Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

First Look: Rosemary’s Baby Prequel Apartment 7A

Julia Garner and Dianne Wiest star in this follow-up to the 1968 thriller, centering a side character’s nightmarish untold story.

t’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation: How do you make a follow-up to Rosemary’s Baby in a way that expands on the 1968 classic without undermining its unsettling finale? Ira Levin, the late novelist who penned the original tale, failed this test himself when he released his own widely scorned sequel novel in 1997, Son of Rosemary. (It turns out to all be a terrible dream—which is almost more dispiriting than the rise of the Antichrist.)

The future for this malevolent child was left unknown at the end of the first novel and film, when the manipulated young mother (played in Roman Polanski’s movie by Mia Farrow) beheld her infant for the first time and managed to smile warmly, despite having been tricked into giving birth to evil incarnate. Producers who held the rights to the follow-up spent years grappling with what the next chapter should be. In Apartment 7A, filmmaker Natalie Erika James avoids meddling with Rosemary and her baby by shifting focus to a side character whose brief arc was no less haunting, tragic, and mysterious.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 53October 9, 2024 4:05 AM

They did a knockout job casting Roman Castavet.

Weist doesn't look a think like Ruth Gordon but I imagine she channeled everything into her performance.

by Anonymousreply 1July 17, 2024 3:22 PM

Dianne Wiest has never done me wrong, so I trust her. I doubt this movie can bear the oppressive legacy of the original, but I am curious.

by Anonymousreply 2July 17, 2024 3:25 PM

Look What's Happened to Rosemary's Baby!

by Anonymousreply 3July 17, 2024 3:47 PM

I always wanted to hear more about Mrs. Gardenia. I wonder if Terry met her before she died?

by Anonymousreply 4July 18, 2024 1:04 AM

I’m glad Dianne Wiest is getting more work. I remember an article from a few years ago where she admitted having to move out of her apartment because she could no longer afford rent. She’s a solid actress and should be seen more.

by Anonymousreply 5July 18, 2024 1:09 AM

Julia Garner is extremely hard to look at. She had the face of someone with Down’s.

by Anonymousreply 6July 18, 2024 1:15 AM

Is this about the girl from the laundry room who looks like the actress?

by Anonymousreply 7July 18, 2024 3:21 AM

Yes.

by Anonymousreply 8July 18, 2024 3:23 AM

The one where they tell her she looks like the actress who was actually playing her? That was such an odd thing to include.

by Anonymousreply 9July 18, 2024 3:56 AM

[quote]Julia Garner is extremely hard to look at. She had the face of someone with Down’s.

Great actress, though. Ever since "Ozark."

by Anonymousreply 10July 18, 2024 5:41 AM

Seems like an interesting concept and a way to build on, without interfering with, the original story.

by Anonymousreply 11July 18, 2024 5:59 AM

About as far-fetched as "Ratched."

by Anonymousreply 12July 18, 2024 6:21 AM

The character was written to have sex appeal. Also, it implies in the article she's not a completely sympathetic character. I would have preferred somebody who resembled Angela Dorian or Anna Maria Alberghetti at least somewhat.

by Anonymousreply 13July 18, 2024 7:43 AM

If she had been beautiful and alluring would it have lessened the impact of her being a victim in the role?

by Anonymousreply 14July 29, 2024 2:46 AM

[quote]r6 Julia Garner is extremely hard to look at. She had the face of someone with Down’s.

She has a great face. Especially for an actress. It can be dressed up, or down.

And she was so good in OZARK.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15July 29, 2024 2:54 AM

I have never seen Garner be bad. A face you can’t look away from. And her characters have been all over the place, she’s by no means one note. She’s a keeper. And I’m glad she escaped that Madonna biopic trainwreck

by Anonymousreply 16July 29, 2024 3:00 AM

"How do you make a follow-up to Rosemary's Baby?'

You don't. You just fucking don't.

Get your goddamn shit together, Hollywood, or else America won't be there to save you when Donald Trump puts you all in re-education camps and hands your studios over to Kevin Sorbo.

by Anonymousreply 17July 29, 2024 3:07 AM

Fertility was a big part of the story and I hope it sill is. I was surprised when I saw Mia Farrow in person. She was one of the most beautiful people I had seen in a girl-next-door way. This was sometime back in the 90s. Very porcelain like and quite adorable. Still womanly. Definitely a look that men would have gone for.

by Anonymousreply 18July 29, 2024 3:21 AM

Mia Farrow has a perfect, versatile actress face. She could look almost any way she wanted… either plain or fancy.

(In retrospect, she sometimes looks kind of like Gwyneth Paltrow.)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19July 29, 2024 3:31 AM

A funny thing to me is she campaigned hard for the role of Daisy in THE GREAT GATSBY, got the highly coveted part… but then when she got to shooting it she was pregnant and throwing up everywhere. Plus she hated her stuff wig.

So it went from dream role to nightmare.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20July 29, 2024 3:40 AM

^^ Hated her STIFF wig!!

