Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

GOOP in court

She looks like shit. Not aging well

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 280April 7, 2023 6:50 AM

Looks about right for 50 yrs old

by Anonymousreply 1March 22, 2023 2:50 AM

Her pussy looks STEAMED.

by Anonymousreply 2March 22, 2023 2:52 AM

She looks like mother, more than ever

by Anonymousreply 3March 22, 2023 2:52 AM

Goopy looks fine, given she’s so skinny. She’s letting some greys in among the blonde.

by Anonymousreply 4March 22, 2023 3:05 AM

She looks like a Barbie that was left by the fireplace too long.

by Anonymousreply 5March 22, 2023 3:06 AM

r5, great description!

by Anonymousreply 6March 22, 2023 3:08 AM

I think she looks fine, too. Not as pale as usual.

by Anonymousreply 7March 22, 2023 3:10 AM

Courtroom lighting, the great equalizer.

by Anonymousreply 8March 22, 2023 3:10 AM

The no-makeup look has never worked for her, despite the fact that she thinks it has, and it especially doesn't work now.

by Anonymousreply 9March 22, 2023 3:10 AM

My god, why she looks like an indignant 80-year-old Joan Didion!

by Anonymousreply 10March 22, 2023 3:12 AM

“Don’t you know who I am?!”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11March 22, 2023 3:16 AM

Give me a normally aging Gwyneth over a pulled, plastic Real Housewife any day. I think she looks fine.

by Anonymousreply 12March 22, 2023 3:17 AM

[quote] The no-makeup look has never worked for her, despite the fact that she thinks it has, and it especially doesn't work now.

She must think she's so beautiful she doesn't need makeup. Technically, no one "needs" makeup, but she always has looked washed-out.

by Anonymousreply 13March 22, 2023 3:17 AM

This is Paltrow in October of 2022 in conventional makeup when she was to appear as a guest on the Jimmy Kimmel show.

I'm assuming that the no makeup and glasses in the courtroom is a look she planned with her lawyers. She's being sued for $300,000, and she needs the jury to know that she's not some fancy-pants, highfalutin Hollywood star. Underneath it all, she's just ordinary relatable people, like you and me. (Only not.)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14March 22, 2023 3:52 AM

R14, that's not really her normal look, esp. not that red lipstick.

by Anonymousreply 15March 22, 2023 4:01 AM

[quote]She must think she's so beautiful she doesn't need makeup. Technically, no one "needs" makeup, but she always has looked washed-out.

She basically quit acting and has devoted the last 10 years of her life to her appearance. She spends most of her time on beauty treatments, diets, devices, and all kinds of things devoted to her appearance.

And she looks like something the cat vomited up

by Anonymousreply 16March 22, 2023 4:03 AM

It would be hilarious if Weinstein testified against her. He knows a few things about her "honesty".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17March 22, 2023 4:06 AM

Because Harvey is so honest and upstanding?

by Anonymousreply 18March 22, 2023 4:11 AM

R18 = That was sarcasm. She is a Nepo Princess. She "auditioned" for her roles. You cannot point at TWO dishonest people and ignore the blonde one currently on trial.

by Anonymousreply 19March 22, 2023 4:14 AM

Weinstein always has that avuncular look, but then you spot where his hands are and it’s always on the actress’s ribcage, right below the breasts.

by Anonymousreply 20March 22, 2023 4:31 AM

Now I remember who she reminds me of lately

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21March 22, 2023 4:38 AM

I think her legal strategy is to look like a homeless crackhead so the jury will think she’s broke. I was shocked when I saw how horribly she’s aged.

by Anonymousreply 22March 22, 2023 4:48 AM

She looks like an aging elf from some Tolkien rip off.

by Anonymousreply 23March 22, 2023 4:52 AM

She looks like an average suburban frau you’d see at any mall in the Midwest

by Anonymousreply 24March 22, 2023 4:57 AM

I've never put Weinstein and "avuncular" together in my mind before now

by Anonymousreply 25March 22, 2023 4:59 AM

She's lost her lips! What happened to her lips?

by Anonymousreply 26March 22, 2023 5:24 AM

r26 They're now part of her cheeks! They're happier there.

by Anonymousreply 27March 22, 2023 5:28 AM

R2, does it look like this now?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28March 22, 2023 5:30 AM

R 21,😆😂!

by Anonymousreply 29March 22, 2023 5:50 AM

It would be cute if this had a rom com ending with Gwyneth and Terry hooking up after the trial and then spending their honeymoon back on the Park City slopes.

"Double Diamond!"

by Anonymousreply 30March 22, 2023 5:55 AM

Are they allowing her to have her IV drip vitamin flush while she’s in court?

by Anonymousreply 31March 22, 2023 5:58 AM

R31, no, but she's allowed some vaginal steaming time with the prison air fryer.

by Anonymousreply 32March 22, 2023 6:00 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33March 22, 2023 6:00 AM

^^Going for the Gloria Steinem look that's all the rage these days.

by Anonymousreply 34March 22, 2023 6:04 AM

She was never a great beauty, she just had youth, hot boyfriends, and connections on her side. So she looks as good as could be expected. I'm glad she hasn't gone for the puffed up boxer look.

by Anonymousreply 35March 22, 2023 6:13 AM

Love her outfit at the NY Post link.

Those Doc Martens are fab.

by Anonymousreply 36March 22, 2023 6:21 AM

Why wouldn't she just give him the 300k?

by Anonymousreply 37March 22, 2023 6:35 AM

I hope she’s doing a GRWM TikTok each day about what she’s wearing to court.

by Anonymousreply 38March 22, 2023 6:41 AM

Yeah, it does seem like her attorneys’ fees would be at least $100,000 to fight this case, excluding an actual trial. She should settle. $300K sounds relatively modest. Maybe she feels like: Nobody shakes down Gwyneth.

by Anonymousreply 39March 22, 2023 6:49 AM

she put on sunscreens like lighlights, at 5.11. The sun causes upto 90% of the visible signs of the againg

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40March 22, 2023 7:02 AM

Will Sonny Bono and Natasha Richardson be brought up during this case?

by Anonymousreply 41March 22, 2023 7:04 AM

I like her. She could easily pay, but doesn't feel she was in the wrong. Who cares about her makeup?

by Anonymousreply 42March 22, 2023 7:08 AM

By 50, you can either look old or look like an old freak who has had plastic surgery. The exceptions are rare and few.

by Anonymousreply 43March 22, 2023 7:09 AM

R37 Don't be a dolt. It's not about the money. Gwyneth has plenty of it. It's about the principle. The guy isn't dead and seems to be well enough to battle her in court. He is obviously trying to fleece her because of who she is and Gwyneth knows it. We all do. If she caved and gave him the $300k with no fuss: a) he might still try and go for more and b) it might encourage others to do the same. Duh. All of a sudden Gwyneth finds herself in the Heartbreakers (2001) sequel no one asked for.

