Harry and Meghan slam ‘savage’ ‘Family Guy’ attack as an ‘outrageous slur’

Stop linking to the New York Post, all they ever do is print Republican lies

Owwwwwww my pussy hurts.

What fucking useless shitheads are these two, demanding to be taken more seriously and respected..

Seems to me the people who are really useless shithead are the media like the NYPOST who are making millions writing articles about them. Why are you British queens so obsessed with them? They are are not politicians, they are not making laws, they are not titans of industry. So they are like most actors trying to make a buck, big deal. Some of you need to get laid and let it go already.

R4 Why bring the British into this? The writers of Family Guy aren't British. The NY Post isn't British. The DLers posting about them aren't British.

I'm an actual Brit living in Britain and only ever hear anything about them from Americans on DL.

The DL is full of Brits obsessed with them. There are hundreds of threads about them. I am telling you, most Americans could give a rats ass about them. Totally indifferent because we are not wrapped up in the daily musings of the Monarchy. They are reserve by American standards if we are talking about celebrities.

R6 The posters obsessed with them are not British. British people are not 'wrapped up in the daily musings of the Monarchy', whatever that means. The obsessives are American.

If it quacks like a duck...

[quote] most Americans could give a rats ass about them

Could *NOT give a rat’s ass. People need to stop using this expression if they can’t even say it right and end up giving it the opposite meaning.

R9 oh fuck off twat. It can work either way.

[quote]The DL is full of Brits obsessed with them. There are hundreds of threads about them. I am telling you, most Americans could give a rats ass about them.

You have it backwards, R6. If you want to hear nothing about the lot of them, go to the UK. It will be a fucking very long wait to hear any friends or acquaintances or people on the street or in the pub say a word about the royal family.

But come to Data lounge and find a world of Anglophilia: tea at the Ritz, tea at Fortnum & Mason, scones, Harrod's food halls, people queued up to see the Royal Paintings Collection, any kind of royal palace, any royal stables, anything Downton Abbey-ish, the royal jewels, the changing of the guard, the "romantic" exile of Wallis and Edward, rehashed (again) 43 year old discussions about whether one's sympathies were with Charles Ryder or Sebastian Flight and the perfection of the casting...That's all stuff a subset of Americans lap up like a kitten does milk. People in the UK don't follow all these twee, thatched roof fantasies - it's the stuff of tourists.

The truth hurts...

R5

Keep your grubby Brit hands off them . They now belong to us

USA USA USA USA

We always had queens and Duke Ellington now we are happy to have our very own Royal couple. And we are keeping them . We are also keeping that cia woman that ran over and killed your motorcyclist.

USA USA USA USA.

Highly dubious.

That version can stay in my screen.

Lol, these fucking grifters stamping their feet and demanding to be taken seriously!

Can't their PR people drum up some sort of gala where they can give themselves a People Most Worthy of Respect award.

Btw, thought the South Park ep was way more scathing, yet they didn't say shit about that. Why has 'Family Guy' cut so deeply?

This is coasting into what called the “Streisand Effect” where they actually draw even more negative response to themselves by drawing attention to it.

Everyone is scared of South Park, r16. The show might not be as relevant as it once was, but only an idiot would fuck with Trey and Matt.

I would respect Harry a lot more if he would ditch the gold digger.

[quote]only an idiot would fuck with Trey and Matt.

And your point would be...?

[quote] oh fuck off twat. It can work either way.

No, it doesn’t work either way. If you stop to think about it “could care less” means you do care.

I'm afraid no matter how they would have handled the split with the Royals they would have been on the losing end of the stick. The very fact that they wanted something other than a Royal life made them sitting targets for the world media. Anything, no matter how big or small they did after the split was going to be picked apart in minute detail. IMO they should have never come to LA. Their plans were always far too grandiose. They should have stayed incommunicado for a few years, lived within their means rather than living a lifestyle that required them to scrape every shekel they could come up with to support it, and then once the hubbub died down start their philanthropic endeavors small, eschewing all media coverage, and built up slowly. I believe that would have made the public much more kind to them. The way they did things they made themselves a spectacle with all the huge money deals and people looked upon them as money hungry and crass.

But the damage is done. Their best bet at this point would be to leave the US and learn to live within their means. They undoubtedly have a fortune to fall back on if they'd stop spending like it's growing on trees. They could live wonderful lives back in the UK working for their charities. I doubt Meghan would go for that though. I believe she'll divorce him before she'll ever move back to the UK for good.

I think what it all boils down to is immaturity on both their parts.

Why would they be taken seriously? Why do they think that is a reasonable expectation? They are so strange.

In other words, they perform a desperate Teacake-like grasp for relevance and attention.

Harry just made an appearance, via videotape, at a charity, something to do with wounded vets. Tom Hanks was there and Bruce Springsteen performed so pretty A List for him. No mention of The Claw.

Fuck these two.

a pox on the Griffin house!

But they ARE spoiled brats! They are, Blanche!

I don't take the NY Post seriously.

