Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Katie Couric was frustrated by Kamala Harris' inability to succinctly answer questions

Katie Couric took a swipe at Vice President Kamala Harris for her non-answers in various interviews leading up to the presidential election.

On Thursday's installment of her podcast "Next Question with Katie Couric," the veteran broadcaster had a lengthy post-election conversation with MSNBC host and longtime Democratic spokeswoman Jen Psaki, who said she thought one of Harris' "better interviews" was her Fox News sit-down with Bret Baier.

"I always find that people do better when they're asked really challenging, pointed questions. I always felt that way about Hillary Clinton," Couric said. "If you are giving them these almost weird, like, amorphous softballs, it's really hard to kind of hone your message and be succinct and say what you really need to say."

"I also felt that, and again, I think [Harris] really did well in so many areas, but I was frustrated by her inability to really succinctly answer questions at times, Jen," Couric continued.

"Like, if she was asked about changing the Supreme Court at that CNN town hall, she had an opportunity to talk about ethics and what, you know, [Supreme Court Justices Samuel] Alito and Clarence Thomas were doing, and she answered, like, in one sentence, and then went on to something that had nothing to do with the question," Couric said. "You know, people notice that, and it's like, ‘Answer the g-dd--n question, please!’"

She then pivoted to Harris' now-infamous comments on "The View" where she was asked about what she would do differently from President Biden, calling it "one of the most damaging things."

"Ok, Jen, you're an insider. Why didn't Joe Biden say, 'Listen, I know you're going to have to separate yourself from this administration. Let's talk about areas where you can, where they're legitimate, and God speed,'" Couric wondered. "Because it- I think somebody wrote that it was almost as if they were more afraid of hurting Joe Biden's feelings than winning the election."

Psaki, who served as Biden's White House press secretary before joining MSNBC, responded by saying it was a "unique and painful summer" for Biden and that there "was a fragility" about him being sidelined by the Democratic Party. She also pointed out that Biden was "beloved" by the party when he stepped aside and that Harris had "navigated the politics of that in a very tricky way."

"It seems to me, if I were running for president, Jen, I would sit down with my brain trust, and I'd be like, 'Okay, let's play out these questions. What am I gonna say?'" Couric said.

"And I would have had a template that I would have carried around with me in every interview, and I would have reviewed them and said, you know, 'This is what I believe, and this is how I'm going to handle a question like that.' Now, why didn't they- it just didn't seem like that was done. Am I crazy?" she wondered.

Couric also knocked the vice president for going several weeks without doing any interviews when she first emerged as the Democratic nominee, saying it was "making me crazy as a consumer."

"What was that?" the former "Today" host asked.

"I don't know," Psaki responded before speculating that the Harris campaign was prepping for the debate.

"She should've been everywhere," Couric later added.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76November 23, 2024 1:40 PM

Cunty Couric’s attention grab here is another example of major news outlet journalists failing to ask the right questions to the right people.

by Anonymousreply 1November 19, 2024 4:14 PM

Because Trump bloviates and rants for so long, less questions are actually asked of him during any interview. I started to realize this in 2016. He steers the interview because he is over the top and offensive. It is actually lowkey brilliant, political currency wise. That is why you don’t prop up a demagogue.

by Anonymousreply 2November 19, 2024 4:23 PM

Oprah noticed in too during that town hall meeting. Because she actually stated it at one point. Like she honed Harris’ answer and literally stated “to bring it back to the question asked”. I love Kamala. I am not going to bash her. Because elections can be stressful and she was held to a way higher standard than Dump.

by Anonymousreply 3November 19, 2024 4:25 PM

Women hate women

by Anonymousreply 4November 19, 2024 4:32 PM

Yes, R4, Couric failed to recognize the fact that Kamala's mouth is on a female body.

by Anonymousreply 5November 19, 2024 4:34 PM

To me Katie’s assessment was fair and she didn’t bash her. Elections are sum zero games. We wouldn’t be having this discussion had she actually won.

by Anonymousreply 6November 19, 2024 4:37 PM

Does Katie Couric just interview herself now on these cable-for-dead people shows

by Anonymousreply 7November 19, 2024 4:38 PM

Why didn't she volunteer to media train and coach Harris?

by Anonymousreply 8November 19, 2024 4:41 PM

^R8, I can’t tell if you are trolling.

Should our media figures step in and train candidates that are unprepared or awkward in interviews?

