Is sex with a 17-yr. old football player "rape"?

She’s a predator. Sick fuck. She took advantage of her power and a young boy’s raging hormones. What happens if she gets knocked up? His life is ruined.

In this case, yes, it is wrong. However, a consensual and passionate romance between a 17 year old water polo player and his debonair neighbour is perfectly acceptable.

How is his life ruined, R1? I agree that she is a predator and the issue of a potential pregnancy or STD is a real one. She is an adult who can better asses the consequences of her actions. She is also the party who is entitled to make a choice if sex results in an unintended pregnancy. He is a 17 year-old still learning that actions have consequences. This is not a trivial wrongdoing.

But it didn’t result in a pregnancy or an STD (that we know of) and his life isn’t ruined.

His mom has raised him to eat Asian pussy and this white pussy ruined him for that!

Imagine the shame of being assaulted outside a Pizza Hut, of all places.

Can't rape the willing!

[quote] She is an adult who can better asses

She can get better asses. I agree.

[Quote]two alleged assaults

Oh man, that poor kid. Being poked in the taint is bad enough once, but twice...whew.

[quote] The private Christian prep school is about 60 miles northwest of Charleston and has about 300 students from grades PK to 12.

White Christian problems.

She gave him an Immaculate Erection.

A young 27 years old woman raping a 17 years old guy, almost in the peak of virility with record levels of testosterone, cut the crap. You are crazy puritan society.

THAT BITCH! IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ME!

Will her husband stand by her?

[quote] “A trusted coach, teacher and friend that abused our trust and violated her oath as an educator. She has ruined our son's life,"

The mom sounds like a hysterical cunt. What is this oath of which she speaks?

Come to think of it, the mom is probably jealous of the teacher. She’s probably had a Mommy’s CHO for the 17y/o stud ever since he started growing pubes.

Even with his face blocked out, the husband appears to be hot.

"let mama kiss it and make it better."

Doesn’t that apply to most everyone, R15?

Was she named after Ronald Reagan?

A 17-year-old being sexually active, possibly with an older partner, is not surprising from a biological and psychological point of view. Legally, it can be a crime, but this merely a normative question that each society and body of government has to decide on.

Her being a teacher and him being a student, even if he didn't go to her classes, that's where the core of the problem lies to me. She has a duty as an educator to be a responsible role model to those in her care. She has shown a significant lack of judgment and failed as a teacher by placing her own desires over what is good for the kids.

Trust me mom and dad - while it may technically be rape - she didn’t ruin his life. Ask him how much he bragged about it.

Where were these teachers when I was in school?

[quote] She has a duty as an educator

She took an oath!

"but moooom, she did do her doody!"

Oath or oaf?

Damn, at 17 I jacked off 5x a day and could shoot across the room.

Why is a 27 year old teaching there, anyway?

Did they use condoms?

R17, Not at all. He’s obviously young, in shape and masculine appearing.

[quote] How is his life ruined

If she gets knocked up.

[quote] A young 27 years old woman raping a 17 years old guy, almost in the peak of virility with record levels of testosterone, cut the crap. You are crazy puritan society.

You just explained why it’s not okay, dumbass.

When I was 17, I had sex with numerous people - several were in their 20s. I was a slut.

I bet the Mom is really fat, and jealous of this hot, young nymph scoring all that young cock.

Isnt the age of consent 16? He can drive a car, he can ride a bitch.

[quote] Trust me mom and dad - while it may technically be rape - she didn’t ruin his life.

Unless she showed him that his “8 inches” were really just 8 centimeters.

If it was just about fucking and she wasn't stringing him along some kind of weird emotional control/manipulation then I really don't see the problem. The thought that this guy would somehow be hurt or traumatized by the sex is just ridiculous.

R11, do not be hypocritical. If a 27-year-old man had engaged in sexual acts with a 17-year-old girl, especially one that was his pupil, you would be screaming 'RAPE!' from the rooftops. This is about an older person who was in a position of authority in an educational center, taking advantage of it in order to coerce, manipulate or exploit a teenager under their care into engaging in sexual acts with them. This is why this is a crime, because teenagers go to school to receive an academic and social education, not to be taken advantage of by immoral teachers who cannot understand that they are there to educate kids, and have a duty of care over them.

