Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Do we really need 100 threads about the Exorcist????

It’s pathetic how every time it’s on TV we get all these threads about such a dumb movie.

by Anonymousreply 47August 2, 2023 7:40 PM

Yep. We do. We need hundreds of threads about The Exorcist.

by Anonymousreply 1April 27, 2023 2:44 PM

OP talking to a spider:

[Quote] Do we really need 100 threads

by Anonymousreply 2April 27, 2023 2:49 PM

It’s not a dumb movie.

by Anonymousreply 3April 27, 2023 3:29 PM

Well, TCM showed the theatrical version (with one exception: they substituted the 2000 WB logo for the original Saul Bass logo), and that's kind of rare now.

by Anonymousreply 4April 27, 2023 4:20 PM

Yes, we do we have to placate Azuz or whatever that Demons name is. Do you want to take that chance, OP.

by Anonymousreply 5April 27, 2023 5:14 PM

Watch your step, OP.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6April 27, 2023 5:19 PM

The 1974 version gave Warner Bros a lotta money in net profit. I helped count the money back in those days.

by Anonymousreply 7April 27, 2023 5:20 PM

Thanks for starting this thread OP, it was sorely needed.

Here's an update from CinemaCon, the trailer dropped yesterday and apparently scared the shit out of the audience.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8April 27, 2023 6:44 PM

Better Exorcist then Meghan Markle and that inbred German family, OP. That horse has been beat to death.

by Anonymousreply 9April 27, 2023 7:07 PM

[quote] Well, TCM showed the theatrical version (with one exception: they substituted the 2000 WB logo for the original Saul Bass logo)

If it’s the original theatrical version, why wouldn’t it have the original logo?

by Anonymousreply 10April 27, 2023 7:23 PM

1973, r7.

by Anonymousreply 11April 27, 2023 7:23 PM

Generally, when I see a topic in which I have zero interest, I ignore it and go on to something else. I "pass by on the other side," just like the man in the biblical tale of the Good Samaritan.

Incidentally, I believe that Exorcist 3 has the first installment beat by a country mile.

by Anonymousreply 12April 27, 2023 9:15 PM

r12 I keep trying to watch it but it starts off so slow. I keep hearing how it's actually good.

by Anonymousreply 13April 27, 2023 9:18 PM

R11. You're right. It was released the last week of 1973.

by Anonymousreply 14April 27, 2023 9:23 PM

Do people really think that starting a thread like this won't result in additional threads on the topic they're crying about?

by Anonymousreply 15April 27, 2023 9:26 PM

I've seen one thread, but since you created a new one, now I've seen two, dumbass.

"I hate threads about ___ so I will create a new thread about ___"

by Anonymousreply 16April 27, 2023 9:27 PM

R13, there is one scene in E3 that will make your heart leap into your mouth the first time you view it. Even after seeing E3 numerous times that scene never fails to make me jump. (For those who have seen the movie, it's the scene in the hospital corridor where a nurse enters a room at the right of the screen.

by Anonymousreply 17April 27, 2023 9:30 PM

R12 Miss Lucy, strange but true fact: Jeffrey Dahmer always watched Exorcist 3 with his victims prior to drilling holes in their heads. I've watched the movie many times but can't grasp at what point Dahmer went off. There is no one scene that makes me think, "This is it", this is the scene that set him off. Super creepy.

by Anonymousreply 18April 27, 2023 9:32 PM

Thanks for the information, R18. That really is creepy.

by Anonymousreply 19April 27, 2023 9:44 PM

[quote]R10: If it’s the original theatrical version, why wouldn’t it have the original logo?

Because they swapped it out. When re-releasing films, studios often do that. I'm a bit OCD about things like that, so I noticed. Seeing the logo from 'The Version You've Never Seen' (2000), I nearly reflexively deleted it off the DVR, but I watched a bit to see which version it would be. Apart from the logo, it was the 1973 theatrical version.

