Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Disney television unit hit with 140 layoffs, including cuts at National Geographic

Walt Disney Co.’s television division is laying off about 2% of its workforce, or 140 people, as the Burbank media and entertainment giant continues a company-wide cost-cutting plan.

The cuts at Disney Entertainment Television will primarily affect National Geographic, Freeform and local-owned television stations, as well as marketing and publicity teams, according to a person familiar with the matter who was not authorized to comment publicly.

National Geographic, in particular, will see a 13% cut. No teams are being eliminated, the person said. The famous brand became a part of Disney with the $71.3-billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox entertainment assets in 2019.

The cuts come as Disney continues to cut costs in an attempt to save money and stem losses from its streaming business. Last year, Chief Executive Bob Iger said the company would lay off 7,000 people as part of a $5.5-billion cost-cutting plan.

Those targets eventually swelled to $7.5 billion in savings and 8,000 eliminated roles.

The company overextended itself during the streaming wars in an effort to compete with Netflix by building up Disney+ and Hulu.

Disney faced intense pressure from Wall Street in the form of activist investor Nelson Peltz, who demanded a realistic path to profitability from the streaming business and was seeking a board seat in order to influence company strategy.

Peltz ended up losing his proxy campaign in a resounding shareholder vote.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3July 31, 2024 11:05 PM

I'm more interested in this recent article -- linked to in the sidebar at the article above -- about employees suing Disney for telling them to sell their California homes and move to Florida for a project that the company subsequently canceled.

This could get interesting.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1July 31, 2024 10:29 PM

Eisner was an asshole but Disney was best under his leadership.

by Anonymousreply 2July 31, 2024 10:35 PM

[quote]Those targets eventually swelled to $7.5 billion in savings and 8,000 eliminated roles.

Magic!

by Anonymousreply 3July 31, 2024 11:05 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!