WTFucking What?? Susanna Gibson Democratic candidate, performed sex acts with her husband online - and asked viewers to pay TIPS

I say, grab her by the pussy

Curious behavior for a politician.

The husband's kinda hot. I'd like to see the vids.

Cute husband. Hung? Cut/uncut?

She's a psycho. Does she honestly think she's got a chance after this

[quote]Gibson is running for a highly competitive seat in suburban Richmond.

So that seat is basically lost now on account of her being a cam whore, that's just great. I'd lick the husband's shitter though, he's cute.

I think Jennifer Garner should play her in the Netflix anthology series, White House Whore.

Hubby is cute! He looks fit too. Where are his nudes?

"In other videos, she suggested that she and her husband have “tried swapping” with different partners as she is “ethically non-monogamous,” but that he “doesn’t like sharing.”

'Yeah I f*** random strangers if you're hot,' she says. 'We have tried swapping. I was telling them earlier about ethical non-monogamy. We uh, he doesn't like sharing.'

'I've had three in a day actually,' she says at another point. 'Don't tell my husband he was the third.'

She's so sex positive she should be a gay man.

Can your hubby continue with me? I'll keep your spot nice and warm till you get back

"Curious behavior for a politician."

Not for ex-hooker Lauren Boebert

Yet Republicans will support a guy found liable for raping a woman

His cock looks pretty thick!

Here he is getting sucked and pounding away.

Chaturbate is shocked, SHOCKED, to learn gambling is goign on.

However, the potential violation of Chaturbate’s terms and conditions loomed large over these transactions. The platform’s guidelines explicitly stated that requesting or demanding specific acts in exchange for tips could lead to sanctions, potentially resulting in a ban from the platform for all parties involved. Susanna Gibson’s involvement in soliciting tips for specific acts raised questions about whether these actions ran afoul of Chaturbate’s rules and policies, further fueling the controversy.

Looks like the two hookers took down their videos

The guy at R13 looks cut (to answer R4's question).

Tokens for your suckable toes

I’m sorry, this is just disgusting and Dems will lose the seat. She was an idiot to think this wouldn’t come out or that it wouldn’t matter.

I don’t care what she does in her private life but she shouldn’t have run for office.

She is claiming this story is a) an invasion of her privacy and b) criminal under Virginia's revenge-porn law. I don't think either argument works under the circumstance of videos voluntarily placed on porn websites where any random viewer could access.

Besides with 5700 followers plus however many thounds of additional non-follower viewers who can even imagine there was the expectatrion of privacy.

The bitch is woefully clueless about public decency, egotistically doubling down when caught, and completely. lacks any ethical backbone.

She’s make a perfect Vice President!!

The husband is hot.

This thread is useless without pics or, better, videos.

R22 are you incompetent? The video is posted at R13

WHOA that husband is hot!

I was expecting MMF at R22 and was disappointed to see hot husband just having boring missionary with that poor, stupid, flat-chested girl.

They are not very passionate kissers, but that's ok.

Also, sleuth at r13, find us a good cumshot!

The couple actually made their kinky passion look boring. She has a great bod for her age, he's ok I guess if you are into that sort of thing. But too much time gauging the audience, or gouging them. Difficult to communicate lust and eroticism when their focus is on looking at a computer screen.

r12 Yeh, but that's different - rethugs are fine with it - you just can't flaunt it - that wouldn't be very Christian, now would it?

From whore to politician. Makes sense.

She is in a swing district and has committed no crime. The seat was going to be tough no matter what democrat ran. Unfortunately, the seat now probably leans more republican because of this news, but only because republicans are fucking hypocrites, not because she did anything wrong.

[quote]She is in a swing district

Can't argue that.

He has a great body.

I approve this message.

That was some pretty dull sex, although all the elements were there. The "take it all" was kinda hot, but for me mostly because I think it was the only way he gets to express all his seething resentment of being trapped in an open marriage he doesn't want (don't shoot me, she says it in the quotes at R9.)

Whatever, it's the 2000s, we all have the tech to to produce our own porn. It doesn't make a bad person. Maybe a little odd, because most of us don't produce our own porn even though we can.

So what I don't get is how this crazy person can rationalize she's going to get away with running, because even a state senate seat is now viciously contested, down to the worst and ugliest oppo research they can find. A person smart enough to hold office should be smart enough to figure out this kinda stunt really fucks your chances. Most of her voters aren't thinking oh, Tom and I do that. And (cliche) her poor kids. And her husband's career and all the mockery and ick factor in every day life. This made international news. What an idiot.