Rule #1 of being a public figure: never let people know how much money you have. Rule #2: Never admit fault or wrongdoing if there's plausible deniability. The fastest way to lose your fortune is to give it way to everyone who asks you for money or to settle with everyone who sues you. Hire sharks and bury those peasants beneath the courthouse. Second fastest way to lose your money is to be overly litigious and let the blood sucking lawyers deplete your fortune with their expensive services.

Even MJ had to go to court the second time. Couldn't afford to be taken for another $20M+. Alas, his lavish lifestyle, limited solo output, expensive settlements, and drawn out legal battles depleted his fortune into death. The estate remains awash in cash, but only after his demise. Same with Elvis and Marilyn in that regard.

Gwyneth looks fine. She looks like a rich woman who had money her whole life, because she has. No need for garish, ostentatious fashion. Everyone knows the trashy nouveau riche fuck with their face using obvious plastic surgery and heavy fillers. She'll win and live to push more Goop on us.

by Anonymousreply 44March 22, 2023 7:32 AM

The building blocks of collagen are PROTEIN and FAT. Not really GOOP diet friendly- hence the face. I also think despite all the health talk, that she's been quietly living a pretty sybaritic existence for a while now. She likes booze *quite a bit*, is not averse to some sun worshipping, and as of a few years ago had a policy whereby she was allowed one cigarette a week, as a treat.

by Anonymousreply 45March 22, 2023 7:45 AM

She’d look fine for a normal woman her age, but she looks awful for a woman that pumps millions into her appearance and nutrition.

by Anonymousreply 46March 22, 2023 7:57 AM

Nobody can smoke one cigarette a week.

by Anonymousreply 47March 22, 2023 8:09 AM

I saw something on TV that said she was being sued for $3 million and counter-suing for $1.

by Anonymousreply 48March 22, 2023 8:11 AM

The face lift she had around 2013 or so looks good but she should stop messing with her eyes, as she is is starting to get that Jocelyn Wildebstein upward tilt.

She never had lips, same as her mother. She’s always been plain. I think it’s the lack of top lip that makes both of them look so insufferably smug.

I’m really shocked she let this go to court. $300k is nothing to her. Why not settle out of court? Maybe she just craves attention so much that any media coverage is “good” coverage?

by Anonymousreply 49March 22, 2023 8:56 AM

Also, I think the turtleneck is to hide the layers of thick chains you usually see her wearing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50March 22, 2023 9:01 AM

Court lighting is flattering to NO ONE. And if you’re getting sued you’re not really supposed to “look good” anyway.

by Anonymousreply 51March 22, 2023 9:25 AM

Speak for yourself, R51.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52March 22, 2023 9:32 AM

Quote[She basically quit acting and has devoted the last 10 years of her life to her appearance. She spends most of her time on beauty treatments, diets, devices, and all kinds of things devoted to her appearance.]

Which is why it strikes me as oddly arrogant that she doesn’t get a little bit of lip filler. She seems to spend 99% of her time on some aspect of herself, but she’s too good for a little restalyne? That’s tacky?

by Anonymousreply 53March 22, 2023 10:16 AM

The first time I saw Gwyneth Paltrow was as Wendy in Hook, where she looked like a wan, pale Victorian ghost child.

I recently watched WeCrashed, starring AnnE Hathaway as Gwynnie’s jealous cousin. Man. Talk about an upgrade! She looks about as much like Anne Hathaway as Paul Giamatti looks like Brad Pitt.

GOOP looks like Helen Of Troy compared to her cousin.

by Anonymousreply 54March 22, 2023 10:19 AM

A DJ in my area described her as having the body of a 13 waif; he couldn’t understand why anyone, other than pedos would find her hot. Once I saw it, I couldn’t unsee it; now she’s a middle aged woman with the body of a 15 year old. Pass.

by Anonymousreply 55March 22, 2023 1:52 PM

Did that chest binding in Shakespeare in Love ruin her for life?

by Anonymousreply 56March 22, 2023 1:57 PM

all that ozone she shoved up her poopoo

by Anonymousreply 57March 22, 2023 2:04 PM

He was suing for millions, but the judge threw that out and only let him sue for the $300,000. If she wins, he pays her attorney fees. Maybe she sees him as a grifter, and she's not going to reward that or admit any wrong on her part.

by Anonymousreply 58March 22, 2023 3:30 PM

No, why would she EVER admit to any wrong doing? It’s this guy’s fault for being in her way.

by Anonymousreply 59March 22, 2023 4:13 PM

R46: you nailed it. She looks fine for an average older woman. But she’s not an average older woman. She’s someone who’s made her fortune in health, beauty, and nutrition.

by Anonymousreply 60March 22, 2023 4:18 PM

She's always been plain looking, she just had good hair and was very thin, which in the U.S. frequently passes for beauty. I think she looks fine, but I never found her beautiful to begin with.

by Anonymousreply 61March 22, 2023 4:24 PM

R60 Ummmm…

by Anonymousreply 62March 22, 2023 4:27 PM

Ooh, Blythe got herself a little of restylane! She looks positively glowing and not a day over 65!

by Anonymousreply 63March 22, 2023 4:27 PM

That’s considered good hair? When I think of “good hair”I think of Elaine Irwin or someone like that.

by Anonymousreply 64March 22, 2023 4:29 PM

I maybe in a minority but I think she looks good. It's refreshing to see a 50 year old woman in Hollywood who doesn't look pulled, botoxed, plumped. And I always thought she's pretentious. But maybe that motivated her to go against the norm in Hollywood to look young. It's beneath her.

by Anonymousreply 65March 22, 2023 4:37 PM

I foresee an Amanda Bynes like mental breakdown in her future...this woman is not well.

by Anonymousreply 66March 22, 2023 4:38 PM

She’s only 50. Madonna looked like Madonna at 50. Give her time.

by Anonymousreply 67March 22, 2023 4:39 PM

It MUST have been his fault. Her insurance company would have settled otherwise, but she’s standing on principle on behalf of the rich and famous everywhere.

God bless you, GOOP.

by Anonymousreply 68March 22, 2023 4:40 PM

I think she got a bad botox job around the eyes right before the trial. That's what's making her look 'off'. Pro tip, always be nice to your aesthetician.

by Anonymousreply 69March 22, 2023 4:49 PM

I’m surprised the accident happened in the first place. Michael Kennedy was her ski instructor when she was a teenager.

by Anonymousreply 70March 22, 2023 5:19 PM

[quote] Also, I think the turtleneck is to hide the layers of thick chains you usually see her wearing.

What? Those chains can be removed.