Now, outside of an educational context, if the age of consent is 16, then this wouldn't be a crime. It would be creepy and disgusting (this woman is married with children, so what is she doing chasing teenagers?), but not a violation of any laws.

She looks like a Hallmark character.

NEWS FLASH - she is accused of sexual battery and sexual assualt but not RAPE.

But to answer your STUPID trolling question OP, an adult who fucks a 17yo is committing statutory rape, in some jurisdictions.

That's not rape rape.

R27 if you Google her name with South Carolina and go to images you can pretty quickly find a picture of his face and unblurred.. he's got kind of a goofy looking face and big ears but still cute enough.

I honestly don't probably have what would be considered a healthy view about this. I would never approach or want to be near a 17 year old or even a 20 year old for that matter. But when I was 16 17 I was making out and doing more with guys sometimes twice as old as me and more and I never once thought that they were doing anything wrong by being with me. In a lot of ways they save me and taught me a lot about how to be me. The flip side of it though is that every woman in my family has a baby at 16 and the men are always significantly older and I always found that incredibly disgusting so maybe it's a double standard or I just have a really skewed view on the entire thing.

They shoulda gone to Wendy's.

I really don't consider 16/17 year olds to be little kids? They oversexualize themselves a lot of the time and look like adults. If they can do other "mature" things like driving, knowing not to steal/bully others, then surely they know what they're doing when they decide to have sex.

The word "rape" is tossed around too loosely nowadays. To me, rape is an actual attack or being coerced. Lots of people in their late teens want to get laid, believe it or not, and give consent even if the law says they're too innocent to do so.

Age of consent in most states now is 17 or 16

[quote]I really don't consider 16/17 year olds to be little kids? They oversexualize themselves a lot of the time and look like adults. If they can do other "mature" things like driving, knowing not to steal/bully others, then surely they know what they're doing when they decide to have sex.

With regard to their emotional maturity, they are certainly not comparable to an adult in their late 20s.

Physically, it really depends. Some 17-year-olds still look really young, some are physically much more mature (just look at some high school football players).

R39, There are no unblurred photos of him on Google.

R45, Yes, there are. Her husband is definitely fuckable.

Straight sex, don’t care.

The age of consent in SC is 16, so unless there are other laws regarding an adult in some sort of oversight position (such as a teacher) having sex with a 17 year old I would say it is not rape, nor is it illegal.

She looks like a Mini Boebert

The husband is probably a cuck that ate JockDude's load out of his wife's snatch.

When the boy go up the old cunt, yes. It's rape, without the quotation marks.

R46, not next to the teenage football player with a quarterback build and a perpetual hardon.

Those that are concerned with STDs and pregnancy, by 17 years old, someone should have talked with him about birth control. It was as much his responsibility as the crazy teacher.

I'm guessing she isn't so stupid that she would fuck him without being on the pill. But who knows?

He’s probably thinking about slipping his hard dick inside her pussy and hearing her moan and feeling her vaginal walls gently grip his throbbing cock and he’s saying to himself, “my life is RUINED, because I can’t have that anymore”

How many men did sanctimonious mom sleep with back in the day?

No, she did him a favor.

Go HHA Raiders!

The parents are on the grift. Thats why his life is RUINED and she’s a PREDATOR. They'll be suing the school for sure.

Like R35 wrote. This is a clear case of sexual abuse and "statutory rape." He could not legally consent to such a relationship under the age of 18, because she had "the duty to care for" him.

I mean it's a private school... Maybe they want to have their son graduate with all fees returned?

She's got an attractive husband, but I guess there's no substitute for an eager and indefatigable teenager with energy and a dick that can go multiple times in a session.

Especially if you want it quick and down and dirty.

Absolutely it’s immoral . If she had waited a couple of months , though, it would have been moral. Or if she had done it in England.

A teacher should never cross that line. It may be legal but it is immoral.

[quote] “A trusted coach, teacher and friend that abused our trust and violated her oath as an educator. She has ruined our son's life,"

The only thing that might ruin her son’s life is the world telling him his life is ruined.

If the foto at R57 is current, then by the mom mentioning quarterback in her statement, then the teen would be no.4 in the foto. 4 would be a number for a quarterback and the towel is also a giveaway.

Just my thought.

