Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Royals "Don't Want to Socialize" with Sussexes at Coronation, Hope They'll Be "Seated in Iceland"

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have officially been invited to King Charles' upcoming coronation after a ton of speculation about whether the royals would include them on the guest list. In fact, the couples' rep released a statement confirming the news, simply saying "I can confirm The Duke has recently received email correspondence from His Majesty's office regarding the coronation. An immediate decision on whether The Duke and Duchess will attend will not be disclosed by us at this time."

While the Sussexes still haven't made said decision, there are rumors that they will be in attendance at the event—and sources tell the Daily Mail that the royals have no desire to socialize with them.

Per a friend of the royal family who spoke to the outlet, "They will be given the cold shoulder by very many relatives. One said to me, I hope they’ll be seated in Iceland. Many of the family just want nothing more to do with them. If they have to see them at the Coronation then so be it, but they do not want to socialize with them."

The Daily Mail also reports that Meghan and Harry will stay at Frogmore Cottage should they attend the coronation, despite the fact that they're being evicted from the property—something their rep also confirmed with a statement saying "We can confirm the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been requested to vacate their residence at Frogmore Cottage."

While the couples' lease on Frogmore Cottage runs out in March, apparently they've been allowed to extend it for just a few months to arrange the transportation of their belongings to California.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 545April 18, 2023 10:06 PM

Our pussies stink.

by Anonymousreply 1March 15, 2023 12:44 AM


by Anonymousreply 2March 15, 2023 12:44 AM

Why does William have so much hate for his brother? What? Because he married a black woman?? Princess Diana (RIP)must be rolling in her grave .

by Anonymousreply 3March 15, 2023 12:46 AM

Those BRF cunts are total CUNTS!

No wonder Meghan wanted to get away from them.

by Anonymousreply 4March 15, 2023 12:47 AM

OP which one of Charlies Angels is you?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5March 15, 2023 12:49 AM

They are treating the Sussexes just as they would have treated Diana. This is why I hope they act with dignity, attend the coronations of His Majesty and the Queen Adulterers, in any presence as directed, and as the RF departs behind closed doors, the Sussexes visit DIANA'S charities, drop some heavy coin, and leave for CA. Coronation day is the day Diana would have become queen.

Suck it, Rottweiler, there are STILL three people in the marriage.

by Anonymousreply 6March 15, 2023 12:53 AM

I can't wait to see Sophie glare at MM and hear the boos.

by Anonymousreply 7March 15, 2023 12:56 AM

Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh.

by Anonymousreply 8March 15, 2023 1:00 AM

Queen Cuntsort disses commonwealth dancers and leaves Charlie alone on the stoop. Is this rat bag deliberately trying to destroy the monarchy or did she just need a gin and tonic?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9March 15, 2023 1:06 AM

[quote] Why does William have so much hate for his brother?

Maybe because his brother sold his whole family’s privacy to Netflix and Bantam Books for a big bag of money.

I’d hate my brother if he did that too, and I certainly wouldn’t be keen on any more chats which could be twisted into material for the next edition of Diaries of a Ginger Whinger.

by Anonymousreply 10March 15, 2023 1:08 AM

R9 Who the bloody hell does this nasty old racist skank appeal to other then other old nasty racist skanks like R10?

by Anonymousreply 11March 15, 2023 1:17 AM

Royal Reporters have admitted that the brf leaked info on the Sussex and that most of the leaks came from Kensington Palace. So Williams crew. They can't whinge about Harry revealing private info if they are doing the same thing.

by Anonymousreply 12March 15, 2023 1:20 AM

It's got so bad for the BRF they have initiated a training program for Reporters who cover the BRF. They will be given training on how to cover Royal reporting. Journalists are supposed to be impartial not guided when reporting. The second issue is that the charity that is suppose to be impartially mentoring these reporters is run by Camillas friend. Her daughter attended the Piers/Clarkson lunch and her step daughter is married to the Blackamoor brooch Royals son. Impartial my ass. When journalists are told what, when and how to report its right out of the fascist playbook.

by Anonymousreply 13March 15, 2023 1:29 AM

Right! The Harkles wanted nothing to do with the BRF which is why they renounced their titles and didn't want titles for their kids! Oh, wait...

by Anonymousreply 14March 15, 2023 1:35 AM

R3 Willy is a 40 yo angry man baby like his Pa. In Spare Harry describes how Willy spent a week literally screaming and yelling at him because Harry got "permission " from the Queen to wear his beard at his wedding. Willy demanded that if he the Heir was forced to shave then the Spare should have to also. Willy went so far as to plan to get Harry pissed at his Batchelor party and forcible shave off his beard. WTF? This from a 36 yo man.Harry says his bro is compulsively competitive with him and his out of control rage is because he as the heir is so tightly controlled by the palace officials he hates. When he heard Harry was going to Africa on a wildlife conservation tour he pounded the table and said No! No! Africa is Mine Mine! Then comes the physical violence. Anyone checking anorexic Katie for bruises.? William is an angry violent control freak Just look at him. One day he will go off on camera and that will be the end of him. That's why he hates his own brother. Besides Diana loved Harry more.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15March 15, 2023 1:44 AM

Rubbish! This why William hates Harry..

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16March 15, 2023 1:47 AM

"They are treating the Sussexes just as they would have treated Diana"

Had Diana, Princess of Wales lived don't believe she would be treated horribly by BRF at either funeral of QEII and or coronation. Though both events would likely be awkward for Diana as a divorced former royal, it was made clear even after HM took away the HRH that Diana was still part of the royal family.

While Diana likely may have attended some private events surrounding the coronation such as balls or parties, you can hardly expect her to be invited to her ex-husband's coronation. More so since the adulteress CPB who is widely blamed for busting up the Waleses marriage is going to be crowned queen consort. It would have been like Catherine of Aragon attending the coronation of Anne Boleyn.

by Anonymousreply 17March 15, 2023 1:52 AM

Interesting at R9.

Those Maori people from New Zealand performed that as a tribute/honor to the King and Queen Consort.

They are subjects and part of the British Commonwealth, and it was a "gift" of sorts to the King and his wife.

The fact that Camilla completely disregarded that performance is so rude and crass, that I almost find it unbelievable she would behave that way.

by Anonymousreply 18March 15, 2023 1:53 AM

Camilla's 92yo mother in law could make time to pause and pay her respects. But then Elizabeth was a real Queen and not a drunken jacked up Side Piece.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19March 15, 2023 2:03 AM

You mean, it would have been uncomfortable for Diana to witness her ex-husband and his correspondent being crowned? A glory of Adulterers. There STILL would have been three in the marriage.

by Anonymousreply 20March 15, 2023 2:05 AM

r16, keep that picture handy when people ask what "beef curtains" are.

by Anonymousreply 21March 15, 2023 2:07 AM

Some Deranger Thread Fumigant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 22March 15, 2023 2:09 AM

William probably inherits his explosive violent temper from his great grand father George VI who was notorious for his apoplectic rages which sent his family, courtiers and servants running for cover.

by Anonymousreply 23March 15, 2023 2:13 AM

Too many deluded sugars here. Lol.

by Anonymousreply 24March 15, 2023 2:14 AM

William is jealous of Harry's todger.

by Anonymousreply 25March 15, 2023 2:16 AM

^ He bloody well should be.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26March 15, 2023 2:22 AM

Harry and Meghan should just stay in the US where they are beloved luminaries. Honored guests at the Oscars, center stage at the State of the Union, giving important speeches in the California legislature.

by Anonymousreply 27March 15, 2023 2:25 AM

[QUOTE]Had Diana, Princess of Wales lived don't believe she would be treated horribly by BRF at either funeral of QEII and or coronation.

I also don't think Diana would attend the coronation, but I don't think she'd be treated badly at all. Certainly not with William and Harry around. Who know by then, she may have led a quiet redeeming life. Even she understood the Panorama interview was a mistake.

by Anonymousreply 28March 15, 2023 2:30 AM

There would be no point in Diana attended KC3's coronation, she likely wouldn't have received an invitation but understood why and was ok with things.

Like to think Diana would have offered to mind any of Prince William's children (her grandchildren) if they weren't involved or otherwise attending the coronation.

by Anonymousreply 29March 15, 2023 2:38 AM

These are the evil old gits you lickspittles grovel to? Pathetic.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30March 15, 2023 2:49 AM

DL certainly is an authority on Queendom

by Anonymousreply 31March 15, 2023 2:51 AM

[quote] Archie and Lilibet 'not invited' to King Charles' coronation as Harry and Meghan 'set to be given cold shoulder'

Their parents Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will be invited, but will be "given the cold shoulder" by many relatives.

The couple have not been told whether their children, aged 3 and 1, will be included in the coronation, with one source saying that they are "very young".

The Sussexes have not confirmed whether they will be going to the royal event on May 6. The rift between Harry and the rest of the royal family after a series of explosive revelations in his book and Netflix documentary is still said to be painful.

Royal officials told Harry and Meghan that discussions could be held on whether Archie and Lilibet might be invited if they confirmed their own attendance at the coronation.

Options also include Harry going alone, or both of them staying away, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

But organisers painstakingly putting together plans for the event are working on the basis that they will attend.

Harry and Meghan may not be very popular with their family at the coronation and they will not be invited to take part in the official balcony appearance.

"They will be given the cold shoulder by very many relatives. One said to me, "I hope they'll be seated in Iceland," a friend of the royal family told the Mail.

The doubt over Archie and Lilibet's invitation is likely to further widen the rift between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

Prince William and Kate Middleton's children Prince George, 9, and Princess Charlotte, 7, are expected to go. Prince Louis, 5, is more of a doubt but still likely to be taken.

Meanwhile Camilla's teenage grandchildren are also expected to go. The Queen Consort had pushed for them to carry the canopy under which she would be anointed, but this plan was quashed.

Royal sources said it would be "wholly improper" to discuss Camilla's grandchildren attending but not some of the King's.

Charles himself was four when he attended his mother Queen Elizabeth's coronation, although he did not stay for the full three hours. Princess Anne was two and did not attend, although she was on the balcony for the official photographs later.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32March 15, 2023 2:52 AM

r20 Ask Julia Carling and a host of other women about what they think and feel about the topic of Diana and adultery. This deifying or making a saint out of Diana is incredibly regressive and immature.

by Anonymousreply 33March 15, 2023 2:56 AM

Why should Camilla give a shite?. She got what she schemed for for 30 years. She's looks like the cat he swallowed the canary.

by Anonymousreply 34March 15, 2023 2:56 AM

The cunt who swallowed the pidgeon

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35March 15, 2023 2:57 AM

R33 George isn't it time to powder your balls?

by Anonymousreply 36March 15, 2023 2:59 AM

There is no sense nor reason in packing up the Sussex sprogs and hauling them to UK for the coronation.

Their parents will have a very limited role (showing up, go where they are told to go, do what they are told to do and don't create a fuss), nor likely will be in UK very long anyway. Can't see either PH or MM high on anyone's guest list for various balls or parties being given in honor of event.

Bringing those children means also an entire encourage of child minders, supplies and so forth. Quite a lot of bother when their parents likely won't spend more than a few days in UK.