For some reason, the turtleneck looks odd, to me. She looks like she's on vacation in Aspen.

by Anonymousreply 71March 22, 2023 7:14 PM

She looks like what she is- a lifelong heavy smoker.

by Anonymousreply 72March 22, 2023 7:30 PM

Fortunately, she took the destructive criticism to heart and showed up today wearing a statement piece, makeup, and a decent hairstyle.

by Anonymousreply 73March 22, 2023 7:31 PM

She's actually in trial - going to he mat on this - Utah.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74March 22, 2023 7:36 PM

Jowls.

by Anonymousreply 75March 22, 2023 7:45 PM

She's certainly got some prime cock in her day- Brad, Ben, Chris and married one of the few straight producers who is rich and not a beast.

by Anonymousreply 76March 22, 2023 8:34 PM

She looks terrible in some pictures and good in others. She is too thin, and appears to have some facial her as well. Like her court look though.

And yes, i had the same question why wouldn’t she pay the 300k, but the initial claim was much higher, the judge reduced it. I am guessing she thought she was being grifted and had a chance to win.

by Anonymousreply 77March 22, 2023 8:48 PM

Why does she look like she's from Whoville?

by Anonymousreply 78March 22, 2023 8:50 PM

Here attorneys' fees for the trial are probably more than $300,000. But I guess it's the principle of the thing. I think, if she wins, the judge can order the plaintiff to pay her attorneys' fees, but he probably can't afford it. So, GOOP pays.

by Anonymousreply 79March 22, 2023 8:52 PM

I think she was high on pills and crashed into the man. Then had the balls to yell at him. Her lawyers are crap.

by Anonymousreply 80March 22, 2023 8:56 PM

She looks like Yoda in that pic.

by Anonymousreply 81March 22, 2023 9:03 PM

On Emily D Baker’s podcast today, she reported GP was being sued for 3.5 million not $300,000.

by Anonymousreply 82March 22, 2023 9:15 PM

[quote] Looks about right for 50 yrs old

You must be joking. In that photo she looks like she's at least two decades older than that.

by Anonymousreply 83March 22, 2023 9:38 PM

What about now everybody is comparing her look in court to Jeffrey Dahlmer? I guess it’s the glasses.

by Anonymousreply 84March 22, 2023 10:09 PM

In the OP, she looks like a parody of HRC. Where do you guys live that GOOP and her play-doh face look “good” for any age, let alone 50?

Paltrow has been caught on tape being reckless while operating a scooter. I don’t care enough about her or her problems to link it but she was carrying one of her kids as she swerved in front of a school bus.

I hope the she loses, if only as retribution for the audacity of that cooter-scented candle and trying to drag the public into the lie that she is presentable without the assistance of make-up.

by Anonymousreply 85March 22, 2023 10:30 PM

She’s a killer. She has transformed her looks to resemble Jeffrey Dahlmer.

by Anonymousreply 86March 22, 2023 10:38 PM

[quote] On Emily D Baker’s podcast today, she reported GP was being sued for 3.5 million not $300,000.

Here's what Forbes says about how much she's being sued for:

[quote] Terry Sanderson initially sued Paltrow over the incident in 2019 for $3.1 million—he later amended the complaint, ultimately seeking $300,000.

[quote] Paltrow countersued Sanderson, seeking “only symbolic damages in the amount of $1,” plus costs and attorneys’ fees, as her injuries from the incident “were relatively minor”—she pledged that any damages she wins will be donated to charity.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 87March 22, 2023 10:54 PM

It's Jeffrey Dahmer, not Dahlmer.

by Anonymousreply 88March 22, 2023 11:57 PM

She's valid and always has been. Who fucking cares how she looks?

by Anonymousreply 89March 23, 2023 12:22 AM

This guy is a scammer.

Paying him $300k for the pleasure of getting him to leave her the fuck alone? Eh. She is richer than Croesus, I understand why she would take it to trial to not show that she is not a mark for future blackmailers.

by Anonymousreply 90March 23, 2023 1:27 AM

Will the Coldplay Twink be asked to testify?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 91March 23, 2023 1:32 AM

I can’t believe they put chronic-pain doc and chronic pain Wendell Gibby on the stand. He’s been in the news since I was a kid, shrieking about a government “jihad” being waged against him.

He was (still is?) insistent on building a subdivision on protected land, and the criminal and civil cases, arrests, convictions, and overall drama have dragged on for decades.

Meanwhile, in certain photos, Goop looks a lot like Vladimir Putin from the nostrils down.

by Anonymousreply 92March 23, 2023 1:48 AM

If I'm a juror here, I could see from miles away the man suing and is not being truthful and is just after Goop's money. She could easily settle this but it's the principle she's fighting for. Good for her.

by Anonymousreply 93March 23, 2023 1:57 AM

R93 totally agree. If it were literally anyone else no one here would even question it. Shakedown from a mile away.

by Anonymousreply 94March 23, 2023 2:02 AM

If she skied away how did he know it was her?

by Anonymousreply 95March 23, 2023 2:11 AM

When you decide to go skiing don't you assume some risk?

by Anonymousreply 96March 23, 2023 2:25 AM

She skied away without ever looking back.

She stayed on the scene for 3-4 minutes.

She stayed for at least 10 minutes.

Pick one. But by the time you do, he'll probably be telling a new story.

by Anonymousreply 97March 23, 2023 2:32 AM

^^Sorry. I forgot to include the MARY! version, in which she stood with her back turned and refused to turn around and survey the carnage she wrought.

by Anonymousreply 98March 23, 2023 2:39 AM

What R46 said. This is not a normal 50, she looks 65.

I think she has an obvious eating disorder.

by Anonymousreply 99March 23, 2023 2:39 AM

She should pay him in vagina candles and ozone enemas. That’ll show him.

by Anonymousreply 100March 23, 2023 2:43 AM

R94 I know, right? It breaks my heart to see real injustice:

by Anonymousreply 101March 23, 2023 2:45 AM

I hope she gets the death penalty.

by Anonymousreply 102March 23, 2023 2:47 AM

Her upper lip/philtrum area is Simpsons cartoonish long in that photo, I never noticed this before

by Anonymousreply 103March 23, 2023 2:49 AM

I think she's a witch! We should burn her!

by Anonymousreply 104March 23, 2023 2:51 AM

Oh this is totally a money grab. Goop is a ridiculous charlatan but I'd be on her side as a juror in this case. .

by Anonymousreply 105March 23, 2023 2:55 AM

I hope she loses big.

by Anonymousreply 106March 23, 2023 2:58 AM

That looks like a smoker's mouth. Does she still smoke? I know she used to. It would fit the whole health goddess/snake oil salesman dynamic if she was secretly a rabid smoker while shilling her new age garbage.

by Anonymousreply 107March 23, 2023 3:24 AM

[Quote] and married one of the few straight producers who is rich and not a beast.