[quote]A 17-year-old being sexually active, possibly with an older partner, is not surprising from a biological and psychological point of view.

Mrs. Robinson, are you trying to seduce me?

I have no doubt that at 17, I was having sex with guys in their 30s by MY choice. That said, they were NOT my teachers.

R65, the photo was from an article from 2021, so it could be him.

Nevermind, the assault happened this year, so it's nobody on the picture.

R53, a 17 year-old SHOULD be aware of birth control and STD risks, but we don’t hold them to the same standard as adults. That’s why they can’t drink or vote or even drive at night in some states. Their judgement is still developing.

When I was 16-17 I had sex with a lot of people in their 20’s/30’s and wasn’t damaged.

[quote]When I was 16-17 I had sex with a lot of people in their 20’s/30’s and wasn’t damaged.

And yet here you are, posting on DL.

I was molested.

I'd call this whole situation sad for three reasons: 1) this is a Christian school; 2) the only reason the boy's life is "ruined" is because his mother is a karen; 3) [italic]her[/italic] name is "Reagan".

All kidding aside, there is a reason that we have laws on the books everywhere in the US that define the age of majority as 18 (and we should all understand that it's an arbitrary demarcation, but there it is). The teacher, while she didn't take "an oath", did breach the community's trust in violating her ethical requirement as an authority figure. Teachers should not have sex with their students regardless of their age(s)... and hotness. I can't imagine what was going through this 27-year-old teacher's mind when she caused or allowed this to happen (recognizing that she's hot herself so the boy might have come on to her, it's her obligation to say "no" when it progressed beyond "gosh, Mrs. Anderson, you're pretty!"). She's the adult in this relationship and should have acted accordingly.

That said... read the comments (it is Fox noise, so it's chock full of projection, lunacy, excuses, blaming and schadenfreude although nobody who posts there has even an elemental grasp of what that means). The one point someone made is that her treatment despite being arrested is prejudicial as if it were a man found to have banged a 17-year-old cheerleader his bail wouldn't have been a mere $2500, and if it were a male teacher banging the quarterback, he'd be denied bail altogether (this is South Carolina, after all).

I feel bad for her hottie husband and kids. If it turns out she's pregnant, under South Carolina law (as in most states, to my knowledge), the child would be legally the husband's and he's (financially) responsible for it begging a long, drawn-out court/parental battle. Imagine living in a state where you can't get an abortion and your spouse gets knocked up as a result of rape.

Was it one finger or two?

Okay, I was curious (yeah, I know...). So, the only current QB I could find is #14, I think. Here's a picture from 2021-22.

To be honest, he's one of the younger looking ones, so yikes!

None of them are handsome in my opinion.

22 maybe, with a haircut and a couple more years on him.

They’re always married mothers.

Those ass toys are hers, Mom - I swear!

A 17 year old football player can rape me if he wants! I am ready and willing!

The crazy mom is driving all this. The kid's dad is probably high fiving him. But the teacher is insane. They always tell, because they have to brag about the hot pussy they're getting.

I always tell my boys to stick to fucking each other - much less legal hassle and you get to cum all you want!

It's too bad teaching is not a more respected or well paying profession. It's mostly something women go into, and women who don't have the drive and brains for better or more lucrative professions. This is why we continue to hear these stories more and more.

There is an enormous difference between two horny teen PEERS having sex (which, by the way is still not a good idea, but likely unavoidable these days) and a person in a position of authority and power having sex with a minor.

I guess the rape went something like this

The teen's life is probably the least ruined compared to the teacher, husband, and kids.

No one is saying that R82. But most of us having been 17 year old boys know the notion that this kid is damaged by this is BS. Of course she should be charged for abusing her position of trust, but if not for mom, he’d be going back for more.

These little bastards think about pussy 24/7 (if they are straight). I guess he was devastated that a good looking 27 year old wanted to take his loads, I think kid was more than happy and, as other posters mentioned, couldn't keep the secret, cause he had to brag about it to other boys. And anyone who knows high school boys, knows that he is the hero of the day .

I am assuming that the vast majority of us on here were 17 year old boys at one point and understand that in this situation, he's no victim. Plus the cougar/MILF thing is still a big deal.

She just wanted some extra pepperoni.

