Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex is set to receive the Ms. Foundation’s Women of Vision Award tonight in New York

Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, will be in New York Tuesday night, along with Black Voters Matter co-founder LaTosha Brown, to receive the Ms. Foundation’s Women of Vision Award, as the nation’s oldest women’s foundation marks its 50th anniversary.

The appearance is set to be her first public event since she skipped the coronation of her father-in-law King Charles III earlier this month in order to stay at home in California for her son Prince Archie’s fourth birthday. Her husband Prince Harry attended the coronation in London and then rushed back to California.

Funds raised at the foundation’s annual gala at the Ziegfeld Ballroom in Manhattan will be used to further the organization’s equity-centered initiatives and its mission of advancing women’s collective power.

The foundation will also honor Wanda Irving, co-founder of Dr. Shalon’s Maternal Action Project, and Kimberly Inez McGuire, executive director of URGE, as well as abortion rights activist Olivia Julianna and LGBTQ+ advocate Rebekah Bruesehoff.

Teresa C. Younger, Ms. Foundation president and CEO, said in a statement that the honorees will be celebrate for “their many accomplishments and tireless work on behalf of gender and racial equity across the country and the world.”

Gloria Steinem, Ms. Foundation co-founder, will present Meghan the award for “her global advocacy to empower and advocate on behalf of women and girls.” Meghan and Prince Harry direct their philanthropy through their Archewell Foundation, which provided nearly 13 million COVID-19 vaccines with partner Global Citizen and helped resettle nearly 175,000 refugees from Ukraine and Afghanistan in the United States with partner Welcome.US, according to its 2022 annual report.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 463May 25, 2023 12:09 PM

I'm glad this is happening for Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 1May 16, 2023 6:48 PM

How is Archewell doing anything with the paltry amount of money they raise?

by Anonymousreply 2May 16, 2023 6:59 PM

Does she ever wear her hair curly?

by Anonymousreply 3May 16, 2023 7:03 PM

R2 precisely, looks like legit organisations let them "partner" with them.

by Anonymousreply 4May 16, 2023 7:44 PM

"Ms. Foundation's Women of Vision" Award???

What has she done to deserve such an award?

Meghan Markle married well. That is all.

Presenting her with an award is anti-feminist. It tells women -- especially young women -- that you do not have to do well in school, work hard at a career, or become an independent woman. All you need to do is marry a rich man.

The only reason Meghan Markle is a public figure is because she married a son of the British King.

It does not matter that she college-educated or achieved a degree of success as an actress in show business...None of that matters...Meghan Markle married well.

That is anti-feminist.

by Anonymousreply 5May 16, 2023 8:02 PM

I ain't even team royal family or something but Meghan Markle is kinda useless? Like she is worse than Paris Hilton because she isn't even entertaining. Why is this person pushed so much?

by Anonymousreply 6May 16, 2023 8:05 PM

It sounds like a made-up event little kids would have in their backyard.

by Anonymousreply 7May 16, 2023 8:07 PM

What a fucking insult to LaTosha Brown, who actually achieved something pretty consequential, and not just for her own aggrandizement.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8May 16, 2023 8:12 PM

Very Deserving

by Anonymousreply 9May 16, 2023 8:13 PM

Meh...seethe klan grannies....seethe.

by Anonymousreply 10May 16, 2023 8:15 PM

Markle bought herself another award.

The award is meaningless.

by Anonymousreply 11May 16, 2023 8:24 PM

if anyone anywhere can point to a single, substantial contribution this person has made to anything, a single example of her vision, even one instance where her actions or words had the slightest impact on any issue, circumstance, condition, outcome, awareness, or situation being experienced by or spoken of by anyone anywhere on god's green and abundant earth, harry excepted, then i will get her name tattooed on my ass and defend her to the death not just here, but in the afterlife as well

by Anonymousreply 12May 16, 2023 8:36 PM

Well said R12, fake it until you make it must be her mantra

by Anonymousreply 13May 16, 2023 8:41 PM

Golddigging is now considered a feminist pursuit??

by Anonymousreply 14May 16, 2023 8:42 PM

I can't wait for the divorce

by Anonymousreply 15May 16, 2023 8:42 PM

It is a shame there are so few awards. They are so many deserving un-awarded celebrities.

by Anonymousreply 16May 16, 2023 8:43 PM

[quote]I can't wait for the divorce

R15. Don't be so sure. Yes, they can each find other partners, but the Markles are looking for status, and no one with any status wants to be associated with them.

by Anonymousreply 17May 16, 2023 8:50 PM

Why is Markle so desperate for publicity? Nobody knew who she was before and nobody needs to know who she is now. What's her endgame? A reality TV celeb? Politics? Does she think she's going to be named Feinstein's replacement by acclamation from her online troll farm? Barbara Lee and Katie Porter will cut a bitch.

by Anonymousreply 18May 16, 2023 8:52 PM

R18. Markle is a bottomless pit. She wants status and notoriety. It's never-ending, and it's never enough. It will never be enough.

She doesn't have an endgame. It's a constant pursuit of status, the spotlight, people adoring her, power, money and fame. It's not going to end. Meghan Markle is a bottomless pit of ego, ruthlessness, spite and vengeance.

by Anonymousreply 19May 16, 2023 8:57 PM

No big deal. It's a nothing award.

by Anonymousreply 20May 16, 2023 8:59 PM

Where's the clip of Markle being interviewed by some C list entertainment reporter in Toronto where he keeps looking over her head trying to find somebody more famous to interview? Markle went berserk. She would not be ignored!

by Anonymousreply 21May 16, 2023 9:00 PM

R18. Meghan Markle is a narcissist. Her ego is a vast, endless black hole that can never be filled. Narcissists have no feelings or emotion when it comes to elevating and drawing attention to themselves--and the only thing that matters to the narcissist is the narcissist. They are missing a chip in their brain. It cannot be fixed.

by Anonymousreply 22May 16, 2023 9:02 PM

Royals give awards, they don’t purchase them.

Oh, wait. She’s not royal. Never mind.

by Anonymousreply 23May 16, 2023 9:03 PM

I saw Gloria Steinem publicly dissing the English Royal Family in a snotty manner on TV a number of years ago. Now she's running after, of all people, Meghan Markle, and kissing her ass for all she's worth. Gloria is a humorless old hag who knows how to play the publicity game in order to give herself more publicity. She and Sparkles deserve each other!!

by Anonymousreply 24May 16, 2023 9:18 PM

M$. $ellout

by Anonymousreply 25May 16, 2023 9:19 PM

Is this the best award her money could buy?

by Anonymousreply 26May 16, 2023 9:23 PM

William as a head of the Baftas awarded himself a Bafta award. Nothing tops that.

by Anonymousreply 27May 16, 2023 9:27 PM

R26, it’s better than whatever she was doing at the Indianapolis Marriott. Marginally, anyway.

Check out the Ms. foundation website and see what they support. It 95% black girl charities with a few NA, Latina and trans. It’s a racist scam.

by Anonymousreply 28May 16, 2023 9:27 PM

[quote] No big deal. It's a nothing award.

It's an award from the oldest women's foundation in the United States.

So yeah, it's a big deal.

Jealous, bitches?

by Anonymousreply 29May 16, 2023 9:32 PM

Gloria Steinem continues to be a joke. She cozied up to this idiot and now she’s giving her made up awards.

by Anonymousreply 30May 16, 2023 9:40 PM

[quote] It's an award from the oldest women's foundation in the United States

No it isn’t. lol

by Anonymousreply 31May 16, 2023 9:45 PM

Go, Meghan!!

Keep making the jealous Klan Grannies seethe!!!

by Anonymousreply 32May 16, 2023 9:46 PM

Do we refer to her as Duchess Division now?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33May 16, 2023 9:47 PM

R32 = elitist

Plenty of non 1 percenters deserve that award.

by Anonymousreply 34May 16, 2023 9:48 PM

If you’re so keen on being referred to as “The Duchess of Sussex” what are you doing in California?

by Anonymousreply 35May 16, 2023 9:48 PM

I thought Ms. magazine died off 30 years ago. I assume they're giving attention whore Markle an award so she can get her fangirls pushing the event on social media whereas the other 'winners' are totally unknown and wouldn't attract any attention to the awards which nobody actually knew existed anyway. Like most people thought Gloria Steinem died 20 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 36May 16, 2023 9:51 PM

I’m starting to think the rumors about Steinem being a CIA agent are correct.

She accomplished nothing.

ERA didn’t pass; we lost Roe v. Wade; violence against women renders zero outrage…

by Anonymousreply 37May 16, 2023 9:58 PM

I'm indifferent to Markle, but I enjoy the seething from the klangrannies.

by Anonymousreply 38May 16, 2023 10:00 PM

Will she bring along her ginger handbag?

by Anonymousreply 39May 16, 2023 10:02 PM

Same here R38. They bring more attention to her than anyone else.

by Anonymousreply 40May 16, 2023 10:03 PM

She’s being mocked you gasbags at R38 and R40.

No one is seething.

by Anonymousreply 41May 16, 2023 10:06 PM

I really love when she buys these awards because it's so amusing to watch people try to explain what she did to "earn" the award over people who actually try to help others.

The NAACP award was hilarious because instead of focussing on how glorious it was that such an august organisation gave them an award, normal people were left cautiously asking "Wait - what is this for again? I can't remember what she was supposed to have done that deserved this recognition. I'm sure she did SOMETHING, I just can't remember what it was..." And the questions then just float into oblivion because no Meghan fan ever convincingly answers, since of course she did absolutely nothing except perhaps sign a cheque.

This is exactly the sort of thing that make normal people look at this couple and think they're totally disingenuous twats. It does no favours for the organisations that lower themselves to giving fake awards to the pointless pair, either.

by Anonymousreply 42May 16, 2023 10:07 PM

Like that dangerous-driving Kennedy gobshite giving them some courage award for tackling something. What have they actually done apart from "share their story" while begging for privacy

by Anonymousreply 43May 16, 2023 10:11 PM

I think it's a gimmick. The Markles have a built-in publicity machine with their troll farm and that weird guy Bouzy pretending he runs Twitter. So if you want some attention for some previously unknown 'award', you give one out to the Markles knowing they'll get their troll farm to get it trending on Twitter. Like that actually matters. It's an 'influencer' thing and the reason all influencers should have their Iphones confiscated.

by Anonymousreply 44May 16, 2023 10:14 PM

Meh, r38, what goes around comes around. You won’t be young forever. You’ll get old & the youngs will eventually hate you, too.

Glad my house is paid for, I have retirement accounts, ample savings & no debt. Did it all by myself, too. Not sure if that will be in reach of future generations but oh well.

by Anonymousreply 45May 16, 2023 10:16 PM

Yep. She’s in town.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 46May 16, 2023 10:16 PM

Please stop with all the hate.

Snark and first class pointless bitchery is entertaining but hate is not.

by Anonymousreply 47May 16, 2023 10:16 PM

R47 you must have got lost in cyberspace on your way to the Mary Sue. This is the DL.

by Anonymousreply 48May 16, 2023 10:22 PM

R15 that's for sure

by Anonymousreply 49May 16, 2023 10:59 PM

R48 - DL did not use to be like this until all the British Royal threads happened.

by Anonymousreply 50May 16, 2023 11:01 PM

Who’s paying for her to keep winning random awards? I thought they hated royal life but they keep the titles ? She’s claiming she’s black yet her resume/head shots lists her as white and she’s never smart enough to match her blackface makeup to her hands.

by Anonymousreply 51May 16, 2023 11:15 PM

R50 I've been on the DL since Monica blew Bill C. It's always been like this. Can't take the heat, get outta the DL's kitchen.

by Anonymousreply 52May 16, 2023 11:15 PM

I guess anyone can get an award now. Just suck some frozen, inbred possibly diseased royal dick and awards just fall in your lap.

by Anonymousreply 53May 16, 2023 11:20 PM

What do we think of her gold dress? I can’t decide if it’s fun or trashy.

by Anonymousreply 54May 16, 2023 11:39 PM

Harry, Doria and Rachel.

They must have returned the rent-a-kids.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 55May 16, 2023 11:40 PM

“Hertz Dream Cars Available Here”

by Anonymousreply 56May 16, 2023 11:43 PM

[quote] It's an award from the oldest women's foundation in the United States.

