Los Angeles Innocence Project takes up Scott Peterson's Murder Case

WTF?!

Is Momma on the board of the Innocence Project now?

The Innocence Project was co-founded by Barry Scheck, one of O.J.’s “dream team” lawyers, so why is this a surprise?

I’m innocent! Bitch deserved it! Stupid frau!

Waiting for Ben Affleck to play Scott Peterson in a biopic.

He basically already did in "Gone, Girl"

The ""LA Innocence Project" has nothing to do with the Innocence Project.

Nada.

Zero.

Zilch.

The entire thing is a stunt to make the Innocence Project look bad.

It's working, of course.

Omg r7, thank you for the clarification, I was utterly horrified to read this thread. If there is anyone who does not deserve free lawyers, it’s this convicted double murderer.

I do think Scott Peterson killed his wife.

However, I've watched several true crime shows about the trial. Not much evidence, really. IIRC, the boat didn't contain any evidence that Laci had been in the boat (before she was dumped into the ocean).

I think Scott Peterson's sister-in-law (wife of his brother) has been heavily advocating for him to get out of jail.

I think she's in love with Scott.

The Innocence Project is a scam. They’re revolting.

R7, Not true. Barry Scheck of the Innocence Project N.Y. has fully endorsed the L.A. Innocence Project, which is part of the “Innocence Network.”

[quote]“The collaboration between the Los Angeles Innocence Project and Cal State LA’s California Forensic Science Institute is like no other in the country,” said Barry Scheck, who co-founded the New York-based national Innocence Project. “I hope it will serve as a model for future collaborations between innocence organizations and scientists, because it will not only impact our ability to uncover cases where faulty forensics were responsible for wrongly convicting people in the past, it will help improve our ability to accurately assess and scrutinize the reliability of forensic evidence used in courtrooms today.”

Cal State LA is [italic]the[/italic] teacher-churning factory of Southern California.

R9 There is enough evidence. I read the transcripts of the trial.

I remember the days when Larry King would cover the Scott Peterson trial every night. There was lots of drama between the guests: Nancy Grace, Kimberly Guilfoyle (then Newsom), pretty boy defense attorney Chris Pixley, Mark Geragos, etc.

Nothing good ever happens in Modesto!

Anybody who thinks he's innocent is a completely mentally deficient person, devoid of logical and probable reason, means, capabilities and motives, given the evidence.

It's all there. Fucking, duh. Why is this even still a question? He didn't want her or a baby, wanted the hot, new young thing, lied to all of them about it. And kept it up during the ruse of trying to find her.

She died and wound up in the bay after he went fishing after a a week or so. Their bodies bobbed to the surface because of the gas of decomposition. Otherwise they would have never been found.

It's not some complicated mystery on a Nightline show. It's pretty fucking obvious.

Next up, Chris Watts.

Good luck with that.

^^ Mama’s mussy knows that his confession was FALSE and COERCED.

If he wasn't a good-looking white guy no one would pay him any attention.

Too bad they couldn't get that cutie Richard Ramirez out of prison before he died.

Didn't he get fat in prison?

He sure has a nice fat ass.

Not this motherfucker again!

I suggest Scott Peterson and Christ Watts start an Onlyfans account to do content together. They’d make a shit ton of money.

[quote]Nothing good ever happens in Molesto!

Fixed it for you, r15.

Nothing says innocents like dying your hair blond and getting caught just before crossing the Mexican boarder.

I'd forgotten he was moved off death row.

R27 Is the Mexican boarder hot though? I’d kill my hair too in order to take away his innocents!

[quote] Nothing says innocents like dying your hair blond and getting caught just before crossing the Mexican boarder.

[quote] [R27] Is the Mexican boarder hot though? I’d kill my hair too in order to take away his innocents!

Shit, you guys -- It's "innocence," not innocents.

And "border," not "boarder"! A boarder is someone who rents a room in your house.

Get it together.

All the intelligent eldergays of DL have died off. There are more younger dlers than we thought.

Innocents, R27?

Oh, deazzzzzzzzzzz

Thanks to R27, my innocents has dyed.

I don't trust the "innocence project". As mentioned upthread, Barry Scheck is involved in it, and I believe some iteration of it was always pulling for guilty motherfucker Adnan Syed to get out. They probably also cape for Steven Avery.

And HBO and co. help by letting them produce propaganda series for their clients.

