The Oscar and Emmy winner is attached to a drama project of Jonathan Franzen's acclaimed novel.
Meryl Streep to Lead ‘The Corrections’ Adaptation at CBS Studios
by Anonymous | reply 52 | October 1, 2024 9:20 PM |
It’s gonna be so bad
by Anonymous | reply 1 | September 27, 2024 5:56 PM |
A CBS series? My, how the mighty has fallen!
She's entering her Angela Lansbury era.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | September 27, 2024 5:58 PM |
God they've been trying to push this up the hill for 20 years. I guess they've thrown up their hands.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | September 27, 2024 5:58 PM |
No where does it say CBS series. It’s CBS studios. It may be a movie.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | September 27, 2024 5:59 PM |
It says it's a series, but doesn't say where it will end up. Paramount owns the rights, so it'll probably be Paramount+ or CBS. Unless MTV wants it.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | September 27, 2024 6:17 PM |
Are there parts in it for us?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | September 27, 2024 6:18 PM |
Hopefully it will not be the disaster that her movie based on “The Orchid Thief” was. Such a fantastic story ruined by juicing up the plot.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | September 27, 2024 6:22 PM |
Wasn't The Corrections one of the last of the pre-Amazon, pre-internet (internet existed but wasn't the end all be all of daily life) fiction books to make a big splash - sales and cultural coverage. Or do I have the the timing off?
I'm surprised it wasn't a movie already.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | September 27, 2024 6:23 PM |
She’ll never stop working.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | September 27, 2024 6:39 PM |
I have tried to read the book a million times. Nope. Don't get it.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | September 27, 2024 6:44 PM |
This novel is a masterpiece. A long slog, but worth it. Highly recommend.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | September 27, 2024 6:49 PM |
R9. I hope not
by Anonymous | reply 12 | September 27, 2024 7:11 PM |
Whatever happened to her leading in The Nix???
by Anonymous | reply 13 | September 27, 2024 7:46 PM |
R9 she's barely worked in 4 years
by Anonymous | reply 14 | September 27, 2024 8:14 PM |
Franzen generally grabs me so I recall reading this in a few days. A lot of the specifics were so early 2000s, but wouldn't be too difficult to change or they could have it be a period piece.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | September 27, 2024 8:33 PM |
R7 Adaptation is a brilliant film. I detest Cage and even he was great in it.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | September 27, 2024 9:30 PM |
It's a step up from the third-rate supporting role on Only Murders in the Building.
But damn, it really did all go to shit for her after Weinstein was exposed, didn't it?
by Anonymous | reply 17 | September 27, 2024 10:49 PM |
Her not working much is not due to Harvey. She had that long film run from The Deer Hunter to The Post. Plus her marriage fell apart and she suddenly had grandkids. Harvey had nothing to do with any of that.
This could be good but it seems light on details.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | September 27, 2024 10:53 PM |
How the hell do you make a viable movie out of that turgid, monstrously boring rhinoceros snatch of a novel?
by Anonymous | reply 19 | September 27, 2024 10:56 PM |
I thought it was a series.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | September 27, 2024 11:16 PM |
It was an Oprah Book Club selection back in 2001. Franzen didn’t want any part of her book club, so Oprah canceled his appearance on the show.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | September 27, 2024 11:56 PM |
[quote] It says it's a series
No, it doesn’t. It was tried as a series years ago.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | September 28, 2024 2:10 AM |
R20, the Great M would put her left tit in a Mix Master before appearing in a--mon Dieu!--TV series!
by Anonymous | reply 23 | September 28, 2024 3:15 AM |
R17 go fuck yourself. She made maybe 2-3 movies Weinstein's company produced. Miramax then Weinstein Company produced tonnes of movies.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | September 28, 2024 10:02 AM |
Tonnes are for the stage, you mean Oxcars.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | September 28, 2024 10:20 AM |
R21 what was Franzen's beef with Oprah?
by Anonymous | reply 26 | September 28, 2024 10:51 AM |
His literary nose got bent out of shape because he thought Oprah’s previous selections were schmalzy and overly sentimental, R26.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | September 28, 2024 1:20 PM |
I made the mistake of going to a live interview with Franzen about 20 years ago. Total weirdo: slouched in his chair and basically mumbled his way through the interview. Zero stage presence.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | September 28, 2024 1:29 PM |
Just in time for the 25th anniversary of the book's publication.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | September 28, 2024 1:41 PM |
Is Cooper Koch too young to play her son Chip, the one who shoplifted some smoked salmon by stuffing it down his pants?
by Anonymous | reply 30 | September 28, 2024 2:01 PM |
Meryl Streep is to acting what Jonathan Franzen is to fiction writing. Adequate, overwrought, and overrated.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | September 28, 2024 5:28 PM |
Franzen was pissed when lard ass Oprah put The Corrections in her book club with the other crappy books she was hawking at the time.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | September 28, 2024 5:36 PM |
I will believe this when it actually happens. In the past, they have announced projects with Meryl (The Nix, or Places, Please) that never happen or get passed on to lesser stars. She also supposedly was going to be in a Joni Mitchell biopic directed by Cameron Crowe but that also has gone radio silent.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | September 28, 2024 5:48 PM |
"Is Cooper Koch too young to play her son Chip, the one who shoplifted some smoked salmon by stuffing it down his pants?"
