Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Megalopolis is a FLOP

[QUOTE]Francis Ford Coppola‘s sci-fi epic collected an anemic $4 million this weekend. With poor word of mouth, the film opened in sixth place behind three holdover titles and the Indian action film “Devara: Part 1.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78October 9, 2024 2:02 PM

I am reluctant to watch a movie with Adam Driver in it. What was he thinking?

by Anonymousreply 1October 5, 2024 10:27 PM

The clips on Twitter are already becoming laughable memes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2October 5, 2024 10:31 PM

I can't decide what's worse: the acting, writing, or directing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3October 5, 2024 10:33 PM

R3, all of the above and I’ll add editing. This was a hot ass mess! Most critics though are bending over backwards to praise this film and they sound fucking ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 4October 5, 2024 10:36 PM

It looks psychotic and I am very much looking forward to seeing it.

For free.

On TV.

In the comfort of my own home.

by Anonymousreply 5October 5, 2024 10:41 PM

Also, Adam Driver is abysmal. He needs to be channeling Joan Crawford and Charlton Heston.

by Anonymousreply 6October 5, 2024 10:44 PM

Great point R6. This would’ve been a great role for Charlton Heston and he would’ve been much better at it.

by Anonymousreply 7October 5, 2024 10:54 PM

It needs big actors who know how to fill the screen and not be intimidated by the silliness of epic movies.

I know there are actors younger than Denzel Washington and Jack Nicholson and Russell Crowe but few in their 40s and 30s is springing to mind. Mayyybe Christian Bale and Edgar Ramirez.

by Anonymousreply 8October 5, 2024 11:03 PM

This Driver guy…I just don’t get the appeal.

Yes, he’s distinctive-looking, but is that enough?

by Anonymousreply 9October 5, 2024 11:11 PM

I mean, we all knew it would.

by Anonymousreply 10October 5, 2024 11:20 PM

Joker 2 is the one that is gonna rock the industry.

by Anonymousreply 11October 5, 2024 11:21 PM

Another flop for Adam Driver.

by Anonymousreply 12October 5, 2024 11:23 PM

Driver is much better on the small screen.

by Anonymousreply 13October 5, 2024 11:59 PM

I haven’t seen it and I’m not sure it’s a movie for me, but I think the public has just decided to hate the movie. That just happens sometimes.

People who are actually going to see it like it though.

I may end up watching it anyway.

Driver is funny looking but he’s a good actor. Directors seem to love his work.

by Anonymousreply 14October 6, 2024 12:04 AM

R8, back in the day—in 1949, specifically—Hollywood gave us Gray Cooper in The Fountainhead as a visionary architect. Gary Cooper. And he had off the charts chemistry with his co-star Patricia Neal, too.

by Anonymousreply 15October 6, 2024 12:08 AM

[quote] People who are actually going to see it like it though.

No they don’t.

by Anonymousreply 16October 6, 2024 1:46 AM

I saw it the day after it opened and I honestly don't know what to say or how to describe it. Clearly it's a statement on leadership, art, dedication, politics, history etc. The art direction and cinematography was incredible. I also loved how they threaded the elements of ancient Rome into the modern world. It makes you wonder if Rome never fell, would it look just like what Coppola envisioned, NRPD on police cars instead of NYPD, brilliant. The scene where Julia was trading quotations from Marcus Aurelius with her father the mayor on the qualities of leadership were quite profound. But Coppola was trying to pack too much into it and it got lost. I'm sure there is a 4 hour version sitting on his desk someplace that we may get to see and answer all the questions.

by Anonymousreply 17October 6, 2024 2:38 AM

who is gonna pay money to see that ugly cunt? Even if free, not gonna waste my time!

by Anonymousreply 18October 6, 2024 2:43 AM

Jesus…the above clips make Susan Lucci and other daytime soap-opera actors look like fucking Bogarts and Hepburns.

by Anonymousreply 19October 6, 2024 3:00 AM

Also I loved that the dialog took on prose from time to time just like the play Charles III, also set in the modern world. Maybe this project was too high brow for people. It's clearly not a mainstream film. Also the fact that I'm still thinking about it more than a week after seeing it says a lot.

by Anonymousreply 20October 6, 2024 3:09 AM

It's hard to believe it's a flop given how handsome Adam Driver is!

Let me gaze upon THAT gorgeous kisser for over two full hours!

by Anonymousreply 21October 6, 2024 3:29 AM

He put up his own money - something like $200mm.