Finally the Markle woman won't have it because, as she has not let world forget, coronation day coincides with that of her son's birthday. To bring one or both sprogs would put any plans for a birthday party totally out. It would have to occur week or so before event or sometime afterward.

by Anonymousreply 37March 15, 2023 3:04 AM

R27 None of which they ever did but in your fetid imagination Dee.

by Anonymousreply 38March 15, 2023 3:06 AM

Harry should host his own coronation party in the UK, and get Elton John, Adele and Ed Sheeran to headline.

That would be fucking hilarious!!

It would be the party of the year, and completely take away from boring old William and Kate.

by Anonymousreply 39March 15, 2023 3:11 AM

Most of this stuff is made up by tabloids looking to sell their rags.

by Anonymousreply 40March 15, 2023 3:13 AM

Both brothers look like they have anger issues

by Anonymousreply 41March 15, 2023 3:25 AM

r36 Now you have indulged your moronic childish spite can you engage with the substance of my point? Why deify Diana? If other people are fair game for criticism so should she be-making such a central pivotal figure in this royal saga totally untouchable and above criticism is stupid and irrational.

by Anonymousreply 42March 15, 2023 3:50 AM

I think that Diana would decline the invitation in favor of waiting for one from Wills.

by Anonymousreply 43March 15, 2023 4:14 AM

I think Diana would be disgusted by the person that William has become.

by Anonymousreply 44March 15, 2023 4:16 AM

R42 SurvivingTrans We read your vile hatchet job on her George . Stick to your pathetic YouTube Channel and your Ruskie mail order "sons.".

by Anonymousreply 45March 15, 2023 4:17 AM

Diana would slap Harry across the face for what he's done.

by Anonymousreply 46March 15, 2023 4:17 AM

^ Sure Dee

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 47March 15, 2023 4:22 AM

Recall at one point Diana was thinking of moving to freedom in California. Glad her son and his wife fulfilled her dream for their family exiting the toxic waxworks that is the the BRF.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 48March 15, 2023 4:28 AM

Wait so now we are against the BRF and supportive of Harry? I can’t keep track.

Seriously it’s a cold and dysfunctional family bizarrely run by courtiers who seem to maintain consistency even when one of them quits

by Anonymousreply 49March 15, 2023 4:34 AM

r48 Yet still passionately cling to BRF titles for them and their children so not really free and unshackled at all from the so called toxic royal family.

Yet another opportunity to remind people they asked for half in half out .The narrative of wanting to break free and run to escape their pain was introduced latter on.

by Anonymousreply 50March 15, 2023 4:37 AM

The lying, grifting, hypocritical (“the RF are racists, yet we want their TITLES!”) South Parkles are global laughingstocks.

If they are so brazen as to attend the coronation, get out the popcorn and wine.

by Anonymousreply 51March 15, 2023 4:39 AM

r49 I think its more the case that they are using some of the proceeds of Spare to employ some bots and pretend fans to troll again, Ironic given their phoney stance on misinformation.

by Anonymousreply 52March 15, 2023 4:40 AM

Harry and the cretin he married are huge laughingstocks here in the U.S. they are constantly mocked. People are laughing at their pretentious for the surrogate children. It's just comical. They're going broke with that house and are getting desperate.

by Anonymousreply 53March 15, 2023 4:41 AM

Will hates Harry because Harry is an asshole. Harry seemed like a decent likable guy for many years. Granted, we didn't actually know him. But who knew that Harry wasn't just an asshole, but turned out to be a person who is a lying, grifting narcissist who cannot be trusted and wallows in victimhood while throwing his family under the bus. Who knew that Harry is just rather a rotten person?

William, Kate and the rest of them are not perfect, but they didn't bank their livelihood on being lying grifters. Charles and Camilla are no prizes. They set out to destroy Diana's marriage before it even began. But as wrong as that was, it was a marital dispute. This bullshit that Harry and Markle have pulled is unforgiveable.

The entire UK threw these grifting Markles a $38 million wedding. The country loved both of them. No one started hating them until they became lying, mercenary thugs. And it has NOTHING to do with Markle being of mixed race.

Markle is still talking about "Kate made me cry." Don't ever forget that a grown woman is still bitching about crying over a child's bridesmaid dress from almost five years ago. This is no reason to try and destroy the monarchy even if Markle hated it.

There was one journalist who wrote about Markle being "straight outa Compton." And it was an American journalist--not a British journalist. Markle plays the victim and lies--and so does her asshole husband.

by Anonymousreply 54March 15, 2023 4:46 AM

There is no way in hell that the Markles will miss the coronation. They can bitch all they want about "not knowing if they will attend." Yeah, right.

These two lying, evil, money-grubbing, narcissists wouldn't miss the coronation and all the worldwide publicity that will come as a result ever, never, ever, never. Unfortunately, they will be there despite this deceitful, threatening, cat-and-mouse game they're trying to play. Markle NEVER misses a camera pointed her way. And Harry the put-upon, lying victim will do what she tells him to do. They have 16 bathrooms to pay for in Montecito. And when you are Meghan Markle there is never enough money no matter what you have to do to get it.

by Anonymousreply 55March 15, 2023 4:56 AM

R50 SurvivingTrans the same dotty gargoyles(like you George) who hated his mum hate Harry and for the same reasons. Different lipstick same ugly pig. You fool no one. Fortunately you're dying off. Now go tape your todger it's flapping.

by Anonymousreply 56March 15, 2023 4:56 AM

Laughable that the Derangers who rant here have never bothered to read Spare. Like the Trumpers who take it as "fact" the election was stolen. Same delusional mind set.Derangers and Deplorables tick off all the same boxes. Cultist gotta cult in Murica or UK.

by Anonymousreply 57March 15, 2023 5:02 AM

All jokes & snark aside? I’m am TRULY impressed AF, that Harry got the fuck away from this profoundly dysfunctional family.

I understand that there are MANY lackeys here, who carry water for the British Royal Family, obviously rooted in their own self interests.

The above being stated, Harry is up against some of the MOST ruthless people around. This is the real version of GoT. Not only this? He grew up with these people.

Imagine growing up this way? No love. Just pomp & circumstance.

But by Gawd! The boy got the fuck out, and isn’t as beholden as his predecessor.

It really is a fascinating tale for the ages.

This man chose himself above the Firm. That’s a VERY big deal, & if I ever see him somewhere (I won’t) I’d love to give him a huge, warm hug, and thank him ever so much, for showing us what it means to have boundaries.

I’m SO glad he finally got “it”, & got out before history repeated itself.

by Anonymousreply 58March 15, 2023 5:03 AM

R55 GOOGLE : Working for a living

by Anonymousreply 59March 15, 2023 5:05 AM

R54 Speaking of husbands arse holes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60March 15, 2023 5:08 AM

Great post, R58!

So true.

by Anonymousreply 61March 15, 2023 5:11 AM

Oh big deal. Who hasn’t had to deal with relatives they’d rather not see at important family rituals like funerals and coronations?

by Anonymousreply 62March 15, 2023 5:14 AM

The “real version of game of thrones?” There is no question of who is next in line. It’s been peaceful since 1688 and will remain so until there is just one life between Charlotte and the throne. Then all bets are off.

by Anonymousreply 63March 15, 2023 5:17 AM

The grasping at the titles for the kids was pretty pathetic. If you want out of the RF, why would you care unless there’s something deeply hypocritical about you.

by Anonymousreply 64March 15, 2023 5:21 AM

R54 More CAPs that makes it true. Now keep you eyes on the road Dee.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65March 15, 2023 5:23 AM

r52" I think its more the case that they are using some of the proceeds of Spare to employ some bots and pretend fans to troll again, Ironic given their phoney stance on misinformation."

Self awareness is not your strong suit George . Misinformation as when you claimed per" your unimpeachable source " that Her Late Majesty was in the best of health only had a case of "piles "three weeks before she died. As for "phoney brides" think your late hubby had a lot to say about that in a court of law. BTW I never saw you in line to pay your respects to the the Queen who you claimed you"worshiped the ground she walked on" Were there no gender neutral loos at St James or did you pay your two fan bots to queue for you? Or perhaps you had a rug sale at your shop that day. Shite happens.

by Anonymousreply 66March 15, 2023 5:39 AM

[quote]I’m am TRULY impressed AF, that Harry got the fuck away from this profoundly dysfunctional family.

R58. Harry and his wife are the most dysfunctional of all and then perpetuate their dysfunction to make money no matter how they do it even while savaging the royal family. They are not trying to heal. They cannot be trusted. They are perpetual paid lying, grifting, mean-spirited narcissists. They are despicable. They deserve no sympathy.

by Anonymousreply 67March 15, 2023 6:19 AM

The Markles certainly weren't complaining when the royal family and the entire UK threw them a $38 million wedding. The Markles are grifting liars still sucking off the teat of the royal family because without their royal connection, they are nothing.

by Anonymousreply 68March 15, 2023 6:23 AM

You gotta wonder what is wrong with people who support this kind of trash. You have to have several screws loose to support such terrible people like H&M. There's something really wrong with you.

by Anonymousreply 69March 15, 2023 6:51 AM

R69 people get so committed to a narrative that when proven wrong they can’t face that they’ve been duped and they double down. I think that’s the majority of LSA Markle lovers.

by Anonymousreply 70March 15, 2023 6:58 AM

Tie Harry and Meghan to chairs and force them to watch a certain South Park episode over and over and over again until one of them explodes.

by Anonymousreply 71March 15, 2023 7:03 AM

[QUOTE]This is why I hope they act with dignity, attend the coronations of His Majesty and the Queen Adulterers,

Why should the frequent more frequent adultress, Diana be included on the Coronation list? She had quite a list of prime men pumping her IN THEIR PRIME, yet DLers cannot apportion Diana's horrible personality to the side.

And. since her oldest son William knew about all this as he was chosen as his mum's closest confidante. Does this sound like good, healthy, or desirable arrangement?

It's a mind fuck ain't it? Yet, the Sussex "demands" crack me the fuck up, especially since Megs has jet approval for the cartoon-named Princess Lilibet.

by Anonymousreply 72March 15, 2023 7:19 AM

^ Forgot to link.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73March 15, 2023 7:21 AM

Agreed, r69. The Harkles seem to attract some genuinely mentally ill online stans. Their fandom is among the most toxic out there, regularly making death threats and doxxing people. On here they also post graphic straight porn, to what end I'm not sure. I really think one of them is going to harm someone in the real world and it's only a matter of time. I wonder what it is about the couple that almost exclusively attracts such severely mentally ill people.

by Anonymousreply 74March 15, 2023 7:22 AM

[quote]"I can confirm The Duke has recently received email correspondence from His Majesty's office regarding the coronation. An immediate decision on whether The Duke and Duchess will attend will not be disclosed by us at this time."

Are we sure they are invited? This careful wording doesn't say that.

by Anonymousreply 75March 15, 2023 7:42 AM

Love seeing everyone gang up on the rancid Klan Granny chief, SurvivingRacist! Long may it last.

by Anonymousreply 76March 15, 2023 8:18 AM

[QUOTE] On here they also post graphic straight porn.