Her campaign team should’ve been on this. If they weren’t, it’s on them. If they were, then it’s on Harris.

Regardless, Harris was not the right candidate for this election. Democrats needs to be ready with candidates who are sharp speakers ready with specific responses to challenging questions. They don’t need to please everyone; they need to sound capable, commanding, and ready for any challenge that the highest office in the nation may have.

“What about Trump?” doesn’t solve the problem if the objective is to defeat him.

by Anonymousreply 9November 19, 2024 4:53 PM

R9 He or she is definitely trolling.

by Anonymousreply 10November 19, 2024 4:57 PM

I’ve said on here before that Trump’s New York accent makes him seem more intelligent than he is and you bitches chewed me out for it.

by Anonymousreply 11November 19, 2024 4:58 PM

Captain obvious

by Anonymousreply 12November 19, 2024 5:09 PM

I doubt giving Katie Porter type answers would have changed many votes.

People did not like the Biden administration and Harris was a face of the administration. They did not want it to continue because they felt it had failed.

The ONLY way Harris would have been elected is if Biden had resigned, given Harris the power of the Presidency and allowed her to correct course. Because the party is so deeply broken that it had to walk on eggshells around a deeply cynical and egotistic geriatric (sound familiar), nothing beyond that would have gotten her elected. People hate Biden. HATE him.

by Anonymousreply 13November 19, 2024 5:16 PM

[quote]Regardless, Harris was not the right candidate for this election.

Who was the right candidate, oh wise knower of all things political and the American electorate? 🙄

by Anonymousreply 14November 19, 2024 5:21 PM

I actually think Biden resigning would have helped her because President Kamala Harris would have been huge news around the globe trumping, pun intended, all the Trump noise of “stunts”. You had cunts googling the day before the election “Did Biden drop out of the race”; that shows you just how uninformed the American electorate is. I’m sure it’s only around 10% but that’s a lot.

by Anonymousreply 15November 19, 2024 6:08 PM

R14: This has been hashed over a thousand times on DL. She lost. She lost the popular vote and every single swing state. She was the wrong candidate to run against Trump.

But some obvious plus points in response to your question:

1/ someone who ran in and won a primary. 2/ a man - a woman already lost to him and now it’s 0 for 2. 3/ someone not closely associated with Biden and the coverup of his failing mental state. 4/ someone who can speak clearly, directly, and effectively.

Democrats fucked this up. Mid-terms are less than two years away. They can course correct or operate as usual. Meanwhile, Republicans now hold the Presidency, the House, the Senate, and for all practical purposes, the Supreme Court.

Why do I have the sense that r14 was also one of the Mighty Joe cheerleaders after the debate that exposed his addled, tragic state?

If you bristle at criticism following a loss this major, you need to accept that you are part of the problem that landed us here.

by Anonymousreply 16November 19, 2024 8:49 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17November 19, 2024 8:52 PM

This is BULLSHIT. Harris answered questions 300% better than Trump. 500% better. Trump sharted out gibberish for a year and all summer and fall the sharts were notoriously wet, stinky, substance-less lies and pure crap.

by Anonymousreply 18November 19, 2024 8:58 PM

Kamala Harris was a disaster.

Funny, the one question she was able to answer clearly and succinctly was this one asked of her on The View:

Question: "If anything, would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?

Answer: ""there is not a thing that comes to mind."

That's how stupid the woman is.

by Anonymousreply 19November 19, 2024 9:13 PM

Doesn’t Katie have hamburger and fries to deliver?

by Anonymousreply 20November 19, 2024 9:19 PM

Kamala was not a disaster. More bullshit.

The disaster were all the powers that brainwashed dumbasses to value and vote for Trump.

by Anonymousreply 21November 19, 2024 9:37 PM

[quote]Kamala was not a disaster.

Her campaign blew through well over a billion dollars (and is in debt.)

She lost all 7 swing states.

She lost the popular vote.

Lost the Senate. Lost the House.

Ya know what all that's called? A disaster.

by Anonymousreply 22November 19, 2024 9:41 PM

I don't blame Harris for losing. Did she make some mistakes? Absolutely. But she was given an amount of time that none of her counterparts were ever again.