How embarrassing for you.

by Anonymousreply 57May 16, 2023 11:43 PM

Doria looks nice.

by Anonymousreply 58May 16, 2023 11:45 PM

It’s like she just rolled out of bed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 59May 16, 2023 11:45 PM

She needs a stylist who specialises in helping veil rectangular figures.

by Anonymousreply 60May 16, 2023 11:48 PM

Not the most flattering look. She needs a corset for her waist and an A-line skirt. This gold thing makes her look like a tank on sticks.

by Anonymousreply 61May 16, 2023 11:48 PM

Gold-plated Smeg.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62May 16, 2023 11:50 PM

Why can't she dress herself? She looked fine in her Suits days.

by Anonymousreply 63May 16, 2023 11:51 PM

If you’re going strapless, wear a tube top or nothing when faux-tanning.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 64May 16, 2023 11:58 PM

She looks like she lost a good amount of weight. Ozempic?

by Anonymousreply 65May 16, 2023 11:59 PM

She haslost weight, but why does everything she wear look crumpled?

by Anonymousreply 66May 16, 2023 11:59 PM

She's had cheek implants. How come she can't get Harry hair implants?

by Anonymousreply 67May 17, 2023 12:01 AM

She really has no idea how to dress herself. It's as though she imagines her body to be a completely different size and shape than it is.

by Anonymousreply 68May 17, 2023 12:01 AM

Bad color on her. Bad style on her short-waisted figure. Bad fabric, she's too petite for something so thick and chunky-looking.

by Anonymousreply 69May 17, 2023 12:03 AM

She's a little teapot, short and stout. With scrawny bird legs.

by Anonymousreply 70May 17, 2023 12:04 AM

She needs to rehire her former Suits stylists. Her figure looked good in those clothes.

by Anonymousreply 71May 17, 2023 12:04 AM

Her face looks good when she’s super thin but her body really doesn’t. I expected more honestly. I thought she looked good at that last award they bought, but generally she looks dresses like shit.

by Anonymousreply 72May 17, 2023 12:07 AM

Everything she wears is one size too small. If she wore clothes tailored to her actual size, she would actually look slimmer.

by Anonymousreply 73May 17, 2023 12:07 AM

She *really* doesn't need so many horizontal seams going across her (broad, flat-chested) torso. Curved lines around her bust (above and below) on the bodice would have given the illusion of shape there and made her waist look smaller. The top bodice area should have had gathers/pleats below each breast, rather than the horizontal lines going across the middle of her bust.

She always picks the outfits that only supermodels can pull off.

Did she do a merching deal with the designer of this dress?

by Anonymousreply 74May 17, 2023 12:10 AM

They’re a vision all right.


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 75May 17, 2023 12:16 AM

That ninety year old has more of a waist than Smeg does!

by Anonymousreply 76May 17, 2023 12:21 AM

Oh Aunt Muriel will be deleting THIS thread just as soon as she perceives its existence, just like the original thread announcing the future awarding of this significant and BRAVE prize to Duchess Smegma. Don't hold your breath, the kibosh is on its way.

by Anonymousreply 77May 17, 2023 12:22 AM

Steinem is full of shit. How sad to be so thirsty at her age. And if MM is so supportive of women, why did she give notes to the authors of Finding Freedom (*vomit*) slut-shaming her sister? Her sister is in a wheelchair FFS and MM didn't sling some of her Suits bucks her way back in the day, or use her profile to raise awareness and/or funds for MS. No wonder Samantha hates her.

by Anonymousreply 78May 17, 2023 12:24 AM

Meghan is built like a log, and that dress just highlights everything wrong with her figure. Doria looked nice.

by Anonymousreply 79May 17, 2023 12:26 AM

As she was making her way into the venue someone in the crowd yelled, “how does it feel to be part of two broken families?”

by Anonymousreply 80May 17, 2023 12:27 AM

You haters are hilarious.

I know you are serious in your venom but your unhinged obsession is comedic because it's so extreme and based on no verifiable information.

by Anonymousreply 81May 17, 2023 12:28 AM

R81, the “information” is the picture of the lady dressed in a golden bacofoil garment which is too small.

by Anonymousreply 82May 17, 2023 12:30 AM

I wore it better.

by Anonymousreply 83May 17, 2023 12:31 AM

R78, how could she throw some Suits money to her sister? I think during that time she was still getting money from Pa Markle (but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong).

by Anonymousreply 84May 17, 2023 12:32 AM

R75 Gloria looks embalmed. Like he just crawled out of a coffin.

by Anonymousreply 85May 17, 2023 12:33 AM

FF the ugly racist at R46.

by Anonymousreply 86May 17, 2023 12:33 AM

R81, here’s the link to what was said referenced in R80.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 87May 17, 2023 12:34 AM

Wrong again R86

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 88May 17, 2023 12:35 AM

“Meghan, how does it feel to be a part of SMASHING APART two broken families”


by Anonymousreply 89May 17, 2023 12:36 AM

Gloria posing with one of the 3 Little Pigs.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90May 17, 2023 12:36 AM

Imagine making your grand entrance next to a budget car hire outlet.

by Anonymousreply 91May 17, 2023 12:37 AM

R88 She probably meant well but writing a message on a banana looks unintentionally humorous!

by Anonymousreply 92May 17, 2023 12:40 AM

The award is for being a bananatarian?

copyright H G Tudor, who's a grifter but it takes one to know one. Well, not really. Most people know that's what she is and it will only get worse. Ha ha, Duchess Harridan.

by Anonymousreply 93May 17, 2023 12:41 AM

Did the deal with Dior fall through and now they are merching for Hertz Car Rental?

Didn't O.J. Simpson shill for Hertz?

I think the Duchess of Hertz has a nice ring to it.

by Anonymousreply 94May 17, 2023 12:42 AM

Did Merchie and Lillibucks get to stay up late to see HRH Mommy get the special award?

by Anonymousreply 95May 17, 2023 12:45 AM

R81 too true.

by Anonymousreply 96May 17, 2023 12:45 AM

‘Let Megz put you in the driver’s seat!’

Doria looks high as a kite.

by Anonymousreply 97May 17, 2023 12:45 AM

She looks fine. Steinem looks embalmed. An embarrassment for Ms. since all of this woman's accomplishments have been through men.

by Anonymousreply 98May 17, 2023 12:50 AM

The dress almost exactly matches the Hertz logo colour. It's uncanny.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99May 17, 2023 1:05 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100May 17, 2023 1:05 AM

How does Doris have a better figure than Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 101May 17, 2023 1:06 AM

Doria chose wisely. Her dress is well proportioned and it flatters her figure.

by Anonymousreply 102May 17, 2023 1:10 AM

Unlike her daughter, Doria understands how to dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 103May 17, 2023 1:13 AM

How could anyone screw something up this bad?

by Anonymousreply 104May 17, 2023 1:17 AM

Isn't Markle the same woman, who, while being interviewed by Oprah, on world-wide TV, re-said the words "Waity Katie" thereby reminding everybody of the sexist, mean, sobriquet the media coined about Kate?

Kate doesn't need my defending.

My point is that Markle knew the humiliating power of those two words against Kate which is exactly why she said them.

Thanks, but, no thanks.

I'll take my lessons on "the sisterhood" from someone other than the mean girl Markle showed herself to be during the Oprah interview.

And, I like and respect Steinem, but she needs to hang it up and retire with honors.

by Anonymousreply 105May 17, 2023 1:19 AM

Screw what up R104? What exactly did she do?

by Anonymousreply 106May 17, 2023 1:20 AM

They went into the venue via the Hertz because they a "SO security conscious" that they could not possibly enter the actual entrance with the hoi-polloi other guests, and ended up creating a perfectly colour-matched frame for a million "Rent-a-Duchess (at budget prices!)" memes for use evermore.

They don't even need that kind of security and they know it. They were really just trying to avoid being booed, so this result is especially hilarious.

by Anonymousreply 107May 17, 2023 1:21 AM

Tight jacquard ? No human should wear a tight jacquard dress.

by Anonymousreply 108May 17, 2023 1:23 AM

R101, We just need to take a gander at Thomas Markle to get the answer to that.

by Anonymousreply 109May 17, 2023 1:25 AM

Harry seems to have a lot more fun than William.

Harry was at the coronation, then jetted back to LA, went on a sushi date with Meghan in Santa Barbara with Gwyneth and Brad Falchuck, and then jet set to NYC for the award gala.

And that all happened between Saturday and Tuesday!

William is stuck at home with his boring wife and gray walls.

by Anonymousreply 110May 17, 2023 1:27 AM

I still have no clue what you grannies are on about.

by Anonymousreply 111May 17, 2023 1:29 AM

In the 70s, my mother had a jacquard tablecloth that she threw over the card table when the ladies were coming over to play mahjong.

by Anonymousreply 112May 17, 2023 1:29 AM

Yes, they are too faboo for words R110

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113May 17, 2023 1:32 AM

Harry & Meghan were not at dinner with Gwyneth or Cameron. Cameron's people even issued a statement denying it. Ouch.

Many of us early feminists saw through Gloria. She could and can be a good egg at times but she was such an attention-ho and had no problem using her looks & body for that attention. Her involvement with this woman is low.

And, yes, Meghan's deliberately using the term Waity Katey was an incredibly low and bitchy thing to do. She deserves no awards for anything involving women or girls after that.

I await the report on her bullying staff as well as wondering if it's true that it was Meghan who started and/or spread the rumor about William having an affair.

by Anonymousreply 114May 17, 2023 1:35 AM

Did Tom Ford have hammertoes in mind when putting his name on these sandals?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 115May 17, 2023 1:44 AM

Her dress looks like a comforter from a a cheap airport hotel...minus the semen stains.

by Anonymousreply 116May 17, 2023 1:46 AM

R105 I couldn't believe my ears when she said that, dredging it up from 20+ years ago. No wonder Kate was throwing daggers at her at the walkabout. What a small person MM is, no integrity or grace at all. You can dress her up in Dior but it's like lipstick on a pig and not a very good looking one. What a treacherous individual.

by Anonymousreply 117May 17, 2023 1:59 AM

Why does Meghan drag her Mommy with her to events. Is she supposed to be acting as her Lady in Waiting?

by Anonymousreply 118May 17, 2023 2:04 AM

[quote] Harry seems to have a lot more fun than William. Harry was at the coronation, then…

Wait! Harry was at the Coronation? Really? I don’t know him.

by Anonymousreply 119May 17, 2023 2:05 AM

R118 that's her prop Mother, MM takes her off the shelf when she needs her to look like she has someone.

by Anonymousreply 120May 17, 2023 2:09 AM

Where are those little kiddies they're so devoted to?

by Anonymousreply 121May 17, 2023 2:10 AM

R102 - Doria always look nice and elegant.

by Anonymousreply 122May 17, 2023 2:11 AM

Fake ass attention whore Instagram loving bitch.

by Anonymousreply 123May 17, 2023 2:14 AM

R114 - Per an article in the Daily Fail months ago, the report will not be released.

by Anonymousreply 124May 17, 2023 2:15 AM

I'll say something nice—she's lost weight. But that dress—ill fitting and looks cheap. And WTF is going on with her feet?? The Hertz entrance is just too hilarious for words. Is her next move going to be a car show model?

by Anonymousreply 125May 17, 2023 2:22 AM

I sometimes wonder if she dresses poorly for attention and to further Victimize herself because she knows people will dissect her. Or is it just the narcissism and she thinks she looks great?

by Anonymousreply 126May 17, 2023 2:23 AM

r114 and r124 The bullying report will not be released, but the Palace has made it's opinion of the issue crystal clear last week when they gave Jason Knauf one of the highest honours the Monarchy ever gives: The Royal Victorian Order.

Knauf was the first person to put into writing directly to the Palace how dire her bullying of staff was, and who threatened to quit if it was not stopped. They made the announcement as far back as the December 2022 King's Honours List, so the decision to honour him was made a while ago.

Among other things, that move strongly signals that the Palace believe the word of the bullied staff members, over that of the Harkles.

by Anonymousreply 127May 17, 2023 2:26 AM

I’m eagerly awaiting the Rent-a-Wreck dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 128May 17, 2023 2:27 AM

Meghan certainly deserves it, both she and Harry have been thru so much at the hands of the British press and BRF especially Charles and William.

by Anonymousreply 129May 17, 2023 2:32 AM

r126 I have had that same though so many times, although you are the first time I've ever read it from someone else. I often thought she intentionally wore inappropriate, or unflattering, or ill-fitting, or wrinkled/too tight etc clothing specifically in the hopes that she could get a negative headline (or five) in order to use them as "proof" for her then-future plans to do her tell-alls, as well as to convince Harry that she was being "racially abused" by the media, was indeed so hounded as to be the 2nd Diana, in terrible danger for her life, and so enact her plans to Megxit and make bank in California.

by Anonymousreply 130May 17, 2023 2:34 AM

What has she done to deserve an award? Jimmy Carter was building homes for Habitat for Humanity into his nineties. What charity work has Meghan done? Serious question.

by Anonymousreply 131May 17, 2023 2:36 AM

Is it typical to bring your mother along to accept every award you earn/buy?

by Anonymousreply 132May 17, 2023 2:37 AM

I think malignant Meg puts out these falsehoods about who she had dinner with thinking those involved won't respond, deny, clarify or rebutt just like the RF doesn't respond. But surprise! Celebrities respond tit for tat and don't live by the Royal Family's "never complain, never explain" motto. She really lacks basic comprehension.

by Anonymousreply 133May 17, 2023 2:38 AM

Meghan never wears clothes that fit her. It's downright bizarre. Even her wedding dress didn't fit. It's like she thinks she's tall and has a supermodel's figure and nobody can tell her otherwise. The worst are her legs.

by Anonymousreply 134May 17, 2023 2:39 AM

[quote] What has she done to deserve an award? Jimmy Carter was building homes for Habitat for Humanity into his nineties. What charity work has Meghan done? Serious question.