It's fun to read if you read it, and know it, for what it is- a right- wing, agenda driven, pulled out their ass rag.

But the larger point remains. What is the point of the fame of the Sussexes?

To be fair, that could be asked about any famous person or couple, and, I think they have achieved one thing- they seem to be accepted, and travel in, the circles they want to be seen in, but, the question remains.

I'm no fan of Greydon Carter. He is, however, a qualified expert witness when it comes to assessing the rich and famous. Being the long-time editor of Vanity Fair magazine will do that for you.

He has openly remarked that Markle will dump Harry now that she's got the fame, title and sees a lane to keep climbing without him. Might not be soon, but one day.

I agree.

"You've had everything handed to you, but you claim your life is hard and written about it in your new book 'Waaagh'"

LOL

Celebrities always come out looking great when they go after parodies/satire/comedians. It really gets the sympathy of the common people

I think that’s been a given from the start. They aren’t the Duke and Duchess of Windsor type. It will happen when Megs has milked him for everything he has.

If they need any lessons in grifting they should call me.

Thanks, R28.

That's exactly the quote I thought of after reading this story.

R22 makes a lot of sense

This Royal couple , has fallen down so far from what they once were , almost as far as ESPN has

One of the threads about this couple on DL had a post that basically listed all that Harry has lost since marrying Meghan and moving to LA. Basically everything. His family, his friends, his culture, his comfort, his country. He must be miserable. When they finally divorce he will probably be relieved. I think that when he comes back home he will be embraced with open arms like the prodigal son.

Um, but they are entitled grifting whiners

[quote] “Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this and is desperate for a solution.

Yeah, that's Meghan.

[quote] I think that when he comes back home he will be embraced with open arms like the prodigal son.

Seriously? After everything he said on Oprah and put in his book about them?

Charles... maybe. The rest of them? No fucking way.

I meant the people of England who still support the monarchy more so than the family.

There was that great line in S1 of The Crown, where the Duke of Windsor says “In this family when you’re in, you’re never quite sure you’re in but when you’re out, there’s no doubt at all. You’re out.”

Harry can return, Charles (and only he) will forgive, the rest will tolerate him in small doses. He’ll pick up where he left off with a few friends, the ones who don’t run with William’s crowd in any case. It won’t be like before MM and he’ll have difficulty adjusting to that. Charles will need to set him up with something to keep him occupied.

R41 Absolutely no way.

If, when they chose to leave, they had deliberately flown under the radar for a year or two, and found a smaller, less expensive place to live, (NOT in an area they thought was important to high level Hollywood celebs) they would have been much more sought after by West Coast A listers. It's that group that I think Harry's wife wanted to be an adored addition to. After all, consider her giving wedding invitations to the Clooneys, for example, rather than more lowly members of her own family - that spoke volumes about where Mrs Harry's interest always was.

Then there was the jaw dropping episode at the Lion King premiere, where Harry blew off the long time invitation to a memorial for murdered Royal Marines (a patronage of his) to corral the head of Disney to suck up and put the bite on the man for a gig for Harry's wife.

Their ineptitude is stunning.

They just don't get it. Don't know how the game is played.

A smart person could have made it all work with a better understanding of how to behave, but H & M are sooo stupid that they threw it all away.

Joy...Rapture...Another thread on them!

How'd I miss this thread on Mr. and Mrs. Harry Mountbatten-Windsor of Montecito, CA, USA?

Spot On, "Family Guy!"

Just saw the second stringers of the Montecito branch of the Mountbatten-Windsors are once again trying to have it their way...not working as full-time members of the BRF, but still playing catchup with those working members!

Without snark, it's good when they highlight veterans and what not...But stop making it about yourselves, you dimwits!!!

Love this term for them..."Cosplay Royals."

[quote]“What’s hit them hardest and cuts the deepest of all is that it plays up the whole notion they’re self-entitled grifters or spoilt brats”

Gosh, whatever would give people that idea?

[quote]... 43 year old discussions about whether one's sympathies were with Charles Ryder or Sebastian Flight

Oh DEAR.

They’re so phoney. Everything is about their “brand”.

When was the last time you heard a senior media executive call any "celebrity" a 'fucking grifter'? Bill Simmons said this because, from personal experience, he knows this to be true. He said it publicly. No one objected to this statement. No one. Do you know why? Because that's what they are: fucking grifters. They're over. He'll go back to England; she'll continue grasping at a straws.

Yes but remember, Simmons is far from your typical media executive. I assume he was given the position when Spotify bought The Ringer.

He's known for shooting his mouth off.

^ You're right, he's not typical but evidently was involved enough in their Spotify deal to draw that conclusion. That kind of public shade is unusual - even for a guy shooting his mouth off. He said if he's drunk enough, he'll tell the whole story. I'm still waiting.

He’s in charge of Spotify podcasts, right?

He has firsthand experience with their work ethic, or lack thereof.

Listen, they are lightning rods and therefore their work gets sampled. Bill would have loved to work with them to find the right vehicles.

Harry is a pothead gamer who spends much of his time on PornHub jerking off to trannies. Meghan badgers him for sex all the time but he can't get it up during sex with her anymore.

