Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Royals "Don't Want to Socialize" with Sussexes at Coronation, Hope They'll Be "Seated in Iceland"

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have officially been invited to King Charles' upcoming coronation after a ton of speculation about whether the royals would include them on the guest list. In fact, the couples' rep released a statement confirming the news, simply saying "I can confirm The Duke has recently received email correspondence from His Majesty's office regarding the coronation. An immediate decision on whether The Duke and Duchess will attend will not be disclosed by us at this time."

While the Sussexes still haven't made said decision, there are rumors that they will be in attendance at the event—and sources tell the Daily Mail that the royals have no desire to socialize with them.

Per a friend of the royal family who spoke to the outlet, "They will be given the cold shoulder by very many relatives. One said to me, I hope they’ll be seated in Iceland. Many of the family just want nothing more to do with them. If they have to see them at the Coronation then so be it, but they do not want to socialize with them."

The Daily Mail also reports that Meghan and Harry will stay at Frogmore Cottage should they attend the coronation, despite the fact that they're being evicted from the property—something their rep also confirmed with a statement saying "We can confirm the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been requested to vacate their residence at Frogmore Cottage."

While the couples' lease on Frogmore Cottage runs out in March, apparently they've been allowed to extend it for just a few months to arrange the transportation of their belongings to California.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 268March 26, 2023 9:58 PM

Our pussies stink.

by Anonymousreply 1March 15, 2023 12:44 AM


by Anonymousreply 2March 15, 2023 12:44 AM

Why does William have so much hate for his brother? What? Because he married a black woman?? Princess Diana (RIP)must be rolling in her grave .

by Anonymousreply 3March 15, 2023 12:46 AM

Those BRF cunts are total CUNTS!

No wonder Meghan wanted to get away from them.

by Anonymousreply 4March 15, 2023 12:47 AM

OP which one of Charlies Angels is you?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5March 15, 2023 12:49 AM

They are treating the Sussexes just as they would have treated Diana. This is why I hope they act with dignity, attend the coronations of His Majesty and the Queen Adulterers, in any presence as directed, and as the RF departs behind closed doors, the Sussexes visit DIANA'S charities, drop some heavy coin, and leave for CA. Coronation day is the day Diana would have become queen.

Suck it, Rottweiler, there are STILL three people in the marriage.

by Anonymousreply 6March 15, 2023 12:53 AM

I can't wait to see Sophie glare at MM and hear the boos.

by Anonymousreply 7March 15, 2023 12:56 AM

Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh.

by Anonymousreply 8March 15, 2023 1:00 AM

Queen Cuntsort disses commonwealth dancers and leaves Charlie alone on the stoop. Is this rat bag deliberately trying to destroy the monarchy or did she just need a gin and tonic?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9March 15, 2023 1:06 AM

[quote] Why does William have so much hate for his brother?

Maybe because his brother sold his whole family’s privacy to Netflix and Bantam Books for a big bag of money.

I’d hate my brother if he did that too, and I certainly wouldn’t be keen on any more chats which could be twisted into material for the next edition of Diaries of a Ginger Whinger.

by Anonymousreply 10March 15, 2023 1:08 AM

R9 Who the bloody hell does this nasty old racist skank appeal to other then other old nasty racist skanks like R10?

by Anonymousreply 11March 15, 2023 1:17 AM

Royal Reporters have admitted that the brf leaked info on the Sussex and that most of the leaks came from Kensington Palace. So Williams crew. They can't whinge about Harry revealing private info if they are doing the same thing.

by Anonymousreply 12March 15, 2023 1:20 AM

It's got so bad for the BRF they have initiated a training program for Reporters who cover the BRF. They will be given training on how to cover Royal reporting. Journalists are supposed to be impartial not guided when reporting. The second issue is that the charity that is suppose to be impartially mentoring these reporters is run by Camillas friend. Her daughter attended the Piers/Clarkson lunch and her step daughter is married to the Blackamoor brooch Royals son. Impartial my ass. When journalists are told what, when and how to report its right out of the fascist playbook.

by Anonymousreply 13March 15, 2023 1:29 AM

Right! The Harkles wanted nothing to do with the BRF which is why they renounced their titles and didn't want titles for their kids! Oh, wait...

by Anonymousreply 14March 15, 2023 1:35 AM

R3 Willy is a 40 yo angry man baby like his Pa. In Spare Harry describes how Willy spent a week literally screaming and yelling at him because Harry got "permission " from the Queen to wear his beard at his wedding. Willy demanded that if he the Heir was forced to shave then the Spare should have to also. Willy went so far as to plan to get Harry pissed at his Batchelor party and forcible shave off his beard. WTF? This from a 36 yo man.Harry says his bro is compulsively competitive with him and his out of control rage is because he as the heir is so tightly controlled by the palace officials he hates. When he heard Harry was going to Africa on a wildlife conservation tour he pounded the table and said No! No! Africa is Mine Mine! Then comes the physical violence. Anyone checking anorexic Katie for bruises.? William is an angry violent control freak Just look at him. One day he will go off on camera and that will be the end of him. That's why he hates his own brother. Besides Diana loved Harry more.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15March 15, 2023 1:44 AM

Rubbish! This why William hates Harry..

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16March 15, 2023 1:47 AM

"They are treating the Sussexes just as they would have treated Diana"

Had Diana, Princess of Wales lived don't believe she would be treated horribly by BRF at either funeral of QEII and or coronation. Though both events would likely be awkward for Diana as a divorced former royal, it was made clear even after HM took away the HRH that Diana was still part of the royal family.

While Diana likely may have attended some private events surrounding the coronation such as balls or parties, you can hardly expect her to be invited to her ex-husband's coronation. More so since the adulteress CPB who is widely blamed for busting up the Waleses marriage is going to be crowned queen consort. It would have been like Catherine of Aragon attending the coronation of Anne Boleyn.

by Anonymousreply 17March 15, 2023 1:52 AM

Interesting at R9.

Those Maori people from New Zealand performed that as a tribute/honor to the King and Queen Consort.

They are subjects and part of the British Commonwealth, and it was a "gift" of sorts to the King and his wife.

The fact that Camilla completely disregarded that performance is so rude and crass, that I almost find it unbelievable she would behave that way.

by Anonymousreply 18March 15, 2023 1:53 AM

Camilla's 92yo mother in law could make time to pause and pay her respects. But then Elizabeth was a real Queen and not a drunken jacked up Side Piece.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19March 15, 2023 2:03 AM

You mean, it would have been uncomfortable for Diana to witness her ex-husband and his correspondent being crowned? A glory of Adulterers. There STILL would have been three in the marriage.

by Anonymousreply 20March 15, 2023 2:05 AM

r16, keep that picture handy when people ask what "beef curtains" are.

by Anonymousreply 21March 15, 2023 2:07 AM

Some Deranger Thread Fumigant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 22March 15, 2023 2:09 AM

William probably inherits his explosive violent temper from his great grand father George VI who was notorious for his apoplectic rages which sent his family, courtiers and servants running for cover.

by Anonymousreply 23March 15, 2023 2:13 AM

Too many deluded sugars here. Lol.

by Anonymousreply 24March 15, 2023 2:14 AM

William is jealous of Harry's todger.

by Anonymousreply 25March 15, 2023 2:16 AM

^ He bloody well should be.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26March 15, 2023 2:22 AM

Harry and Meghan should just stay in the US where they are beloved luminaries. Honored guests at the Oscars, center stage at the State of the Union, giving important speeches in the California legislature.

by Anonymousreply 27March 15, 2023 2:25 AM

[QUOTE]Had Diana, Princess of Wales lived don't believe she would be treated horribly by BRF at either funeral of QEII and or coronation.

I also don't think Diana would attend the coronation, but I don't think she'd be treated badly at all. Certainly not with William and Harry around. Who know by then, she may have led a quiet redeeming life. Even she understood the Panorama interview was a mistake.

by Anonymousreply 28March 15, 2023 2:30 AM

There would be no point in Diana attended KC3's coronation, she likely wouldn't have received an invitation but understood why and was ok with things.

Like to think Diana would have offered to mind any of Prince William's children (her grandchildren) if they weren't involved or otherwise attending the coronation.

by Anonymousreply 29March 15, 2023 2:38 AM

These are the evil old gits you lickspittles grovel to? Pathetic.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30March 15, 2023 2:49 AM

DL certainly is an authority on Queendom

by Anonymousreply 31March 15, 2023 2:51 AM

[quote] Archie and Lilibet 'not invited' to King Charles' coronation as Harry and Meghan 'set to be given cold shoulder'

Their parents Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will be invited, but will be "given the cold shoulder" by many relatives.

