High Court Judge criticizes both Harry and his opponent in their court case...

Barrister gives overview of the judge's comments.

From the recent comments from the judge...

[quote] “I have also previously indicated that this claim will not be adjourned and will be either tried in January 2025 or settled...

I wouldn't trust the judgment of anyone who wears their hair like Harry, he looks like a fool trying to cover his baldness

Harry would look so much better if he's just shave his head. That top covering is basically now orange translucent minge.

Most of you bitches know that you would suck my circumcised Royal rod if given the chance.

I didn’t realize Hugh Grant had already settled, back in April. His reasoning: [quote] Writing on X on Wednesday, Grant said he had been forced to settle or face a legal bill of £10m. Strict rules about costs in civil litigation mean that if Grant had not settled and had won the case his legal costs could have far outstripped any damages awarded to him. In civil cases, if the damages awarded to a successful claimant are less than the settlement amount offered by a defendant, the claimant may have to pay the legal costs for all sides. Losing the case could make a claimant liable for damages and costs… But the rules around civil litigation mean that if I proceed to trial and the court awards me damages that are even a penny less than the settlement offer, I would have to pay the legal costs of both sides.

Errr, okay. So Harry is gambling on a huge damages award.

Oh no, he didn’t!

r6 He won't settle. That's what those royal advisors he hates told him to do a decade ago and he's been railing against the idea that ever since.

First time in his life he's been accused of taking too long

I like this judge. “Obdurate” is a great word.