[quote]R148/PC: As for the Bible, I believe "gay Christian" is an oxymoron. I have real contempt for such people.
I have real contempt for gay fascists.
[quote]Leviticus clearly sentences homosexuals to death.
No, it does not. The word 'homosexual' does not occur there.
[quote]Every version of the Bible I've ever read says the sin of Sodom was homosexuality.
I've no idea to which versions you're appealing, but all the versions I know have this to say:
"Now this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed, and complacent; they did not help the poor and needy. Thus they were haughty and committed abominations before Me. Therefore I removed them, as you have seen (Ezekiel 16:49-50).
'Sins' and 'abominations' are not interchangeable concepts, but come from two entirely different religious paradigms. In the Jewish testament, "sins" were offenses for which one could simply make a sin offering to make it go away. Note that the passages which speak of 'abomination' do not use the term 'sin' at all. 'Abomination' (Hebrew 'tō-w-‘ê-ḇāh') referred to a ritual or ceremonial infraction or taboo (typically used of idolatry, but also of breaking the dietary restrictions - Deut.14:3), pertaining to one's membership in the community; one's standing as an observant Jew. 'Abomination' was characterized as being something characteristically committed by the 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 (i.e. gentiles, cf. Lev.18:24-29). Matters of ritual impurity were handled in various ways, depending on their severity. Some, like menstruation or handling a dead body, required a period of sequestration ('seven days,' or 'until evening,' respectively). Those characterized as 'abomination' - idolatry, blasphemy, dishonor of family or elders, violation of the dietary laws, breaking the Sabbath, etc. - mandated death; being "cut off from your people" was a euphemism for execution.
Christianity was totally different. Christians often completely misunderstand what they read in the Jewish Testament, coming at it as they do with Christian concepts of sin and the way it's expiated in Christianity (contrition, confession, penance, asking Christ for forgiveness). The majority of offenses characterized as 'abomination' typically do not rise to the level of what Christians would characterize as a sin (eating pork, wearing mixed fabrics, etc.). But when they read Jewish texts calling for the death penalty for such offenses, they conflate it with the Christian concept of sin (cf. Romans 6:23).
[quote]PD, why are you trying to sanitize the Bible? It's homophobic bullcrap. You actually deny that the Bible is homophobic?
I'm simply offering the facts. The bible does not discuss "homosexuality," since both the word and the concept of sexual orientation were only coined in the 19th century. They are anachronistic for the bible. But in the wake of WWII, there had developed a dawning awareness of gays as a social movement. Evangelicals lost their minds, and the more visible gays became, the more they wanted a bible that would more expressly condemn them. So in 1946, the new edition of the RSV became the first bible to include the word, dishonestly foisted onto the text.
Mid-20th-century evangelicals were not the first to tamper with the wording of the bible in order to condemn homosexuals. Expositors from the Middle Ages introduced words like "sodomite" into the texts ."Sodomite" isn't even a biblical word, but rather a term dishonestly introduced into the 1611 KJV by its translators, attempting to link the word 𝑞ā-ḏêš (literally 'holy one' [male]) in passages like Deuteronomy 23:17 and 1 Kings 14:24, with the story of Sodom in Genesis 19. There's no textual basis for doing so.
Pointing any of that out does not "sanitize" the bible; it's still a collection of atavistic ideas from the late Iron Age/early Common Era which no one today has any business making the basis of their morality.