The couple have not been told whether their children, aged 3 and 1, will be included in the coronation, with one source saying that they are "very young".

The Sussexes have not confirmed whether they will be going to the royal event on May 6. The rift between Harry and the rest of the royal family after a series of explosive revelations in his book and Netflix documentary is still said to be painful.

Royal officials told Harry and Meghan that discussions could be held on whether Archie and Lilibet might be invited if they confirmed their own attendance at the coronation.

Options also include Harry going alone, or both of them staying away, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

But organisers painstakingly putting together plans for the event are working on the basis that they will attend.

Harry and Meghan may not be very popular with their family at the coronation and they will not be invited to take part in the official balcony appearance.

"They will be given the cold shoulder by very many relatives. One said to me, "I hope they'll be seated in Iceland," a friend of the royal family told the Mail.

The doubt over Archie and Lilibet's invitation is likely to further widen the rift between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

Prince William and Kate Middleton's children Prince George, 9, and Princess Charlotte, 7, are expected to go. Prince Louis, 5, is more of a doubt but still likely to be taken.

Meanwhile Camilla's teenage grandchildren are also expected to go. The Queen Consort had pushed for them to carry the canopy under which she would be anointed, but this plan was quashed.

Royal sources said it would be "wholly improper" to discuss Camilla's grandchildren attending but not some of the King's.

Charles himself was four when he attended his mother Queen Elizabeth's coronation, although he did not stay for the full three hours. Princess Anne was two and did not attend, although she was on the balcony for the official photographs later.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32March 15, 2023 2:52 AM

r20 Ask Julia Carling and a host of other women about what they think and feel about the topic of Diana and adultery. This deifying or making a saint out of Diana is incredibly regressive and immature.

by Anonymousreply 33March 15, 2023 2:56 AM

Why should Camilla give a shite?. She got what she schemed for for 30 years. She's looks like the cat he swallowed the canary.

by Anonymousreply 34March 15, 2023 2:56 AM

The cunt who swallowed the pidgeon

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35March 15, 2023 2:57 AM

R33 George isn't it time to powder your balls?

by Anonymousreply 36March 15, 2023 2:59 AM

There is no sense nor reason in packing up the Sussex sprogs and hauling them to UK for the coronation.

Their parents will have a very limited role (showing up, go where they are told to go, do what they are told to do and don't create a fuss), nor likely will be in UK very long anyway. Can't see either PH or MM high on anyone's guest list for various balls or parties being given in honor of event.

Bringing those children means also an entire encourage of child minders, supplies and so forth. Quite a lot of bother when their parents likely won't spend more than a few days in UK.

Finally the Markle woman won't have it because, as she has not let world forget, coronation day coincides with that of her son's birthday. To bring one or both sprogs would put any plans for a birthday party totally out. It would have to occur week or so before event or sometime afterward.

by Anonymousreply 37March 15, 2023 3:04 AM

R27 None of which they ever did but in your fetid imagination Dee.

by Anonymousreply 38March 15, 2023 3:06 AM

Harry should host his own coronation party in the UK, and get Elton John, Adele and Ed Sheeran to headline.

That would be fucking hilarious!!

It would be the party of the year, and completely take away from boring old William and Kate.

by Anonymousreply 39March 15, 2023 3:11 AM

Most of this stuff is made up by tabloids looking to sell their rags.

by Anonymousreply 40March 15, 2023 3:13 AM

Both brothers look like they have anger issues

by Anonymousreply 41March 15, 2023 3:25 AM

r36 Now you have indulged your moronic childish spite can you engage with the substance of my point? Why deify Diana? If other people are fair game for criticism so should she be-making such a central pivotal figure in this royal saga totally untouchable and above criticism is stupid and irrational.

by Anonymousreply 42March 15, 2023 3:50 AM

I think that Diana would decline the invitation in favor of waiting for one from Wills.

by Anonymousreply 43March 15, 2023 4:14 AM

I think Diana would be disgusted by the person that William has become.

by Anonymousreply 44March 15, 2023 4:16 AM

R42 SurvivingTrans We read your vile hatchet job on her George . Stick to your pathetic YouTube Channel and your Ruskie mail order "sons.".

by Anonymousreply 45March 15, 2023 4:17 AM

Diana would slap Harry across the face for what he's done.

by Anonymousreply 46March 15, 2023 4:17 AM

^ Sure Dee

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 47March 15, 2023 4:22 AM

Recall at one point Diana was thinking of moving to freedom in California. Glad her son and his wife fulfilled her dream for their family exiting the toxic waxworks that is the the BRF.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 48March 15, 2023 4:28 AM

Wait so now we are against the BRF and supportive of Harry? I can’t keep track.

Seriously it’s a cold and dysfunctional family bizarrely run by courtiers who seem to maintain consistency even when one of them quits

by Anonymousreply 49March 15, 2023 4:34 AM

r48 Yet still passionately cling to BRF titles for them and their children so not really free and unshackled at all from the so called toxic royal family.

Yet another opportunity to remind people they asked for half in half out .The narrative of wanting to break free and run to escape their pain was introduced latter on.

by Anonymousreply 50March 15, 2023 4:37 AM

The lying, grifting, hypocritical (“the RF are racists, yet we want their TITLES!”) South Parkles are global laughingstocks.

If they are so brazen as to attend the coronation, get out the popcorn and wine.

by Anonymousreply 51March 15, 2023 4:39 AM

r49 I think its more the case that they are using some of the proceeds of Spare to employ some bots and pretend fans to troll again, Ironic given their phoney stance on misinformation.

by Anonymousreply 52March 15, 2023 4:40 AM

Harry and the cretin he married are huge laughingstocks here in the U.S. they are constantly mocked. People are laughing at their pretentious for the surrogate children. It's just comical. They're going broke with that house and are getting desperate.

by Anonymousreply 53March 15, 2023 4:41 AM

Will hates Harry because Harry is an asshole. Harry seemed like a decent likable guy for many years. Granted, we didn't actually know him. But who knew that Harry wasn't just an asshole, but turned out to be a person who is a lying, grifting narcissist who cannot be trusted and wallows in victimhood while throwing his family under the bus. Who knew that Harry is just rather a rotten person?

William, Kate and the rest of them are not perfect, but they didn't bank their livelihood on being lying grifters. Charles and Camilla are no prizes. They set out to destroy Diana's marriage before it even began. But as wrong as that was, it was a marital dispute. This bullshit that Harry and Markle have pulled is unforgiveable.

The entire UK threw these grifting Markles a $38 million wedding. The country loved both of them. No one started hating them until they became lying, mercenary thugs. And it has NOTHING to do with Markle being of mixed race.

Markle is still talking about "Kate made me cry." Don't ever forget that a grown woman is still bitching about crying over a child's bridesmaid dress from almost five years ago. This is no reason to try and destroy the monarchy even if Markle hated it.

There was one journalist who wrote about Markle being "straight outa Compton." And it was an American journalist--not a British journalist. Markle plays the victim and lies--and so does her asshole husband.

by Anonymousreply 54March 15, 2023 4:46 AM

There is no way in hell that the Markles will miss the coronation. They can bitch all they want about "not knowing if they will attend." Yeah, right.

These two lying, evil, money-grubbing, narcissists wouldn't miss the coronation and all the worldwide publicity that will come as a result ever, never, ever, never. Unfortunately, they will be there despite this deceitful, threatening, cat-and-mouse game they're trying to play. Markle NEVER misses a camera pointed her way. And Harry the put-upon, lying victim will do what she tells him to do. They have 16 bathrooms to pay for in Montecito. And when you are Meghan Markle there is never enough money no matter what you have to do to get it.

by Anonymousreply 55March 15, 2023 4:56 AM

R50 SurvivingTrans the same dotty gargoyles(like you George) who hated his mum hate Harry and for the same reasons. Different lipstick same ugly pig. You fool no one. Fortunately you're dying off. Now go tape your todger it's flapping.

by Anonymousreply 56March 15, 2023 4:56 AM

Laughable that the Derangers who rant here have never bothered to read Spare. Like the Trumpers who take it as "fact" the election was stolen. Same delusional mind set.Derangers and Deplorables tick off all the same boxes. Cultist gotta cult in Murica or UK.

by Anonymousreply 57March 15, 2023 5:02 AM

All jokes & snark aside? I’m am TRULY impressed AF, that Harry got the fuck away from this profoundly dysfunctional family.

I understand that there are MANY lackeys here, who carry water for the British Royal Family, obviously rooted in their own self interests.

The above being stated, Harry is up against some of the MOST ruthless people around. This is the real version of GoT. Not only this? He grew up with these people.

Imagine growing up this way? No love. Just pomp & circumstance.

