Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Frank Luntz: Trump will win (but there's a chance to avoid it)

Selected key points from The Times (my bolds)

“I can tell you now, that unless something dramatic happens to Trump, I believe he’s the next president,” he says. This is a reluctant but realistic assessment from a man who once said “Donald Trump made my head explode”.

[bold]“I’ve talked to four potential Democratic presidential candidates in the last 48 hours,” he confides.[/bold]

Although we are at the Republican convention, he is gripped with the drama engulfing the Democrats over Joe Biden.

[bold]“Every single day all the people who have any influence are playing around with potential combinations,” [/bold] he says, referring to the frantic consultations and calculations by leading Democrats behind the scenes on how to move on from Biden and who to pick to take on a resurgent Trump.

“It is beyond boiling among donors and I hear from them too because many of the corporate clients that I work for are six- and seven-figure Democratic donors,” he says. “I’ve spoken to seven CEOs or billionaires in the last week who are at least half-a-million dollar donors to the Democratic Party or more, and every single one of them said ‘What do I do? We’re going to lose’.”

It was not the assassination attempt but the vibe of the Republican convention that convinced Luntz that it is all over for the Democrats, up and down the ballot.

“I was unwilling to say that until Monday night,” he says, referring to the opening night of the party meeting when Trump made his triumphant first public appearance since the shooting, in the convention arena.

“What I saw Monday night was a Republican party I’ve never seen before. Significant African-American participation, significant female participation, significant union participation. Groups that have always given Republicans a hard time are now giving Republicans a second look.”

The following night he watched as Republican Senate candidates spoke from the stage. “This is not just about the presidency, it’s also about Congress. We could be headed to a three-way victory for Republicans [White House, Senate, House of Representatives] that hasn’t happened to this degree since 2016.”

[bold]Could the Democrats turn the tide by ditching Biden and selecting an alternative candidate?[/bold]

“Yes they can but only certain people can do it,” he says. “They need three things: they need to show a measurable track record of results; they need to practice genuine accountability; and they need a detailed plan of action for the first 100 days and year of their presidency.”

This profile, that Luntz has honed in his focus groups, suggests a governor or mayor rather than a member of Congress. In his view, there are a clutch of Democrats to choose from who could make a go of it in a head-to-head with Trump. He lists potential replacements [bold]Gavin Newsom (governor of California), Gretchen Whitmer (governor of the must-win state of Michigan), Josh Shapiro (governor of the must-win state of Pennsylvania), Wes Moore (governor of Maryland), Roy Cooper (governor of North Carolina), Cory Booker (New Jersey senator and a former mayor), Pete Buttigieg (transportation secretary and a former mayor) and Mitch Landrieu (former mayor of New Orleans).[/bold]

Luntz adds that even if four per cent of voters really are undecided — and he is sceptical, he thinks they know really — [bold]he sees just three states that actually matter in deciding the election because of the American system of calculating the winner based on the states they win: Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.[/bold]

“It means that we’re going to spend two billion dollars on reaching one third of one per cent of America,” he says.

“The difference between the parties — and it’s a big difference — is that every single Trump supporter is going to be a Trump voter and not every Biden supporter will be voting for Joe Biden, and that’s worth a per cent or two. That’s when I realised that Trump will win.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99November 12, 2024 4:02 PM

Unfortunately he is correct. You can tell it is over when the head of the DNC, the black man who talks like Kristin Chenowith, said that by inviting Hulk Hogan to speak at the RNC, the Republicans were trying to appeal to "people who use the N word."

Meanwhile a meme going around Black Twitter has a picture of Obama with the caption "first Black elected President" and a picture of Trump with the bloody ear and his fist raised with the caption "first n***a elected President." So Jaime Harrison is correct; the Republican Party is now appealing to people who use the N word, but that is young black men who view n***a as a term of brotherhood and respect.