It's a "Women of Vision" award, not a humanitarian award.

It's given to her because of the work she has done for women around the world both now and in the past.

You haters don't even realize that she was a women's right advocate for women all over the world, and especially in Africa, before she even met Harry.

But you haters will never give her credit for that.

It's just mock, mock, mock, and hate, hate, hate.

That's why none of you can ever be taken seriously.

by Anonymousreply 135May 17, 2023 2:39 AM

This entire thread is a mental health emergency.

by Anonymousreply 136May 17, 2023 2:40 AM

The point of dragging her mother everywhere with her is because she is trying to drive home the fact that she is ACTUALLY A BLACK WOMAN OF COLOUR even though she looks like a pale-skinned latina covered with tons of bronzer and streaks of fake tan.

by Anonymousreply 137May 17, 2023 2:41 AM

Meghan still can't get any A listers to pay attention to her. Must be very vexing!

R135 you are sooo full of shit. Actresses try to get gigs with UN orgs or NGOs as "ambassadors" to get publicity. Like Angelina with UNHCR. Meghan's involvement was strictly with little NGOs or 'charities' nobody had ever heard of, scraping the bottom of the barrel to get some content for her social media account. It's pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 138May 17, 2023 2:42 AM

[quote]What has she done to deserve an award? Jimmy Carter was building homes for Habitat for Humanity into his nineties. What charity work has Meghan done? Serious question.

You people know every little thing Meghan does, you follow her obsessively, so don't play this childish game. You know what she's done, you're just mad because she's getting an award, positive press, and it pisses you off so much that you make ridiculous comparisons ("Unless she's like Jimmy Carter she doesn't deserve anything") and say racist shit ("She's not really black, she's faking it").

The really concerning thing here is that every single fucking one of you is also on social media and other forums RIGHT NOW saying the same things. You just type the same stuff over and over again, and have for years.

by Anonymousreply 139May 17, 2023 2:43 AM

[quote]You haters don't even realize that she was a women's right advocate for women all over the world, and especially in Africa, before she even met Harry.

my sides! she did minimal charity work, and even then it was to enhance her profile and put her in a good light with certain types of people. You make it sound as if she was travelling the world non-stop, hugging poor orphans and digging water wells in underdeveloped countries by hand. She did a few things with the USO and World Vision, and that was it.

by Anonymousreply 140May 17, 2023 2:44 AM

R110. Did Harry really get to have sushi with Gwyneth???? Life just isn’t fair.

by Anonymousreply 141May 17, 2023 2:45 AM

And what has Waitey Katie done for the world, besides go clubbing, chain smoke, vacation topless, and throw up all her meals?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142May 17, 2023 2:45 AM

Well, R135, boo hoo hoo

To you you you.

‘Haters’? Really? Are you a tween girl, and does your mommy know you lurk around gay sites?

by Anonymousreply 143May 17, 2023 2:45 AM

Some of the pictures I’m seeing are better, she looks good. She and Kate sure are having a battle of the long wavy hair aren’t they? It only ends when the tresses hit the floor I guess. Neither wants to be the first to cut it.

by Anonymousreply 144May 17, 2023 2:45 AM

[quote]You just type the same stuff over and over again, and have for years.

We type the same things since we keep seeing the SAME things, over and over again, out of this person. Grandstanding, attention seeking, and stepping all over others to raise a profile.

by Anonymousreply 145May 17, 2023 2:46 AM

If she doesn't want people to know what she's up to, r139, tell your boss Bouzy to tell her to drop her agent and her communications team next time they have a business call over how the paid Megstan troll farm is performing.

by Anonymousreply 146May 17, 2023 2:46 AM

At least Kate gets good press.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 147May 17, 2023 2:46 AM

Imagine what good Megsie could do if she used the money she spends promoting herself on actually doing things that really helped people. And no, handing out water and Doritos in Uvalde while filming herself doesn't count.

by Anonymousreply 148May 17, 2023 2:48 AM

I thought she was Sicilian first time I saw her on a magazine cover when she was wild about Harry or some such thing.

She looked exactly like the woman my cousin in Italy was dating at the time and she was Sicilian. Thank gawd my cousin didn't marry her, she was a bitch on wheels. My little 4'11' Neapolitan aunt chased her away pronto. My tiny aunt did what Charles couldn't do. Wussy Charles.

by Anonymousreply 149May 17, 2023 2:48 AM

This just in: The Duchess's BFF Glo will be co-presenting the award with an emotional surprise special guest star, DL's own Darfur Orphan!!

by Anonymousreply 150May 17, 2023 2:48 AM

Meghan's ghoulish photo op in Uvalde really revolted me. The woman's amoral.

by Anonymousreply 151May 17, 2023 2:50 AM

What a bizarre woman. She likes a former minister who makes a career out of denouncing Christianity but insists everyone call her Reverend.

by Anonymousreply 152May 17, 2023 2:52 AM

R149. You’re close. She’s actually Maltese.

by Anonymousreply 153May 17, 2023 2:54 AM

I wonder what the thirteen female K.P. Sussex Office staffers, several of whom were minorities and who all successively quit in a total period of under 14 months (a first at any of the palaces by a factor of 10) will be thinking when they hear that Smeg got an award for "all she's done for women"????

If only those walls could talk....

by Anonymousreply 154May 17, 2023 2:54 AM

Can't you miserable cunts just let the woman have one moment of peace?

You evil fucks.

by Anonymousreply 155May 17, 2023 2:55 AM

Camilla called Waity Katie "Kate Simpleton."


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156May 17, 2023 2:55 AM

I saw some pics of Meghan when she was a kid and she looked black then. Kinky hair, wide nose. She's Caucasianized herself.

by Anonymousreply 157May 17, 2023 2:56 AM

The Maltese thing was a lie she told to get a free media story and free trip to Malta. She now says she's 49% Nigerian and her father says there is no Maltese blood in the family, just a distant relative who was stationed there for a year during the War.

by Anonymousreply 158May 17, 2023 2:56 AM

R155. No we can’t and won’t.

by Anonymousreply 159May 17, 2023 2:58 AM

She's very boxy. She looks ok in close edits, from the waist up.

Maybe she doesn't have a full length mirror... they really look like the kind of people with a 14 room house, of which two rooms are furnished... so far.

by Anonymousreply 160May 17, 2023 2:59 AM

r155 Why don't you fuck off to somewhere else if you don't like it here, honey?

by Anonymousreply 161May 17, 2023 2:59 AM

The color and cut of the dress does absolutely nothing for her. And how veddy embarassing to enter through the Hertz lobby.

by Anonymousreply 162May 17, 2023 3:00 AM

As if she will be crying herself to sleep tonight after stumbling across this thread R155.

by Anonymousreply 163May 17, 2023 3:00 AM

R143 I'm curious why your here. You're not gay.

by Anonymousreply 164May 17, 2023 3:03 AM

Her award is for reminding people that Gloria Steinem is still alive.

by Anonymousreply 165May 17, 2023 3:07 AM

R1-R361 We have no lives without HER.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 166May 17, 2023 3:08 AM

You’re too stupid to even acknowledge R166, but I can’t help myself.

Blocked for being an dimwit.

by Anonymousreply 167May 17, 2023 3:12 AM

Oh lord, the Duchess of Sussex tells a make believe tale of coming home and seeing Ms. magazine on her coffee table while eating a TV dinner. I guess Sizzler wasn’t poor enough.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 168May 17, 2023 3:15 AM

Is that Merchie and Lilibet, r166?

Well just look at how DARLING those children are.... The absolute spitting image of their Mommy and Daddy! And so intelligent too! You can just SEE it in their precious little faces...

by Anonymousreply 169May 17, 2023 3:15 AM

Having worked in magazines for over 20 years, what Ms. Magazine was most famous for was the fact that their cover price was astronomical.

So you're telling me that Thomas Markle, or Absent Doria, shelled out double the typical mag price for the time to sit around reading it and leaving on the coffee table?

What an odd, and highly implausible, story.

by Anonymousreply 170May 17, 2023 3:18 AM

I love how pissed the Spam Mammies get if you don’t worship her. They post endlessly as if it will convert dissidents and change their minds.

R166 is a sad example. Little clown dolls? Oh how you have hurt our feelings!

by Anonymousreply 171May 17, 2023 3:20 AM


by Anonymousreply 172May 17, 2023 3:21 AM

Like these foundations mean anything

by Anonymousreply 173May 17, 2023 3:26 AM

I cannot believe Meghan set herself up for this or thought this was a good idea (unless they are getting paid by Hertz). Especially compared the splendor of the Coronation last weekend, seeing Meghan in a cheap looking, too tight gold dress walking through a Hertz rental car shop really sucks any glamour she was going for with this award.

by Anonymousreply 174May 17, 2023 3:37 AM

This made me laugh on Reddit

What you ordered vs what you get: gold dress edition ✨🏆

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 175May 17, 2023 3:43 AM

r31 Sussex squad sugars or bots arent interested in facts and reality .They are interested in trying to create a 'narrative' around Meghan. Facts are irrelevant especially if they weaken or disprove the narrative they are trying to push.

by Anonymousreply 176May 17, 2023 3:49 AM

Her drive to fabricate tedious and contrived childhood anecdotes is truly bizarre.

This one had all her hallmarks: the weird, irrelevant detail ( her cat’s collar) to try to convince you she’s not making the whole thing up, the self-aggrandisement (watching Jeopardy—-she was the smart girl, not the pretty girl!), and, of course, the glaringly improbable premise of the anecdote itself (Pa Markle’s subscription to Ms Magazine, nestled presumably amongst his copies of Cosmopolitan and Womenswear Daily).

by Anonymousreply 177May 17, 2023 3:51 AM

No matter what they say about Meghan, she will always be the queen of the people's Hertz, in their Hertz

by Anonymousreply 178May 17, 2023 4:06 AM

That was nothing short of inspired, r178. I'm still laughing even as I type.

by Anonymousreply 179May 17, 2023 4:09 AM

Haz and Hertz

by Anonymousreply 180May 17, 2023 4:13 AM

Did Markle tell her made-up, phony Proctor & Gamble dishwashing liquid story? She never fails to do so.

by Anonymousreply 181May 17, 2023 4:16 AM

[quote]Meghan certainly deserves it, both she and Harry have been thru so much

Oh FFS, R129, it's a "Women of Vision" award, not a "Women Who've Been Through So Much" award.

Being a grifter and a phony, MM has no vision beyond what her PR team cook up for her.

This award is bullshit. And deep down you know it.

by Anonymousreply 182May 17, 2023 4:18 AM

You hate Meghan so much that you listened to her speech repeatedly, and are now posting about it all over the internet. Sure, makes sense.

by Anonymousreply 183May 17, 2023 4:19 AM

Who is posting all about it all over the internet, R183? Who, hun? Don’t be shy. The internet needs to know.

by Anonymousreply 184May 17, 2023 4:25 AM

R91, she almost matches the Hertz sign.

by Anonymousreply 185May 17, 2023 4:29 AM

She’s a rental alright with plenty of mileage, how very appropriate.

by Anonymousreply 186May 17, 2023 4:56 AM

The dress itself is nice but of course looks horrible on her frame. Shes too short, boxy/square and flat chested for it. Doria looked nice but she is so phoney and an obvious grifter and user like her daughter.

I have no issues with deserving women getting awards but what Vision of Women has Meghan accomplished? Besides her Vision board to marry a rich retarded mama's boy loser and become famous for doing fuck all? (Note to self: start a damn vision board).

by Anonymousreply 187May 17, 2023 5:03 AM

Her Wikipedia page proudly boasts that she “voted in the 2022 United States elections”.

What a visionary! Give her all the awards.

by Anonymousreply 188May 17, 2023 5:11 AM

Good to see that even though these colored drifters married a white man, they still know to use the entrance reserved for negros.

by Anonymousreply 189May 17, 2023 5:17 AM

Trying to get the thread shut down, are we, Megstan r189?

Soooooo bitter, aren't you, dear?

by Anonymousreply 190May 17, 2023 5:18 AM

Megs pays PR firms like WME a LOT of money to keep her name/image firmly within the public eye. Awards to be received (more often than not "awarded" due to the incessant harrague of the PR firm), projects partnered between Megs . . .uh . . . Archewell and chartible organizations, even something as mundate/inane as "Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex Contributes Recipe to “The World Central Kitchen Cookbook: Feeding Humanity, Feeding Hope”. The vast majority of PR about awards/projects/whatever focus on Megs far more than the project. It's all about highlighting Megs and her public image in that look at me, aren't I wonderful kinda way.

An even cursory look behind the PR hype reveals that most of the projects are nothing more than a web page containing a few sentences hypiing a "cause" and requesting donations, including on the Archewell Foundation site, empty shells with no purpose other than to bolster Megs pubic image and monumental ego. A tawdry grift hidden behind a well-designed web page. But then Megs the practiced grifter is well aware that a "professional image" is far more likely to attract the marks.

by Anonymousreply 191May 17, 2023 5:19 AM

Just like the article about Archie's birthday with tons of mentions that Meghan baked the lemon cake with lemons from her own backyard. However they stopped short of mentioning that she fertilized them herself.

by Anonymousreply 192May 17, 2023 5:37 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 193May 17, 2023 5:38 AM

Addendum R191:

. . . empty shells with no purpose other than to bolster Megs pubic image and monumental ego. And of course generate much-needed revenue flow. Though I can't imagine anyone with a functioning brain cell perusing any of Megs "project" sites and subsequently clicking the Donate icon.

by Anonymousreply 194May 17, 2023 5:41 AM

Just FYI, there is no such title/style as Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex.

by Anonymousreply 195May 17, 2023 5:41 AM

[Quote]Her ego is a vast, endless black hole that can never be filled.