R22 "I'm afraid no matter how they would have handled the split with the Royals they would have been on the losing end of the stick." And then you tell us how it might have been different:

"Their plans were always far too grandiose. They should have stayed incommunicado for a few years, lived within their means rather than living a lifestyle that required them to scrape every shekel they could come up with to support it, and then once the hubbub died down start their philanthropic endeavors small, eschewing all media coverage, and built up slowly. I believe that would have made the public much more kind to them. The way they did things they made themselves a spectacle with all the huge money deals and people looked upon them as money hungry and crass."

Had their post-royal choices been closer to your very sane advice, their story could be different. I agree. Unfortunately for them - but like manna from heaven for DL - they didn't. The public reception would have been much kinder if they did. I'm not sure they have could won everyone over as they've too often proven themselves to be repellent (her father, his book for starters), but they'd have had a better chance at acceptance with a more measured approach, the one they didn't take.

Not that either of them has ever heard of, much less read John Greenleaf Whittier but "For all sad words of tongue and pen, The saddest are these, 'It might have been.'

And now it's over: they're once again the punchline of an animated show and Harry's wife said she won’t be humiliated like this. "Won't be?" That train left the station a while ago.

Family Guy is still on?

What's brilliant is that Meghan is totally stuck in the 90s and early 2000s and the two shows which skewered her and Harry had their heyday in that era too, so to her it's probably even a bigger sting.

I'm quite disappointed that they never tried to sue South Park.

Who still watches family guy? She's a professional crybaby.

R57 It would probably be pointless. .. Has anyone ever been able to sue Southpark? .. As I recall, even Tom Cruise with the resources of Scino behind opted to not follow-through. .. Courts have ruled that satire and parody is protected.

Even Stewie wouldn't fuck her.

[quote]You have it backwards, [R6]. If you want to hear nothing about the lot of them, go to the UK. It will be a fucking very long wait to hear any friends or acquaintances or people on the street or in the pub say a word about the royal family.

Oh so those millions of people that stand in the streets during the Queen's Jubilee or the King's coronation are all Americans? Bitch Please.

WANTED : One Soul.

The castle has been stormed in many ways these days. People over being poor and watching what they can never have. I love reading comments from former Kartrashian fans who shame them on their social channels for their vapid greed and opulence.

To the Markles:

The shoe fits, sweeties.

R63 The Royals have been exposed for the greedy corrupt frauds they have always been.

R54 Is too deranged to realize none of her babbling makes sense unless you live her "Lady" Colin Campbell bizzarro world. Reality check dear : His Ladyship's name is George.

R1 That’s not true. They are a tabloid paper with a conservative slant for sure. They aren’t serious journalism but I do appreciate the Post for posting serious crime stories that sometimes the mainstream media won’t touch because of political correctness.

R61

"Millions"??

The people you see camping out overnight for Jubilee events or dressed head-to-toe in Union Flags are not representative of the British public. They appear in news footage because they're so unusual. Those news reports about roads being closed off for street parties etc are because those events are unusual and not something we see very often.

On a day-to-day basis we don't have blanket coverage of the Royal Family and their comings and goings. The Daily Mail website isn't really representative of the British media in general - it's barely even representative of the actual physical Daily Mail newspaper.

The kind of coverage H&M get on DL is insane compared to what I hear of them here in the UK. There's like a collective national eyeball here when it comes to them. It might have an element of "omg they pulled out of the Royal Family/they insulted the Queen etc" to it, but there's no real interest in them here. It veers more toward a passive aggressive pointed indifference, which is something we Brits are very good at.

*eyeball = eyeroll

[quote]Oh so those millions of people that stand in the streets during the Queen's Jubilee or the King's coronation are all Americans? Bitch Please.

No, R61, of course the majority were British, but there's a difference in using a holiday to see an event that may not occur again in one's lifetime.

I have friends and acquaintances whom I've never known to discuss the royal family beyond the rare funny allusion to their foibles. I know they walked to the coronation route or stood in line to view the casket because they posted an image in Instagram. They went out of curiosity for the marking of a time. They didn't bring home bags full of tea towels and coronation mugs.

Of course there's a contingent of British people who do revere the royal family and the hats and gloves and gowns and carriages and jewels and traditions "and the history," but that's largely sentimental lonelyhearts. My point is that Americans and American gay men go apeshit over this stuff in a way that few Brits do.

The royal family would certainly be a.much leaner organization were it not for the fact that it's benefit to tourism revenues outweighs its costs. The big interest in the family lies outside the borders of the U.K.

In his own words (or the ghost writer’s), she played him. Their first meeting, he was late, she benignly forgave him but oops, she had another “appointment” so she left shortly thereafter. No one had ever done that before. The temerity! The audacity! He was hooked. And he puts this in his memoir as some kind of incredible, wondrous meeting when actually it was a very calculated ruse. He was just too dumb to see it but everyone else does.

Yikes ! Waity Katie hit the wall. Hard. That vile family sucks the life right outa you. Harry was smart to dump those vampires.