Joe Biden and his team are largely to blame, for their selfishness and callous disregard for the people of this country. And Biden did not help matters campaigning for her. All he did was set her back further. And some think it was intentional.

by Anonymousreply 23November 19, 2024 10:02 PM

Kamala ran a flawless campaign . Rinse/repeat ad nauseam.

by Anonymousreply 24November 19, 2024 10:04 PM

R22 I won’t let you bash her. She was not a disaster. I mean you are right technically but she was against this huge misinformation machine and the fact that the media has turned Trump into a super celebrity. Trump also has brilliant campaign slogans. Make America Great. Trump will fix it. Easy to remember with great color schemes almost like a brand.

by Anonymousreply 25November 19, 2024 10:06 PM

Super battery electrocution or sharks. They are eating the cats. "The weave". Yeah that was better campaigning than Harris.

by Anonymousreply 26November 19, 2024 10:09 PM

I LIKE WAR HEROES WHO DON'T GET CAPTURED. BLOOD CUMMIN FROM HER WHEREVER. I DON'T NEED YOUR VOTE. IN SPRINGFEEL, THEY EATIN DAWGS. I HAVE A CONCEPT OF A PLAN.

by Anonymousreply 27November 19, 2024 10:13 PM

It is a media creation. It's protected by the media and they want it back in the white house.

Normal women find harassment abusive.

Media professionals are burnt out streetwalkers desperate for ANYONE to grab them by their well worn, SOILED pushy.

by Anonymousreply 28November 19, 2024 10:22 PM

[quote]People did not like the Biden administration

I did. But then again, I actually know what he accomplished, and know how hard he had to work to get it done.

Besides, nobody's perfect.

by Anonymousreply 29November 19, 2024 10:34 PM

All in all we underestimated Trump’s popularity since the pandemic. I didn’t though. We should have seen the margins of 2020 to understand that Trump’s support wasn’t waning and Biden’s win was mostly due the global pandemic. When the fuck has Joe fucking Biden ever been popular amongst the left. But once again liberals know every fucking thing in the world except how to win.

by Anonymousreply 30November 19, 2024 11:41 PM

[quote] This is BULLSHIT. Harris answered questions 300% better than Trump. 500% better. Trump sharted out gibberish for a year and all summer and fall the sharts were notoriously wet, stinky, substance-less lies and pure crap.

Exactly.

We really are living in a Bizarro Universe, where Kamala is criticized for every single thing she does, and psychotic treasonous bigot Trump is given a pass for everything.

Don't worry, though.

American media will get what's coming to them.

They think appeasement is the answer to gaining Trump's favor.

They're in for a very rude awakening.

by Anonymousreply 31November 20, 2024 2:10 AM

That she could answer questions any percent better than Trump is moot. That she is eminently more qualified is moot. She is a Black she. That's why she lost. America is deeply racist and deeply misogynist. Men hate women (they're gleefully bragging they made women cry when Trump won!) and women really, really hate women, particularly smart, well spoken, intelligent and accomplished women. And white men hate Black men, so much that they'll let their worst delegitimize their best. We all forgot this, and we shouldn't have; running women gave us Trump. Men have spoken: the worst of them is still better than the best of women. And just enough women agree with them that no woman will be elected president in our lifetimes.

by Anonymousreply 32November 20, 2024 2:49 AM

Katie Couric has been around for forty years and she's never learned to ask a good question.

by Anonymousreply 33November 20, 2024 4:55 AM

Katie courier has been retired for several years after writing a book where she burned all of her bridges.

by Anonymousreply 34November 20, 2024 12:25 PM

[quote]We really are living in a Bizarro Universe, where Kamala is criticized for every single thing she does, and psychotic treasonous bigot Trump is given a pass for everything.

That's not a Bizarro Universe -- that's par for the course when you're a woman.

For example, this has happened to me and my female friends a myriad of times. You're at a staff meeting. You have a good idea, and tell the group about it. They dismiss what you have to say as unimportant, unworkable, whatever. Then, a few minutes later, a man in the group says the exact same thing with a slightly different wording, and the group pronounces him and his idea as brilliant and decides to implement the idea immediately.

You guys don't get (and never will) how hard it is to be a woman in this society. You get things handed to you that women never get, and one of those things is respect.

And that explains the disrespect for Kamala Harris.

by Anonymousreply 35November 20, 2024 12:44 PM

[quote]Although I'll never forgive him for C. Thomas

Wait, what did Joe do to C. Thomas Howell?

by Anonymousreply 36November 20, 2024 12:50 PM

[quote]she was held to a way higher standard than Dump.

r3 That isn't exactly a high bar in the first place.

by Anonymousreply 37November 20, 2024 12:59 PM

How was Kamala criticized for anything. You haven't been able to say aht about her since she became the nominee. If you did you'd be jumped al over and accused of being a racist woman hater.