But by Gawd! The boy got the fuck out, and isn’t as beholden as his predecessor.

It really is a fascinating tale for the ages.

This man chose himself above the Firm. That’s a VERY big deal, & if I ever see him somewhere (I won’t) I’d love to give him a huge, warm hug, and thank him ever so much, for showing us what it means to have boundaries.

I’m SO glad he finally got “it”, & got out before history repeated itself.

by Anonymousreply 58March 15, 2023 5:03 AM

R55 GOOGLE : Working for a living

by Anonymousreply 59March 15, 2023 5:05 AM

R54 Speaking of husbands arse holes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60March 15, 2023 5:08 AM

Great post, R58!

So true.

by Anonymousreply 61March 15, 2023 5:11 AM

Oh big deal. Who hasn’t had to deal with relatives they’d rather not see at important family rituals like funerals and coronations?

by Anonymousreply 62March 15, 2023 5:14 AM

The “real version of game of thrones?” There is no question of who is next in line. It’s been peaceful since 1688 and will remain so until there is just one life between Charlotte and the throne. Then all bets are off.

by Anonymousreply 63March 15, 2023 5:17 AM

The grasping at the titles for the kids was pretty pathetic. If you want out of the RF, why would you care unless there’s something deeply hypocritical about you.

by Anonymousreply 64March 15, 2023 5:21 AM

R54 More CAPs that makes it true. Now keep you eyes on the road Dee.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65March 15, 2023 5:23 AM

r52" I think its more the case that they are using some of the proceeds of Spare to employ some bots and pretend fans to troll again, Ironic given their phoney stance on misinformation."

Self awareness is not your strong suit George . Misinformation as when you claimed per" your unimpeachable source " that Her Late Majesty was in the best of health only had a case of "piles "three weeks before she died. As for "phoney brides" think your late hubby had a lot to say about that in a court of law. BTW I never saw you in line to pay your respects to the the Queen who you claimed you"worshiped the ground she walked on" Were there no gender neutral loos at St James or did you pay your two fan bots to queue for you? Or perhaps you had a rug sale at your shop that day. Shite happens.

by Anonymousreply 66March 15, 2023 5:39 AM

[quote]I’m am TRULY impressed AF, that Harry got the fuck away from this profoundly dysfunctional family.

R58. Harry and his wife are the most dysfunctional of all and then perpetuate their dysfunction to make money no matter how they do it even while savaging the royal family. They are not trying to heal. They cannot be trusted. They are perpetual paid lying, grifting, mean-spirited narcissists. They are despicable. They deserve no sympathy.

by Anonymousreply 67March 15, 2023 6:19 AM

The Markles certainly weren't complaining when the royal family and the entire UK threw them a $38 million wedding. The Markles are grifting liars still sucking off the teat of the royal family because without their royal connection, they are nothing.

by Anonymousreply 68March 15, 2023 6:23 AM

You gotta wonder what is wrong with people who support this kind of trash. You have to have several screws loose to support such terrible people like H&M. There's something really wrong with you.

by Anonymousreply 69March 15, 2023 6:51 AM

R69 people get so committed to a narrative that when proven wrong they can’t face that they’ve been duped and they double down. I think that’s the majority of LSA Markle lovers.

by Anonymousreply 70March 15, 2023 6:58 AM

Tie Harry and Meghan to chairs and force them to watch a certain South Park episode over and over and over again until one of them explodes.

by Anonymousreply 71March 15, 2023 7:03 AM

[QUOTE]This is why I hope they act with dignity, attend the coronations of His Majesty and the Queen Adulterers,

Why should the frequent more frequent adultress, Diana be included on the Coronation list? She had quite a list of prime men pumping her IN THEIR PRIME, yet DLers cannot apportion Diana's horrible personality to the side.

And. since her oldest son William knew about all this as he was chosen as his mum's closest confidante. Does this sound like good, healthy, or desirable arrangement?

It's a mind fuck ain't it? Yet, the Sussex "demands" crack me the fuck up, especially since Megs has jet approval for the cartoon-named Princess Lilibet.

by Anonymousreply 72March 15, 2023 7:19 AM

^ Forgot to link.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73March 15, 2023 7:21 AM

Agreed, r69. The Harkles seem to attract some genuinely mentally ill online stans. Their fandom is among the most toxic out there, regularly making death threats and doxxing people. On here they also post graphic straight porn, to what end I'm not sure. I really think one of them is going to harm someone in the real world and it's only a matter of time. I wonder what it is about the couple that almost exclusively attracts such severely mentally ill people.

by Anonymousreply 74March 15, 2023 7:22 AM

[quote]"I can confirm The Duke has recently received email correspondence from His Majesty's office regarding the coronation. An immediate decision on whether The Duke and Duchess will attend will not be disclosed by us at this time."

Are we sure they are invited? This careful wording doesn't say that.

by Anonymousreply 75March 15, 2023 7:42 AM

Love seeing everyone gang up on the rancid Klan Granny chief, SurvivingRacist! Long may it last.

by Anonymousreply 76March 15, 2023 8:18 AM

[QUOTE] On here they also post graphic straight porn.

Mary! They're manips, Grandma.

by Anonymousreply 77March 15, 2023 8:20 AM

r56 Lady Colin Campbell never hated Diana. Can't you do nuance? Is everyone a pantomime villian or angel in your childish way of looking at the world? She has said good and bad and measured things about Diana on her YouTube channel and elsewhere.

r66 I think you will find I highlighted what a public source said about the Queens health and never made a claim in my own right. Falsely calling me George all the time suggests you are a puerile , malicious and desperate soul.

by Anonymousreply 78March 15, 2023 9:12 AM

The Harkles are probably balking at being relegated to the third-tier, non-working royals. Gotta keep up the pretense of connection to the RF to keep that grift going.

by Anonymousreply 79March 15, 2023 2:52 PM

R78 George the only cunt you ever possessed was your character.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80March 15, 2023 4:08 PM

[quote] Her daughter attended the Piers/Clarkson lunch and her step daughter is married to the Blackamoor brooch Royals son. Impartial my ass. When journalists are told what, when and how to report its right out of the fascist playbook.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81March 15, 2023 4:12 PM

Selling the dirt on the BRF seems to have worked out well for Harry. People bought the book in record numbers, and DataLounge just can't stop starting new threads, keeping the Royal Dream alive and well. Who is REALLY the sick one here?

by Anonymousreply 82March 15, 2023 4:27 PM

[quote] Who is REALLY the sick one here?

You, r82, for still swallowing the grifters' bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 83March 15, 2023 4:35 PM

Would you want to socialize with your relative and his wife who just trashed your family, aired its dirty laundry, and shat on its raison d'etre?

Who markets his titles? Who endlessly complains about media coverage, but courts it as it suits him?

I wouldn't.

by Anonymousreply 84March 15, 2023 4:39 PM

How dare William not want to socialize with him! It's clearly because his wife is black, NOT because Harry just slammed him mercilessly in his book!

by Anonymousreply 85March 15, 2023 4:45 PM

In Spare Harry labels three of the most insidious corrupt palace life time courtiers: The Bee,The Fly and The Wasp . Because they all sting members of the family sooner or later. They live to scheme , disassemble and leak stores to the ROTA (Royal press corps) about their favored and unfavored Windsors. They are like the palace eunuchs. Vayrs from GOT for real. They propagandize and spin to make Charlie look good even if the have to make his sons( both Willy & Harry and their wives ) look bad. These are the back stabbing "Grey Men" that Diana spoke of. They set out to destroy Diana in the press and they set out to do the the same with Meghan especially after the Sussexes tour of S. Africa got world wide favorable reviews. As with Diana overshadowing Charlie the 'Grey Men" would not permit the Sussexes to become more popular then Charles & Camilla. Their Pa's Side -Piece has a boatload of writers and reporters that are personal friends she has groomed over the last thirty years to re-hab her own sordid image. They gladly vomit up the stories the Queen Cuntsort spoon feeds them. Both Harry and William demanded a meeting with the Queen and Charles regarding these out of control slanderous "planted" stories. When they walked in the room The Bee,The Fly and The Wasp were sitting at the table. "Is this true? Her Majesty The Queen asked. "No ma'am !" they replied in unison. Any wonder why Harry and Meghan took their family and fled this nest of vipers.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 86March 15, 2023 4:54 PM

Harry would happily miss his father's coronation. It's that yacht-girl C-lister psycho pushing this humiliation on the Harkles. She would crawl over broken glass to be photographed at that ceremony. She has no shame and no pride, she convinces Harry not to have any either.