R70 Then why do you continue to finance their circus? Disingenuous.

Harry should dump Meghan and go back to servicing British soldier cock.

[quote]My point is that Americans and American gay men go apeshit over this stuff in a way that few Brits do.

I have known hundreds of gay men in my lifetime in the U.S., NONE of them ever talk about "the royals". In fact the last time it was a thing with gay men was way back with Diana. After that, the Royals were dead to us. And I am talking about old and younger gays. They do not care.

R73 is too stupid for this place.

Really?

The tourism dollars generated from the existence of the BRF exceeds the cost to the UK public coffers.

Now cue the inevitable rush to point out that France generates tourism without a living Royal family.

For whatever reason that smarter minds than the one I have can present, there is a reason for the difference.

Even the most mild criticism or satire is the MOST outrageous slur to these two nitwits.

“Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this"

That horse left the barn a while ago...

Actually the horse lives in Buckingham Palace with the King.

Their brand. Their truth. Their journey. Now all they need is some deep healing!

They make themselves look like even bigger idiots by reacting to things like this. Surely if you’re in the public eye, where anybody is fair game, you should never respond openly to jibes and jokes like that. Lest we forget the Streisand effect.

I think we have all had sufficient when it comes to the RF. With the Queen Elizabeth gone, it feels like a ragtime group of misfits without a leader. Charles isn't cutting it and the kids are all stupid. No one cares anymore.

r18 except it is Family Guy not South Park.

What we adore about our Prince and Princess of Wales is their absolute sincerity. Blimey authenticity is written all over Their Royal Highnesses faces. They really care! Unlike those phony arse Harkles.

R76 Royalass too stupid to see a shell game con when you're paying for one. Make it simple for a simpleton.

R75 fuck off trying to make yourself the self appointed spokesperson for every gay person in the UK. Plenty of gay people like the royals, just like plenty of straight people like them.

^^ should read USA

R86 Spot on . Poofs appreciate a good drag queen when we see one.

Oh look we found on in the US who cares, hey look everyone r86 is an American who gives a rats ass about the Royals. Unicorn mystery solved. No let the Brit obsession with their Royals continue.

R83, I was responding to an earlier post. The one I referred to.

Am I the only one that thinks King Charles does not look like a king? He looks like a conservative banker trying to pull off a look that does not work on him. Just always seems awkward in the Royal cos play gear.

The royals are all useless parasites.

[quote]it feels like a ragtime group of misfits

If the royal family had a soundtrack, it wouldn't be ragtime.

R89 I'm interested to know what is your first language?

I've been reading the various BRF threads for a long time, and I'm American. We had a huge influx of posters after Harry and Meghan married, but we were here long time before that. But I think there's been a huge loss of interest in them after all their revelations. There are only so many ways to describe the Sussexes as work=shy slags. I still admire many of the other British Royals, and those of other nations. But DL isn't delivering much contact about the Royals lately, so I stick to the other topics where I can offer some content.

R95" I still admire many of the other British Royals"

Why?

Truly curious . Beside an accident of birth what qualities do these people posses that make them admirable to you?

Our lovely Princess of Wales exhibits the charismatic engaging qualities that make her so beguiling to children.

Ok, r96, Here-

You're so much deeper than the rest of us.

Satisfied?

Sheesh.

[quote]Meghan said she won’t be humiliated like this and is desperate for a solution.

Bitch, stop opening your mouth if you don’t want to be humiliated.

R98 Not satisfied just confirmed in my option that Royalists are cultists . Brit version of Trumptards.

Useless white people problems.

And yet, r100. here you

In my more than 20 years on the DL, it's weird, but I always managed to ignore topics that didn't interest me by scrolling past them, or, I didn't want to find common cause with trolls.

All of which led me into many battles with Trumptards.

Fuck you for comparing me to a Trumper.

I happen to find the Royals fun to watch and comment on.

If that upsets your delicate superiority, so fucking what.

here you are^

Getting a little impatient waiting for their next PR debacle. It usually happens like clockwork and I rely on DL to let me know when it does.

R104, have you seen this candid photo of Meghan taken by a fan recently? It's not very flattering.

Ozempic face is to be expected. It's the eyebrows that are the most puzzling.

Yikes, R105! Looks like the side of her face has caved in.

Wow, at her teeth at r105, now I know why they say your teeth should never be paler that the whites of your eyes! Hideous!

And her eyebrows look curiously hairy and collapsed.

He looks retarded in this photo.

And her eyebrows were completely different then.

W O W Meg's Ozempic-face is shocking, and the sun damage is off the charts. I guess she thinks she looks good?

Can she not afford to get her brows tended to? Yikes!

Her face looks very masculine in that awful pic.

[quote]Can she not afford to get her brows tended to? Yikes!

Probably not. She’s blown through a ton of money.

Yesterday H G Tudor did an entire episode on why Meghan's fingernail polish was chipped. Too many fires to put out that she's overwhelmed, very last minute heads-up by someone searching for an appearance for them who finally found one, + maybe alcoholism. I'm hoping it's the latter.

