Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

US House passes defense spending bill with anti-trans provisions

Great job everybody. *bangs head against desk*

The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a defense spending bill that includes a provision denying insurance coverage for gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members.

The National Defense Authorization Act, providing for $884 billion in military spending for fiscal year 2025, passed Wednesday on a vote of 281 to 140, with 124 Democrats and 16 Republicans voting against it.

The controversial provision in the act would prohibit coverage under the TriCare insurance plan of any medical intervention for “gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for anyone under age 18. That would mean an end to care for any military families using TriCare as their health insurance. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a far-right, anti-LGBTQ+ Republican, had backed this section of the bill.

The bill now goes to the Senate, which has a narrow Democratic majority. However, it is still expected to pass there, Breaking Defense reports. President Joe Biden has pledged to veto any anti-trans legislation.

Civil rights groups and Democratic politicians quickly condemned the House's action.

Military servicemembers and their families wake up every day and sacrifice more than most of us will ever understand," said a statement from Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson. "Those families protect our right to live freely and with dignity — they deserve that same right, and the freedom to access the care their children need. Today, politicians in the House betrayed our nation’s promise to those who serve. Not since the ‘Defense of Marriage Act’ passed almost 30 years ago has an anti-LGBTQ+ policy been enshrined into federal law. For the thousands of families impacted, this isn’t about politics. It’s about young people who deserve our support. Those who have courageously stepped up to serve this country should never have their families used as bargaining chips. Now, the Senate has the opportunity to reject this and any bill that includes these dangerous anti-trans, anti-military family provisions, and remember the fundamental promise of our democracy: that everyone deserves dignity, respect, and the right to healthcare.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10December 12, 2024 3:21 AM

I've got the F&F button ready, obsessives.

by Anonymousreply 1December 12, 2024 2:32 AM

Gay men and women will be booted from the military next. Because straight dudes look like real soldiers, dont ya know.

Apparently Project 2025 has provisions in place for drafting high-school age kids from public schools into the military (private school kids will be, of course, exempt.)

Make the Army straight again!

by Anonymousreply 2December 12, 2024 2:33 AM

OP, is the prohibition limited to coverage for persons under 18, or for all insureds?

by Anonymousreply 3December 12, 2024 2:40 AM

R3: sounds like just treatment for people under 18. Sounds like it'll also get vetoed then dropped back in next year.

by Anonymousreply 4December 12, 2024 2:44 AM

[quote]drafting high-school age kids from public schools into the military

Matriarchal wrath will kill that idea dead quick quick.

by Anonymousreply 5December 12, 2024 2:46 AM

"Don't ask, don't tell" for the military will be resurrected again shortly.

by Anonymousreply 6December 12, 2024 3:05 AM

What’s an example of gender-affirming care that might result in sterilization? Castration?

by Anonymousreply 7December 12, 2024 3:09 AM

Probably, r7, but we're not experts, are we? I have no opinion on this except to leave it to the experts because I know it's not informed.

by Anonymousreply 8December 12, 2024 3:14 AM

There is a backlash to gender affirming care for minors under 18. I assume this would refer to any surgery that led to sterilization or castration. Would hormone treatment also be included?

by Anonymousreply 9December 12, 2024 3:16 AM

[quote]a provision denying insurance coverage for gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members.

A disaster of epic proportion

by Anonymousreply 10December 12, 2024 3:21 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!