The fact remains, Biden has damaged Democratic chances across the board beyond repair, we will have a Trump Presidency, and Trump will. have control of both house of Congress. He will replace both Clarence Thomas and Alito with far right judges. And he will also position JD Vance into a leadership position so that he can run for President in 2028, which is something Biden did not even bother to do because he is selfish and vile.

by Anonymousreply 1July 20, 2024 4:07 PM

I think that's being a little hard on Joe... and I think Joe should go.

by Anonymousreply 2July 20, 2024 4:13 PM

That Luntz guy shares a wig with Elton John

by Anonymousreply 3July 20, 2024 4:26 PM

[quote]he sees just three states that actually matter in deciding the election because of the American system of calculating the winner based on the states they win: Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Shapiro or Whitmer are the two who have the best chance of carrying these 3 states.

Shapiro is incredibly popular among moderates, suburbanites, women, and never-Trump Republicans in PA who don’t want to vote for Trump but aren’t going to vote for elderly Biden.

by Anonymousreply 4July 20, 2024 4:35 PM

For those voting Newsom, why?

by Anonymousreply 5July 20, 2024 4:36 PM

This is such a joke. I can’t tell you how frustrating it is to see a party completely collapse in on itself for no reason. The entire party needs therapy.

Presidential elections are hard, incredibly challenging endeavours and a faction of the Democratic Party has spent the last month broadcasting the message, “We can’t win.” It’s unbelievable.

Next year when Trump is in the WH, a book will be published detailing the incredibly consultants who figured out the best way to a MAGA victory was getting inside the soft heads of Democrats. And they’ll say, “Oh yeah, before that debate we had our strategy in hand, we knew exactly where the cracks were in Biden’s support - starting with the Obama people - and from there it was easy to get the donors on board and get them to close the spigots on cash, etc. We really had no idea how easy it would be, how porous Biden’s support actually was.”

This will go down with Trump’s 2016 campaign sharing Facebook data with the Russians as one of the most effective strategies to win a political campaign. A new brilliant play in the playback.

And this guy enjoys talking to The Times because they’ll happily extend the narrative without poking any obvious holes in it because the British have little understanding of how challenging an American Presidential campaign is on the ground - they’ve nothing to compare it to - and they approach all stories of American politics as schadenfreude, the worse it is for the Americans, the more they enjoy it.

by Anonymousreply 6July 20, 2024 4:55 PM

*playbook

by Anonymousreply 7July 20, 2024 4:56 PM

[quote]For those voting Newsom, why?

There's a lot of baggage with him, and his ex-wife is a loon, but he projects a glamorous figure, and he's well spoken. I think he'd be the nominee Trump would be most fearful of. And people are dying for a youthful face. I think he'd attract people now voting for Trump, maybe not a lot, but more than Kamala.

Here's the best scenario: Kamala says she doesn't want to run for president. Biden drops out, and says Newsom is the best choice. Kamala is his vice president. This will never happen, but it's the most winningest path I can imagine.

by Anonymousreply 8July 20, 2024 5:03 PM

[quote]Presidential elections are hard, incredibly challenging endeavours and a faction of the Democratic Party has spent the last month broadcasting the message, “We can’t win.” It’s unbelievable.

Sometimes setting low expectations is a good strategy. People like supporting an underdog.

How did the strategy of “Hillary has it in the bag. She can’t lose!” work out in 2016?

by Anonymousreply 9July 20, 2024 5:07 PM

[quote] when the head of the DNC, the black man

Is that you, Joe?

by Anonymousreply 10July 20, 2024 5:07 PM

Frank Luntz has been wrong in the past. Wrong on the 2022 "red wave" see link

by Anonymousreply 11July 20, 2024 5:08 PM

Biden should never have run. He said last time that he intended to serve one term and be a “transition” candidate. Well, where’s the transition people were expecting?? This is entirely Biden’s fault.