Wait just a minute...I was calling for an obviously guilty innocent murderer to be released from prison first!

r36 I didn't know Rosie was transitioning.

Who cares if this guy is innocent. He's white.

Into WHAT, R37?

The Scott/Lacey Peterson saga was DL at it's finest. Those threads were great. I can't decide if my favorite defense was, Not guilty by reason of being hot or Not guilty because no hot guy should be stuck with a frau or the people who actually were taking it all seriously.

[quote]Lacey Peterson

Oh, dear.

Scott Peterson is guilty, guilty, GUILTY. No question about it.

I like the Innocence Project and what they do. I have no idea why they have any interest in this guilty murderer.

Look, mama, these for you!

Even Sandra Bullock knows Scott was guilty

Like all reasonable Dataloungers, I will need a current photo of Scott, preferably full body, to determine his guilt or innocence.

R6 Have you ever seen the film? I don’t want to ruin the plot but I’m guessing you haven’t.

You know was it ever confirmed HOW she was killed. Like what trauma did he exert on her. I know he killed her. I just never remember how.

Yeah I have always been torn on this. He clearly killed her but we don't even know how, with that in mind, it's hard to impose the death penalty. Also, those two asshole "stealth" jurors were so clearly there with an agenda. I was shocked it wasn't a mistrial. His weird ass sis in law is in love with him though, another Rabia/Adnan type thing.

The timeline makes me a bit uncomfortable.

I don't support the death penalty. Life in prison, no parole, that'll do.

I fully support the death penalty. Hang him high.

At least he got rid of that child support problem.

I support the Innocence Project but they're off their rockers with Scott fucking Peterson.

Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. In this case, the usual Datalounge Guilt/Innocence Evaluation Process does not apply because he's just hugely fucking guilty.

He was kind of cute 20 years ago.

INNOCENT!

There have to be dozens of people more worthy of support from the Innocence Project than Scott Peterson.

Which one of you bitches is my mother, er, works for the LA Innocence Project and thinks he's innocent because he's hot.

This is disgusting. There is no new evidence that would justify this.

R55, I'm sorry but in this case you have been overruled.

In the case of slimy Scott Peterson:

GUILTY.

R55, After meeting Scott for the first time, Laci’s mother told Laci that Scott had a nice ass.

But R59 she also said it couldn't live forever..

Eww, R59, whose Mother does that? Never mind, it's tacky and still no excuse for Scott murdering his preggo wife.

Here's what I think happened. She found out he was having an affair. They argued heatedly. Maybe she hit him and he hit her. Or pushed her. She fell and banged her head and died. I do not think he ever intended to kill her. But he did. So he panicked and he wrapped her up and threw her in the ocean, concocting a story about how she must have been kidnapped. Where he lost sympathy...if he ever had any, is when first the public finds out about his affair, and second, that he was on his way to Mexico with money, dyed hair and a fake beard, and an ill thought out escape plan. Maybe he doesn't deserve to be on death row, but he should definitely be in prison.

I walked so sexy Scotty could run!

R62 you forgot the 12 Viagra tablets he was carrying!

If all the wives who "accidentally" died from falls in the bath, falls down the stairs, falls that hit table corners, etc etc, were real, there would be more room in our prisons and fewer insurance payouts to the grieving husbands and their girlfriends.

[quote]I do not think he ever intended to kill her.

No one who spends any time on DL could possibly be this naive.

J'accuse.

Am I the only one who kept getting Scott and Laci Peterson mixed up with Drew and Stacey Peterson?

R65 try telling that to the police!

I think the innocence project made this decision, because like the rest of us, they also found Laci an annoying chick who married a man who was too hot for her.

[quote]Waiting for Ben Affleck to play Scott Peterson in a biopic.

Already done, by Dean Cain.

The Innocence Project sux anyway. They use very young inexperienced attorneys who are ineffective. I remember them trying to help Steven Avery. It was an embarrassment.

There's also a "Free the Menendez brothers!" movement

Barf

What am I, chopped liver?

Any confirmation about what Scott's cock was like?

R70 I thought he did a great job. Good movie re creation.

Middle aged and elder gays, how exactly did she die? Did he beat or shoot her? They never quite figured out cause of death right.

R16 But Scott’s DNA wasn’t on the algae found on the bodies nor did Amber Fry have an alibi when the bodies were found.

