Bisexuals of Datalounge

Depends on how weighed down by family expectations OP. Most seem to cave into heterosexual relationships irrespective of true feelings.

Depends on who has the most money.

Interesting thread, OP.

I'm curious too.

[quote]Bi man that prefers men 75.0%

This one winning is surprising considering how despised this cohort is on DL.

When it comes to just fucking, I honestly prefer women. Then I have this one friend, my bro, who I love cuddling and making out with. I don’t know how unusual this is.

I would only try vag once in a rare while but only in the form of a bi MMF 3 way. Never alone on my own. I still see myself as gay and romantically and sexually attracted to men full time. Never could fall in love or end up with a woman.

Beware of trolls ...

Bite me.

I'm a 4 on the Kinsey scale. Gold star lesbian.

R9 If you are 4 then you are not a lesbian. That would make you bi with preference for the same sex. If you said 5, okay. Even if that isn't fully gay. 6 is gay.

I have interviewed a lot of bi men over the decades. 100s

Most of these bi men seemed to be less confused as to who they liked for see,than they were sex addicts. With other men, at the time I interviewed them, it had in general almost nothing to do with sexual attraction or romance it had to do with excitment, release, sex, addiction.

Glory holes, truck parks, baths, public parks, and friends with privileges it all added up to lots of sex. Most “seemed” to enjoy the sex more than the fact that they were having sex with another man,

The original MSM

A general observation not a 100% thing

r9 Ma'am...

It's a 1-5 scale r10. You're splitting hairs. Four is definitely in the homosexual zone.

Just because you're a homosexual "6" (ha!) doesn't mean I'm not. I'm attracted to very few men in comparison to women.

I'm Bi Ling.

Also r12 that's some 21st century expanded bullshit Kinsey Scale.

The scale has always been 0-6. 1-5 is for the various levels of bisexuality.

[quote[The Kinsey scale ranges from 0 for those interviewed who solely had desires for or sexual experiences with the opposite sex, to 6 for those who had exclusively same sex desires or experiences, and [bold]1–5 for those who had varying levels of desire or experiences with both sexes,[/bold]

If you're attracted to men at all, you're bisexual. You're just more attracted to women.

Attraction vs Action

MSM

MSMW

WSW

WSWM

It’s what you do that counts not what you call yourselves.

The gay kind, presumably.

I’m not attracted to women but I am definitely attracted to trans guys with pussies- does that mean I’m bi or just still gay.

The kind that enjoys a visual more than the action.

R19 Gay in denial

R19 a guy having sex

R19 That means you fetishized women and you probably hate them

R23 is no doubt a mental health professional not some moron on a forum spouting nonsense.

r19 Androphilic bisexual. Trans men are biologically still women.

R25- Is that another was of saying I'm a Pansexual?

Unlike what R21 said. I consider myself gay so if anything I might be a type of bisexual in denial.

R13 It's 0-6 scale, not 1-5. And I'm not a homosexual

Men, men, men! I've been with my husband for 41 years and really never had anybody else. I dream about a man I used to work with, though.. back in 1984. He invited me to his apt because his wife was out of town. I went there after work, but turned around and went to my apt. I had a boyfriend at the time and couldn't bring myself to be some kind of whore. Thats what the men in my life would have thought. I was 19 at the time.. the next day he said why didn't you come up, I saw you pull up. But, times were different and I got tied down early. My younger brothers lived with me, too, and I would have felt so much shame , but, oh, how I wanted him. Fuck it, I'm a little drunk and high, but I still think about that.

[quote]Is that another was of saying I'm a Pansexual?

r26 No. It is a way of explaining why your attraction to male secondary sex characteristics overrides your clear indifference or mild attraction towards female primary sex characteristics (vaginas). A 100% homosexual male is not attracted to vaginas regardless of what body they're on.

R29- Interesting- thanks.

[quote]When it comes to just fucking, I honestly prefer women. Then I have this one friend, my bro, who I love cuddling and making out with.

