They will reportedly recount their experience of living inside the palace and royal life.
(They never lived in the Palace.)
Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
They will reportedly recount their experience of living inside the palace and royal life.
(They never lived in the Palace.)
|by Anonymous||reply 80||June 4, 2023 1:39 AM|
She spent more time talking about the RF than actually in the RF.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||May 24, 2023 12:15 AM|
"There are a lot of nuances from their story that they feel are still missing after the documentary and Harry's book," a source tells Closer magazine.
The source says the couple were "obviously happy" with their paycheque from Netflix for the documentary and are "keen" to work with the streaming giant again.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||May 24, 2023 12:16 AM|
[quote]"There are a lot of nuances from their story that they feel are still missing after the documentary and Harry's book," a source tells Closer magazine.
They are grasping at that, thinking that if people could just see the nuances, then people will rally to their side.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||May 24, 2023 12:18 AM|
Whew lordy, site about to go into Primetyme with all this Harkle spam
|by Anonymous||reply 4||May 24, 2023 12:21 AM|
I wonder if their strategy is to release BRF-related content for the next few years until their kids are old enough to start making family content (not lowly YouTube videos lol, but like documentaries or something). Because I get the feeling they will need to stay in the public eye to stay afloat. There’s probably no other option.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||May 24, 2023 12:36 AM|
They really haven't told their story often enough!
|by Anonymous||reply 6||May 24, 2023 12:49 AM|
Tyler Perry can't pay their bills forever!
|by Anonymous||reply 7||May 24, 2023 12:53 AM|
Doesn't he have money that could be invested so his family can live on that income? Then they could devote their time to representing some charity that's important to them, even though that kind of work doesn't pay big salaries. That would be a dignified way of life, serving an honorable purpose to benefit some worthy cause. Instead of what they're doing now, hustling for the sake of publicity like a couple of money-grubbing hucksters.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||May 24, 2023 1:26 AM|
Their royal trauma dumps could be ported to any number of exciting new technologies. They could do a ChatGPT collab “What if I was the heir?”, or do a televised therapy session in a self-driving car. Perhaps a Discord special where they watch their own Netflix series for some reason. Endless possibilities.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||May 24, 2023 1:47 AM|
[quote]Because I get the feeling they will need to stay in the public eye to stay afloat.
Doubtful. I know that's the line from the usual Sussex hater types, because they need to believe that "everybody hates them" and "they're going broke" and such, but there's little chance that Harry has run through all his mother's money AND the podcast money AND the book money. In a few years, maybe, but not at this point.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||May 24, 2023 1:50 AM|
[quote] Then they could devote their time to representing some charity that's important to them
They do the Invictus Games and there are a few charity appearances that never get attention, mainly because the tabloids can't exploit it. An awards ceremony where Harry is a surprise guest can be exploited, Meghan showing up in regular clothes to help women open their own small businesses can't.
Someone said on another thread that they needed good PR to tell them to stop complaining so much and release more positive, fun messages, and I'm guessing they finally got that.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||May 24, 2023 1:52 AM|
They are miserable and humorless so positive and fun is not possible.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||May 24, 2023 2:00 AM|
She's spent more time bitching about the royal family than she ever spent in it.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||May 24, 2023 2:10 AM|
It is just amazing how they so boldly rejected the royal life after a very brief stint for a new private independent life. Yet they continue to grift and support their lifestyle from talking about nothing else.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||May 24, 2023 2:14 AM|
Of course they are. They aren't nearly as interesting on their own.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||May 24, 2023 2:41 AM|
The horse is dead and they are bringing back it's corpse to beat it again
|by Anonymous||reply 16||May 24, 2023 2:47 AM|
What we have here is another story by a British tabloid to get all the Harry and Meghan haters riled up. Then it will be proven to be a lie, like many of the other tabloid stories, and it will just stay out there and never addressed, because that is how the tabloids work. Before you get all pissed, wait for an official release by Netflix and not a story trafficking in the Harry and Meghan hate industry.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||May 24, 2023 2:48 AM|
R17, we are still waiting for the Spare retractions and corrections.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||May 24, 2023 12:26 PM|
Shit, I just saw one of these Sussex hater trolls say Harry hadn't even finished writing Spare yet! What kind of cheap-ass trollbot outfit has been hired for this kind of stuff, and why?
|by Anonymous||reply 19||May 24, 2023 12:29 PM|
So far, this is just a rumour. But if it isn't, it shows that Harry and Meghan have realised that for them, there is no "moving on" (as they promised after Oprah, Netflix, Spare . . .) because they have nothing else to sell that anyone will buy.
