Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Trump leaks panel list of Supreme Curt Justices ready for the Supreme Court

Sources close to the presumptive GOP nominee say he again plans to release a similar list in coming weeks or months. As he did eight years ago, Trump will be emphatic, saying he would only choose from the new slates of candidates if there is a Supreme Court vacancy.

As he did during his first election campaign and as president, Trump has been consulting with conservative legal voices, including those from the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation. He has also spoken with GOP members of Congress to seek their input, say sources close to the former president.

What follows is an unofficial list of potential candidates for the Supreme Court by Trump. It was compiled from a number of sources, including officials within his inner circle, and Republican political and legal circles.

His team is still compiling a public list that remains in flux, but these are some of the names being considered:

Judge Amul Thapar, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, chambers in Covington, Kentucky

Born 1969. Thapar was the first federal district court judge of South Asian descent, whose family emigrated from India. Trump interviewed him personally in 2017 for the Scalia vacancy while still a district judge, then became the president's second judicial pick when elevated to the appeals court. He was later interviewed by the president for the 2018 high court seat filled by Kavanaugh. Thapar would have the enthusiastic support of his home state senator, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Thapar was previously a U.S. attorney.

Judge James Ho, 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Dallas

Born 1973. A former Justice Thomas law clerk and former Texas solicitor general, Ho was appointed to the federal bench in 2018. Born in Taiwan, his parents immigrated to California when he was a child. If nominated, he would be the first Asian-American justice. In October remarks at the Heritage Foundation, Ho urged his conservative bench colleagues to "get comfortable" with criticism over their rulings, speaking out against "fair-weather originalism" over that judicial philosophy.

Judge Gregory Katsas, D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Washington

Born 1964. Add him to the list of onetime Justice Thomas law clerks who could make a Supreme Court short list. A former Trump White House deputy counsel, he was appointed to the high-profile appeals court in 2017, where Thomas, Scalia, Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts all once served. His age may be a potential drawback if the president is seeking someone younger who would presumably carve a longer legacy on the bench.

Judge Neomi Rao, D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Washington

Born 1973. Rao grew up in Detroit, the daughter of Indian immigrant physicians. Like her D.C. Circuit colleague Katsas, Rao was a Justice Thomas law clerk. After working as a private attorney and law professor, she was nominated by Trump to the federal appeals court seat held by now-Justice Kavanaugh.

Judge Barbara Lagoa, 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Miami

Born 1967. Former Florida Supreme Court justice, the first Hispanic woman and the first Cuban-American woman on that bench. A finalist for the 2020 Supreme Court vacancy that went to Justice Barrett.

Kate Comerford Todd, former deputy White House counsel

Born 1975. Another former Justice Thomas law clerk, she was given serious consideration for the 2020 high court vacancy that went to Justice Barrett. At the time, Todd was a key Trump White House adviser on judicial selection, among other areas. Now a private attorney, she could play another prominent role in a Trump administration, but her lack of judicial experience may be a drawback. Described as smart, principled, with a strong "originalist" view of the Constitution.

by Anonymousreply 11May 30, 2025 8:28 PM

I feel that any “justice” who pledges their allegiance to the tenets of a foundation or a society is fundamentally unfit. And I have no faith that Trump would not expand “his” court just for spite. Old Joe is a step too slow, son, a step too slow. I realize the politics of his day involved a genteel, moseying approach, but those days died thanks to Lee Atwater.

by Anonymousreply 1June 30, 2024 9:53 PM

Probably that Curt Schilling. He couldn’t wait to begin defecating on his goodwill when on the baseball Diamond. Now he’s poised to use blindfolded Lady Justice’s scale as a toilet bowl!

by Anonymousreply 2June 30, 2024 9:58 PM

Source?

by Anonymousreply 3June 30, 2024 10:00 PM

As I anticipated, Trump, after being burned by so many of his first term judicial appointees, will no longer rely on the Federalist Society for future nominees. This explains why we haven't seen many nominations announced. And if only those attorneys who have an established history of craven support for Trump are now eligible, we might see enough republicans senators balk at confirmation for lifetime positions.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4May 30, 2025 5:38 PM

Law, as a profession, self-selects people who have some kind of respect for it.

by Anonymousreply 5May 30, 2025 5:52 PM

That Judge Ho will never be on the Supreme Court. He just fucked himself with that opinion he published last week saying that it’s not up to the judiciary to provide oversight to the executive - when that’s exactly the job of the judiciary. He’ll never get through a hearing on that.

If the Democrats take the Senate next year - not likely but anything is possible - if they dare have a hearing on any Trump nominee, fuck them. If they have the majority, there should be no SCOTUS confirmation hearings until after the 2028 election. The rules are, according to the MAGA party: there are no rules! And Trump has already appointed enough nominees.

Also, Trump is obviously desperately trying to prove his worth to the party with this announcement. While at the same time, he and Stephen Miller are criticising Leonard Leo for all of Trump’s judicial picks in his first term - who it turns out, support the Constitution and not a king!

by Anonymousreply 6May 30, 2025 6:01 PM

[quote]Trump leaks panel list of Supreme Curt Justices ready for the Supreme Court

If they're already Supreme "Curt" Justices, I'm pretty sure he can't appoint them twice.

Double, "oh, dear."

by Anonymousreply 7May 30, 2025 6:05 PM

Fuck! I was promised the job.

by Anonymousreply 8May 30, 2025 6:06 PM

I think he leaks these lists so that they people on them can Venmo payments directly to him asap

by Anonymousreply 9May 30, 2025 6:12 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10May 30, 2025 7:17 PM

Trump is now calling Leo a “scumbag.”

by Anonymousreply 11May 30, 2025 8:28 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!