Feel free to elaborate on that at any time...

[Quote] Paltrow has been caught on tape being reckless while operating a scooter. I don’t care enough about her or her problems to link it but she was carrying one of her kids as she swerved in front of a school bus.

I posted a gif of the scooter "incident" in another Goop thread. She cut it real close.

by Anonymousreply 108March 23, 2023 3:26 AM

Here's his 2019 press conference announcing the lawsuit.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 109March 23, 2023 3:29 AM

I think Putin, Madonna and Gwynnie all share a plastic surgeon

by Anonymousreply 110March 23, 2023 3:55 AM

Does she really have to be there? I thought in civil cases you could skip court and let your lawyers handle everything.

by Anonymousreply 111March 23, 2023 4:34 AM

^^^ She and her children are expected to testify later this week. So, yeah, she has to be there.

by Anonymousreply 112March 23, 2023 4:37 AM

Her kids look like smug assholes.

by Anonymousreply 113March 23, 2023 5:02 AM

[quote] Does she really have to be there? I thought in civil cases you could skip court and let your lawyers handle everything.

No, you have to be in court.

by Anonymousreply 114March 23, 2023 5:33 AM

She’s had one of those old school facelifts, they pull up from the hairline and it pulls your eyebrows up off the brow line, you constantly look surprised. It makes you look nicer and you don’t get mean old lady face but it’s obvious.

by Anonymousreply 115March 23, 2023 6:45 AM

R103 that seems to happen to a lot of celebs who were overdo the fillers eg. Zooey Deschanel who also has an elongated philtrum

by Anonymousreply 116March 23, 2023 6:55 AM

Gwen was just on a Celebrity House rehab. She looked fine to me, certainly not 80!

by Anonymousreply 117March 23, 2023 7:34 AM

She needs to do a high speed chase in a white Bronco on and off the freeways of L.A. with Ryan Murphy driving to add a bit more action to this trial.

by Anonymousreply 118March 23, 2023 7:43 AM

She wants to look relatable and not like Alexis Carrington with a veil.

by Anonymousreply 119March 23, 2023 7:52 AM

What is it with the trend of ugly eyewear? Brooke Shields, Jamie Lee Curtis, now Goop. Ed McMahon glasses do not work on women.

by Anonymousreply 120March 23, 2023 9:09 AM

werk, gurl

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121March 23, 2023 9:16 AM

In the courtroom pictures she definitely looks as if she had some work done.

by Anonymousreply 122March 23, 2023 9:45 AM

Eyeglasses on older faces also require, at least, a subtle tint.

Even if you’re young, only the very prettiest or most handsome of faces, can get away with clear, no tint.

by Anonymousreply 123March 23, 2023 10:06 AM

She is so unbelievably tacky. I realize the nouveau worship her. But she is a money grubbing, attention-whore embarrassment, who can't ski. She is no WASP.

... she dropped out of UCSB. She's basically a Wellness Ralph Lauren.

by Anonymousreply 124March 23, 2023 11:19 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 125March 23, 2023 12:32 PM

Oops my poste got lost. To sum - it’s to say I can wear something ugly and still look good.

by Anonymousreply 126March 23, 2023 12:33 PM

A headline from the Independent.co.uk tells us what's a stake and what was lost:

[quote] Gwyneth Paltrow trial: Victim says he is now unable to enjoy wine tastings after ski collision

by Anonymousreply 127March 23, 2023 1:56 PM

Remember her quote about the frienemy that many took to be Winona

[quote] I restrained myself from fighting back. I tried to take the high road. But one day I heard that something unfortunate and humiliating had happened to this person. And my reaction was deep relief and…happiness. There went the high road,” she added.

by Anonymousreply 128March 23, 2023 2:24 PM

I’ve always hated Goop but r128’s quote just made me like her.

by Anonymousreply 129March 23, 2023 2:30 PM

[quote] It's Jeffrey Dahmer, not Dahlmer

Eat my ass!

by Anonymousreply 130March 23, 2023 5:16 PM

[quote] Eyeglasses on older faces also require, at least, a subtle tint. Even if you’re young, only the very prettiest or most handsome of faces, can get away with clear, no tint.

Disagree with this. The shape of the frame, vis-a-vis the individual's face, is more important.

by Anonymousreply 131March 23, 2023 6:28 PM

When did she have her upper lip replaced with a duck bill?

by Anonymousreply 132March 23, 2023 6:35 PM

R130- do it n upload it online

by Anonymousreply 133March 23, 2023 7:36 PM

R16- You are one VICIOUS queen 🫅.

Please,

sit next to me 🤣

by Anonymousreply 134March 23, 2023 7:43 PM

I am watching it now on youtube, and I feel bad for that family, they probably didn't except the case would be televised, now their entire family is under scrutiny, the attorney is bringing out every tidbit of their life and questioning everyone under the oath, the dad's divorce, the sister's mental state....the dirty laundry is all out and they will stay on youtube forever. I think they might even regret the case now, it's not worth it!

by Anonymousreply 135March 23, 2023 7:46 PM

^ expect

by Anonymousreply 136March 23, 2023 7:47 PM

Oh for god's sake, "older faces" do not require tinted lenses. The appearance of eye bags and wrinkles is not so horrific that we need to emply camouflage techniques, which tinted lenses won't accomplish anyway. And the statement about only "pretty people" is just too dumb to address.

What a moronic idea. Eyesight degrades with age so tinted lenses are obviously a bad idea, but R131 is correct that the shape of the face in relation to the shape of the lenses is what makes or breaks a pair of eyeglass frames for anyone at any age.

"Older faces...." I would love to see how R123 handles aging. Won't be pretty I can guarantee.

by Anonymousreply 137March 23, 2023 7:52 PM

R14, she looks pretty there . I think the lacking light , sad eyes and her dissociated affect has made her dull . I wonder what happened to her in childhood.

by Anonymousreply 138March 23, 2023 8:00 PM

Reposting the live feed for today....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 139March 23, 2023 8:15 PM

Has she started marketing a Court Room Personal Recovery Clutch on Goop yet, with touch-up hair and makeup travel size products, soothing essentials oils, rescue Valium, forever tears eye drops and “what, me worry?” organically sourced peppermint breath mints?

by Anonymousreply 140March 23, 2023 8:24 PM

Jeffrey Dahmer

by Anonymousreply 141March 23, 2023 8:39 PM

[quote]I am watching it now on youtube, and I feel bad for that family, they probably didn't except the case would be televised

They should have had a word with daddy, because from his one-hour press conference on, he has fought to have everything—even the most mundane hearing—made public.