It's a great illustration of the weird and troublemaking contradiction of our times, especially where tech is concerned: yeah, we can, but should we?

Across town, Samantha was ruining her own political future under the watchful lens of the ironically named photographer Matthew Brady.

So many people participate in online porn now I imagine in the future this will come up more and more with people with political or other kinds of ambitions. Whether you went on cam last week or as a student ten years ago it's still out there. It's not wrong of course, you do you, but some people don't want to see their teacher or their representative getting plowed and sucking cock with just a few mouse clicks.

Honestly, I love screwing, but I accept video of me out there at it would not get me elected to anything, hired for anything or admired for anything.

Chaturbaters say anything to turn on their viewers. The bit about being in a relationship may be true, or they could just have a preponderance of viewers who are into the hotwife lifestyle and tip more when it’s brought up.

She screwed her husband, herself, and Democratic Virginians.

At least it was with her husband and not some hooker like most republicans are into

Here is why she’s dumb — she should have found a way to squash this story until she won. THEN rub their noses in it and point out how she’s just like Brazilian Trans Hooker George, raw-dogging’ porn star loving Dump, et al. Her timing is the issue, she should have found a way to keep this tamped down for now, she’s fucking ridiculous. But at this point, her only defense is that half the country has declared they will vote in a fucking rapist, so BFD on her stupid videos.

The next scandal will be how much her husband wants me. I have the receipts. Somewhere.

ISHC

[quote] the seat now probably leans more republican because of this news, but only because republicans are fucking hypocrites, not because she did anything wrong.

She didn't anything right either. Not sure why this pastime of hers possibly could qualify her for office. Mis-judging the impact of this story doesn't bode well for her decision making process in a potential public office either. Let's just move on. Quickly.

She should get to be president, running on the "I grabbed him by the cock" ticket.

Anyone who videos anything sexual is deluded if they think it may not end up in the public domain somehow....people are idits...

It will all depend on they come off as the deal with this disclosure. But she has a much better chance winning now than she did before.

She could never ever buy this amount of publicity.

I meant *the bit about her fucking other guys at r36

[quote] Anyone who videos anything sexual is deluded if they think it may not end up in the public domain somehow....people are idits...

That's the problem for her. It didn't just end up in the public doman. It began there.

This wasn't a home video of a man and wife stolen by somebody and leaked. This was a 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 with her husband and herself successfully video whoring themselves out to as many strangers as they could.

Wait and see. After she loses the election they'll go on OnlyFans. Or at least she will.

R13, yes but it is a TOTAL TURNOFF to see a woman licking his cock. I'm at the far end of the spectrum (if on it at all).

Guy is HAWT though. I would rim him deep.

So many horny people underestimate the chances of getting recognized on 18+ cam sites. I'm a basement dweller with not many acquaintances and even *I* once stumbled upon a guy I know jerking off on Cam4.

The Dems will not leave her. She is a well known progressive very pro gay rights very pro choice known personality.. She was never getting a lot of the Deep South church vote already.

Richmond’s Republican conservative voters should be a bit more moderate , than some other parts if the state, more like NVA Republican voters than the voters in the rest of Va, (outside of more liberal college towns,)

I am not at all sure this is going to sink her any more than being progressive pro choice pro gay rights would normally sink her.

They are married a couple, She was not cheating in him. She is pretty. He is pretty. She is a Family NP. They have two good looking kids.

I am pulling for them.

[quote]I am pulling for them.

I want to pull for him.

If it doesn't sink her, all bets are off. Anything goes. Personally profiting from politics will be the only thing that can sink you. The question is Democratic voters... it's obvious Republicans lack the brains to be influenced by scandal. What about Dems? This is going to be a really interesting test case about political scandal.

Not a smart lady.

I vingah poo-say een magzeens uhgin, ehh?

I despise her. She needs to immediately drop out of the race and let the Dems replace her. If she and hubby posted porn for money, they are true whores. They can be whores but don’t run for office in Virginia.

[quote]The Correct Answer To 'That Democrat Did Porns On The Internet!' Is 'YUP!'

[quote]But again, I think if you do sex work and then run for office, the proper answer isn’t “oh no you outed me,” the proper answer is FUCK YEH I DID! You can’t have secret stuff when you’re running for office. You can have out loud, fuck yeah, let’s do this stuff when you’re running for office. So let’s do it!

If she was a sex worker, who openly ran for office that’s one thing. She’s a frau with the nice family who sells porn secretly. And talk about pretty privilege. If the family were ugly no one would support them.

