Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why do publications publish a celebrity’s age after their names in articles?

Does anyone else find this odd?

by Anonymousreply 19December 4, 2023 1:14 PM

Yes, OP (72)

by Anonymousreply 1December 4, 2023 12:09 AM

Adding the age of the person mentioned in a story was pretty standard for newspaper articles in general, OP

by Anonymousreply 2December 4, 2023 12:28 AM

It makes no sense. Why not add race, income, height, political party?

by Anonymousreply 3December 4, 2023 12:31 AM

No, oP

by Anonymousreply 4December 4, 2023 12:31 AM

In the earlier parts of the 20th century mentioning race or ethnicity was also a pretty standard journalistic practice R3 / OP.

Have you never read old newspaper articles?

by Anonymousreply 5December 4, 2023 12:45 AM

Yes I find it very weird.

by Anonymousreply 6December 4, 2023 1:05 AM

Yes

by Anonymousreply 7December 4, 2023 1:06 AM

It is required by the NYT in-house style book.

by Anonymousreply 8December 4, 2023 1:23 AM

Which is run by the Sulzbergers (Jewishish)

by Anonymousreply 9December 4, 2023 1:36 AM

The publish the paper, they don’t edit it—you’re a fucking bigoted asshole

by Anonymousreply 10December 4, 2023 1:38 AM

Joy Behar says that People magazine is the one that started putting everyone's age after their names.

by Anonymousreply 11December 4, 2023 3:45 AM

Another gift boomers gave the world. Obsession with youth.

by Anonymousreply 12December 4, 2023 7:11 AM

No not odd at all OP. Completely normal.

by Anonymousreply 13December 4, 2023 7:16 AM

It's even weirder when they don't necessarily include the age, but just refer to a woman as a "a grandmother," even though that has absolutely nothing to do with what is being reported on.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14December 4, 2023 7:31 AM

[quote]Another gift boomers gave the world. Obsession with youth.

That's been going on for millennia.

All ancient civilizations were obsessed with beauty, youth, and immortality.

by Anonymousreply 15December 4, 2023 7:34 AM

[quote] It makes no sense. Why not add race, income, height, political party?

And sizemeat verificatia for all adult males.

by Anonymousreply 16December 4, 2023 7:48 AM

Newspapers do it in many news stories. If you, say, witness a crime, it becomes “Nate Smith, 34, watched as the vehicle made a getaway.”

What does the witness’s age have to do with anything?

Or when, in the crime blotter, it says, “Marge Johnson, 51, was charged with making an illegal right turn.” How does the age help clarify the crime?

by Anonymousreply 17December 4, 2023 10:45 AM

It's so we can find out the true ages of people like Joan Collins, by going back in the archive.

But yes, it's weird and always has been.

by Anonymousreply 18December 4, 2023 10:55 AM

[quote]Joy Behar says that People magazine is the one that started putting everyone's age after their names.

Joy has never been accused of being correct or ever doing a bit of research before she opens her trap.

Television news does the same thing - " 31 yr old Mary Waters was the victim of........"

by Anonymousreply 19December 4, 2023 1:14 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!