“Queer”- here is a brief clip I was able to get

Don't we already have porn for all of this? Also, I can only imagine the fuss that is going to be made about Daniel Craig and Drew Starkey being incredibly brave for taking on such risky roles and daring to go where no other respectable actor has gone before. 🙄 Also, the projection frenzy will start soon and you will get desperate gay guys and even more desperate fraus, dreaming about Craig and Starkey being bisexual and in a secret relationship.

Moreover, Guadagnino's films are only interesting when they revolve around overt sexuality or violence, but even then it's mostly a matter of style over substance. Sorry, but no.

That was pretty gay

Does anyone else hate sex scenes? I love amateur pron but hate when Hollywoood tries to get naughty. It's never erotic, always squirmy.

On first glance, I thought this was Mystery Science Theater.

Did they use a prosthetic penis ?

It’s so obviously a prosthetic penis.

So I guess now we’re in Blue is the Warmest Colour territory.

It’s not a porn. Of course they used a prosthetic

I liked the meditation music added to the imminent frantic cocksucking.

I never got the appeal of sucking through underwear.

Do you think Daniel Craig is using the Method acting skills here?

This is nothing I know for sure, but, I don't think that's Mr.Craig's first experience slurping a cock, he strikes me as a good time had by all.

"I liked the meditation music added to the imminent frantic cocksucking."

Were there scented candles?

TY for this clip OP

A couple of things

A) the first thing I think of is that showing him doing THIS is inessential because it’s nonsense. No one does this (you have a guy on the bed in his underpants and you make out with his underpants covered cock? Is he Hasidic?)

B) the reason this is done is so the straight actor with the macho reputation can be “SO BRAVE” and “FEARLESS”. It’s so inessential. Do or do not the fellatio simulation, there is no clothed-cock-nuzzling.

C) this saddens me that a gay man made this because I think getting straight actors to do this is part of the reason this is in the movie at all. Luca gets off on it. And that says a lot about how queerbating is self-inflicted. Guadagnino chose to do this absurd scene to give himself a thrill. Have some self pride.

D) the explicit love scenes in Fellow Travelers don’t have this kind of falseness - even though they did have some ostentation - because two gay men were playing the leads. Having gay actors or at least one gay actor in these type of roles gives it authenticity. Having two straight actors do something so ostentatious takes you out of a scene like Nomi Malone’s imitation of a helicopter in Showgirls and makes the scene cringey. Even the love scene in Bros which was played for laughs felt more authentic than this.

E) It saddens me that this movie is named “Queer” because it reduces queerness to a fakeness like that prosthetic penis, something that is taken off and discarded by the two straight actors when the director yells cut. The rest of us “queers” have to carry it around all the time.

F) WHO IS THIS MOVIE FOR. Straight people don’t want to see this.

A. Yes. People do. It’s foreplay. Look it up. Some people are into it.

So Jane Bond slobbers on a rubber todger through 3 layers of canvas. Très scandaleux!

Hold me Pussy Gaylore!

R13

G) Gay people don't want to see this.

R14 Yes .Straight actors do. It's Fauxplay. Hollywood is into it. Look it up on oscar nite.

If someone did that to me, I would start laughing and not be able to stop. So cringy! Total boner killer

R19 we are supposed to believe you’re a mature adult who’s had sexual relationships when you don’t know what foreplay is?

those are sluts and whores

This was before Hammer’s sexuality (if you can call sexual sadism sexuality) was known, but the love scene from Call Me By Your Name rubbed me the wrong way because the character of Oliver is portrayed as compassionate and sensitive, and the book Oliver is a considerate lover, and here you have the huge guy straddling a human whippet and it’s Elio’s first time doing anal and Guadagnino for whatever reason decided this was the way he was going to go? He is getting undressed like he’s either going to a) rape him or b) they only have time for a quickie because his parents will be home any minute now and they’re doing it in their bed. I would imagine their first time together would have a lot of exploring each other’s bodies and slowly removing each other’s clothes but Guadagnino decided that it made more sense to have a SIX FOOT FIVE MAN prepare to THRUST IT IN on a teenager who has NEVER DONE ANAL!

