Shrill “Brown Queer Woman” Attacks Buttigieg Children, Gets Slammed for It

So called "queers" love to hate in gay men.

Girls, you're both curated.

He's everything she snarked about, she's got that impenetrable holier than thou snideness of the left. I hope they feud for years. It will be wildly entertaining.

Sorry, the "enlightened" left.

I do think they decided to have kids to make Pete look more relatable when he runs for President again.

[quote] She is a co-founder, with Ryan Conrad, of the radical queer editorial collective Against Equality, and the Policy Director of the Chicago queer radical collective Gender JUST

Yeah, no.

More exhaustion from the link @R5

[quote] Nair’s work emerges from an anti-racist, anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist and abolitionist perspective but she is also critical of the banal form of identity politics that suffuses most woke left writing. She can lay claim to several identities—queer, disabled, brown, housing-precarious, female, vaguely foreign, a woman with terorist hair, a crazy cat lady, and others she may have forgotten but chooses not to use to justify her arguments.

She's a Reddit reactionary's idea of an intellectual.

R6 holy shit. How do these people not realize they're walking parodies?

So basically, she's not house trained. One of the people from the edges of life, wildly resentful, who turned her resentment into equababble that nobody listens to, not even the equally outraged at the weekly vegan and vituperate potluck

R8, she clearly prides herself on being "radical".

R7, that is why I hate a lot of self-described "queer" activists.

[quote]Nair’s work emerges from an anti-racist, anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist and abolitionist perspective but she is also critical of the banal form of identity politics that suffuses most woke left writing. She can lay claim to several identities—queer, disabled, brown, housing-precarious, female, vaguely foreign, a woman with terorist hair, a crazy cat lady, and others she may have forgotten but chooses not to use to justify her arguments.

What do you want to bet that was not written by a third party?

She's not gay. She's always had heterosexual relationships. She's a far-right loon who thinks calling herself "queer" shields her from being labeled a homophobe, which she absolutely is.

Housing-precarious?

R12, cut the crap.

So she's not a lefty? Then the she proves it. The political spectrum isn't a line, it's a circle, where the extreme left and extreme right stand shoulder to shoulder, not at opposite ends.

She really hates gay men.

And.

And.

She doxxes people.

Does this person know whatI have to endure as a wife and the mother of these children?

My Peter is always off on his Infrastructure Fact Finding trips with that tramp assistant t Trace. I am essentially a single mother!

You try breastfeeding two brats at once! My breasts are pendulous, and now they’re to my knees!

You try dealing with the snickering from the other rich bitch mothers in Kindercare, when you arrive at the school in a shirt covered in breast milk and baby puke, driving a ‘96 Subaru held together by duct tape, because your cheapskate husband refuses to buy you a new minivan, while they’re in a Volvo wagon and a J Crew twinset!

You try dealing with that passive aggressive monster Mother Buttigieg, who makes sure to let you know you’re too lazy and fat to be married to her son, as well as a bad cook and homemaker!

MY CASSEROLE WON BLUE RIBBON AT THE IOWA STATE FAIR MOTHER BUTTIGIEG!

And now this…person has the nerve to suggest this was a tactic to improve Peter’s image?!?! Sweetums, if I knew it would be like this I would have told Peter to adopt a couple of French Bulldogs instead!

I just don’t know how many more insults I can endure! I am going to retire to my she shed with a Pepperidge Farm coconut cake and a bottle of Barefoot wine and let these brats fend for themselves!

[quote] She didn’t like Chasten’s book, so she wrote about how their marriage is surely a scam, and they curated their biracial babies to meet some phony narrative, and the two are too white and too gay for Pete to ever win the presidency.

This doesn't sound different from the detractors here on DL.

He very mildly chastised her and now she's shrieking that he called for a pile-on?

Cuckoo attention-whore woman.

I often wonder when people like that emerge from obscurity, what, if anything, constitutes a good and acceptable world?

Ooh, Pepperidge Farm coconut cake. That puts me in the mood for a low quality nostalgia filled binge.