It worked for the Kartrashians

I wrote her and asked her to step down. You can find the address on her campaign site.

I wrote her and urged her NOT to stand down.

Stand strong girl. Don’t let those afraid of the prudes drive you out. Fuck them

Whores in the house, whores in the house!

She's probably going to get kicked off all the platforms for asking for tips. The DM 😅

[QUOTE]'Y'all I need more tips ... They want anal and missionary but I'm only doing it if they're in a private room.' She adds: 'Racking up one token left and right, any more? I'm raising money for a really good cause.'

[QUOTE]It's unclear if she meant she was raising money for her campaign.

Her people are calling this an illegal invasion of privacy, revenge porn, and a sex crime.

The thing for the democratic party to do now is say she was a stealth Republican candidate…since stealth republicans really are running as democrats

She’s pretty good at ducking his cock

If I could describe what my perfect guy would look like, it would be him.

The husband is hot..

Is the husband hung or average? I thought acceptably average.

How old are their kids? Can you imagine what they would go through in high-school? You know how lovely teenagers can be, dataloungers².

r59 why?

Again, we must ask - any cumshots?

R71, she's a clown and embarrasses the Democratic Party. Isn't it obvious?

She is also claiming that it was her Republican rivals who brought to light the existence of the online videos, which were obtained by DailyMail.com, just a few months ahead of election day on November 7.

'𝑴𝒚 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒐𝒑𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚'𝒓𝒆 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒊𝒕 𝒂 𝒔𝒆𝒙 𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒎𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒎𝒚 𝒇𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆'𝒔 𝒏𝒐 𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒘𝒐𝒏'𝒕 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒌 𝒖𝒑,' 𝒔𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒂𝒊𝒅.

But the newly-unearthed videos show Gibson was anything but scrupulous about her online sexual trysts.

The videos were posted to Chaturbate, a platform that says it is named for 'the act of masturbating while chatting online.' Videos on the sight are streamed live without a password, and often archived on other publicly available sites.

Under Gibson's username, she had more than a dozen videos archived on another site, Recurbate, in September 2022 – after she entered the race. It's not clear when the live streams took place, but her username had 5,770 followers.

The videos are no longer active on Recurbate, but can be found on other publicly available sites.

What sex crime? She released the videos herself to make money. This isn’t a revenge porn situation. She’s seems like a sociopath.

A broken clock is right twice a day, or so they say….

R76 must be a Republican

Do you think Trump humiliated himself by being found liable for rape or bragging about grabbing women by the pussy?

But you praise a right-wing shill like Laura Ingraham who is attacking someone for having consensual sex

R77 I called that cunt a broken clock. She did embarrass herself. Trump is a piece of shit. This country is gullible and watches too much TV and clings to God.

75 76 same thing, she’s still a cunt

So the fuck what? After Trump anything goes in American politics.

She teaming up with Stormy Daniels for some slit-on-slit action. Yummy

[quote]She needs to immediately drop out of the race and let the Dems replace her.

I agree. She went too far. She should step down and allow a Dem with a better chance of winning to come forward.

Her husband reminds me of a slightly less robust Beto O'Rourke.

I think Susanna is terrific. I really do.

Will she have to declare her tips under Federal finance and campaign laws? That's probably the first way the party can eject her, if her financials don't hold up under simple audit.

Didn’t she swim for Penn?

The husband is the star of that video.

The husband is an attorney and was voted a "Super Lawyer" of 2021.

How he couldn't have seen this coming, I can't fathom.

Their kids will be bullied to the point of suicide in school. ("Watched your dad fuck your mom online last night!")

It's one thing to do this if you're a lawyer and a nurse in small conservative community. Clueless.

It's another if you have kids.

How do you possibly explain your parents fucking for tips online? It's quite a progression from saying, "Mommy and daddy have adult time, so when the door's locked, knock" to "Mommy and daddy are earning extra cash doing prone bone after you've gone to bed."

And every future friend, friend's parent, and potential employer will be able to watch them fuck too.

I love how some of you do the republicans work/bidding for them. I guess you just can't help yourselves.

What a dingbat.

I love how some of you pretend that this couple hasn't acted irresponsibly and committed career suicide. I guess you have no common sense.

He’s a child custody attorney?

He's a family law attorney.

It will be interesting to see how this turns out. Democrats always drop out at the first sign of non-mainstream sexual behavior or embarrassing photo opps (Katie Hill, Al Franken), but Republicans have supported Trump through accusations of multiple—MANY—sexual infractions.

