I can’t help but wonder why Americans have such a disdain for foreskin

I love every aspect of a man and adore cocks, cut or uncut.

Aesthetically, I prefer a cut one. There's something beautiful about that helmet always on display...ready for action at a moment's notice!

If I see even a speck of cheese, I know its time to leave!

Visually, I prefer cut. My ass is not so discriminating.

Yes, you can dick me down, but I'm not sucking that thing.

I know we're in a minority globally and most men around the world have foreskins - but when I browse through dick subreddits, I just can't with the majority of uncut dicks - particularly with the low overhang or when hard, the foreskin doesn't retract back behind the head.

I know I'll get hate for this - but aesthetically, a circumcised dick is just so much more appealing. There are a LOT of really ugly looking uncut dicks out there. More than half.

I find them visually very unappealing and unattractive. A few are fine - those where you can barely tell - but it's not for me.

Love them natural

This thread is useless without...

and...

Mafuckin!’

I wuz razed rite.

My fuck buddy is a ginger with a pointy overhang and a mauve glans. I love sticking my tongue in there and exploring around. Then pulling on it with my lips like it’s laffy taffy.

Obviously, non-Americans are going to click on the poll and you know which of the two they are going to select.

At the end of day, we were all born that way.

Love that smooth gliding skin. Feels gooey.

It's the smegma.

[quote]At the end of day, we were all born that way.

But it can be fixed.

OP = Dickless Dick Cheese

R15 By that same logic, you should get a colostomy and get your asshole sewn up so that you never have to wash it.

I don’t care either way as long as I have free reign

R11 - it's generally only older Americans who are so revolted by foreskin due to long term brainwashing about cleanliness, aesthetics and made up medical benefits which don't exist etc.

In modern day America - the vast majority of newborn American males are no longer circumcised except for when there are religious requirements (Muslims, Jews and some Catholics).

Once the older boomer generation dies out (like R16, R14 et al) , this anti-foreskin attitude will die out with them. Most of the world's males are not circumcised.

r11, no, it's the TANG.

[quote] It’s a natural part of the human body.

So are skin tags.

[quote] I can’t help but wonder why Americans have such a disdain for foreskin

Is OP Carrie Bradshaw?

R21 we don’t jack off with skin tags.

It's not "Americans," op.

It's just a bunch of lunatic Jewish guys who are obsessed with cut vs. uncut.

They feel that they are superior because they are cut, and that having foreskin is some sort of physical flaw.

They're seriously deranged.

It's not brainwashing - we can compare and contrast with an analytical mind.

They just aren't aesthetically pleasing as cut cocks. Some are just fucking ugly - the veins carrying over the the whole dick, the overhang, the white dots in TOO MANY dic pics.

People have their preferences - I've seen both many many times. One looks beautiful - the other one usually looks unappealing to be kind.

Fuck you, R25.

That's YOUR stupid opinion.

And truly, no one cares what you think.

Mind your own goddamned business.

TO EACH, HIS OWN.

I have never personally liked it because it’s BEFORE the skin, but there’s nothing before the skin. Your body starts at the skin! So it just does not make sense. Therefore I don’t like it.

It's just fear of the unknown and also a bit of sour grapes. Aesop had to have been thinking of cut guys when he wrote "The Fox Who Lost His Tail".

Cut looks so much better. I don’t like the sweet potato look but that’s just me.

Sour grapes about what? Something I don’t remember ever having?

R26 - and yet - that's your opinion and no one cares what you think either. Minding my own damn business?

Little child, this is a discussion board.

Do you have any other questions?

I'm not R25 - but nobody is interested in your confected disdain and condescension R31.

I'd be interested to know what age you are?

The glans is ugly. Flat top dicks are so much prettier.

I don't really understand the fuss. Sure, I have a preference, but I've had ample experience with both types cut and uncut dick and don't run in horror when encountering one of the less ideal, the less preferred type. Leave room for surprise and you will find pleasure.