Mary! They're manips, Grandma.

by Anonymousreply 77March 15, 2023 8:20 AM

r56 Lady Colin Campbell never hated Diana. Can't you do nuance? Is everyone a pantomime villian or angel in your childish way of looking at the world? She has said good and bad and measured things about Diana on her YouTube channel and elsewhere.

r66 I think you will find I highlighted what a public source said about the Queens health and never made a claim in my own right. Falsely calling me George all the time suggests you are a puerile , malicious and desperate soul.

by Anonymousreply 78March 15, 2023 9:12 AM

The Harkles are probably balking at being relegated to the third-tier, non-working royals. Gotta keep up the pretense of connection to the RF to keep that grift going.

by Anonymousreply 79March 15, 2023 2:52 PM

R78 George the only cunt you ever possessed was your character.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80March 15, 2023 4:08 PM

[quote] Her daughter attended the Piers/Clarkson lunch and her step daughter is married to the Blackamoor brooch Royals son. Impartial my ass. When journalists are told what, when and how to report its right out of the fascist playbook.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81March 15, 2023 4:12 PM

Selling the dirt on the BRF seems to have worked out well for Harry. People bought the book in record numbers, and DataLounge just can't stop starting new threads, keeping the Royal Dream alive and well. Who is REALLY the sick one here?

by Anonymousreply 82March 15, 2023 4:27 PM

[quote] Who is REALLY the sick one here?

You, r82, for still swallowing the grifters' bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 83March 15, 2023 4:35 PM

Would you want to socialize with your relative and his wife who just trashed your family, aired its dirty laundry, and shat on its raison d'etre?

Who markets his titles? Who endlessly complains about media coverage, but courts it as it suits him?

I wouldn't.

by Anonymousreply 84March 15, 2023 4:39 PM

How dare William not want to socialize with him! It's clearly because his wife is black, NOT because Harry just slammed him mercilessly in his book!

by Anonymousreply 85March 15, 2023 4:45 PM

In Spare Harry labels three of the most insidious corrupt palace life time courtiers: The Bee,The Fly and The Wasp . Because they all sting members of the family sooner or later. They live to scheme , disassemble and leak stores to the ROTA (Royal press corps) about their favored and unfavored Windsors. They are like the palace eunuchs. Vayrs from GOT for real. They propagandize and spin to make Charlie look good even if the have to make his sons( both Willy & Harry and their wives ) look bad. These are the back stabbing "Grey Men" that Diana spoke of. They set out to destroy Diana in the press and they set out to do the the same with Meghan especially after the Sussexes tour of S. Africa got world wide favorable reviews. As with Diana overshadowing Charlie the 'Grey Men" would not permit the Sussexes to become more popular then Charles & Camilla. Their Pa's Side -Piece has a boatload of writers and reporters that are personal friends she has groomed over the last thirty years to re-hab her own sordid image. They gladly vomit up the stories the Queen Cuntsort spoon feeds them. Both Harry and William demanded a meeting with the Queen and Charles regarding these out of control slanderous "planted" stories. When they walked in the room The Bee,The Fly and The Wasp were sitting at the table. "Is this true? Her Majesty The Queen asked. "No ma'am !" they replied in unison. Any wonder why Harry and Meghan took their family and fled this nest of vipers.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 86March 15, 2023 4:54 PM

Harry would happily miss his father's coronation. It's that yacht-girl C-lister psycho pushing this humiliation on the Harkles. She would crawl over broken glass to be photographed at that ceremony. She has no shame and no pride, she convinces Harry not to have any either.

She needs the Coronation Chapter, with photos, for her memoir/fantasy book. They must appear to be royal adjacent, no matter that the real royals shun them like the plague. Those without pride or shame pretend not to notice they're in the Siberia seating section and everyone is studiously silent.

I wonder if they'll have Handsome Johnny sitting right behind them again, watching their every move?

by Anonymousreply 87March 15, 2023 5:57 PM

[QUOTE]This man chose himself above the Firm. That’s a VERY big deal, & if I ever see him somewhere (I won’t) I’d love to give him a huge, warm hug, and thank him ever so much, for showing us what it means to have boundaries.

🤣 This isn't a joke post?

Of course, you couldn't possibly surmise that Harry wanted to bask in the reflected glory of his family by requesting the half in, half out arrangement due to imperceptiveness issues, to put it kindly. (Hey! You have something in common with your hero.)

He very much wanted to remain on his terms so he could continue to suck on the Royal teat. The freedom narrative only began when the Queen gave him a firm NO.

Harry was perfectly content to remain in a "No love. Just pomp & circumstance." environment and market his association with them for cash on the side, conflicts of interest be damned.

by Anonymousreply 88March 15, 2023 6:17 PM

^Charles has the most terrifying dragon in Westros.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 89March 15, 2023 10:18 PM

They were mocked again on Gutfeld tonight. The audience started clapping!

by Anonymousreply 90March 16, 2023 4:37 AM

If I were the Prince and Princess of Wales -I would either limit/closely supervise any interaction between their children with the Sussex children or not allow it . The Sussex parents would not be above lying about them and saying they made racist or bullying comments to Archie or Lilibet . Sad for the cousins not knowing each other, but the Sussex parents have no concept of truth or decency .

by Anonymousreply 91March 16, 2023 5:17 PM

Gutfield? R90 what on Earth were you doing watching that awful lying hack? What's it for a paper you're writing on unattractive white-wing cunts?

Or is it that you don't have any discernment?

by Anonymousreply 92March 16, 2023 5:26 PM

[quote]but the Sussex parents have no concept of truth or decency.

Well, it seems it is a BRF trait.

by Anonymousreply 93March 16, 2023 5:27 PM

It's more of a Harkle trait.

by Anonymousreply 94March 16, 2023 5:34 PM

Damn, Camilla @R9! Bitch, you are too fucking old to not remember what a fucking HATPIN is.

by Anonymousreply 95March 16, 2023 5:51 PM

I doubt if many, if any, members of the Royal Family read "The Guardian," but the paper has a great feature worth reading each weekend -- "Dining Across The Divide." It brings together over a meal two people from opposite political views. They dis cuss a range of issues. Last week brought together a middle-aged man who's always voted Labour and a 21 year old man leaning left but tired of politics as usual. On the topic of the monarchy the older guy gave a very telling remark:

[quote]But where there’s silliness – certainly on the part of Harry – if it’s going to break down, they’re not worth the money we give them, no.

Most in Britain see his bestseller as little more than an exercise in self-pity, which might spell the ruin for the lot of them!

by Anonymousreply 96March 16, 2023 10:50 PM

R96 Bonnie Wrong. They read the Guardian. They read them all. The tabs are laid out every morning for the Windsors to read at breakfast. They eagerly devour them like the hyenas they are. Ironical that in the States print media is moribund but in UK royals and hoi polloi can't get enough of so called print "newspapers". BRF and Fleet St. are in a noxious symbiotic relationship. Each needs the other to survive.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 97March 16, 2023 11:56 PM

This is the kind of laughable lunacy that Derangers eagerly put money in Murdoch's pocket for.....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 98March 17, 2023 12:03 AM

r97 Newspaper circulation has massively declined in the UK over the past 25 years-What on earth are you talking about?You are making a threadbare weak argument by not only joining up the wrong dots but joining up non existent dots!

by Anonymousreply 99March 17, 2023 1:37 AM

[quote]They were mocked again on Gutfeld tonight. The audience started clapping!

Meanwhile, idiot Colbert is promoting them and Harry's book.

by Anonymousreply 100March 17, 2023 1:45 AM

R99 Massive decline like your bilious YouTube channel . Now go clean under your foreskin Georgie.

by Anonymousreply 101March 17, 2023 1:50 AM

r101 My God you are pathetic and childish.I am from Liverpool and many decades younger than Lady C.Grow up.

by Anonymousreply 102March 17, 2023 1:54 AM

R102 Liverpool. That explains a lot.

by Anonymousreply 103March 17, 2023 1:57 AM

Wait, so "Lady" Colin Campbell has foreskin on his cock?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104March 17, 2023 1:58 AM

I am also many decades younger then Lady Colin Campbell.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105March 17, 2023 2:06 AM

R100 Colbert hates the Brits. He's a professional Irishman with a professional Irishman's chip on his shoulder. He's one of those people who think the Irish were actually slaves. Just like the Africans!

by Anonymousreply 106March 17, 2023 2:11 AM

This is a really really stupid thread and not remotely funny or witty.

by Anonymousreply 107March 17, 2023 2:14 AM

r103 Pick your lane and pick your argument-I am either the very posh Lady Colin Campbell or I am from Liverpool and that makes me an undesirable in some way that explains a lot.Both lines of attack on the same person are not credible.You have a mouth that belongs in the sewer.

by Anonymousreply 108March 17, 2023 2:15 AM

Well, whoever wants to socialize with Harry and Meghan can invite them to a polo game or backyard pool party, and see what happens.

As we now know, they are happy to be long term houseguests and will be happy to eat your magic mushrooms and chat with your wastebins. They’ll critique your bed linens and broadcast the cut-or-uncut status of your cock. They’ll publish your emails and call you names. Your dog may wind up with two broken legs, and Harry may lose control of his bladder.

by Anonymousreply 109March 17, 2023 2:26 AM

Speaking of people who don't want to socialize with the Sussexes... The entire Academy - especially "Uncle Elton" and his guests.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110March 17, 2023 2:30 AM

r100, there is no downside to befriending Prince Harry.

The Duke and Duchess of Windsor were greatly in demand around the world after the abdication and exile.

Just like his mother after the divorce from King Tampax.

by Anonymousreply 111March 17, 2023 2:35 AM

R97, there's "The Daily Mail," and then there's "The Guardian" or "The Telegraph."

It's like comparing "The National Enquirer" to "The New York Times" or the "Wall Street Journal."

There is no "noxious symbiotic relationship" between "The Guardian" and any member of the British Royal Family, unless that person desires the end of the monarchy -- in short, is a closet republican.

"The Guardian," by and large, ignores the goings-on of the Windsors, except for actual newsworthy stories, to write about the Crown's vast wealth, its tax-dodging ways, Charles' spider memos, or calling for the monarchy's abolition.

by Anonymousreply 112March 17, 2023 2:37 AM

[quote]The Duke and Duchess of Windsor were greatly in demand around the world after the abdication and exile.

Yup. By all the best people.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113March 17, 2023 2:45 AM

R108 Lady Scouser's todger has spoken.

by Anonymousreply 114March 17, 2023 3:18 AM

We DECLINED the invitation!!!

by Anonymousreply 115March 17, 2023 3:23 AM

Like the Trumps of Mar A Largo the Windsors of Buck House live in their own totally delusional world. The armies of courtiers,flunkies and hangers on The Wasp, The Bee, The Fly have squeezed the toothpaste of sycophantic fairytales onto Charlie's tooth brush for the 74 years of his useless existence. Yet it's the Sussexes who are in some Hollywood California American unreal world? Positively Trumpian projection. Norma Desmond was a rank amateur compared to Charlie. His Majesty is ready for his close up. The bill is in the post.

by Anonymousreply 116March 17, 2023 3:38 AM

Oh hi Meg! Still waiting for all of those A-list projects with A-list directors?

by Anonymousreply 117March 17, 2023 3:41 AM

R108 Apoligies SurvivingScouser. Perhaps I was mistaken. Only a frau from Liverpool would think George Zaide "posh".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118March 17, 2023 4:04 AM

Wow! Zing, R118! Your posts, especially the monikers, are so clever, they make me think of the great satirical authors' wit and incisive observations. I especially like the super-clever "Cowmilla" and "Horsemilla!"