She's a medical professional who said she wanted to run after seeing Roe v. Wade overturned. Does having sex with your own husband on video mean you can't govern, according to Virginia voters? And what if your basic platform is women's license to do what they wish with their own bodies? We shall see! They are apparently millennials.

[quote]It will be interesting to see how this turns out.

Despite all the pro-sex work blather from Wonkette, Jezebel and the BPD queens of Twitter and Reddit, most voters will find her lapses in judgment disqualifying or even disturbing (for the reasons R89 mentions). Liberal women with kids might pretend to support her publicly, to avoid criticism from others, but it's unlikely to carry over into the voting booth.

Well known progressive, pro gay rights, pro abortion. And you think she was going to win before this surfaced?

She may have little chance today but I doubt it’s a less of a chance. Young people do vote, swingers vote, progressives vote, gays vote, those concerned with abortion rights vote, men who say to themselves I would hit that, they also vote.

As long as the weak ass Dems don’t fold and run like they did with Al and Katie. . A big if.

If she can just deal with that donation $$ stuff she could stand a better chance now.

At some point, R95, sexual reality is going to wash over and benefit the Dems.

Especially because it's become clear Repubs are not about reproductive rights.

Straight people want to be happy and fuck. They want to fuck their wife on webcam. They want to fuck their wife in another room with another couple. They want to trade their partners and fuck, occasionally on webcam, occasionally for revenue. They want to be "ENM" (ethically non-monogamous). Previously these were your normal, stand-up mom and dad who were getting up to dirty shit before the internet. Or your straight male politician who had an unsatisfied wife and two mistresses nobody reported on.

Now it's a growing subset of the population, and in view of other bigger issues—like encroaching fascism and the death of democracy—they're going to be accepted by voters, eventually.

[quote]Democrats always drop out at the first sign of non-mainstream sexual behavior or embarrassing photo opps (Katie Hill, Al Franken), but Republicans have supported Trump through accusations of multiple—MANY—sexual infractions.

So your desire is for Democrats to be more Republican-ish?

To whom will they give their first sit down joint interview?

I can't believe they're not from Florida

I find their pronounced tan lines a bit distracting (though that wouldn't be enough to make me vote Republican).

Who knows? She could be the Bella Abzug of now, if Bella Abzug were hot and blonde with big fake tits and advocated Democratic principles along with being married but fucking different guys with her husband's permission?

This is the Onlyfans/Chaturbate world we're living in.

Wanting to bone while people watch doesn't mean you can't care about your constituents. In fact...

[quote]Straight people want to be happy and fuck. They want to fuck their wife on webcam. They want to fuck their wife in another room with another couple.

Swinging and especially cucking are very big on the right. If she fails to connect with liberal voters, she could try her luck that way.

R97, I'd like to see some data on that because it sounds like wishful thinking. If we're introducing anecdotes, a friend of mine with twenty year olds is exasperated because they're not dating and having sex. She can't figure out what the hell they're up to. (It's actually kind of comical when she goes all Julia Sugarbaker about it. "I spent my whole life trying to teach them it was OK and they just needed to... etc. so forth.) I'm just not convinced there's a great groundswell against sexual convention. I could be wrong but I'd need to see data.

[quote]I find their pronounced tan lines a bit distracting

They are deeply tanned. Yet interestingly, plainly not nudists. What a complex couple of exhibitionists they are.

R103

She is already going after right wing or right leaning , or left swingers and cucks .

Anyone know off hand what universities are in her district?

R104, your friend is the one on Chaturbate like these two.

We're not talking about the reactionary approach Gen Z has to sex—which is that they hate it and aren't having it, partly because of all this public shaming.

I can assure you, R017, my friend is not on Chaturbate. But thanks for your grandiosity. You're undercutting your own position now. Kind of free love Trumpy.

Katie Hill (D) - consensual behavior among adults = FIRE HER!

Al Franken (D) - one picture from 30 years ago, when he was a comedian, which involved no assault - FIRE HIM!

Donald Trump (R) - accused of sexual assault by 25 women since the '70s - LEAD US, NEW JESUS! OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT TO GET YOUR ASS IN THERE!

On one hand, it's her choice to make. On the other hand, I can still think it was a really stupid choice (which goes to her judgment.) On the next hand (I grew up near Three Mile Island) does the weirdness of some normal to all appearances, attractive, upper middle class couple fucking for money on the internet mean something in politics in 2023? I know we passed old fashioned modesty with Melania, so....