by Anonymousreply 12July 20, 2024 5:08 PM

Frank Luntz has been wrong in the past. Wrong on the 2022 "red wave" see link

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13July 20, 2024 5:09 PM

Kamala cannot be on the same ticket as Gavin since they are from the same state. She was also his District Attorney.

by Anonymousreply 14July 20, 2024 5:14 PM

It's hard to take Luntz seriously in that wig.

by Anonymousreply 15July 20, 2024 5:15 PM

For those who question Newsom’s appeal, this 2018 New Yorker profile does a great analysis

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16July 20, 2024 5:15 PM

Roy Cooper or Andy Beshear

by Anonymousreply 17July 20, 2024 5:17 PM

[quote] I can’t tell you how frustrating it is to see a party completely collapse in on itself for no reason.

The party collapses for absolutely good reason. That reason begins with Joe Biden, a fundamentally corrupt and dishonest person, being elevated into positions of power.

by Anonymousreply 18July 20, 2024 5:18 PM

Nobody even wanted Biden last time. His campaign was DOA until he struck some back room deal with Clyburn to deliver South Carolina for him.

by Anonymousreply 19July 20, 2024 5:24 PM

[quote]Nobody even wanted Biden last time.

Sure, Jan

by Anonymousreply 20July 20, 2024 5:32 PM

Even if Biden eked out a win, and got the Senate and the House, he would have almost no power. He has no agenda, but even if he did, he has been so weakened in the public eye that he has limited ability to lead his own party to pass legislation. Plus, after midterms he’s a lame duck.

An 86 year old should not be leading the country. Why is this even being debated?

by Anonymousreply 21July 20, 2024 5:38 PM

It’s worth noting that, unlike Harris, none of the only potential replacement candidates Luntz proffers has been vetted on the national stage. That’s not an insignificant consideration.

by Anonymousreply 22July 20, 2024 5:39 PM

I agree, an 80+, either before or at the end of term, is too old to run the country. There is no need of it. There are no shortage of competent people to nominate.

by Anonymousreply 23July 20, 2024 5:41 PM

And Biden has been vetted, and is losing miserably. What misdeed are they going to find that is worse than a pussy-grabbing felon who leaves classified documents by the toilet?

by Anonymousreply 24July 20, 2024 5:42 PM

Luntz has to take a LOT of credit for the division in this country. Fuck him - he's always been right-wing leading and sucks up to their money.

by Anonymousreply 25July 20, 2024 5:47 PM

R24, my comment was in no way an endorsement of Biden running. It was merely to point out that - among the potential candidates to replace him - only Harris has been vetted nationally.

by Anonymousreply 26July 20, 2024 5:47 PM

Shapiro stands absolutely no chance. Democrats hate him over Israel, and he’s only be in office one second. No Jew is getting elected president, and I say this as a Jew. Don’t waste your time.

by Anonymousreply 27July 20, 2024 5:47 PM

The problem for Democrats is that they’re now the Moral Majority. They play the holier than thou game and Republicans aren’t. So when Democrats fuck up, it’s a much bigger story.

by Anonymousreply 28July 20, 2024 5:49 PM

Whitmer has the Covid scandal. Americans won’t vote for her. She was like a Nazi.

by Anonymousreply 29July 20, 2024 5:49 PM

Unless the power brokers are working behind the scenes to stop both Biden & Harris from running by coming up with their preferred candidate, this all seems to be a moot point since there is no reporting that anyone of note would come forward to challenge Harris.

by Anonymousreply 30July 20, 2024 5:50 PM

Moderates love Shapiro. The extreme-left might not. But this race is about PA, MI, and WI…and getting the undecided moderate vote is key there.

by Anonymousreply 31July 20, 2024 5:50 PM

Trump has already won. Democrats have nobody and the country is in total opposition to their policies and rhetoric. Joe needs to go in order to hold on to at least one chamber of Congress, even if it’s a slim majority. Joe is dragging everyone down with him.