You're such an imaginative wordsmith, you should consider submittong your portfolio of satirical works to Private Eye or the Onion. I hear they are always on the lookout for juvenile talent.

by Anonymousreply 119March 17, 2023 4:25 AM

R86, I doubt Edward Young or Simon Case worked against the royals, or leaked to the press. Clive Alderton may have, to make Charles look better.

by Anonymousreply 120March 17, 2023 4:36 AM

Where have all the self-deluded Lipstick Alley refugees scurried to?

by Anonymousreply 121March 17, 2023 6:32 AM

R111 I assume you mean Hitler? The Duke and Duchess of Windsor seemed to be “in demand” by the Nazis.

“The Duchess was a complicated person, cold, mean-spirited, a bully and a sadist,” observed Dr Gaea Leinhardt, stepdaughter of Wallis’ ghost writer, Cleveland Amory. “My parents found the Duke not very bright, a wimp, and basically a very sad man. “

Sound familiar?

by Anonymousreply 122March 17, 2023 6:43 AM

R122 Sure does.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123March 17, 2023 5:00 PM

Not sure why we should care, but Madame Oprah has declared that the Harkles should "do what they feel is best for them and for their family" when asked by friend Gayle King whether the couple should attend King Charles III’s coronation.

by Anonymousreply 124March 17, 2023 5:44 PM

Yes. It’s so challenging to get the Harkles to think of themselves first.

by Anonymousreply 125March 17, 2023 6:21 PM

Wait, since Oprah has never been married, should she be called Mademoiselle?

by Anonymousreply 126March 17, 2023 6:31 PM


by Anonymousreply 127March 17, 2023 7:13 PM

The upside of the Sussexes “befriending” you is that it’s confirmation that you’re more important than they are. If you’re thirsty as fuck, they’ll collaborate and share some tabloid space with you (your name in bold!).

The “downside” of the Sussexes “befriending” you is that they will throw you under the bus at the drop of a hat. They will use you for everything you have: private jet, private club membership, whatever useful connections you have, your cock/pussy, paid gossip item, free lodging, drugs, dinner (you think either one of them has ever reached for the check when the waiter places it on the table?). They’ll air your dirty laundry to make a buck. They’ll make sure they’re papped with you whether you like it or not. And when they can’t use you for anything else, you’re flushed down the toilet.

And if you’re hoping to get connected to the actual royals, you can forget it, hahaha.

by Anonymousreply 128March 17, 2023 7:42 PM

R111 They were in demand by cafe society. They had, however, lost the sheen that attaches itself to the Real Thing. And that's the mistake the Sussexes made: they think Oprah and receiving the Crowned Heads of Europe draped in historic jewels are mutually inclusive. They aren't.

It was exactly the endless rounds of parties, cruises, galas, races, et al., that cheapened the Windsors to the symbols of empty wealth that clung to them.

It was Edward's successor and his wife who led the country through WWII and who ended up on balconies waving to cheering crowds.

Ain't nuthin' like the real thing, baby . . ..

Harry is a moron and clearly mentally ill. His wife is a shallow, hard-arsed, status obsessed bitch.

They should have stayed behind the protective screen of noblesse oblige, where no one could see it.

by Anonymousreply 129March 17, 2023 7:42 PM

When this is all over, that wedding day will go down as one of the most bizarre spectacles in royal history.

by Anonymousreply 130March 17, 2023 7:44 PM

^ Think about it, Oprah, trussed up in that nude dress, strutting through the grounds of Windsor Castle like she owned the place, with neither the dignity or common sense to be embarrassed she was attending the wedding of two people she barely knew. The whole lot of them. The whole thing. What an exercise.

by Anonymousreply 131March 17, 2023 7:46 PM

rt130, the wedding day of the fake marriage of The Duke and Duchess of Cornhole?

by Anonymousreply 132March 17, 2023 8:40 PM

R132, I don't even know what that means, but I know where you're from. Go back there and drink Pepsi with the rest of them.

by Anonymousreply 133March 17, 2023 8:46 PM

r133, THIS wedding.

Love Harry giving the side eye.

Prince Charles and the Duchess Of Cornwall attend the Service of Prayer and Dedication following their CIVIL marriage on April 9, 2005.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 134March 17, 2023 9:09 PM

Well, R134, if their marriage isn't legal, you've just invalidated a significant number of other marriages as well.

You seem like so much fun for someone so intelligent!

by Anonymousreply 135March 17, 2023 9:35 PM

Gad you are a cunt. It is a legal wedding for the Defender of the faith when his adulterous wife's husband is still living.

Civil legal. Jesus weeps.

by Anonymousreply 136March 17, 2023 11:26 PM

I thought he was the "Defender of the Faiths" now?

by Anonymousreply 137March 17, 2023 11:43 PM

Only if he changes the language of the oath during the installation of the crown.

by Anonymousreply 138March 18, 2023 12:00 AM

He's Defender of The Taints.

by Anonymousreply 139March 18, 2023 1:09 AM

[quote]The Harkles seem to attract some genuinely mentally ill online stans.

Said without a trace of irony.

by Anonymousreply 140March 18, 2023 1:15 AM
by Anonymousreply 141March 18, 2023 1:23 AM

Apparently the Sussexes want to be included on the balcony for the Coronation- with all the people and the establishment that mistreated them! God they are making fools out of their sugars and supporters.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142March 18, 2023 1:52 AM

[quote] Apparently the Sussexes want to be included on the balcony for the Coronation

Go big or go home!

by Anonymousreply 143March 18, 2023 1:57 AM

Ideally the latter.

WTF is wrong with those two? They are a couple of head cases.

by Anonymousreply 144March 18, 2023 1:59 AM

Gotta admit that they have balls to demand anything.

by Anonymousreply 145March 18, 2023 2:24 AM

Whether you like her or not, Queen Mary certainly looked majestic with all of her tiaras and jewels.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 146March 18, 2023 3:48 PM

There’s no such thing as simply accepting an invitation. It requires negotiation. Tyler Perry would only attend Lilibet’s baptism if it was held in the US. He wasn’t taking his ass to England. (He probably doesn’t have a passport.)

Queen Elizabeth couldn’t suggest that Meghan wear a hat, but Queen Tyler could tell her where to baptize her chirren.

by Anonymousreply 147March 18, 2023 3:59 PM

Maybe his jet doesn't have the range to cross the Atlantic?

by Anonymousreply 148March 18, 2023 5:06 PM

By appointment to His Majesty limited Wedgewood 12 cup boxed set is released! Get out your credit card Hyacinth!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 149March 18, 2023 5:10 PM

Her acting certainly didn't.

by Anonymousreply 150March 18, 2023 5:12 PM

^ It's one's charge plate dear.

by Anonymousreply 151March 18, 2023 5:20 PM

His jet goes from Atlanta to LA, so I’m guessing it would reach England. I think he’s intimidated, honestly. And no shame, I would be, too.

by Anonymousreply 152March 18, 2023 5:33 PM

The mug at r149 is funny.

Yeah, after calling the RF racist, he might not feel too comfortable.

by Anonymousreply 153March 18, 2023 6:15 PM

Nobody outside the US has a clue who Tyler Perry is. Like with Oprah, US TV people with few exceptions - like the Friends cast - are unknown outside the US.

I'm an American and I have no fucking clue who Tyler Perry is. All I know is he dresses in drag to play some old black woman in TV shows I've never seen.

by Anonymousreply 154March 18, 2023 6:39 PM

Oh is that who he is? LOL. They just keep getting classier. Definite A list.

by Anonymousreply 155March 18, 2023 6:44 PM

Deranger Thread Fumigant

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156March 18, 2023 7:10 PM

^ Is that little Archie?

by Anonymousreply 157March 18, 2023 7:10 PM

It's Mother's Day across the pond. Here is Charles and Camilla's post.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158March 19, 2023 12:48 PM

William and Catherine's post.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159March 19, 2023 12:49 PM

[quote] William and Catherine's post.

Charles clearly loved his mother.

Obviously, William forgot he ever had one.

Fucking cunt.

by Anonymousreply 160March 19, 2023 1:07 PM

^ The Windsors certainly need to move to higher ground.

by Anonymousreply 161March 19, 2023 1:50 PM

R160 - Not dwelling in the past and moving forward is much healthier for your well being than always thinking about your loss.

by Anonymousreply 162March 19, 2023 2:33 PM

R162 I'm bloody well jealous.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 163March 19, 2023 3:26 PM

While Harry would like to claim Diana as his and his alone (including tripe about how she is watching his (only his?) life), it's plain that

(1) William was her favorite

(2) Diana would be horrified at Harry's attack on the RF

(3) At the time of her death, after being cast as confidant by his mother, William at 15 was smart enough and old enough to begin pulling away and to start to have a much clearer, accurate picture of his mother. He could still love her, but was probably much more aware of her less than admirable qualities.

(4) After Diana's death William got in touch with those who knew Diana best to learn who his mother really was. Rather than the facade she produced for public consumption.

(5) Diana would have sent Markle packing as soon as she appeared on the scene. (Being a manipulator herself, Diana would have nosed out the scamming Markle and given her no help at all).

Harry's 12 year old self remains as does the image of his mother as she appeared to him at that time.

by Anonymousreply 164March 19, 2023 3:48 PM

Re. point 2, I don't think horrified given she'd done her fair share of it, but she wouldn't approve - it's damaging William. Re point 5, agree 100%.

But I argue if Diana was alive, Harry wouldn't be the man he is now. Probably still a bit of a loser but not vulnerable to the influences and impulses that have made him the figure he has become. This is all because his mother died too young (in both cases) and he wasn't supported (or managed) properly after the fact. I mean he's still a spoiled baby, probably, but the vengefulness would have been less pronounced if it existed at all.

What's interesting is what kind of man William would have become, had his mother lived.

by Anonymousreply 165March 19, 2023 5:44 PM

Do keep up with the times r92.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 166March 20, 2023 5:48 AM

R156 etc stop trying to make “deranger” happen - it’s not going to happen. Better to focus on choosing a nationality and sticking to it. English? American? You’ve claimed both on various BRF threads lately.

The one thing common to both is that you are nuts and curiously invested, even more than the usual BRF thread loon. Hundred of replies to yourself and others! You’re certainly prolific, so there’s that, I guess.

by Anonymousreply 167March 20, 2023 6:30 AM

You’d have to be a special kind of stupid to think that Camilla was the only or even main reason Diana’s marriage failed.

She and Chuck were so ill-suited, divorce or a miserable coexistence were the only possible outcomes.

by Anonymousreply 168March 21, 2023 11:41 AM

If H&M actually attend that shit show they are nothing but gluttons for punishment. Why on earth would they be dumb enough to think they'd be treated as anything but pariahs? And why on earth would they willingly put themselves into that position?

Harry needs to make up his mind. Either forget that bunch back home, other than for once in a while private visits, or get your ass back to merry old England and resume what you claim is your birthright whole hog. You can not have your cake and eat it too.

by Anonymousreply 169March 21, 2023 11:47 AM

There’s no socializing with someone like Meghan. Every interaction is transactional and self-promoting. And if you can’t be useful, she’ll not spend a precious breath on you.