As poster above pointed out, they never for one moment as a married couple lived in any palace. They lived in the grounds of Kensington Palace in Nottingham Cottage, and then in Frogmore Cottage.
If they use any footage that isn't in the public domain, the Palace can sue for invasion of privacy.
And, given that Harry now faces a 400,000 quid bill for the court case he just lost re demanding judicial review of the Home Office's refusal to let him hire public serving police officers at will, and will likely lose the one he recently filed asking for judicial review of the reasoning the Home Office used in stripping him of his armed police protection in the first place, in their shoes I would think twice about trying on private footage taken inside any royal dwellings without permission.
They're clinging frantically to the royal adjacency that they themselves debased when they left.
There are other rumours circulating that the King is considering turning Harry's ducal title into a life peerage only, thereby ensuring that Harry can't pass on to his descendants any emblem of their once-royal adjacency beyond the farcical titles of his two American kids, who live in an environment in which those titles mean nothing. If the King does so, it means that all Harry's and Meghan's royal posturing ends with Archie and Lili.
Imagine a full-length (90 minutes?) programme of the Sussexes nattering on about royal life.
The mind boggles.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||May 24, 2023 12:59 PM|
Is that why she wanted to take all those photos of our place? So she could show what Royal life really looks like?
|by Anonymous||reply 21||May 24, 2023 2:15 PM|
For someone who wanted no part of the Royal family ,she's never giving up on trying to catch a ride on their coat tails, is she?
She really is a pain in the ass.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||May 24, 2023 2:41 PM|
I’m one of the few people who like them. But enoughs enough. Move on!
|by Anonymous||reply 23||May 24, 2023 3:59 PM|
Every time I think I've reached peak disgust...
|by Anonymous||reply 24||May 24, 2023 3:59 PM|
Like an ex who can't get over you, even after you've both remarried/repartnered.
Wasn't he supposed to be tapping this "trauma" out of his system? Pathetic.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||May 24, 2023 4:13 PM|
Harry lived in the palace didn't he? It didn't say they lived there together. They are very smart. This is when they can rake in the money because all of the haters watch this stuff which just makes them more and more money. In the meantime the reward for the haters is to just have more stuff to spout off about and to be able to call them liars. Win Win for everyone.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||May 24, 2023 4:23 PM|
Can they just FUCK OFF already????
|by Anonymous||reply 27||May 24, 2023 4:24 PM|
R4 Wrong again.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||May 24, 2023 4:28 PM|
Today's report: Harry and Markle Are 'Shocked' by Reaction to NYC Car Chase: 'Absolutely Not Exaggerated'
Suck it, Markles. You lie.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||May 24, 2023 5:32 PM|
Their only problem with the monarchy and the Windsor family is that Harry wasn't born before William. Using their royal titles is ridiculous.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||May 25, 2023 12:04 AM|
[quote] I know that's the line from the usual Sussex hater types, because they need to believe that "everybody hates them" and "they're going broke" and such, but there's little chance that Harry has run through all his mother's money AND the podcast money AND the book money. In a few years, maybe, but not at this point.
Oh, okay. So they’re just your run of the mill famewhores.
Honestly, I loathe Harry more at this point. What a fucking spoiled whiny man-baby.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||May 25, 2023 12:15 AM|
What can there possibly be left to tell? Meghan was miserable, the press didn't like her and having to curtsey to her grandmother in law was hilarious, we know! Harry suffered frostbitten dick, William broke his necklace, and daddy didn't love him enough, WE KNOW! If he carries on at this rate we'll now things as obscure as his thoughts on the wallpaper in the 2nd floor bathroom in the west wing of Clarence House by 2026.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||May 25, 2023 12:26 AM|
Keeping my fingers crossed for a The Princess Diaries remake!
|by Anonymous||reply 33||May 25, 2023 12:31 AM|
Fuck Netflix. They keep raising the cost of a monthly subscription to underwrite trash like this. And want 8 bucks a month per person if you share your password. Did the fuckers who dole out the money to produce original content read a newspaper or watch the news anytime in the past week?
|by Anonymous||reply 34||May 25, 2023 12:37 AM|
I don't subscribe to Netflix, or any other streaming service for that matter.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||May 25, 2023 12:43 AM|
SPOILER ALERT: this ends in lamps from IKEA and tears.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||May 25, 2023 1:02 AM|
When will they do the Netflix version of Camelot?
|by Anonymous||reply 37||May 25, 2023 1:20 AM|
The most desparate two people in hollywood. Uggg ,i am sick of them.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||May 25, 2023 1:56 AM|
The more Prince Dim and his wife talk, the more people notice their vapidity. Keep digging, squirrels.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||May 25, 2023 2:23 AM|
It'll be a very short film. Markle was in the royal family for 10 minutes.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||May 25, 2023 8:14 AM|
Charles was a tampon longer than Meghan was a Royal.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||May 25, 2023 8:36 AM|
"I wonder if their strategy is to release BRF-related content for the next few years until their kids are old enough to start making family content..."