So is her pussy.

by Anonymousreply 196May 17, 2023 5:43 AM

Judging by R193's image, Loving Kindness Senior Care Management received a substantial pay-in from Megs.

by Anonymousreply 197May 17, 2023 5:47 AM

I thought she’d had plastic surgery? No way, her face looks bad! There are no cheekbone implants! Her mandible is huge again! What the hell happened? I’m disappointed!

by Anonymousreply 198May 17, 2023 5:51 AM

r195, Meghan wants to establish her name in the divorced form, so that her bought American media and her bought American trollfarm won't have to change the form when she eventually decides that there is more money to be made from being a victimised wife/divorcee than a victimised in-law.

But yes, as she has no inherent title, the one she is given as grace-and-favour from the Crown is 'THE Duchess of Sussex', not her divorced name, which will be 'Meghan, Duchess of Sussex'.

by Anonymousreply 199May 17, 2023 5:51 AM

You're right, her mandible is indeed getting large again. So - not Ozempic but back to old reliable bulimia, making sure that Harry hears her retching up in the bathroom just like he had to Mummy do at Kensington Palace before she DIED?

"Take your baby by the ear, And play upon his darkest fear"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 200May 17, 2023 5:58 AM

Why does it look like Meghan has something on the bridge of her nose? Like a black makeup smudge but could be poorly covered freckles? Bruising from recent work?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 201May 17, 2023 6:16 AM

Doria has SO much more innate style and verve than Meghan does - that picture says it all.

I think they used to call it 'sangfroid'.

Meghan has MUCH to learn from her mother. If she's smart she's sitting at the former's knee every night and taking notes.

Except you know MM isn't, which is why she'll make unforced errors for the rest of her life.

Imagine if Doria, and not Meghan, was the right age and the one who studied, stalked and and eventially trapped Harry.

I suspect THAT would have been a "captive love" story for the ages. Perfect couple.

by Anonymousreply 202May 17, 2023 6:25 AM

^^^^The latter, not the former

by Anonymousreply 203May 17, 2023 6:30 AM

It’s so nice that Meghann brought the woman who raised her and made her into the success she’s become. Not everyone stays in such close contact with their mammy!

I just wish Megs had let her wear her usual head scarf instead of those black turds hanging off her head. Nothing wrong with looking like Aunt Jemima. She’s the ultimate mammy done well!!!

by Anonymousreply 204May 17, 2023 6:31 AM

But Megs DID study at Doria's knee. Everything Megs knows about grifting, ghosting, manipulation, and reeling the mark in she learned from Doria. Including that identifying as black is the quickest way to fortune and control.

by Anonymousreply 205May 17, 2023 6:31 AM

I would be embarrassed to accept what look like made up awards, she has no shame that minx

by Anonymousreply 206May 17, 2023 6:34 AM

DID Doria raise Meghan, r204? I hadn't heard.

Meghan's TIG blog archive swears otherwise. Oh yes. It's still on the deep archives, in all its dubious glory.

But I'm sure you know better, dear.

by Anonymousreply 207May 17, 2023 6:34 AM

Doria most certainly did NOT raise Megs. She was around for the first five or so years and then took off and left Megs to be raised by her father and various school/work adults.

by Anonymousreply 208May 17, 2023 6:39 AM

Meghan could hook up with Tom Cruise, he is desperate for a new mate. Acting like he is interested in Shakira. HA

by Anonymousreply 209May 17, 2023 6:47 AM

Meghan has surgeoned herself in to a kind of good looks, but her ego, combined with Doria's arrogance and Thomas' clumbsyness, will always, always tell on Meghan. She has no nuance, none of her mother's graceful charm and none of her father's blunderingly honest charm.

All she has is her promoters and her stylis- wait. Sorry.

She has no stylists.

My mistake.

by Anonymousreply 210May 17, 2023 6:59 AM

You are absolutely right r205. I am duly corrected.

by Anonymousreply 211May 17, 2023 7:10 AM

From Pag 13, Revenge by Tom Bower:

[quote] Their (Thomas and Doria) decision to marry on 23rd December, 1979 was unusual. At the time fewer than one white American man in a thousand was married to a Black woman. ‘When I married Doria,’ recalled Thomas, ‘people asked, “What colour will your baby be?”

One wonders if Megs heard that story from her father or mother and, being the grifter she is, filed it away for future use to her advantage. She eventually did use that exact line in her accusations of racism against the British Royal Family.

by Anonymousreply 212May 17, 2023 7:32 AM

^^^^ PagE

by Anonymousreply 213May 17, 2023 7:33 AM

Why did she get the left bunion cut off and leave the right one alone?

by Anonymousreply 214May 17, 2023 7:36 AM

Exactly r212, and her blundering father told her that story and the viper's first thought is how to weaponise it.

Imagine what she thought when she first fucked her way past the gates of Kensington Palace.

Most of of us would be admiring the architecture, but she, like a heat-seeking parasite, stood there and thought "How can I exploit this?"

by Anonymousreply 215May 17, 2023 7:38 AM

[quote] Most of of us would be admiring the architecture, but she, like a heat-seeking parasite, stood there and thought "How can I exploit this?"

Most of us are normal, rational beings. Megs is a narcissist. That's what narcissists do. Spent every waking moment calculating how they can exploit everyone/everything around them.

by Anonymousreply 216May 17, 2023 7:41 AM

That dress is ill fitting, just like her contrived persona. The material is ugly and she's too boxy for a style like that.

by Anonymousreply 217May 17, 2023 8:17 AM

There are ads for bananas at r175's link! The shape, cut and color of her dress make her look like a giant, walking banana!

by Anonymousreply 218May 17, 2023 8:18 AM

Meghan makes fashion blunders on purpose in order to generate negative headlines that will help her, a privileged hollywood spoilt person, to pose as a victim.

by Anonymousreply 219May 17, 2023 8:29 AM

[quote] Imagine what she thought when she first fucked her way past the gates of Kensington Palace.

[quote]Most of of us would be admiring the architecture

Bold of you to admit that you've been fantasizing about fucking your way into relevance.

by Anonymousreply 220May 17, 2023 8:32 AM


by Anonymousreply 221May 17, 2023 8:54 AM

Darfur Orphan is so grateful for the crumbs from the Duchess of Sussex's table!

by Anonymousreply 222May 17, 2023 9:07 AM

R193 they brought their maid???? Now that is pandering and tacky.

by Anonymousreply 223May 17, 2023 9:41 AM

"A poundshop Gwyneth Paltrow"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 224May 17, 2023 11:08 AM

I think she is too vain and self-important to wear ill-fitting, ugly clothes on purpose. I think she is just a know-it-all who thinks she knows better than any professional stylist, and (as another poster mentioned already) sees herself as having a tall, willowy supermodel body with "legs for miles."

by Anonymousreply 225May 17, 2023 11:31 AM

[Quote]Meghan could hook up with Tom Cruise, he is desperate for a new mate.

Don't be glib, R209! Tom may be desperate, but he's not dumb.

by Anonymousreply 226May 17, 2023 11:47 AM

R127 - The report needs to be release as the "Public" has a right to know the complete truth about this or any other Royal bully behavior allegations.

With respect to Jason Kanuf getting some Royal Palace Gong, this was just one upmanship by William rubbing Meghan & Harry's nose in Royal Shit and fanning the fires of the brotherly feud.

by Anonymousreply 227May 17, 2023 12:35 PM

R178 I think I love you.

by Anonymousreply 228May 17, 2023 12:59 PM

That dress is so fucking ugly. It looks like it was made out of a bedspread a la Scarlett O'Hara and her curtains.

by Anonymousreply 229May 17, 2023 1:13 PM

Harry looks positively schnockered in the pic at R201! He's got the Asian flush and a stupid grin and his eyes are glassy. He looked schnockered in the pics at the Lakers game, too. His face turns red as a drunken priest when he drinks.

by Anonymousreply 230May 17, 2023 1:25 PM

Doesn't Harry realize it looks like he's being held hostage by Markle and Mama?

by Anonymousreply 231May 17, 2023 1:31 PM

The people who support Meghan Markle, who actually believe that she is sincere and wonderful, seem to be missing a "BS detector." It blows my mind that anyone could observe her and feel sorry for her, or see anything good and true in her at all. Because it's obvious from space that she is a fraud. My BS detector goes berserk anytime I see her face, hear her voice or - God forbid - watch her "act."

by Anonymousreply 232May 17, 2023 1:48 PM

Gloria Steinem must have dementia. Marrying a titled man for money is the antithesis of feminism. Nothing Markle has ever done represents feminism.

by Anonymousreply 233May 17, 2023 1:49 PM

R232 her supporters - the real ones, not the troll farm - appear to be middle-aged black women desperate to think there are real black Queens and Princesses desired by rich white men. Got to be depressing for black women that rich black male celebs invariably marry blondes.

by Anonymousreply 234May 17, 2023 1:53 PM

R232 I neither support her nor care much about complete strangers who don't affect my life one whit but I am curious why you klan grannies are so bitter and vested in her. You act like a jealous lover scorned. You all seem like Annie Wilkes and Alex Forrest rolled into one. It's not normal even for fangurls. It's psychotic.

by Anonymousreply 235May 17, 2023 2:09 PM

Their spokesman has now announced they had an almost catastrophic run-in with the paps in NYC!!! Getting self-serving publicity should be a safe pastime.

Biden, give them a secret service detail to protect the King and Queen of Santa Barbara County!!

by Anonymousreply 236May 17, 2023 2:30 PM

You mean the paps she called?

by Anonymousreply 237May 17, 2023 2:35 PM

R235. She used her public role solely for personal profit and politicised it. She’s like Ivamka Trump and Her husband in that respect. Is it klannish to butch about them?

She also tried to undermine the lifelong work of a beloved public figure as she was dying for no reason other than greed or vanity. That also motivates people to comment.

Plus, she’s nasty in such a clownish way it’s enjoyable to mock her. Since she’s a vile person who insists we notice her, it’s all good clean fun.

by Anonymousreply 238May 17, 2023 2:53 PM

Markle is everywhere.

And DL helped put her there.

Congratulations fellas. And DL dames.

by Anonymousreply 239May 17, 2023 2:53 PM

"Biden, give them a secret service detail to protect the King and Queen of Santa Barbara County!!"

R236 - What are you talking about? Do you have a link the POTUS gave (granted) them anything???? NO?: That is exactly what I thought.

Why are you making things up just like The Daily Fail and The Dim?

by Anonymousreply 240May 17, 2023 3:33 PM

As widdle Harry wants his IPP status back, he would get secret service protection. Paid for by the US taxpayer for a couple of attention whores.

by Anonymousreply 241May 17, 2023 3:36 PM

R241 - Harry will never be granted personal Secret Service Protection paid for by the US taxpayer.

How did you come up with this theory???? Sounds like something dreamed-up by The Daily Fail Online, The Dim or The Slow.

by Anonymousreply 242May 17, 2023 3:42 PM

R242 dumb person, senior members of the British Royal Family have IPP status which means wherever they travel, local authorities have to foot the bill for their security, for driving them in motorcades in keeping with their status, getting them special privileges to arrive straight at their plane in airports, etc. Dumb Harry forgot when he left the Royals he'd lose his very useful IPP status. That's what he's after. He doesn't give a shit about security. He wants to be treated like a king and not obliged to rub shoulders with the proletariat.

by Anonymousreply 243May 17, 2023 3:52 PM

Good lord, are these psychotic cunts now claiming H&M are getting SS protection? That's hilarious. Not only crazy but dumb and gullible.

by Anonymousreply 244May 17, 2023 4:29 PM

R243 - Harry understands he does not have IPP status in the USA because he is no longer a senior working British Royal. To my knowledge, Harry has never ask the USA government for any type of private security. Do you have a link stating otherwise?

I am not a "dumb" person. I simply do not understand the reasoning or facts behind posting a comment regarding the POTUS, the Secret Service, and the Sussexes regarding private engagements and private events.

by Anonymousreply 245May 17, 2023 4:30 PM

R129 Do your parents know you are on the internet when you are supposed to be doing your homework?

by Anonymousreply 246May 17, 2023 4:35 PM

I can't afford to fund a war AND give these two Secret Service protection. Are they even US citizens?

by Anonymousreply 247May 17, 2023 4:35 PM

[Quote]What are you talking about? Do you have a link the POTUS gave (granted) them anything???? NO?: That is exactly what I thought.

Jesus Christ. The previous poster was making a joke saying "Biden! Give them security!"