Mainly I'm disturbed that he said in that video or another one yesterday that the following were all official narcissists: Angelina Jolie, Mariah Carey, Megan Fox, Chelize Theron, and even sweet little Taylor Fucking Swift! Well I never!!

R108-R113 See the Derangers have finally pulled a way from your 3rd breakfasts and are seething between snacks. Hot dang! Nothing like trolling you cows on a rainy day. Bon appetite petit cherie

This woman need serious mental help.🤪

Tudor did a couple videos sometime ago on the Pitt/Jolie court case. But he didn't continue. Too bad.

Someone should rip into her about her fake tan. She must use a similar one to Klangerine.

So many pictures I see of Harry now, such as R117, he has this expression of slowly dawning “oh, shit, I’ve ruined my life, what will I do?” That is not a happy man. Meg, of course, constantly has her fake Hollywood smile plastered over her insincere face.

True, r118.

Plus, he's ugly. Hard to believe Diana was his mother.

He looks like a squirrel storing nuts in his cheeks in that photo.

And under his chin, r120

Who'd Harry get that ski-slope nose from?

R118 So many pictures I see of William now, such as [R122], he has this expression of slowly dawning “oh, shit, I’ve ruined my life, what will I do?” That is not a happy man.😂

^ Willy's thinking "Who the fuck took down the fence! "

Hewitt.

R123 I don't see how William's done anything to ruin his life. He's basically just living the life of his pre-ordained destiny.

If you want to believe William's not entirely happy, fine. Who is? But he hasn't taken any dramatic action to alter his life the way Harry has.

William is doing his duty, Harry is not. You don't have to like what you do, but at least William is being a responsible adult.

R123 Is just a stupid childish cunt trying and failing to be clever.

R127 Spot on! It's only a matter of time before Harry realizes what a miserable life he's made for himself in the USA and comes crawling back to the warmth of his loving family in the always sunny United Kingdom of Great Britain.

^ Yeah looks like he's in living hell.😂

Scroll down at link to see Haz brimming with happiness!

Archie and Lilibet are also fed up and have been secretly texting Grandad to rescue them and bring them home.

Harry radiating joy.

Again.

When you think of it, it really would be intolerable for all parties concerned if the Harkles decided to land in on Christmas. Of course Meghan would have to bring an entourage of nanny's who would be entirely unfitted to walk in to a Royal Palace with established rules and traditions. Imagine the Harkles trying to have everything 'their way' with both the Palace staff and their own 'civilian' American staff. And from what we've heard both Meghan and Harry are not hands on parents (unless of course there is a photographer in the room). Meghan probably wouldn't know how to get through the day with her kids were she left to her own. They made their bed, now they can just marinate in it for the rest of their lives.

Meghan would want a 12 vehicle motorcade to whisk them from the Heathrow to Sandringham, lol

Meghan is terrified of her in-laws. She's especially terrified of Catherine. No chance she's 'hanging' with them for any other reason than a major funeral.

How can someone so ugly, nasty, thirsty and stupid be a prince? He undermines the concept of monarchy just by existing and using his title.

[quote] Meghan would want a 12 vehicle motorcade to whisk them from the Heathrow to Sandringham, lol

Complete, of course, with the “near catastrophic” Bond-esque car chase.

She’s epitome of self-important.

LOL the Palace released the Sandringham guest list and they are not on it. Nice try Harkles!

"How can someone so ugly, nasty, thirsty and stupid be a prince? He undermines the concept of monarchy just by existing and using his title". Do tell R137.

The Duke of Sussex is preforming with the dignity ,intelligence and the charm of his grandmother the working Royal roles Willy seems incapable of doing without generating gales of laughter. The Windsors chucked their only STAR. Silly clots.

"Meghan is terrified of her in-laws. She's especially terrified of Catherine."

Who the fuck wouldn't be!

Man, these attempts to ridicule William and Kate are pitiful and lame.

Ridicule away at them but at least do it with wit and cleverness, or don’t bother.

I love Meghan pretending not to watch herself on the screen!

[quote]Megs has milked him

Pics please.

Shocking: Meghan and Harry make a public appearance at the same time a state visit to the UK from the President of South Korea is about to begin. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. Though Kate today was like, hold my beer bitch!

These two fugs phony creepiness speaks for itself. They are massive flops in all their obviously staged media whoring. If they are the "future" The House of Windsor is royally fucked.

Why are all these anti Meghan posts from Muricans? Your not fooling anyone . We see ya bot.

Whatever is she doing in the video at R145?

She looks ridiculous.

No wonder she had such a lackluster Hollywood "career" if that is an example of her talent.

Like man like what makes you think we're not like English dudes? We are also like not like white . We be like black people. Yeah we be like english black people. And we like still HATE the bitch. Its all TRUE.

Dumb and Drab are nothing if not predictable. No wonder Megsie showed up to a hockey game of all places wearing about $300K worth of jewelry. "Look everyone! I'm THRIVING!!! Meeeeeeee!!!"