I'm an American with a foreskin, something of an oddity for my age in the U.S. because of a collusion between two uncircumcised men, my father (whose European father didn't favor circumcision for my dad) and my family doctor was European (and uncut, I assume.) My older brothers were circumcised, I was not, simply because of conversations between these two men who agreed there was no reason for it.

Being uncut never put me at a disadvantage (nor much of an advantage either). The only attention this brought was the occasional, "oh, you're uncut", and that more often than not from non-Americans who found it curious and against expectation. I live in Europe and so I'm in the majority now but this has no zero effect on anything and, as before, makes no difference. It's just another aspect of dick along with length, girth, shape, inclination, color variation, hairiness...

r25 boys are dying for your frivolous aesthetic preferences. To me a cut dick looks like a Frankenstein experiment. It's not just about looks. An uncut penis simply functions better, which makes sense considering we evolved to have one and ours functions differently from the lower mammals.

r29, I call it squid dick...

I've actually never seen one up close. I kinda want to...

Funky-smelling uncut dick was a bonus when I liked to drink and be a whore. Not completely swiss-cheesed rotten cock, but a nice sweet male funk. It's a bonus.

either is fine. but clean out your cocks if you have one

The first time i had sex with an uncut guy (and this was so long ago we had to be careful outside lest the dinosaurs stomp us) I exclaimed "You're uncut!" and he smiled, said "yup" and grabbed his and my dicks, both oozing precum, and docked them but using one hand could message them, rotating my dick around his inside his foreskin and I thought I would explode on the spot. He realized it and stopped since we'd barely gotten our pants off. We hooked up a number of times and a couple of times he made me cum doing that trick. He said it was better when you used just pre-cum, and introduced me to nipple play to make our dicks gush with it.

It's like leaving the shell on a prawn.

Save the anteaters!

Saul replied, "Say to David, `The king wants no other price for the bride than a hundred Philistine foreskins, to take revenge on his enemies.'" Saul's plan was to have David fall by the hands of the Philistines.

When the attendants told David these things, he was pleased to become the king's son-in-law. So before the allotted time elapsed,

David and his men went out and killed two hundred Philistines. He brought their foreskins and presented the full number to the king so that he might become the king's son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.

[Quote] The glans is ugly.

Turn in your gay card this instant, missy!

I'm relatively indifferent.

Having a foreskin is not going to make a hot guy less desirable, nor is being cut going to make an unattractive guy more desirable.

I am a 58 yo cut man but I find uncut more sexy, probably because it is more exotic to me. Also the very first cock I sucked, when I was 17, was on an uncut guy, so it may have become fetishized for me.

I am against circumcision because it is really unnecessary surgery of healthy tissue and probably very painful for the newborn. Why humans started to doing it their sons would be an interesting read.

That said, I think a cut cock is much hotter. The exposed cockhead is beautiful. Uncut cockheads when they come out of the sheath look moist, blueish, and intestinal or something. Not sexy at all.

It's unsanitary and can harbor disease. Ugly, too.

r48 Cut dick is unsanitary, it has nothing to protect it from ball and pube sweat.

I don't know why Jewish guys are so weird about uncut dicks.

They don't just quietly oppose it.

They have to actively campaign against it.

It's so weird.

Why is that? Is it a religious thing, that you have to oppose uncut dicks?

R50 It’s a religious requirement for them, although some modern Jews don’t do it.

Even so, R51 why do they have to be so vocally prejudiced about guys who are uncut?

It's none of their business.

They don't want anyone interfering with their shit, so why do they have to interfere with others?

Shed you're skin.

R52 Is this online or what? I’ve never seen Jews openly bitching about this. I have seen them making a big deal about their sons being circumcised.

r50 They're no different from gentile circ fanatics. They're just protecting their ego, but they hide it behind religion instead of medicine. To accept the foreskin as good is to imply that something is missing from their own penis. That's also why they force it on kids. If they let the kid have a choice they would most likely choose not to and that upsets them that their sons don't want to be like them. A happy uncut man is an affront to the cut man. They know cut men will go extinct if they give men a choice, it's like a virus that must continue reproducing.

I want my pound of flesh, removed.

500,000,000 Muslim men call bullshit on your demographic claims.