I give him credit for putting his money where his mouth is, but honestly, has he made a decent movie since the early 2000s?

by Anonymousreply 22October 6, 2024 3:40 AM

It just looks so, so great.

I love how Aubrey Plaza says "Two--the bank is mine" just like Charles Busch as Angela Arden in Die, Mommie, Die!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23October 6, 2024 3:42 AM

MegaFLOPolis

by Anonymousreply 24October 6, 2024 3:44 AM

[quote] I love how Aubrey Plaza says "Two--the bank is mine" just like Charles Busch as Angela Arden in Die, Mommie, Die!

Oh my god! I would have NEVER made that connection until reading your post! 😂😂

by Anonymousreply 25October 6, 2024 4:05 AM

looks like a turgid nightmare. i want to get really fucked up and see it as a joke.

by Anonymousreply 26October 6, 2024 4:41 AM

The CGI is laughably bad.

by Anonymousreply 27October 6, 2024 4:59 AM

I saw it tonite. It is a huge turgid turkey. 🦃

by Anonymousreply 28October 6, 2024 5:20 AM

[quote] looks like a turgid nightmare. i want to get really fucked up and see it as a joke.

I think that’s a good idea. I saw the hot mess and I can say it does seem like a film that could be better appreciated when you’re fucked up.

by Anonymousreply 29October 6, 2024 5:33 AM

Adam Driver is terrible in this.

by Anonymousreply 30October 6, 2024 5:50 AM

From the clips I’ve seen it reminds me of a TV show I would have seen in the 90’s on USA or Sci-Fi Network.

by Anonymousreply 31October 6, 2024 5:53 AM

Most critics I've read use a more-sorrow-than-anger tone about this, as though FFC at 85 doesn't deserve to be laughed out of town. Even the writer of the 'Sight & Sound' cover story on FFC, in a devoted interview with the director, couldn't muster more than polite baffled respect about the film. I'll see it one day out of sheer curiosity, with low expectations duly in place.

by Anonymousreply 32October 6, 2024 7:30 AM

The New York Times says it’s not a FLOP flop, but rather an “auteurist flop.”

[QUOTE]The auteurist flop is different from the box office bombs that litter theaters every year. These flops are not things designed by committee to haul in cash that often fall short. “Madame Web,” for instance, the Spider-Man spinoff from earlier this year that its own star appeared to disown, was many things, but auteurist it was not.

[QUOTE]Instead, these are opuses in which a brilliant filmmaker really goes for it but flies too close to the sun. Often they have their defenders, who insist that audiences were beneath appreciating them. Film aficionados can name some offhand: Peter Bogdanovich’s “At Long Last Love” (1975). Michael Cimino’s “Heaven’s Gate” (1980). Elaine May’s “Ishtar” (1987). Kevin Costner’s “Waterworld” (1995). Perhaps, even, Costner’s “Horizon: An American Saga — Chapter One” (2024).

[QUOTE]“A lot of these filmmakers are coming out of film school, they’re very arrogant, they don’t work their way up the ladder as the previous generation did,” said Smukler, who wrote “Liberating Hollywood,” a study of female directors in 1970s Hollywood.

[QUOTE]“That rise and fall,” she added, “is a juicy narrative.”

[QUOTE]Film may be uniquely susceptible to flop discourse, because box office receipts for theatrical releases are widely available and pored over like baseball statistics.

[QUOTE]Yet the ways in which “Megalopolis” differs from typical auteurist flops may be as revealing as the ways in which it lines up with them, said Mark Harris, a film historian.

[QUOTE]Harris compared “Megalopolis” with “Heaven’s Gate,” which was greatly anticipated as Cimino’s follow-up to his Oscar-winning 1978 Vietnam War movie, “The Deer Hunter.” Both the budget and length of “Heaven’s Gate” ballooned (its run time, 3 hours and 39 minutes, was actually a compromise with the studio), and its critical reception was harsh.

[QUOTE]“‘Heaven’s Gate’ was the next movie by the young wunderkind,” Harris said. “The narrative that got written almost before the movie was seen by anyone was, ‘Is he too big for his britches?’”

[QUOTE]By contrast, Harris continued, “Coppola is obviously not a young gun — he is this quite old and very revered titan of American movies.” His reputation, Harris added, “no matter what the fate of ‘Megalopolis’ is, is completely secure.”

[QUOTE]For some observers, the unavoidable flop discussion is a baleful byproduct of American movie fandom, a symptom of the country’s Puritanical obsession with morality and public failure.