Middleton will always be the " party planner's daughter".😂

What they really need to do is stage another low speed car chase through the streets of Manhattan being pursued by the paparazzi that they hired to photograph them after another fake award ceremony where Megan wins another phoney “woman of excellence” award, that they also paid for. Because that really worked out so well for them.

(That was when I finally gave up on these two twats.)

R154 sums it up perfectly

What do they think savage means, I wonder.

Man like Maggot & Dimwit could like never dream of being like as crazy ass in LOVE as William and his Catherine!!!. IN THEIR DREAMS bitches!!!!

^ Two absolutely miserable people. Reminds me of Charles and Diana at the end. Funny how history repeats its self with this dysfunctional family.

Kate’s choices in attire have been impeccable.

Until now.

I understand the necessity and tradition of wearing the state color of the country you’re officially hosting.

Here, however, the combined oversize hat, asymmetrical bow across the chest, caped dress, all presented in bold red, no relief from it, is too much.

Speaking of Kate, we are finally seeing some of the previously little seen baubles from the Royal Vault.

Since the major bling surfaces at State Dinners and Diplomatic Receptions, finally something different for the dinner for the President of South Korea.

Supposedly this tiara has been in the vault for almost a century.

.

^Hi Meg!!! How's the Hollywood takeover coming? Going to crash anymore red carpets again? Can't wait!

I’m indifferent to tiaras, but that one Kate is wearing at r160 was worth bringing out of mothballs.

It’s a dazzler without being too much.

Outrageous slur? Really? They drew Markle with a waist and omitted her stick legs as well as Haz's moobs and gut.

R159 Katie's "state color" is peach.

Funny column in the Telegraph.

So apparently the Canuks game that H&M attended was meant to be a fundraiser night for the Autism Society of British Columbia. There is a rumour going around that Harry supplanted a child who was supposed to drop the puck that night.

Hi management team must really have to be beating the bushes if the best appearance they can get is to fly him to another country to drop a puck. He obviously got no payment for that.

Showing Harry drop a puck juxtaposed to the Queen doing the same thing begs the question, if Harry didn't want to be a working royal any longer, then why is he doing things like working royals do?

Great question r168. He’s doing some weird shadow royal duties. Nobody gives a fuck about any of that in the US, not sure about Canada. Maybe they’re testing the waters there

Harry should apply for a job as a Zamboni driver.

R170, he'd struggle to stack shelves in WalMart. Anything he does, he'd want his security detail in attendance, too.

The Sussexes popularity has dropped considerably, even DL has moved on to other targets. Omid Scobie with an assist from the couple is trying to keep the feud alive. Sources close to the Susseses says Meghan would never go back to the UK because it's a soap opera and Kate Middletown is obsessed with Meghan. This is a lead story in the DM and is supposedly carried in People Magazine. I don't see how this tidbit benefits Markle.

Hilarious take on the Princess of Wales. So, so, so like the narcissistic wife of Harry.

His Royal Highness Prince Peggy the hamburger flipper,curry cook and piazza deliverer twit.😂

Princess of Bulimia is so irrelevant to her in-laws they hid her behind the candelabra. All her scheming for this. Pathetic anorexic slag.

^ Below the salt.😂

[quote] Kate Middletown is obsessed with Meghan.

Most outrageous projection since "I'm not a puppet. You're the puppet"

Candelabra Kate: like Diana/Meghan, if you become more popular than blood Royals, you're shut down. Meghan wasn't a bully, liar or schemer: she was simply too popular. Now Kate is getting a taste the legendary Royals old git jealousy. She earned it.

Face it Klan Grans:Your dream Royal is nothing more than a jumped up aging bougie mediocrity whose own husband won't even shag her.

How fat is her neck?

Stop trying to make that happen r179

It lost all bite months ago

Duchess of Bite😂

^ That slag is rabid.

R167 We're you born a stupid or do you have to practice?

Meghan's spray-tanning is pathetic.

R180 Now there are two royal racists....this what, the third time they've changed their story?!

Does anyone actually take Mr & Mrs Sussex seriously at all any more? On any topic? At any time?

And people are literally shoving Harry's wife off the area where photographers get their pictures on the red carpet.

Neither of them appear to have anything to contribute.

Apparently Harry took the place of an autistic kid who was supposed to drop the puck that the hockey game the Harkles attended. Haz just had to soak up some attention while duplicating something his grandmother did so that he could cosplay working royal. Pathetic.

They are ALL bloody racist. No only racists but scrounger vampires. Keep groveling and handing over your money.Royalass are really thick dolts..

R188, love how he had to be prompted to drop the puck, he was so busy showboating and soaking up the attention.

He's such a douche.

How can those grifter Harkles not BEG to come CRAWLING BACK to the glorious United Kingdom without our loving ROYAL FAMILY they are living in bloody HELL! We feel sorry for them!!!

In the not too distant past excerpts from Scobie's latest book would have resulted in a 600 post thread. There's r/Saint Meghan Markle on reddit but there's too much vitriol and not enough of the bitchy humor of DL.