She didn't lose because she's an Indian and Jamaican woman. She lost because being the VP of the most disliked POTUS in history and being an Indian and Jamaican woman was all that she had going for her

by Anonymousreply 38November 20, 2024 1:27 PM

[quote]the most disliked POTUS in history

Um, really? I seem to recall a president who was so disliked that this country went to war against him and the northern half of the country. And he was shot and killed.

Just sayin'.

by Anonymousreply 39November 20, 2024 1:31 PM

I felt through out the campaign Harris' continued weak spot - and that of her team - was her ability to answer questions effectively. The View question was political malpractice.

It wasn't fatal in my view because I don't think any Democrat could have won this election - but it wasn't acceptable at the national level. It just wasn't. And it wasn't unsolvable either.

by Anonymousreply 40November 20, 2024 1:39 PM

So many of the excuses here capture the dynamic of this campaign that often gets overlooked: Kamala Harris wasn't running against Donald Trump alone... she was running against Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.

Her campaign did a decent job but not a great one on the messaging (with the occasional disaster.) But it wasn't bad enough she should have lost the election over it or lost it to Trump. This was a referendum on a Democrat administration and angry voters kicked them to the curb.

by Anonymousreply 41November 20, 2024 1:43 PM

The only upside of this disaster is the end of corporate media.

Perky, below average looking assholes with huge gums paid millions to read lies from a teleprompter?

sayonara, cunts.

Perky is a euphemism for fake friendly.

by Anonymousreply 42November 20, 2024 1:44 PM

“like…like…like”

by Anonymousreply 43November 20, 2024 1:56 PM

And I'm frustrated that Ms. Couric's noise is still being recorded and disseminated.

by Anonymousreply 44November 20, 2024 2:04 PM

[quote] The View question was political malpractice.

People are giving this interview on "The View," WAAAAAAAY too much power.

How many people actually watch that shitty show?

How many people actually saw this stupid interview?

I certainly didn't And it had no effect on my vote for Kamala.

So give me a fucking break about this stupid interview.

by Anonymousreply 45November 20, 2024 2:33 PM

[quote]How many people actually watch that shitty show? How many people actually saw this stupid interview?

I don't watch the show, I didn't see the interview, but I heard about it over and over and over.

by Anonymousreply 46November 20, 2024 2:41 PM

I wouldn’t put much stock in Katie Couric’s assessment of the communication skills of Kamala Harris. Katie’s not too articulate herself.

Listen, Kamala’s candidacy was doomed at least four years ago, when Joe Biden said his principal criterion for a VP running mate was that she be a Black woman. In other words, most of the electorate understood that he was by definition making a DEI hire - regardless of whether or not Kamala was qualified to be VP and whether or not she was the best pick.

I know he felt boxed into making that promise since his candidacy was on life support until Rep. Jim Clyburn and then Boack women of South Carolina stepped in to give Joe CPR and revive his political life.

In the intervening years, as much of the country turned against the entire DEI movement (and the GOP did a masterful job of weaponizing DEI against her and Dems in general), Kamala would never be able to outrun the perception that that was the only reason she ended up in the White House.

I’ve never been a huge fan of hers, but I certainly think she was qualified to be president and might have done a good job.

But if you have a memory longer than that of a mosquito, you’ll recall that her own initial run for the presidency flamed out without her winning even one primary. She proved beyond the shadow of a doubt four years ago her utter lack of popularity with the general electorate. And nothing she did as VP served to change that.

Still, I’d hoped against hope that she could pull this off. That initial explosion of enthusiasm when Joe dropped out made me think she could win.

But the mixture of ignorance, self-interest, misogyny, and racism that drove voters to choose Trump or sit out the election proved insurmountable.

by Anonymousreply 47November 20, 2024 3:20 PM

Mamala should have just made up a pack of lies like Turd did. Once you're in, you're in. And by 2028 he'd no longer be a threat.

by Anonymousreply 48November 20, 2024 4:02 PM

[QUOTE]Joe Biden said his principal criterion for a VP running mate was that she be a Black woman.