For me, I look at that and I wouldn't vote for her. (Nor would I vote against her, I just wouldn't vote.)

Unless she comes out, and free of a bunch of spin hyperbole about revenge porn and just says this is why I did this, this is who I am, she just got caught. I mean, she should have scrubbed those things before she contemplated running. That was stupid and arrogant and goes again to her character and her judgment.

To R109's point, Republicans are definitely better at tribal. I think Franklin got railroaded (and I still wait for him to run as an independent and then caucus with the Dems, before restoration. And screw upstate Kirsten.) But I dunno, do Dems also wanna follow bad candidates at all costs?

Where's the vetting?

If your point is that Democrats hold their politicians to a higher standard of conduct, R109, you won't get any argument from me.

He’s handsome, has a good body and a very nice cock, but judging from that video, he’s not a skilled lover and lacks passion.

Some have invaded the reviews section of his law practice and left some scathing, albeit hilarious, postings.

R83, I agree. And I’d be willing to bet that Beto and his heiress wife have made similar videos that we’ll never see.

Which is fine as long as they're not for public consumption and they don't solicit tips

How much could a couple like this make in tips in the course of an evening? Genuinely curious.

[quote]he’s not a skilled lover and lacks passion.

With a dick and face like that, and a lawyer's salary, it's never been required.

The kids look young.

A funny world we live in. Some of the exact same people bashing this couple for their now public kink are attacking Scott for not announcing to the world if he eats ass or not.

She’s a stupe

Get rid of her. Call her a stealth Republican

R119, Will some Republican report them to DSS?

Yes, please.

Slate is worried.

Gibson spent hundreds of thousands of other people’s dollars to win a primary with the full knowledge that her side gig could compromise her ability to win the race. At the very least, she should have retained the services of a professional who could have scrubbed the internet of those videos and images before the launch of her campaign.

It reflects poorly on the Virginia Democratic Party that there was no care taken to thoroughly vet the candidates in this toss-up district before the primary, such that Gibson’s videos might have been unearthed and erased. With two months to go before the election, who knows what the GOP might dig up next?

Don’t Democrats do background checks anymore? They also missed Santos in NY. A simple resume check would have done there.

Does he ever show his load?

[quote]Don’t Democrats do background checks anymore?

With Gibson, they didn't even glance at her face. She has textbook crazy eyes that should've alerted someone to dig deeper.

I don't think the local parties have the resources to do background checks. Look at George Santos (though there was some investigative reporting on him that should have raised flags). And the state and national parties have bigger fish to fry.

I’m howling at the Slate article though. In a better world her sex work would have a positive outcome on the election. Yes, who doesn’t want a pol who can multitask.

Her hubby the family law lawyer might benefit. He handles your custody issues and you can watch his wife blow him.

Interesting in the Daily Maul...ssome eople are shaking it off

One friend, who asked not to be named admitted, 'I was shocked when the details came out. I consider her my friend and it's certainly not the sort of thing you expect but she's still got my vote.

'She's done the work, she's canvassed, and she's made it clear where she stands on the issues and that's what it comes down to. I think what came out should never have come out and it was done for the wrong reasons.'

She added, 'I think it's different for people of my parents' generation perhaps – they know her too and the shock value is definitely more difficult for them to see past.'

But speaking this week another friend, who wished to remain anonymous said, 'I still support her. Yes, it gave me pause for thought, but mostly because it was a question of poor judgement.

'I mean of course it went through my mind, 'Who would run for office when they knew they had this in their closet?' Perhaps it didn't occur to her that it was archived, my understanding is nobody was ever meant to record these livestreams, so somebody has broken the law and should be prosecuted.'

He added, 'She's certainly guilty of internet ignorance - anything that's on the internet lives forever.

'But what am I going to do? Vote for the guy who'll ban abortion but won't ban guns or tax the rich?'

Another confessed, 'When I first heard about it, I was totally turned off her as a candidate. Maybe it's my age, I'm in my sixties, but it felt so deeply inappropriate.

'But then I reflected more, and I thought, 'Well look what Donald Trump got away with,' …grab them by the you-know-what and he still became President. I don't think what she's done was as bad as that.

'Ten years ago, it would have been a game changer, but the culture is different now. She was with her husband, there was no infidelity that we know of. It's kind of complicated. I was once Republican, but both my husband and I have become more liberal in the wake of Trump. I don't want abortion to be rowed back.

'It's going to take more than a leaked sex tape to see me vote Republican again.'

Ok let’s check back again in November. I’ll say times have changed. If she wins. If she loses and costs Dems Virginia, she can go fuck herself.