It's my theory that Harry has put his foot down about publicizing the kids, as he didn't like growing up in a fishbowl, so that revenue stream may be closed off... as long as they're married.
Seriously, their financial future looks increasingly iffy, they've got nothing to sell except the royal connection, and their lifestyle is VERY expensive. So if they want to keep the money rolling in, they need to get involved in some non-royal drama to keep the public interested. Either move to Botswana and become save-the-elephants warriors, try to go back to royal life for more material, or work up a massive long-running feud with their neighbor Ellen. The last should be easy and convenient.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||May 25, 2023 3:36 PM|
It was never on the cards anyway but when the queen said no to the half working royals half Hollywood celebrities lifestyle she really foresaw the future. It'd have led to the Harry and Meghan being double paid by both Netflix and the state to do things like open shopping centres it'd have been ridiculous.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||May 25, 2023 3:53 PM|
It’s still ridiculous, R43. The late Queen was prescient.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||May 25, 2023 4:36 PM|
Oh good. This again.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||May 25, 2023 4:43 PM|
It's Wednesday. Who is Harry suing today?
|by Anonymous||reply 46||May 25, 2023 4:50 PM|
DumDum lost one lawsuit, and part of another one, so piled on the invisible car chase, it's been a stellar week.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||May 27, 2023 1:04 PM|
r11 There isn't any charity appearance that they do that the media isn't interested in. That is just comple untrue. They release all of this kind of information to the media. All of it- and I don't believe they let the media know they will be at place for a charity function and all the tabloids uniformly said nah not going to cover it not interested which is effectively what you are claiming.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||May 27, 2023 9:27 PM|
These two can't fart without it being reported on and they are still thirsty as fuck.
It's like watching a train that's sure to crash.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||May 28, 2023 11:46 AM|
I would like to know how big an entourage they employ. With Netflix crew, security detail, cooks, maids, chauffeurs, I bet it's more than a regular royal has at his disposal. Social envy set aside, I think it's hilarious that they're fantasizing about private islands on one day and try to play relatable everyday persons the next.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||May 28, 2023 12:01 PM|
Now there are divorce rumors but I am not buying it
|by Anonymous||reply 51||May 28, 2023 8:48 PM|
I'm totally buying the divorce rumors. I think they've been separated for a while already and will divorce soon. It's been five years of marriage, that's enough. We'll still be "treated" to all the angst, drama, court filings over custody, property, child support, alimony, etc. As well as the interviews, articles, documentaries of their divorce and the inevitable memoirs.
The SouthParkle's cottage industry will carry on.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||May 28, 2023 9:16 PM|
Thanks, but I’ll wait for the South Park retelling.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||May 28, 2023 9:34 PM|
I think they are encouraging divorce rumors to distract from the embarrassment of their 2 hour sham car chase. But I would think Harry would die before he admitted he chose the wrong wife and Meghan knows her prestige drops when she divorces.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||May 28, 2023 10:26 PM|
They backed each other against their own families too hard. Too many "told you so" type comments coming at them if they split. Piers Morgan and all the other people she ghosted will be in seventh heaven. And Bogart, the dog she adopted because Ellen supposedly told her to but who she ditched because he didn't like Harry, what became of him? There's never been any updates.
If Dimbo is spending time at hotels on his own, it's likely to be her idea. He's too ugly, petty and stupid for anyone to tolerate for long. He needs to travel all the way from Montecito to LA to attempt to get his manboobs, double chin and gut in order? Hardly an example of a sustainable lifestyle.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||May 28, 2023 11:07 PM|
Compared to them I'm a summer breeze.
|by Anonymous||reply 56||May 29, 2023 2:55 AM|
Prince Harry's 'dreams are COLLAPSING' amid legal pressures in the UK | Angela Levin
|by Anonymous||reply 57||June 1, 2023 1:44 AM|
What does a duchess wear to a deportation?
|by Anonymous||reply 58||June 1, 2023 1:50 AM|
Fuck, they’re never going away, are they?
