Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

JD Vance cannot separate himself from Project 2025 or The Heritage Foundation

As Trump desperately tries to separate his campaign from Project 2025, users on X have noted one big problem: J.D. Vance wrote the foreword to a forthcoming book by the plan’s lead author, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts.

On the Amazon product page, the promotional material for the book, titled Dawn’s Early Light, highlights Roberts’s role in composing Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation proposal for a conservative overhaul of the federal government.

The product page also includes a favorable review from Vance. “Never before has a figure with Roberts’s depth and stature within the American Right tried to articulate a genuinely new future for conservatism,” the review says. “We are now all realizing that it’s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets. In the fights that lay ahead, these ideas are an essential weapon.”

When the book first became available for preorder on June 19, Vance promoted it on X, writing, “I was thrilled to write the foreword for this incredible book, which contains a bold new vision for the future of conservatism in America.”

On the Amazon page for Dawn’s Early Light, the subtitle reads, “Taking Back Washington to Save America,” but an archived version of the page from June 19 indicates it was initially “Burning Down Washington to Save America.”

Inflammatory language in the blurb has also apparently been tamped down.

A sentence on the archived page that says the book “blazes a warpath for the American people to take back their country” now says it “blazes a promising path.” Another fiery sentence on the archived page read, “Just as a controlled burn preserves the longevity of a forest, conservatives need to burn down these institutions [the FBI, The New York Times, the Department of Education, etc.] if we’re to preserve the American Way of life.” It now says that those institutions “need to be dissolved if the American way of life is to be passed down to future generations.”

These changes, while slight, perhaps indicate a hope to dispel the emerging public perception that Project 2025 would wreak havoc on the country. Trump, undoubtedly aware of the plan’s growing unpopularity, has claimed, “I know nothing about Project 2025” and that “some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.”

But it will certainly be harder for the Republican ticket to distance itself from the Heritage Foundation manifesto come publication day in September.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8July 26, 2024 2:52 PM

What a disastrous pick for Trump!

by Anonymousreply 1July 26, 2024 7:56 AM

I hope this hangs around Trump's neck, all the way through to the election.

People need to see the connection between these people and Trump.

You vote for him, you get them.

by Anonymousreply 2July 26, 2024 8:01 AM

Pete would make minced meat of Vance.

by Anonymousreply 3July 26, 2024 8:27 AM

Trump’s “ handsome” piece of shit

by Anonymousreply 4July 26, 2024 8:32 AM

The Dems must explain the points in Project 2025 and not just assume that voters know what it entails. They just can't say " Project 2025" and hope to inspire fear and revulsion without explanation.

by Anonymousreply 5July 26, 2024 12:46 PM

I'm surprised that the political genius DJT Jr didn't anticipate that.

by Anonymousreply 6July 26, 2024 12:49 PM

Looks like Vance is gonna get Penced. Vance better hope Trump wins or it's his head!

by Anonymousreply 7July 26, 2024 1:44 PM

Exactly, R5.

Project 2025 should be in campaign ads.

That's what Republicans would do, if Democrats were proposing something so insane.

by Anonymousreply 8July 26, 2024 2:52 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!