Derangers have no humor the are just psychotic bitches.

Lame that he took a kid's place to drop the puck. Not cool.

R194 Murican racist Trumptard . We see you tiny.

R192 The fact that there isn't a dozen active threads about H&M on DL anymore is a sign of their increasing irrelevancy. Scobie's book is certainly not making waves, it's barely causing ripples.

^ Actually thinks DL threads are a sigh of relevancy😂.

Scobie's cosmetic choices are most unfortunate.

As could be expected, Scobie now claims there are two royal racists but still doesn’t name them.

The Harkles don't seem to be getting the fact hat the castle drawbridge is up as far as they are concerned, and they're standing on the other side of the moat throwing eggs at the palace walls.

The Royal Family is running perfectly well without them, and they are completely and totally irrelevant to the entire monarchy. King Charles just has to trot out some kind of platitude about them every once in a while, which is easy enough to do.

You know Scobie wants us to believe the "royal racists" are William and Kate. The venom directed at them is over the top and doesn't help the tattered reputations of the Sussexes.

The only benefit I can think of is the Sussexes plan another "documentary" on Netflex or this will be expanded in Meghan's book.

I can't think of any celebrity who built a career on grievances.

Scathing review in NYT:

“Readers hoping for a death blow of gossip will be disappointed. We’ve heard it before”

“hard not to find Scobie’s dire predictions a tad hyperbolic.”

“devoted to setting the record straight on petty slights against the Sussexes”

Scathing review in NYT:

“Readers hoping for a death blow of gossip will be disappointed. We’ve heard it before”

“hard not to find Scobie’s dire predictions a tad hyperbolic.”

“devoted to setting the record straight on petty slights against the Sussexes”

[quote]Scobie obliquely accuses [Kate] — presented as cold and lacking in self-assurance — of copying Meghan’s effortless dress sense

MY SIDES!

[quote]copying Meghan’s effortless dress sense

effortless indeed, 'just send me the most expensive dress in the collection, I don't need it fitted'

What you deranged loons can't comprehend is hating Meghan Markle is a multi million dollar industry. It will never stop because too many people make money off of it.

Harkles critics accuse them of being money-hungry careerists, that's hilarious coming from sycophants to hereditary tax sucking grifters. 'Working Royals" is such a blatant scam that only a dolt would fall for it.

^ Their teeth have never looked better!

My gooood, Megzie has hit the wall so hard she splattered onto it!! She looks like shit, oh my god! First, she has aged TERRIBLY. Like super old looking. Secondly, her fake tan is so bad and uneven, is she trying to pass as black once again? The skin is hanging off her face, obviously lost too much weight too quickly. The eyebrows I can't even talk about. Her entire face has changed completely... Yet again!! And the ridiculous shoving of her pinky ring into the camera made me choke on my cabernet!

Pass me a glass and let's boo and hiss together! Hating her has such a satisfying feel. It's not often you find such a deliciously hateable muse. Amber? Kevin Spacey?

R209 We know what you're choking on Tiny.

R207 says "Working Royals" is such a blatant scam that only a dolt would fall for it."

Statista polling shows that almost two-thirds of the UK's citizenry must be dolts as that's how many support the Royal Family. A bit more than a quarter would prefer an elected head of state. Likewise polling about King Charles showed that as of August 2023, approximately 60 percent of people in Great Britain had a positive opinion of King Charles III, compared with 32 percent who had a negative opinion.

Meghan's supporters here can't speak to facts but they do entertain themselves (and us!) posting childish pictures of themselves here. That's OK: they're a minority on DL and in the United Kingdom.

LMAO I love how Google presents Her Royal Duchesty the American Actress, behold and guffaw!

Kate wanted to copy Meghan's dress sense??? As if we needed any more proof that Scabies wrote his book with the help of Duchess D-list. The only way Kate would ever copy Meghan is if she was in search of a costume for Halloween

I don’t think Meghan’s clothes are bad choices, it’s the way she wears them. She almost always goes wrong with fit and often with suitability for the occasion, her figure, and the weather. Sometimes she seems like she is just trying to wear money, and that’s tacky.

But I think I like more of her daytime outfits than Kate’s. NOT the way they fit her or the locations or occasions she wears them for, but I like them. They are a little more modern and youthful. I prefer her monochrome top and pants outfits with an oversize coat to Kate’s more closely tailored coat dresses or her day dresses with the ever so slightly too high waists and old-fashioned right at the knee hemlines.

Kate definitely looks better almost all the time. But as far as the actual clothes go, I prefer Meghan’s.

Saying one person is copying another wrt clothes is always nonsense. Certain things get popular or suit an occasion and many people choose to wear them.

You cannot POSSIBLY claim that you like anything La Meghera is wearing, R215!!! (quite proud of that moniker I came up with, tbh)

No sane person, unless they were paid to troll would be outraged by Harry telling his own story, but not mind the Windsors fleecing their citizens after they die. While claiming the money went to charity the phony royal grifters funneling it into BRF property empire valued at 12 billion pounds. Accident of birth scroungers. Royalist = Cultist.