by Anonymousreply 32July 20, 2024 5:51 PM

I’m not pushing Shapiro, R27, but he has been in office “one second” longer than 2016 Trump.

by Anonymousreply 33July 20, 2024 5:53 PM

Great big fat person JB Pritzker. Billionaire with the common touch.

by Anonymousreply 34July 20, 2024 5:54 PM

Luntz is right about needing to win the rust belt. A Harris/Shapiro ticket would be the most likely way for Democrats to win.

by Anonymousreply 35July 20, 2024 5:54 PM

This is all you need to know about Frank Luntz:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36July 20, 2024 5:55 PM

R30, if you read the Luntz interview he says he's talked to four potential candidates. If Pelosi is choreographing this - and I bet she is but even if she isn't - it would be really bad optics for any contender to appear to presume Biden goes. It's all part of the dance steps. Harris will be challenged. I don't say she won't win the outcome, she's got strengths, but there is a contingent in the party thinks she's not the answer and the polls don't show her all that much better against Trump than Biden, so there's bound to be a competition. I think whoever the nominee they will benefit significantly from the change of horses. There is no enthusiasm for Joe. I am very sorry he's going out like this.

by Anonymousreply 37July 20, 2024 5:55 PM

If Biden does drop out, he should only do so by passing all his delegates to Harris. An open convention will result in a sure loss to Democrats.

by Anonymousreply 38July 20, 2024 5:57 PM

Keep trolling, Debbie D. @ r29.

by Anonymousreply 39July 20, 2024 5:58 PM

Disagree, R38. My take is the Democrats need a convention vote if this is to happen. They need that excitement and they need the media coverage and, sadly in 2024, they need the fucking drama. If they put forward a strong, clear spoken, confident candidate away we go. The party platform for 2024 exists. The excitement should drive almost all hands on deck to support the new nominee. Biden, bless him, was up against concerns about his age and mental acuity for at least a year. The debate was fatal, if a slow bleed out. But I gotta believe at least a part of what is driving Trump's numbers is Biden. Enough to tip it. Elections want to be about the future, not the past. An open process with a fresh younger face emerging could wrench the momentum away from Trump, who is winning this by default. Then hammer on choice and the court and whatever the economic plan is in the platform and I think there's enough room to pull off a win.

I hate that this is happening, but it is, with no clear answer, except a commitment by all hands that when it's over it's unity hell or high water because like the old chestnut says: crisis = danger + opportunity.

by Anonymousreply 40July 20, 2024 5:59 PM

For R29: how to tell me you're a Three Percenter or a Qcumber, without telling me that.

by Anonymousreply 41July 20, 2024 6:00 PM

R37, I’d like to believe the best political minds in the party are working night & day behind the scenes to orchestrate what they believe will be the optimum result. Hell, that could even mean arranging for Sotomayor to resign & for Harris’s resulting SCOTUS nomination to sail through the Senate.

by Anonymousreply 42July 20, 2024 6:07 PM

R34 Pritzker is also a Jew. It won’t work.

by Anonymousreply 43July 20, 2024 6:08 PM

Frank Luntz has been wrong. Often. Just google "Frank Luntz wrong"

by Anonymousreply 44July 20, 2024 6:11 PM

Fat closet case Frank Lutz is a right wing hack. Why would anybody who would even consider voting for Democrats listen to this douche?

Try harder with your trolling, OP.

by Anonymousreply 45July 20, 2024 6:13 PM

Isn’t Luntz a Never Trumper?

by Anonymousreply 46July 20, 2024 6:14 PM

What a disaster.

by Anonymousreply 47July 20, 2024 6:15 PM

[quote]If they put forward a strong, clear spoken, confident candidate away we go.

That person is Josh Shapiro.

