[quote] and he was there telling me it was all Bill Clinton's fault.
That's interesting and somewhat expected, but what's even more interesting is that this blame game didn't take hold. As I wrote at R3, the problem with trying to blame Clinton was that his administration had a bin Laden task force set up and running in what would become Homeland Security with dozens of agents and several big names at the CIA (including director Tenet) involved who would (and did) vehemently protest any such blaming. Recall Richard Clarke's "hair on fire" testimony in which he accurately laid the blame at Bush's feet — and was summarily politically exiled.
9/11 was in no way Bill Clinton's fault. Let's just admit and confirm this from the outset. After the 1993 WTC bombing, his administration knew the towers were a target and did the appropriate thing to protect the homeland; it was Bush and Cheney that disbanded the task force and did so with some attitude, telling reporters that they thought Clinton's obsession with bin Laden was a waste of time and resources when we had "a real enemy" in Saddam Hussein (who was a brutal dictator and a bad person, but no threat to the US as was shown after we spent US$Trillions going after him). The Bush administration's obsession with Hussein was, in fact, the real problem, and the irony is that Hussein himself offered to leave Iraq and take Uday and Qusay with him for the paltry sum of $2 billion (IIRC), but that was no way to make military contractors rich so of course the Bushies said "No way! We must drain the US treasury into [italic]our[/italic] pockets!"
I always try to stick to the facts about 9/11 and avoid all of the wild conspiracy theories because they are just that, theories. There are factual details that can't be overlooked, however: the company that Dick Cheney ran between his government service as Ronald Reagain's DefSec (oh gosh, no malfeasance there!) and naming himself Bush's VP was running Halliburton, the company that had lost a major case and was being held responsible to remove the asbestos they'd used building the towers, to the tune of US$2 billion (the cleanup effort was barely under way and is responsible for many of the rumors that went around trying to claim that the inspectors and early work performed that fueled some conspiracy that the towers' collapse was a controlled demolition and utter nonsense).
Then there's the connection between the Bush and bin Laden families who are co-founders and owners of the Carlyle Group, a private investment house. Of course, we can't forget that after shutting down the airspace over the entire country stranding US citizens across the globe, the FAA was instructed by the White House to allow a 747 loaded with members of the bin Laden family to take off and leave US airspace unhindered. And tying up the Bush family's protection of bin Laden, there's the fact that we had Osama cornered in Tora Bora and the Bush White House issued a stand down order letting him escape to Pakistan.
And finally, there's the fact that Bush and Cheney both refused to testify under oath to the 9/11 Commission.
What remains astounding to me is that the country was redirected away from bin Laden and toward Saddam Hussein (by DIck Cheney who suggested as early as about 10:45 that fateful morning was to blame for the attacks — completely baseless and without merit). What then followed should be the subject of a thorough investigation as we know for fact that the Bush Administration lied about WMD, sending Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice to testify in front of the UN with the shakiest of evidence that the real professionals in national security knew and said was bullshit from the moment the Bushies put it out there.
As in all matters, when the Republicans accuse it is really a confession, so when they poopooed the Clinton obsession over the real threat — bin Laden —and instead focused on their obsession with Hussein, we should have known there was more to the story.