Just the opposite here — I love being affectionate and making out with women but when it comes to sex, it's guy on guy.

... and now I'm singing "Bisexuals of Datalounge" to the tune of "Werewolves of London."

R29 although a heavy make out session followed by the gal, who is dressed as a man, giving a bj to you is fine as long as you don’t see any pussy?

A lot of straight guys would have no problem with that as well.

KD @ R13? Nobody likes a smart-ass -- especially when s/he's not that smart.

Based on my experience with bisexual men, all they do is lead you on then drop you to the curb the second they find a woman they want.

Nothing but a lot of straight guys with a penis fetish, they should be condemned to a grease fire.

Attraction is an invented concept from the humanities and philosophy people. Real scientists know that they are only dealing with an arousal sensitivity which exists in two opposing configurations, endo- symmetric (isomorphic) and exo- asymmetric (non asomophic). There can be ratios in the brain that model the excitability in a population of neural networks given the derivative of the rate of change of both opposing arausal states.

This is the reason why if you were to show pictures to a male and a female inside two separate different rooms, depicting an ass, a mouth, feet etc any parts, or even scents that they both have in common in their bodies ,then if arousal is shown, then they are both experiencing the exact same endo- symmetric isomorphic kind of arousal.

The only brains that have truly 100% pure unadulterated endo symmetric isomorphic arousal sensitivity are those referred by the non exact “ sciences’ as homosexuals. Being the rest nothing but a derivative of this pure sensory state that many “homosexuals” have.

Continuation….

This is the reason why the “science” will never fully describe it this way because it has many social and religious implications meaning that we are purer and therefore more favored by the Creator.

[quote]Attraction is an invented concept from the humanities and philosophy people. Real scientists know that they are only dealing with an arousal sensitivity which exists in two opposing configurations, endo- symmetric (isomorphic) and exo- asymmetric (non asomophic).

Attraction is a complex mix of physical, physiological, psychological, emotional, and sometimes even spiritual factors. There's more to it than arousal sensitivity alone.

Bisexual men = narcissists

Bisexual women = women who like fembois

[quote][R29] although a heavy make out session followed by the gal, who is dressed as a man, giving a bj to you is fine as long as you don’t see any pussy?

r33 Well, I'm a lesbian, so...

Also, secondary sex characteristics aren't determined by one's wardrobe. Sex chromosomes and/or hormones do.

I’m straight and prefer men

No amount of surgery can get me to have sex with a ftm, and she better not tell me to go down on “him” unless she want to make me feel like throwing out.

I'm surprised that Bi woman that likes both equally are the smallest percentage. I thought they would be the biggest one for bi women

If you read the Bisexualmen and related subreddits, it's mostly guys talking about how they have no attraction to men, only their cocks, and thread after thread of men assuring someone that they're "bisexual but [italic]heteroromantic[/italic]" and would never date or even kiss a man and how repellent the idea is. And from what I've learned, this is predominant type of bisexual male, while "biromantic" and "homoromantic" bisexuals are surely a minority. The reason many think that bisexuality in men is just a stop on the way to gay town is because 88% of bisexual men are closeted. And of the 12% that aren't, the majority are bi or homoromantic. That fact distorts and drives the perception that bi men just haven't realized they're gay. But most bi men are just downlowing their way through life and will never come out because it wont gain them anything and will severely hamper their prospects with women.

someone I know would tell me "a mouth is a mouth"

This person is in the closet and fucks everything...

Lady sprinklers are an aesthetic muse not a real life fantasy.

I swear only gay men who got dumped by a bi man are this salty about them. You’re not owed some type of forced commitment just because you’re sleeping with them.

What are lady sprinklers?

R44 as a bisexual guy, that's so true

While I am pretty much equally turned on by the sight of smooth puss and smooth hole/taint and I want to cum on each so badly I would probably never date a man; its just not an aspect that I am into.

And most of guys I fuck/got fucked by are not gay anyway so it's not like I would be able even if I wanted to date man.

[bold]Drop the B![/bold]

Oh, Christ.