Her married name is Reagan Anderson Mobley.

Any relation to the Mississippi Mobleys?

Of course, some posters here just seems like elderly puritan fraus. As if they have never been young males, whose only dream is to get laid. With straight boys it is even easier and less traumatic, cause there is no shame or guilt about it as with young closeted gay boys.

Let's not be hypocrites and pretend that it is the same as girl being seduced by an older man or even a gay boy being fucked by an older man. Because you know that society doesn't project shame on active participant in sexual intercourse, as it does on passive one.

And if the boys score a good looking teacher, their stocks go to far heaven. Plus the teacher is very young, she is only 27.

She wanted him because she couldn’t have him. Forbidden fruit is always, ALWAYS, the sweetest fruit of all. I’ll bet he playfully flirted with her and at first she just thought it was cute and funny, but it also sexually excited her and the more she thought about it, the more intense her longing became until she just surrendered and went after his dick.

Now her life is ruined, but now and then we all do impulsive things or let our libido take charge.

R93, Oops, sorry.

“Reagan Mobley Anderson, 27, of Holly Hill, is charged with two counts of sexual battery of a student age 16/17 without coercion.“

I don’t know her.

r76 goodness, they are all so basic looking. Her ass couldn't have just waited a few months to bang that basic looking kid?

[quote]society doesn't project shame on active participant in sexual intercourse, as it does on passive one.

The passive part is also much more likely to experience pain during intercourse, especially if it's the first time (both with vaginal and anal sex). Then you have the risk of pregnancy for females, plus the fact that the passive part is at much greater risk of contracting HIV from the active part than the other way around.

Also, let's not forget that the average female is physically much weaker than the average male.

While this teacher's actions are clearly morally wrong, you really can't compare them to an adult MAN doing the same to a 17-year-old.

Biology comes into play when women need to be “weaker” to get out of a felony or falsely accuse a man, but not when they want to steal a job or some trans insanity.

THIS CUNT IS A PERVERT.

No, R100, it's exactly the same.

When will feminists learn you can’t emasculate men into inert eunuchs and still claim they’re predators too.

What she did was both wrong and a public service.

#4 or #28 at r76 would make her case more comprehensible.

R102 It’s close but not exactly the same

It isn’t rape rape, but is it rape rape rape?

Pussy Pass all over this thread. Are you all straight men or Fraus?

When I was teaching, there was a 25 year old woman who I'm pretty sure was into her students. She insisted on teaching a class for troubled boys, promising to meet their "unique educational needs". She wore tight leggings daily, with a short top, that showed off her gigantic ass. This bitch was a total fraud and we absolutely hated eachother. We both coached volleyball and one day we were carpooling to a game. The bitch admitted ro me that she had the boys on her Snapchat and that one had sent her a snap of him watching porn. Of course she pretended to be outraged, but you just knew she had a thing for these troubled youth. Bitch got pregnant not long after with some unemployed loser. Hope she gets fired one day.

Good to know those “white” academies set up after desegregation are still going strong!

R48 is another typical lazy cunt of the type now infesting the DL, the type that rushes to get a word in and then tries to leave an opening for her incomplete, unhelpful "LOOK AT ME" posting"

SEXUAL BATTERY WITH A STUDENT

Sexual battery with a student is a related offense to the charges above. Under S.C. Code of Laws §16-3-755, it’s illegal for a private or public school employee to engage in consensual sexual penetration, sexual intercourse, anal sex, or oral sex with an enrolled student who is 16 or 17 years of age.

Offenders face the following consequences:

A felony charge

Up to 5 years in prison

In the event that a student is 18 years or older, one of two outcomes can apply:

If the student is 18 years or older and the school employee had direct supervisory authority over that student, the offender may be charged with a felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

In other instances regarding a student aged 18 or older, the offender is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 30 days in jail.

We want to meet your child!

It says so on their home page! ;)

I admit I haven't read the whole thread, but to answer the question in the thread title, if the other participant is also 17, no.

r113 You sound about as sharp as a basketball.

If she had just been a random 27 year old women, it is fundamentally different that a teacher authority figure having sex with him.

She's a predator.

[quote] It's too bad teaching is not a more respected or well paying profession.

Sure, but the fringe benefits are great.