Also, fuck all breeder-queers right in their ears. Heteros calling themselves queer is incredibly offensive. At least to me, a person who was called queer (among other things) from first grade onward.

Standard, run of the mill kook.

I'm still laughing at

[quote]a woman with terorist hair

Yasmin seems like she'd be a real guest-favorite at parties. 🙄

[quote] He very mildly chastised her and now she's shrieking that he called for a pile-on?

R22 Just me, but I wouldn't even characterize his response as a mild chastising. 1.) He included a verbatim snarky quote from her review. 2.) He responded by commenting, "Not sure how this is a review of my book. You don't like it, fine. I'm ok with criticism." 3.) Then he added, "Leave my kids out of it." Personally, I don't consider the, "Leave my kids out of it," remark a 'chastising.'

It also helps Chasten's cause that this is all he's said, and self-identified crazy cat lady Yasmin is the one who keeps resurfacing with new, increasingly bizarre, and slightly violent/menacing tweets.

[quote] "Nair warned, 'If you’re a professional anything — a writer, a professor, a copywriter, anyone at all — and you sling mud at someone who makes her living by writing by making claims that are unsubstantiated, be prepared to have that sword nick you pretty hard.'”

Make no mistake, Yasmin chose this metaphor deliberately, knowing she's on the badly losing end of a pathetic argument and to lash out from the corner she backed herself into.

R16, her hatred for gay men is palpable. I also have no idea wtf she is talking about. In my experience, gay men are no more classist than heteros.

[quote] Nair received her PhD from Purdue in 2000. She has worked as an adjunct instructor, a beat reporter, columnist, and journalist for Windy City Times and Clamor.

In other words, she can't hold down a full-time job.

The picture @ R29's link makes me think she has really nasty farts.

[quote]In other words, she can't hold down a full-time job.

Since one of her "identities" is "housing precarious," I think you can safely remove "full-time" from that description.

Her entire position can be summarized as "I want free money and blame 'systemic whatever' rather than myself for not being successful in life."

The real issue here is The Advocate bringing attention to her.

We've all heard it, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Her's is ... hers and is ridiculous, but so is 99% of Twitter/X.

By publishing her, the Advocate is giving her (COMPLETELY unwarranted) attention. I would also say, if I were Chasten, I wouldn't have responded, but whatever.

Fuck her. She is itching for a fight 24/7 per R16-R18. I'd almost believe R12 (I don't) that she is a plant, because no one in my life that I've talked to in person, is this delusional.

A big case of 𝐒𝐈𝐖𝐎𝐓𝐈.

When I taught Queer Studies to college students, I included some material by the Against Equality “scholars,” in the interests of including multiple perspectives. Nonetheless, I thought it was bullshit then and now.

She’s an attention whore. Anyone labeling themselves as “queer” is an attention whore.

How ironic her last name is Nair when she’s a hairy bitch

R32, I believe that what Chasten B was responding to, and what the Advocate article was at least partially reporting on, was her review published in Nathan J. Robinson's Current Affairs magazine.

Seeing the tweets on this thread, and the tweets she's written since, I agree with you that it would be better if Chasten hadn't responded, as she's clearly a bit nutty.

Agree with everything you say R37. He shouldn't have engaged at all. This is going to end in tears.

They're going to mud-wrestle on Thursday to settle it!

Chasten should retaliate by adding “Nair” to her shampoo.

She seems unbearable. I still agree with the hunch that the Buttigiegs windowshopped for maximum potential points towards a presidency. I'm not a fan of people buying surrogates in general.

A PhD from Purdue…. Printed on the thinnest toilet paper, no doubt…

Why are they disabled almost every fucking time?

Is she an Indian lady pretending to be black and a straight cis women pretending to be queer? All the while being opposed to equality for the groups she is cosplaying as? That’s pretty messed up.

Oh wait, her criticism of gay people is all about how they don’t stand with or understand the working class despite the fact that she didn’t come to the States until Graduate School, which would indicate to me that she grew up reasonably wealthy in India. HOW DARE SHE.

I hope she gets kicked in the cunt bone.