I don't suppose you could link a source for this assertion?

by Anonymousreply 49November 20, 2024 7:51 PM

R39 I don’t think we can compare presidencies and approval ratings pre Industrial revolution to those starting from 1920s and so on with the advent of pop culture. I mean back then, 3/4th of society couldn’t even vote. It is fact that, Biden is the most disliked president of modern history. Hopefully Dump takes that title from him. And don’t you ever compare Sleepy Joe to Abraham Lincoln again. Don’t do it cunt.

by Anonymousreply 50November 20, 2024 8:22 PM

Republicans aren't going to stop lying about Dem politicians. They've successfully pushed the whole country far to the right and stolen literally trillions of dollars by targeting individual Dems with character assassination (and accusing Dems of character assassinating them, which is hilarious given the number of crimes they have been guilty of). As long as people are too stupid to vote for good government instead of no government for them and torture for others, then things will not improve. EXCEPT if we find a way to eliminate the billionaire class. Then retaking society will not be so difficult, since it all runs on money. Lots and lots of money.

by Anonymousreply 51November 21, 2024 3:37 PM

It seems Joe only had 2 good years of total control of his faculties so I think he did awfully well, all 4 years considered. I don't get the dislike for Joe Biden. He's only about 60% Irish but he sure does remind me of a lot of my Irish uncles of Biden't generation. They are (or were, many are dead now) a mixed bag of charm and blowhard glad-handing, and some messiness always, but there was heart and some decency.

by Anonymousreply 52November 22, 2024 12:25 AM

[quote]America is deeply racist and deeply misogynist.

So let's choose a black woman for our candidate!

by Anonymousreply 53November 22, 2024 12:34 AM

Sometimes I wonder if Kamala was chosen because the Democrats knew they'd lose this election and they knew they could fall back on the "racism and sexism" accusations very easily as opposed to taking real accountability for any blind spots in the party as a whole. It's genius, if you think about it.

by Anonymousreply 54November 22, 2024 12:37 AM

Katie Couric is too stupid to be allowed to live.

by Anonymousreply 55November 22, 2024 12:46 AM

Katie Couric can go fuck herself and leave our Kamala the hell alone.

by Anonymousreply 56November 22, 2024 1:33 AM

You guys are such Nazis. Anyone who falls “out of line” is Maga.

Kamala sucked and lost. Being in denial of that makes you just a nutty as a Trumper.

by Anonymousreply 57November 22, 2024 2:34 AM

It comes down to the fact that regardless of what feelingless douches that Republican politicians can be in the way they act or talk, when they do they do it assertively, fearlessly, strongly and straight to their point. This results in their asshole comments gaining more attention and weight than when the Democratic pols deliver their touchy-feely, handwringing thoughts with their emotions, squeaky voices and politically correct virtue-signaling.

by Anonymousreply 58November 22, 2024 3:21 AM

Katie gets frustrated when she has to pump her own gas, I wouldn't be too concerned.

by Anonymousreply 59November 22, 2024 3:38 AM

R58 Yes. Trump speaks at a fourth grade level.

Whatever he has to say is simple and short enough to make a headline which is the extent of what most people read.

by Anonymousreply 60November 22, 2024 5:32 AM

Listening to smart people make dumb people feel bad about being dumb. Trump is at their level. They’re very angry about smart people making them feel dumb their whole lives.

by Anonymousreply 61November 22, 2024 6:06 AM

Cunt Curic knew what was a stake and she could have helped Dems win-with all her money she must be MAGA Eat shit Katie and I’m glad you don’t get to host Macys Parade anymore!

by Anonymousreply 62November 22, 2024 6:19 AM

[quote]Listening to smart people make dumb people feel bad about being dumb. Trump is at their level. They’re very angry about smart people making them feel dumb their whole lives.

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.

by Anonymousreply 63November 22, 2024 12:10 PM

The reason you don't get the hate for Joe Biden is you haven't heard it day in and day out every hour of every day on right wing media. That's really the level of character assassination that was going on.

by Anonymousreply 64November 22, 2024 2:22 PM

R64, I’m thinking about your comment. I’ve always known I live in a very blue bubble - my neighborhood, my friends/family, my interests, my media consumption.

I only get exposed to the kind of media you’re talking about when I travel and spend time in some random bar or donut shop with tvs tuned to Fox News. So, rarely.