[QUOTE]“A filmmaker who takes investment in a film and makes a film that is extremely gratifying and consistent with the filmmaker’s personal vision but doesn’t make back its money is taken as a violation of the moral contract — not legal or professional, but moral,” said Richard Brody, a film critic for The New Yorker.

[QUOTE]Brody, who recently published a rave of “Megalopolis” (as did The New York Times), urged observers to untether their judgments of a film’s worthiness from its box-office success.

[QUOTE]“There are filmmakers whose personal vision seems to mesh extremely well with the public’s,” Brody said. “I don’t think Steven Spielberg or James Cameron are doing anything other than what they see fit. They’re fulfilling their personal vision, which for whatever reason happens to reach wide audiences.

[QUOTE]“That is a determinant of what makes a good investment,” Brody added. “It is not a determinant of what makes a good film.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33October 6, 2024 3:00 PM

Leave it to Richard Brody, who is as much of a contrarian as Armond White, to praise this bloated mess.

by Anonymousreply 34October 7, 2024 1:11 AM

He’s not the only one. Francis Coppola’s fellow directors are circling the wagons. Steve Soderbergh, Guillermo Del Toro and Spike Lee are also on record praising it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35October 7, 2024 1:19 AM

The Filmspotting podcast made excuses for this bull shit as well.

by Anonymousreply 36October 7, 2024 1:48 AM

[quote]Maybe this project was too high brow for people.

Um, no.

This movie is a complete MESS. People were laughing as though we were at a screening of The Room. It's a chaotic, inflated, indulgent, stressful mess. The acting is wooden, the plot lacks any whiff of cohesion, and the morals and messages come at you like so many long dangly wieners slapping you in the face as you sit there with your hands tied behind your back.

You know the old adage "Show don't tell?" Coppola tells. He stuffs on-the-nose moral urgings into the mouths of the characters, and it is nonstop -- utterly relentless. Then, he shows. With the subtlety of Gallagher smashing a watermelon with a hammer. As in, a populist interloper climbing onto a swastika-shaped stump to give a speech. As in, a giant twenty-dollar bill hung like a flag. above a sea of poor homeless people. As for the visuals, it's a really odd mix of high/low. Amazing set pieces and costumes comingle with dated CGI and green screen. Then there is the horrifically graphic and cringeworthy cunnilingus scene between Audrey Plaza and Shia Le Boeuf which gives this noble didactic film, meant to inspire, educate and guide humanity, a needless R rating. Finally there are multiple moments where the editing goes off the rails and you are forced to endure split screens of chaos while Coppola shoves even more nonsense down your eyeholes at breakneck speed. There is simply no way to properly describe with words how weird, disjointed, ugly, strange and chaotic this movie is. You just have to see it to get the full impact, and to see how manipulative it all is. This film hijacks you and forces you to submit to its message, ramming it down your throat, over and over. The director doesn't trust the audience to connect any dots, to draw any independent conclusions or construct their own theories or meanings. I've never felt so irritated, confused, suffocated and trapped watching a movie before.

It's as though Coppola felt the breath of the grim reaper on the back of his neck and felt extreme urgency to just throw all the spaghetti he had left at all the walls, hoping to God that something, anything, sticks. That through this existential creative megadump, he might be able to die emptied of all remaining creative urges, sated and at peace.

by Anonymousreply 37October 7, 2024 1:53 AM

EXCELLENT R37!!! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

by Anonymousreply 38October 7, 2024 2:01 AM

I actually feel motivated now to watch it. If only he had not cast Driver…,

by Anonymousreply 39October 7, 2024 2:20 AM

Isn’t this the movie with all the leaked footage of Coppola feeling up dancers on the set? What a creep. Does he have dementia??

by Anonymousreply 40October 7, 2024 2:39 AM

Does Kevin Costner’s “Waterworld” really belong in the list of "auteurist" flops in R33? Poor NYT.

To judge by the clips and stills I'm seeing, the lighting and design resembles AI-generated images. Nothing auteurist about that.

by Anonymousreply 41October 7, 2024 3:07 AM

[quote] Driver is funny looking but he’s a good actor.