R131

Yes other than a sex scandal it’s unheard of that Dems ever losing in Va said no one ever,

The dishonesty of these democrats!

And the lack of family values!

And y’all just know there’s more, and she’ll be blackmailed for it!

Is it possible that she'll pick up a lot more of the male vote now?

This is Virginia whose racist governor just recently left office. Automatic cancellation rules don't apply to the democratic candidates.

She’s in a district that could go either way. And her seat is crucial in giving Dems any day state govt. She didn’t have the brains to deal with the videos asap. Oh well, see you soon n November. If her district is such a lost cost to Dems the videos won’t matter.

…say..cause..

A girl's gotta eat.

A girl's gotta eat dick.

[quote]If she loses and costs Dems Virginia, she can go fuck herself.

And she will. For tips.

Well, if she were a Republican, she'd be guaranteed a victory. It's amusing to see the MAGAts twist themselves to defend Lauren Boebert's public sex acts as a nothingburger at best, or red-blooded normal for middle-aged people to near fuck at an all-ages theater performance of PG material.

MAGAts are not concerned about how a true public sex act is going affect Boebert's four children and third generation grandchild of young, unsuitable-to-parent, unmarried teenagers.

[quote]MAGAts are not concerned about how a true public sex act is going affect Boebert's four children and third generation grandchild of young, unsuitable-to-parent, unmarried teenagers.

Apparently, MAGAts want their kids to emulate Boebert's trashiness.

What's the deal with Boebert? I made out in Schindler's List and scored a home run before the semi-intermission; And I'm feeling pretty proud.

R143

You realize that it’s been democrats demanding she drop out of the race . Some on this very thread. You seen any quotes from serious republicans calling for her to drop out?

If looks like that TX group invited her before the public, near-fucking incident video was released. Or before the video evidence she refused to stop vaping in front of a pregnant woman. The best part was that the trashy duo offered to buy cocktails for said pregnant woman and husband! If TX group doesn't rescind, they need their asses kicked.

r146 - I'm sorry I wasn't explicit enough trying to point out the irony of the situation in my post because it was the whole point.

If you'd like to offer constructive criticism how I may have done a better job, I'm open to hearing it.

How awkward will it be for the husband to appear in a court of law where everyone knows what he looks like naked and has witnessed him having sex with his wife?

R148

You might have pointed out that it was the Dems asking her to quit. That was not at all clear in what you posted. In fact you never mentioned the Dems at all. Your entire post was about republicans.

I was not being snarky I read your post differently that’s all.

It's a nice cock. Apparently a very tasty cock.

[QUOTE]I read your post differently that’s all.

You need to learn subtlety and context before you jump on allies.

Who is the weirdo always asking if white AMERICAN men are cut or not. Over 95% of Americans circumcise their sons, especially white Americans. So weird to ask.

Is that the husband in the photo??

Why do these people with public careers do crazy shit like this and think no one will ever recognize them. I don’t get it. You go on Chaturbate and fuck your husband on the internet, where everything is forever, but you’re a politician? Make it make sense. It doesn’t.

And then when it comes out you play victim, speaking about privacy? YOU PUT IT ON THE INTERNET YOURSELF.

R80 Exactly. I doubt after Trump implodes into oblivion, other politicians will go back to pre Trump levels of political bullshit. Nope. They now have new deeper depths to sink. We are fucked for some time.

R155

Why?

The exact same reason someone will have anal sex without a condom and get syphilis or hiv. The exact same reason people will go to a public park, drop pants and ask a stranger if they can blow them,

People are often risk takers and when it comes to sex .They only think of the now

If she survives this and wins election, I guess 90% of what used to constitute a sex scandal is not an issue anymore. The only thing that could sink you is rape and incest. Though I suppose rape and incest won't be a problem for Republicans on Republicans.

How many tokens for her to rim him?

R159 shoot for the stars. Let's see him getting pegged.

she kinda looks like hillary swank and also that bitch from the food network. gia? gigli?

Won’t the family lawyer husband now have to deal with people posing as prospective clients just to have a one on one meeting with him?

Unless he has his own firm he should be worried about being let go

R161 that’s a generous assessment. She looks like Gaspard Ulliel c. 2007. Uncanny really.

[QUOTE]The only thing that could sink you is rape and incest. Though I suppose rape and incest won't be a problem for Republicans on Republicans.

It makes one wonder what on earth Trump has on Lindsey Graham. A dead boy, underage and from a "good" family. Or something similar...