R85, how about all the male pedophiles who go into the church or GOP politics

And, btw, male teachers are way more likely to abuse than female teachers. But you wouldn't know that from the datalounge. The MRAs rush to post stories like this, while ignoring abusive male teachers

R109, I'd be way more worried about the male teachers

R85, these cases are not more common than they were, say, 10 years ago. Maybe it just seems that way to you because MRAs post them all over the datalounge. And I'd wager the average teacher had more drive and brains than a typical American. Most Americans don't even have a college degree.

R118 agreed, male are abusers and rapists. As I said I don't think that an affair with an older woman can really harm a teenager unles it is some incestuous shit or if the boy is under 14.

But it was a "Christian" school. There is something somewhere in the bible about the young stud shall layeth with knowledgeable whore.

[quote] And I'd wager the average teacher had more drive and brains than a typical American.

Maybe that used to be the case when college educated women had few choices besides being a schoolteacher, but not anymore.

Women are getting smarter. They used to be brainwashed that it is dignified to go for older men, that they have to like men for their brains not bodies etc. But some of them see that it's all bulshit and it is better to ride s young and firm stud while they can.

But most women aren't college educated

America couldn't function without teachers. Weird to see people attacking them. You think everyone is willing or able to homeschool their kids?

I'm sure the good Christian school taught him that he.must not spill his seed on the. ground, so you can't blame him for finding and using a willing receptacle, instead.

The 17 year old must be so embarrassed by his mother's rantings. "Ruined?" Shut your trap lady! Your big, buff always horny and jerkin off football playin' son L-O-V-E-D fucking that teacher. I'll bet he shot buckets of cum the second the head of cock got into that snatch.

The second time? Yea, he got few pumps in and then, again, shot loads of spunk, filled the teacher to the brim and left her dripping.

I bet the 17 year old's father (who hasn't spoken of his outrage publicly and we all know why - he's impressed with juniors antics and that he got a hot babe) is also cringing at his wife's screeching.

Football player has been to Paris, how will Mommy keep him on the farm? Clue - she can't! Ha ha Ha!

Teacher was an idiot and should be prosecuted. Hope her husband files for divorce, takes the kids, and makes sure she's shit out of luck.

Maybe mom is secretly jealous.

We mature faster in the south.

I think it’s the heat. Or, the gin.

No comment.

[quote]If she gets knocked up.

R28 thats HER problem, not his, she's the older more mature person in this situation.

This isnt rape in most jurisdictions where the age of consent is 16, i.e.all of Australia/NZ, most of Europe, South America, even many states in the USA. Big issue here is that she was in a position of authority

That area of SC is really poor and backwards. I didn’t see any Black kids in the photo of the football team, yet Orangeburg is mostly Black. All those Christians down there are the biggest hypocrites and on top of that are bored out of their minds. Of course they’re going to fuck around town with whoever, especially if they’re good looking. You know that boy had been around the barn plenty of times, there’s nothing else to do. Too bad it had to be at Pizza Hut, that’s embarrassing.

"Big issue here is that she was in a position of authority "

Yes r130 that's been stated about 30 times already

R99 She got a glimpse of what the boy was packin' and had to have it now now NOW!

Understandable.

I just wonder what they're going to talk about at Thanksgiving.

I googled and the age of consent in South Carolina is 16 so legally this is absolutely not rape. Morally - as a teacher in a power position having sex with a current student is obviously a whole different story. She shouldn't have done it but it wasn't illegal unless the boy was aged 15 years and under.

I find it extremely difficult to believe that a 17 year old having sex has "ruined his life" as his parents claim. Hysterical fucking christians of course.

R135 went to high school in SC—’cause he’s too stoopid to understand the law.

What the fuck are you even going on about R136?

Read the fucking thread—and know that the age of consent is not hhe legal or moral issue here…look up the SC criminal code and get back to us…but don’t make us wait very long. We are not tolerant of your stupidity.

I’m so sick of women getting a free pass and men being vilified for everything. This country has so many weird sexual hangups.

r138 You tried

We had a bunch of predatory teachers. The woman of the group who was a decent teacher, kinda goofy looking and dressed in spandex workout gear on teacher student switch day during spirit week, was fucking 2 of those hot, but too big of a nerd to fuck guys in ROTC. They fought one another a gun was found and one or them tried to hang himself from a tree in front of the school. Sordid shit in 1993. Never made the news.