He's had his ears done, hasn't he? Good for him. Looks better now.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42October 7, 2024 3:16 AM

R41 Nailed it! It has an AI-generated feel in both the visuals and the dialogue. Especially the dialogue.

by Anonymousreply 43October 7, 2024 3:17 AM

MEGALOPOLISH??

by Anonymousreply 44October 7, 2024 4:16 AM

The clips I saw look exactly like a soap opera!!! wtf!

by Anonymousreply 45October 7, 2024 12:17 PM

Let us not forget that Barry Lyndon was panned when it came out as overwrought and overlong. Universally considered an absolute masterpiece now.

by Anonymousreply 46October 7, 2024 12:22 PM

R46, there’s no comparison. Barry Lyndon had a more cohesive story and the editing and overall pacing wasn’t all over the place. Stanley Kubrick allowed the story to BREATHE.

by Anonymousreply 47October 7, 2024 5:02 PM

I agree with R47, there is no comparison between Barry Lyndon and Megalopolis. Megalopolis is hyperactive, its all over the place. Barry Lyndon is totally cohesive. It doesn't genre-hop or experiment with an ever-revolving cacaphony of editing techniques. But most crucially, Barry Lyndon was not attempting to be didactic. I didn't feel scolded, cajoled and exhaustively morally schooled watching Barry Lyndon. Megalopolis is a brazen didactic teaching aid, for better or worse.

by Anonymousreply 48October 7, 2024 5:15 PM

In addition, Kubrick had the solidity of a distinguished 19th century novel and novelist from which to work. Fascinating to consider what so inspired him about the book. In any event, Thackeray can of course never have known that his creation would one day be revived so magnificently. At a guess, 'Barry Lyndon' will continue to be watched and revered at a greater rate, and for longer, than 'Megalopolis.'

by Anonymousreply 49October 7, 2024 5:29 PM

True R47-49. And most importantly Barry Lyndon was perfectly cast.

by Anonymousreply 50October 7, 2024 9:19 PM

DL Fave, Be Kind Rewind, just dropped an hour long essay on the making of Megalopolis.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 51October 7, 2024 9:46 PM

$1 million in its second weekend. A 75% drop.

At this point, it will struggle to make $10 million.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52October 7, 2024 10:59 PM

R41 waterworld is at least camp and entertaining

by Anonymousreply 53October 8, 2024 2:39 AM

I finally figured out why I find Driver so disturbing.

Dead behind the eyes.

If I met him on the street, I’d wonder if he’d kill me on the spot, or take me to a dank warehouse and kill me slowly for his amusement .

by Anonymousreply 54October 8, 2024 2:53 AM

R54, he’s just ugly.

by Anonymousreply 55October 8, 2024 4:30 AM

I mean this film bombing isn’t surprising. Anyone could see it from miles away. Studios didn’t want to touch it.

Coppola hasn’t made a good movie in decades.

by Anonymousreply 56October 8, 2024 12:36 PM

R37 nailed it.

And this movie will never be compared to Barry Lyndon, and shouldn't be. Say what you want about BL, but that film isn't a hot mess. Mega is a huge, smelly turd.

It doesn't make sense much of the time, and the incoherence isn't offset by the visuals, which are often amazing. As you watch the cast of great actors flail hopelessly, you know you're witnessing an abortion.

People at my screening were laughing at the screen. At the movie, not with it.

by Anonymousreply 57October 8, 2024 12:48 PM

What’s with these time stops? It sounds like stupid, unnecessary idea.

by Anonymousreply 58October 8, 2024 1:21 PM

An example of the ham-fistedness with which Coppola attempts to shove concepts down the audiences' throats at the expense of cohesion and storytelling is when Cesar Catalina's randomly visits his narcissistic mother (Coppola's sister Talia Shire).

There is no reason for this mother character, as we already have the Mayor character standing in as the one who doesn't believe in Cesar's vision for the future. But I guess Coppola had a narcissistic mother so he needed to unburden himself by committing this type of mother to film before he dies. That is my theory. Anyway, in this scene, Cesar's cold, unyielding mother goes from telling him what a disappointment he has been, to suddenly perking up and asking if Cesar has heard of something called "String Theory"! It just comes out of NOWHERE. My jaw was on the floor at this point. Everyone in the audience was dying laughing. She talks about vibrating strings for about five seconds and then goes back to being an unsupportive bitch. If Coppola wanted to touch on String Theory, this mother person was the last person on earth whose mouth he should have put those words into. She is meant to be a symbol of lack of vision, lack of progress. But ya know, FFC had a checklist of five thousand things he wanted to touch up on in this film, so I guess it had to be shoved into someone's mouth somehow before briskly moving on to the next and the next.

