds like he was with "them" all along, and Trump's election gave him permission to do it.

Democrats were the only ones standing in the way of regulating social media.

Now that's done.

by Anonymousreply 29January 7, 2025 5:48 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30January 7, 2025 5:48 PM

A lot of people point to Fox News as the sources of all the disinformation, but it's really Facebook. It's the main source of information for many Boomers and GenXers. This is not good.

by Anonymousreply 31January 7, 2025 5:50 PM

Kara Swisher:

(Zuckerberg's) video is appalling to impugn fact checkers like that. He could use all the tools if he actually cared and X is now a toxic waste dump. One thing is true: Fact checking does not work on a platform that cannot be sued and has been built to advantage the liars.

by Anonymousreply 32January 7, 2025 5:56 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33January 7, 2025 5:59 PM

I'm rubbing my forehead after watching that video at R33.

I fucking give up.

I just don't know what to do any more.

There's really nothing we CAN do.

by Anonymousreply 34January 7, 2025 6:07 PM

Mark Zuckerberg is bending the knee and kissing Trump's ass.

Lies will now go unchecked on Facebook and Instagram. Zuckerberg is following the example of Twitter.

"Community checking" simply means that others can say you're not telling the truth rather than Zuckerberg removing the post because it is a lie.

by Anonymousreply 35January 7, 2025 6:15 PM

Zolan Kanno-Youngs reporting on this morning's press rally for The New York Times, January 7, 2025:

[quote]"Trump says Meta's decision to end its fact-checking program is most likely in response to his past threats against the company."

Oy.

by Anonymousreply 36January 7, 2025 6:19 PM

[quote] Except they are showing their fear of Trump, so how exactly are they making their own rules?

What the company is saying appears to indicate that it was a fear of the current administration and that associated culture that pushed them to do the censorship they have engaged in. It looks like now they are shifting to where they would like to be if given a choice, so no longer acting out of fear. It makes sense that a social media platform would much prefer not to censor political views, since it would be crippling one of the important uses of such platforms.

by Anonymousreply 37January 7, 2025 7:33 PM

They prefer not to censor “political views” like eating the dogs, vaccines cause autism, and ivermectin cures Covid. The reason their fact checking seemed political is simple. Reality has a well-known liberal bias.

by Anonymousreply 38January 7, 2025 7:37 PM

“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.”

Preach, gurrrrrrl! Also, got a tampon I can borrow?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 39January 7, 2025 8:01 PM

First they came for the trans...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40January 7, 2025 8:07 PM

Honestly, who cares? If you believe what's on social media without more research on your part, you're an idiot.

This is all because of GOP pressure. It is focused on saying whatever it wants without any checks.

by Anonymousreply 41January 7, 2025 8:10 PM

Say their names

by Anonymousreply 42January 7, 2025 8:11 PM

My facebook page has just become one where I forward funny memes. I don't include any personal information about what I'm doing or where I'm going.

It's rather worthless entertainment

by Anonymousreply 43January 7, 2025 8:16 PM

I’m still unconvinced that this changes much. There are trolls dedicated to attacking Anne Frank who continue to post. It was already bad,

by Anonymousreply 44January 7, 2025 8:40 PM

Facebook works best when you really tailor your Friends list to your close friends and relatives, not to everyone you're ever met.

I took a 400 person list and brought to down to my closest 60. Much better experience that way. These are people who truly care about you and your life and you care about them

by Anonymousreply 45January 7, 2025 8:44 PM

[quote] Honestly, who cares?

[quote] I’m still unconvinced that this changes much

Yeah, just the US Presidential Election.

No big deal.

Look at how well that's working out for us.

by Anonymousreply 46January 7, 2025 9:21 PM

Zuckerberg has always been a DORK.

He is a nerd who wants to be part of the popular crowd.

The only thing he doesn't realize is that he's still being bullied.

And they're probably laughing at him behind his back.

So yeah, he's still a loser.

He'll never be "cool."

by Anonymousreply 47January 7, 2025 9:23 PM

[quote]Mark Zuckerberg is bending the knee and kissing Trump's ass.

As is Jeff Bezos:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 48January 7, 2025 9:48 PM

R26 - sorry, I didn’t delete it, I deactivated it.

by Anonymousreply 49January 7, 2025 9:48 PM

I've always nicknamed him Mark SUCKACUNT. Genocides will become a dime-a-dozen just like the one he was indirectly responsible for in Myanmar. What a CUNT.

by Anonymousreply 50January 7, 2025 9:55 PM

Factchecking always draws hoots of derision from low-information voters, mainly because it reliably contradicts what they'll most easily and fondly believe. These are the anti-intellectuals who will say, "I have COMMON sense," basically the collective folk wisdom of their neighbors vs. anything academic. They can have Facebook! I have gotten so many bot postings of sad monochrome AI interiors lately, like is Meta buying Rooms 2 Go?