[quote]Is sex with a 17-yr. old football player "rape"?

That was OP's question R136/R138. Legally - it is not rape.

Go fuck yourself you bitter little sanctimonious cunt R138.

You are 134 posts behind the eight ball. Go cunt somewhere else.

Obviously a troubled marriage and that's fucked too. They can't stop bringing up that all parties are Christian too. I guess told them to act in his name.

Love thy neighbour, R144!

R131 , Look again, Hellen Keller. Is 7 Black Irish? Sicilian American?

If the boy is 14, he' s not bad at all.

I was a teen and making love to married men in their 30s with families. They knew how to make love and were wildly horny.

Very happy treasured memories.

teens making love to married men

R117

It’s always those GOP or those in the church that fuck the underage. Surveys have shown that liberals never do this and that no man currently posting on DL ever has given a BJ to a 16 yo. These surveys never lie.

I am a teacher and I sometimes masturbate thinking about certain students of mine. I'm a college professor, so there's that difference.

She probably found out he had a huge cock. When I was in high school there was one guy in my gym class (16 years old) who was hung like a bull, and he knew it and was very proud of it, parading around after gym in the showers swinging that big ol' hog. It was well known he was putting that thing to good use with many of the girls in school. Sadly he's long dead now. What a loss of good meat.

R150 such a relief to know that liberals never fuck the underage and that liberal backed surveys never lie

Me too.

R153

As all liberal know the liberal surveys are real and the ones the GOP do are fake surveys done only to fool stupid liberals. I look to R117 for my source on this.

Liberals are the good people the conservatives are not. Once you realize and memorize this all issues become simple to understand and easy to solve. (the new modern social and political education)

The guy was in no way victimized by sticking his dick in a 27-year-old. Especially in the culture/conditioning of today.

In high school in the '90s, I knew girls and guys who were fucking much older people at 14, 15, 16. They knew what they wanted, and they went for it. And they're fine now.

Straight dudes are desperately ready to fuck from freshman year on. They're no victims. I think people forget what it was like to be hormonal at that age. I haven't.

They guy was psyched, but mom found out and decided to go after a paycheck/Karen fame.

Had that happen here at a Catholic school, the teacher got 25 years but she only served 7

I know people want to say boys and girls are the same, but there IS a big difference between a boy sleeping with a teacher and a girl sleeping with a teacher. Girls can have sex without being sexually aroused, therefore you can interpret the act in several different ways. She wanted it, she was coerced, she was manipulated, she was raped. You can say all those things about boys of course, but it's hard to deny a hard cock. In the face of a hard cock, the sex seems a lot less predatory.

"MY $ON;$ LIFE I$ RUINED!!!" His mom blasting this stuff publicly is probably way more traumatizing for the young man than the heinous act with a cute bimbo teacher.

This is more about the mom than the son. She's just eager to get her slice of the victimization pie popularized by Trump, hence her Fox News interview.

Boys are not girls. That's just a fact. This was a trophy for him. Especially at age 17.

And now she's fucked up his future by publicizing it. His real name will be all over the internet forever.

R160, His name has not been revealed, only her name.

It will be, R161.

Ya gotta feel bad for her publicly humiliated husband.

Maybe in 1950, R163.

Now this is a marketing plus for Onlyfans.

So many accounts are about "straight" husbands watching their wives get fucked by hot young studs.

R160 agree with most, but this kind of self victimization you really can not blame on Trump. He would probably have encouraged the boy to garb the teacher by the pussy. This is more of a victimization enticed woke ideology that wants to artificially turn horny young men into precious sexless princesses on the pea that could be hurt by sexual intercourse with a bit older woman.

r164 link please - sounds hot

[quote]His name has not been revealed, only her name.

It's not like there are whole websites detailing the varsity football rosters of every high school in the US, including names, numbers, and positions.

It's no problem finding out who is this season's QB of the Holly Hill Academy Raiders.

I know girls who fucked HS teachers. 1970s. It was considered only mildly scandalous because it was a teacher, not because it was a grown man. HS girls used to fuck college boys and enlisted young men. Nobody much cared.