[quote]500,000,000 Muslim men

Like they matter.

"Most of the world's males are not circumsized."

Most of the world's males don't shower on a daily basis. Hence the reason for nasty ass stank sleeve.

Nasty

This turned into a stealth anti-semitic and islamophobic thread.

Jewish men do not sit around talking about uncircumcised dicks all day - ever. And they don't comment on it or care.

Some of you just make up shit - it's NOT a Jewish conspiracy.

I'm an uncut American and it's only ever helped me get laid. I've never been in a situation where sex was on the table and the other person went "you're uncut? Nevermind".

R49 “Smegma most commonly appears in men who are uncircumcised. It looks like crumbly cheese and usually has a foul odor.”

I’d rather be with someone who has a sweaty cut dick than a cheese stank dick.

[quote]Cut dick is unsanitary, it has nothing to protect it from ball and pube sweat.

Are you retarded?

Nashty as hell.

R63 we all have to wash. I’ve smelled pissy unwashed cut dick. Never encountered that with a natural guy. The foreskin has a micro biome that keeps it healthy.

R50, many people circumcise their boys -- it's not just the Jews who practice it. Even the British Royal Family circumcises their boys, as we learned from Prince Harry in his book last year.

I felt so sorry for the guy with the first uncut dick I ever saw, I was always nicer to him than I might otherwise have been. He looked deformed to me. It would be 10+ years before I saw one on someone I was fucking.

Turtlenecks keep you warm.

Nasty crotch is nasty whether fhe cock is cut or not. They both can be washed and kept deliciously clean. I’ve sucked hundreds of cocks, and enjoyed both uncut and cut. Also been repulsed by both types.

^Diseased whore.

Nice dick is nice dick and ugly dick is ugly dick.

And sometimes, it's spotted.

[quote][R50], many people circumcise their boys -- it's not just the Jews who practice it.

Yes, Jews are only 3% of the population, but according to the National Center for Health Statistics, around 64% of newborn boys in the U.S. are circumcised annually, mostly whites who are 60% of the population.

That's not even counting the ones who get circumcised as teenagers/young men. When you take those into account, about 80% of American males are circumcised, overall.

The highest rates are in the conservative, very white Midwest.

The lowest rates are in the ultra-liberal, more diverse West Coast.

When I was little, I thought the reason why Americans were circumcised and Europeans were not was because after a few centuries of separation, the European immigrants evolved to not need a foreskin in the New World.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Foreskins are God's turtlenecks for the penis

“ .. but it’s just like any other part .. “

No. It’s not. A man with a foreskin can walk from the bathtub to the bedroom and will smell 30 seconds after drying off. Whether it’s the smell, the feel, the look, or the taste - quit saying they’re just as clean as a cut one. No. They’re not.

As for being a natural body part, so are fingernails and hair. Yet you cut them.

r78 Fingernails and hair grow back, dumbass, they're not a finely tuned sexual body part. Mine doesn't smell, never smelled anything on other intact guys either. Maybe smells are caused by using harsh soaps which throw the microbiome out of whack. Cut dick is exposed to swamp crotch sweat, it has to develop a thicker skin to protect itself without a microbiome and the urethra often becomes smaller from constant abrasion. If you cut your eyelids off your eyes won't be cleaner.

Circumcision prevents cancer and venereal diseases. But why does the topic keep coming up? It's like Samsung vs Apple. Who really gives a shit?. They both work.

The weird thing is that it really only became common in the US in the 1940-50s and movies into the 1960s-70s even made jokes about assuming that if someone were circumcized, he was jewish.

Given the rabid anti-semitism in the US and clear association of circumcision with them, I'm moderately surprised that it became so readily adopted.

Why are Jewish men circumcised?

Because Jewish women won't buy something that isn't 20% off!

R79 - you are noseblind to it.

Smegma and a touch of fecal material. For many an afternoon oral delight.

In theory it could all be truly squeaky clean. In theory.

[quote] I can’t help but wonder

Try

boys are dying

No they're not, stupid ass retard, sour grapes because your parent didn't cut you perhaps?