|by Anonymous||reply 59||June 1, 2023 2:11 AM|
He won't ever be 'deported'
|by Anonymous||reply 60||June 1, 2023 2:21 AM|
A girl can dream, can’t she R60?
|by Anonymous||reply 61||June 1, 2023 2:27 AM|
I’m going to assume this story is BS because, well, it’s ludicrous. Nothing about the tweets source comes close to confirming.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||June 1, 2023 2:29 AM|
Oh look. More spam generated by a Twitter account singularly dedicated to shitting on the Harkles.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||June 1, 2023 2:33 AM|
Apparently after the drug and porn bust at the home Michael Hutchence and Paula Yates shared (where they lived with their baby and her daughters), Hutchence feared not being allowed to tour with INXS in the US if he received a conviction for possessing drugs. Given he'd freely admitted in interviews years before to snorting heroin and taking lots of drugs, as other stars who travelled/travel to the US did/do, it's probably going to take more than just self-admitted drug use for Dimbo to be kicked out.
Even Amy Winehouse was granted a US visa when it was well known that she was an addict.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||June 1, 2023 8:35 AM|
R60, no shit you knob
|by Anonymous||reply 65||June 1, 2023 11:19 AM|
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
|by Anonymous||reply 66||June 1, 2023 11:27 PM|
That is pathetic. Now they’re begging people to let them come to their parties?
For three years in the US, they fucked around and I guess now they’ve found out. Hollywood thinks they’re toxic.
Now that the Klan Granny trolls are the only ones who’ll have them, they’re in for a surprise: the $u$$exe$ wouldn’t even think about hanging out with KGTs because there’s nothing in it for them - they’re not important people, can’t get them jobs, and more importantly, they continue to sink the Harkle’s favorability scores by behavior even more idiotic than H&M’s
Too bad, so sad. Maybe Andy Cohen has something for them…
|by Anonymous||reply 67||June 2, 2023 12:11 PM|
Two other choices: Sussex Con with the Dumb Squad, and selling shit on the internet.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||June 2, 2023 4:46 PM|
What kind of shit, though, R68? It can't be royal.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||June 2, 2023 5:09 PM|
I have no idea. An article said Sparkles' blog is shooting for between $15M (Kourtney Kardashian) and $235M (Goop). So stuff nobody really needs.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||June 2, 2023 8:01 PM|
She always wears the wrong thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||June 2, 2023 9:53 PM|
Stupid story- bulls shit probably about a couple starting to live out a modern version of Edward and Wallis: lives remarkable for nothing more than a connection to the royal family that they have disowned. Not working out any better for them than Wallis and her dumb husband. I have a feeling Harry is just as dumb.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||June 2, 2023 11:01 PM|
The Sun.- ROYAL GOOD NEWS. Harry and Meghan to stop making royal-bashing Netflix shows and tell-all books after huge backlash.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||June 3, 2023 2:53 AM|
Princess Kate STUNS in a GOLD ballgown and the Lover's Knot Tiara at Jordan's Royal Wedding:
|by Anonymous||reply 74||June 4, 2023 12:15 AM|
Being the best-dressed woman in the world, or at least the best-dress internationally famous in the world has got to be a full-time job. With all the long hours of fittings and discussions and hair and makeup and squirming into Spanx involved, I hope she has time to occasionally get a glimpse of the children!
Damn, she looks fabulous.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||June 4, 2023 12:31 AM|
Aren't these the two assholes who left the Royal Family because they wanted to live private lives?? Okay, then SHUT THE FUCK UP. Nobody cares about you or anything you have to say.
|by Anonymous||reply 76||June 4, 2023 12:36 AM|
Agree that Catherine is running on all cylinders and is at her peak. She does have the luxury of long lead times for most major events, and clever assistants, but damn, she must be a torrid organizer
|by Anonymous||reply 77||June 4, 2023 12:40 AM|
Well, something good came from their stans. They've raised $105K for a charity that builds playgrounds in low income areas.
I wonder if Archewell has donated this much collectively over the last year. That would be an awful lot of sandwich trays and Starbucks gift cards. They made it sound like they'd footed the entire cost for the Uvalde playground when the donation was $10K.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||June 4, 2023 12:42 AM|
Archewell should be investigated. Seems like a big grifting tax-exempt slush fund.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||June 4, 2023 1:05 AM|
Don't the announcement and pictures suggest it's all Archewell's doing? I searched for where I read about the donation and it was a poster in the Near-catastrophic Part III. Apparently it was only $1000.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||June 4, 2023 1:39 AM|
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!