And what can she do for anyone? Introduce them to an exiled prince? Get them an audience with Oprah?

by Anonymousreply 170March 21, 2023 2:39 PM

I wonder what their private social lives are like. After all, this, you'd think pretty empty... just the kind of people who'd put up with the kind of people they are. Surely none of the A list wants anything to do with them?

by Anonymousreply 171March 21, 2023 3:16 PM

You have to be a special kind of evil cunt R168 to think Camilla is not an evil cunt.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172March 21, 2023 3:22 PM

I don't think they have any friends. Even in the fakeumentery she had to have employees pose as "friends".

by Anonymousreply 173March 21, 2023 3:45 PM

I agree with you, R169.

They would just be setting themselves up for humiliation (again) if they attended the coronation.

The best thing they can do is stay away. Shun the BRF completely, and live separate lives.

I hate to say it, but that bridge is totally burned.

William is such an angry and petty CUNT, that there's no way he could ever man up and forgive Harry for these perceived slights. William is an angry and petulant child, and he lacks the skills to be an adult.

Harry needs to realize this, and just move on. Focus on his family.

by Anonymousreply 174March 21, 2023 3:51 PM

R174, you made some sense until the rubbish about William. Anger, childish, petulance, lacking adult skills... that's not William, that's your boy.

But we agree, they should stay away, maintain a dignified silence and live separate lives.

by Anonymousreply 175March 21, 2023 4:10 PM

Yep r175. That's definitely Harry and his gutter heaux.

by Anonymousreply 176March 21, 2023 4:27 PM

[quote]If H&M actually attend that shit show they are nothing but gluttons for punishment.

There is no way in hell that these two lying, dishonorable, money-grubbing grifters in Montecito will miss attending the coronation. Their entire existence and relevancy depends on being royal adjacent. They crave the attention while lying about their precious privacy. They will not miss being in coronation photographs that will last an eternity. This whole, stupid cat-and-mouse game about whether or not they will attend is pure, contrived bullshit. They will crawl over broken glass if necessary to be there. But no, they will not be on the balcony--the big fat, jizz, spray-me-with-cum money shot that they want the most.

by Anonymousreply 177March 21, 2023 4:34 PM

I agree, they're coming. Someone is revelling in the speculation. Soulless, there's opportunity in the waiting game and then the round of complaints about how terribly they were treated. I can't figure out if they don't understand consequence or if their lives are so empty this media game provides some meaning. Dreadful people.

by Anonymousreply 178March 21, 2023 5:11 PM

I [italic]really[/italic] hope they attend the Coronation. DL will be fun while dissecting Mr and Mrs Markle's inevitable shitshow.

by Anonymousreply 179March 22, 2023 11:57 AM

[quote] I really hope they attend the Coronation. DL will be fun while dissecting Mr and Mrs Markle's inevitable shitshow.

Their favorability rating actually went up when they visited the UK for the Queen's funeral.

Mainly because they kept a very low profile and did everything they were told.

Harry and Meghan were very well behaved the entire time.

by Anonymousreply 180March 22, 2023 12:06 PM

Agreed that she would crawl over shattered glass in order to be at that coronation.

He might be wavering out of embarrassment, but she has no such scruples and IS GOING.

So they both are going, no matter what.

by Anonymousreply 181March 22, 2023 12:15 PM

R168 Even the Archbishop of Canterbury said in his memoirs that he was appalled at how ill-suited they were when they made their pre-marriage visits to him.

It takes two to tango, as the old saying has it. That marriage was in trouble by the time the honeymoon was over.

by Anonymousreply 182March 22, 2023 1:28 PM

[quote] Even the Archbishop of Canterbury said in his memoirs that he was appalled at how ill-suited they were when they made their pre-marriage visits to him.

[quote] That marriage was in trouble by the time the honeymoon was over.

Harry knew that he wanted to marry Meghan, and vice-versa.

William never wanted to marry Kate, and that's why they broke up. She felt the relationship was going nowhere.

But Waity Katie waited around for the BIG PRIZE, and she got it.

She couldn't care less about William. She just wanted to be Queen one day. And William needed a wife.

So it worked out for both of them, even though they don't really like each other.

Which is why she looks the other way, when William sleeps with Rose Hanbury.

So go fuck yourself, R182.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 183March 22, 2023 1:34 PM

You don't know that to be true, R183, and that you insist upon it so adamantly tells thinking people all they need to know. Pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 184March 22, 2023 1:43 PM

[quote] She and Chuck were so ill-suited, divorce or a miserable coexistence were the only possible outcomes.

Seriously. That interview where Charles said, “whatever love means” was very awkward. He was obviously unenthusiastic and Diana was clearly a complete mismatch for him. Red flags everywhere. But everyone, including myself, loved her. Superficially speaking. She was so lovely to look at. Just the right amount of pretty for a royal and she wore clothes beautifully. Those of us who were fans wanted to believe they would work.

by Anonymousreply 185March 22, 2023 1:44 PM

At the time, the only people who might have seen red flags were true insiders. The rest of us saw what we wanted to see.

by Anonymousreply 186March 22, 2023 1:50 PM

The Archbishop is jealous of me, and is also a racist!!!

by Anonymousreply 187March 22, 2023 2:37 PM

R182 is talking about the Archbishop's feelings about Charles and Diana, not Harry and Meghan

by Anonymousreply 188March 22, 2023 2:44 PM

The Sussex stans like R183 are so fucking dumb. They can't even read and follow a conversation.

by Anonymousreply 189March 22, 2023 9:02 PM

I can't understand why people attack William or Kate with venom. They do their jobs, they don't act like jerks. The Californians... they're assholes... and they love it, I can see why you attack them. But William and Kate are by no reasonable standard equally bad. It's night and day.

by Anonymousreply 190March 22, 2023 9:09 PM

r189. what you say, Willis?

by Anonymousreply 191March 22, 2023 9:27 PM

They can't capitalize, either.

by Anonymousreply 192March 22, 2023 9:29 PM

Charles can't really force his family members to be entirely nice to Harry and Meghan--they can cut the Sussexes in all kinds of subtle ways. Of course, if they do, they'll just have it printed in the next memoir, but I bet some of them (Anne, the Prince and Princess of Wales) are already plotting things they can do to be cold.

by Anonymousreply 193March 22, 2023 9:32 PM

Hey William at R189 and R190.

How tight is Rose's pussy?

Does she suck cock better than Waity Katie?

Must be why you keep going back to your mistress.

I don't blame you. Kate is old and haggard.

Your cheating is well known all around the world!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 194March 22, 2023 10:11 PM

r192 ¿whothemotherfuckingcuntdoyouthinkyouare?

by Anonymousreply 195March 22, 2023 11:22 PM

Yes R183 the Waleses clearly cannot stand each other.

You’re not a very good friend if you’re repeating Kate’s news that she cannot stand William - when did she tell you this?

By the way the woman who you are obsessed with is the Marchioness of Cholmondeley, not “Rose Hanbury”. But like all the Sussex Squad you can’t spell and are frightened of big words. It’s how you and your trash squaddies are so easily identified.

by Anonymousreply 196March 23, 2023 12:36 AM

R183 you’re a fucking idiot. R182 was referring to what a previous Archbishop of Canterbury said about Charles and Diana - nothing to do with Hazza and his whore.

by Anonymousreply 197March 23, 2023 12:42 AM

Another to easily identify the trash that is R183 / R194 is its liberal use of “cunt”, usually spelled as “CUNT!!!”.

Makes it so much easier for my judicious use of F&F. It’s quite effective.

by Anonymousreply 198March 23, 2023 12:51 AM

[quote]Charles clearly loved his mother.

[Quote]Obviously, William forgot he ever had one.

[Quote]Fucking cunt.

This is the first Mother's Day since Charles' mother died, so of course his post was about her. Obviously.

by Anonymousreply 199March 23, 2023 1:04 AM

Why are we still talking about these irrelevant 19th century curios?

by Anonymousreply 200March 23, 2023 1:53 AM

Why are you here, R200, if you’re not interested?

by Anonymousreply 201March 23, 2023 3:02 AM

R194 Meghan is having an episode.

by Anonymousreply 202March 23, 2023 7:59 AM

Meghan's invading diabetics always reflect so well on her. Really, the adoring and the unadorable are perfectly suited. Meghan would be so proud.

by Anonymousreply 203March 23, 2023 11:15 AM

"when they visited the UK for the Queen's funeral" - They didn't visit the UK for the Queen's funeral, r180, they were already in the country on one of their rare visits for their own promotional purposes, which did not involve meeting Harry's family or making an effort to visit his aged grandmother who was obviously in her final days and whom they were unlikely to ever see again.

by Anonymousreply 204March 23, 2023 11:24 AM

I don't know what this child did but William was getting a kick out of his antics.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 205March 23, 2023 2:07 PM

Downs... lovely, loving temperaments. That's the power of position. He responds with caring. That's the power of it. Example can move.

by Anonymousreply 206March 23, 2023 2:41 PM

Princess Margaret’s granddaughter Lady Margarita Armstrong Jones on the cover of Tatler.

I always thought that she was prettier than trout mouth Lady Amelia Windsor who gets all of the attention.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 207March 23, 2023 2:44 PM

^ Nothing remarkable.

by Anonymousreply 208March 23, 2023 2:45 PM

The Kate and William stans are having a meltdown on this thread!!!

They hate hearing about William the Cheater and Kate the Bulemic.

It ruins their narrative of the perfect, happy couple.

Clearly, the "Men in Gray" post on this thread.

But it doesn't work any more.

Not in this day and age of social media where the truth ALWAYS comes out.

William is an adulterer and Waity Katie is extremely unhappy and anorexic/bulemic.

by Anonymousreply 209March 23, 2023 10:16 PM

[quote] By the way the woman who you are obsessed with is the Marchioness of Cholmondeley, not “Rose Hanbury”.

Rose Hanbury IS the Marchioness of Cholmondeley.

No oen here--[bold]no one[/bold]--is required to refer to her by her formal title used in the Court Circular. You seem to be the same troll who keeps repeating that we have to call people by their titles, and we do [bold]not.[/bold]

by Anonymousreply 210March 23, 2023 10:20 PM

You forgot to link one of your usual trite, juvenile memes, r209. They always have more of an impact when repeated a dozen times.

by Anonymousreply 211March 23, 2023 10:23 PM

Brava, R210!

I'm so glad you told off that BRF cunt licking troll who INSISTS that we "respect" the BRF.

They can go fuck themselves.

by Anonymousreply 212March 23, 2023 10:23 PM

R209 Are the Waleses in the room with you, Dear? Are you being named a godparent to Black King Archie?

by Anonymousreply 213March 23, 2023 10:33 PM

r212, he keeps demanding that we use proper titles, and yet even THEY do not require that people refer to them by their proper titles. It's just OCD assholery that keeps prompting him to insist again and again and again.

by Anonymousreply 214March 23, 2023 10:40 PM

Actually R210, R212, R213 and R214 I was simply alluding to the fact that the demographic of the average Sussex Stan is of someone who was knocked up at 13 and 15 by different baby daddies so left school early and never learned to spell. Therefore “Hanbury” v’s “Cholmondeley”. But you knew that.

Lovely of you to defend them, though.

Over to you to call me a CUNT, or Hyacinth, or Deranger or the classic Klan Grannie - so clever.

by Anonymousreply 215March 23, 2023 10:50 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 216March 23, 2023 11:23 PM

R209 Jesus, please take your medication. Mania doesn’t look good on you.

by Anonymousreply 217March 24, 2023 12:55 AM

No they weren't r180. The exact opposite in fact.

by Anonymousreply 218March 24, 2023 4:28 AM

Interesting how R210 R212 R213 and R214 have gone quiet to my response - it’s almost as though they have nothing to say in reply, given that what I said was the truth.

Rock on Squaddies, you illiterate diabetic trash!

by Anonymousreply 219March 24, 2023 6:44 AM

They don't come here to engage. They're gangbangers. They come, they open fire, and then scurry back to the squalor they come from, hoping not to get caught. Nice to see the once and future in custody R209 get lined out. Scum here, scum everywhere.

by Anonymousreply 220March 24, 2023 12:27 PM

Phew! Need Deranger Thread Fumigant

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 221March 25, 2023 3:16 AM

Ahead of his Coronation on 6 May 23, His Majesty King Charles has bestowed a rare set of honours upon those who held important roles during the preparations & funeral of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 222March 25, 2023 4:01 PM

Harry at r221 is actually showing a select few kids up front and out of camera range his technique for rolling the tightest joint. The boy's got job skills he can share in the inner city because, as Sussex fans are well aware, "sharing is service." Get those nimble little fingers working for the local dealer!

by Anonymousreply 223March 25, 2023 4:21 PM

r222, so he isn't fucking over the pallbearers.

by Anonymousreply 224March 25, 2023 6:34 PM

R222 Hopefully they'll be back to work soon.

by Anonymousreply 225March 25, 2023 6:45 PM

Toll Free R223

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 226March 25, 2023 7:22 PM

Just seat the SouthParkles in the Siberia section of the Abbey. Nobody wants to talk to them and nobody has to talk to them. If they're dumb and hypocritical enough to show up, they deserve a frostbite reception and general audience seating.

No socializing, no little Merchie and Invisibet present at the coronation, no balcony appearance for the Duke and Duchess of PRIVACY. Give them nothing as they desperately try to grasp at anything royal.

by Anonymousreply 227March 25, 2023 7:39 PM

The Maul claiming they are negotiating to be on the balcony.

I just don't see how that happens. If that happens, what is the point of it all? Do they stand for anything? Does anything matter any more?

by Anonymousreply 228March 25, 2023 10:38 PM

I think Charles is rewarding those who have been loyal and hard-working, as evidenced in r222. He’s in that mode right now, letting folks know that their loyalty is appreciated, at the start of his reign.

This also sends a message to those who have rendered themselves useless and disloyal. I don’t think the king is rewarding Harry and Meghan OR the Yorks.

by Anonymousreply 229March 25, 2023 11:36 PM

If he lets them on the balcony after the Royalty is Evil Tour, he's as stupid as his mother always covering for Andrew.

And I wonder how the Squad will excuse their hypocrisy for WANTING to be on the balcony

by Anonymousreply 230March 26, 2023 2:40 AM

^ It's all about the CAPS Dee.

by Anonymousreply 231March 26, 2023 3:23 AM

It's glaringly obvious that the "grey men" are running scared. They're sending Mr Potato Head off to Polish gay bars and Stepford Wife Katie to read robo speeches to half a dozen non entities. This is the best the decrepit Windsor's can come up with?

by Anonymousreply 232March 26, 2023 3:38 AM

Rofl R232!


by Anonymousreply 233March 26, 2023 3:40 AM

R232 Perhaps the Peg Of Wales can get a gig in a Polish gay bar.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 234March 26, 2023 6:25 AM

Colbert has become a smug starfucker, hope he gets canceled.

by Anonymousreply 235March 26, 2023 6:49 AM

R232 you are aware you are posting on the DL a site for gay men? You aren't on Lipstick Alley here, Dawakanda. Take your homophobia back to your sistahs.

by Anonymousreply 236March 26, 2023 7:05 AM

It's pointless to cite stories in the tabloids, because the tabloids make it up knowing that as long as they say "it is reported that" or play the tired old "a palace insider said" . . .

No Palace insider would tell the press anything of the kind. These are all pot-stirring stories that no one will be held accountable for running, because otherwise the Palace would be doing nothing else from dawn to dusk.

No one knows what's going on behind the scenes. But I think it's safe to suppose that Charles knows only too well that putting the Sussexes on that balcony would generate a wave of boos that could be heard in outer space, and tacitly endorse everything the Sussexes have done to undermine the King and William for the last three years. I doubt William and Kate would even set foot on the balcony if Charles tried it on- but why the hell would he want to?! He's got enough problems.

Because, if the Sussexes got on, then Andrew, who also clearly isn't going to be on that balcony, would be quite justified in heading to France to raise an army to depose his brother. The insult would be beyond bearing.

And, for further evidence that the story is total bollocks - the royal website was just updated: the Sussex's web pages were moved to below the rest of the working royals, despite outranking them in the line of succession.

If you think that was an Act of God, think again. In small, incremental ways, Charles is carefully making himself clear: no more rent-free Frogmore Cottage near the Walse family because the Wales won't stand for it; Sussex web pages moved to the back of the line; Counsellors of State added to the list so that the King can skip over Harry and Andrew when he travels; no appearance on the balcony; seating at the coronation as per their relevance to the future of the monarchy (i.e., none).

They got their kids' titles. That's all they're going to get.

Charles doesn't have his mother's "bonte" (a broad sense of good will - it was one of her well-known personality traits, and sometimes too much so, but there it is)

Charlese is known to be thin-skinned and peevish - especially where insults to his wife and his status are concerned. He's a very odd combination of an essentially Edwardian man with a veneer of modernity.

The Sussexes will not appear on the balcony, nor will Harry be wearing ermine robes or a coronet, as none of the other peers will be wearing them, either.

If you watch footage of the Queen's funeral, the first time God Save the King is played, Harry's face is a portrait of hate, and even for the sake of optics he barely mouths a few words.

In fact, I'd be surprised if any joint family photos in BP afterwards included the Sussexes.

If Harry and Meghan have the sense of goats, they'll politely decline. If they don't, they'll get the same treatment they did at the Jubilee: a seat in the second row, no role in the procession or ceremony, no balcony appearance, and no family photos.

by Anonymousreply 237March 26, 2023 1:09 PM

The UK tabloids used to invent royal stories - they also invent celebrity stories - to sell papers. Now they do it for clicks. They work on the schadenfreude principle: make their readers believe that all rich and famous people are more miserable than they are.

Meghan Markle's whole problem is she was never famous enough to be in the US tabs. If she had been, she'd have realized tabloids weren't her Suits publicists.

by Anonymousreply 238March 26, 2023 6:53 PM

Harry & Meghan need to stay away from the perverted Windsors. For the safety of their children. Mountbatten was King Charlies "inspiration and mentor." Tells you all you need to know about King Tampon and the pedos who idolize him.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 239March 26, 2023 7:30 PM

Foreplay in the British Royal Family.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 240March 26, 2023 7:33 PM

R239 should probably tell them to drop their titles and cut all contact then.

by Anonymousreply 241March 26, 2023 7:37 PM

Jeez, Harry and Meghan should probably stay home in California where it’s nice and safe. Why do they want to be sitting with all those dangerous perverts? And bringing their poor innocent children and exposing them to the poisonous BRF?

by Anonymousreply 242March 26, 2023 7:46 PM

R241 and your ilk : Have you no decency?

by Anonymousreply 243March 26, 2023 7:52 PM

R243 do you? If everyone who had a close relationship with a pedophile was guilty by association, most of the world would be a monster in your eyes.

But the question is, and your squaddies NEVER have an answer, if the Royal family is so rotten to the core, why are your faves SO desperate to hold onto their association?

by Anonymousreply 244March 26, 2023 7:56 PM

Diana's niece, Lady Amelia Spencer, was recently married in South Africa. Daddy Earl Spencer did not attend.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 245March 26, 2023 8:04 PM

I don't know who you are talking to R244 or what a squaddie is but it may be that a lot of these stories are made up to hook gullible old ladies like you? No one knows what's going on behind the scenes.

by Anonymousreply 246March 26, 2023 8:09 PM

R244 Do CAPS make up for having absolutely no morals?

by Anonymousreply 247March 26, 2023 8:10 PM

Someone imagined what King Charles III would look like at his Coronation in May. Well, I heard he was wearing a uniform not old fashioned breeches.

by Anonymousreply 248March 26, 2023 8:10 PM

^ Sorry here's the portrait.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 249March 26, 2023 8:11 PM

R248 You heard right luv. Eaiser to shag the page boys.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 250March 26, 2023 8:13 PM

R246 hun, I'm not a little old lady. And how is it fake stories when they literally use royal titles on everything they do.

If I had escaped a horrible toxic environment, as you and they claim his family is...I'd probably stop reminding people of my connection to them. But hey, that's just me.

by Anonymousreply 251March 26, 2023 8:15 PM

R244 Thinks "most of the world has close relationships with pedophiles". Tells you all need to know about her and her royalist perves

by Anonymousreply 252March 26, 2023 8:16 PM

I claim? I never said any such thing R251. I'm merely saying quit believing everything in gossip rags. Those worthless pieces of shit that's printed for fangurls full of half truths and innuendo.

by Anonymousreply 253March 26, 2023 8:19 PM

R251 - Granny revealed. They always claim people said things they didnt like trolls always do.

by Anonymousreply 254March 26, 2023 8:21 PM

King Pedo and another one of his "mentors"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 255March 26, 2023 8:22 PM

A lot of what we get is deliberately planted in the tabloids by Harry and Meghan.

This "wanting to be part of the family on this important balcony occasion" bullshit was a pure Sussex plant. Fuck them, they'll never be on that balcony again.

The late Queen arranged everything before she died. NO to Sussex participation in the Jubilee/Coronation. NO to Sussex participation on the balcony for the Jubilee/Coronation. No half-in and half-out fucked up "arrangement" for the Sussexes, the late Queen put a stop to that shit. No Andrew participating on the Jubilee/Coronation and no Andrew on the balcony. Andrew has to give up Royal Lodge and move into Frogmore "cottage" now. The late Queen was very wise and she knew the right way forward. No Sussexes, No Yorks. On the orders of the late Queen herself.

When does Omid Scoobydoo get SouthParkled, he's pushing out their "leaks" and planted stories but they're all failing miserably, when does Scoobydoo get the boot?

by Anonymousreply 256March 26, 2023 8:29 PM

Prince Nazi.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 257March 26, 2023 8:32 PM

Prince Naked Billiards

The naked shots have been scrubbed (I didn't see any anyway) but they can't scrub the headlines.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 258March 26, 2023 8:36 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 259March 26, 2023 8:39 PM

R257 Queen Elizabeth,Princess Margaret and The Queen Mum of the Saxe Coburg-Gotha Nazis😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 260March 26, 2023 9:09 PM

All over18 years of age shite for brains R258

by Anonymousreply 261March 26, 2023 9:10 PM

^ That's why I wasn't there.

by Anonymousreply 262March 26, 2023 9:11 PM

I wonder when Harry is going to get deported because he lied on his visa application about his drug use. Where will he go? Can't really go back to the UK. Burned his bridges there. Maybe Botswana? But will Meghan be happy where there are no paparazzi to call?

by Anonymousreply 263March 26, 2023 9:13 PM

Now I ask you Hyacinth ,does this look like the face of a depraved pedophile?

I'll wait.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 264March 26, 2023 9:13 PM

Why is Meghan Markle paying trolls to haunt the DL? Makes no sense. DL has always hated D list golddigging starlets. And she's no exception.

by Anonymousreply 265March 26, 2023 9:16 PM

R239 Makes perfect sense. Lord Mountbatten was Edward VIII /Duke of Windsor's closest mate. Edward was a small slightly built man. He was practically hairless. He shaved once a week. One of his doctors said he had small pre adolescent looking genitals and nude looked like a 12 yo boy at the age of 32. Snap is of Dickie and David sharing a pool on their world tour. Close as two peas in a pod. Explains a lot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 266March 26, 2023 9:33 PM

R265 Your meds are in the fridge Dee.

by Anonymousreply 267March 26, 2023 9:37 PM

R236 How does using the phrase "gay bar" on a gay website constitute "homophobia" you dotty Klan Granny?

by Anonymousreply 268March 26, 2023 9:58 PM

[QUOTE]When does Omid Scoobydoo get SouthParkled

A Stone and Parker caricature of Scobie could be devastating. They could make the character's skin whiter than Harry's, give him a huge set of chiclet teeth, and call him Ahmed.

by Anonymousreply 269March 27, 2023 5:19 AM

Hey, young Mountbatten at R266 is cute.

by Anonymousreply 270March 27, 2023 9:46 AM

[quote] Lord Mountbatten was Edward VIII /Duke of Windsor's closest mate.

[quote] Hey, young Mountbatten at R266 is cute.

Ron Perks, Mountbatten's driver in Malta in 1948, alleged that he used to visit the Red House, an upmarket gay brothel in Rabat used by naval officers. Andrew Lownie, a fellow of the Royal Historical Society, wrote that the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) maintained files regarding Mountbatten's alleged homosexuality.

Lownie also interviewed several young men who claimed to have been in a relationship with Mountbatten. John Barratt, Mountbatten's personal and private secretary for 20 years, has said Mountbatten was not a homosexual, and that it would have been impossible for such a fact to have been hidden from him.

In 2019, files became public showing that the FBI knew in the 1940s of allegations that Mountbatten was homosexual and a paedophile. The FBI file on Mountbatten, begun after he took on the role of Supreme Allied Commander in Southeast Asia in 1944, describes Mountbatten and his wife a as "persons of extremely low morals", and contains a claim by American author Elizabeth, Baroness Decies, that Mountbatten was known to be a homosexual and had "a perversion for young boys".

Norman Nield, Mountbatten's driver from 1942 to 1943, told the tabloid New Zealand Truth that he transported young boys aged 8 to 12 who had been procured for the Admiral to Mountbatten's official residence and was paid to keep quiet. Robin Bryans had also claimed to the Irish magazine Now that Mountbatten and Anthony Blunt, along with others, were part of a ring that engaged in homosexual orgies and procured boys in their first year at public schools such as the Portora Royal School in Enniskillen.

Former residents of the Kincora Boys' Home in Belfast have asserted that they were trafficked to Mountbatten at Classiebawn Castle, his residence in Mullaghmore, County Sligo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 271March 27, 2023 10:17 AM

Is that why the IRA bombed him? Retribution?

by Anonymousreply 272March 27, 2023 11:54 AM

Funny R271 should pop up today because The Times has this article, which has four notable tidbits:

1) Larman said he suspected material on Prince Philip was not being made available because the royal household at the time “really did not want him to marry the Queen” - inference being the material makes somebody look bad, but not necessarily Prince Philip (on the basis the marriage went ahead. But if there were scathing or stretched efforts to discredit him, and it got out in his lifetime, the authors would have to own it, which if it came out at the wrong time could affect careers.)

2). "Larman said that in contrast (to lots of information about the Duke of Windsor), information on Prince Philip appeared to have been excised and there was little on Prince George, the Duke of Kent, who died in a plane crash in Scotland in 1942. The Duke of Kent is long rumoured to have had homosexual affairs, including with Noel Coward.

3) There's a body of evidence suggesting an assassination plot against the Duke of Windsor. But one fact doesn't add up entirely... he abdicated very late in 1936 so any plot to get him would have been before abdication not after. And it sounds unusual the Duke/King would be riding in public in London. In the grounds of Buckingham Palace maybe but randomly out in public? I'd want to know more about that before I took it as gospel.) "Larman said details in MI5 documents that had been briefly available at the National Archives but had now been resealed matched other information pointing to George McMahon as in effect being sanctioned by the security services to assassinate the king after he had abdicated. The attempted assassination on the duke in 1936 as he was riding his horse in London failed when McMahon dropped the weapon."

4) He told the festival that the Duke of Windsor, who abdicated in 1936 over his love for Wallis Simpson, an American divorcee , said he had provided “inside information” on the layout of Buckingham Palace. The Nazis bombed the palace in 1940 with several bombs hitting “family quarters”. Larman said there was no doubt that the duke was a Nazi sympathiser and that it looked as if he had provided information to them. “The Nazis knew what they were doing and that was because they had inside information [from the duke],” Larman said. “I don’t think he [Edward VIII] wanted to see him [his brother, George VI] dead but . . . he was in a position where he knew exactly where everybody was in Buckingham Palace.”

Something to look forward to, if we're all still here: Larman said the countdown had begun on securing access to the archive of Alan Lascelles, royal secretary to four British monarchs between 1920-1953 and later keeper of the Royal Archives. The archive is held at Churchill College, Cambridge and is not to be opened until five years after the Queen’s death.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 273March 27, 2023 12:14 PM

Why is Edward VIII dressed like Dumbledore?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 274March 27, 2023 12:34 PM

Photo of Edward VIII and Lord Mountbatten.

The jokes just write themselves with this picture.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 275March 27, 2023 12:36 PM

They will attend. They are getting no clicks. Harry having to do 'Car Shows' for vets to try & clean up his image. People asking to see his visa app. Did he lie?

The RF their only ace. They can always dine off victim mode again for a bit. Hope they have great financial advisors for the cash they do have.

Better watch the people whose cash they seem to wash at certain points. If they think the Royals are meanies, they ain't seen nothin' yet, if they try to cross those folk.

by Anonymousreply 276March 27, 2023 1:36 PM

Meanwhile, Hapless Harry is in London.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 277March 27, 2023 1:42 PM

Gawd, he needs to get his staff to delete the photos that make him look like a low grade moron..Oh wait, impossible task. Well at least he has learned how to close his mouth & get his tongue back inside before he does close his mouth.

Too bad Diana couldn't tuck him away like Queen Mary did with Prince John.

by Anonymousreply 278March 27, 2023 1:57 PM

Reportedly Harry won't be seeing Charles or William while in London. LOL

by Anonymousreply 279March 27, 2023 2:04 PM

[quote]Why is Edward VIII dressed like Dumbledore?

Apparently it's a "deer-stalking cloak "

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 280March 27, 2023 2:18 PM

His face is puffy and flushed in that photo at r277. Is he a big boozer as well as a druggie?

For all his talk of his contentment and his mental well-being, he has not really looked healthy for a long time now.

by Anonymousreply 281March 27, 2023 2:39 PM

R277 Good King Harry sorting it out.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 282March 27, 2023 3:45 PM

I laugh/snorted at the picture at r277, not because of the moronic look on H's face, but the bodyguards who look like cleaned up thugs from a Guy Ritchie movie.

[QUOTE]had provided “inside information” on the layout of Buckingham Palace. The Nazis bombed the palace in 1940 with several bombs hitting “family quarters”

Could this possibly be true? The information could probably have been easily obtained from servants by German spies who paid good money.

by Anonymousreply 283March 27, 2023 3:45 PM

My Great Grandfather was with Mountbatten in India. He said he was the only man he ever saw who wore nail polish. They referred to him as Mountbottom.

by Anonymousreply 284March 27, 2023 3:48 PM

I wonder if he flew into the UK by private jet?

by Anonymousreply 285March 27, 2023 3:51 PM

^ He hitchhiked you tiresome clot.

by Anonymousreply 286March 27, 2023 4:03 PM

The nutter Sussex Stan upthread referring to "King Pedo" has the all intellectual rigor of a rotting potato (and likely smells like one, too). About the expected level of functioning for a Glavset employee. Probably drinks on the job to get through the shift.

by Anonymousreply 287March 27, 2023 4:06 PM

The UK is "too dangerous to visit" but the US is perfectly safe, with its more guns than people.

by Anonymousreply 288March 27, 2023 4:14 PM

Damn. That video of Harry (from the back) on R277's link, entering the building....A huge, huge bald area on the top/back of his head.

Much too much to call it a "bald spot". There's more skin than hair (from the back).

by Anonymousreply 289March 27, 2023 4:20 PM

Apparently they don't want to socialize with him before the coronation, either:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 290March 27, 2023 6:21 PM


The King was too "busy" to meet with his son after the Duke of Sussex made a surprise visit to London to attend a High Court hacking case against a newspaper publisher.

The Duke of Sussex attended the hearing to throw his weight behind a legal claim against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail, over alleged phone hacking and misuse of private information.

Prince Harry flew commercial from California to London for the four-day preliminary hearing because he wanted to show his support, the Telegraph understands.

But he is not expected to see his father during his visit, despite making contact, because he was told he was busy.

The King is understood to be at Highgrove, in Gloucestershire, and neither the Prince and Princess of Wales nor their children are in London or Windsor because it is the school holidays, palace sources said.

The hearing was due to coincide with the King’s state visit to France before the trip was cancelled on Friday because of ongoing civil unrest and violence over Emmanuel Macron’s pension reforms.


So he was supposed to be away, finds himself suddenly at home, and is still too busy to see Harry.

by Anonymousreply 291March 27, 2023 6:22 PM

I guess they only take a private plane when Duchess D-List is traveling.

by Anonymousreply 292March 27, 2023 6:27 PM

Looks like the $50,000+ spent on hair plugs was a bust.

by Anonymousreply 293March 27, 2023 6:36 PM

R293 They bloody well were Dee.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 294March 27, 2023 7:23 PM

William has a decent shaped face/head to pull it off. I think Harry is going to look worse bald.

by Anonymousreply 295March 27, 2023 7:30 PM

[quote]His face is puffy and flushed in that photo at [R277]. Is he a big boozer as well as a druggie?

The Duke of S. is a loser

And I think he is a boozer...

by Anonymousreply 296March 27, 2023 9:25 PM

He doesn't look good R295. His head is too long and narrow. A round well-shaped head is needed to pull off bald.

by Anonymousreply 297March 27, 2023 9:31 PM

Why are William and Harry both bald?

Both Diana's side of the family and Charles' side of the family seem to have kept their hair into their 40's.

But William went bald in his 20's, and Harry in his 30's.

Charles on the other hand, still looked good as a young adult.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 298March 27, 2023 10:00 PM

Doesn't the baldness gene come down the female line?

Both Diana's sons clearly are stuck with that quality.

by Anonymousreply 299March 27, 2023 10:06 PM

I see Harry stumbled and ran into a photographer, instead he will probably play the victim and blame it on the paparazzi being out of control.

by Anonymousreply 300March 27, 2023 10:09 PM

William was so good looking as a teen, so it must be a come down for him. But Harry is going to end up looking like a clown. I read that Meghan makes him wear a hat outside to cover it.

by Anonymousreply 301March 27, 2023 10:11 PM

R301 Google: Clown

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 302March 27, 2023 11:51 PM

Who is the infantile Meghan Markle Stan who keeps posting pics ridiculing Charles? What's that in aid of you dimwit?

by Anonymousreply 303March 27, 2023 11:53 PM

I think William is still handsome. Baldness sucks but he looks so much like his mom. He’s a good looking guy.

by Anonymousreply 304March 28, 2023 12:01 AM

Just ignore them, R303. They get bored, take a break, then come back for more attention-seeking posts. It's a vicious circle, but fairly typical behaviour from Meghan fans.

by Anonymousreply 305March 28, 2023 12:10 AM

[QUOTE]and is still too busy to see Harry.