My first boyfriend who I really fell hard for, total lust, was uncut with a gorgeous thick 7.5” dick and that did it for me! So sensual and so hot. (I’m cut)

He was on point about personal hygiene though. Makes all the difference. I wonder if some of you foreskin haters also have a history of chasing unwashed lazy straight-acting tops.

[quote] Circumcision prevents cancer

In the same way that removing your tongue would prevent tongue cancer R80. But would you casually describe removing your tongue as “cancer prevention”? No.

r88 Read the attached info from your own country.

R89 I’m not British lol. Penile cancer isn’t a meaningful risk to advocate for mass circumcision. Just like mastectomies are not provided for every woman to rule out breast cancer. Do you think that’s a good idea? But hey enjoy your unnecessary scar tissue.

And then there is the less hiv and std with those who have been circumcised . That has to do with less germs and a breeding ground for infection that the circumcised dont have but the uncircumcised do.

..

Foreskin is what savages keep.

Some people like sex with savages.

Some don't.

You can do so much more with an uncut dick than you can with a cut dick.

Hours of entertainment to be had.

R91 it’s a special kind of gay guy that uses HIV as an argumentative technique against other gay men lol. That scar tissue went to your brain.

R94 it’s called public health epidemiology. The circumcised have less infections. You don’t have to like that. But it’s science not an argument.

R95 it’s called you being an asshole and projecting homophobic HIV arguments onto other gay men becuase you’re pissed with your parents that they fucked with your sexual function. Btw it’s fewer not less.

R96 you argue , slurs , personal opinions and name calling I am stating scientific facts. You don’t have to like the facts.

R97 The fact is that while statistics show that infection and sexually transmitted disease rates are higher among uncircumcised men, engaging in proper hygiene greatly reduces that risk. So if you're a clean teen, you're good to go.

R96 and are you moronic enough to argue that circumcised men don’t get less penile cancer likely because they avoid certain STDs?

That would make you look stupid if you did

What kind of man or alleged gay man does not care about increased cancer of the penis risk in other men?

Whenever I see these cut vs. uncut discussions and people talking about how uncut dicks are "dirty" and "gross," I think back to an interview with Dr. Dean Edell, a physician who used to appear on the local ABC affiliate here in SF and answer health-related questions from viewers.

Someone asked him once about uncut penises being dirty and unhealthy, and his response was great. He said that as long as you're diligent in your hygiene habits, an uncut penis is just as healthy as a cut one. He then went on to say that everyone always talks about dirty penises, but in all his years as a physician, he's still never seen anything dirtier than a vagina.

And so this uncut vs cut thread has devolved just as they all do.

Circumcision = mutilation

Most gay men will have a preference.....but we have a few sad, fat trolls, mostly those that dislike uncut men, who will just plink on the same one note forever and ever in a thread.

Forgive them, they're hangry.

[quote] What kind of man or alleged gay man does not care about increased cancer of the penis risk in other men?

Penile cancer affects 1/100,000 men in America each year. I’m not in favour of mass surgery in order to slightly reduce that number. Breast cancer is much more prevalent and a much more dangerous cancer, and nobody in their right mind would dare consider mastectomies at birth for every girl. You would correctly be called crazy.

Also R99 are you moronic enough to never have heard of the HPV vaccine? Torpedos your “penile cancer” argument in a non surgical way sorry ;)

It requires extra maintenance and we don’t like anything that requires extra maintenance in America.

R19 As of 2023 the CDC says 80%-plus of all US males are circumcised and that roughly 65% are circumcised at birth.

The rate is going down but to suggest "the vast majority of newborn American males are no longer circumcised except for when there are religious requirements (Muslims, Jews and some Catholics)" would seem to say there are a helluva lot more Muslims, Jews and Catholics in the US than I thought there were.

Catholics do not have a circumcision requirement.

Jews and Muslims combined total less than 4% of the US population.

There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world.

R207. It it was the custom of Euro-immigrant Catholics for many generations…up until the beginning of the 21st century.

R107 ^

[quote]There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world.

There won’t be when Israel is done.

