Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Dateline 1988: "DNA evidence helps identify Tacoma woman’s killer 36 years after her death"

Tracy Whitney was last seen leaving a Burger King after an argument with her ex-boyfriend in August 1988. Less than 24 hours later, fishermen found her body in a river near Sumner, Washington, about 12 miles east of Tacoma. She was 18 years old.

An autopsy revealed Tracy had been sexually assaulted and died of strangulation, according to a statement from the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office. Her death was ruled a homicide.

Detectives collected DNA samples from her body that presumably belonged to the killer, interviewed people of interest and administered polygraph tests. No suspect was identified, and the case grew cold. Tracy’s sister, Robin Whitney, was 11 years old when the murder took place. Following the loss of her “protector,” Robin vowed to avoid talking about Tracy – not to her friends, her father or eventually to her daughters. “I didn’t want to think about what had happened to her, and what her last moments were like and how scared she must’ve been,” Robin told CNN. “I’d also have to think about everything we missed out on as sisters, how unfair that was.”

She believed the case would likely never be solved, and thinking of all the “what ifs” only brought fresh waves of grief and frustration. But roughly 10 years ago, Robin’s father, who had avoided speaking of Tracy for decades, told her the police had recovered a DNA sample from the crime scene in 1988. The news gave Robin hope. And she slowly began sharing stories of her sister with her daughters. Robin also learned her father had visited the sheriff’s office several times since the murder, hoping to revive the investigation.

In 2005, the sheriff’s office renewed efforts to solve the crime by uploading the DNA sample to the FBI’s national genetic database, CODIS. They decided to resubmit Tracy’s DNA swabs after new technology became available, the sheriff’s office said, but the effort yielded no results. The first breakthrough came in 2022, after the sheriff’s office received a grant from the state attorney general’s office. With this funding, they sent the DNA sample to Parabons NanoLab in Virginia for genetic genealogy testing.

Thirty-six years after Tracy’s death, the sheriff’s office used lab data to identify John Guillot Jr. as her killer.

Sheriffs, however, could not make an arrest. Guillot Jr. died eight months before authorities could connect him to the killing, Pierce County Det. Sgt. Lindsay Kirkegaard said in a video released Sunday. Genetic genealogy, a combination of DNA analysis and family tree research, finally led detectives to Guillot Jr. A relatively new field of study, genetic genealogy gained prominence as hobbyists began looking into their family history. It has since expanded into a forensic method used by law enforcement to crack cold cases.

(con't inside)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4December 8, 2024 9:35 PM

In 2018, it led to the arrest of the Golden State Killer, and it has recently helped solve several other cold cases, including a 1974 murder in Wisconsin and a 1988 murder in Pennsylvania. Parabon NanoLabs tested the DNA sample and traced the suspect’s family lines to the 1700s. The results pointed to Guillot Jr. as the main suspect, according to the sheriff’s office. To confirm Guillot Jr. was the killer, detectives had to compare his DNA to the sample they had collected from the crime scene in 1988. That wasn’t possible because Guillot Jr.’s remains had been cremated. However, the genealogy lab findings led investigators to Guillot Jr.’s biological son, John Guillot III.

The son had also recently died, but the medical examiner’s office had his DNA on file. After further genetic testing, detectives confirmed his father was a match for the suspect’s genetic profile, according to the sheriff’s office. Detectives believe Guillot Jr. and Tracy did not know each other prior to the killing. Since Guillot died before he was identified as the perpetrator, his profile could not be uploaded to CODIS to see if he was responsible for any other crimes.

Robin had been waiting “almost (her) entire life” to learn the killer’s identity. But the discovery surprised Robin in other ways. “The overwhelming support that we’ve gotten from the community that we grew up in, and the general public interest and attention that she’s getting feels like justice in a way,” she said. “People are talking about her, and they remember her, and they miss her.”

“On the other hand,” Robin added, “he didn’t face the criminal process, so he got away with it.”

by Anonymousreply 1December 8, 2024 8:51 PM

Ugly kid

by Anonymousreply 2December 8, 2024 9:12 PM

Ancestry DNA tests are $39 and they're pushing them heavy in commercials. I expected more cold cases will be solved using genetic genealogy in the near future. Get ready for your grandpappies to go down folks.

by Anonymousreply 3December 8, 2024 9:25 PM

I don't know how I feel about this. It sort of violates the rights of family members through whom the perps are tracked.

It seems like you ought to be able to "opt out" of having your DNA used like this. Also, who is responsible if something else is revealed, like an unknown child that had been the result of rape had been given up for adoption, or other privacy related issue. What if the testing reveals an affair child and your spouse divorces you.

I'm glad crimes are being solved through science. I'm glad families and friends are finally getting closure. But, as with many, many debates on DL, do their rights supersede the rights of other people? Does submitting to one of those ancestry DNA services a priori negate your personal privacy on the matter?

Could a health insurance company deny coverage because family members have DNA markers for diseases even if you've never been tested?

The positives outweight the negatives...for now. But, the laws and protections are nowhere near close to catching up to what science can do.

by Anonymousreply 4December 8, 2024 9:35 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!