Not "Biden GAVE them security". Learn to read.

by Anonymousreply 248May 17, 2023 4:43 PM

They left Canada when we stopped footing the bill

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 249May 17, 2023 4:48 PM

Harry thought the royals would continue to pay for him. He said it in his Spare book that he was shocked to lose his British security when he left. He isnt terribly bright.

Now they are releasing stories about nearly dying from paps chasing them:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 250May 17, 2023 5:07 PM

I thought this Ari Emmanuel dude from WME was some kind of genius in his field? Hertz car rental, taxi cabs, staged traffic skirmishes and a supposed stalker outside their Olive Garden mansion is the best he can come up with for his new superstar client and her gold dress which resembles the fabric of my nonna's throw pillows on her plastic covered sofa ca. 1967.

by Anonymousreply 251May 17, 2023 5:09 PM

Her memories are so carefully curated for the occasion:

Meghan took the stage on Tuesday evening to give her acceptance speech, in which she said, "As a young girl, I would come home, I'd settle in after a day of school, pull up my TV tray with dinner and I would turn on my evening ritual: Jeopardy! And I'd glance at the coffee table, where I'd see an array of things: it could be the cat's collar, my homework, some mail that had just been brought in — and some magazines. The magazines said Ms. on them."

"I remember them vividly because the pictures were different. There was diversity that I hadn't seen as often, both of color and of age and the names were different," she continued. "There were congresswomen, there were astronauts and the topics were different — from mothering to being a working mom to heavier topics such as domestic violence, the poverty line, unearthing its roots, where it comes from and matters of equity."

"I was too young at the time to know what most of it meant," Meghan said, adding that despite that, "the significance of these magazines was important."

Her mom, Meghan said, "had a subscription and having these pages in our home, it signaled to me that there was just so much more than the dolled-up covers and the images that you would see on the grocery store covers."

"It signaled to me that substance mattered," she added.

by Anonymousreply 252May 17, 2023 5:16 PM

She should add the fact that her mom was a cheating, pot smoking, weed dealing deadbeat who was never around to raise her.

by Anonymousreply 253May 17, 2023 5:38 PM

Couldn't her new PR people tell her that it's possible to give a speech that isn't about yourself?

by Anonymousreply 254May 17, 2023 5:41 PM

I tried to get some photos of them last night in their car. But I couldn't keep up.

by Anonymousreply 255May 17, 2023 5:46 PM

Being chased or not chased is easily verifiable. Were there witnesses? If true, probably. Too early to accuse them of fake stories though I know you old bags will run with it with no logic involved.

by Anonymousreply 256May 17, 2023 5:51 PM

The paparazzi were trying to get away from the Markles.

by Anonymousreply 257May 17, 2023 5:51 PM

"Harry thought the royals would continue to pay for him. He said it in his Spare book that he was shocked to lose his British security when he left. He isn't terribly bright."

R250 - You make a great point. Harry really thought that as long as his family was in a Commonwealth Country, security would be provided. I really do not think Harry thought this all the way through. However, when security was no longer provided, it made no sense to stay in Canada if they did not really want to be in Canada.

by Anonymousreply 258May 17, 2023 5:52 PM

[quote]"It signaled to me that substance mattered," she added.

In retrospect, it's clear that it was "Ms." that inspired her to become a suitcase girl on "Deal or No Deal."

by Anonymousreply 259May 17, 2023 6:03 PM

Would Grandpa Tom seek custody of Archie and Lilibet if all three had perished in the catastrophic chase?

by Anonymousreply 260May 17, 2023 6:06 PM

Mayor of NY just said on CBC News in Canada they he "would be surprised if there was a high speed chase in NY for 2 hours". NYPD is saying the scene was more chaotic rather than a chase.

Also, if paps are chasing you for 2 hours doesnt that indicate your security team sucks ass?? Where were they and why couldnt they get you to a hotel?

by Anonymousreply 261May 17, 2023 6:12 PM

Well, Steinem started out as a Playboy Bunny, r259.

by Anonymousreply 262May 17, 2023 6:23 PM

[quote] Would Grandpa Tom seek custody of Archie and Lilibet if all three had perished in the catastrophic chase?


I doubt that their British grandparent would want them.

He's never even met them.

Plus, there's that other thing....

by Anonymousreply 263May 17, 2023 6:26 PM

Is some of this shit related to her switching to William Morris or whatever it was?

The claim of the big dinner with celebs, that they later denied? The Ms magazine award by the senile Steinem? The "fabulous" gold gown to try to rival Kate's tour de force? The car chase that the mayor of NYC denied?

Do they want to ruin their PR agency rep?

by Anonymousreply 264May 17, 2023 6:28 PM

Grandpa Tom is elderly and very unfit, if not at death's door. WTF? I think one of the half-sibs is more likely than Tom. But I imagine the BRF would take over. But enough of wishful thinking. We're stuck with this loser, like our many other miscreants, like the Trump family or the Kardashians.

by Anonymousreply 265May 17, 2023 6:31 PM

Why would a cat's collar be on a coffee table? And I thought Doria left. Why would she be getting magazines sent to her former address?

by Anonymousreply 266May 17, 2023 6:32 PM

Steinem went undercover as a bunny for a month, on assignment for "Show" magazine. Her resulting articles were an expose.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 267May 17, 2023 6:49 PM

r264 Oh Did Gwyneth Paltrow and Cameron Diaz deny it?

by Anonymousreply 268May 17, 2023 6:51 PM

R245 it isn't the US government that classifies a foreigner as an IPP. It's the British Home Office for Brits. Which is another reason Harry Smollett is suing them.

by Anonymousreply 269May 17, 2023 7:32 PM

The whole story is WEIRD. Reports are saying they (Doria, Meghan, Harry) went to a police station for protection. Where was their security?? Then they allegedly flagged down a yellow cab to get away but that was spotted too. Cab driver says there was no chase. They supposedly couldnt go back to their friends place. Why not just go straight to a hotel? Also they have been to NY before and none of this stuff happened in the past. I think this is more bullshit to get the royals to bend to their wishes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 270May 17, 2023 7:35 PM

R270 Meghan auditioning to play Nancy Reagan in My Ronald, My Prince!

by Anonymousreply 271May 17, 2023 7:37 PM

‘Yes, substance mattered. And I would go on in life to shell out tens of thousands of dollars on PR firms to make it look like I had some.’

by Anonymousreply 272May 17, 2023 8:25 PM

Gloria Steinam actually went undercover to expose sexism at the Playboy clubs.

by Anonymousreply 273May 17, 2023 9:21 PM

In Harkleland, sitting in NYC traffic for two hours surrounded by people with their cellphones out = "being pursued by paparazzi".

How convenient that this never happens in their adopted hometown, aka the high-speed pursuit capital of the world.

by Anonymousreply 274May 17, 2023 9:33 PM

[quote]Her mom, Meghan said, "had a subscription and having these pages in our home, it signaled to me that there was just so much more than the dolled-up covers and the images that you would see on the grocery store covers. It signaled to me that substance mattered."

Uh huh.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 275May 17, 2023 9:38 PM

If substance mattered to Meghan Markle, and she learned early on that there was more to life than getting "dolled up," she wouldn't have asked Prince Charles to fork out $100,000 for an engagement dress she wore in one photo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 276May 17, 2023 9:45 PM

R177, what struck me about that whole passage was that is was her typical M.O. of spinning vague bullshit into something that might sound meaningful if you weren't really listening. It's a descriptive collection of thoughts that have nothing to do with anything. Basically, what she's saying is, "We had the magazine on the table and I noticed it there." Nothing about having actually read it or even knowing what was in it. Only its appearance that, 30 years later, she would dredge from her memory banks to pretend that Ms Magazine held any significance for her before she latched onto Steinem.

by Anonymousreply 277May 17, 2023 10:55 PM

Uppity Negress obsessive-compulsive shitposting thread #34,155,295A

by Anonymousreply 278May 17, 2023 11:07 PM

Gold-digging, yacht-girling, Queen killing, never-higher-than-sixth-on-the-call-sheet cable tv C-lister shitposter and silly defender of narcissists at R278.

by Anonymousreply 279May 17, 2023 11:13 PM

[quote] [R264] Oh Did Gwyneth Paltrow and Cameron Diaz deny it?

Indeed they have R268, both of them deny being with the SouthParkles in Montecito for sushi (or anything else).

by Anonymousreply 280May 17, 2023 11:16 PM

r280 Interesting!Do you have a link please?

by Anonymousreply 281May 17, 2023 11:41 PM

[quote] both of them deny being with the SouthParkles

How embarrassing.

How.... embarrassing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 282May 17, 2023 11:47 PM

Imagine stalking Cameron Diaz for a sushi-chain photo op.

Then receiving an award for.... what? Being visible? Throwing a little money at causes for the awards it brings?

And then pretending that you're a clown being chased to death, as if you're alone in Central Park at night on a unicycle.

WE WANT OUR PRIVACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 283May 17, 2023 11:54 PM

Just in case you don't believe that Meghan is being harassed....

And please take note of the British accent of the person yelling insults at her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 284May 18, 2023 12:07 AM

R284 Meghan had hecklers because she is a raging asshole and we all know it now. This did not happen before her true self was revealed.

by Anonymousreply 285May 18, 2023 12:33 AM

R284 when “celebrities” appear in public they take the risk of encountering members of the public who may ask what in this case was a very legitimate question. The public has the right to say anything and the “celebrity” has the right not to respond, which she exercised.

Don’t want to encounter the public? Don’t appear in public. Or stay in Montecito - I’m sure that they have a much better class of heckler over there.

What does the accent of the heckler have to do with anything? New York City is heaving with Brits.

by Anonymousreply 286May 18, 2023 12:41 AM

r284 The heckler was a hell of a lot nicer than he could have been. He asked her 'How does it feel to be from two broken families?"

He could have more precisely asked her 'How does it feel to be responsible for the break up of not one but two families?'.

by Anonymousreply 287May 18, 2023 12:50 AM

R284 is an idiot.

This cunt deserves being called out because she's an insane egotist no better than other malignant narcissists who lack decency - while playing the Princess of Decency.

Cynical cunt.

by Anonymousreply 288May 18, 2023 12:53 AM

The truth hurts. Doesn’t it R284?

by Anonymousreply 289May 18, 2023 12:55 AM

And her clothes are terrible.

If Markle is Diana's revenge, she's Diana's revenge on Harry first and foremost. The day will come when his shit-for-brains pride will take him down, and Markle will step on him to seem taller "on her own."

by Anonymousreply 290May 18, 2023 12:56 AM

She reminds me of Jodi Arias.

by Anonymousreply 291May 18, 2023 1:16 AM

I just looked at her speech. Aside from the obviously made up anecdotes, who the fuck wrote this? "Charter a path". Can someone explain what this is supposed to mean? Presumably a path is not the same as a ship.

One can certainly chart a course, but "charter a path" is pure, unadulterated bullshit. As is 'you can be the visionary of your own life.' Meaningless. Then there's the wandering syntax, which gets lost after 'what you repeat in your own daily acts of service', the subject of a clause which is never completed.

The whole thing is the epitome of faux-inspirational-sounding noise from an obvious charlatan who cannot even speak the English language properly.

by Anonymousreply 292May 18, 2023 1:21 AM

[quote] The whole thing is the epitome of faux-inspirational-sounding noise from an obvious charlatan who cannot even speak the English language properly.

If you think that Meghan is alone in this, you're sadly mistaken.

There is an entire industry built around this type of new-age enlightened bullshit, and it's a multi-million dollar industry.

And MANY Americans buy into it.

I, however, am not one of those people. But it's certainly out there.

by Anonymousreply 293May 18, 2023 1:27 AM

She is like the ultimate hun of all.

by Anonymousreply 294May 18, 2023 1:28 AM

I can’t believe they came to NYC - like 100s of celebs before them - and somehow THEY were almost killed by paparazzi and had to go to a POLICE STATION?!? Then get in a TAXI? Dear God someone make them stop.

I wish I could just ignore it but the manipulation of political sensitivity burns me. Using social awareness as a cover for egocentric money grabs is just so offensive. Stay home - count your millions (which apparently is still not enough$ to live on?)- donate to worthy causes and AVOID media events where the whole POINT is to get attention.

by Anonymousreply 295May 18, 2023 1:39 AM

Dear Matt Stone and Trey Parker,


Whatever! Whatever!

I do what I want!

With all my hate,

Meghan's Worldwide Privacy Tour

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 296May 18, 2023 1:43 AM

R295 IKR

by Anonymousreply 297May 18, 2023 1:56 AM

I love the hilarious tangled webs they weave, but, as transparently fake as the tales are, I think both H & M believe they are real and that they are compelled to speak their carefully fabricated "truths" to support their heroic "narrative."

I picture Doria rolling her eyes and thinking, "But I never subscribed to Ms., honey: that was MAD magazine on my fucking coffee table, and if you had ever bothered to read it, you might have developed a sense of humor and some substance."

by Anonymousreply 298May 18, 2023 2:17 AM

r292 when called out on misuing the word "archetype" Meghan responded by saying she just loved words so much she often made up new and more interesting definitions - INTENTIONALLY of course. Madame never has made a faux pas, mind you.

by Anonymousreply 299May 18, 2023 2:24 AM

* misusing.