She needs the Coronation Chapter, with photos, for her memoir/fantasy book. They must appear to be royal adjacent, no matter that the real royals shun them like the plague. Those without pride or shame pretend not to notice they're in the Siberia seating section and everyone is studiously silent.

I wonder if they'll have Handsome Johnny sitting right behind them again, watching their every move?

by Anonymousreply 87March 15, 2023 5:57 PM

[QUOTE]This man chose himself above the Firm. That’s a VERY big deal, & if I ever see him somewhere (I won’t) I’d love to give him a huge, warm hug, and thank him ever so much, for showing us what it means to have boundaries.

🤣 This isn't a joke post?

Of course, you couldn't possibly surmise that Harry wanted to bask in the reflected glory of his family by requesting the half in, half out arrangement due to imperceptiveness issues, to put it kindly. (Hey! You have something in common with your hero.)

He very much wanted to remain on his terms so he could continue to suck on the Royal teat. The freedom narrative only began when the Queen gave him a firm NO.

Harry was perfectly content to remain in a "No love. Just pomp & circumstance." environment and market his association with them for cash on the side, conflicts of interest be damned.

by Anonymousreply 88March 15, 2023 6:17 PM

^Charles has the most terrifying dragon in Westros.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 89March 15, 2023 10:18 PM

They were mocked again on Gutfeld tonight. The audience started clapping!

by Anonymousreply 90March 16, 2023 4:37 AM

If I were the Prince and Princess of Wales -I would either limit/closely supervise any interaction between their children with the Sussex children or not allow it . The Sussex parents would not be above lying about them and saying they made racist or bullying comments to Archie or Lilibet . Sad for the cousins not knowing each other, but the Sussex parents have no concept of truth or decency .

by Anonymousreply 91March 16, 2023 5:17 PM

Gutfield? R90 what on Earth were you doing watching that awful lying hack? What's it for a paper you're writing on unattractive white-wing cunts?

Or is it that you don't have any discernment?

by Anonymousreply 92March 16, 2023 5:26 PM

[quote]but the Sussex parents have no concept of truth or decency.

Well, it seems it is a BRF trait.

by Anonymousreply 93March 16, 2023 5:27 PM

It's more of a Harkle trait.

by Anonymousreply 94March 16, 2023 5:34 PM

Damn, Camilla @R9! Bitch, you are too fucking old to not remember what a fucking HATPIN is.

by Anonymousreply 95March 16, 2023 5:51 PM

I doubt if many, if any, members of the Royal Family read "The Guardian," but the paper has a great feature worth reading each weekend -- "Dining Across The Divide." It brings together over a meal two people from opposite political views. They dis cuss a range of issues. Last week brought together a middle-aged man who's always voted Labour and a 21 year old man leaning left but tired of politics as usual. On the topic of the monarchy the older guy gave a very telling remark:

[quote]But where there’s silliness – certainly on the part of Harry – if it’s going to break down, they’re not worth the money we give them, no.

Most in Britain see his bestseller as little more than an exercise in self-pity, which might spell the ruin for the lot of them!

by Anonymousreply 96March 16, 2023 10:50 PM

R96 Bonnie Wrong. They read the Guardian. They read them all. The tabs are laid out every morning for the Windsors to read at breakfast. They eagerly devour them like the hyenas they are. Ironical that in the States print media is moribund but in UK royals and hoi polloi can't get enough of so called print "newspapers". BRF and Fleet St. are in a noxious symbiotic relationship. Each needs the other to survive.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 97March 16, 2023 11:56 PM

This is the kind of laughable lunacy that Derangers eagerly put money in Murdoch's pocket for.....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 98March 17, 2023 12:03 AM

r97 Newspaper circulation has massively declined in the UK over the past 25 years-What on earth are you talking about?You are making a threadbare weak argument by not only joining up the wrong dots but joining up non existent dots!

by Anonymousreply 99March 17, 2023 1:37 AM

[quote]They were mocked again on Gutfeld tonight. The audience started clapping!

Meanwhile, idiot Colbert is promoting them and Harry's book.

by Anonymousreply 100March 17, 2023 1:45 AM

R99 Massive decline like your bilious YouTube channel . Now go clean under your foreskin Georgie.

by Anonymousreply 101March 17, 2023 1:50 AM

r101 My God you are pathetic and childish.I am from Liverpool and many decades younger than Lady C.Grow up.

by Anonymousreply 102March 17, 2023 1:54 AM

R102 Liverpool. That explains a lot.

by Anonymousreply 103March 17, 2023 1:57 AM

Wait, so "Lady" Colin Campbell has foreskin on his cock?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104March 17, 2023 1:58 AM

I am also many decades younger then Lady Colin Campbell.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105March 17, 2023 2:06 AM

R100 Colbert hates the Brits. He's a professional Irishman with a professional Irishman's chip on his shoulder. He's one of those people who think the Irish were actually slaves. Just like the Africans!

by Anonymousreply 106March 17, 2023 2:11 AM

This is a really really stupid thread and not remotely funny or witty.

by Anonymousreply 107March 17, 2023 2:14 AM

r103 Pick your lane and pick your argument-I am either the very posh Lady Colin Campbell or I am from Liverpool and that makes me an undesirable in some way that explains a lot.Both lines of attack on the same person are not credible.You have a mouth that belongs in the sewer.

by Anonymousreply 108March 17, 2023 2:15 AM

Well, whoever wants to socialize with Harry and Meghan can invite them to a polo game or backyard pool party, and see what happens.

As we now know, they are happy to be long term houseguests and will be happy to eat your magic mushrooms and chat with your wastebins. They’ll critique your bed linens and broadcast the cut-or-uncut status of your cock. They’ll publish your emails and call you names. Your dog may wind up with two broken legs, and Harry may lose control of his bladder.

by Anonymousreply 109March 17, 2023 2:26 AM

Speaking of people who don't want to socialize with the Sussexes... The entire Academy - especially "Uncle Elton" and his guests.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110March 17, 2023 2:30 AM

r100, there is no downside to befriending Prince Harry.

The Duke and Duchess of Windsor were greatly in demand around the world after the abdication and exile.

Just like his mother after the divorce from King Tampax.

by Anonymousreply 111March 17, 2023 2:35 AM

R97, there's "The Daily Mail," and then there's "The Guardian" or "The Telegraph."

It's like comparing "The National Enquirer" to "The New York Times" or the "Wall Street Journal."

There is no "noxious symbiotic relationship" between "The Guardian" and any member of the British Royal Family, unless that person desires the end of the monarchy -- in short, is a closet republican.

"The Guardian," by and large, ignores the goings-on of the Windsors, except for actual newsworthy stories, to write about the Crown's vast wealth, its tax-dodging ways, Charles' spider memos, or calling for the monarchy's abolition.

by Anonymousreply 112March 17, 2023 2:37 AM

[quote]The Duke and Duchess of Windsor were greatly in demand around the world after the abdication and exile.

Yup. By all the best people.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113March 17, 2023 2:45 AM

R108 Lady Scouser's todger has spoken.

by Anonymousreply 114March 17, 2023 3:18 AM

We DECLINED the invitation!!!

by Anonymousreply 115March 17, 2023 3:23 AM

Like the Trumps of Mar A Largo the Windsors of Buck House live in their own totally delusional world. The armies of courtiers,flunkies and hangers on The Wasp, The Bee, The Fly have squeezed the toothpaste of sycophantic fairytales onto Charlie's tooth brush for the 74 years of his useless existence. Yet it's the Sussexes who are in some Hollywood California American unreal world? Positively Trumpian projection. Norma Desmond was a rank amateur compared to Charlie. His Majesty is ready for his close up. The bill is in the post.

by Anonymousreply 116March 17, 2023 3:38 AM

Oh hi Meg! Still waiting for all of those A-list projects with A-list directors?

by Anonymousreply 117March 17, 2023 3:41 AM

R108 Apoligies SurvivingScouser. Perhaps I was mistaken. Only a frau from Liverpool would think George Zaide "posh".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118March 17, 2023 4:04 AM

Wow! Zing, R118! Your posts, especially the monikers, are so clever, they make me think of the great satirical authors' wit and incisive observations. I especially like the super-clever "Cowmilla" and "Horsemilla!"

You're such an imaginative wordsmith, you should consider submittong your portfolio of satirical works to Private Eye or the Onion. I hear they are always on the lookout for juvenile talent.

by Anonymousreply 119March 17, 2023 4:25 AM

R86, I doubt Edward Young or Simon Case worked against the royals, or leaked to the press. Clive Alderton may have, to make Charles look better.

by Anonymousreply 120March 17, 2023 4:36 AM

Where have all the self-deluded Lipstick Alley refugees scurried to?

by Anonymousreply 121March 17, 2023 6:32 AM

R111 I assume you mean Hitler? The Duke and Duchess of Windsor seemed to be “in demand” by the Nazis.

“The Duchess was a complicated person, cold, mean-spirited, a bully and a sadist,” observed Dr Gaea Leinhardt, stepdaughter of Wallis’ ghost writer, Cleveland Amory. “My parents found the Duke not very bright, a wimp, and basically a very sad man. “

Sound familiar?

by Anonymousreply 122March 17, 2023 6:43 AM

R122 Sure does.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123March 17, 2023 5:00 PM

Not sure why we should care, but Madame Oprah has declared that the Harkles should "do what they feel is best for them and for their family" when asked by friend Gayle King whether the couple should attend King Charles III’s coronation.

by Anonymousreply 124March 17, 2023 5:44 PM

Yes. It’s so challenging to get the Harkles to think of themselves first.

by Anonymousreply 125March 17, 2023 6:21 PM

Wait, since Oprah has never been married, should she be called Mademoiselle?

by Anonymousreply 126March 17, 2023 6:31 PM


by Anonymousreply 127March 17, 2023 7:13 PM

The upside of the Sussexes “befriending” you is that it’s confirmation that you’re more important than they are. If you’re thirsty as fuck, they’ll collaborate and share some tabloid space with you (your name in bold!).

The “downside” of the Sussexes “befriending” you is that they will throw you under the bus at the drop of a hat. They will use you for everything you have: private jet, private club membership, whatever useful connections you have, your cock/pussy, paid gossip item, free lodging, drugs, dinner (you think either one of them has ever reached for the check when the waiter places it on the table?). They’ll air your dirty laundry to make a buck. They’ll make sure they’re papped with you whether you like it or not. And when they can’t use you for anything else, you’re flushed down the toilet.

And if you’re hoping to get connected to the actual royals, you can forget it, hahaha.

by Anonymousreply 128March 17, 2023 7:42 PM

R111 They were in demand by cafe society. They had, however, lost the sheen that attaches itself to the Real Thing. And that's the mistake the Sussexes made: they think Oprah and receiving the Crowned Heads of Europe draped in historic jewels are mutually inclusive. They aren't.

It was exactly the endless rounds of parties, cruises, galas, races, et al., that cheapened the Windsors to the symbols of empty wealth that clung to them.

It was Edward's successor and his wife who led the country through WWII and who ended up on balconies waving to cheering crowds.

Ain't nuthin' like the real thing, baby . . ..

Harry is a moron and clearly mentally ill. His wife is a shallow, hard-arsed, status obsessed bitch.

They should have stayed behind the protective screen of noblesse oblige, where no one could see it.

by Anonymousreply 129March 17, 2023 7:42 PM

When this is all over, that wedding day will go down as one of the most bizarre spectacles in royal history.

by Anonymousreply 130March 17, 2023 7:44 PM

^ Think about it, Oprah, trussed up in that nude dress, strutting through the grounds of Windsor Castle like she owned the place, with neither the dignity or common sense to be embarrassed she was attending the wedding of two people she barely knew. The whole lot of them. The whole thing. What an exercise.

by Anonymousreply 131March 17, 2023 7:46 PM

rt130, the wedding day of the fake marriage of The Duke and Duchess of Cornhole?

by Anonymousreply 132March 17, 2023 8:40 PM

R132, I don't even know what that means, but I know where you're from. Go back there and drink Pepsi with the rest of them.

by Anonymousreply 133March 17, 2023 8:46 PM

r133, THIS wedding.

Love Harry giving the side eye.

Prince Charles and the Duchess Of Cornwall attend the Service of Prayer and Dedication following their CIVIL marriage on April 9, 2005.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 134March 17, 2023 9:09 PM

Well, R134, if their marriage isn't legal, you've just invalidated a significant number of other marriages as well.

You seem like so much fun for someone so intelligent!

by Anonymousreply 135March 17, 2023 9:35 PM

Gad you are a cunt. It is a legal wedding for the Defender of the faith when his adulterous wife's husband is still living.

Civil legal. Jesus weeps.

by Anonymousreply 136March 17, 2023 11:26 PM

I thought he was the "Defender of the Faiths" now?

by Anonymousreply 137March 17, 2023 11:43 PM

Only if he changes the language of the oath during the installation of the crown.

by Anonymousreply 138March 18, 2023 12:00 AM

He's Defender of The Taints.

by Anonymousreply 139March 18, 2023 1:09 AM

[quote]The Harkles seem to attract some genuinely mentally ill online stans.

Said without a trace of irony.

by Anonymousreply 140March 18, 2023 1:15 AM
by Anonymousreply 141March 18, 2023 1:23 AM

Apparently the Sussexes want to be included on the balcony for the Coronation- with all the people and the establishment that mistreated them! God they are making fools out of their sugars and supporters.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142March 18, 2023 1:52 AM

[quote] Apparently the Sussexes want to be included on the balcony for the Coronation

Go big or go home!

by Anonymousreply 143March 18, 2023 1:57 AM

Ideally the latter.

WTF is wrong with those two? They are a couple of head cases.

by Anonymousreply 144March 18, 2023 1:59 AM

Gotta admit that they have balls to demand anything.

by Anonymousreply 145March 18, 2023 2:24 AM

Whether you like her or not, Queen Mary certainly looked majestic with all of her tiaras and jewels.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 146March 18, 2023 3:48 PM

There’s no such thing as simply accepting an invitation. It requires negotiation. Tyler Perry would only attend Lilibet’s baptism if it was held in the US. He wasn’t taking his ass to England. (He probably doesn’t have a passport.)

Queen Elizabeth couldn’t suggest that Meghan wear a hat, but Queen Tyler could tell her where to baptize her chirren.

by Anonymousreply 147March 18, 2023 3:59 PM

Maybe his jet doesn't have the range to cross the Atlantic?

by Anonymousreply 148March 18, 2023 5:06 PM

By appointment to His Majesty limited Wedgewood 12 cup boxed set is released! Get out your credit card Hyacinth!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 149March 18, 2023 5:10 PM

Her acting certainly didn't.

by Anonymousreply 150March 18, 2023 5:12 PM

^ It's one's charge plate dear.

by Anonymousreply 151March 18, 2023 5:20 PM

His jet goes from Atlanta to LA, so I’m guessing it would reach England. I think he’s intimidated, honestly. And no shame, I would be, too.

by Anonymousreply 152March 18, 2023 5:33 PM

The mug at r149 is funny.

Yeah, after calling the RF racist, he might not feel too comfortable.

by Anonymousreply 153March 18, 2023 6:15 PM

Nobody outside the US has a clue who Tyler Perry is. Like with Oprah, US TV people with few exceptions - like the Friends cast - are unknown outside the US.

I'm an American and I have no fucking clue who Tyler Perry is. All I know is he dresses in drag to play some old black woman in TV shows I've never seen.

by Anonymousreply 154March 18, 2023 6:39 PM

Oh is that who he is? LOL. They just keep getting classier. Definite A list.

by Anonymousreply 155March 18, 2023 6:44 PM

Deranger Thread Fumigant

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156March 18, 2023 7:10 PM

^ Is that little Archie?

by Anonymousreply 157March 18, 2023 7:10 PM

It's Mother's Day across the pond. Here is Charles and Camilla's post.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158March 19, 2023 12:48 PM

William and Catherine's post.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159March 19, 2023 12:49 PM

[quote] William and Catherine's post.

Charles clearly loved his mother.

Obviously, William forgot he ever had one.

Fucking cunt.

by Anonymousreply 160March 19, 2023 1:07 PM

^ The Windsors certainly need to move to higher ground.

by Anonymousreply 161March 19, 2023 1:50 PM

R160 - Not dwelling in the past and moving forward is much healthier for your well being than always thinking about your loss.

by Anonymousreply 162March 19, 2023 2:33 PM

R162 I'm bloody well jealous.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 163March 19, 2023 3:26 PM

While Harry would like to claim Diana as his and his alone (including tripe about how she is watching his (only his?) life), it's plain that

(1) William was her favorite

(2) Diana would be horrified at Harry's attack on the RF

(3) At the time of her death, after being cast as confidant by his mother, William at 15 was smart enough and old enough to begin pulling away and to start to have a much clearer, accurate picture of his mother. He could still love her, but was probably much more aware of her less than admirable qualities.

(4) After Diana's death William got in touch with those who knew Diana best to learn who his mother really was. Rather than the facade she produced for public consumption.

(5) Diana would have sent Markle packing as soon as she appeared on the scene. (Being a manipulator herself, Diana would have nosed out the scamming Markle and given her no help at all).