The only time he wanted privacy was during discovery, when his lawyers argued that it was completely out of line for the defense (in a personal injury case!) to have access to their client’s medical and psych records. You can imagine how that went over.

by Anonymousreply 142March 23, 2023 8:45 PM

What was revealed about the victim's divorce?

by Anonymousreply 143March 23, 2023 9:40 PM

He can no longer enjoy wine tasting? Does this mean he's claiming a ski accident damaged his olfactory bulb?

by Anonymousreply 144March 23, 2023 10:02 PM

She should have settled. She is NOKD.

by Anonymousreply 145March 24, 2023 2:05 AM

His brain before the accident:

[quote]Lots of fine memories of last week;dining,dancing, band, wedding, Jenny, near rear-end experience that I peeled away from, 24 btles of wine.

[quote]cntd: a butiful pictur calld The Billy Boys from my frend, Sandee. Mercy was loaded. Lookd at a possible clinic locatn suggstd by frnd Cindy

[quote]ell, Hope Montana, I'll send you a link to this site and wait for your request. Then you'll have to reciprocate and let me follo u. Hugs GT

[quote]I 4got to mentn tht my frnd, Rich stopd to vst for "a day or 2" -was nice to hav him 3. We dncd at cncrts at Deer Valle and The Jewish Cntr

[quote]Interstn evnt last nite at concert wen getin redy to leave: A yung lady abt 28 sitting close by askd me if I was famous. . .I smiled (contd)

[quote](Can I do this here?). . .and sed hand me sumthin to autograph. She sed she dint want to be sittin nxt to sumone like Einstein and (contd)

[quote]find out latr. She said I had Einstein's hair but was much more handsome. 8^] Intrstn. . .and a familiar story told agin evn w shortr hair

[quote]Wen my receptnist askd which Dr a lady wantd to c, she said " the one with hair like Einstein". . .I just don't get it!

[quote]That was the first time this happened a couple of years ago. . .maybe I'm Jewish or just eating too many bagels. . .ya think?

After, it's just MAGAtry and the Olympics.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 146March 24, 2023 2:28 AM

Are you literally bringing Trump into this to make Goop look better?

Which PR firm are you with? Who keeps playing this 2018 bullshit hand? A. Let it go. He's over.

B. Two wrongs don't make a right. Everyone can be assholes here.

Gwyneth has destroyed her carefully polished veneer with this case, and revealed herself as the tacky, money grubbing poseur many of us knew she always was.

by Anonymousreply 147March 24, 2023 2:42 AM

She looks 65 and that stringy straight hair pulled away from her face does her no favours. The face lift is also really obvious. Jesus...what a wreck.

by Anonymousreply 148March 24, 2023 3:02 AM

I don't understand why people are saying she looks like Dahmer? Because she's blond and wears geeky big square glasses in court???

by Anonymousreply 149March 24, 2023 5:33 AM

She's counter suing for $1 plus attorney fees. That would have to put the jury on her side.

by Anonymousreply 150March 24, 2023 6:14 AM

she looks good for someone who wears sunscreen like highlighters. What procedures has she done

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 151March 24, 2023 6:45 AM

She looks mid 50s at least.

by Anonymousreply 152March 24, 2023 7:03 AM

You just know she's got one of her own marble benwa eggs up her hooha.

by Anonymousreply 153March 24, 2023 7:06 AM

[QUOTE]money grubbing poseur

How does this work for her in this scenario with a $1 countersuit, Einstein?

by Anonymousreply 154March 24, 2023 7:54 AM

R151 wow I always knew she had a “straight” build (as many tall, lanky women do) but I never realized she quite literally had no waist. Small curves are fine but that just looks…odd.

by Anonymousreply 155March 24, 2023 8:41 AM

R154, a. Attorney's fees, Jessica Reed Kraus, at least $250-500K by now.

B. The candles, dear. The hideously tacky candles. Don't you look me in the eye and tell me those aren't a money grab?

by Anonymousreply 156March 24, 2023 9:25 AM

The candles a publicity stunt. That worked. She wouldn’t have made that much money from them.

As for this trial, the man is a grifter.

by Anonymousreply 157March 24, 2023 9:53 AM

The candles she sells for $42,00 cost her $1.20

by Anonymousreply 158March 24, 2023 10:01 AM

And why can she sell such a vulgar product?

Because the buyer KNOWS she's such a CLASS ACT. It's ironic and cheeky.

Does this case HELP or HURT her that brand?

(She can't behave at a resort nor ski. It is material fact she is no class act.).

by Anonymousreply 159March 24, 2023 10:10 AM

Rumor has it she was trying to get the cameras to only shoot her from one side to hide her recent facelift

by Anonymousreply 160March 24, 2023 11:43 AM

When does the Snowy Ski Slope candle come out?

by Anonymousreply 161March 24, 2023 1:35 PM

DM says Judge ordered her and her team to stop bringing in "treats" for the Bailiffs.

WTF, how transparent.

by Anonymousreply 162March 24, 2023 1:59 PM

She's always had an old lady face and body to me. The lack of lips and waist are the culprits.

She has great legs I'll give her that.

by Anonymousreply 163March 24, 2023 5:29 PM

Her children look like little shits. So do Cindy Crawford's. Oddly Angelina jolies children look gentle and soft, Shiloh in particular.

by Anonymousreply 164March 24, 2023 10:18 PM

This case helps her brand because is in no way out of character for her to sue a grifter for $1 plus costs.

by Anonymousreply 165March 25, 2023 3:52 AM

Rape! Raping!! I was raped!

by Anonymousreply 166March 25, 2023 4:11 AM

R161 and what will it smell like?

R165 I think Taylor Swift did the same thing.

by Anonymousreply 167March 25, 2023 4:49 AM

What color ribbon shall I wear for Ski Rape Awareness?

by Anonymousreply 168March 25, 2023 5:07 AM

Let me know when you figure out the color.

by Anonymousreply 169March 25, 2023 5:15 AM

She’s despicable for verbalizing that she initially thought the crash was a sexual assault. A calculated move on her part to besmirch the plaintiff’s character, though not true, does put a tiny seed in people’s minds. Evil, nasty bitch.

by Anonymousreply 170March 25, 2023 5:20 AM

R170, I agree; horrible.

BUT after Amber Heard this could backfire.

If I were a juror, I'd see right through that transparent act of hers.

by Anonymousreply 171March 25, 2023 5:23 AM

The space between her nose and top lip is almost as long as the Vallée Blanche.

by Anonymousreply 172March 25, 2023 5:27 AM

Her lawyer was so fucking obnoxious. It’s almost like she was trying to get Gwynnie convicted and sentenced to death.

by Anonymousreply 173March 25, 2023 5:37 AM

So who should play Goop in the lifetime movie?

by Anonymousreply 174March 25, 2023 5:40 AM

That's because "she" was Sanderson's lawyer, R173.

by Anonymousreply 175March 25, 2023 5:42 AM

The guy's female attorney was pathetic today.