[quote]R62 Maybe she hit him and he hit her. Or pushed her. She fell and banged her head and died. I do not think he ever intended to kill her. But he did. So he panicked and he wrapped her up and threw her in the ocean, concocting a story about how she must have been kidnapped.

Doubt an 8-months pregnant woman who was only 5 feet tall would attempt to hit her rather large husband. And if he hit or pushed her and she banged her head, then he should have taken her to the hospital or called for help. He was too prepared with his secret boat and secretly made anchors for his actions (of taking her to the ocean) to have been panicked, spur-of-the-moment behavior.

Was Laci Peterson Latina or black adjacent?

[quote]Doubt an 8-months pregnant woman who was only 5 feet tall would attempt to hit her rather large husband.

Wrong. Women are constantly hitting men.

Any deets on the pinga? One of the women he was knocking off must have blabbed..

R81, Didn’t Scott and Amber fuck on their first date?

R82 I wouldn't put it past that horndog

Is fucking on the first date, bad?

R82 Yeah I think they did.

R78 Right? Yeah he planned this. Didn't he tell Amber his wife was dead? I don't think he should have gotten the death penalty. I don't even know if he should have been convicted, but come on, of course he fucking did it! And the Innocence Project is shit.

R85 Oh yeah. I memba that. A big part of why the fam, law enforcement turned on Scott is because he told Amber his wife was dead before she disappeared on Christmas Eve. He did this shit.

r80 = Johnny Depp

Scott Peterson appeared virtually in court today, seeking a new trial.

i belive R-30 is the gramer knot- see,mind your own speling bitch!, i just cant take it anymore and im so knew two data longe,oh now ill never get home,,,

Just let Scott out and see what he does-everyone will be recording him.

This dumb asshole, right here, is why he's getting a new trial, and it's about time. I guess you really can't take people with fucking pink hair seriously. I remember watching her and that other stealth juror taunting him after the verdict. I was dumbfounded that Mark Geragos didn't do something about it sooner. I think he is guilty and am pretty sure he'll be convicted again, but this was unacceptable.

[quote] The ""LA Innocence Project" has nothing to do with the Innocence Project.

Wrong. It’s part of the Innocence Network, which is owned by the Innocence Project. The Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck has also spoken out in support of the LA chapter.

Wasn't one of the jurors removed as they'd been flirting with him? Or was that done other hot killer?

R93, She was mouthing off to the media outside the courthouse about his guilt while the trial was still in progress.

"How DARE a man be considered potentially innocent!!!"

Not sure who you're talking to R95. I said that I think he's guilty but the fact that cunt juror was allowed through was a travesty and that he deserves a new trial because of that. I can't believe this wasn't overturned years ago. I hope he's still found guilty but if not, that chick and the mouthy guy can blame themselves.

He will be freed and immediately sign on as a Trumper if he hasn't already-perhaps VP choice?

R88, What you cannot see in the pic at R88 is he’s got his hair pulled back in a fairly lengthy ponytail.

The judge gave him the option yesterday to appear in person at future court proceedings or appear via Zoom.

Scott responded that Zoom was fine.

No this was a female juror who was removed as she'd been flirting with the defendant

He's an innocent murderer with a big luscious cock-Let my people go.

R98 A ponytail? Ugh. His prison midlife crisis.

Just checking back. Any Scott Peterson dick-pics yet?

Good luck Scott-Will send the prison my Stats/Contact info.

Ponytail? Whats next man bun?

[quote][R98] A ponytail? Ugh. His prison midlife crisis

That or he's someone's bitch who enjoys having something to pull while he's servicing him.

[quote] said that I think he's guilty but the fact that cunt juror was allowed through was a travesty and that he deserves a new trial because of that.

No, he does not. That’s not how it works and there will be no new trial.

I'll bet he misses fishing.

Sounds like he is asking for a new trial and that the lower (trial) court is entertaining his request.

I thought that his sister-in-law (wife of his half-brother) was in love with Scott, but now I'm sure.

She actually went to law school and became an attorney ... in order to help Scott!

R106 Yes, he does. Verdicts get overturned because of this kind of crap. Maybe not all the time, but they do. This is a high profile case and a death penalty one at that. I can think of one off the top of my head; Ryan Widmer, his verdict was overturned when they found out jurors were doing experiments about the timeline at home. This is why you have to dot your i's and cross your t's when you try a case like this. I think Geragos was his attorney, I can't believe he never brought this up before.

[quote]R86 Oh yeah. I memba that.

Off to post in this thread: