Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Harry and Meghan slam ‘savage’ ‘Family Guy’ attack as an ‘outrageous slur’

The pair, who quit royal life in 2020, have been feeling like “they’re not being taken seriously enough by people” and that they “can’t catch a break,” the source adds.

“Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this and is desperate for a solution. They’re in full panic mode,” a source told the outlet, adding that the couple has called it an “attack from inside Hollywood.”

“What’s hit them hardest and cuts the deepest of all is that it plays up the whole notion they’re self-entitled grifters or spoilt brats,”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 251December 5, 2023 10:35 AM

Stop linking to the New York Post, all they ever do is print Republican lies

by Anonymousreply 1November 10, 2023 7:07 AM

Owwwwwww my pussy hurts.

by Anonymousreply 2November 10, 2023 7:08 AM

What fucking useless shitheads are these two, demanding to be taken more seriously and respected..

by Anonymousreply 3November 10, 2023 7:32 AM

Seems to me the people who are really useless shithead are the media like the NYPOST who are making millions writing articles about them. Why are you British queens so obsessed with them? They are are not politicians, they are not making laws, they are not titans of industry. So they are like most actors trying to make a buck, big deal. Some of you need to get laid and let it go already.

by Anonymousreply 4November 10, 2023 7:57 AM

R4 Why bring the British into this? The writers of Family Guy aren't British. The NY Post isn't British. The DLers posting about them aren't British.

I'm an actual Brit living in Britain and only ever hear anything about them from Americans on DL.

by Anonymousreply 5November 10, 2023 8:08 AM

The DL is full of Brits obsessed with them. There are hundreds of threads about them. I am telling you, most Americans could give a rats ass about them. Totally indifferent because we are not wrapped up in the daily musings of the Monarchy. They are reserve by American standards if we are talking about celebrities.

by Anonymousreply 6November 10, 2023 8:18 AM

R6 The posters obsessed with them are not British. British people are not 'wrapped up in the daily musings of the Monarchy', whatever that means. The obsessives are American.

by Anonymousreply 7November 10, 2023 8:24 AM

If it quacks like a duck...

by Anonymousreply 8November 10, 2023 8:25 AM

[quote] most Americans could give a rats ass about them

Could *NOT give a rat’s ass. People need to stop using this expression if they can’t even say it right and end up giving it the opposite meaning.

by Anonymousreply 9November 10, 2023 8:31 AM

R9 oh fuck off twat. It can work either way.

by Anonymousreply 10November 10, 2023 8:33 AM

[quote]The DL is full of Brits obsessed with them. There are hundreds of threads about them. I am telling you, most Americans could give a rats ass about them.

You have it backwards, R6. If you want to hear nothing about the lot of them, go to the UK. It will be a fucking very long wait to hear any friends or acquaintances or people on the street or in the pub say a word about the royal family.

But come to Data lounge and find a world of Anglophilia: tea at the Ritz, tea at Fortnum & Mason, scones, Harrod's food halls, people queued up to see the Royal Paintings Collection, any kind of royal palace, any royal stables, anything Downton Abbey-ish, the royal jewels, the changing of the guard, the "romantic" exile of Wallis and Edward, rehashed (again) 43 year old discussions about whether one's sympathies were with Charles Ryder or Sebastian Flight and the perfection of the casting...That's all stuff a subset of Americans lap up like a kitten does milk. People in the UK don't follow all these twee, thatched roof fantasies - it's the stuff of tourists.

by Anonymousreply 11November 10, 2023 8:43 AM

The truth hurts...

by Anonymousreply 12November 10, 2023 8:59 AM


Keep your grubby Brit hands off them . They now belong to us


We always had queens and Duke Ellington now we are happy to have our very own Royal couple. And we are keeping them . We are also keeping that cia woman that ran over and killed your motorcyclist.


by Anonymousreply 13November 10, 2023 9:39 AM

Highly dubious.

by Anonymousreply 14November 10, 2023 10:02 AM

That version can stay in my screen.

by Anonymousreply 15November 10, 2023 10:07 AM

Lol, these fucking grifters stamping their feet and demanding to be taken seriously!

Can't their PR people drum up some sort of gala where they can give themselves a People Most Worthy of Respect award.

Btw, thought the South Park ep was way more scathing, yet they didn't say shit about that. Why has 'Family Guy' cut so deeply?

by Anonymousreply 16November 10, 2023 10:24 AM

This is coasting into what called the “Streisand Effect” where they actually draw even more negative response to themselves by drawing attention to it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17November 10, 2023 10:36 AM

Everyone is scared of South Park, r16. The show might not be as relevant as it once was, but only an idiot would fuck with Trey and Matt.

by Anonymousreply 18November 10, 2023 10:46 AM

I would respect Harry a lot more if he would ditch the gold digger.

by Anonymousreply 19November 10, 2023 10:46 AM

[quote]only an idiot would fuck with Trey and Matt.

And your point would be...?

by Anonymousreply 20November 10, 2023 10:48 AM

[quote] oh fuck off twat. It can work either way.

No, it doesn’t work either way. If you stop to think about it “could care less” means you do care.

by Anonymousreply 21November 10, 2023 10:57 AM

I'm afraid no matter how they would have handled the split with the Royals they would have been on the losing end of the stick. The very fact that they wanted something other than a Royal life made them sitting targets for the world media. Anything, no matter how big or small they did after the split was going to be picked apart in minute detail. IMO they should have never come to LA. Their plans were always far too grandiose. They should have stayed incommunicado for a few years, lived within their means rather than living a lifestyle that required them to scrape every shekel they could come up with to support it, and then once the hubbub died down start their philanthropic endeavors small, eschewing all media coverage, and built up slowly. I believe that would have made the public much more kind to them. The way they did things they made themselves a spectacle with all the huge money deals and people looked upon them as money hungry and crass.

But the damage is done. Their best bet at this point would be to leave the US and learn to live within their means. They undoubtedly have a fortune to fall back on if they'd stop spending like it's growing on trees. They could live wonderful lives back in the UK working for their charities. I doubt Meghan would go for that though. I believe she'll divorce him before she'll ever move back to the UK for good.

I think what it all boils down to is immaturity on both their parts.

by Anonymousreply 22November 10, 2023 11:07 AM

Why would they be taken seriously? Why do they think that is a reasonable expectation? They are so strange.

by Anonymousreply 23November 10, 2023 11:17 AM

In other words, they perform a desperate Teacake-like grasp for relevance and attention.

by Anonymousreply 24November 10, 2023 12:00 PM

Harry just made an appearance, via videotape, at a charity, something to do with wounded vets. Tom Hanks was there and Bruce Springsteen performed so pretty A List for him. No mention of The Claw.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25November 10, 2023 12:01 PM

Fuck these two.

by Anonymousreply 26November 10, 2023 12:43 PM

a pox on the Griffin house!

by Anonymousreply 27November 10, 2023 1:10 PM

But they ARE spoiled brats! They are, Blanche!

by Anonymousreply 28November 10, 2023 1:22 PM

I don't take the NY Post seriously.

It's fun to read if you read it, and know it, for what it is- a right- wing, agenda driven, pulled out their ass rag.

But the larger point remains. What is the point of the fame of the Sussexes?

To be fair, that could be asked about any famous person or couple, and, I think they have achieved one thing- they seem to be accepted, and travel in, the circles they want to be seen in, but, the question remains.

I'm no fan of Greydon Carter. He is, however, a qualified expert witness when it comes to assessing the rich and famous. Being the long-time editor of Vanity Fair magazine will do that for you.

He has openly remarked that Markle will dump Harry now that she's got the fame, title and sees a lane to keep climbing without him. Might not be soon, but one day.

I agree.

by Anonymousreply 29November 10, 2023 1:45 PM

"You've had everything handed to you, but you claim your life is hard and written about it in your new book 'Waaagh'"


by Anonymousreply 30November 10, 2023 1:57 PM

Celebrities always come out looking great when they go after parodies/satire/comedians. It really gets the sympathy of the common people

by Anonymousreply 31November 10, 2023 1:59 PM

I think that’s been a given from the start. They aren’t the Duke and Duchess of Windsor type. It will happen when Megs has milked him for everything he has.

by Anonymousreply 32November 10, 2023 2:01 PM

If they need any lessons in grifting they should call me.

by Anonymousreply 33November 10, 2023 2:10 PM

Thanks, R28.

That's exactly the quote I thought of after reading this story.

by Anonymousreply 34November 10, 2023 2:28 PM

R22 makes a lot of sense

by Anonymousreply 35November 10, 2023 2:31 PM

This Royal couple , has fallen down so far from what they once were , almost as far as ESPN has

by Anonymousreply 36November 10, 2023 2:33 PM

One of the threads about this couple on DL had a post that basically listed all that Harry has lost since marrying Meghan and moving to LA. Basically everything. His family, his friends, his culture, his comfort, his country. He must be miserable. When they finally divorce he will probably be relieved. I think that when he comes back home he will be embraced with open arms like the prodigal son.

by Anonymousreply 37November 10, 2023 2:37 PM

Um, but they are entitled grifting whiners

by Anonymousreply 38November 10, 2023 2:38 PM

[quote] “Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this and is desperate for a solution.

Yeah, that's Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 39November 10, 2023 2:42 PM

[quote] I think that when he comes back home he will be embraced with open arms like the prodigal son.

Seriously? After everything he said on Oprah and put in his book about them?

Charles... maybe. The rest of them? No fucking way.

by Anonymousreply 40November 10, 2023 4:05 PM

I meant the people of England who still support the monarchy more so than the family.

by Anonymousreply 41November 10, 2023 5:16 PM

There was that great line in S1 of The Crown, where the Duke of Windsor says “In this family when you’re in, you’re never quite sure you’re in but when you’re out, there’s no doubt at all. You’re out.”

Harry can return, Charles (and only he) will forgive, the rest will tolerate him in small doses. He’ll pick up where he left off with a few friends, the ones who don’t run with William’s crowd in any case. It won’t be like before MM and he’ll have difficulty adjusting to that. Charles will need to set him up with something to keep him occupied.

by Anonymousreply 42November 10, 2023 5:22 PM

R41 Absolutely no way.

by Anonymousreply 43November 10, 2023 5:23 PM

If, when they chose to leave, they had deliberately flown under the radar for a year or two, and found a smaller, less expensive place to live, (NOT in an area they thought was important to high level Hollywood celebs) they would have been much more sought after by West Coast A listers. It's that group that I think Harry's wife wanted to be an adored addition to. After all, consider her giving wedding invitations to the Clooneys, for example, rather than more lowly members of her own family - that spoke volumes about where Mrs Harry's interest always was.

Then there was the jaw dropping episode at the Lion King premiere, where Harry blew off the long time invitation to a memorial for murdered Royal Marines (a patronage of his) to corral the head of Disney to suck up and put the bite on the man for a gig for Harry's wife.

Their ineptitude is stunning.

They just don't get it. Don't know how the game is played.

A smart person could have made it all work with a better understanding of how to behave, but H & M are sooo stupid that they threw it all away.

by Anonymousreply 44November 10, 2023 8:25 PM

Joy...Rapture...Another thread on them!

How'd I miss this thread on Mr. and Mrs. Harry Mountbatten-Windsor of Montecito, CA, USA?

Spot On, "Family Guy!"

Just saw the second stringers of the Montecito branch of the Mountbatten-Windsors are once again trying to have it their way...not working as full-time members of the BRF, but still playing catchup with those working members!

Without snark, it's good when they highlight veterans and what not...But stop making it about yourselves, you dimwits!!!

Love this term for them..."Cosplay Royals."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45November 12, 2023 4:34 PM

[quote]“What’s hit them hardest and cuts the deepest of all is that it plays up the whole notion they’re self-entitled grifters or spoilt brats”

Gosh, whatever would give people that idea?

by Anonymousreply 46November 12, 2023 4:48 PM

[quote]... 43 year old discussions about whether one's sympathies were with Charles Ryder or Sebastian Flight


by Anonymousreply 47November 12, 2023 4:50 PM

They’re so phoney. Everything is about their “brand”.

by Anonymousreply 48November 12, 2023 5:16 PM

When was the last time you heard a senior media executive call any "celebrity" a 'fucking grifter'? Bill Simmons said this because, from personal experience, he knows this to be true. He said it publicly. No one objected to this statement. No one. Do you know why? Because that's what they are: fucking grifters. They're over. He'll go back to England; she'll continue grasping at a straws.

by Anonymousreply 49November 12, 2023 5:38 PM

Yes but remember, Simmons is far from your typical media executive. I assume he was given the position when Spotify bought The Ringer.

He's known for shooting his mouth off.

by Anonymousreply 50November 12, 2023 5:50 PM

^ You're right, he's not typical but evidently was involved enough in their Spotify deal to draw that conclusion. That kind of public shade is unusual - even for a guy shooting his mouth off. He said if he's drunk enough, he'll tell the whole story. I'm still waiting.

by Anonymousreply 51November 12, 2023 6:14 PM

He’s in charge of Spotify podcasts, right?

He has firsthand experience with their work ethic, or lack thereof.

Listen, they are lightning rods and therefore their work gets sampled. Bill would have loved to work with them to find the right vehicles.

by Anonymousreply 52November 12, 2023 6:23 PM

Harry is a pothead gamer who spends much of his time on PornHub jerking off to trannies. Meghan badgers him for sex all the time but he can't get it up during sex with her anymore.

by Anonymousreply 53November 12, 2023 6:44 PM

R22 "I'm afraid no matter how they would have handled the split with the Royals they would have been on the losing end of the stick." And then you tell us how it might have been different:

"Their plans were always far too grandiose. They should have stayed incommunicado for a few years, lived within their means rather than living a lifestyle that required them to scrape every shekel they could come up with to support it, and then once the hubbub died down start their philanthropic endeavors small, eschewing all media coverage, and built up slowly. I believe that would have made the public much more kind to them. The way they did things they made themselves a spectacle with all the huge money deals and people looked upon them as money hungry and crass."

Had their post-royal choices been closer to your very sane advice, their story could be different. I agree. Unfortunately for them - but like manna from heaven for DL - they didn't. The public reception would have been much kinder if they did. I'm not sure they have could won everyone over as they've too often proven themselves to be repellent (her father, his book for starters), but they'd have had a better chance at acceptance with a more measured approach, the one they didn't take.

Not that either of them has ever heard of, much less read John Greenleaf Whittier but "For all sad words of tongue and pen, The saddest are these, 'It might have been.'

And now it's over: they're once again the punchline of an animated show and Harry's wife said she won’t be humiliated like this. "Won't be?" That train left the station a while ago.

by Anonymousreply 54November 12, 2023 6:49 PM

Family Guy is still on?

by Anonymousreply 55November 12, 2023 7:21 PM

What's brilliant is that Meghan is totally stuck in the 90s and early 2000s and the two shows which skewered her and Harry had their heyday in that era too, so to her it's probably even a bigger sting.

by Anonymousreply 56November 12, 2023 7:39 PM

I'm quite disappointed that they never tried to sue South Park.

by Anonymousreply 57November 12, 2023 8:25 PM

Who still watches family guy? She's a professional crybaby.

by Anonymousreply 58November 12, 2023 9:14 PM

R57 It would probably be pointless. .. Has anyone ever been able to sue Southpark? .. As I recall, even Tom Cruise with the resources of Scino behind opted to not follow-through. .. Courts have ruled that satire and parody is protected.

by Anonymousreply 59November 12, 2023 9:30 PM

Even Stewie wouldn't fuck her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60November 12, 2023 11:08 PM

[quote]You have it backwards, [R6]. If you want to hear nothing about the lot of them, go to the UK. It will be a fucking very long wait to hear any friends or acquaintances or people on the street or in the pub say a word about the royal family.

Oh so those millions of people that stand in the streets during the Queen's Jubilee or the King's coronation are all Americans? Bitch Please.

by Anonymousreply 61November 12, 2023 11:21 PM

WANTED : One Soul.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62November 13, 2023 1:21 AM

The castle has been stormed in many ways these days. People over being poor and watching what they can never have. I love reading comments from former Kartrashian fans who shame them on their social channels for their vapid greed and opulence.

by Anonymousreply 63November 13, 2023 2:15 AM

To the Markles:

The shoe fits, sweeties.

by Anonymousreply 64November 13, 2023 2:17 AM

R63 The Royals have been exposed for the greedy corrupt frauds they have always been.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65November 13, 2023 5:40 AM

R54 Is too deranged to realize none of her babbling makes sense unless you live her "Lady" Colin Campbell bizzarro world. Reality check dear : His Ladyship's name is George.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66November 13, 2023 5:50 AM

R1 That’s not true. They are a tabloid paper with a conservative slant for sure. They aren’t serious journalism but I do appreciate the Post for posting serious crime stories that sometimes the mainstream media won’t touch because of political correctness.

by Anonymousreply 67November 13, 2023 5:58 AM



The people you see camping out overnight for Jubilee events or dressed head-to-toe in Union Flags are not representative of the British public. They appear in news footage because they're so unusual. Those news reports about roads being closed off for street parties etc are because those events are unusual and not something we see very often.

On a day-to-day basis we don't have blanket coverage of the Royal Family and their comings and goings. The Daily Mail website isn't really representative of the British media in general - it's barely even representative of the actual physical Daily Mail newspaper.

The kind of coverage H&M get on DL is insane compared to what I hear of them here in the UK. There's like a collective national eyeball here when it comes to them. It might have an element of "omg they pulled out of the Royal Family/they insulted the Queen etc" to it, but there's no real interest in them here. It veers more toward a passive aggressive pointed indifference, which is something we Brits are very good at.

by Anonymousreply 68November 13, 2023 7:04 AM

*eyeball = eyeroll

by Anonymousreply 69November 13, 2023 7:06 AM

[quote]Oh so those millions of people that stand in the streets during the Queen's Jubilee or the King's coronation are all Americans? Bitch Please.

No, R61, of course the majority were British, but there's a difference in using a holiday to see an event that may not occur again in one's lifetime.

I have friends and acquaintances whom I've never known to discuss the royal family beyond the rare funny allusion to their foibles. I know they walked to the coronation route or stood in line to view the casket because they posted an image in Instagram. They went out of curiosity for the marking of a time. They didn't bring home bags full of tea towels and coronation mugs.

Of course there's a contingent of British people who do revere the royal family and the hats and gloves and gowns and carriages and jewels and traditions "and the history," but that's largely sentimental lonelyhearts. My point is that Americans and American gay men go apeshit over this stuff in a way that few Brits do.

The royal family would certainly be a.much leaner organization were it not for the fact that it's benefit to tourism revenues outweighs its costs. The big interest in the family lies outside the borders of the U.K.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 70November 13, 2023 10:13 AM

In his own words (or the ghost writer’s), she played him. Their first meeting, he was late, she benignly forgave him but oops, she had another “appointment” so she left shortly thereafter. No one had ever done that before. The temerity! The audacity! He was hooked. And he puts this in his memoir as some kind of incredible, wondrous meeting when actually it was a very calculated ruse. He was just too dumb to see it but everyone else does.

by Anonymousreply 71November 13, 2023 10:35 AM

Yikes ! Waity Katie hit the wall. Hard. That vile family sucks the life right outa you. Harry was smart to dump those vampires.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 72November 13, 2023 3:52 PM

R70 Then why do you continue to finance their circus? Disingenuous.

by Anonymousreply 73November 14, 2023 5:03 AM

Harry should dump Meghan and go back to servicing British soldier cock.

by Anonymousreply 74November 14, 2023 9:26 AM

[quote]My point is that Americans and American gay men go apeshit over this stuff in a way that few Brits do.

I have known hundreds of gay men in my lifetime in the U.S., NONE of them ever talk about "the royals". In fact the last time it was a thing with gay men was way back with Diana. After that, the Royals were dead to us. And I am talking about old and younger gays. They do not care.

by Anonymousreply 75November 14, 2023 9:36 AM

R73 is too stupid for this place.


The tourism dollars generated from the existence of the BRF exceeds the cost to the UK public coffers.

Now cue the inevitable rush to point out that France generates tourism without a living Royal family.

For whatever reason that smarter minds than the one I have can present, there is a reason for the difference.

by Anonymousreply 76November 14, 2023 12:46 PM

Even the most mild criticism or satire is the MOST outrageous slur to these two nitwits.

by Anonymousreply 77November 14, 2023 1:11 PM

“Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this"

That horse left the barn a while ago...

by Anonymousreply 78November 14, 2023 1:14 PM

Actually the horse lives in Buckingham Palace with the King.

by Anonymousreply 79November 14, 2023 1:18 PM

Their brand. Their truth. Their journey. Now all they need is some deep healing!

by Anonymousreply 80November 14, 2023 1:33 PM

They make themselves look like even bigger idiots by reacting to things like this. Surely if you’re in the public eye, where anybody is fair game, you should never respond openly to jibes and jokes like that. Lest we forget the Streisand effect.

by Anonymousreply 81November 14, 2023 1:38 PM

I think we have all had sufficient when it comes to the RF. With the Queen Elizabeth gone, it feels like a ragtime group of misfits without a leader. Charles isn't cutting it and the kids are all stupid. No one cares anymore.

by Anonymousreply 82November 14, 2023 1:45 PM

r18 except it is Family Guy not South Park.

by Anonymousreply 83November 14, 2023 1:49 PM

What we adore about our Prince and Princess of Wales is their absolute sincerity. Blimey authenticity is written all over Their Royal Highnesses faces. They really care! Unlike those phony arse Harkles.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 84November 14, 2023 4:11 PM

R76 Royalass too stupid to see a shell game con when you're paying for one. Make it simple for a simpleton.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 85November 14, 2023 4:15 PM

R75 fuck off trying to make yourself the self appointed spokesperson for every gay person in the UK. Plenty of gay people like the royals, just like plenty of straight people like them.

by Anonymousreply 86November 14, 2023 5:06 PM

^^ should read USA

by Anonymousreply 87November 14, 2023 5:08 PM

R86 Spot on . Poofs appreciate a good drag queen when we see one.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 88November 14, 2023 7:19 PM

Oh look we found on in the US who cares, hey look everyone r86 is an American who gives a rats ass about the Royals. Unicorn mystery solved. No let the Brit obsession with their Royals continue.

by Anonymousreply 89November 14, 2023 7:21 PM

R83, I was responding to an earlier post. The one I referred to.

by Anonymousreply 90November 15, 2023 3:01 AM

Am I the only one that thinks King Charles does not look like a king? He looks like a conservative banker trying to pull off a look that does not work on him. Just always seems awkward in the Royal cos play gear.

by Anonymousreply 91November 15, 2023 3:57 AM

The royals are all useless parasites.

by Anonymousreply 92November 15, 2023 9:31 AM

[quote]it feels like a ragtime group of misfits

If the royal family had a soundtrack, it wouldn't be ragtime.

by Anonymousreply 93November 15, 2023 9:46 AM

R89 I'm interested to know what is your first language?

by Anonymousreply 94November 15, 2023 9:55 PM

I've been reading the various BRF threads for a long time, and I'm American. We had a huge influx of posters after Harry and Meghan married, but we were here long time before that. But I think there's been a huge loss of interest in them after all their revelations. There are only so many ways to describe the Sussexes as work=shy slags. I still admire many of the other British Royals, and those of other nations. But DL isn't delivering much contact about the Royals lately, so I stick to the other topics where I can offer some content.

by Anonymousreply 95November 15, 2023 10:09 PM

R95" I still admire many of the other British Royals"


Truly curious . Beside an accident of birth what qualities do these people posses that make them admirable to you?

by Anonymousreply 96November 16, 2023 2:42 AM

Our lovely Princess of Wales exhibits the charismatic engaging qualities that make her so beguiling to children.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 97November 16, 2023 2:47 AM

Ok, r96, Here-

You're so much deeper than the rest of us.



by Anonymousreply 98November 16, 2023 2:50 AM

[quote]Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this and is desperate for a solution.

Bitch, stop opening your mouth if you don’t want to be humiliated.

by Anonymousreply 99November 16, 2023 2:56 AM

R98 Not satisfied just confirmed in my option that Royalists are cultists . Brit version of Trumptards.

by Anonymousreply 100November 16, 2023 3:02 AM

Useless white people problems.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 101November 16, 2023 3:06 AM

And yet, r100. here you

In my more than 20 years on the DL, it's weird, but I always managed to ignore topics that didn't interest me by scrolling past them, or, I didn't want to find common cause with trolls.

All of which led me into many battles with Trumptards.

Fuck you for comparing me to a Trumper.

I happen to find the Royals fun to watch and comment on.

If that upsets your delicate superiority, so fucking what.

by Anonymousreply 102November 16, 2023 3:26 AM

here you are^

by Anonymousreply 103November 16, 2023 3:26 AM

Getting a little impatient waiting for their next PR debacle. It usually happens like clockwork and I rely on DL to let me know when it does.

by Anonymousreply 104November 16, 2023 9:30 AM

R104, have you seen this candid photo of Meghan taken by a fan recently? It's not very flattering.

Ozempic face is to be expected. It's the eyebrows that are the most puzzling.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105November 16, 2023 10:26 AM

Yikes, R105! Looks like the side of her face has caved in.

by Anonymousreply 106November 16, 2023 10:40 AM

Wow, at her teeth at r105, now I know why they say your teeth should never be paler that the whites of your eyes! Hideous!

And her eyebrows look curiously hairy and collapsed.

by Anonymousreply 107November 16, 2023 10:51 AM

He looks retarded in this photo.

And her eyebrows were completely different then.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 108November 16, 2023 11:00 AM

W O W Meg's Ozempic-face is shocking, and the sun damage is off the charts. I guess she thinks she looks good?

by Anonymousreply 109November 16, 2023 11:59 AM

Can she not afford to get her brows tended to? Yikes!

by Anonymousreply 110November 16, 2023 2:41 PM

Her face looks very masculine in that awful pic.

by Anonymousreply 111November 16, 2023 3:23 PM

[quote]Can she not afford to get her brows tended to? Yikes!

Probably not. She’s blown through a ton of money.

by Anonymousreply 112November 16, 2023 3:42 PM

Yesterday H G Tudor did an entire episode on why Meghan's fingernail polish was chipped. Too many fires to put out that she's overwhelmed, very last minute heads-up by someone searching for an appearance for them who finally found one, + maybe alcoholism. I'm hoping it's the latter.

Mainly I'm disturbed that he said in that video or another one yesterday that the following were all official narcissists: Angelina Jolie, Mariah Carey, Megan Fox, Chelize Theron, and even sweet little Taylor Fucking Swift! Well I never!!

by Anonymousreply 113November 16, 2023 5:13 PM

R108-R113 See the Derangers have finally pulled a way from your 3rd breakfasts and are seething between snacks. Hot dang! Nothing like trolling you cows on a rainy day. Bon appetite petit cherie

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 114November 16, 2023 6:44 PM

This woman need serious mental help.🤪

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 115November 16, 2023 7:13 PM

Tudor did a couple videos sometime ago on the Pitt/Jolie court case. But he didn't continue. Too bad.

by Anonymousreply 116November 16, 2023 8:47 PM

Someone should rip into her about her fake tan. She must use a similar one to Klangerine.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 117November 17, 2023 9:58 AM

So many pictures I see of Harry now, such as R117, he has this expression of slowly dawning “oh, shit, I’ve ruined my life, what will I do?” That is not a happy man. Meg, of course, constantly has her fake Hollywood smile plastered over her insincere face.

by Anonymousreply 118November 17, 2023 10:08 AM

True, r118.

Plus, he's ugly. Hard to believe Diana was his mother.

by Anonymousreply 119November 17, 2023 10:40 AM

He looks like a squirrel storing nuts in his cheeks in that photo.

by Anonymousreply 120November 17, 2023 11:42 PM

And under his chin, r120

by Anonymousreply 121November 18, 2023 12:55 AM

Who'd Harry get that ski-slope nose from?

by Anonymousreply 122November 18, 2023 1:16 AM

R118 So many pictures I see of William now, such as [R122], he has this expression of slowly dawning “oh, shit, I’ve ruined my life, what will I do?” That is not a happy man.😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123November 18, 2023 2:14 AM

^ Willy's thinking "Who the fuck took down the fence! "

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 124November 18, 2023 2:17 AM


by Anonymousreply 125November 18, 2023 2:21 AM

R123 I don't see how William's done anything to ruin his life. He's basically just living the life of his pre-ordained destiny.

If you want to believe William's not entirely happy, fine. Who is? But he hasn't taken any dramatic action to alter his life the way Harry has.

by Anonymousreply 126November 18, 2023 3:18 AM

William is doing his duty, Harry is not. You don't have to like what you do, but at least William is being a responsible adult.

by Anonymousreply 127November 18, 2023 1:04 PM

R123 Is just a stupid childish cunt trying and failing to be clever.

by Anonymousreply 128November 18, 2023 3:04 PM

R127 Spot on! It's only a matter of time before Harry realizes what a miserable life he's made for himself in the USA and comes crawling back to the warmth of his loving family in the always sunny United Kingdom of Great Britain.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 129November 18, 2023 4:22 PM

^ Yeah looks like he's in living hell.😂

by Anonymousreply 130November 19, 2023 4:16 AM

Scroll down at link to see Haz brimming with happiness!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 131November 19, 2023 9:20 PM

Archie and Lilibet are also fed up and have been secretly texting Grandad to rescue them and bring them home.

by Anonymousreply 132November 19, 2023 9:57 PM

Harry radiating joy.


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 133November 20, 2023 9:57 PM

When you think of it, it really would be intolerable for all parties concerned if the Harkles decided to land in on Christmas. Of course Meghan would have to bring an entourage of nanny's who would be entirely unfitted to walk in to a Royal Palace with established rules and traditions. Imagine the Harkles trying to have everything 'their way' with both the Palace staff and their own 'civilian' American staff. And from what we've heard both Meghan and Harry are not hands on parents (unless of course there is a photographer in the room). Meghan probably wouldn't know how to get through the day with her kids were she left to her own. They made their bed, now they can just marinate in it for the rest of their lives.

by Anonymousreply 134November 20, 2023 10:48 PM

Meghan would want a 12 vehicle motorcade to whisk them from the Heathrow to Sandringham, lol

by Anonymousreply 135November 20, 2023 10:56 PM

Meghan is terrified of her in-laws. She's especially terrified of Catherine. No chance she's 'hanging' with them for any other reason than a major funeral.

by Anonymousreply 136November 20, 2023 11:55 PM

How can someone so ugly, nasty, thirsty and stupid be a prince? He undermines the concept of monarchy just by existing and using his title.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 137November 21, 2023 12:04 PM

[quote] Meghan would want a 12 vehicle motorcade to whisk them from the Heathrow to Sandringham, lol

Complete, of course, with the “near catastrophic” Bond-esque car chase.

by Anonymousreply 138November 21, 2023 12:41 PM

She’s epitome of self-important.

by Anonymousreply 139November 21, 2023 2:16 PM

LOL the Palace released the Sandringham guest list and they are not on it. Nice try Harkles!

by Anonymousreply 140November 21, 2023 2:25 PM

"How can someone so ugly, nasty, thirsty and stupid be a prince? He undermines the concept of monarchy just by existing and using his title". Do tell R137.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 141November 21, 2023 3:36 PM

The Duke of Sussex is preforming with the dignity ,intelligence and the charm of his grandmother the working Royal roles Willy seems incapable of doing without generating gales of laughter. The Windsors chucked their only STAR. Silly clots.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142November 21, 2023 3:56 PM

"Meghan is terrified of her in-laws. She's especially terrified of Catherine."

Who the fuck wouldn't be!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 143November 21, 2023 3:59 PM

Man, these attempts to ridicule William and Kate are pitiful and lame.

Ridicule away at them but at least do it with wit and cleverness, or don’t bother.

by Anonymousreply 144November 21, 2023 4:09 PM

I love Meghan pretending not to watch herself on the screen!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 145November 21, 2023 4:26 PM

[quote]Megs has milked him

Pics please.

by Anonymousreply 146November 21, 2023 4:28 PM

Shocking: Meghan and Harry make a public appearance at the same time a state visit to the UK from the President of South Korea is about to begin. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. Though Kate today was like, hold my beer bitch!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 147November 22, 2023 1:08 AM

These two fugs phony creepiness speaks for itself. They are massive flops in all their obviously staged media whoring. If they are the "future" The House of Windsor is royally fucked.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 148November 22, 2023 1:10 AM

Why are all these anti Meghan posts from Muricans? Your not fooling anyone . We see ya bot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 149November 22, 2023 1:16 AM

Whatever is she doing in the video at R145?

She looks ridiculous.

No wonder she had such a lackluster Hollywood "career" if that is an example of her talent.

by Anonymousreply 150November 22, 2023 1:17 AM

Like man like what makes you think we're not like English dudes? We are also like not like white . We be like black people. Yeah we be like english black people. And we like still HATE the bitch. Its all TRUE.

by Anonymousreply 151November 22, 2023 1:20 AM

Dumb and Drab are nothing if not predictable. No wonder Megsie showed up to a hockey game of all places wearing about $300K worth of jewelry. "Look everyone! I'm THRIVING!!! Meeeeeeee!!!"

by Anonymousreply 152November 22, 2023 2:09 AM

Middleton will always be the " party planner's daughter".😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 153November 22, 2023 2:23 AM

What they really need to do is stage another low speed car chase through the streets of Manhattan being pursued by the paparazzi that they hired to photograph them after another fake award ceremony where Megan wins another phoney “woman of excellence” award, that they also paid for. Because that really worked out so well for them.

(That was when I finally gave up on these two twats.)

by Anonymousreply 154November 22, 2023 3:11 AM

R154 sums it up perfectly

by Anonymousreply 155November 22, 2023 3:23 AM

What do they think savage means, I wonder.

by Anonymousreply 156November 22, 2023 3:33 AM

Man like Maggot & Dimwit could like never dream of being like as crazy ass in LOVE as William and his Catherine!!!. IN THEIR DREAMS bitches!!!!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 157November 22, 2023 3:39 AM

^ Two absolutely miserable people. Reminds me of Charles and Diana at the end. Funny how history repeats its self with this dysfunctional family.

by Anonymousreply 158November 22, 2023 3:44 AM

Kate’s choices in attire have been impeccable.

Until now.

I understand the necessity and tradition of wearing the state color of the country you’re officially hosting.

Here, however, the combined oversize hat, asymmetrical bow across the chest, caped dress, all presented in bold red, no relief from it, is too much.

by Anonymousreply 159November 22, 2023 10:16 AM

Speaking of Kate, we are finally seeing some of the previously little seen baubles from the Royal Vault.

Since the major bling surfaces at State Dinners and Diplomatic Receptions, finally something different for the dinner for the President of South Korea.

Supposedly this tiara has been in the vault for almost a century.


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 160November 22, 2023 2:21 PM

^Hi Meg!!! How's the Hollywood takeover coming? Going to crash anymore red carpets again? Can't wait!

by Anonymousreply 161November 22, 2023 2:22 PM

I’m indifferent to tiaras, but that one Kate is wearing at r160 was worth bringing out of mothballs.

It’s a dazzler without being too much.

by Anonymousreply 162November 22, 2023 6:23 PM

Outrageous slur? Really? They drew Markle with a waist and omitted her stick legs as well as Haz's moobs and gut.

by Anonymousreply 163November 22, 2023 9:12 PM

R159 Katie's "state color" is peach.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 164November 23, 2023 1:42 AM

Funny column in the Telegraph.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 165November 23, 2023 10:04 PM

So apparently the Canuks game that H&M attended was meant to be a fundraiser night for the Autism Society of British Columbia. There is a rumour going around that Harry supplanted a child who was supposed to drop the puck that night.

by Anonymousreply 166November 23, 2023 11:02 PM

Hi management team must really have to be beating the bushes if the best appearance they can get is to fly him to another country to drop a puck. He obviously got no payment for that.

by Anonymousreply 167November 23, 2023 11:42 PM

Showing Harry drop a puck juxtaposed to the Queen doing the same thing begs the question, if Harry didn't want to be a working royal any longer, then why is he doing things like working royals do?

by Anonymousreply 168November 24, 2023 12:08 AM

Great question r168. He’s doing some weird shadow royal duties. Nobody gives a fuck about any of that in the US, not sure about Canada. Maybe they’re testing the waters there

by Anonymousreply 169November 24, 2023 12:14 AM

Harry should apply for a job as a Zamboni driver.

by Anonymousreply 170November 24, 2023 12:58 AM

R170, he'd struggle to stack shelves in WalMart. Anything he does, he'd want his security detail in attendance, too.

by Anonymousreply 171November 24, 2023 5:44 AM

The Sussexes popularity has dropped considerably, even DL has moved on to other targets. Omid Scobie with an assist from the couple is trying to keep the feud alive. Sources close to the Susseses says Meghan would never go back to the UK because it's a soap opera and Kate Middletown is obsessed with Meghan. This is a lead story in the DM and is supposedly carried in People Magazine. I don't see how this tidbit benefits Markle.

by Anonymousreply 172November 24, 2023 3:30 PM

Hilarious take on the Princess of Wales. So, so, so like the narcissistic wife of Harry.

by Anonymousreply 173November 24, 2023 3:44 PM

His Royal Highness Prince Peggy the hamburger flipper,curry cook and piazza deliverer twit.😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 174November 24, 2023 5:02 PM

Princess of Bulimia is so irrelevant to her in-laws they hid her behind the candelabra. All her scheming for this. Pathetic anorexic slag.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 175November 24, 2023 5:10 PM

^ Below the salt.😂

by Anonymousreply 176November 24, 2023 5:11 PM

[quote] Kate Middletown is obsessed with Meghan.

Most outrageous projection since "I'm not a puppet. You're the puppet"

by Anonymousreply 177November 24, 2023 6:18 PM

Candelabra Kate: like Diana/Meghan, if you become more popular than blood Royals, you're shut down. Meghan wasn't a bully, liar or schemer: she was simply too popular. Now Kate is getting a taste the legendary Royals old git jealousy. She earned it.

by Anonymousreply 178November 24, 2023 6:22 PM

Face it Klan Grans:Your dream Royal is nothing more than a jumped up aging bougie mediocrity whose own husband won't even shag her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 179November 24, 2023 6:31 PM

How fat is her neck?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 180November 24, 2023 10:12 PM

Stop trying to make that happen r179

It lost all bite months ago

by Anonymousreply 181November 24, 2023 10:34 PM

Duchess of Bite😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 182November 25, 2023 12:14 AM

^ That slag is rabid.

by Anonymousreply 183November 25, 2023 12:15 AM

R167 We're you born a stupid or do you have to practice?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 184November 25, 2023 12:26 AM

Meghan's spray-tanning is pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 185November 25, 2023 12:27 AM

R180 Now there are two royal racists....this what, the third time they've changed their story?!

by Anonymousreply 186November 25, 2023 1:34 AM

Does anyone actually take Mr & Mrs Sussex seriously at all any more? On any topic? At any time?

And people are literally shoving Harry's wife off the area where photographers get their pictures on the red carpet.

Neither of them appear to have anything to contribute.

by Anonymousreply 187November 25, 2023 3:02 AM

Apparently Harry took the place of an autistic kid who was supposed to drop the puck that the hockey game the Harkles attended. Haz just had to soak up some attention while duplicating something his grandmother did so that he could cosplay working royal. Pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 188November 25, 2023 4:18 AM

They are ALL bloody racist. No only racists but scrounger vampires. Keep groveling and handing over your money.Royalass are really thick dolts..

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 189November 25, 2023 4:20 AM

R188, love how he had to be prompted to drop the puck, he was so busy showboating and soaking up the attention.

He's such a douche.

by Anonymousreply 190November 25, 2023 10:03 AM

How can those grifter Harkles not BEG to come CRAWLING BACK to the glorious United Kingdom without our loving ROYAL FAMILY they are living in bloody HELL! We feel sorry for them!!!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 191November 25, 2023 4:01 PM

In the not too distant past excerpts from Scobie's latest book would have resulted in a 600 post thread. There's r/Saint Meghan Markle on reddit but there's too much vitriol and not enough of the bitchy humor of DL.

by Anonymousreply 192November 25, 2023 9:12 PM

Derangers have no humor the are just psychotic bitches.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 193November 25, 2023 9:57 PM

Lame that he took a kid's place to drop the puck. Not cool.

by Anonymousreply 194November 25, 2023 11:03 PM

R194 Murican racist Trumptard . We see you tiny.

by Anonymousreply 195November 26, 2023 1:58 AM

R192 The fact that there isn't a dozen active threads about H&M on DL anymore is a sign of their increasing irrelevancy. Scobie's book is certainly not making waves, it's barely causing ripples.

by Anonymousreply 196November 26, 2023 4:05 AM

^ Actually thinks DL threads are a sigh of relevancy😂.

by Anonymousreply 197November 26, 2023 4:57 AM

Scobie's cosmetic choices are most unfortunate.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 198November 26, 2023 10:50 AM

As could be expected, Scobie now claims there are two royal racists but still doesn’t name them.

by Anonymousreply 199November 26, 2023 4:04 PM

The Harkles don't seem to be getting the fact hat the castle drawbridge is up as far as they are concerned, and they're standing on the other side of the moat throwing eggs at the palace walls.

The Royal Family is running perfectly well without them, and they are completely and totally irrelevant to the entire monarchy. King Charles just has to trot out some kind of platitude about them every once in a while, which is easy enough to do.

by Anonymousreply 200November 26, 2023 4:12 PM

You know Scobie wants us to believe the "royal racists" are William and Kate. The venom directed at them is over the top and doesn't help the tattered reputations of the Sussexes.

The only benefit I can think of is the Sussexes plan another "documentary" on Netflex or this will be expanded in Meghan's book.

I can't think of any celebrity who built a career on grievances.

by Anonymousreply 201November 26, 2023 4:32 PM

Scathing review in NYT:

“Readers hoping for a death blow of gossip will be disappointed. We’ve heard it before”

“hard not to find Scobie’s dire predictions a tad hyperbolic.”

“devoted to setting the record straight on petty slights against the Sussexes”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 202November 26, 2023 4:42 PM

Scathing review in NYT:

“Readers hoping for a death blow of gossip will be disappointed. We’ve heard it before”

“hard not to find Scobie’s dire predictions a tad hyperbolic.”

“devoted to setting the record straight on petty slights against the Sussexes”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 203November 26, 2023 4:43 PM

[quote]Scobie obliquely accuses [Kate] — presented as cold and lacking in self-assurance — of copying Meghan’s effortless dress sense


by Anonymousreply 204November 26, 2023 5:15 PM

[quote]copying Meghan’s effortless dress sense

effortless indeed, 'just send me the most expensive dress in the collection, I don't need it fitted'

by Anonymousreply 205November 26, 2023 5:20 PM

What you deranged loons can't comprehend is hating Meghan Markle is a multi million dollar industry. It will never stop because too many people make money off of it.

by Anonymousreply 206November 26, 2023 5:24 PM

Harkles critics accuse them of being money-hungry careerists, that's hilarious coming from sycophants to hereditary tax sucking grifters. 'Working Royals" is such a blatant scam that only a dolt would fall for it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 207November 26, 2023 5:32 PM

^ Their teeth have never looked better!

by Anonymousreply 208November 26, 2023 5:38 PM

My gooood, Megzie has hit the wall so hard she splattered onto it!! She looks like shit, oh my god! First, she has aged TERRIBLY. Like super old looking. Secondly, her fake tan is so bad and uneven, is she trying to pass as black once again? The skin is hanging off her face, obviously lost too much weight too quickly. The eyebrows I can't even talk about. Her entire face has changed completely... Yet again!! And the ridiculous shoving of her pinky ring into the camera made me choke on my cabernet!

by Anonymousreply 209November 26, 2023 5:44 PM

Pass me a glass and let's boo and hiss together! Hating her has such a satisfying feel. It's not often you find such a deliciously hateable muse. Amber? Kevin Spacey?

by Anonymousreply 210November 26, 2023 5:48 PM

R209 We know what you're choking on Tiny.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 211November 26, 2023 5:53 PM

R207 says "Working Royals" is such a blatant scam that only a dolt would fall for it."

Statista polling shows that almost two-thirds of the UK's citizenry must be dolts as that's how many support the Royal Family. A bit more than a quarter would prefer an elected head of state. Likewise polling about King Charles showed that as of August 2023, approximately 60 percent of people in Great Britain had a positive opinion of King Charles III, compared with 32 percent who had a negative opinion.

Meghan's supporters here can't speak to facts but they do entertain themselves (and us!) posting childish pictures of themselves here. That's OK: they're a minority on DL and in the United Kingdom.

by Anonymousreply 212November 26, 2023 6:00 PM

LMAO I love how Google presents Her Royal Duchesty the American Actress, behold and guffaw!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 213November 26, 2023 6:14 PM

Kate wanted to copy Meghan's dress sense??? As if we needed any more proof that Scabies wrote his book with the help of Duchess D-list. The only way Kate would ever copy Meghan is if she was in search of a costume for Halloween

by Anonymousreply 214November 26, 2023 6:33 PM

I don’t think Meghan’s clothes are bad choices, it’s the way she wears them. She almost always goes wrong with fit and often with suitability for the occasion, her figure, and the weather. Sometimes she seems like she is just trying to wear money, and that’s tacky.

But I think I like more of her daytime outfits than Kate’s. NOT the way they fit her or the locations or occasions she wears them for, but I like them. They are a little more modern and youthful. I prefer her monochrome top and pants outfits with an oversize coat to Kate’s more closely tailored coat dresses or her day dresses with the ever so slightly too high waists and old-fashioned right at the knee hemlines.

Kate definitely looks better almost all the time. But as far as the actual clothes go, I prefer Meghan’s.