But what I really find hard to understand is this: Why the intense hatred for Joe Biden among the working class? Hasn’t he been a better president for the working class than most recent presidents? Didn’t he stabilize a faltering economy? Wasn’t he the only president (possibly ever) to stand with strikers on the picket line? Why do they hate him so much? I mean, I’ve driven past lawns with Fuck Biden signs. I’ve never seen that for any other leader here. I really don’t get it. It seems pathological to me.

by Anonymousreply 65November 22, 2024 4:30 PM

I don’t think many people really hate Biden. They were angry about inflation and many think he has dementia. The hatred for the Clintons and Obama was much more intense than anything Biden is getting.

by Anonymousreply 66November 22, 2024 4:37 PM

[quote]I don’t think many people really hate Biden.

Oh, yes they do, R66.

I'm trying to write about what I heard the Ocala, FL locals saying about Biden in the Social Security office yesterday, but I can't make myself. I feel the rising gorge as soon as I start to type those words.

Suffice it to say, we at the "front lines" of the red cataclysm hear this shit all the time.

Just take our word for it and be grateful you don't have to.

by Anonymousreply 67November 22, 2024 7:47 PM

R57 She did not suck. She played the best hand she was dealt. You suck you dumb bitch.

by Anonymousreply 68November 22, 2024 11:03 PM

R64 has it right: brainwashing by Fox “News” and other Republican propaganda spreaders was successful in making overwhelmingly vast numbers of citizens/voters believe that what is true is false and what is a lie is reality. The end goal for perpetrating this grand scheme has always been been to reduce (to nothing, if they could get away with it) taxes on the wealthy and on businesses and to cut tax rates and regulations on corporations - basically, creating the conditions where the rich can get richer beyond all measures of fairness while the rest of us are left with all of the burden of keeping our society, government, and economy running. Those at the top who are pulling the levers have honed their successful strategy over many decades. Fox is merely one node, if the biggest and most valuable one, in their network of reliable sycophants, conspirators, and shit spreaders in and out of the media who peddle the snake oil to the naive and ignorant masses. If there’s one thing that the perpetrators of the scheme know all too well it’s that creating advantages for themselves by leveraging religion and controversial social issues is the most effective tool they have, and they use it expertly, like the evil genius they aspire to be.

by Anonymousreply 69November 22, 2024 11:47 PM

[quote] has it right: brainwashing by Fox “News” and other Republican propaganda spreaders was successful in making overwhelmingly vast numbers of citizens/voters believe that what is true is false and what is a lie is reality.

You're wrong about that.

People compared their life during the last 4 years with their lives during the previous 4 years and they voted accordingly. They didn't need FoxNews or MSNBC to convince them otherwise.

by Anonymousreply 70November 23, 2024 12:21 AM

Not ture R70. Four years ago we were in the middle of a pandemic and NOBODY's life was better.

by Anonymousreply 71November 23, 2024 3:04 AM

Ladies and gentlemen, meet a genuine Faux Nooz-influenced member of said naive and ignorant masses: R70.

Take a bow, R70.

by Anonymousreply 72November 23, 2024 3:18 AM

R70, R71 You guys are delusional.

It's the economy stupid.

People compared their life during the last 4 years with their lives during the previous 4 years and they voted accordingly.

by Anonymousreply 73November 23, 2024 3:30 AM

Lies R71. Nobody is worse off than in 2020.

by Anonymousreply 74November 23, 2024 7:49 AM

People never liked Biden. He was voted in to get Trump out. He was failing primaries until black SC voted. Once Dems knew Biden could secure the black vote unlike the others, they pushed him. Black people chose him based on his name and link to Obama.

Via wiki

Joe Biden's overwhelming victory, his first-ever primary win in his three presidential runs, gave his campaign new momentum going into Super Tuesday after lackluster performances in Iowa and New Hampshire and a distant second-place finish in Nevada. The Biden campaign claimed that the outcome proved he had the most diverse coalition of any Democratic candidate, as Iowa's and New Hampshire's Democratic electorates are over 90% white, while South Carolina's Democratic electorate is nearly 60% black.

He was never actually liked, he was used to get Trump out of office.

by Anonymousreply 75November 23, 2024 8:19 AM

[quote]It's the economy stupid. People compared their life during the last 4 years with their lives during the previous 4 years and they voted accordingly.

Amazingly, many of those people say the economy and their lives have completely turned around in the last two weeks.

It's almost as if wasn't really the economy, stupid.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76November 23, 2024 1:40 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!