Harry's 12 year old self remains as does the image of his mother as she appeared to him at that time.

by Anonymousreply 164March 19, 2023 3:48 PM

Re. point 2, I don't think horrified given she'd done her fair share of it, but she wouldn't approve - it's damaging William. Re point 5, agree 100%.

But I argue if Diana was alive, Harry wouldn't be the man he is now. Probably still a bit of a loser but not vulnerable to the influences and impulses that have made him the figure he has become. This is all because his mother died too young (in both cases) and he wasn't supported (or managed) properly after the fact. I mean he's still a spoiled baby, probably, but the vengefulness would have been less pronounced if it existed at all.

What's interesting is what kind of man William would have become, had his mother lived.

by Anonymousreply 165March 19, 2023 5:44 PM

Do keep up with the times r92.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 166March 20, 2023 5:48 AM

R156 etc stop trying to make “deranger” happen - it’s not going to happen. Better to focus on choosing a nationality and sticking to it. English? American? You’ve claimed both on various BRF threads lately.

The one thing common to both is that you are nuts and curiously invested, even more than the usual BRF thread loon. Hundred of replies to yourself and others! You’re certainly prolific, so there’s that, I guess.

by Anonymousreply 167March 20, 2023 6:30 AM

You’d have to be a special kind of stupid to think that Camilla was the only or even main reason Diana’s marriage failed.

She and Chuck were so ill-suited, divorce or a miserable coexistence were the only possible outcomes.

by Anonymousreply 168March 21, 2023 11:41 AM

If H&M actually attend that shit show they are nothing but gluttons for punishment. Why on earth would they be dumb enough to think they'd be treated as anything but pariahs? And why on earth would they willingly put themselves into that position?

Harry needs to make up his mind. Either forget that bunch back home, other than for once in a while private visits, or get your ass back to merry old England and resume what you claim is your birthright whole hog. You can not have your cake and eat it too.

by Anonymousreply 169March 21, 2023 11:47 AM

There’s no socializing with someone like Meghan. Every interaction is transactional and self-promoting. And if you can’t be useful, she’ll not spend a precious breath on you.

And what can she do for anyone? Introduce them to an exiled prince? Get them an audience with Oprah?

by Anonymousreply 170March 21, 2023 2:39 PM

I wonder what their private social lives are like. After all, this, you'd think pretty empty... just the kind of people who'd put up with the kind of people they are. Surely none of the A list wants anything to do with them?

by Anonymousreply 171March 21, 2023 3:16 PM

You have to be a special kind of evil cunt R168 to think Camilla is not an evil cunt.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172March 21, 2023 3:22 PM

I don't think they have any friends. Even in the fakeumentery she had to have employees pose as "friends".

by Anonymousreply 173March 21, 2023 3:45 PM

I agree with you, R169.

They would just be setting themselves up for humiliation (again) if they attended the coronation.

The best thing they can do is stay away. Shun the BRF completely, and live separate lives.

I hate to say it, but that bridge is totally burned.

William is such an angry and petty CUNT, that there's no way he could ever man up and forgive Harry for these perceived slights. William is an angry and petulant child, and he lacks the skills to be an adult.

Harry needs to realize this, and just move on. Focus on his family.

by Anonymousreply 174March 21, 2023 3:51 PM

R174, you made some sense until the rubbish about William. Anger, childish, petulance, lacking adult skills... that's not William, that's your boy.

But we agree, they should stay away, maintain a dignified silence and live separate lives.

by Anonymousreply 175March 21, 2023 4:10 PM

Yep r175. That's definitely Harry and his gutter heaux.

by Anonymousreply 176March 21, 2023 4:27 PM

[quote]If H&M actually attend that shit show they are nothing but gluttons for punishment.

There is no way in hell that these two lying, dishonorable, money-grubbing grifters in Montecito will miss attending the coronation. Their entire existence and relevancy depends on being royal adjacent. They crave the attention while lying about their precious privacy. They will not miss being in coronation photographs that will last an eternity. This whole, stupid cat-and-mouse game about whether or not they will attend is pure, contrived bullshit. They will crawl over broken glass if necessary to be there. But no, they will not be on the balcony--the big fat, jizz, spray-me-with-cum money shot that they want the most.

by Anonymousreply 177March 21, 2023 4:34 PM

I agree, they're coming. Someone is revelling in the speculation. Soulless, there's opportunity in the waiting game and then the round of complaints about how terribly they were treated. I can't figure out if they don't understand consequence or if their lives are so empty this media game provides some meaning. Dreadful people.

by Anonymousreply 178March 21, 2023 5:11 PM

I [italic]really[/italic] hope they attend the Coronation. DL will be fun while dissecting Mr and Mrs Markle's inevitable shitshow.

by Anonymousreply 179March 22, 2023 11:57 AM

[quote] I really hope they attend the Coronation. DL will be fun while dissecting Mr and Mrs Markle's inevitable shitshow.

Their favorability rating actually went up when they visited the UK for the Queen's funeral.

Mainly because they kept a very low profile and did everything they were told.

Harry and Meghan were very well behaved the entire time.

by Anonymousreply 180March 22, 2023 12:06 PM

Agreed that she would crawl over shattered glass in order to be at that coronation.

He might be wavering out of embarrassment, but she has no such scruples and IS GOING.

So they both are going, no matter what.

by Anonymousreply 181March 22, 2023 12:15 PM

R168 Even the Archbishop of Canterbury said in his memoirs that he was appalled at how ill-suited they were when they made their pre-marriage visits to him.

It takes two to tango, as the old saying has it. That marriage was in trouble by the time the honeymoon was over.

by Anonymousreply 182March 22, 2023 1:28 PM

[quote] Even the Archbishop of Canterbury said in his memoirs that he was appalled at how ill-suited they were when they made their pre-marriage visits to him.

[quote] That marriage was in trouble by the time the honeymoon was over.

Harry knew that he wanted to marry Meghan, and vice-versa.

William never wanted to marry Kate, and that's why they broke up. She felt the relationship was going nowhere.

But Waity Katie waited around for the BIG PRIZE, and she got it.

She couldn't care less about William. She just wanted to be Queen one day. And William needed a wife.

So it worked out for both of them, even though they don't really like each other.

Which is why she looks the other way, when William sleeps with Rose Hanbury.

So go fuck yourself, R182.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 183March 22, 2023 1:34 PM

You don't know that to be true, R183, and that you insist upon it so adamantly tells thinking people all they need to know. Pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 184March 22, 2023 1:43 PM

[quote] She and Chuck were so ill-suited, divorce or a miserable coexistence were the only possible outcomes.

Seriously. That interview where Charles said, “whatever love means” was very awkward. He was obviously unenthusiastic and Diana was clearly a complete mismatch for him. Red flags everywhere. But everyone, including myself, loved her. Superficially speaking. She was so lovely to look at. Just the right amount of pretty for a royal and she wore clothes beautifully. Those of us who were fans wanted to believe they would work.

by Anonymousreply 185March 22, 2023 1:44 PM

At the time, the only people who might have seen red flags were true insiders. The rest of us saw what we wanted to see.

by Anonymousreply 186March 22, 2023 1:50 PM

The Archbishop is jealous of me, and is also a racist!!!

by Anonymousreply 187March 22, 2023 2:37 PM

R182 is talking about the Archbishop's feelings about Charles and Diana, not Harry and Meghan

by Anonymousreply 188March 22, 2023 2:44 PM

The Sussex stans like R183 are so fucking dumb. They can't even read and follow a conversation.

by Anonymousreply 189March 22, 2023 9:02 PM

I can't understand why people attack William or Kate with venom. They do their jobs, they don't act like jerks. The Californians... they're assholes... and they love it, I can see why you attack them. But William and Kate are by no reasonable standard equally bad. It's night and day.

by Anonymousreply 190March 22, 2023 9:09 PM

r189. what you say, Willis?

by Anonymousreply 191March 22, 2023 9:27 PM

They can't capitalize, either.

by Anonymousreply 192March 22, 2023 9:29 PM

Charles can't really force his family members to be entirely nice to Harry and Meghan--they can cut the Sussexes in all kinds of subtle ways. Of course, if they do, they'll just have it printed in the next memoir, but I bet some of them (Anne, the Prince and Princess of Wales) are already plotting things they can do to be cold.

by Anonymousreply 193March 22, 2023 9:32 PM

Hey William at R189 and R190.

How tight is Rose's pussy?

Does she suck cock better than Waity Katie?

Must be why you keep going back to your mistress.

I don't blame you. Kate is old and haggard.