What an exhausting piece of work

Why are they engaging with a homeless straight woman?

Buttigieg may be image conscious, but this bitch is insufferable.

[quote] I still agree with the hunch that the Buttigiegs windowshopped for maximum potential points towards a presidency.

If you fallowed him before he ran for the Presidency, they wanted kids from day one. There is old video about it somewhere. Anyway, it just looks like it was always the plan regardless of future career moves.

Plus I would argue all the straight hetero's do this and even brag about it. When a supreme court judge is being selected, his whole family is brought out to support him. Countless commercials of almost every politician with their "family". You name it, all about families and "the children".

Having watched Chasten's tweets for years, he does not suffer fools and is likely better than language than she is despite her dubious PhD

Kids are real in a way Tim Scott’s girlfriend and Yazmin Nair’s whole persona isn’t. I don’t understand how she hasn’t been Rachel Dolezal’ed yet.

She's more exhausting that Roxane Gay.

R53 is the Union of Indian University Professors

The kids are adopted. People are still wrongly saying they’re born via surrogacy.

Typical shit-stirrer, who thinks their own shit doesn't stink.

[quote]as she's clearly a bit nutty.

A bit nutty? The bitch is full of nuts!

Peter might finally give me a new minivan if I keep this fight going another week.

If Robin Roberts calls to interview me, it’s a sure thing.

Why can’t Pete & Chasten make life choices for the same reasons most people do? Because Pete ran for President and is Transportation Secretary? I don’t get the disdain for this successful and apparently happy gay couple.

[quote]I’m sick and tired of this shit from gay men: the sort who either hate their own working class backgrounds and/or uses ideological differences to basically hold entire groups of people in deep contempt.

Wow. She has DL absolutely pegged.

She’s the type of shit American colleges produce.

Not all of us R60.

I wonder if she posts here R61?

She has so much rich material just from sticking to the adult gay men of the world. But to bitch about their children? That's low, even for an unemployed, homeless shrew.

I hate every single asshole who writes for Current Affairs and similar publications.

[quote]That's low, even for an unemployed, homeless shrew

I prefer "unwaged, housing-precarious woman with terrorist hair", R63.

One thing she's right about at R16 & R17 & R18 -- and it is very evident here on DL -- that white gay liberal men tend to be classists and look down on the working classes and only pay lip service to them (like making or watching movies/plays about such people).

Vile woman. I find difficult to believe any lesbian or ‘queer’ person would publicly write such an attack. And the issue of surrogacy destroys any credibility. His response was mild.

She's. doing this to get attention which is what she wants if she didn't do this her lunatic ramblings would be ignored.

He made a mistake giving her the oxygen of publicity. She seems like an attention seeker with issues.

I can't get worked up about the opinions of people like that, mostly because I don't really believe the majority of their views are genuine.

If she has terrorist hair, it’s only because she chooses not to comb it. And it’s quite likely that she perms it. That woman is fake. And I don’t appreciate her cultural appropriation of blue collar Americans.

GWM fund and control queer spaces -- bars, LGBTQ+ centers. People resent that. This has everything to do with GWM and nothing specific to do with Chasten & Pete.

[QUOTE] The political spectrum isn't a line, it's a circle, where the extreme left and extreme right stand shoulder to shoulder, not at opposite ends.

That's so reductive. Did you get that quote from Reddit?

“Housing-precarious!” Get a real job you mangy cooze.

GWM are queer people so it is totally fine if they own queer spaces.

I resent straight, cis-people calling themselves queer while simultaneously campaigning against equality for queer people and attacking queer families.

[quote] Chasten should retaliate by adding “Nair” to her shampoo.

Oh R40, do you actually think she uses shampoo?

[quote]white gay liberal men tend to be classists and look down on the working classes and only pay lip service to them

That's an income level thing, not a race thing.

R76, right, it's an income thing, not a sexual orientation or race thing. And that poster should keep in mind that she never specified white gay men, she just said gay men (as a whole); She's dumb.