And I knew plenty of guys and girls who fucked college professors 1980s. It was a different time. I fucked some professors when I was in college and grad school but they were not my teachers, just horndogs on campus. I don't think this is tolerated anymore.

I don't remember boys fucking HS teachers - either men or women teachers. It was easy for jocks to find sex with peers.

For R166:

[quote]I find it extremely difficult to believe that a 17-year-old having sex has "ruined his life" as his parents claim. Hysterical fucking christians of course.

Right, R135. Mama has her hand out for a paycheck but isn't too bright. If she had said, "The school district was negligent by allowing a sexual predator near minor children," OK. But no 17-year-old man has had his life ruined by getting pussy sans pregnancy.

[quote]I know girls who fucked HS teachers. 1970s. It was considered only mildly scandalous because it was a teacher, not because it was a grown man.

Once you're old enough to get past the fairytale idea of your parents that they spin for you, the truth is always more interesting. I found out that my 16 yo mom's (Black mom, btw) first love was a 21 year old white guy who would swing by and pick her up on his motorcycle - AND my grandmother encouraged the relationship! However at around 17 my mom had met my dad and fell in love. Her older boyfriend came by to propose to her and my mom made my grandma go downstairs and tell him to leave. To this day my mom regrets having treated him so coldly like that. But again, she was a 17 year old girl. And of course my parents were divorced by 27, so she really wonders what might have been. This would have all started around 1964.

Teen guys tend to come as soon as something is on their dick - no staying power.

Fortunately, they are ready to go again in just a couple of minutes, so you can just keep working that cock.

The teacher is clearly without judgement. Rape- probably not at all- come on. Ruin his life, probably not at all. When I was in college, girls just a little older than him had sex/affairs with professors not infrequently. Very dumb of the professors- but not illegal and not rape. Most 17 year old boys have sexual experience. The real problem here is the teacher using her authority inappropriately- although this all could have been a fantasy for the guy.

It’s funny how sex with 17 year old girl would be fine but sex with a 19 year old would be against the law.

I feel bad for everyone on this thread that thinks this was OK.

99% of you think it's ok because you're thinking back to yourselves as a young, naive, repressed 17 year old and wishing you had a chance to unload on anything other than your right hand back then. But the problem is that normal sexual development is generally tied to an equal balance of power and experience. For a much more experienced 27 year old teacher, who has a professional obligation to protect the safety of students in the school, to manipulate a less experienced 17 year into something like this (or to let the 17 year old manipulate her into it) is just wrong. Even if the 17 year old was sexually experienced, they are not on the same emotional development level of an adult who has real world experience... it is absolute manipulation and its morally wrong, regardless of the "hot for teacher" connotations.

Is his name Joel?

Thank you, Miss Fleming / AI bot at R174. Let us know when the shuttle lands.

R174 It was certainly wrong, but arguing that it was so traumatic for a 17 year old to have sex with someone he found attractive is absurd. What if anything will be "traumatic" about it is people acting like he was a 10 year old boy who got raped in the ass by his priest.

r174 You've come up with an argument against comments that no one (or only a couple) here has stated.

R174, some of those kids are so traumatized, and their lives ruined that they only amount to things like marrying their abusers and becoming presidents of countries, like France.

R114, I was trying to point out that the question as stated in the title would always have to be answered by "it depends" (because there would always be a possibility, according to that wording, that the other participant was also underage) and that it maybe should be rephrased for that reason.

I always feel bad for a friend of mine who was a 23 year old English teacher when he ended up sleeping with a 16 year old student. He spent a year in prison and because he was a teacher he had to register as a 3rd degree sex offender, or something like that. He’s in his 40s now and still can’t leave the country, find employment with a company (he has to work for himself), or work anywhere near children. It’s crazy how a choice at 24, outside of something that caused the death of someone else, ruined the rest of his adult life. He’s 42 now and his victim is 35.

Someone post his uncensored face pic! Google turns up nothing.

Her husband is a troll.

[quote]I really don't consider 16/17 year olds to be little kids? They oversexualize themselves a lot of the time and look like adults.

Hello, resident pedo.

Fucking read the thread, R181!

It was posted in R46...

Gen Z sees itself as victims so I doubt this 17 year old didn’t actually say that she ruined his life.

R185, most of us have lives. Sit the fuck down.