R110 You don’t know what you’re talking about. It had nothing to do with them being catholic. It was an American thing across the board. Some Americans who happen to be catholic may think it’s because they’re catholic, but they are just ignorant.

What a world 2024 is , fewer boys are cutting the foreskin off but more are hacking their dicks off.

In the 1950s-1960s this would have confused a lot ,of people. Today not so much.

As a happily intact non-American, the US fascination with circumcision joins its fascination with guns as the aspects of American culture I find most incomprehensible.

I'm actually horrified at the fact that parents routinely cut off a part of their infant son's penis for any reason other than medical necessity and it is so widely accepted in some parts of the world that they have the perfect right to do this. I have had discussions with North Americans (men and women) who very strongly and angrily will defend abortion rights on the grounds that 'it's a woman's body so it's her choice' and yet refuse to see the same principle of bodily sovereignty should apply to baby boys too. None of the fairly flimsy benefits that are touted for the practice make up for this initial violation.

The heat that anti-circumcision activists get for professing their beliefs is also bizarre. OK, you yourself are happy you are circumcised, but does that mean you have the right to make the same choice for your son and/or should condone other parents making that same choice?

R113. I didn’t write that it was because they were Catholic, did I? Learn to read, if you capable.

if you are*

…which seems in doubt.

BTW as someone who has seen more than his fair share of cocks, i sometimes don't even notice if someone is circumcised or not. The only real difference from the sex partner's point of view is that cut cocks are a little harder to manipulate sexually.

If you choose to get fucked, you will certainly feel the difference.

R10, that cock makes me all tingly down there. Thanks!

[quote] Learn to read, if you capable.

The smug comprehension scolding error is my favourite type of error.

Smug people don’t read the immediately following correction—they just post for the sake of posting.

Favorite!

R122 girl chill out, you fucked up while trying to lecture someone about fucking up, it’s funny it’s not that serious.

Where’s that girl? I don’t see one.

[quote] Foreskin is what savages keep.

This is the nelliest thing anyone has EVER posted on the DL.

There are good cocks in either side. I just wished the non-consensual mutilation didn't happened to infants. Sure, have all the circumcisions you want once you're of age , but it just seem wrong to do it forcedly to infants.

I think the cut crowd are so traumatized they have to try make the intact crowd "less than" by painting something so natural as being bad or dirty.

How many uncircumcised adult men in the US (or elsewhere) choose to be circumcised? Vanishingly few.

If we somehow managed to convince people of the principle that parents should not make this choice for their infant sons (but knock yourself out when you turn 18 boys) the practice would vanish.

r127 Circumcision is much more complicated and painful for adults. Babies don't remember a few minutes of pain. Please get a hobby.

Forced procedures is not a good look.

[quote] Babies don't remember a few minutes of pain.

Absolutely crazy thing to say about a newborn baby. Shows how upside down the practice is.

I still have nightmares about the moyel edging closer. 🫣

r129 Wrongo. Babies can die from it. Never heard of that happening with the tiny minority of adults who get cut. An adult can take pain meds, tell the doctor which parts he wants removed, their wound is not exposed to feces and urine in a diaper, adult cuts don't get skin bridges, the foreskin in adults does not have to be violently torn apart from the glans like it does in babies. It wasn't until recently that they stopped claiming babies can't feel pain. They used to perform heart surgery on infants without anesthesia.

Circumcision was the original holocaust.^

I don’t know. I was only ever into cut dicks but then I moved to Italy and you kinda have to deal with them. I guess I’m not a fan because I don’t know exactly how to please them. And some are really crazy looking when the skin pulls back and reveals all that underbelly. They can be very David Kronenburg-esque. I feel like I’m sucking my dog. And then I think about what I am sucking that’s been there all day tucked up underneath that skin. I also like see a dick head in a pants imprint. But then I just channel my inner slut and get to work.

Kinda?!

R129 babies don't remember anything. So you're saying that means you can do anything you like to them? Oh dear.

Jews remember everything! Except that one thing.