Here's that wrong logo:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20April 27, 2023 10:28 PM

I'll GLADLY discuss the antics of Pazuzu (at length) before even clicking on another BRF thread.

by Anonymousreply 21April 27, 2023 10:35 PM

Why, thank you r21, Native West Virginian. Let's discuss in person soon. Or rather, in your person.

by Anonymousreply 22April 27, 2023 11:38 PM

Now I'm scared shitless and can't sleep.

by Anonymousreply 23April 28, 2023 2:30 AM

I watched The Exorcist tonight (recorded from TCM) for the first time in decades. What struck me this time is that Bonnie Franklin appears to have modeled her look and her performance as Ann Romano on Ellen Burstyn in this film.

by Anonymousreply 24April 28, 2023 3:25 AM

R13, it’s supposed to start off slow to build the tension. There’s also no music in the film except a brief scene with Tubular Bells playing. That’s what makes it all the more disturbing. William Friedkin’s bs ground was in documentary’s and that’s how it was produced.

by Anonymousreply 25April 28, 2023 3:36 AM

I love that you can see the butler, Karl passed out on the floor during the crucifix scene as the chest of drawers moves. That was in the book. They didn’t make it a big thing in the film. It’s a total Easter egg. Karl was accused of putting the crucifix in her bedroom in an earlier scene.

by Anonymousreply 26April 28, 2023 3:38 AM

Thanks, r20.

by Anonymousreply 27April 28, 2023 3:39 AM

It’s really disturbing to see that real life gay serial killer holding Linda’s head still in the hospital scene and rubbing her back as she’s drinking a milk shake in another. Friedkin would go on to base his film “Cruising” on the guy.

by Anonymousreply 28April 28, 2023 3:40 AM

[quote]Bonnie Franklin appears to have modeled her look and her performance as Ann Romano on Ellen Burstyn in this film.

I feel Bonnie modeled her look and performance on Pazuzu...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29April 28, 2023 4:25 AM

As a kid I was absolutely terrified at the scene when Barbara walked in on Ann plunging a screwdriver into her cunt while screaming, "Let Schneider fuck you! Let Schneider fuck you!"

by Anonymousreply 30April 28, 2023 3:26 PM

[Quote] I love that you can see the butler, Karl passed out on the floor during the crucifix scene as the chest of drawers moves.

Do you mean in the book, r26? I don't recall seeing what you describe in the movie.

The crucifix itself was said to be part of a continuity error in the film, as Chris took it away from Regan and brought it downstairs right as Lt. Kinderman came calling. Therefore, how it got back to up to Regan's bedroom is intended to remain a mystery, or is actually an error on the part of the filmmakers.

by Anonymousreply 31April 30, 2023 11:29 PM

This clearly calls for an exorcism!

by Anonymousreply 32April 30, 2023 11:51 PM

[quote] As a kid I was absolutely terrified at the scene when Barbara walked in on Ann plunging a screwdriver into her cunt while screaming, "Let Schneider fuck you! Let Schneider fuck you!"

I shouldn’t have laughed at this, but I did.

by Anonymousreply 33May 1, 2023 12:00 AM

[quote]R31: The crucifix itself was said to be part of a continuity error in the film, as Chris took it away from Regan and brought it downstairs right as Lt. Kinderman came calling. Therefore, how it got back to up to Regan's bedroom is intended to remain a mystery, or is actually an error on the part of the filmmakers.

Hmm. I'd always assumed that the demon put it in her room to begin with (in order to helpfully suggest a religious solution to the otherwise non-religious household), and perhaps transported it back from where Chris had moved it.

Who performed the desecration in Dahlgren Chapel? Are we supposed to think that Regan schlepped in her sleep over there with a big bucket of her modeling clay (that stuff wasn't cheap) and put inflamed tits and a dick on the Virgin Mary?

Perhaps the book clarifies all this stuff, but I read it a lifetime ago back in the late 70s/early 80s, and really don't recall.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34May 2, 2023 9:53 PM

Film Is William Friedkin's horror classic 'The Exorcist' actually cursed? Can a film be haunted? The strange events surrounding The Exorcist have convinced many film fans that the answer may be yes. Released in 1973, the William Friedkin horror classic tells the story of an innocent young girl possessed by a demonic spirit. On release, it sent a shiver down the world’s spine and quickly became the subject of critical debate. For some, it was regarded as evangelical claptrap, while certain Christian groups regarded it as a repellant example of anti-Christian pornography.

link:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35May 2, 2023 10:16 PM

Has anyone seen the FX series? Is it worth watching?

by Anonymousreply 36May 2, 2023 10:35 PM

Do we really need you as the goddamned hall monitor OP?

by Anonymousreply 37May 2, 2023 10:44 PM

R34 in the book it's all but stated that Regan is responsible for the desecration in the church. Not so much in the movie.