I obviously do make faux pas.

by Anonymousreply 300May 18, 2023 2:30 AM

How long until we get receipts that neither Doria or Thomas ever subscribed to Ms. Magazine? And that they never had a cat?

Her stories are so poorly thought out, it's actually sad.

by Anonymousreply 301May 18, 2023 2:30 AM

Any updates on CEO Doria's Loving Kindness Senior Care Agency or is that just a front for money laundering?

by Anonymousreply 302May 18, 2023 3:00 AM

I believe here was a French documentary recently on Archewell and its shady financials but I havent seen it yet. Has anyone watched it?

by Anonymousreply 303May 18, 2023 3:14 AM

To be honest Im half expecting Meghan & Harry to come out with a "this is why we should have rented a car with Hertz!" commercial after their "dangerous chase".

by Anonymousreply 304May 18, 2023 3:17 AM

I think you're on to something, R304. It's the only way to make any sense of this sheer fuckery!

It might even make them somewhat likeable.

by Anonymousreply 305May 18, 2023 3:23 AM

[quote] I believe here was a French documentary recently on Archewell and its shady financials but I havent seen it yet. Has anyone watched it?

Is it anything like King Charles III receiving millions of Euros in suitcases from the Saudis?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 306May 18, 2023 3:34 AM

The French documentary made it very obvious Archewell doesn't actually exist. It's like a mailbox in Delaware. Are they actually money laundering or just pretending to exist? All those Delaware shell companies, usually opened to hide financial transactions.

by Anonymousreply 307May 18, 2023 4:17 AM

I saw the French documentary - the went to the supposed "offices" and there was nobody there. No employees, no office equipment. Zilch.

by Anonymousreply 308May 18, 2023 7:16 AM

Maybe they work from home, R308.

by Anonymousreply 309May 18, 2023 7:35 AM

Sure, honey. That's why they pay rent for office space. So everyone can work from home.

by Anonymousreply 310May 18, 2023 7:44 AM

R307 doesn’t know the first thing about shit. I have a Delaware corporation. The agent’s address is Delaware. I have no employees. It is only there for my professionals services—those amounts go through the company. There are hundreds of thousands of entities just like that. It is done in the ordinary course of business every fucking day.

by Anonymousreply 311May 18, 2023 9:44 AM

I rarely listen to entire news stories when I get an Alexa alert BUT when I heard their "Catastrophic chase by the press in fucking NEW YORK" headline, I just HAD to... it just feels like THEY (aka SHE) is a bottomless pit. I don't care what anybody says, she doesn't have a genuine bone in her body. And he's just an idiot.

She must REALLY know how to work a prostate.

by Anonymousreply 312May 18, 2023 9:58 AM

Every fucking celebrity who has walked around NYC must be shaking their head at these two drama queens.

by Anonymousreply 313May 18, 2023 10:09 AM

The gayling Royal Reporter is so delicious in this.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 314May 18, 2023 10:15 AM

Is no one commenting on how unflattering that gold dress was on Meg?

by Anonymousreply 315May 18, 2023 10:21 AM

Darling we long upthread identified what her cosplay costume was: refrigerator in gold leaf.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 316May 18, 2023 10:29 AM

I wonder if Harry will ever come to blame Meghan? He’s the one traumatized by paparazzi and camera flashes. He has to contrast it with their relatively uneventful life in California. It was her thirst for awards that brought them to NYC. Who crafted that overwrought statement?

by Anonymousreply 317May 18, 2023 10:42 AM

[quote]The French documentary made it very obvious Archewell doesn't actually exist. It's like a mailbox in Delaware.

That's pretty common because of the tax benefits of having corporations registered in Delaware. It's been like that for quite some time and you'll find a lot of corps and charitable orgs registered there. There's no tax penalty to register in Delaware but operate in another state.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 318May 18, 2023 10:42 AM

What is love?

by Anonymousreply 319May 18, 2023 10:43 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 320May 18, 2023 10:45 AM

Wrong thread, imbecile at r320

by Anonymousreply 321May 18, 2023 10:49 AM

They’re obviously 🙄 not getting enough attention in Montecito, so they have to make these forays outside of the gated community to stir up troubles.

But, they’re almost crazy fun camp. They are their own self invented Marx Brothers’ movie 🍿. John Waters should not let this opportunity go by and should chase them around in a car 🚗 🚙 🎥 while filming them

by Anonymousreply 322May 18, 2023 10:53 AM


by Anonymousreply 323May 18, 2023 11:00 AM

So was becoming a subject of mockery to the entire world on her "Vision Board"?

by Anonymousreply 324May 18, 2023 11:06 AM

But, r311, is your entity also considered a foundation?

by Anonymousreply 325May 18, 2023 11:14 AM

These two are really going downhill.

by Anonymousreply 326May 18, 2023 11:21 AM

The Tripping Royals

by Anonymousreply 327May 18, 2023 11:32 AM

The Duke & Duchess of Helter Skelter

by Anonymousreply 328May 18, 2023 11:44 AM

The number of basement dwellers on DL has certainly skyrocketed.

by Anonymousreply 329May 18, 2023 11:55 AM

Openly called out

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 330May 18, 2023 12:02 PM

R328 Scramblehead & Lulu

by Anonymousreply 331May 18, 2023 12:07 PM

Lulu & Scramblehead take New York 🌃

by Anonymousreply 332May 18, 2023 12:21 PM

Mayor Eric Adams just appeared on Morning Joe. He smiled and laughed when Joe openly mocked, with faux "investigative" questions to the mayor, the "chased" incident.

When you lose Morning Joe....

What a blundering over-reach by the Sussexes and their PR team.

I'm all for image control, self-promotion, deliberate paparazzi bait appearances, etc. whether real, fake, what-have-you.

That's all part of the fun of observing the famous and notorious and how they hope to stay that way. I know it for what it is when I see it.

But still, even I have standards. I expect, and, quite frankly, deserve, a level of skill deployed.

Releasing that statement was amateurish and is now, rightly, being ridiculed.

by Anonymousreply 333May 18, 2023 12:50 PM

Forgot to add at r333-

And, that the Sussexes thought this was something they could pull-off successfully is an act of implied contempt for their audience.

The Sussexes have had a damn good run. I've enjoyed the ride. But, while I'll put-up with obvious spotlight mongering, I draw the line at being insulted.

Turn the oven to OFF. Done.

by Anonymousreply 334May 18, 2023 12:57 PM

R284 - People in the USA have a right to protest or at least they do right know. (No telling what DeSatan might do in Florida) .

You can yell anything you want as long you do do not cause bodily harm. The "protesters" at the January 6th Insurrection, who are now in jail playing with their puds, either caused bodily harm or conspired to cause bodily harm. In the UK, I think it is called GBH (Grievous Bodily Harm; learned this binge watching Vera)

Grievous bodily harm (GBH) is when someone intentionally or recklessly inflicts serious bodily harm on someone else. Yelling is NOT inflicting bodily harm.

If I want the 'right" to yell at Trump or DeSatan, I must extend that same right to the Sussexes, assorted Klan Grannies and garden variety Karens.

by Anonymousreply 335May 18, 2023 1:21 PM

R335 -Should be : ^^^ "Sussex haters, assorted Klan Grannies and garden variety Karens." ^^^

by Anonymousreply 336May 18, 2023 1:36 PM

R311 now i know you are a stupid klannie. A “foundation,” i.e., a 501c3 tax-exempt entity—NO MATTER WHERE IT WAS FORMED—is subject to IRS reporting rules and filings…that makes it more transparent, not less.

by Anonymousreply 337May 18, 2023 1:37 PM

^ correction: For R325

by Anonymousreply 338May 18, 2023 1:39 PM

Harry is not merely dumb. He's dumb, paranoid, vindicative and has far too much access to the media, considering how poorly educated he is.

She lies every time she opens her mouth. Imagine getting an award for being a "woman of vision" and then lecturing your audience on how they can spire to be just like you, except she left out the gold-digging. ghosting and plastic surgery.

The only magazine Doria ever subscribed to is High Times.

by Anonymousreply 339May 18, 2023 1:53 PM

Participation Trophies 🏆 Gone Wild

by Anonymousreply 340May 18, 2023 2:17 PM

Today show had a segment on the "conflicting" reports on Harry and Meghan's alleged brush with 'near catastrophe'.

Funniest thing is their bodyguard/spokesman claiming that was the scariest night of his life!

I look forward to Backgrid bringing the receipts for all the times Meghan has called them to 'harass' her with pap shots.

Dumb and Dumber ain't ready for primetime.

by Anonymousreply 341May 18, 2023 2:34 PM

I don’t think backgrid will turn on her, this is their job and they don’t want to alienate their other customers by spilling the beans. I do think they may avoid her in the future.

by Anonymousreply 342May 18, 2023 2:50 PM

were they in a hotel on the UES? report mentioned they were in a private residence in UES. Apparently, one of their own, a SUV was driving recklessly, and was stopped by cops.

by Anonymousreply 343May 18, 2023 3:10 PM

Wasn’t it just Gayle and Oprah chasing them in disguise 🦸🏽‍♀️🧔🏽

by Anonymousreply 344May 18, 2023 3:32 PM

The View let 'em have it today and the ladies of The View are usually devoted Harry & Meghan fangirls. Even Sunny was making fun of them. They really fucked themselves with this one.

by Anonymousreply 345May 18, 2023 5:53 PM

No one mentioned how awful Meghan looks in that gold dress?

The dress accentuates that she has a body and legs like SpongeBob Squarepants.

by Anonymousreply 346May 18, 2023 6:00 PM

This whole "catastrophic" car chase is really off the charts creepy and deranged.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if she was willing to sacrifice her own mother in some staged car crash so she can make that her new victim platform. "They killed my mother like they killed Harry's mother and it's all the RF's fault because they didn't provide security. They OWE me." I don't think I'm stretching too far by saying this, the diabolical duo are both that ill. Narcs/Sociopaths will go to horrifying extremes to WIN without blinking an eye.

I've had an active interest in this whole narcissistic royal saga because she reminds me so much of the narc who married into my family, they all use the same playbook. However, this contrived "catastrophic" car chase cosplaying Diana is just too dark and sick and wasting so many public resources. I'm going to take a long break from commenting on and "clicking" about them. I'll come back when the divorce saga begins because I really want to see beady eyed Harry annihilated. I loathe him more than her.

by Anonymousreply 347May 18, 2023 6:01 PM

Meghan must have planned this so carefully with her fave paps at Backgrid. Unfortunately, Meghan knows jack shit about NYC. As somebody on The View pointed out, the story they told would be believable in LA but not in NYC.

by Anonymousreply 348May 18, 2023 6:23 PM

South Park has got to do an episode on this. Didn't they get mega-publicity for the Worldwide Privacy Tour episode? I want to see Cartman and his pals accidentally out riding their trikes as the motorcade went by and have the Harkles through a massive hissy fit about it. My god it writes itself. (can't wait to see their version of her gold upholstery gown)

by Anonymousreply 349May 18, 2023 6:23 PM

R349 Southpark could do a whole miniseries on these 2 with their shenanigans.

by Anonymousreply 350May 18, 2023 6:25 PM

They could have one of the Harkle security vans ride up on the sidewalk to try to hit a kid - and then play the victim. (isn't that sort of what actually happened?)

And why do you have four security vehicles - and instead, jump in a yellow cab (and NOT buckle your seatbelt btw - mama's boy didn't fall far from the tree)?

by Anonymousreply 351May 18, 2023 6:29 PM

Backgrid accused one of their 'security' cars of driving recklessly. And at this point, I believe the paps more than the Drama Queens.

by Anonymousreply 352May 18, 2023 7:08 PM

They have to realize that they are laughingstocks. Where do they go from here?

by Anonymousreply 353May 18, 2023 7:10 PM

It IS a South Park episode. Like they took the script and acted it out. Any sympathy they had just evaporated.

by Anonymousreply 354May 18, 2023 7:15 PM

r352 Backgrid have made a real Slap down statement to Harry and Meghan’s lawyer after the couple apparently are demanding the agency hand all of the photos to them. Seems they are nervous of the public seeing evidence of how unremarkable the incident was.

by Anonymousreply 355May 18, 2023 7:19 PM

R355 - Where di you get this bit of information?

by Anonymousreply 356May 18, 2023 7:20 PM

Here we go statement from Backgrid lawyers advising the Harkles lawyers they tell the Harkles that in this country royals cannot demand members of the public surrender their private property to them.


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 357May 18, 2023 7:22 PM

R357 - Thanks for the link!

by Anonymousreply 358May 18, 2023 7:24 PM

Some security guard at their McMansion in California made a 'citizen's arrest' of some guy for loitering outside their gates. I smell a lawsuit!

by Anonymousreply 359May 18, 2023 7:25 PM

Maybe they did this to "prove" to King Charles that they need the security they're asking for.

