Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

So I just watched Dune 2...

I decided to wait until it was available to stream. Oh my god it's awful! Dull, boring, and stupid. You know who simply can't act and certainly isn't believable as the messiah. This is what people want to see in 2024?

by Anonymousreply 50July 19, 2024 2:02 PM

I still haven't seen it because I find the millenial actors all ugly.

by Anonymousreply 1May 27, 2024 12:07 AM

I hope you didn't have to pay extra for it OP.

by Anonymousreply 2May 27, 2024 12:10 AM

To be fair, the first Dune was just as god awful. Who ever said "Let's remake this pile of shit." should have their dick cut off.

by Anonymousreply 3May 27, 2024 12:12 AM

Yes it is quote turgid. There are several things wrong with it, I cited Chalamet’s performance as a fundamental weakness.

But mostly I think it’s due to Denis Villeneuve’s visual style and the kind of films he makes. He makes very autistic science fiction films. This worked wonderfully for Arrival, it worked wonderfully for Blade Runner 2049, but it does not work for Dune.

Dune needed to feel

A) alien

B) fun

Where is the fun? There’s a great AI fake trailer for Dune as a 1950s epic. This is the movie I want to see.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4May 27, 2024 12:18 AM

[quote] He makes very autistic science fiction films.

As an autistic person, what are the characteristics of an autistic science fiction film?

by Anonymousreply 5May 27, 2024 12:21 AM

R5 I would define it as being propelled by a profound sense of isolation

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6May 27, 2024 12:32 AM

Ad Astra would be another good example

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7May 27, 2024 12:36 AM

Or Gattaca

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8May 27, 2024 12:40 AM

Chalamet and Zendaya were zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz but Austin Butler was fun......

by Anonymousreply 9May 27, 2024 12:46 AM

Lynch’s Dune is not a good movie but it does feel alien bc and it does try to have fun

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10May 27, 2024 12:52 AM

Timmy is too scrawny with bad posture to be believable as a warrior. Plus he mumbles a lot.

by Anonymousreply 11May 27, 2024 12:54 AM

Of course you hated it, OP. It's DL, where not film is liked except " Brokeback Mountain." It's also your chance to summon the Chalamet haters, guaranteeing responses for your thread.

by Anonymousreply 12May 27, 2024 1:44 AM

R1, you mean Zoomers?

by Anonymousreply 13May 27, 2024 3:38 AM

Who's skinnier, Timothee or Zendaya? A tie?

by Anonymousreply 14May 27, 2024 3:41 AM

We don't start sentences with "So."

by Anonymousreply 15May 27, 2024 3:42 AM

Those two better not ever have sex, they'd break each others skinny bones.

by Anonymousreply 16May 27, 2024 3:45 AM

So….

by Anonymousreply 17May 27, 2024 3:56 AM

It was beautiful, but so so boring. There was very little tension in the film. Big moments like Paul riding the worm and the battle with the Emperor's troops were just ho-hum. I also don't recall them ever explaining why the spice was so important.

by Anonymousreply 18May 27, 2024 8:58 PM

The spice is life.

by Anonymousreply 19May 27, 2024 9:05 PM

Dune was never meant to be made into a film. Anyone who tries will fail miserably.

I suppose someone could try anime, but honestly, Dune is a book that was written to play in your head.

by Anonymousreply 20May 27, 2024 9:20 PM

R18 one of the most confounding failures of Villeneuve’s Dune is that it never demonstrates why the spice is needed

The spice is needed because it is used to mutate the Navigators to achieve precognition. That is the only way they can navigate through space. This is never shown! It’s like they were embarrassed y the source material.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21May 27, 2024 9:21 PM

But, does this version have this iconic line?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 22May 27, 2024 9:23 PM

No, R22.

by Anonymousreply 23May 27, 2024 9:24 PM

[quote] To be fair, the first Dune was just as god awful. Who ever said "Let's remake this pile of shit." should have their dick cut off.

It was an extremely respected series of novels long before the first movie.

by Anonymousreply 24May 27, 2024 9:24 PM

They never birthed Paul’s sister in this version. She speaks from the womb.

by Anonymousreply 25May 27, 2024 9:25 PM

This was NEVER shown! That’s the point of the whole movie! They never fired Chekhov’s gun!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26May 27, 2024 9:25 PM

Chekhov never shot his load!

by Anonymousreply 27May 27, 2024 9:29 PM

[quote]but Austin Butler was fun......

He was definitely entertainingly creepy - and he leered at Paul like he'd rather hate fuck him than kill him. But overall, the whole thing was just....yawn. I like Rebeca Ferguson - she gives Charlotte Rampling a run for her money in the cold bitch department and I actually liked the plucky Zendaya, but Paul was just...meh. Maybe it's because I'm not a big fan of Timmy (I thought he was the weak link in Little Women, too), but he just didn't have the charisma - or the whatever - to make you believe these hardcore people would follow him. Just too wispy maybe...

by Anonymousreply 28June 25, 2024 10:43 PM

Agreed, OP.

Ponderous, ugly where it needs to be grand, and presenting a soil grub as a mythic figure.