R36 the TV series entitled The Exorcist was surprisingly good.

by Anonymousreply 38May 3, 2023 8:03 PM

[quote]Do we really need 100 threads about “The Exorcist”???

We need 666 threads.

by Anonymousreply 39May 3, 2023 8:15 PM

I’m bored so I’m watching it this morning as it’s in the “Last Chance” cue on MAX. I thought it had been a long time since I’d seen it, but I guess not as I’m remembering almost all of it.

This came out when I was a little kid and I was terrified to even hear anyone talk about it. Finally saw it in college..and..it certainly has creepy/good moments but I wasn’t terribly frightened by it. The scenes with the statue and the fighting dogs at the beginning, and the priest’s dream about his mother are scarier than a lot of the Pazuzu/special effects scenes.

I did think the tv series was good. Wish it had been on a streamer instead of Fox; it might have gotten more than 2 seasons.

by Anonymousreply 40June 3, 2023 1:03 PM

Yes. And everytime I have to mention that there is a statute of Jason Miller in downtown Scranton and he is buried there a few plots over from Hillary's father.

by Anonymousreply 41June 3, 2023 1:30 PM

[quote]R25: There’s also no music in the film except a brief scene with Tubular Bells playing.

There's 𝑙𝑜𝑡𝑠 of music in the film. To wit:

𝐊𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐎𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐚𝐩𝐞, by Krzysztof Penderecki

𝐂𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐨, by Krzysztof Penderecki

𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐭 (𝟏𝟗𝟔𝟎), by Krzysztof Penderecki

𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐲𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐚, by Krzysztof Penderecki (also used in 'The Shining')

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐋𝐨𝐮𝐝𝐨𝐧, by Krzysztof Penderecki

𝐅𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐚 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬, by Hans Werner Henze

(𝐓𝐮𝐭𝐭𝐢) 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐈: 𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬, by George Crumb

𝐅𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐝, 𝐀̈𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐙𝐚𝐫𝐭 (𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐅𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐏𝐢𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐎𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚, 𝐎𝐩. 𝟏𝟎), by Anton Webern

𝐁𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 (𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐩), by Harry Bee

𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲, 𝐍𝐨𝐬. 𝟏 & 𝟐, by David Borden

𝐑𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐧' 𝐌𝐚𝐧, performed by The Allman Brothers Band

𝐈𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐮, performed by Rita Sakellariou

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐤𝐢 𝐦𝐨𝐮, performed by Giannis Kalatzis

𝐃𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝟑𝟑𝐫𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟑𝐫𝐝, performed by The Party Goers

𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞, by Eumir Deodato

𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐕𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐠𝐞, by Les Baxter

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42June 4, 2023 12:22 AM

[quote]R41: And everytime I have to mention that there is a statute of Jason Miller in downtown Scranton...

Wow! And it was sculpted by the late actor Paul Sorvino!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43June 5, 2023 3:30 PM

We haven't had a good Exorcist thread in quite some time.

by Anonymousreply 44June 15, 2023 4:33 PM

It's "leaving soon" on Max (or HBO or whatever- the HBO streaming thing on the TV.(

by Anonymousreply 45June 15, 2023 4:33 PM

Breaking - The Exorcist 4K UHD release is September 19, 2023 and they've dropped a fresh new trailer to accompany the release (embedded at link).Honestly it's the best trailer for this movie I've seen. And that's saying a lot.

It will be released in BOTH the 1973 theatrical and 2000 director's cut.

I think the timing is a cuntbone kick to the Believer release in October.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 46August 2, 2023 7:32 PM

OP’s mother SUCKS COCKS IN HELL!!

by Anonymousreply 47August 2, 2023 7:40 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!