Kamala Harris is neither clear spoken nor confident on stage or on the campaign trail.

by Anonymousreply 48July 20, 2024 6:17 PM

The "no Jew is getting elected" people need to take a seat. You're living in a far-left bubble that's not representative of most of America.

by Anonymousreply 49July 20, 2024 6:19 PM

Luntz has in the last several years repented of many of his sins in politics. Whatever he is or isn't or was in politics, he is an undisputed master of language and focus groups, so ignore him if you want, but it's true. He knows what he's talking about.

by Anonymousreply 50July 20, 2024 6:20 PM

R148, I have never been a Harris booster. I was particularly offended by her ahistorical 2019 debate attack on Biden for working with Senate segregationists. But I am very impressed with her oratory skills. I don’t recall hearing Shapiro deliver a speech, but I’d be surprised if he could deliver a punch as well as Harris.

by Anonymousreply 51July 20, 2024 6:23 PM

Do the Republicans forget about abortion? These suburban women are mad as hell! And hell hath no fury like a Karen scorned. That and the economy...... Imma seeing a Blue Wave a Comin'

by Anonymousreply 52July 20, 2024 6:27 PM

Never trust a wig-wearing man.

by Anonymousreply 53July 20, 2024 6:30 PM

[quote] Do the Republicans forget about abortion? These suburban women are mad as hell!

And they can vote to protect abortion at the state level through ballot initiatives like in Florida, where abortion protections will certainly be reinstated while Trump will win by five to ten points.

by Anonymousreply 54July 20, 2024 6:37 PM

[quote]Do the Republicans forget about abortion? These suburban women are mad as hell!

Democrats should be hammering this every day on the campaign trail. Republicans aren't going to talk about it, they know it doesn't help them.

by Anonymousreply 55July 20, 2024 6:44 PM

Frank Luntz is a hardcore Republican.

by Anonymousreply 56July 20, 2024 6:47 PM

[quote]Frank Luntz has been wrong in the past. Wrong on the 2022 "red wave"

There might have been a red wave, but the violent attack on Pelosi's husband at the end of Oct by a crazed MAGA - turned people OFF.

by Anonymousreply 57July 20, 2024 6:55 PM

[quote]ignore him if you want, but it's true. He knows what he's talking about.

See R11.

by Anonymousreply 58July 20, 2024 6:56 PM

The Dobbs decision in June 2022 canceled the "red wave".

by Anonymousreply 59July 20, 2024 6:57 PM

Oh, OK. Wrong once. Got it. You're a giant.

by Anonymousreply 60July 20, 2024 6:57 PM

[quote]Oh, OK. Wrong once. Got it. You're a giant.

Frank Luntz, a veteran Republican pollster, disavowed work Thursday in the early 2000s to cast doubt on the science behind climate change and said America, on the whole, wants the federal government to “do more, right now, to address it.”

“I was wrong in 2001,” Luntz told an ad-hoc Senate Democratic climate panel. “I don’t want credit. I don’t want blame. Just stop using something that I wrote 18 years ago because it’s not accurate today.”

by Anonymousreply 61July 20, 2024 7:01 PM

Ok, so that's not a factual error that's an ethical error which was not the kind of wrong you seemed to be arguing. But you also seem determined to paint the guy as incapable of any kind of change or awareness or insight. Fine, fill your boots. It stands that he's made a respected, envirable and profitable career out of language, strategy and messaging and we're trading shots on Datalounge. All I've got to say.

by Anonymousreply 62July 20, 2024 7:04 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 63July 20, 2024 7:06 PM

Anyone who thinks Biden is winning this thing is completely delusional or demented.

by Anonymousreply 64July 20, 2024 7:15 PM

But r64

Surely you have realized that because Biden has won once, he will win again?

by Anonymousreply 65July 20, 2024 7:18 PM

[quote] Nobody even wanted Biden last time. His campaign was DOA until he struck some back room deal with Clyburn to deliver South Carolina for him.