I prefer my garbage honest.

by Anonymousreply 29June 25, 2024 10:49 PM

Spice up your life!

by Anonymousreply 30June 25, 2024 10:52 PM

You're supposed to have seen it in IMAX, OP. It's not made to be viewed on a 65 inch screen while you fuck around on your phone. It's pure spectacle, like the Avatar movies. I saw it in IMAX and while I have problems with the length, Timmy's acting choices and the story in general, it looked cool as hell.

by Anonymousreply 31June 25, 2024 10:55 PM

[Quote] The spice is needed because it is used to mutate the Navigators to achieve precognition.

But there are no navigators shown in the movie. It seems there was a conscious decision to excise most of the sci fi elements from this sci fi story.

I guess that’s because Villeneuve decided it would trivialize the heavy portentous drama of the story. I was amazed that the weirding way was also omitted, as it was essential to the fremen ability to defeat the emperors forces in battle.

I actually quite like the movies, although I wish they included the navigators, weirding way and other sci fi. They’re not for people who need instant gratification however, and in our digital age, that means many of us. The pace is very slow.

by Anonymousreply 32June 25, 2024 10:55 PM

[quote] As an autistic person, what are the characteristics of an autistic science fiction film?

Think M Night Shyamalan films.

by Anonymousreply 33June 25, 2024 10:57 PM

[quote]It's pure spectacle, like the Avatar movies. I saw it in IMAX and while I have problems with the length, Timmy's acting choices and the story in general, it looked cool as hell.

True, but it should enhance the movie, rather than hold up the movie. I'm sure the scene in Lawrence of Arabia when they arrive to cheers at Aqaba is amazing, particularly with the film score blasting, but it's also impressive on a typical HDTV.

by Anonymousreply 34June 26, 2024 9:07 AM

Movies are entertaining for different reasons. Dune 2 leans very heavily on visuals so it is best enjoyed in a theater. OP didn't experience Dune 2 in a theater so he didn't get the best experience possible. He's entitled to his opinion but I think the venue should be taken into consideration when we assess his opinion. Imagine if I hated Lawrence of Arabia after watching it on a grimy 10 inch screen during a daytime flight.

by Anonymousreply 35June 26, 2024 9:35 AM

Wow the actress from 50s at R4 was actually beautiful.

by Anonymousreply 36June 26, 2024 10:34 AM

Except for a few spots, Dune 2 was incredibly boring. It was like a series of vignettes that barely told a cohesive story. Big moments, like riding the worm and defeating the emperor's troops was given a perfunctory treatment.

by Anonymousreply 37June 26, 2024 2:00 PM

Won't watch a film I can't see.

by Anonymousreply 38June 26, 2024 2:31 PM

The book is shit too.

by Anonymousreply 39June 26, 2024 2:35 PM

I saw it on Imax at Waterloo, London (one of the biggest screens in the world), at the back which is the best viewing position for a screen that huge. I was totally blown away by it. But then I'm autistic so maybe it was designed to appeal to my senses. I can't imagine it would be any good on TV.

by Anonymousreply 40June 26, 2024 2:36 PM

It doesn’t do anything visually or thematically that Lawrence of Arabia didn’t do already. A big screen isn’t going to save this turd.

by Anonymousreply 41July 18, 2024 8:34 PM

I fast-forwarded to the Feyd--Paul fight because I dislike Science Fiction but like Austin.

Even my fandom couldn't save this segment for me. Bleagh! Boring as all get-out! Ugly coloration. Dull script. Little characterization, Austin's standard "I tried to understand the character and decided he was the hero of his story" PR blather notwithstanding.

Plus, Austin's choice of voice here was AWFUL. I guess that was good, because he hardly had any dialogue (same with "The Bikeriders," but I digress)!

But the most ridiculous aspect---and successful fiction must have internal logic---is that Feyd-Rautha is shown as a virtual killing machine, cold-eyed and cold-blooded (his entire head, from bald pate to black teeth, is meant to evoke the Black Mamba snake), yet is vanquished and quite quickly by the smaller and slighter Paul Atreides, of whom (I don't think; correct me if I'm wrong) we see no similar knife-fighting history.

Yeah, no.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42July 18, 2024 9:16 PM

R42, may thy knife chip and shatter.

by Anonymousreply 43July 19, 2024 4:05 AM

The Dune films are The Emperor’s New Clothes of cinema.

by Anonymousreply 44July 19, 2024 4:36 AM

"May thy knife chip and shatter"! It's dialogue you can hear being uttered by Niles Crane!

by Anonymousreply 45July 19, 2024 4:36 AM

[quote] Dune needed to feel A) alien B) fun

I don't think the film 'bros' who wet themselves over these kinds of "films" (as if it's THE standard of cinema) want that. They want all their ridiculous shit to be 'prestige' film that's respected. Fun for the sake of fun is not their thing.

by Anonymousreply 46July 19, 2024 5:50 AM

All this hate for Tim is having an effect on him.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 47July 19, 2024 12:55 PM

It’s not awful. It’s a very solid film.

The only complaint I had about it is the fear the moviemakers had of the sci fi elements of the story. I guess they thought it would make it seem silly?

So no navigators, no weirding way. Oh well. Still liked it.

by Anonymousreply 48July 19, 2024 12:59 PM

No navigators, no explanation for why spice even matters.

by Anonymousreply 49July 19, 2024 1:10 PM

OP is the “mouseboy” poster.

by Anonymousreply 50July 19, 2024 2:02 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!