Who she be?

r45 great point re: being relatively wealthy. She wouldn't know what working class was if it shat on her doorstep. I'm going to assume she comes from a very privileged family in India. The only working class she was exposed to were the servants that cooked, cleaned and cared for her family

R72, no, I didn't. But telling you know enough about Reddit to think so.

R66, if we're being honest, who doesn't?

The Streisand effect

Does she talk about the rampant homophobia in the black community?

Harpo! Who dis fat, ugly blqunt?

She was a brown queer woman in a black dress.

[QUOTE] GWM are queer people

And I resent being called "queer".

Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT. Yasmin Nair is a crazy, homophobic CUNT.

It’s not my favorite either R86, but I think you may be missing the bigger picture in this context.

I don't like queer either, but the point is, you can't reclaim something that doesn't actually apply to you.

It is like a white person "reclaiming" the N word.

R36 has left me literally teary from laughing. Take me, R36. And leave nothing left.

She’s using queer as a stand-in LGBT and then discouraging (by using shame) a positive activity by one portion. of the group, in an attempt to disempower the whole group.

It’s a highly sophisticated version of those troll ads that encouraged liberal man not to vote so women’s votes would count more.

She’s counting on reactions like yours to allow her to do her work without meaningful dispute.

No disrespect to the Subcontinent, but why does India seem to produce the most annoying SJWs? I'm thinking of Vaid Menon, that other enby who's mom paid for his Manhattan apartment, and this brown queer woman.

R92, as someone from that region, it's probably because South Asians in the west are possibly the most sheltered kids in the world.

Yasmin Nair is one of those people who can never realize or admit that if not for white people and institutions needing to check off those boxes with black/brown/other/gay faces and resumes (yes, they are FORCED to), she wouldn't get hired at Trader Joe's as a cashier!

Can you imagine the terror of being her co-worker? I'm certain she doesn't do a goddamned thing all day, but run her fool mouth and write sternly-worded emails! Academia is such a racket and has the side effect of producing these useless types who are determined to never work an honest day in their lives who we're forced to listen to!

Thank you R93. America does create spoiled monsters.

There was an comment piece in The Times today about cancel culture. It didn't argue those who cancel should be stripped of their capacity to try, but that they represented, usually, such an insignificant minority of people (not identities, eye roll) that they were having outsize influence - because cowardly institutions allowed it.

It is not that cancellation has met its match; rather, it’s that most modern controversies represent a kind of illusion. Yes, Murphy trended.Yes, her comments were a big deal on Twitter. But most people are not on Twitter and even fewer post on it. What almost destroyed Murphy’s career wasn’t an online spasm but the craven overreaction of her record label, venues, the BBC. And what saved her? That’s right: thousands of people (far more than those calling for her boycott) sending her album up the charts. Some selected hits.

"Consider, for a moment, the statistics. The number of people who signed an online petition calling for The Kerala Story to be cancelled was 120,000, which might sound like a lot but is less than 0.2 per cent of the British population. Cineworld nevertheless canned the movie.."

"And isn’t this a pattern we see again and again? It only takes a thousand or so people — less than 0.002 per cent of the population — to send a hashtag flying on Twitter but how often do we see not only record labels but big corporations and even editors genuflecting to these trends? What are they frightened of? To go weak-kneed at the sight of these ripples on the surface of cyberspace is a category error, a kind of selection bias, and a betrayal of the silent majority. It also incites online activists to become more punitive, doubtless astonished that they wield such power."

Poll after poll reveals that majorities of western citizens (unlike hardcore users of Twitter) support free speech, tolerance and compassion. They also reveal that most people are exhausted by punitive attacks. Cancel culture thus only works in the context of institutional appeasement. "

R66, you're describing the left/"progressives".

Extremist Progressives eat their own!

More at 11.

Bitch needs to get a J O B

[quote]from the edges of life

Que? She identifies with blue collar workers because she believes she’s one of the people now that she’s always broke due to her personality disorder.

don't you dare wear short shorts

Well, these enbies, TWOC, and so called "queer females" with blue hair can start their own inclusive bars. But why do I get the feeling these types are bad tippers?