Saying one person is copying another wrt clothes is always nonsense. Certain things get popular or suit an occasion and many people choose to wear them.

by Anonymousreply 215November 26, 2023 6:52 PM

You cannot POSSIBLY claim that you like anything La Meghera is wearing, R215!!! (quite proud of that moniker I came up with, tbh)

by Anonymousreply 216November 26, 2023 7:33 PM

No sane person, unless they were paid to troll would be outraged by Harry telling his own story, but not mind the Windsors fleecing their citizens after they die. While claiming the money went to charity the phony royal grifters funneling it into BRF property empire valued at 12 billion pounds. Accident of birth scroungers. Royalist = Cultist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 217November 26, 2023 7:36 PM

R217, are you paid to be here??

by Anonymousreply 218November 26, 2023 7:39 PM

74 million Americans thought Trump was doing a great job but at least they had a vote. Your poll results are less than moot. Charles is a feckless corrupt wanker and everyone including his Mummy knew it. Your emperor has no clothes. But you keep on obsessing on Meghan Markle's clothes. Royalass indeed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 219November 26, 2023 7:47 PM

R217 The Look of Love 😂

by Anonymousreply 220November 26, 2023 7:50 PM

You do realize that Kate, as working royal, dresses under a lot of wardrobe guidelines and restrictions. Meghan does not. Which makes Meghan's choices all the more abysmal, ridiculous, and plain bad.

by Anonymousreply 221November 26, 2023 9:00 PM

Meghan dresses like a 16 year old mall-rat most of the time, then when she has to dress for an occasion, she's entirely out of her league when it comes to making appropriate decisions.

by Anonymousreply 222November 26, 2023 9:12 PM

[quote]Saying one person is copying another wrt clothes is always nonsense.

It annoys me when I see those stories saying Kate or Meghan wore such and such in a "sweet nod to Diana." Diana was undoubtedly the most photographed woman in the world for years. Just because Diana once wore, say, a blue dress and one of her daughters-in-law did as well doesn't mean squat.

by Anonymousreply 223November 26, 2023 9:19 PM

Holy shit.

I dislike Markle, but I've always been fair to her with regard to anybody comparing her to Kate and her clothes hanger bodily dimensions that makes any garment look impeccable on her.

But Kate wanting to copy Meghan's dress sense? Bwahahahaha!

Too much.

What r221 said. Kate has to be conservative with garments. Unlike Markle, she will one day be Queen, she's the wife of the one-day UK monarch, and the mother of a future one.

With the exception of that recent Red Overload when Kate was helping to host the dignitaries of South Korea, she has superb restraint when it comes to choosing her garments.

Markle isn't in the same league as Kate.

When it comes to dressing, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy is idolized for her sense of minimalism and restraint.

Nobody ever points out, though, that, shrewdly (and I mean that word in its positive sense) CBK knew she had had every reason to not need excess texture draping her body- she was White, she was tall, she was blonde, and she had an accessory hanging off her arm know as JFK, Jr.

That canvas needed no embellishment.

Kate reminds me of Carolyn Bessette Kennedy in that way. She knows she doesn't need any superfluous details or texture when it comes to her garments. Add in money, tailoring and the best fabrics in the world and there you have it- one of the best-dressed women of Earth.

If it's true that Markle claims Kate wanted to copy her dress sense, that's truly hilarious. Markle doesn't even know to avoid horizontal stripes.

by Anonymousreply 224November 26, 2023 9:25 PM

Scoobie Doo called out by the Times for lying about his age. Claims he's had no work done.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 225November 26, 2023 9:41 PM


by Anonymousreply 226November 26, 2023 9:43 PM

There's a youtuber called "Ibble Dibble" who seems to know a lot about the fashion world and LA. She anayzed a video or photos of Meghan getting a dress ready - that awful red one emphasizing her back fat I think. She could see that it was at night and that Meghan had called the designers to her house.

She said that just isn't done - that they expect people to come to them at an appointed time. So anyway, her hypothesis is that they were pissed at her about this, and who knows what else with her bitchy bossy personality, so she thinks they decided that if she won't follow their norms (and likely won't take advice), they were perfectly happy to let her have her way and wear that dress and make a fool of herself.

by Anonymousreply 227November 27, 2023 3:45 AM

Kitty Duchess of Slag😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 228November 27, 2023 3:51 AM

r228 you know it's possible to not like the Royals and also be disgusted by H&M

by Anonymousreply 229November 27, 2023 4:21 AM

I think it's strange they don't take those children anywhere fun. There were pictures of Meghan at a farmer's market, my Mom used to always take us kids with her when she went.

by Anonymousreply 230November 27, 2023 8:44 AM

Maybe bringing the kids would take the spotlight off Megs?

by Anonymousreply 231November 27, 2023 11:15 AM

It's never too early to teach the kids how to manage a proper pap stroll

by Anonymousreply 232November 27, 2023 1:45 PM

I thought Scobie's jaw was bad, but the eyebrows are worse!

Scroll down at link to see the collapse of his face is complete!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 233November 27, 2023 8:38 PM

The Telegraph gave Scobie's new book one star and says:

“Hell hath no fury like a royal reporter scorned. Omid Scobie’s Endgame is billed as the real story of what has been going on inside the Palace walls. But what runs through its 400-odd pages is Scobie’s sense of burning indignation that he was shut out”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 234November 28, 2023 1:17 AM

So that's what this is all about! Our (cough) Royal Reporter got sidelined by William...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 235November 28, 2023 2:06 AM

^^^ The only real bombshell to me is the one about Princess Anne. I thought she stayed out of this mess. .. Oh, and I suppose the one about the shoelaces. But even that's more funny than anything else.

by Anonymousreply 236November 28, 2023 9:58 PM

Haha, I LOVE that William kept Scobie away from royal engagements! He's able to sense grifters.

by Anonymousreply 237November 29, 2023 12:06 AM

Charles' bespoke shoemaker comnented that his laces are round, not flat, and so are not ironed .

by Anonymousreply 238November 29, 2023 3:32 PM

I supposed you could iron round laces but it would not have any effect. Maybe Charles irons in the evening to relax?

by Anonymousreply 239November 29, 2023 10:59 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 240November 30, 2023 10:00 PM

Quelle Suprise!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 241December 3, 2023 6:48 AM

Did Scobie get a perm? And what's with his eyes had own? A change of pronouns, next?

by Anonymousreply 242December 3, 2023 9:09 AM


by Anonymousreply 243December 3, 2023 10:32 AM

I have seen horizontal scarring underneath the nose from a lift lip, and I think Obit has similar permanent scars on his eyelids. He kind of obscured the scars with his smoky eyeshadow, and has a full face of makeup besides.

by Anonymousreply 244December 3, 2023 10:44 PM

Sack this obsolete Crime Family.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 245December 4, 2023 12:38 AM

Imagine Scobie sans fard!

by Anonymousreply 246December 4, 2023 12:48 AM

He might actually look like a human sans fard.

by Anonymousreply 247December 4, 2023 3:32 AM

He might also look like a human with a bag over his head.

by Anonymousreply 248December 4, 2023 4:06 AM

Prince Harry must be devastated!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 249December 4, 2023 3:05 PM

Six court cases! Fanta Pubes/Old Ginger Bollocks needs to a hobby, job and life!

Who else would have time for such buffoonery?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 250December 5, 2023 9:51 AM

Needs to *get*

by Anonymousreply 251December 5, 2023 10:35 AM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!