Your cheating is well known all around the world!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 194March 22, 2023 10:11 PM

r192 ¿whothemotherfuckingcuntdoyouthinkyouare?

by Anonymousreply 195March 22, 2023 11:22 PM

Yes R183 the Waleses clearly cannot stand each other.

You’re not a very good friend if you’re repeating Kate’s news that she cannot stand William - when did she tell you this?

By the way the woman who you are obsessed with is the Marchioness of Cholmondeley, not “Rose Hanbury”. But like all the Sussex Squad you can’t spell and are frightened of big words. It’s how you and your trash squaddies are so easily identified.

by Anonymousreply 196March 23, 2023 12:36 AM

R183 you’re a fucking idiot. R182 was referring to what a previous Archbishop of Canterbury said about Charles and Diana - nothing to do with Hazza and his whore.

by Anonymousreply 197March 23, 2023 12:42 AM

Another to easily identify the trash that is R183 / R194 is its liberal use of “cunt”, usually spelled as “CUNT!!!”.

Makes it so much easier for my judicious use of F&F. It’s quite effective.

by Anonymousreply 198March 23, 2023 12:51 AM

[quote]Charles clearly loved his mother.

[Quote]Obviously, William forgot he ever had one.

[Quote]Fucking cunt.

This is the first Mother's Day since Charles' mother died, so of course his post was about her. Obviously.

by Anonymousreply 199March 23, 2023 1:04 AM

Why are we still talking about these irrelevant 19th century curios?

by Anonymousreply 200March 23, 2023 1:53 AM

Why are you here, R200, if you’re not interested?

by Anonymousreply 201March 23, 2023 3:02 AM

R194 Meghan is having an episode.

by Anonymousreply 202March 23, 2023 7:59 AM

Meghan's invading diabetics always reflect so well on her. Really, the adoring and the unadorable are perfectly suited. Meghan would be so proud.

by Anonymousreply 203March 23, 2023 11:15 AM

"when they visited the UK for the Queen's funeral" - They didn't visit the UK for the Queen's funeral, r180, they were already in the country on one of their rare visits for their own promotional purposes, which did not involve meeting Harry's family or making an effort to visit his aged grandmother who was obviously in her final days and whom they were unlikely to ever see again.

by Anonymousreply 204March 23, 2023 11:24 AM

I don't know what this child did but William was getting a kick out of his antics.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 205March 23, 2023 2:07 PM

Downs... lovely, loving temperaments. That's the power of position. He responds with caring. That's the power of it. Example can move.

by Anonymousreply 206March 23, 2023 2:41 PM

Princess Margaret’s granddaughter Lady Margarita Armstrong Jones on the cover of Tatler.

I always thought that she was prettier than trout mouth Lady Amelia Windsor who gets all of the attention.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 207March 23, 2023 2:44 PM

^ Nothing remarkable.

by Anonymousreply 208March 23, 2023 2:45 PM

The Kate and William stans are having a meltdown on this thread!!!

They hate hearing about William the Cheater and Kate the Bulemic.

It ruins their narrative of the perfect, happy couple.

Clearly, the "Men in Gray" post on this thread.

But it doesn't work any more.

Not in this day and age of social media where the truth ALWAYS comes out.

William is an adulterer and Waity Katie is extremely unhappy and anorexic/bulemic.

by Anonymousreply 209March 23, 2023 10:16 PM

[quote] By the way the woman who you are obsessed with is the Marchioness of Cholmondeley, not “Rose Hanbury”.

Rose Hanbury IS the Marchioness of Cholmondeley.

No oen here--[bold]no one[/bold]--is required to refer to her by her formal title used in the Court Circular. You seem to be the same troll who keeps repeating that we have to call people by their titles, and we do [bold]not.[/bold]

by Anonymousreply 210March 23, 2023 10:20 PM

You forgot to link one of your usual trite, juvenile memes, r209. They always have more of an impact when repeated a dozen times.

by Anonymousreply 211March 23, 2023 10:23 PM

Brava, R210!

I'm so glad you told off that BRF cunt licking troll who INSISTS that we "respect" the BRF.

They can go fuck themselves.

by Anonymousreply 212March 23, 2023 10:23 PM

R209 Are the Waleses in the room with you, Dear? Are you being named a godparent to Black King Archie?

by Anonymousreply 213March 23, 2023 10:33 PM

r212, he keeps demanding that we use proper titles, and yet even THEY do not require that people refer to them by their proper titles. It's just OCD assholery that keeps prompting him to insist again and again and again.

by Anonymousreply 214March 23, 2023 10:40 PM

Actually R210, R212, R213 and R214 I was simply alluding to the fact that the demographic of the average Sussex Stan is of someone who was knocked up at 13 and 15 by different baby daddies so left school early and never learned to spell. Therefore “Hanbury” v’s “Cholmondeley”. But you knew that.

Lovely of you to defend them, though.

Over to you to call me a CUNT, or Hyacinth, or Deranger or the classic Klan Grannie - so clever.

by Anonymousreply 215March 23, 2023 10:50 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 216March 23, 2023 11:23 PM

R209 Jesus, please take your medication. Mania doesn’t look good on you.

by Anonymousreply 217March 24, 2023 12:55 AM

No they weren't r180. The exact opposite in fact.

by Anonymousreply 218March 24, 2023 4:28 AM

Interesting how R210 R212 R213 and R214 have gone quiet to my response - it’s almost as though they have nothing to say in reply, given that what I said was the truth.

Rock on Squaddies, you illiterate diabetic trash!

by Anonymousreply 219March 24, 2023 6:44 AM

They don't come here to engage. They're gangbangers. They come, they open fire, and then scurry back to the squalor they come from, hoping not to get caught. Nice to see the once and future in custody R209 get lined out. Scum here, scum everywhere.

by Anonymousreply 220March 24, 2023 12:27 PM

Phew! Need Deranger Thread Fumigant

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 221March 25, 2023 3:16 AM

Ahead of his Coronation on 6 May 23, His Majesty King Charles has bestowed a rare set of honours upon those who held important roles during the preparations & funeral of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 222March 25, 2023 4:01 PM

Harry at r221 is actually showing a select few kids up front and out of camera range his technique for rolling the tightest joint. The boy's got job skills he can share in the inner city because, as Sussex fans are well aware, "sharing is service." Get those nimble little fingers working for the local dealer!

by Anonymousreply 223March 25, 2023 4:21 PM

r222, so he isn't fucking over the pallbearers.

by Anonymousreply 224March 25, 2023 6:34 PM

R222 Hopefully they'll be back to work soon.

by Anonymousreply 225March 25, 2023 6:45 PM

Toll Free R223

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 226March 25, 2023 7:22 PM

Just seat the SouthParkles in the Siberia section of the Abbey. Nobody wants to talk to them and nobody has to talk to them. If they're dumb and hypocritical enough to show up, they deserve a frostbite reception and general audience seating.

No socializing, no little Merchie and Invisibet present at the coronation, no balcony appearance for the Duke and Duchess of PRIVACY. Give them nothing as they desperately try to grasp at anything royal.

by Anonymousreply 227March 25, 2023 7:39 PM

The Maul claiming they are negotiating to be on the balcony.

I just don't see how that happens. If that happens, what is the point of it all? Do they stand for anything? Does anything matter any more?

by Anonymousreply 228March 25, 2023 10:38 PM

I think Charles is rewarding those who have been loyal and hard-working, as evidenced in r222. He’s in that mode right now, letting folks know that their loyalty is appreciated, at the start of his reign.

This also sends a message to those who have rendered themselves useless and disloyal. I don’t think the king is rewarding Harry and Meghan OR the Yorks.

by Anonymousreply 229March 25, 2023 11:36 PM

If he lets them on the balcony after the Royalty is Evil Tour, he's as stupid as his mother always covering for Andrew.

And I wonder how the Squad will excuse their hypocrisy for WANTING to be on the balcony

by Anonymousreply 230March 26, 2023 2:40 AM

^ It's all about the CAPS Dee.

by Anonymousreply 231March 26, 2023 3:23 AM

It's glaringly obvious that the "grey men" are running scared. They're sending Mr Potato Head off to Polish gay bars and Stepford Wife Katie to read robo speeches to half a dozen non entities. This is the best the decrepit Windsor's can come up with?

by Anonymousreply 232March 26, 2023 3:38 AM

Rofl R232!


by Anonymousreply 233March 26, 2023 3:40 AM

R232 Perhaps the Peg Of Wales can get a gig in a Polish gay bar.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 234March 26, 2023 6:25 AM

Colbert has become a smug starfucker, hope he gets canceled.

by Anonymousreply 235March 26, 2023 6:49 AM

R232 you are aware you are posting on the DL a site for gay men? You aren't on Lipstick Alley here, Dawakanda. Take your homophobia back to your sistahs.

by Anonymousreply 236March 26, 2023 7:05 AM

It's pointless to cite stories in the tabloids, because the tabloids make it up knowing that as long as they say "it is reported that" or play the tired old "a palace insider said" . . .

