How would you rank The Beatles' members from best-looking to worst-looking?

Paul, George, John and Ringo

Ringo (I’m serious), Paul and George equally, then John.

I would rate Ringo before John Lennon. I also think he's aged pretty well. At this point, I think Ringo is more attractive than Paul McCartney.

Ringo has aged the same was as Maurice Gibb did. (They aged into their looks, got better-looking with age.)

George Harrison, I've just always thought of as a sour asshole.

Ringo, George, Paul, and John. I like brown eyes

George, Paul, Ringo, John.

I remember the photos that were included in the White Album and thought George looked the best at that time.

That must have been a good time for George since he created the beautiful While My Guitar Gently Weeps then. I still think Something from Abby Road surpasses it, though.

Look, none of them were exactly going to land modeling contracts.

George Harrison was the closest to being classically handsome., though.

George, Ringo, Paul, John.

George always did it for me, and I never could understand how Patti fucked around on him and chose that druggie toad Clapton over George.

I'd put the fifth Beatle, George Martin, in first place

op asks for an order and then does not follow thru...

They were ugly, but the Stones were fucking PUTRID.

That's easy, OP. On a scale from 0 to 10:

John : -100 Ringo : - 100 George : 2 Paul : 2.1

They were all as ugly as sin, but John's 'Bitter Medieval Harpy' face and Ringo's 'Busted Potato' countenance, were particularly hideous.

I didn't think any of them were good looking. I agree with you R13.

George, Paul, Ringo, John. And I agree with what R9 says about George.

These days, Ringo would be ahead of Paul.

Paul, early Ringo, Geroge, later John

George, Paul, John, Ringo

Ringo easily outranks Paul now. I’m not sure how it happened.

But at one point, McCartney dyed his hair that elderly woman mahogany purple, and Ringo had his hair and beard close cropped with a bit of Just For Men here and there. And Paul looked simply sad, and Ringo looked hot.

George and 3 trolls.

Which one was George R19?

I wonder who was the most well endowed...

Yes, I always thought George was the cutest, bad teeth & unibrow notwithstanding.

Ringo, George, Paul, and John

Howard Stern once asked Ringo, “did you ever think you’d end up the best looking Beatle?”

R24, how rude

[quote]They were ugly, but the Stones were fucking PUTRID.

Young Keith Richards was hot for a minute. Mick was never remotely good-looking but had sex appeal off the charts. Someone on an older thread said it best — never has a man done so much with so little.

George, Paul, Ringo, Faul, John, other Faul.

Yoko

Keith Richards was never good looking, even when he was young.

R29 When he grew his hair out and his face matured a bit he was. To each his own.

Why so much hate about Lennon's looks?

Paul always had a very boyish look. But now he's old, he looks like a lesbian.

John was cute in his younger days but those British genes kicked in, plus he worked at making himself look ugly with the hair and glasses.

Ringo always had that unfortunate nose.

George was very basic. Nothing really stood out and the long hair never helped his face. Sometimes he looked like he had done too many drugs and had an unhealthy look about him.

In terms of objective handsomeness:

1) John, 2) Paul, 3) George, 4) Ringo

In terms of sex appeal:

1) Ringo, 2) John (overlooking both his obnoxious tendency towards preachiness and his wife-beating), 3) Paul, 4) George

In terms of likability:

1) Ringo, 2) Paul, 3) George, 4) John

[quote] Why so much hate about Lennon's looks?

Translated: "I asked an open question, and yet you were supposed to agree entirely with me about whom I ranked first. How dare you! The point of asking a question here is simply for you to agree with me!"

They were better looking than the Monkees.

R33, what about Lennon's face makes him the most objectively good-looking? Just wondering.

[quote]Ringo easily outranks Paul now. I’m not sure how it happened.

It's called a NOSE JOB

ANOTHER VIEW -

Surprising responses. As a boomer it wasn't about good looking, it was cuteness, youth, energy. Paul was the cutest. The rest took turns. John was not as attractive because he was married. George didn't project. Ringo was adorable but not sexy.

It was always Paul.

Why would Paul get a nose job? He didn’t have a big nose. But now his whole face shape has changed from round to long. It’s weird to see young and old together.

I don't think that Paul had a nose job. It just changed with age.

Ringo (and his cock always was divine), Paul, John at 20 and George last.

Not Peter Tork, R35. He was dreamy!

I think they all looked their best in the Get Back documentary. Paul was at his most gorgeous.

R44, were any of them homophobic?

Paul, George, Ringo, John.

George had great hair. Not every man can grow it as long as he did during the All Things Must Pass era and look hot.

I love Beatles threads.

George, Paul, John, Ringo

R45, they were born during WWII. Can we admit they were all probably socialized to be biased against “benders” or “fairies?”

The Monty Pythons certainly were, despite Graham.

George..... Ringo, Paul......John. I think George is the most attractive by a long shot, and John is by far the least attractive.

You're going to awaken the Paul is dead troll.

Yoko must have thought Paul was the best looking because she went for him first.

Why doesn’t anyone ever remember Shemp?

R52 I remember that idiotic conspiracy.

^Theory.

Every time we have a Beatles thread they he shows up insisting there were multiple Pauls.🤪

George, Ringo, John, and Paul.

[quote]r19 George and 3 trolls

Wasn’t that the band’s original name?

R32 He didn't work on "Making himself look ugly."

R41 = Helen Keller

I think John's nose was worse than Ringo's.

John looked like James Dean

Mike, Davey, Mickey, Peter

R62 that’s exactly how I picture John, and why I don’t consider him attractive.

Anyone think Lennon's eyes were too close together?

I guess it's a tie between George and Paul

Paul..Paul.. Paul and then the rest.

[quote]How would you rank The Beatles' members from best-looking to worst-looking?

Ringo's member was the best-looking.

George's was the worst.

I’m a lesbian and always had a crush on Paul…who looks a bit like a lesbian! George next and Ringo was adorable but not handsome. John always repulsed me. He seemed mean and not comfortable in his own body. Weirdly, I’ve grown fond of Yoko in recent years. Her Twitter feed is hopeful and arty and I’ve even come to appreciate her voice, which is haunting and reminds me of kabuki.

R70, why not comfortable in his own body? Just wondering

R70 -- I get it about Yoko's voice. Her infamous albums filled with shrieking and screaming have left people confused, wondering how she could call that music. But I’ve actually found some songs that are surprisingly beautiful, like this one.

And surprisingly, she’s been a major influence on musicians and bands like David Bowie, The B-52's, Sonic Youth, and even Lady Gaga.

Whitney Houston's favorite song:

John, how he looked in about 1965.