Someone who is sexually attracted to 16/17 is not a pedophile. Just sayin.

Someone attracted to prepubescent children (children who haven’t reached sexual maturity) is a pedophile. Someone attracted to pubescent children11-14 primarily is a hebephile. Someone attracted primarily to people 15-18 is an ephebophile. Someone who is primarily attracted to adults but occasionally finds themselves attracted to 16-18 year olds is called sentient.

R95 "Let's not be hypocrites and pretend that it is the same as girl being seduced by an older man or even a gay boy being fucked by an older man. Because you know that society doesn't project shame on active participant in sexual intercourse, as it does on passive one."

so, based on this, it's ok for an older male teacher to bottom for one of his teenage students? It's just the "active" position that's the problem?

F190 no one is saying it’s OK. It’s just not the same.

[quote] Someone who is sexually attracted to 16/17 is not a pedophile. Just sayin.

Perhaps. But I’m willing to bet the only reason this teacher didn’t fuck someone younger is because she didn’t have any freshmen in her classes.

R190 Sort of. I really don’t see a gay bottom being a molester. I mean if he did present the hole to a young boy, the boy doesn't have to fill the hole, he can kick him in the ass. If one puts his dick in someone, how can you be raped, even if he is underage.

Of course, I think that both women and gay bottoms should stay away from boys under say 15 or 14 years old.

sorry, how can he be raped*

50% of the comments are by people too dumb or biased to process that what constitutes rape is based on law, just as it can also be based on personal morality. If the action breaks the law, it is rape. No matter if some feel it was not a moral transgression.

Legally - it's still not rape no matter how many hysterics are thrown in to convince people otherwise. If it's legally not rape then it isn't rape and that's the end of the story.

Yes in this case it's not rape and was not charged as rape.

R189

And what do they call Chicken Queen's today?

[quote]Is sex with a 17-yr. old football player "rape"?

If I've trained him right.

R198 they are still Chicken Hawks. The cool thing is the older you get the younger legal 20-25 year olds look.

Statutory Rape is sex with anyone who is not of legal age no matter if they are consenting or not. So I would imagine this student was of legal age to consent to having sex.

R200 seemed like he consented when he put his cock in teacher's pussy.

He's better taking cock than giving it.

The legal age of consent in Italy is 14 with no exceptions, 13 if the partner is under 18. That means a full ass grown adult can have legal sex with a 14 yo. So I think this kid is ok.

What a seriously stupid woman. All she had to was wait a whole year then she could cheat on her husband without worrying about legal repercussions. Even then it probably wouldn't have been worth it. No teenage boy really knows how to fuck and she had a hot middle aged daddy waiting for her at home. I hope those two minutes behind Pizza Hut was good enough to give up her marriage and her freedom. I do feel bad for the hot cuckold husband who will have to explain to the kids why mommy isn't coming home for dinner.

R203 You don't say ...

On some states (Pennsylvania, at least) age makes no difference if one is a teacher and the other a student.

[quote] I hope those two minutes behind Pizza Hut was good enough to give up her marriage and her freedom.

If you men only knew...

I am curious about why OP left out it was a teacher he was involved in - in both thread title and poll. I was 17 once and was having sex for several years before that. The missing detail radically changes results.

R208, I assume that that is the "It Depends..." category.

What I find interesting is that the age of consent in SC is 16 years old. So was the educator part the reason she was arrested?

R45 is stupid.

Perhaps, R209. But the fact OP neglected to include teacher/educator anywhere in their post results in a very flawed poll.

Well just because I am stubborn r211, and for no other reason - The OP DOES post the article in the actual post, AND it says broad as daylight, South Carolina Teacher charged with illicit tryst with Teen. With that being so bold, maybe he felt stating it again would be redundant. Maybe you have your "display links" option set to off if you can't see it.

r211 Yes, you've stated that already. Get over it.

Does SC not have Romeo and Juliet laws? This was illegal for other reasons, but the prattling on about the AoC being 16 misses something in a lot of places.

R211 but that's standard operating procedure on social media these days, opening with provocation and trolling for the expected response. DL is not exception. The grim extension is that many people are functioning as outrage and scandal trolls and are too stupid to even recognize it because they really thing his a normal way to communicate. Such as OP.