R217, are you paid to be here??

74 million Americans thought Trump was doing a great job but at least they had a vote. Your poll results are less than moot. Charles is a feckless corrupt wanker and everyone including his Mummy knew it. Your emperor has no clothes. But you keep on obsessing on Meghan Markle's clothes. Royalass indeed.

R217 The Look of Love 😂

You do realize that Kate, as working royal, dresses under a lot of wardrobe guidelines and restrictions. Meghan does not. Which makes Meghan's choices all the more abysmal, ridiculous, and plain bad.

Meghan dresses like a 16 year old mall-rat most of the time, then when she has to dress for an occasion, she's entirely out of her league when it comes to making appropriate decisions.

[quote]Saying one person is copying another wrt clothes is always nonsense.

It annoys me when I see those stories saying Kate or Meghan wore such and such in a "sweet nod to Diana." Diana was undoubtedly the most photographed woman in the world for years. Just because Diana once wore, say, a blue dress and one of her daughters-in-law did as well doesn't mean squat.

Holy shit.

I dislike Markle, but I've always been fair to her with regard to anybody comparing her to Kate and her clothes hanger bodily dimensions that makes any garment look impeccable on her.

But Kate wanting to copy Meghan's dress sense? Bwahahahaha!

Too much.

What r221 said. Kate has to be conservative with garments. Unlike Markle, she will one day be Queen, she's the wife of the one-day UK monarch, and the mother of a future one.

With the exception of that recent Red Overload when Kate was helping to host the dignitaries of South Korea, she has superb restraint when it comes to choosing her garments.

Markle isn't in the same league as Kate.

When it comes to dressing, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy is idolized for her sense of minimalism and restraint.

Nobody ever points out, though, that, shrewdly (and I mean that word in its positive sense) CBK knew she had had every reason to not need excess texture draping her body- she was White, she was tall, she was blonde, and she had an accessory hanging off her arm know as JFK, Jr.

That canvas needed no embellishment.

Kate reminds me of Carolyn Bessette Kennedy in that way. She knows she doesn't need any superfluous details or texture when it comes to her garments. Add in money, tailoring and the best fabrics in the world and there you have it- one of the best-dressed women of Earth.

If it's true that Markle claims Kate wanted to copy her dress sense, that's truly hilarious. Markle doesn't even know to avoid horizontal stripes.

Scoobie Doo called out by the Times for lying about his age. Claims he's had no work done.

HAHAHAHAHA R225

There's a youtuber called "Ibble Dibble" who seems to know a lot about the fashion world and LA. She anayzed a video or photos of Meghan getting a dress ready - that awful red one emphasizing her back fat I think. She could see that it was at night and that Meghan had called the designers to her house.

She said that just isn't done - that they expect people to come to them at an appointed time. So anyway, her hypothesis is that they were pissed at her about this, and who knows what else with her bitchy bossy personality, so she thinks they decided that if she won't follow their norms (and likely won't take advice), they were perfectly happy to let her have her way and wear that dress and make a fool of herself.

Kitty Duchess of Slag😂

r228 you know it's possible to not like the Royals and also be disgusted by H&M

I think it's strange they don't take those children anywhere fun. There were pictures of Meghan at a farmer's market, my Mom used to always take us kids with her when she went.

Maybe bringing the kids would take the spotlight off Megs?

It's never too early to teach the kids how to manage a proper pap stroll

I thought Scobie's jaw was bad, but the eyebrows are worse!

Scroll down at link to see the collapse of his face is complete!

The Telegraph gave Scobie's new book one star and says:

“Hell hath no fury like a royal reporter scorned. Omid Scobie’s Endgame is billed as the real story of what has been going on inside the Palace walls. But what runs through its 400-odd pages is Scobie’s sense of burning indignation that he was shut out”

So that's what this is all about! Our (cough) Royal Reporter got sidelined by William...

^^^ The only real bombshell to me is the one about Princess Anne. I thought she stayed out of this mess. .. Oh, and I suppose the one about the shoelaces. But even that's more funny than anything else.

Haha, I LOVE that William kept Scobie away from royal engagements! He's able to sense grifters.

Charles' bespoke shoemaker comnented that his laces are round, not flat, and so are not ironed .

I supposed you could iron round laces but it would not have any effect. Maybe Charles irons in the evening to relax?

Quelle Suprise!

Did Scobie get a perm? And what's with his eyes had own? A change of pronouns, next?

*eyeshadow*

I have seen horizontal scarring underneath the nose from a lift lip, and I think Obit has similar permanent scars on his eyelids. He kind of obscured the scars with his smoky eyeshadow, and has a full face of makeup besides.

Sack this obsolete Crime Family.

Imagine Scobie sans fard!

He might actually look like a human sans fard.

He might also look like a human with a bag over his head.

Prince Harry must be devastated!

Six court cases! Fanta Pubes/Old Ginger Bollocks needs to a hobby, job and life!

Who else would have time for such buffoonery?

Needs to *get*