Very true. Along with the back room deal with Harris to make her VP if she withdrew before her name could appear on primary ballots.

by Anonymousreply 66July 20, 2024 7:39 PM

[quote]Kamala cannot be on the same ticket as Gavin since they are from the same state.

I keep hearing this...I didn't realize that was a rule. Why is this the case?

by Anonymousreply 67July 20, 2024 7:49 PM

Because our republic has stupid rules.

by Anonymousreply 68July 20, 2024 7:57 PM

Is it a rule or a convention?

by Anonymousreply 69July 20, 2024 8:16 PM

[quote] Kamala cannot be on the same ticket as Gavin since they are from the same state.

[quote] I keep hearing this...I didn't realize that was a rule. Why is this the case?

[quote] Is it a rule or a convention?

The Constitution prohibits electors in a state for voting for both a president and vice president from the same state. It's why then-Texas resident Dick Cheney move his residence back to Wyoming in 2000 so that he could run with Texan George W. Bush. If he hadn't, the net effect of that close election would've been W. as president with Joe Lieberman (Gore's running mate) as his vice president.

by Anonymousreply 70July 20, 2024 8:51 PM

To be very clear, applying the rule to the Newsom/Harris example means that California's electoral votes cannot go to both of them because they are both from the same state as the electors. All the other states can vote for both. Of course, California has a huge number of electoral votes, so this is a problem for them. But American elections are so close these days that even if both the Presidential and VP nominees wer from the same tiny state it would be a bad idea. So it's not an outright ban exactly as it is a rule that leads to bad situations because of its consequences, especially these days, so it is treated as somethimg that shouldn't even be considered.

by Anonymousreply 71July 20, 2024 9:08 PM

I'll vote for the Democratic candidate (from the comfort of another country I'll never leave), but Biden and his circle have dug in with stubborn pride to prop up a man who looks like a bad corpse and whose few remaining faculties are in alarming decline.

Granted the opponent is a horrible and dangerous man, a criminal, who looks like a construction made of rotten meat and who, at his core, is even worse,, but Biden and his supporters have fucked up an already scary race in the favor of Trump.

The people advocating propping up the near corpse of Biden to run again deserve a boot in the ass. And Biden uses his few remaining cogent hours to plot "I'll show you" plans to sabotage the race. What a fucking disaster.

by Anonymousreply 72July 20, 2024 9:50 PM

[quote]To be very clear, applying the rule to the Newsom/Harris example means that California's electoral votes cannot go to both of them because they are both from the same state as the electors.

Kamal will simply switch her place of residence to DC. Rubio was planning to move to another state if Trump picked him for VP.

by Anonymousreply 73July 20, 2024 10:49 PM

Re: Kamala and Gavin running together, months ago I read a WaPo article about how the repubs had figured out how to get around the "same state" rule on the off chance Trump were to select DeSantis.

by Anonymousreply 74July 20, 2024 10:49 PM

R21, Trump is only a few years younger than Biden

by Anonymousreply 75July 20, 2024 10:51 PM

Frank Luntz is a fraud and a lying, closeted, self-loathing gay man

Why would anyone listen to a Republican who is trying to sabotage the Democrats?

by Anonymousreply 76July 20, 2024 10:53 PM

Don’t listen to Luntz, r76! It’s far easier to listen to the Biden or Busters who are trying to sabotage the Democrats.

by Anonymousreply 77July 20, 2024 10:56 PM

The millions of $$$ that Biden and Harris raised will get flushed down the toilet if the nominee is someone else. They'd have to run a campaign from scratch with no money.

Dumb idea

by Anonymousreply 78July 20, 2024 10:57 PM

R78 that’s false

It can be redonated to the DNC.

by Anonymousreply 79July 20, 2024 11:01 PM

The money is not an issue:

Campaign finance lawyers said the Biden campaign, and the president himself, would have a number of available avenues for the campaign committee cash if he does drop out or is otherwise unable to run — but all would run through Biden.