Which unlike most men, made his crotch smell BETTER.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | September 30, 2024 10:27 PM |
Meryl needs a producing partner. They float these projects at market but no one may bid if they don’t want to pay her quote. If she had a producer partner working with her (like Reese or Nicole have) she may have more success. With a few exceptions, gone are the days where an older stars can green light films or series on their own name.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | September 30, 2024 11:10 PM |
Jonathan Franzen, can you imagine. The man who's on record saying that Graham Greene is "overrated." I don't know about you, but I know whose books *I* would save in a fire!
by Anonymous | reply 36 | October 1, 2024 12:24 AM |
[quote]the Great M would put her left tit in a Mix Master before appearing in a--mon Dieu!--TV series!
I'm guessing you missed both season two of Big Little Lies and the most recent season of Only Murders in the Building.
No star is above tv series in the 20s. That's where all the best parts are.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | October 1, 2024 3:00 AM |
Plus HBO's "Angels in America," way back in 2003.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | October 1, 2024 3:04 AM |
I loved THE CORRECTIONS and loved CROSSROADS even more (now there's a great mother role for Meryl!). As I remember THE CORRECTIONS, it's episodic storytelling is far more suited to a mini-series than a film. And its fans would probably prefer to sit home than go to the mall to watch it.
I just hope that Franzen's involvement in this project won't delay the publication of his promised sequel to CROSSROADS (actually the second in a supposed trilogy).
by Anonymous | reply 39 | October 1, 2024 3:22 AM |
RE TV: In the '90s, Meryl did this ABC movie-of-the-week about a mom who goes to great lengths to help her young son with severe epilepsy.
Naturally, she was Emmy-nominated, but lost to Alfre Woodard in "Miss Evers' Boys" (HBO)
The other nominees were Stockard Channing in "An Unexpected Family" (USA), Glenn Close in "In the Gloaming" (HBO), and Helen Mirren in "Prime Suspect 5" (PBS).
by Anonymous | reply 40 | October 1, 2024 8:39 AM |
R40 Meryl did that movie to raise awareness of alternative, effective treatments for epilepsy, based on her friend's experience with her kid. It's one of the very few things she produced.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | October 1, 2024 1:12 PM |
R24 still she was exposed as the unscropoulos person, ready to praise and suck up to guy who was raping her young colleagues. And a hypocrite who jumped on me too train afterwards.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | October 1, 2024 1:27 PM |
R42 shut up. You then have to apply that logic to any actor or actress who had any association with him, including Judi Dench, Kate Winslet, Blanchett, Aniston, Pitt, Hopkins, Sharon Stone and hundreds of others. Why was Meryl so targeted?
by Anonymous | reply 43 | October 1, 2024 2:28 PM |
Jessica Lange and Shirley McClaine's Wild Oats was a Weinstein movie. Did they know too R42?
by Anonymous | reply 44 | October 1, 2024 2:30 PM |
She also did tv way back in 1978 and won a Golden Globe for Holocaust.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | October 1, 2024 4:11 PM |
She won the Emmy, not the globe. Her first filmed work was on tv
by Anonymous | reply 46 | October 1, 2024 4:14 PM |
Wow, I thought this smear of Meryl was over. It was organized by the right after she called out Trump at the Golden Globes, as if she alone was responsible for the crimes of Harvey. Sad to see people still believe it.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | October 1, 2024 4:44 PM |
Yeah, Meryl and Judi Dench were smuggling starlets to Weinstein. Jessica Lange was on door watch. Helen Mirren did the recording and Colin Firth was in charge of the NDAs...
Anthony Hopkins was head of the drop off cars.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | October 1, 2024 5:08 PM |
I think Rose McGowan's point was that Meryl was so well-respected in the industry...people would have taken the allegations about Weinstein seriously if she had spoken out publicly about it.
However, Meryl didn't even live in Hollywood, so I do think it's plausible that she just wasn't aware of it.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | October 1, 2024 5:42 PM |
I think Meryl did that TV move at R40 as a favor for a friend. It was a one-off project, and not really her attempting to "venture" into TV.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | October 1, 2024 5:44 PM |
The Harvey fiasco has less to do with Meryl and more to do with all the problems of show business. Everyone knew he was a bully and womanizer who bragged about sleeping with actresses and then they won the Academy Award due to his help (including Streep for The Iron Lady). They all tolerated him because he was good at winning Oscars and promoting films. And if someone else had sex with him for a part, they thought, whatever, that's on her. Or they didn't believe his stories about his conquests since it was hard to imagine an Angelina Jolie, Charlize Theron or Jennifer Lawrence doing this.
But I don't believe that many people knew that he was raping women and covering it up with NDAs. That knowledge was limited to Miramax executives, staff and attorneys.
Streep became a target once it was revealed because she was the Queen of Hollywood and joked that Harvey was "God" at an awards show. And yes, her mild attack on Trump caused all the subsequent outrage and made her the face of Harvey Weinstein's evils. But she only saw him during film promotion or industry events. She wouldn't know the seedier details of rapes and NDAs.
She did tolerate his known bad behavior (bully or womanizer), but they all did. She did tell her daughters never to go into his office, so she did know he was a bad guy towards women, but they all did. As a group, they enabled Harvey and probably didn't want to think it was worse that it already was.
Hopefully it is behavior that has stopped but of course it probably still goes on. The whole business is geared towards sleeping up and kicking down.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | October 1, 2024 7:17 PM |
Well said R51
People act like she was a friend of his. He actively cost her the Oscar for Doubt with his dirty campaign for Winslet in The Reader (which she later admitted disgusted even her!)
He also actively campaigned CZJ for Chicago and Helen Mirren for The Queen, meaning Streep lost for Adaptation & The Devil Wears Prada.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | October 1, 2024 9:20 PM |