But it was a plan that failed massively.

by Anonymousreply 360May 18, 2023 7:51 PM

I love the fact London didn't bother to respond to the Harkles' hair-raising misadventures! Harry's the Little Prince who cried wolf one too many times.

by Anonymousreply 361May 18, 2023 7:54 PM

R360 - The security Harry is asking for is in the UK.

by Anonymousreply 362May 18, 2023 7:54 PM

R362 - nah, he wants IPP status in which case he'd have his security paid here too - not to mention get all the extra perks the spoiled brat thinks he's entitled to

by Anonymousreply 363May 18, 2023 8:43 PM

R337, r338: You have *no* business calling anyone stupid when you link to your own post with what you must assume to be a scathing reply. Got your panties in a bunch defending the Harkles?

by Anonymousreply 364May 18, 2023 10:06 PM

R337 are you having a seizure hun? I’ll call the paramedics. I just hope you’re not stuck in NYC taxi because then it’ll take a while to get to you. You know how traffic is.

by Anonymousreply 365May 18, 2023 10:16 PM

Excuse me, cunts at R364 and R365, but I thought this thread was about ME???

Let's get back to talking about ME!

by Anonymousreply 366May 18, 2023 11:33 PM

R366 So sorry, dear. Are you OK?

by Anonymousreply 367May 19, 2023 12:30 AM

What an absolute shitshow. This stunt cost them the approval of the View ladies.

They even lost the fucking retards who present THE VIEW.

How is that even possible?

by Anonymousreply 368May 19, 2023 5:16 AM

CNN interviewed the cab driver who dropped them off at the NY precinct and he was like "We took a left and another left and I dropped them off." I'm paraphrasing but it was apparent there was nothing traumatic about his part of the ordeal.

by Anonymousreply 369May 19, 2023 10:09 AM

Harry & Meghan’s NYC ‘car chase’ happened because they were too cheap to pay for hotel: source

by Anonymousreply 370May 19, 2023 6:03 PM

The entitled couple allegedly demanded the Carlyle — the late Princess Diana’s favorite hotel — give them a discounted room for their New York City visit this week.

According to law enforcement sources, bosses at the Carlyle refused the hefty discount, so the embattled pair instead stayed at a friend’s house on the Upper East Side.

But when the paparazzi began following them Tuesday night from the Ziegfeld theater — in what their spokesperson claimed was a “relentless pursuit, lasting over two hours” — the duo didn’t want to lead the photographers back to their friend’s home and reveal where they were staying.

by Anonymousreply 371May 19, 2023 6:04 PM

A New York City law enforcement source told Page Six: “They should have just gotten a hotel for the safety of everyone. Instead, they were cheap and wanted a free place to stay.”

According to the source, “Harry and Meghan’s people called the Carlyle ahead of the trip and asked for a discounted room, and the hotel said no.

“If they had just paid up and got a hotel in the first place, this supposed ‘dangerous’ paparazzi chase around town would never have happened. They would have been driven back to the Carlyle, been photographed going inside and that would have been the end of it.”

In the past, Harry and Meghan have been regulars at the Carlyle, where rooms go from around $1,240 and suites up to $6,000 a night. They checked into the iconic hotel during a visit to New York in 2021, and were seen dining at the hotel’s famed Bemelmans Bar.

by Anonymousreply 372May 19, 2023 6:04 PM

[quote] A New York City law enforcement source told Page Six: “They should have just gotten a hotel for the safety of everyone. Instead, they were cheap and wanted a free place to stay.”

[quote] According to the source, “Harry and Meghan’s people called the Carlyle ahead of the trip and asked for a discounted room, and the hotel said no.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 373May 19, 2023 6:13 PM

However, following their allegations, eyewitnesses claimed the couple exaggerated the incident, and they were not followed for two hours.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination, and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries or arrests in regard,” the New York City Police Department said in a statement on Wednesday.

“Harry and Meghan put regular people’s lives at risk because they are cheap,” the law-enforcement source told Page Six. They should just accept that people are going to take photos of them, photographers are going to follow them — this is New York — and they have to take intelligent steps to ensure their own security for the safety of themselves and everyone else.”

Reps for Harry and Meghan didn’t get back to us. Reps for the Carlyle did not comment.

by Anonymousreply 374May 19, 2023 6:18 PM

Royal pals are ‘mocking’ Harry, Meghan over ‘hysterical’ NYC car chase story

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 375May 19, 2023 6:29 PM

Those two certainly think highly of themselves. They're constantly issuing demands for this and that. Next they will demand a public apology from the Carlyle for not giving them a discount.

by Anonymousreply 376May 19, 2023 6:36 PM

So La Markle is fucking the bodyguard? How like our Dear Departed Queen of Hearts is the Queen of Hertz.

by Anonymousreply 377May 19, 2023 7:37 PM

Why are they demanding a discounted room? Are they poor?

by Anonymousreply 378May 19, 2023 8:38 PM

It's so gross that they keep going back to the Carlyle because it was "Diana's favorite hotel in NY." Talk about "three in a marriage"! Does he do anything with his wife without having Mummy in mind?

by Anonymousreply 379May 19, 2023 9:20 PM

rich, entitled celebs always try to get discounts and shit. Carlyle is well known and doesn't need recognition from these useless cunts. They don't need them

by Anonymousreply 380May 19, 2023 10:01 PM

Shouldn't the Women of Vision award have arranged for their hotel accommodation, as usually happens when one is an invited guest?

by Anonymousreply 381May 19, 2023 10:52 PM

So no pics of them arriving or leaving NYC on a commercial flight from their fellow travellers? Which means they took private jets and no doubt couldn't afford the Carlyle once they'd paid for that. They live way beyond their means and I'm assuming money is getting very tight.

by Anonymousreply 382May 19, 2023 11:14 PM

These new details about The Carlyle make them look even more tacky and pathetic. How much lower can they go?

by Anonymousreply 383May 20, 2023 1:29 AM

Can't imagine Diana asking anyone to comp her anything. She was privileged but nowhere near as entitled as the Harkles.

by Anonymousreply 384May 20, 2023 1:50 AM

I pity the poor assistant who had to tell Duchess Doritos that the Carlyle told them to fuck off

by Anonymousreply 385May 20, 2023 2:12 AM

[quote]I saw the French documentary - the went to the supposed "offices" and there was nobody there. No employees, no office equipment. Zilch.

We were "in between" employees. I had fired everyone.

by Anonymousreply 386May 20, 2023 2:28 AM

[quote]Shouldn't the Women of Vision award have arranged for their hotel accommodation, as usually happens when one is an invited guest?

I doubt it's an actual organization, but just something "Glo" Steinem hosts when she wants to award her 'incredible' friends. In her speech, Markle said they have an incredible friendship.

by Anonymousreply 387May 20, 2023 2:41 AM

The Duke and Duchess of Smollett.

by Anonymousreply 388May 20, 2023 2:41 AM

DailyMail.com: “Fatuous, irrelevant, and no sense of purpose – what a fitting backdrop Manhattan’s ‘Women of Vision’ made for the vapid La Markle herself! Fellow guest Maureen Callahan’s sparkling account of Meghan’s word-salad gala appearance.

...Meghan climbed on stage to the Alicia Keys she-ro anthem ‘Girl on Fire’ – and then… a whole lot of nothing. Verbiage and word salad that were content-free, except when speaking on her favorite subject: herself. Here, in real time, we observed Meghan’s inability to read a room. She thanked ‘the other honorees’ without naming them. ‘Congratulations,” she said, ‘and frankly, well deserved.’ It was all so smug and supercilious, this glorified podcaster telling these boots-on-the-ground activists…

There was the cringe-inducing humblebrag, calling her new friend Gloria ‘Glo’… It’s ‘Glo” to Meghan but Meghan is ‘Duchess’ to us… The crowd was checking their watches… Her speech didn’t even deliver fresh content! She repeated the story, as told on her podcast, of poor little Meghan coming home from wschool to her TV dinner, cat collars and copies of Ms. Magazine strewn about courtesy of her mother… ‘Change is just one action away’ ‘You can be the visionary of your own life’ ‘Daily acts of service, in kindness, in advocacy, grace, and in fairness.’ ‘The imprints that were forged in my mind – I can now connect the dots in a much better way to understand how I became a young feminist and evolved into a grown activist.’ ...’Ms was formative in my cocooning, it piqued my curiosity, and it became the chrysalis for the woman that I would become and that I am today.’ … How fitting that the night was overshadowed by a grasping phony whose empty platitudes on stage failed to make headlines, whose spokesperson told a wild story of a high-stakes car chase.

Pity Meghan, but recognize her strength. Admire her, but never laugh at her. And never, ever question her veracity.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 389May 20, 2023 2:56 AM

How much did her team have to fork out for this?

by Anonymousreply 390May 20, 2023 2:59 AM

OMG walking out to "this girl is on fire..." so much cheeziness. I am embarrassed for her.

by Anonymousreply 391May 20, 2023 3:37 AM

So you just have to call yourself an Activist and you get awards? What a farce.

by Anonymousreply 392May 20, 2023 3:42 AM

Truly, Meghan should run for President.

by Anonymousreply 393May 20, 2023 4:45 AM

Is D.C. more conducive to the extended high speed car chases they are desperately seeking?

by Anonymousreply 394May 20, 2023 4:49 AM

[quote] “Congratulations,” she said, “and frankly, well deserved.”

The “frankly” rankles. Taking ownership of their awards like she alone recognized these individuals and made it happen and you, the audience, didn’t appreciate them until she pointed it out.

by Anonymousreply 395May 20, 2023 12:27 PM

LOL the “frankly” signifies that she is the ultimate yardstick to measure accomplishments. Puke!!

by Anonymousreply 396May 20, 2023 12:33 PM

If they had just discreetly driven off in their rented Hertz to a Motel 6 and let the paps follow the decoy SUVs, this whole kerfuffle could have been avoided. Instead, they've caused pandemonium and put Glo out. Nobody should be crashing last minute at an elderly woman's home, it's just plain bad manners!

by Anonymousreply 397May 20, 2023 2:00 PM

Everytime i think their 15 minutes of fame is up, one or the other does something outlandish to attract attention, usually infavorable attention. Who is advising them? In all of the pcitures from the event Harry looks peeved and Meghan is smiling her insane grin. WFT?

by Anonymousreply 398May 20, 2023 2:52 PM

Meghan cheating rumors

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 399May 20, 2023 4:24 PM

One of the 'honorees' was an ugly, obese Texas woman who railed against overturning Roe v Wade on Twitter. She got a lot of blowback from people questioning who would be blind enough to make her pregnant. That's her claim to fame. A Twitter troll.

by Anonymousreply 400May 20, 2023 4:31 PM

Congratulations, r400.

In my 20 years here at the DL, you've managed to usurp previous winners for the prize of the most ignorant post ever.

And, in a cesspool sea of Trumpers, bigots, the ill-informed and just plain stupid, that's saying a lot.

by Anonymousreply 401May 20, 2023 4:59 PM

R401 in my 25 years on Twitter, I never encountered a DLer who had any sympathy for a fat, ugly woman desperate for attention.

by Anonymousreply 402May 20, 2023 5:02 PM

LOL one of the comments on Twitter noted that MS Magazine ceased publishing in 1987. How old would Megsie have been in 1987? Assuming she's not lying about her age like she lies about everything else.

by Anonymousreply 403May 20, 2023 5:03 PM

She claims she was born in 1981 so obviously she was ultra precocious.

by Anonymousreply 404May 20, 2023 5:05 PM

Oops... my 25 years on the DL - the good old days where it was one of the few safe havens on the interwebs for people who thought another fat, ugly tart Monica Lewinsky was a tool of Newt Gingrich.

-- 402

by Anonymousreply 405May 20, 2023 5:08 PM

Not true R403. Ms changed owners in 1987 (and a couple times after that) but it never stopped publishing.

Not that it makes Meghan's story true. If anything this is likely another "chicken tacos lunch" kind of tale from her.

by Anonymousreply 406May 20, 2023 5:14 PM

"Ms." didn't cease publication in 1987, it just switched from publishing 12 issues annually to 4.

by Anonymousreply 407May 20, 2023 5:18 PM

I just can't believe that Harry would participate in such a ghoulish ploy for attention. I mean...he OBVIOUSLY did but this has Meghan and her PR stink all over it. But AGAIN, he let it happen. Could he have possibly been unaware they were going to take this direction?

by Anonymousreply 408May 20, 2023 6:26 PM

Harry & Meghan have been in lock step since they met. Stop infantilizing him. He's just as responsible for his life choices, even if he is ceding some decisions to her.

by Anonymousreply 409May 20, 2023 6:50 PM

I think it's more likely the other way around, r408. This reaction to the paps is Harry's doing and Meghan's probably aghast at how it's turned out. She wants the paparazzi attention, while he wants the paparazzi attention for her and media adulation for himself, while imagining he can control the media.

by Anonymousreply 410May 20, 2023 6:57 PM

Oh bullshit. Sparkles doesn't know embarrassment or shame. Agree R409. They played their parts -- Harry the red faced12 year old coffin follower, and Saint Sparkles rachet smiling through all of it.

by Anonymousreply 411May 20, 2023 7:02 PM

Whenever something sours, she will blame him if she can. Remember, she had a great life and deigned to marry him, giving up everything in the process. Try to imagine a guy being stupid enough to believe that, but Harry did. Now we know that he has not one but two hotels where he hangs out at to get high and get away from the nagging.