“Even if Biden is not the nominee, he would have the authority to direct his campaign treasurer on what to do with the remnant funds — whether that is a transfer in full to the DNC, to a super PAC supporting the new nominee or parsed out up to contribution limits to various other campaigns with the balance to the DNC or a super PAC,” Steve Roberts, a partner at Holtzman Vogel and former general counsel on Vivek Ramaswamy’s 2024 presidential campaign, told The Hill.

Tom Moore, former counsel and chief of staff to Democratic FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub, told The Hill that “the money can go several places.”

“It could all go to [Vice President] Harris, it could all go to the [DNC]. Or anything in between,” said Moore, who is now a senior fellow at the left-leaning think tank Center for American Progress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80July 20, 2024 11:08 PM

Most of it will end up in Hillary's bank account.

by Anonymousreply 81July 20, 2024 11:10 PM

I think Joe will take everybody for ice cream.

by Anonymousreply 82July 20, 2024 11:11 PM

Kamala was at an ice cream shop yesterday.. Some charity thing. I felt bad for the lil girls who were patiently waiting for their ice cream cups as Tyra Banks kept yapping away. This photo op was on TV for some reason.

by Anonymousreply 83July 20, 2024 11:17 PM

Chances that cheap ratty Korean wigs are still on Frank Luntz’s head in 2025? 💯 %

by Anonymousreply 84July 20, 2024 11:19 PM

[quote] Kamal will simply switch her place of residence to DC.

The top of the ticket is going to change residency?!

by Anonymousreply 85July 20, 2024 11:33 PM

Rugrat.

by Anonymousreply 86July 20, 2024 11:34 PM

It just hit me. It’s crime and the culture wars. That’s what it is. Even though crime is down nationally in some places it is not. But more so the optics of being weak on crime.

by Anonymousreply 87July 20, 2024 11:45 PM

R6 Because some who is not mentally 100% won’t step down. Theyre not making this shit up.

by Anonymousreply 88July 20, 2024 11:49 PM

R87, plus inflation and immigration. We are pretty much in the 70s.

by Anonymousreply 89July 20, 2024 11:53 PM

R1 is correct.

Trumpers are salivating about him getting back into office so they can openly flaunt their racism.

Already trying to normalize the n-word.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90July 20, 2024 11:57 PM

I won’t listen to this man.

He’s obviously the creation of some deranged doctor who robs graves in an obsessive quest to create life.

by Anonymousreply 91July 21, 2024 6:19 AM

My Sunday Detroit Free Press has a new poll showing Trump with a 7 point lead, 49-42, among likely voters in Michigan. I want to hear now from the Mighty Joe hawks who insist those of us who want a change at the top of the ticket are MAGA trolls.

by Anonymousreply 92July 21, 2024 11:10 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 93July 21, 2024 4:26 PM

It's unfortunate perhaps the Detroit Free Press' domain address is freep.com

by Anonymousreply 94July 21, 2024 4:29 PM

^ It's better than CREEP, Nixon's reelection campaign organization.

by Anonymousreply 95July 21, 2024 4:50 PM

Trump will win dogshit.

by Anonymousreply 96July 23, 2024 1:28 AM

[QUOTE] Could the Democrats turn the tide by ditching Biden and selecting an alternative candidate?

[QUOTE]“Yes they can but only certain people can do it,” he says. “They need three things: they need to show a measurable track record of results; they need to practice genuine accountability; and they need a detailed plan of action for the first 100 days and year of their presidency.”

And Kamala did none of these things. She should’ve threw Biden under the bus and made it explicitly clear how much different her time in office would be.

by Anonymousreply 97November 10, 2024 5:48 PM

Luntz’s hair looks very suspicious. Like Elton John's hair.

by Anonymousreply 98November 10, 2024 5:51 PM

LOL he was right in purposely omitting Kamala

by Anonymousreply 99November 12, 2024 4:02 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!