This is Guadagnino’s performative queerness. It isn’t about being authentically who you are or compassion or brotherhood; it is about getting your rocks off imagining a straight man conquering you.

R20 darling,

Everybody knows what foreplay is. Nobody does this, unless they are in the boys’ dormitory at Eton. It’s absurd. “Hey I got this guy on my bed and I’ve just removed his pants and he’s expecting to feel a nice warm mouth in 321 but hey, I have a better idea, why don’t I pantomime eating corn on the cob on his still-clothed dick?”

He’s chowing down on his jeans?

Bitch, please.

R20 what you're into is called Frauplay. Gay men find it laughable.

You're 37 years too late, Danny Boy.

R20 we are supposed to believe you're not a femcel frau who knows zilch about sexual relationships much less gay "foreplay".

Russell Mulcahey! Did Hungry Like the Wolf’s video actually have a point or were you just piggybacking off Temple of Doom’s vibes?

[quote]This is nothing I know for sure, but, I don't think that's Mr.Craig's first experience slurping a cock, he strikes me as a good time had by all.

There have been stories on our celebrity rumors threads about Daniel and Rachel being bisexual swingers. I find that totally believable.

R22 Guadagnino as a knack for casting actors you don't want to see rolling around a bed together then directing them to roll badly.

My BF loves when I rub against his dick while still in his underwear. Hands mouth both. I'm surprised to see people here act like it's a thing men don't do.

Guadagnino likes the aesthetic of UNCOMFORTABLE STRAIGHT MEN GOING AT IT. It makes him hot. He’s perfectly capable of directing them to act erotically clothed, he chooses not to do it in the love scenes.

Case in point, a small moment in Call Me By Your Name, it establishes Oliver as a dominating lover, but one who can also be gentle to his inexperienced conquest, who recognizes the power dynamic but is willing to go slow and give Elio space. Elio clearly worships him but knows he can be overwhelmed and maybe he sense heartbroken. The entire theme of their romance in one second.

Hot clip. Can't wait to watch this.

…and what does the actual love scene look like? Hammer is not even looking at him!

The audience silhouettes give me MST3K vibes.

wish it had been R35 the comments would have been hysterical!

DC is not straight.

R32 Oh fuckin Mary!

R32 have you ever had sex with another human much less made love?😂

R38/R39 Russell Mulcahey, let me explain something to you

You know how you showed up on the set on Highlander 2: The Quickening and told the cast, “I don’t give a shit, just do whatever and bring me more coke?”

You see real filmmakers take care not to do that. You do not want a movie to look like real life or real sex. It is a heightened sense of reality, a concept you appeared to understand in music videos but failed to maintain in anything that lasts longer than two and a half minutes, which I assume applies to all areas of your life.

Did no one see Love Is The Devil? Daniel was very realistic playing a gay thief/hustler fucking around with Francis Bacon.

She Hungary

[quote]A. Yes. People do. It’s foreplay. Look it up. Some people are into it.

Sure. And frottage can be very erotic!

Nobody who's good at actual sex likes wasting time with this nonsense.

People keep saying Craig has never been as vulnerable on screen as he is in Queer. They obviously have never seen John Maybury’s Love is the Devil (which was cited in a few Queer reviews last week at Venice). He rims Derek Jacobi, back in the ‘90s when that was all the rage in British drama. But he does it with credibility. The film also features Tilda. It’s still Craig’s best work.

I think people nibble and tease a bit at underwear but any top worth anything would just pull they’re own underwear down and shove it in his mouth.

[quote]Hot clip. Can't wait to watch this.

I can’t either…on AZ Nude.

R31 it’s one person on more than one account. He was born in 2005 and he doesn’t realize the shit he says exposes his age.

Anyone who has been sexually active for years has given a handjob or played with their partners cock through his pants or underwear. No one just rips it out right away and starts sucking on their first time together sexually, especially someone they genuinely like.

R40 put the shit in batshit crazy.

FYI you hilarious incels/ femcels: It's called a cock. Normal males post puberty know what it's for and how to use it.

I hope his still has some bush like this ^^^

Luca Guadagnino on Whether ‘Queer’ Sex Scenes Respond to ‘Call Me By Your Name’ Critics

I think the movie will be good

Pretty hot