by Anonymousreply 51January 7, 2025 10:32 PM

Scum

by Anonymousreply 52January 7, 2025 10:33 PM

[quote] Factchecking always draws hoots of derision from low-information voters

The accusers don’t matter so much now that the accused, Facebook, has confessed that the accusations are true.

by Anonymousreply 53January 7, 2025 10:40 PM

Such a shame. Zuckerberg died in that autoerotic asphyxiation incident in 2023 for nothing.

by Anonymousreply 54January 7, 2025 11:49 PM

R31 Legacy media/news is the main source of news for Boomers (TV/Cable News, Newpapers, etc.)

by Anonymousreply 55January 7, 2025 11:52 PM

Weird that a former Peter Thiel "protege" wants to get rid of hate speech protections for LGBT people

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 56January 8, 2025 12:11 AM

[quote][R31] Legacy media/news is the main source of news for Boomers (TV/Cable News, Newpapers, etc.)

Legacy media was pro Harris/Walz this past election.

It was social media that aided Trump/Vance.

Especially the podcasts popular with young men (e.g. Joe Rogan).

by Anonymousreply 57January 8, 2025 12:25 AM

Both of them?

by Anonymousreply 58January 8, 2025 12:26 AM

brought to down to my closest 60.

This is so sad and one of the reasons we have trump, thanks stupid cunt, go drink bleach

by Anonymousreply 59January 8, 2025 1:31 AM

god that sounds like such a campfest r48. In fact, I hope some Drag Queens with way too much time on their hands will put together a parody version for youtube, or somewhere.

A young whore's erotic journey from Minsk to Mar-a-Lago. But who will play Lurch?

by Anonymousreply 60January 8, 2025 3:14 AM

From the Greatest Generation to the Chickenshit Generation.

by Anonymousreply 61January 8, 2025 3:40 AM

Does anything matter to anyone anymore or are we in complete anarchy and I miss the email.

by Anonymousreply 62January 8, 2025 3:43 AM

Fuck facebook. It's stale.

by Anonymousreply 63January 8, 2025 3:59 AM

[quote] Facebook is getting rid of fact-checkers

Now WE should get rid of Facebook.

And anything owned by Zuckerberg or Musk or Bezos.

by Anonymousreply 64January 8, 2025 3:56 PM

He went from kinda bald to now a flowing wig of someone else’s curly locks. He’s a piece of shit.

by Anonymousreply 65January 8, 2025 7:38 PM

"Mark Zuckerberg, whose wig is entirely made up of cadaver pubic hair, has announced that Meta platforms will no longer fact check."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66January 8, 2025 11:29 PM

Mark Cuckerberg.

by Anonymousreply 67January 9, 2025 12:58 AM

It’s wild that they now updated their policy to explicitly mention that’s now ok to target homosexuals with hate speech.

“We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.”

by Anonymousreply 68January 9, 2025 1:52 AM

Did Fuckerberg take his Chinese wife with him to Mar-a-Lardo?

Asking for a fiend.

by Anonymousreply 69January 9, 2025 4:45 AM

[Quote] “We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.”

Is that truly an official statement? Holy shit.

by Anonymousreply 70January 9, 2025 1:27 PM

“Political and religious discourse” means FB is fine with bullying and demonizing.

by Anonymousreply 71January 9, 2025 1:27 PM

Yes, r70. Here's the screenshot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 72January 9, 2025 1:29 PM

So will Facebook allow anti-Semitic speech?

THAT is the tell of whether it is truly allowing all speech or not

by Anonymousreply 73January 9, 2025 1:32 PM

Think I’m going to move to mastodon

by Anonymousreply 74January 9, 2025 2:13 PM

Fuck that aspie psycho!

by Anonymousreply 75January 9, 2025 2:28 PM

Who reads Facebook for news? If you're dumb enough to do that, than we have a bigger problem than this wannabe oligarch wagging his tiny dick. It's not only bending the knee, but there is a race by our American Oligarchs to have their platform be THE ONE so they will suck off any dictator's dick to get there.

by Anonymousreply 76January 9, 2025 2:44 PM

I hate to break it to you, but people are too busy to care about fact checking and detecting bias. Dubya and Trump proved this.

by Anonymousreply 77January 9, 2025 2:46 PM

[quote] Who reads Facebook for news?

That’s a good question. I get zero news from Facebook, other than announcements from organizations that I have connected to and people posting in the local group about local things. When I read about news and fact checking on Facebook, it makes me think I must be having a very different experience from what others experience. I don’t see any national news and no one on my friends list post any.

The posts I see that are not from people and organizations I’ve linked to are primarily about cruises, history, and architecture.

by Anonymousreply 78January 9, 2025 2:59 PM

God I wish George Carlin was still alive. He knew how to speak to this. When he said that we are not governed, but owned by the ruling class, he was right on the money. They want obedient workers just smart enough to be productive but not too smart to realize we are getting fucked over. Meanwhile we get distracted with shiny objects. All true!

by Anonymousreply 79January 9, 2025 3:25 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!