So when people say the film lacks cohesion, we mean it UTTERLY LACKS COHESION. Coppola had far, far too many aims and concepts which he tried to force together into a unified whole, and the result is about as elegant as a donkey wearing a Minnie Pearl hat with the price tag hanging off it.

by Anonymousreply 59October 8, 2024 3:03 PM

My goodness, string theory- this is so lame. He must be stuck in 2004. This is “metichlorine” level of stupidity.

by Anonymousreply 60October 8, 2024 3:13 PM

Does it have a least cool architectural models?

by Anonymousreply 61October 8, 2024 3:17 PM

Ish, R61. Most of the architecture of New Rome is just footage of contemporary NYC with an overlay of a few extra Roman columns here and there, and Roman fashion. Driver's character has a vision for the future, and it involves a glowing substance that he invented called Megalon, which can take any form. We do get to see the eventual creation of a new development made out of this substance. The space to build this new slowing structure was created by tearing down the tenement housing of thousands of poor people, who stand huddled, gazing through a chainlink fence at this new glowing structure. It is never made clear to us if these now-homeless folks will get to be rehomed in the new Megalon development, or if they are collateral damage -- the price of progress. It is also left unclear how humans would inhabit the new hypermodern spaces. It's totally, utterly unclear what the hell is going on, practically, with the Megalon structures. Just serpentine swirls of glowing substance. Yay, I guess?

by Anonymousreply 62October 8, 2024 3:56 PM

Not to be confused with Godzilla's foe Megalon

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 63October 8, 2024 4:00 PM

*Glowing, not slowing. Sorry!

by Anonymousreply 64October 8, 2024 4:01 PM

Megalon = Midichlorians

And giving a Nobel Prize to an architect/engineer is laughable.

by Anonymousreply 65October 8, 2024 4:01 PM

Wasn’t the Roman politics thing already done ad nauseam in Star Wars I-VI?

by Anonymousreply 66October 8, 2024 4:04 PM

I forgot that Driver's character was awarded the Nobel, R65! Thank you for the chuckle. Jesus. That is hilarious. And they bring it up a few different times, too. I guess Coppola really is getting THAT baked every day in his old age.

by Anonymousreply 67October 8, 2024 4:06 PM

Yes, R66! Yes.

by Anonymousreply 68October 8, 2024 4:07 PM

R63, I forgot about that Megalon. For me, the word brought to mind the amazing synthetic fabrics of the ‘fifties and ‘sixties, such as Dacron and Orlon.

by Anonymousreply 69October 8, 2024 5:43 PM

Did or did I not read recently if you saw the movie in an IMAX theater, there was a "live action" component to the showing?

I think maybe there is supposed to be an actor in the audience interacting with the movie somehow.

Is this true, or did I make it up in a dream?

by Anonymousreply 70October 8, 2024 5:52 PM

No it's true, R70. It's just one line in the film. This person is meant to stand in for humanity as a whole, and break the fourth wall, anticipate what the audience might be thinking, or fearing, about the kinds of progress and change that Driver's character is advocating for. In the film there is a reporter who says to Driver's character, ”Mr. Catilina, you said as we jump into the future, we should do so unafraid. But what if when we do jump into the future, there is something to be afraid of?” The live person was just supposed to talk over the reporter for that one line. I think maybe this happened at select locations during the initial screening.

*insert eye roll*

by Anonymousreply 71October 8, 2024 5:59 PM

Why do you think most film critics are depending and making excuses for this crap?

by Anonymousreply 72October 8, 2024 10:40 PM

R72, Coppola is a part of a great moviemaking age that’s gone and will never come back. One of the problems Coppola had in making this was that he couldn’t get the actors to effectively improvise. He couldn’t make spontaneous changes during the filming (or rather, he could, but only with disastrous results). Everything costs so much and needs CGI. We’re just in a different era.

by Anonymousreply 73October 8, 2024 11:04 PM

R73, I’m not seeing the connection between your reply and my question about critics licking FFC’s taint over this hot mess of a film.

by Anonymousreply 74October 8, 2024 11:18 PM

utter shite

by Anonymousreply 75October 9, 2024 1:15 AM

[quote]Why do you think most film critics are depending and making excuses for this crap?

Respect and reverence. FFC is old, bereaved, and spent decades pondering his bonkers fever-dream, and also spent about nine figures in realising it. His four or so masterpieces have earned him kid gloves.

The same ruefulness greeted 'Eyes Wide Shut', which is always so nearly good, but at least bears rewatching. Few critics wished to take down a genius such as Kubrick in his old age, specially when he was dying or suddenly dead.

by Anonymousreply 76October 9, 2024 6:40 AM

Jesus, he looks fugly in OP's photo.

by Anonymousreply 77October 9, 2024 9:43 AM

[quote]'Eyes Wide Shut', which is always so nearly good

Oh, dear!

by Anonymousreply 78October 9, 2024 2:02 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!