Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

‘A paedophile’s playground’: Inside the scandal at King Charles’s old school

A damning inquiry found that Gordonstoun – where the King is now a patron – enabled the sexual abuse of its pupils for decades.

A damning inquiry found that Gordonstoun – where the King is now a patron – enabled the sexual abuse of its pupils for decades

In the space of two months, May followed by June, Gordonstoun, a boarding school set in 150 acres of stately grandeur in the far north of Scotland on the Moray Firth to the east of Inverness, found itself managing two seismic pieces of news: the first bringing profound pride, the second deep shame and regret. The first was news of a high royal honour from the King, a much-needed patronage as it would turn out.

The second, which came last week, was borne of the confirmation of catastrophic historical failings in safeguarding dating back to the 1960s which left children over a 25-year period with the scars of sexual, physical and emotional abuse. Many have never recovered. Some staff members were paedophiles. There was so little safeguarding until at least 1990 that, in turn, older pupils became abusers too, grooming girls and boys in the years below them. The timing for the Palace is little short of disastrous.

Towards the end of May, to mark the first anniversary of his coronation, King Charles, Gordonstoun’s most famous and prestigious living old boy (1962-67), announced that he was to become the school’s patron. He was following in the footsteps of his father, the late Prince Philip, who had thrived at the eccentric and spartan school – cold showers, morning runs, a medical regime so broad brush that children in King Charles’s era joked they were given dog worming tablets for anything “internal”.

The Duke of Edinburgh had joined in 1934 (then Prince Philip of Greece), among the first wave of pupils under the eccentric German founder Kurt Hahn, who had fled the Nazis, and who believed in the collective good of society rather than the needs of the individual. Hahn later remarked on Prince Philip’s “undefeatable spirit” (He left in 1939, just eight years before his engagement to HRH Princess Elizabeth). His royal portrait in the dining hall has watched over generations of boys eating their porridge, including his three sons.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21June 28, 2024 10:30 PM

Sussex Squad must be foaming at the mouth with plastered rictus grins on their faces while furiously masturbating with one hand and rapidly typing hate about Charles online with the other.

by Anonymousreply 1June 25, 2024 11:48 PM

Were any of the teachers hot?

by Anonymousreply 2June 25, 2024 11:51 PM

Why is he patron? I thought he hated the place.

by Anonymousreply 3June 25, 2024 11:57 PM

Was he a patron? The posted text wasn't clear.

Was he a patron? The posted text wasn't clear.

by Anonymousreply 4June 26, 2024 12:12 AM

Gee, was this a boys' boarding school? Exclusive and isolated and with a bunch of men as unquestioned authorities? AND a pedophiles playground?

Well, no shit, Sherlock!

by Anonymousreply 5June 26, 2024 1:15 AM

I was molested.

by Anonymousreply 6June 26, 2024 2:37 AM

R1 is probably masturbating to pictures of Trump

by Anonymousreply 7June 26, 2024 2:47 AM

ALL of these places were pedophile playgrounds. Every school, every institution.

by Anonymousreply 8June 26, 2024 4:36 AM

R8 - well, I think most boys boarding schools have had scandals. Lots of DL activity as well. These kids are shipped off when they're like 8 years old sometimes.

It's really amazing how much stuff was just never discussed - sexual abuse, physical abuse, homosexuality, woman's sexual pleasure - all considered indecent and allows people to suffer.

by Anonymousreply 9June 26, 2024 5:01 AM

Roald Dahl, the author of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and many other children's books, was sent to boarding schools in England at age 5 or 6. I read something he wrote about his life there and I was appalled. The physical abuse was so sexualized I wonder if what he wrote would be banned in some places. The same with what Charles Spencer divulged about his time in boarding school. Professional Doms would learn some new tricks. And if that sort of behavior was allowed to go on from those in charge of the children of the very top level of British society, imagine what went on in orphanages and schools for indigenous children worldwide.

by Anonymousreply 10June 28, 2024 7:10 AM

UK here,

Everyone I have known who was sent to boarding school was traumatised by it even if they were not abused. The feeling of being rejected by their parents lasted into adulthood. Unfortunately these places have always seemed to attract warped people as staff, and their activities were unchecked or dismissed by the school authorities.

One guy I knew ran away from a school in Scotland because of the bullying. He had to sit his exams for university at a further education college. His parents could barely speak to him they were so angry.

Another guy I knew was abused at a famous public school in England. He felt he couldn’t complain as his parents had paid so much money for his education, and he just had to endure the abuse until he left. He was a very unhappy man years later.

by Anonymousreply 11June 28, 2024 7:31 AM

Don’t all British public schools engage in this? We’ve been hearing about it for years.

by Anonymousreply 12June 28, 2024 7:39 AM

The headline of this thread should only ever be applied to Neverland, Michael Jackson owns this title.

by Anonymousreply 13June 28, 2024 8:57 AM

[quote]The timing for the Palace is little short of disastrous.

The Telegraph is ridiculous. There's no way this can be blamed on the king.

by Anonymousreply 14June 28, 2024 9:30 AM

Don't pretty much all boarding schools have/had this kind of stuff going on?

by Anonymousreply 15June 28, 2024 11:18 AM

what a shithole country

by Anonymousreply 16June 28, 2024 1:02 PM

^ R16,

Your prejudice is showing. Only 0.7% of children in the UK go to boarding schools.

by Anonymousreply 17June 28, 2024 8:57 PM

Yes, but more than 0.7% of those kids go on to run the government.

by Anonymousreply 18June 28, 2024 9:50 PM

Is it too late to apply?

by Anonymousreply 19June 28, 2024 9:52 PM

^

The soon to be ousted government, certainly.

by Anonymousreply 20June 28, 2024 10:00 PM

[quote] Was he a patron? The posted text wasn't clear.

[quote] Was he a patron? The posted text wasn't clear.

A thought so nice, you posted it twice!

by Anonymousreply 21June 28, 2024 10:30 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!