Why can’t Europe ever understand how it works?

r135 it's all about the movement of the skin. The tip of the foreskin has an elastic band connected to the frenulum, which feels great when it snaps behind the corona and then snaps back over again. And don't touch the glans directly with your hand, always use the foreskin as a shield. A rough hand on the glans is like nails on a chalkboard. Only tongue and hole should touch it directly. It's funny because I notice all cut guys I've been with don't touch their glans when they jack off. They just keep their hand below it on the shaft.

R139, I am cut and a lot of guys work the head and the glans with their hand. I know I do. And your description sounds as complicated as a playing the bagpipes. I think you JUST nailed why a lot of cut men prefer cut. I think an uncut dick is too much like a pussy with one too many moving and delicate parts that you have work in a particular order to bring any kind of pleasure and one wrong thing delivers the exact opposite response.

[quote] I think an uncut dick is too much like a pussy with one too many moving and delicate parts that you have work in a particular order to bring any kind of pleasure and one wrong thing delivers the exact opposite response.

Seems like a skill issue on your end R140. Tbh the main interruptor of a good vibe is a cut guy constantly having to reach for lube because his dick has gone dry and can’t self lubricate.

R139 you’re wrong—sorry. The point where the hand meets the rim or “edge” of the fully exposed glans is the key to the whole thing.

R139 nothing wrong with touching the glans as long as you're gentle: admittedly this is harder for circumcised guys to judge.

It’s not harder—so long as it’s hard.

[quote]In modern day America - the vast majority of newborn American males are no longer circumcised except for when there are religious requirements (Muslims, Jews and some Catholics).

Not true at all. Circumcision is still the standard.

I'm a whore who's fucked everyone, and I prefer cut dicks. I don't mind uncut dicks as long as they're clean but I've had a lot of slimy ones. And I think a long foreskin that hands over the head of the dick is unappealing to look at.

I've blown lots of men, some cut, some uncut. Had a few times where cleanliness was revealed to be an issue, but the ones that had an issue were all cut.

Guess I got lucky and found hot uncut guys that knew how to keep their dick clean.

Isn't there a condition where the foreskin gets stuck, won't retract, and it can hinder urination and be painful? Fuck all that. I'm very happy to be "mutilated".

Some uncut dicks are ugly but so are a bunch of cut ones especially if they have a skinbridge or had too much foreskin cut off.

However there is nothing more beautiful than an uncut cock that is thick long and girthy some of y’all are missing out.

Filipinos from the provinces have some of the ugliest circumcisions on earth. Apparently it’s because in remote villages they are performed by some quack instead of a doctor.

R146 a real whore doesn’t choose dick. Dick chooses you.

You’re B-list.

I don’t understand the mentality of people who think uncut dicks are “dirty.” They are like any other part of the human body. If you don’t wash your asshole it will stink. When you wake up in the morning your mouth stinks, and if you don’t rinse with mouthwash and brush your teeth your mouth will stink all day. Your feet, balls, armpits, and belly button will also stink if you don’t wash them. How is an uncut cock any different? I’ve had many clean uncut cocks in my mouth and there was no smell.

I hv ate those scars on a dick. It look like vitiligo on it.

Its not the skin, its the smegma!

R142 this chart matches up with my experience. It’s clear to me that cut men stimulate what’s left of their inner foreskin. The ones who have no skin movement have to use lube. In my experience I find it difficult to get off just touching the glans by itself. It feels numb pleasure wise compared to the foreskin and frenulum.

They use the word INTACT like people use when speaking about their dogs or animals, they're nasty and apparently butt hurt with unwanted foreskin, see your trashy cheap ass parents.

Foreskins prove that there is no God. If there were He would have been so disgusted by foreskins He would have never created them. The very thought of them would have made Him vomit.

“See your trashy cheap ass parents”

Or parent. Medicaid doesn’t pay for circumcision.

Bless your heart r151.

Smegma is to foreskin as dingleberries are to the anus.

Save that fake Dixie shit for your cousin.

Yes R160. Wash it and those things will go away.

Only cut cocks for me

I know what I like, only cut cocks for me.

I obviously prefer cut - but I'm ok with maybe about less than half of uncut dicks I've seen.