Not “stuff wig”

by Anonymousreply 21July 29, 2024 3:41 AM

I had to do a double take on OP's photo—I thought that was a young Charlotte Rampling at first.

by Anonymousreply 22July 29, 2024 4:02 AM

I first noticed Julia Garner in "The Americans." Yes, good actor, but her appearance is quite unattractive to my eyes. That crinkly hair, especially, but also her down-turned mouth that's always got red lipstick for some reason..

by Anonymousreply 23July 29, 2024 4:28 AM

R15/R16 It's nice to know there are people like that, when you hear so much about apathy and people who are afraid of getting involved.

by Anonymousreply 24July 31, 2024 1:02 PM

sounds delightful

by Anonymousreply 25July 31, 2024 1:17 PM

Will Jack Schlossberg reprise his granny's role?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26July 31, 2024 1:51 PM

[QUOTE] "How do you make a follow-up to Rosemary's Baby?'

It’s a prequel. Do you know what those are?

by Anonymousreply 27July 31, 2024 2:23 PM

Your reply has a chalky undertaste, r24.

by Anonymousreply 28July 31, 2024 6:53 PM

Trailer is out!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29August 29, 2024 2:58 PM

R29, thanks.

by Anonymousreply 30August 29, 2024 3:03 PM

We already know how this story ends though

by Anonymousreply 31August 29, 2024 3:09 PM

She sho is ugly.

by Anonymousreply 32August 29, 2024 3:14 PM

I wish they could have convinced Ruth to come back and reprise her roll.

by Anonymousreply 33August 29, 2024 3:17 PM

A prequel about the building and it's history would've been a better premise. Could've gone back to the turn of the century and the witchey business going on in that luxury building.

by Anonymousreply 34August 29, 2024 3:18 PM

I hate how trailers now just show WAY too fucking much. Every key scene, every big moment. The audience is never trusted to be curious or “do work” in any way. It’s spoon-fed to them for maximum “clicks.” The trailer for “Apartment 7A” also looks cheap.

Look at how effective this trailer is for 2006’s “Little Children” for comparison.

There used to be a certain art to putting trailers together and it’s gone now.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35August 29, 2024 3:21 PM

R35 Yes, it did feel like they were showing us every keep point in the entire film.

by Anonymousreply 36August 29, 2024 4:10 PM

Yeah! Where’s the prequel about the Trench Sisters!

by Anonymousreply 37August 29, 2024 4:12 PM

*key point

by Anonymousreply 38August 29, 2024 4:12 PM

Another bomb.

by Anonymousreply 39August 29, 2024 4:28 PM

Just watch the original again.

by Anonymousreply 40August 29, 2024 4:37 PM

Shades of a young Christy Turlington @ R20

by Anonymousreply 41August 29, 2024 4:43 PM

1976! ABC Saturday Night Movie of the Week! Patty Duke! Ruth Gordon! Ray Milland! Tina Louise! Sam Maharis!

Desert locales! Midwestern Spanish restaurant architecture! Spooky buses! KISS-influenced satanic rock!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42August 29, 2024 4:44 PM

R42 Thank you. I’ll be watching this again instead. HIGHLY ENTERTAINING!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43August 29, 2024 4:47 PM

“What did the Times say?”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 44September 27, 2024 2:24 PM

I actually pitched a TV idea titled "The Branford" which addressed the building's early 20th century history. It went nowhere.

by Anonymousreply 45September 27, 2024 3:11 PM

Was Julia Garner in Dexter?

by Anonymousreply 46September 27, 2024 3:20 PM

40% on Rotten Tomatoes out of 58 reviews is not good. I have Paramount+ and even I may skip this.

by Anonymousreply 47September 28, 2024 1:34 AM

Anyone watching? It’s out yesterday.

by Anonymousreply 48September 28, 2024 7:53 PM

Watched it tonight. Rosemary’s Baby is one of my all-time favorites so I was excited to check this out. It was okay - not god awful but nothing I’ll revisit much either. It felt very rushed. There was no build-up to the impregnation scene and the fact she was Bill Cosby-ed by her boss never becomes an issue. I was disappointed there was no laundry room scene with Rosemary but the way the story plays out in this Terry was already suspicious so gushing about the Castevets like she does in RB wouldn’t have made sense.

Garner does a good job and Wiest is always worth watching. Much more watchable than the Patty Duke TV sequel

by Anonymousreply 49October 8, 2024 11:54 AM

I watched it last night and agree with R49. It would have been great to see a recreation of the laundry room scene to connect the two movies. TBH I could have done without the extended musical numbers. But it did dawn on me that all Broadway producers have sold their rotten evil souls to the devil. Unfortunately, they don't all look like that actor in the movie, most are trollish beyond belief.

by Anonymousreply 50October 9, 2024 12:28 AM

As I said in one of the other 7A threads, Wiest is much too fat to play Minnie Castevet.

by Anonymousreply 51October 9, 2024 12:36 AM

Why shouldn’t Minnie be fat? She’s not a Vegas showgirl.

by Anonymousreply 52October 9, 2024 4:03 AM

#BigIsBeautiful!

by Anonymousreply 53October 9, 2024 4:05 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!