Gwen will win, and I believe her.

by Anonymousreply 176March 25, 2023 5:42 AM

#BelieveAllWitheredCrones

#StandWithHags

by Anonymousreply 177March 25, 2023 5:45 AM

[quote]I like her. She could easily pay, but doesn't feel she was in the wrong. Who cares about her makeup?

[quote]She's certainly got some prime cock in her day- Brad, Ben, Chris and married one of the few straight producers who is rich and not a beast.

[quote]The guy's female attorney was pathetic today. Gwen will win, and I believe her.

Calm down, sweetie. She doesn't know you're alive.

by Anonymousreply 178March 25, 2023 5:49 AM

Nor you, doll.

by Anonymousreply 179March 25, 2023 5:52 AM

R178 how pathetic to copy and paste 3 posts out of 178. You need a life.

by Anonymousreply 180March 25, 2023 6:08 AM

How is her triangle of sadness holding up during the trial?

by Anonymousreply 181March 25, 2023 6:12 AM

[quote]how pathetic to copy and paste 3 posts out of 178. You need a life.

Those were all from the same Goop-obsessed poster, doll. Try Celeb*tchy if you're going to be a Karen, Karen.

by Anonymousreply 182March 25, 2023 7:09 AM

[quote]I like her. She could easily pay, but doesn't feel she was in the wrong. Who cares about her makeup?

[quote]She's certainly got some prime cock in her day- Brad, Ben, Chris and married one of the few straight producers who is rich and not a beast.

[quote]Gwen was just on a Celebrity House rehab. She looked fine to me, certainly not 80!

[quote]The guy's female attorney was pathetic today. Gwen will win, and I believe her.

[quote]Nor you, doll.

[quote]R178 how pathetic to copy and paste 3 posts out of 178. You need a life.

These are all from YOU... doll. Anyone who stans Gwyneth Paltrow this hard needs to get a life.

by Anonymousreply 183March 25, 2023 7:16 AM

Gals, gals. If only you could put so much passion into Kevin McCarthy's adultery, the world would be such a better place.

by Anonymousreply 184March 25, 2023 7:20 AM

R183, stans? Not only are you pitiful, I don't give a fuck to search YOUR posts.

You must be a retard to think a few posts in a long thread is obsessive.

You can eat my ass, after a bad fusion Mexican/Indian restaurant in WeHo.

by Anonymousreply 185March 25, 2023 7:44 AM

R183 you really do need to get a life, hall monitor.

by Anonymousreply 186March 25, 2023 8:26 AM

[quote]The guy's female attorney was pathetic today.

I agree. The lady attorney was obnoxiously bad and should make the jury turn against the plaintiff.

by Anonymousreply 187March 25, 2023 8:37 AM

How does she have any money? I don’t she makes any real profits on all her stupid e-commerce website. Her expenses must be steep. Is she married to someone with money? That would explain the money pit business.

by Anonymousreply 188March 25, 2023 8:44 AM

Goop makes a lot of money.

by Anonymousreply 189March 25, 2023 10:46 AM

The most annoying thing about Goop's testimony was all the smirking she did as she answered questions. It seemed a little cra-cra like some over-the-hill Rhoda Penmark trying to put one over on her gullible Mom.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 190March 25, 2023 11:16 AM

Goop's alter ego

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 191March 25, 2023 11:35 AM

Ultimately, her court look is trying to replicate a well off Mormon frau who would command respect from her community because of her place in the “church” and illicit sympathy right?

by Anonymousreply 192March 25, 2023 12:41 PM

Yup, Yoda

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 193March 25, 2023 1:23 PM

She looks older than Blythe

by Anonymousreply 194March 25, 2023 1:27 PM

This is a nasty litigious gold digger who is suing GOOP because she has money.

by Anonymousreply 195March 25, 2023 1:38 PM

She will win, and those whore daughters will lose everything paying legal fees.

Cunts!

by Anonymousreply 196March 27, 2023 9:52 AM

The glasses and sweater are giving me Robert Evans.

by Anonymousreply 197March 27, 2023 10:23 AM

everyone is a fan, goop

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 198March 27, 2023 11:13 AM

gooped, gaged n beyonggg

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 199March 27, 2023 11:15 AM

That dizzy bitch is HIS lawyer?!

by Anonymousreply 200March 27, 2023 3:07 PM

There are some interesting comments on social media that his lawyer has been using inane fangirl flattery as a technique to gain Gwenyth's trust and lower her defenses.

by Anonymousreply 201March 27, 2023 3:18 PM

The day got off to a rousing start with Craig Ramon playing the town drunk on an ancient sitcom.

“Ya shee, occifer ::hiccup:: I woke up in the shnow, and the ::hiccup:: pink elephant wash shkiing away with my friend’sh head under her trunk, I shwear!”

And now we have the plaintiff on the stand.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 202March 27, 2023 4:03 PM

For anyone watching Court TV, try Emily Baker's live YouTube feed. It's more interesting with her commentary.

by Anonymousreply 203March 27, 2023 4:07 PM

R201, it worked like a brilliantly for Uncle Angelo's lawyer when he brought Dorothy and Stan to court because the apartment he was renting to them was not up to code.

by Anonymousreply 204March 27, 2023 4:40 PM

[quote] For anyone watching Court TV, try Emily Baker's live YouTube feed. It's more interesting with her commentary.

Thanks for that info. Her commentary is helpful. Here's the day 5 link to her livefeed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 205March 27, 2023 5:12 PM

Built straight up and down, like horsey faced Gisele Bundchen. But at least Fishsticks has better legs than Gisele.

by Anonymousreply 206March 27, 2023 7:16 PM

Since their stories are so vastly different, unless there is some compelling testimony to come, I'll bet the jurors find 50-50 fault, and call it a day. Each (or their insurance companies) will pay their own fees.

by Anonymousreply 207March 27, 2023 11:16 PM

[Quote]So who should play Goop in the lifetime movie?

Apple Martin was born for this role.

by Anonymousreply 208March 27, 2023 11:31 PM

Jennifer Collidge

by Anonymousreply 209March 27, 2023 11:49 PM

If they can't afford Apple, any school-production Carrie will be fine.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 210March 27, 2023 11:51 PM

R208 LOL

by Anonymousreply 211March 28, 2023 12:03 AM

Fun Article.

expert:

....A few years ago, Gwyneth stopped acting to focus on her lifestyle brand Goop, and I would be overjoyed if she now stopped that to focus on starring in court cases serving up this level of farm-to-table hilarity. “Private security for my client wanted to bring in treats for the bailiffs for how helpful they’ve been,” announced her lawyer one morning. “So, I wanted to do that transparently and see if there are any objections?” Alas, there were some objections. That basic bitch Lady Justice apparently says madam can’t treat-basket her way out of this one.