The ones with the low over hang when soft, the ones where it doesn't fully retract over the head (some cover the entire penis even when hard), and the really veiny ones just turn me off.

It's very rare that I see an ugly cut dick on the internet - but it does happen. This link is an example of the ones I just can't. I'd rather go to bed hungry.

!Delicioso!

R165 you’re crazy! That’s a beautiful hunk a cock right there. It’s supposed to cover it when hard otherwise if we got a boner the bare glans would rub against our clothing and it would feel weird. It’s odd how people hate the very thing that makes the penis comfortable and functional.

Do you really need to look at a penis? They aren't really decorative items.

R167 - cut men's bare glans rub against underwear all the time. Not weird.

R168 - yes - men are visual. Do men really need to look at breasts or vaginas? The trillions of porn magazines and porn videos would tell you YES. What a silly question.

R168 They are if the man is sexy.

[quote] cut men's bare glans rub against underwear all the time. Not weird.

R169 it doesn’t feel weird bc your dick has been desensitized from being circumcised. Duh.

So foreskin is needed because the few times you get a boner fully clothed, it's less weird. Ok - got it!

I think you need to buy less abrasive underwear because I still have no clue what you're going on about. What kinds of sand-paper material are you wearing?

And trust me and all cut men - the head of our penises are still very sensitive. They're not like scabbed over bottoms of your feet.

[quote]that cut cocks are a little harder to manipulate sexually.

No, you don’t have to be extra careful with them like you do with uncut guys.

[quote] So foreskin is needed because the few times you get a boner fully clothed, it's less weird. Ok - got it!

Did I say that R172? Are you ok? It protects the glans generally, not just from clothing, and keeps it lubricated. Someone upthread compared it to an eyelid, not a terrible comparison. What it boils down to is that the human body has evolved to be fully functional in every part, therefore you’re removing function. How this is complicated idk.

[quote] I think you need to buy less abrasive underwear because I still have no clue what you're going on about. What kinds of sand-paper material are you wearing?

I wear cotton, and it would feel uncomfortable to walk around all day with the foreskin back.

[quote] And trust me and all cut men - the head of our penises are still very sensitive.

Sure, just not as sensitive as ours.

[quote] They're not like scabbed over bottoms of your feet.

You said scabs, not me 🫢

R156 is clearly Queen of the Unfuckables.

R174 - "It’s supposed to cover it when hard otherwise if we got a boner the bare glans would rub against our clothing and it would feel weird."

Are you OK or can you not read? I didn't address any specific post in the comment.

So cotton is really uncomfortable to wear all day against your skin - hmm. Seems like every other part of the human body doesn't have an issue with it.

Yeah right, the heads of our penises are SO desensitized because it runs up against cotton. How abrasive! I know so many people who say - oh God - I can't WAIT to get these cotton clothes off my body because they're just SO uncomfortable!

R176 I’m not that commenter.

[quote] So cotton is really uncomfortable to wear all day against your skin - hmm. Seems like every other part of the human body doesn't have an issue with it.

I said against glans with foreskin pulled back. This is the problem with this site, fucking geriatrics get confused so easily lol.

[quote] Yeah right, the heads of our penises are SO desensitized because it runs up against cotton.

Yep for 24hrs a day 7 days a week, with no constant moisturizing layer. I don’t know what to tell you but skin is a very sensitive organ to external forces, weather, sun, material, temperature. You’re getting very upset over something that’s very common knowledge!

I like being cut. There were two guys I went to high school with who were uncut and they were teased about being "poor white trash."

R177 - now you're not being serious. Unless you're a nudist - your dick is NOT being exposed to external forces, weather, or sun.

Talk about common knowledge. The only thing YOUR penis and OUR penis is in contact with is underwear (for those who wear it).

And I don't know what you're going on about needing a "constant moisturizing layer" - please. None of your skin needs that.

R179 you are dangerously stupid. I was talking about skin generally. Skin is sensitive to all external forces. Did you have your scalp removed by any chance? Your brain seems to be affected.

The skin inside your mouth is always kept moisturized. And yes that is skin.

