When did that start?
Does DL not allow WaPo links?
by Anonymous | reply 12 | November 8, 2024 5:03 PM |
I unsubscribed so I frankly don't care
by Anonymous | reply 1 | November 8, 2024 4:00 PM |
It's been a minute. My assumption is that there was some cease and desist involved, but who knows?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | November 8, 2024 4:01 PM |
Why would the WAPO not want links to it’s content?
by Anonymous | reply 3 | November 8, 2024 4:04 PM |
Or is it DL blocking it?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | November 8, 2024 4:34 PM |
WaPo has been cancelled. Find a different source.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | November 8, 2024 4:36 PM |
Is the LA Times cancelled too?
There's no rhyme or reason to DL's prejudices.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | November 8, 2024 4:45 PM |
The block predates Bezos’s cancellation of the endorsement.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | November 8, 2024 4:46 PM |
I don't know the truth and this is [bold]pure speculation[/bold], but there may be something about paywalls or lawsuit threats that keeps Muriel from doing what she did to Independent and Daily Mail links. They may not be able to disclose that they got a cease and desist.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | November 8, 2024 4:47 PM |
Or worse.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | November 8, 2024 4:47 PM |
[quote] Is the LA Times cancelled too? There's no rhyme or reason to DL's prejudices.
There’s a reason: billionaire class breaking journalism norms to preemptively kiss Trumps ass due to their other business interests. It’s not that complicated.
Principaled decisions, though, really are useless now. Nothing really matters anymore.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | November 8, 2024 4:48 PM |
R2. Well, this is from my attorney...a "seest" and "assist"!
by Anonymous | reply 11 | November 8, 2024 4:48 PM |
WaPo is twoast
by Anonymous | reply 12 | November 8, 2024 5:03 PM |