But you can’t keep a good wellness entrepreneur down. Every aesthetically challenging day in that hideous orange Utah legal facility, Gwyneth has swept in wearing category 5 neutrals, hopefully drawn from her own brand’s Courtroom Casuals line. (Though all Gwyneth’s garments are made from the neck hairs of these really incredible Himalayan goats to whose sheddings a normie like you could never have access, do be reassured they WILL be lovingly ripped off in never-pill nylon and available later this year as Halloween costumes.) Just as Goop is a place where food is never eaten, but “grabbed” or “reached for”, so it is that one of the best things Gwyneth’s website can say about any outfit is that it “takes you effortlessly” from one part of your day to another. In this case, from pursing your lips in court, to making that evening’s waiter give you the resume and achievements of every ingredient in the biodynamic salad, before pursing your lips once more and hissing: “No thank you, I’ll just have broth.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 212March 29, 2023 1:28 AM

She looks like her mother, but she's never been as pretty as her mother. I haven't seen photos of Blythe lately, but she was aging quite beautifully. Gwyneth did do a very good English accent in some of her films though.

by Anonymousreply 213March 29, 2023 1:47 AM

Blythe and Gwyneth should really consider doing a production of ‘Night Mother after this trial wraps up, she can wear this outfit.

by Anonymousreply 214March 29, 2023 2:06 AM

I literally hate everyone involved in this trial, including the people sitting behind the attorneys.

by Anonymousreply 215March 29, 2023 2:11 AM

Did anyone comment or notice the manner of how kid gloves and how flatteringly starstruck Paltrow's lawyer is questioning her and making in essence highlighting her celebrity? I'm amazed the judge allows that bs.

by Anonymousreply 216March 29, 2023 3:00 AM

Bitch stole my look today.

Marlene

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 217March 29, 2023 3:22 AM

Steve Owens was starstruck, r216? I must have missed that. He comes across exactly as what he is: a guy who represents insurance companies and who is most comfortable with depositions and settlements…not this clusterfuck.

If you’re talking about the woman who thought she was clever playing hey-girl-let’s-talk-about-heels games that even the dumbest 1L would advise against, that’s Kristin VanOrman. She’s one of the plaintiff’s attorneys.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 218March 29, 2023 4:14 AM

She looks fine. She's being railroaded and refuses to let it happen. I like that.

by Anonymousreply 219March 29, 2023 4:38 AM

Lucky Gwen.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 220March 29, 2023 6:37 AM

Kristin Vanorman also known as Diane Keaton

by Anonymousreply 221March 29, 2023 7:32 AM

I keep wondering what’s going through Paltrow’s mind when she looks at that basset hound faced lawyer with the ironed straw hair and cheap, ill fitting blouses and suit jackets. She must really look done on her.

And yet that homely bitch is smart to some degree and probably didn’t have to suck an obese slob’s cheesy, sweaty malformed dick to have a decent career.

by Anonymousreply 222March 29, 2023 1:14 PM

DOWN on her, not done

by Anonymousreply 223March 29, 2023 1:14 PM

Blonds generally don’t age well

by Anonymousreply 224March 29, 2023 1:27 PM

Maybe if I write it in Caps, she'll hear..nah..She knows all, sees all, is all things to everyone. Freshly steamed vag & all.

I'll write it anyway. You have loads of money, break down..PAY A STYLIST.

BTW. In one of her big..reveal moments she shared how she & new victim aka hubby lived apart for a year after they first married. She said it was due to parenting issues. Always wondered what the real deal was & is.

by Anonymousreply 225March 29, 2023 1:31 PM

Vanorman isn't starstruck, she's just being a smart ass bitch who thinks she's clever enough to intimidate Paltrow. Paltrow didn't get to where she is today because she's a shrinking violet.

by Anonymousreply 226March 29, 2023 2:40 PM

[Quote] And yet that homely bitch is smart to some degree and probably didn’t have to suck an obese slob’s cheesy, sweaty malformed dick to have a decent career.

Goop is the original Harvey's girl.

by Anonymousreply 227March 29, 2023 2:55 PM

Sanderson’s attorney is REALLY funny.

She missed her calling. She should have gone into comedy.

She reminds me of Gilda Radner! I really like her.

What say you, DL?

by Anonymousreply 228March 30, 2023 5:02 AM

The guy suing shit himself on the stand today. He's losing.

by Anonymousreply 229March 30, 2023 6:27 AM

All good picks

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 230March 30, 2023 6:31 AM

this was an accident, how can she be liable? If his account of events is true, he should be suing the ski resort, who has to be more liable than another guest? This lawsuit makes no sense.

by Anonymousreply 231March 30, 2023 6:43 AM

The resort was already released from liability.

by Anonymousreply 232March 30, 2023 6:49 AM

He tried to sue the ski resort and failed/lost. People sometimes ski into each other on snow and ice on a busy ski run, and the back of the ski ticket at the resort notifies the skier that they are assuming risk just by being there. He claims he was just skiing along safely, and she recklessly crashed into him and caused damages. She pretty much maintains that the opposite happened.

by Anonymousreply 233March 30, 2023 6:54 AM

Isn't it odd there isn't any footage anywhere of the accident? It happened on a beginner slope near the lodge so you'd expect resort cameras or other vacationers to have picked some action up.

by Anonymousreply 234March 30, 2023 7:10 AM

^especially at a higher end ski resort. Wouldn't security cameras along the runs be expected?

by Anonymousreply 235March 30, 2023 7:16 AM

Something tells me they don't have vagina steamers on death row. The're gonna find a heap of dried-up skin when it's her time for the chair.

by Anonymousreply 236March 30, 2023 7:18 AM

That attempt at humor is as tired as your asshole.

by Anonymousreply 237March 30, 2023 7:19 AM

Where was Goop’s bodyguard during all this, when will they take the stand?

by Anonymousreply 238March 30, 2023 7:29 AM

It's going to rhe jury, no more witnesses.

by Anonymousreply 239March 30, 2023 7:39 AM

Today's cross didn't disappoint. I loved it when he was allowed to go off on a tangent about the "pain of suing a celebrity," which apparently involves being insulted and insulted and insulted while simultaneously being ignored. "Ignored! IGNORE...ance!!"

He had to take a stand because:

"What is going on here? This is obviously an issue that someone needs to be accountable for. If they're never accountable, what are they going to do? They're going to do it again! Now we have the molesting of young children on an island, and..." Objection!

by Anonymousreply 240March 30, 2023 7:40 AM

^^Sorry, that happened during direct.

Cross had the car-ignition breathalyzer; ~80 photos of the "self-imposed recluse" globetrotting after the accident; and his assertion that the VA doctors got it twisted and "blindness" is really just a figure of speech.