No Palace insider would tell the press anything of the kind. These are all pot-stirring stories that no one will be held accountable for running, because otherwise the Palace would be doing nothing else from dawn to dusk.

No one knows what's going on behind the scenes. But I think it's safe to suppose that Charles knows only too well that putting the Sussexes on that balcony would generate a wave of boos that could be heard in outer space, and tacitly endorse everything the Sussexes have done to undermine the King and William for the last three years. I doubt William and Kate would even set foot on the balcony if Charles tried it on- but why the hell would he want to?! He's got enough problems.

Because, if the Sussexes got on, then Andrew, who also clearly isn't going to be on that balcony, would be quite justified in heading to France to raise an army to depose his brother. The insult would be beyond bearing.

And, for further evidence that the story is total bollocks - the royal website was just updated: the Sussex's web pages were moved to below the rest of the working royals, despite outranking them in the line of succession.

If you think that was an Act of God, think again. In small, incremental ways, Charles is carefully making himself clear: no more rent-free Frogmore Cottage near the Walse family because the Wales won't stand for it; Sussex web pages moved to the back of the line; Counsellors of State added to the list so that the King can skip over Harry and Andrew when he travels; no appearance on the balcony; seating at the coronation as per their relevance to the future of the monarchy (i.e., none).

They got their kids' titles. That's all they're going to get.

Charles doesn't have his mother's "bonte" (a broad sense of good will - it was one of her well-known personality traits, and sometimes too much so, but there it is)

Charlese is known to be thin-skinned and peevish - especially where insults to his wife and his status are concerned. He's a very odd combination of an essentially Edwardian man with a veneer of modernity.

The Sussexes will not appear on the balcony, nor will Harry be wearing ermine robes or a coronet, as none of the other peers will be wearing them, either.

If you watch footage of the Queen's funeral, the first time God Save the King is played, Harry's face is a portrait of hate, and even for the sake of optics he barely mouths a few words.

In fact, I'd be surprised if any joint family photos in BP afterwards included the Sussexes.

If Harry and Meghan have the sense of goats, they'll politely decline. If they don't, they'll get the same treatment they did at the Jubilee: a seat in the second row, no role in the procession or ceremony, no balcony appearance, and no family photos.

by Anonymousreply 237March 26, 2023 1:09 PM

The UK tabloids used to invent royal stories - they also invent celebrity stories - to sell papers. Now they do it for clicks. They work on the schadenfreude principle: make their readers believe that all rich and famous people are more miserable than they are.

Meghan Markle's whole problem is she was never famous enough to be in the US tabs. If she had been, she'd have realized tabloids weren't her Suits publicists.

by Anonymousreply 238March 26, 2023 6:53 PM

Harry & Meghan need to stay away from the perverted Windsors. For the safety of their children. Mountbatten was King Charlies "inspiration and mentor." Tells you all you need to know about King Tampon and the pedos who idolize him.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 239March 26, 2023 7:30 PM

Foreplay in the British Royal Family.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 240March 26, 2023 7:33 PM

R239 should probably tell them to drop their titles and cut all contact then.

by Anonymousreply 241March 26, 2023 7:37 PM

Jeez, Harry and Meghan should probably stay home in California where it’s nice and safe. Why do they want to be sitting with all those dangerous perverts? And bringing their poor innocent children and exposing them to the poisonous BRF?

by Anonymousreply 242March 26, 2023 7:46 PM

R241 and your ilk : Have you no decency?

by Anonymousreply 243March 26, 2023 7:52 PM

R243 do you? If everyone who had a close relationship with a pedophile was guilty by association, most of the world would be a monster in your eyes.

But the question is, and your squaddies NEVER have an answer, if the Royal family is so rotten to the core, why are your faves SO desperate to hold onto their association?

by Anonymousreply 244March 26, 2023 7:56 PM

Diana's niece, Lady Amelia Spencer, was recently married in South Africa. Daddy Earl Spencer did not attend.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 245March 26, 2023 8:04 PM

I don't know who you are talking to R244 or what a squaddie is but it may be that a lot of these stories are made up to hook gullible old ladies like you? No one knows what's going on behind the scenes.

by Anonymousreply 246March 26, 2023 8:09 PM

R244 Do CAPS make up for having absolutely no morals?

by Anonymousreply 247March 26, 2023 8:10 PM

Someone imagined what King Charles III would look like at his Coronation in May. Well, I heard he was wearing a uniform not old fashioned breeches.

by Anonymousreply 248March 26, 2023 8:10 PM

^ Sorry here's the portrait.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 249March 26, 2023 8:11 PM

R248 You heard right luv. Eaiser to shag the page boys.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 250March 26, 2023 8:13 PM

R246 hun, I'm not a little old lady. And how is it fake stories when they literally use royal titles on everything they do.

If I had escaped a horrible toxic environment, as you and they claim his family is...I'd probably stop reminding people of my connection to them. But hey, that's just me.

by Anonymousreply 251March 26, 2023 8:15 PM

R244 Thinks "most of the world has close relationships with pedophiles". Tells you all need to know about her and her royalist perves

by Anonymousreply 252March 26, 2023 8:16 PM

I claim? I never said any such thing R251. I'm merely saying quit believing everything in gossip rags. Those worthless pieces of shit that's printed for fangurls full of half truths and innuendo.

by Anonymousreply 253March 26, 2023 8:19 PM

R251 - Granny revealed. They always claim people said things they didnt like trolls always do.

by Anonymousreply 254March 26, 2023 8:21 PM

King Pedo and another one of his "mentors"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 255March 26, 2023 8:22 PM

A lot of what we get is deliberately planted in the tabloids by Harry and Meghan.

This "wanting to be part of the family on this important balcony occasion" bullshit was a pure Sussex plant. Fuck them, they'll never be on that balcony again.

The late Queen arranged everything before she died. NO to Sussex participation in the Jubilee/Coronation. NO to Sussex participation on the balcony for the Jubilee/Coronation. No half-in and half-out fucked up "arrangement" for the Sussexes, the late Queen put a stop to that shit. No Andrew participating on the Jubilee/Coronation and no Andrew on the balcony. Andrew has to give up Royal Lodge and move into Frogmore "cottage" now. The late Queen was very wise and she knew the right way forward. No Sussexes, No Yorks. On the orders of the late Queen herself.

When does Omid Scoobydoo get SouthParkled, he's pushing out their "leaks" and planted stories but they're all failing miserably, when does Scoobydoo get the boot?

by Anonymousreply 256March 26, 2023 8:29 PM

Prince Nazi.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 257March 26, 2023 8:32 PM

Prince Naked Billiards

The naked shots have been scrubbed (I didn't see any anyway) but they can't scrub the headlines.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 258March 26, 2023 8:36 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 259March 26, 2023 8:39 PM

R257 Queen Elizabeth,Princess Margaret and The Queen Mum of the Saxe Coburg-Gotha Nazis😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 260March 26, 2023 9:09 PM

All over18 years of age shite for brains R258

by Anonymousreply 261March 26, 2023 9:10 PM

^ That's why I wasn't there.

by Anonymousreply 262March 26, 2023 9:11 PM

I wonder when Harry is going to get deported because he lied on his visa application about his drug use. Where will he go? Can't really go back to the UK. Burned his bridges there. Maybe Botswana? But will Meghan be happy where there are no paparazzi to call?

by Anonymousreply 263March 26, 2023 9:13 PM

Now I ask you Hyacinth ,does this look like the face of a depraved pedophile?

I'll wait.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 264March 26, 2023 9:13 PM

Why is Meghan Markle paying trolls to haunt the DL? Makes no sense. DL has always hated D list golddigging starlets. And she's no exception.

by Anonymousreply 265March 26, 2023 9:16 PM

R239 Makes perfect sense. Lord Mountbatten was Edward VIII /Duke of Windsor's closest mate. Edward was a small slightly built man. He was practically hairless. He shaved once a week. One of his doctors said he had small pre adolescent looking genitals and nude looked like a 12 yo boy at the age of 32. Snap is of Dickie and David sharing a pool on their world tour. Close as two peas in a pod. Explains a lot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 266March 26, 2023 9:33 PM

R265 Your meds are in the fridge Dee.

by Anonymousreply 267March 26, 2023 9:37 PM

R236 How does using the phrase "gay bar" on a gay website constitute "homophobia" you dotty Klan Granny?

by Anonymousreply 268March 26, 2023 9:58 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!