I thought it was interesting to see which media picked up the story uncritically and the difficulties they had adjusting and righting the ship, so to speak, when it became clear they had been fed a line of BS. TMZ broke the story and tried to stand by it as long as they could but finally gave up by Saturday. .

The NYT embarrassed itself by working up to a paparazzi expose that faulted one of the photogs for not wanting to speak to them without compensation. The horror. I'm sure the editors are wagging fingers at them from their summer rentals along the shoreline.

David Muir made an ass of himself.

The NY Post, filthy rag that it is, did a creditable job but screwed up by having Douglas Murray, one of Murdoch's Oxford toffs, pretend to be a street-smart New Yorker with a column titled "Sorry Harry and Meghan, the lies don't fly in NYC." But, of course, they do and the Post is the greatest prevaricator.

by Anonymousreply 412May 20, 2023 7:43 PM

R408 I assume Meghan keeps Harry in the dark about most of her machinations. Not hard to do given he's stupid and mentally ill. Harry's basically Britney Spears without any noticeable talent.

So the only dick Meghan can get is the bodyguard? How unoriginal.

by Anonymousreply 413May 20, 2023 7:50 PM

I thought that too, R411, so I was surprised she didn't sashet into the coronation to try to get as much attention as possible, positive or negative. Wouldn't it have helped her brand?

So I'm torn. Either she didn't want to face the scorn - or she had some other reason for not attending. (or did the 'negotiations' end up involving her not coming at all -- there were rumors she was having an ivory gown designed beforehand, for what it's worth)

by Anonymousreply 414May 20, 2023 9:28 PM

* oops - I meant "sashay"

by Anonymousreply 415May 20, 2023 9:29 PM

Markle's a spineless weasel and can't face the Windsors on their terms, is my guess. She's between a rock and a hard place in that she is next to nothing without him (I wonder if she knows that).

by Anonymousreply 416May 20, 2023 9:44 PM

I think she could have endured being iced out by Harry's family, as it would only enhance her brand of victimhood. But no way could she take seeing Kate in all her glory up close and personal.

by Anonymousreply 417May 20, 2023 10:56 PM

[quote]Markle's a spineless weasel and can't face the Windsors on their terms, is my guess. She's between a rock and a hard place in that she is next to nothing without him (I wonder if she knows that).

They are horrible lying grifters, but they have made their money and can live very comfortably. And if they divorce, she will still be a 'next-to-nothing, but a quite wealthy one at that considering that California is a community property state along with the money she will scheme from the royal family. And Charles just may give in to get rid of Markle.

by Anonymousreply 418May 21, 2023 12:06 AM

[quote] they have made their money and can live very comfortably

Which begs the question, why didn't they just pay for the fucking hotel on their own?

by Anonymousreply 419May 21, 2023 3:51 AM

Because, they think that they are far more important (and popular) than they actually are. Once the Carlyle humiliated them they couldn't pay full price. Now why they didn't pick another hotel is a mystery.

by Anonymousreply 420May 21, 2023 4:36 AM

It may not be an Airbnb but I imagine it was somewhere that they wanted to keep quiet - either not grand enough or lent to them by someone dodgy.

Or, come to think of it, by someone who specified that they didn’t want to be identified as having a connection to them.

by Anonymousreply 421May 21, 2023 4:42 AM

Maybe I am naive but I don't think Markle would waste herself on a security guard. If she fucks around it would be with somebody richer and more powerful.

by Anonymousreply 422May 21, 2023 5:54 AM

Waste herself? You really think this aging yacht girl, D-list actress would have old billionaires lusting for her ugly lying ass? She’s lucky to get a bodyguard.

by Anonymousreply 423May 21, 2023 6:09 AM

People tend to cheat with whoever is nearby. Like Arnold fucking actresses on set and that ugly maid. If Meghan is cheating it would make sense for it to be someone who is around her constantly.

On a side note the bodyguard isnt even that hot. His eyes seem too close together but maybe she likes that now after being with Harry.

by Anonymousreply 424May 21, 2023 1:16 PM

Is that the story, Meghan demanded the presidential suite as a freebie but the hotel turned her down?. She couldn’t stay in a regular (really nice) room? Or try a different hotel more amenable to freebies? Whereas Harry apparently has two hotels in California holding rooms for him to chill out so paying for hotel rooms isn’t an issue. This story really doesn’t add up.

by Anonymousreply 425May 21, 2023 1:16 PM

I saw this article a week ago. Perhaps they were leaking stories like this to try to get a fancy hotel to give them a rate in exchange for publicity but couldnt do it?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 426May 21, 2023 1:22 PM

If Harry stayed at the Aman, someone else was paying for it, probably the publisher to get him to finish his goddam book. Maybe this story was leaker to show the Carlyle what great publicity they could expect if they comped her a suite.

by Anonymousreply 427May 21, 2023 1:35 PM

Carlyle staffer: Sir, some royals called and they would like a discounted room for next week.

Manager: oh how lovely! Is it William and Catherine again?? Princess Anne??

Staffer: um no, its Prince Harry and Meghan.

Manager: cant do it and tell them we are all booked.

by Anonymousreply 428May 21, 2023 1:44 PM

I'm wondering if the Women of Vision thing offered them a hotel room, as is usual in these cases, but they rejected it as not being suitable for them as very important personages.

by Anonymousreply 429May 21, 2023 2:04 PM

Probably. Otherwise why not just stay at a normal hotel? You just need a place to dump your bags and sleep.

by Anonymousreply 430May 22, 2023 2:10 PM

They probably demanded an entire floor for themselves and their entourage.

by Anonymousreply 431May 22, 2023 2:13 PM

So Megsie walks out on stage in a gold dress, with gold accessories...and the song playing *just happens* to be wailing "This Girl Is On Fire"?

How cringe. That she and the organisers probably planned this, makes it one of the saddest things ever.

Would love to know if any A-listers take notes from her actions on how NOT to behave in public. Wish one of them would have a source snark to the press that she and Dimbo are truly reviled in LaLa Land.

by Anonymousreply 432May 23, 2023 11:55 PM

Do I dare ask what happened tonight when she received another "award"?

by Anonymousreply 433May 24, 2023 3:19 AM

Social climber slowly losing relevancy. Must be eating her alive and making sis Samantha want to jump out of the wheelchair.

by Anonymousreply 434May 24, 2023 3:24 AM

Do you know how many Gracie Awards are given out? I just found out. There are at least 9 categories with many, many winners in each. Meghan's category is Digital Media National, which has 22 winners.

The longer the temporal distance from her time with the Royal Family, the more laughable it becomes to see her referred to by the title Megan, Duchess of Sussex, which is how she's listed below. It just seems insane. It may be her title, but how it is her identity at all? She got the title on her wedding day and skedaddled out of the country a year later.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 435May 24, 2023 3:31 AM

Sorry for misspelling your name, milady. ^

by Anonymousreply 436May 24, 2023 3:32 AM

You get a trophy and you get a trophy and you get a trophy!

by Anonymousreply 437May 24, 2023 3:34 AM

The irony is that she can’t even get her title right. “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” is either the ex-wife or widow of the Duke of Sussex. She’s The Duchess of Sussex, although she obviously wanted to work her name in somehow.

by Anonymousreply 438May 24, 2023 5:22 AM

[quote] Meghan Markle married well. That is all.

I think you have her mixed up with Kate Middleton. She was a celebrity in her own right before marrying Harry, and, unlike supporting causes because “service” is an obligation to the British people, she supports them because she believes in them.

There, that’s sorted!

by Anonymousreply 439May 24, 2023 5:29 AM

Which causes does Meghan believe in, r439?

by Anonymousreply 440May 24, 2023 6:06 AM

Yes, R439 - she was famous on a global scale. Absolutely, positively famous on that obscure Canadian cable show that nobody watched. Incredibly famous.

by Anonymousreply 441May 24, 2023 6:14 AM

She is a "Woman of Vision" indeed, she certainly is good at keeping her eye on the prize.

by Anonymousreply 442May 24, 2023 6:27 AM

R439, why does Meghan insist on being called "Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex" at all these award ceremonies where she's honoured for her service?

by Anonymousreply 443May 24, 2023 6:37 AM

Witch of Endor title is still open, or how about Meghan, Maid of Malarkey of Montecito?

by Anonymousreply 444May 24, 2023 10:15 AM

Duchess Doritos.

by Anonymousreply 445May 24, 2023 12:20 PM

[quote] Duchess Doritos.

Sophie Wessex the Motorcade Murderer.

by Anonymousreply 446May 24, 2023 4:44 PM

r446 You sound extremely stupid, crass, immature even emotionally stunted. No emotionally and psychologically well person would post what you just have.

by Anonymousreply 447May 24, 2023 4:49 PM

Gosh, since she was such a well-known celebrity as Meghan Markle, why didn't she follow the longstanding actress tradition of retaining the name under which she became an established star in the Hollywood firmament? It's as if her own name weren't fancy enough for her anymore!

Imagine hitching your whole identity to a fluff title like that when you had worldwide fame under your real name.

by Anonymousreply 448May 24, 2023 5:56 PM

I should have signed that as follows:

by Anonymousreply 449May 24, 2023 5:59 PM

R439 if Meghan was such a hot commodity during he Suits days how come she got no movie roles in between seasons? The women on Desperate Housewives, Friends, Sex & The City etc etc all made movies in the summer break. She was attractive back then so could have at least got some romcom or romantic drama. Could it be that she wasn't particular well known or well regarded?

by Anonymousreply 450May 24, 2023 8:29 PM

So, Meghan just didn't turn up at the Gracie Awards, even though she was an awardee? Too ashamed to show her face in public?

by Anonymousreply 451May 24, 2023 9:20 PM

Who's Sophie Wessex, r446?

by Anonymousreply 452May 24, 2023 9:21 PM

R451 I was convinced she was shameless. Maybe not. Or there's another reason -did someone say upthread it's because there are too many other honorees that outshine her?

by Anonymousreply 453May 24, 2023 9:25 PM

Markle will never appear with beautiful women in a convivial atmosphere where the attention is not centered on her -- her mental illness would take off like a rocket

by Anonymousreply 454May 24, 2023 10:10 PM

It's now Sophie Edinburgh, r452.

by Anonymousreply 455May 24, 2023 10:53 PM

[quote]I think you have her mixed up with Kate Middleton. She was a celebrity in her own right before marrying Harry, and, unlike supporting causes because “service” is an obligation to the British people, she supports them because she believes in them. There, that’s sorted!

R439. Markle was not a celebrity. She was an actress on a little known cable show, which does not qualify one as a celebrity. Also, she was/is not involved in "service." She instead offers minimal lip service and word salad to pretend to offer service.

There, that’s sorted!

by Anonymousreply 456May 24, 2023 10:53 PM

Seethe, Grannies!


by Anonymousreply 457May 25, 2023 1:28 AM

Actually r457 she is unhappy person so I don't consider that a success. With the odds against her (American, biracial, divorced) she actually landed a Prince. She lives in a beautiful home in a beautiful area and has two (I am assuming) healthy children. But she will never be happy, always trying to grasp more fame and more accolades.

by Anonymousreply 458May 25, 2023 3:00 AM

Also she and Harry are very jealous people. Even if they are successful they are envious of what others have so they are never satisfied.

by Anonymousreply 459May 25, 2023 3:07 AM

Yeah she's never going to be the type to just kick back by the pool with the kids running around and say "You know Harry, we have it pretty good, others have it much worse.."

by Anonymousreply 460May 25, 2023 6:33 AM

I always have trouble understanding this, but I have read in many places, assuming Meghan is a narcissist (and I do):

The narcissist will never be happy.

“Contrary to the common misperception, narcissists aren’t arrogant even if they act arrogant,” explains Pavel G. Somov, Ph.D. “They simply don’t feel good about themselves.”

Despite incalculable self-importance, the narcissist doesn’t have high self-esteem. They coat themselves in praise and approval from others to hide their biggest fear.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 461May 25, 2023 7:34 AM

I don't claim to know, or want to know, what personal feelings and reactions are going on with the Sussexes, or, within their marriage.

I'll reserve my observations on that until the inevitable divorce happens and the couple publicly go to Defcon 1 with each other.

Still, WME has its hands full with Markle.

Now what? They have to endure and wait-out the hilarious, ill-advised, ill-worded statement form the Sussexes on the non-existent two hours chase in Manhattan.

When Mayor Eric Adams has to stifle laughing on "Morning Joe", that's a PR problem, to state the obvious.

If nothing else, I've got to give the Sussexes credit for keeping my attention, even if it's to stick around to see how they extricate themselves from all of this.

if Markle had the balls, talent and guts, she'd take a TV role similar to Alexis Carrington or Vanessa Williams on "Ugly Betty".

Her not brazening it out and attending the Coronation tells me, however, that she has none of those attributes.

by Anonymousreply 462May 25, 2023 11:59 AM

Have you seen Markle "act?" She couldn't handle a role like Wilhelmina.

by Anonymousreply 463May 25, 2023 12:09 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!