Owens: "But you're an optometrist."

by Anonymousreply 241March 30, 2023 7:49 AM

[QUOTE]Now we have the molesting of young children on an island, and..." Objection!

Did you slip that in, r240, or did he really try to bring up Epstein?

by Anonymousreply 242March 30, 2023 4:54 PM

If anything, this case exposes Paltrow’s extreme cuntitude. And it’s causing her stress. I don’t think her vaginal eggs will help her with any of that.

by Anonymousreply 243March 30, 2023 5:18 PM

i hate her too guys but this dude is a complete bullshit artist

by Anonymousreply 244March 30, 2023 5:35 PM

R242 -

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 245March 30, 2023 8:04 PM

I can see why she didn't want to give this grifter any money.

by Anonymousreply 246March 30, 2023 8:17 PM

She's so un-wrong. They should consciously un-agree to validate his claim, and pop a jade egg up his ---.to cleanse him from his toxicity.

by Anonymousreply 247March 30, 2023 8:33 PM

R220 it looks like he is sucking in his gut in all those yacht pictures. Which is weird because it also looks like he has a flat stomach, so need to suck it in more.

by Anonymousreply 248March 30, 2023 9:31 PM

Live streaming the verdict.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 249March 30, 2023 10:31 PM

^^ Inside Edition says Verdict will be in 5 to 15 minutes from now.

by Anonymousreply 250March 30, 2023 10:33 PM

Fish Stick Paltrow walks away with her pussy candle monies.

by Anonymousreply 251March 30, 2023 10:40 PM

R244: and not a very good one.

by Anonymousreply 252March 30, 2023 10:42 PM

$1 to GP.

by Anonymousreply 253March 30, 2023 10:42 PM

Now this guy pays her years of legal fees

by Anonymousreply 254March 30, 2023 10:43 PM

She's the anti-Trump! Free at last to... fuck with the earth's headspace.

This is... a day for American justice. And vagina related merchandising.

by Anonymousreply 255March 30, 2023 10:45 PM

The determination as to whether he pays her legal fees will be in a separate hearing, and her lawyers may have to prove Sanderson brought this to trial "in bad faith" according to Emily Baker's Youtube commentary.

by Anonymousreply 256March 30, 2023 10:52 PM

Thanks, r256. I stand corrected

by Anonymousreply 257March 30, 2023 10:56 PM

On her way out of the courtroom, Paltrow touched the Plaintiff's shoulder and said that she wished him well, and then quickly left.

by Anonymousreply 258March 30, 2023 11:02 PM

She got away with murder.

by Anonymousreply 259March 30, 2023 11:06 PM

R258 Not Namaste?

by Anonymousreply 260March 30, 2023 11:07 PM

Did she really touch his arm? How cunty! That’s a move that real assholes make.

by Anonymousreply 261March 30, 2023 11:10 PM

The plaintiff and his lawyer said that she was very nice to say that goodbye to him. They were actually happy about it, and said so in a non-sarcastic way.

by Anonymousreply 262March 30, 2023 11:18 PM

Happiness is winning.

I think she and her lawyers are smart to say almost nothing about the trial right now, especially if the plaintiff could make a timely decision to appeal. It appears unlikely that he'd do that, but there's no reason to piss him off, just in case.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 263March 31, 2023 1:52 AM

No Prisoner theme song for Gwen.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 264March 31, 2023 2:12 AM

He doesn't have time for an appeal. His main concern now is rehabilitating his image on the dating apps. He mentioned it for the fourth and hopefully final time when he was drawn like a moth to the cameras outside the door today as Sykes and Buhler tried in vain to keep him moving.

I will give him credit for not grabbing his chest and dropping to the floor when the verdict was read. After seeing his face drop when his lawyers were laughing, after-hours, with the defense team about Sykes saying he's "just a country lawyer," I fully expected a scene.

This is General Conference weekend, so I doubt they'll even shoot him a text to see how he's holding up.

by Anonymousreply 265March 31, 2023 2:35 AM

😁 He doesn't realize he lost. He thought Goop was being a good sport when she wished him well.

He can't quite connect the dots with his [italic] Traumatic Brain Injury.

by Anonymousreply 266March 31, 2023 3:26 AM

goop wins. I think her legal team told her she would win too.

by Anonymousreply 267March 31, 2023 7:10 AM

Bunny

by Anonymousreply 268March 31, 2023 7:22 AM

Song of Triumph

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 269March 31, 2023 7:46 AM

Hit it!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 270March 31, 2023 7:47 AM

the judge has a very calming voice.

by Anonymousreply 271March 31, 2023 8:31 AM

Goop Seems like an unhappy person. I wonder what her childhood was like

by Anonymousreply 272March 31, 2023 4:45 PM

Maybe you should be a little less concerned about how traumatic her childhood was for her and a bit more concerned about how traumatic her childhood was for those caught in the crossfire.

by Anonymousreply 273March 31, 2023 9:08 PM

Ski Crash Doctor Considering an Appeal

[quote] Robert Sykes, attorney for Dr. Terry Sanderson tells TMZ ... "We sincerely disagree with the outcome and will consider all options moving forward .... including a motion to the court for a new trial or a possible appeal. All of those things are on the table."

[quote] Sykes says he believes there were a number of errors made in the case that could form the basis of an appeal. He says one issue is that the judge allowed Gwyneth's lawyers to dig into Terry's past, which they insist was "totally unrelated" to the collision on the mountain but didn't allow his lawyers the same with respect to Paltrow's past.

They supposedly have a limited time to make an appeal, maybe 30 days after the verdict (but I'm not sure about that exact deadline).

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 274April 1, 2023 3:27 PM

Some commentor on a New York Post article about a possible appeal made this point:

[quote] Lawyer is trying to get his client off the hook for GP's legal fees. Hail Mary that she will settle and not go to trial again.

The threat of appeal may be the bargaining chip to get Paltrow's lawyers to stop asking the court for Sanderson to pay her legal fees. This does makes some sense.

by Anonymousreply 275April 1, 2023 3:34 PM

She looks like 💩.

by Anonymousreply 276April 1, 2023 4:46 PM

This would have been more fun during lockdown.

by Anonymousreply 277April 1, 2023 7:03 PM

She shouldn't budge. This is a nuisance lawsuit by a person with BPD. Fuck him.

by Anonymousreply 278April 1, 2023 7:06 PM

I´m canceling the GOOP-newsletter while wolfing down a Martha Stewart cake here.

by Anonymousreply 279April 6, 2023 11:59 AM

Isn't she now working on some orgasm product where she teaches women how to cum? Curious way to follow up this court case especially since she looks frigid in all recent photos.

by Anonymousreply 280April 7, 2023 6:50 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!