Snouts I call ‘em

Of course we need to look at cocks r168. Men are visual beings.

This conversation is just fucking over

R128

“Few”

Over 100,000 maybe as many as 150,000 men get clipped after infancy in the US each year

Few , I would hope m would be the number of gay males who have their dick cut off. Tiny really tiny I would hope.

R184 150,000 men get circumcised *as adults*???

Really? Source?

The fact is, European-Americans are most likely to be circumcised.

The rates for whites are in the nineties percentage!

Face it, it's a standard of beauty in the U.S.

Plus, cut dicks taste and smell cleaner/better.

I love me some snouts!

americans generally do not have strong opinions about cock appearance nir about cut or uncut. its just some old gay ocd incels on dl

Foreskin is the labia of the penis.

R127 - if not done at birth, it can often look botched. Do it at birth.

R188: I am …

not old.

not 100% gay.

definitely not incel.

And still, I have strong feelings.

r191 do you like your clits cut too? Ya sick freak.

Got no dog in this hunt, but the only sick freak in the discussion is someone who’d call someone else a sick freak because they disagree. Can’t handle people who don’t have the same opinion as you?

r193 Your opinion calls for forcibly removing a body part that men enjoy. Hell yeah, that's freakish.

R100 Dr. Dean Edell was an ophthamologist. Why was he looking at vaginas?

Even a clean uncut dick can have a musky odor( not necessarily a "stink"), just because of the extra sweat and oil glands in the skin.

r196 it doesn't sweat under the foreskin.

The more appropriate term for a whole, all-natural penis is "intact," not uncut, which implies that cut (or mutilated) is normal--and it's not.

Cut cocks are great. I'm cut and wouldn't want a foreskin.

The anti-circ freak is a British guy who lives in the US and does his anti-circ activism here because in his native country certain religious minorities would be calling him racist.

^^You know nothing.

I’m just going to add this. I am the OP, but I forgot to mention this earlier. I am cut, however, I am cut loosely so I still have about half of my foreskin. I do not have smegma, yet I think my head is still more sensitive than most cut guys, because a lot of times when cut guys give me blowjobs, they suck way too hard, especially after I cum. Also, when I jerk off I roll the skin over the head.

Truth hurts r200. Circumcision is such a weird cause to dedicate yourself to.

The anti-circ loon needs to pack up and move back to his native Britain so he can preach to Muslims about how awful circumcision is. We'll see how well that goes.

Brit here. Recently chatted online with a fellow Brit who has a perfect circumcision: shaft-skin right up to the gorgeous bulbous head. My uncut status in turn excites him, he says he loves to play with foreskin.

He told me he was cut as a child, no great trauma memory, and was in the minority at school. Hence perhaps his interest and pleasure in foreskin. There's been no hint of regret or deal-breaking about this variation - rather, excitement at our difference and its possibilities. I said how I'd like to enjoy his beautiful cock, and the compliment was returned. Roundheads and Cavaliers can certainly get along.

Is there a more ridiculous topic on DL? Loons arguing about something only a minuscule number of readers could do anything about even if they wanted to and which the vast majority of men, gay or straight don’t give a second thought about. 99.9% of the time it is what it is and isn’t going to change.

If the anti-circ campaigner wants to reduce the number of circumcisions performed, why aren’t they screeching to the people responsible for the baby boys being born, people who are overwhelmingly heterosexual and unlikely to be found here on a gay men’s chat?

If you are circumcised and old enough to read DL, you are not going to be un-circumcised. If you have not been circumcised at birth, the chances of having it done post-infancy will be dictated by medical issues like phimosis and the frequency will range from very, very seldom to nearly non-existent.

I worked with a guy who got circumcised as a young adult . I don't remember why though he told me. He was straight and was the type who didn't seem to care either way but it was no big deal for him to have it done medically. And off this subject I asked him how he felt if a gay man came on to him being he was so open with me. He said no problem he would just let the guy know he was straight and had no sexual interest in men. No freaking out or anger. Unlike a lot of straight men who feel very threatened. Sometimes tragically to the point of murder.