Who wouldn't be too busy talking prized flora at Highgrove rather than spending time with unreasonable, unworthy, treasonous vegetation?

by Anonymousreply 306March 28, 2023 12:48 AM

William is still attractive, but it's quite a decline from his peak hotness in his college years.

by Anonymousreply 307March 28, 2023 12:53 AM

Harry’s book threw a lot at the BRF, especially his father. Harry poked fun at his father’s exercises, second wife, insufficient demonstration of affection. He said he envisioned dropping an explosive on his father.

No wonder his father is busy.

by Anonymousreply 308March 28, 2023 12:56 AM

All of them had a brief window of hotness and then they descend into actual ugliness. It’s sad.

by Anonymousreply 309March 28, 2023 12:57 AM

The Windsor men all seem to be incredibly loyal and protective to their wives.

Harry is protective of his wife, but he seems SHOCKED! SHOCKED that Charles and William don't have open arms after the attacks on their wives.

by Anonymousreply 310March 28, 2023 12:59 AM

r310 Because he is emotionally stunted and stuck as a teenager.

by Anonymousreply 311March 28, 2023 1:02 AM

I think that Harry should read the signs and not attend the coronation.

For fuck's sake, he's in London by himself right now and neither his father nor his brother want anything to do with him.

So what makes him think that they want him at the coronation?

Get a fucking clue!

He just needs to move on with his life and accept that he has lost his father and brother.

And I'm not saying this to put blame on Harry. It's because his father and brother are fucking cunts.

But at some point you have to accept that the relationship with them is dead, and now he has to focus on Meghan and his two children.

by Anonymousreply 312March 28, 2023 4:52 AM

Harry and Meghan ‘clawing’ onto Royal Family to keep ‘glossy tiara’ brand.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 313March 28, 2023 5:37 AM

Wow, R313, that Australian reporter's voice and accent are like nails on a chalkboard - 'Harry's memwah' hahaha.

by Anonymousreply 314March 28, 2023 7:24 AM

Why in God's name would the royals WANT to socialise with two people who behaved as the Sussexes did?!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 315March 28, 2023 1:17 PM

Dear R312, no one who isn’t an unhinged Sussex stan buys that Harry and his harridan are victims.

by Anonymousreply 316March 28, 2023 5:31 PM

I'm sure Meghan will focus him on Meghan. Oh, and the two children, of course.

by Anonymousreply 317March 28, 2023 5:34 PM


by Anonymousreply 318March 28, 2023 10:29 PM

R318 welcome to the DL. Are Lipstick Alley and Celebitchy off on maintenance?

by Anonymousreply 319March 29, 2023 12:03 AM

Big Klan Granny stank today. Time for Deranger Fumigant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 320March 29, 2023 12:20 AM

" We give the Twit six months and the whole lot will go pear shaped."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 321March 29, 2023 12:26 AM

Why in God's name would the Sussexes WANT to socialize with two people who behaved as the royals did?!!!!!

Fixed for R315

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 322March 29, 2023 12:33 AM

R307 Lasix is quite affordable dear.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 323March 29, 2023 12:35 AM

I'm quite confused by the last five or six posts.

What's going on here?

Whose side are you even on?

Your posts make no sense.

by Anonymousreply 324March 29, 2023 1:05 AM

R311 "Emotionally stunted and stuck as a teenager" You call yourself "Surviving Angel". Self-awareness is a rare quality dear.

by Anonymousreply 325March 29, 2023 1:07 AM

R324 Stay calm and keep scrolling until you find !!! CAPS!!!

by Anonymousreply 326March 29, 2023 1:10 AM

First official portrait of the King.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 327March 29, 2023 2:09 AM

The young artist is very talented with likenesses.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 328March 29, 2023 2:13 AM

r325 You are definitely overpaid. I have a feeling that visiting the UK unnecessarily for this court hearing and choosing to be public about it rather than use the discrete sidedoor will backfire on Harry in one of his other court cases suing the home office for royal security .

by Anonymousreply 329March 29, 2023 12:21 PM

I hope someone can get a shot of his earpiece. You know Megan in in his ear at all times. No way this bellend could be figuring out what to say extemporaneously.

Also, it so interesting that since she made him juggle his bollicks outside the window they are having him don uber masc. persona. Too bad he put in writing about smearing Mommy's lip balm on his frozen todger. Doubt anyone will ever see him the same again. Damaged goods.

Uncle Ellie better watch what falls out his mouth in front of Harry. Wondered if El's support for them was based on some shit they have on El.

by Anonymousreply 330March 29, 2023 12:33 PM

Who is Uncle Ellie?

by Anonymousreply 331March 29, 2023 12:52 PM

Elton John.

by Anonymousreply 332March 29, 2023 12:53 PM

Ohhhhh, thank you!

by Anonymousreply 333March 29, 2023 12:55 PM

Charles & Camilla arrive in Germany.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 334March 29, 2023 2:51 PM

Every time he opens his mouth, he can't resist attacking his family. And I thought this trial was about the newspaper intrusions. Charles should cancel their invitation to the Coronation.

Prince Harry blasts the Palace today in court

"The Institution was without a doubt withholding information from me for a long time about NGN's phone hacking and that has only become clear in recent years as I have pursued my own claim with different legal advice and representation," he said.

Harry added: "It is not an exaggeration to say that the bubble burst in terms of what I knew in 2020 when I moved out of the United Kingdom."

"To this day, there are members of the Royal Family and friends of mine who may have been targeted by NGN and I have no idea whether they have or have not brought claims," he continued. "There was never any centralised discussion between us about who had brought claims as each office in the Institution is siloed. There is this misconception that we are all in constant communication with one another but that is not true."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 335March 29, 2023 2:57 PM

Who or what is NGN?

by Anonymousreply 336March 29, 2023 3:03 PM

Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers (NGN), which publishes the Sun.

by Anonymousreply 337March 29, 2023 3:08 PM

R329 You are definitely underpaid for the humor you provide us SurvivingComedyGold.

by Anonymousreply 338March 29, 2023 4:16 PM

R334 Back to Windsor's roots. Seig Heil Mein Charlie

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 339March 29, 2023 4:24 PM

Deranger Fumigant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 340March 29, 2023 4:31 PM

[quote] Why are William and Harry both bald? Both Diana's side of the family and Charles' side of the family seem to have kept their hair into their 40's.

Men on both sides of the family eventually lost their hair: Johnnie Spencer (Diana's dad) lost most of his before he died (see photo), Charles Spencer (her brother) is beginning to lose his, and of course Charles and Edward and Philip all found their hair thinning dramatically on the Windsor/Mountbatten side.

Most men lose their hair as they age. Hollywood celebrities fool us into thinking men do not, but they were toupees and have restorative surgeries most people do not have. British royals and aristocrats are pretty firm about not having hair surgery done--they consider it déclassé, and prefer to allow hair thinning and balding to occur naturally.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 341March 29, 2023 4:43 PM

R340 does endlessly posting bullshit thrill you, huh?

by Anonymousreply 342March 30, 2023 1:23 AM

Why do Sussex stans confuse posting trite, juvenile memes with having genuine wit? And they do it repetitively, much like a certain orange-hued ignoramus is compelled to tell the world he's really, actually a genius.

by Anonymousreply 343March 30, 2023 1:45 AM

Meghan's demented fangirls are demented.

by Anonymousreply 344March 30, 2023 3:37 AM

R343..It' very simple. it's called low IQ.

by Anonymousreply 345March 30, 2023 3:47 AM

I thought that posting memes was a teenagers thing? I wish those idiots posting them would fuck off away from here.

by Anonymousreply 346March 30, 2023 7:18 AM

I think we've all noticed that Meghan's and Harry's fans tend to be pretty stupid and juvenile. I don't think it's surprising, though; anyone with even half a functioning brain can see that wherever the Sussexes go, and whatever they do, chaos ensues. If you support H+M, you out yourself as a dickhead.

by Anonymousreply 347March 30, 2023 8:53 AM

R347, did you fail logic and debate in HS?

Please, that was rhetorical. No reply necessary.

by Anonymousreply 348March 30, 2023 10:40 AM

R348 has proved my point perfectly.

by Anonymousreply 349March 30, 2023 11:19 AM

The funny thing is Meagain's sad fangurls behave exactly opposite to all the bullshit she spouts. I suppose in their fantasies Meagain invites them to her big tract house and they play with each other's weaves but if she walked her talk, she wouldn't let them past the gate. Which of course she wouldn't, but for different reasons.

by Anonymousreply 350March 30, 2023 12:19 PM

I really think Harry is certifiable at this point. Here he is again, blaming the "institution", that is to say, the BRF for "hiding" from him the hacking story. Some of these occurred when he was more than 25 years old, so he is basically stating that he was incapable of picking up a newspaper himself - in other words, that as a grown man, insisting that he was totally dependent on the monarchy for everything he knew about the world. Therefore, the statute shouldn't apply to him.

It's an incredibly shoddy excuse, and it comes barely five weeks before the coronation to which he has been invited. Then people wonder at the King's and Prince of Wales's refusal to see Harry whilst here for his court case. And why the other royals don't want to socialise with the Harkles.

Journalist Vanessa Georgiadis has written a piece about Meghan. Georgiadis is a friend of the (black female) journalist for THE CUT whose interview with Meghan showed Nutmeg in a light that neither Nutmeg nor the magazine liked. It was brilliantly done - the journalist simply let Meghan hoist herself with her own petard.

One of the things that Georgiadis states, in agreement with the THE CUT journo, is that Meghan evidences only a tenuous relationship with objective reality.

It's a trait Meghan shares with her stans, who are currently circulating a petition urging King Charles at the coronation to hand the Queen's crown to Meghan "to preserve the sanctity of the monarchy". The stunning ignorance and complete obliviousness to "objective reality" which, quite interestingly, reflects their idol's problem.

You couldn't make it up.

Meanwhile, I believe a partial guest list for the coronation has been released. So far, the Harkles aren't on it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 351March 30, 2023 1:35 PM

^*Grigoriadis (not Georgiadis)

by Anonymousreply 352March 30, 2023 1:36 PM

R351 Suck it up Dedranger loons.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 353March 30, 2023 3:23 PM

Ha ha - 3rd place is Kate at 6.6% compared to Harry's 8.8%.

I don't think William's 47.5% is in much danger of being overtaken.

by Anonymousreply 354March 30, 2023 5:41 PM

Transylvanian Royalty

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 355March 30, 2023 6:22 PM

^ Bitch stole my act

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 356March 30, 2023 6:57 PM

Charles just addressed the Bundestag in fluent German.

by Anonymousreply 357March 30, 2023 8:27 PM

His mother, father, and the Queen Mother all spoke fluent Germany.

by Anonymousreply 358March 30, 2023 8:32 PM

They must exhausted. Like Roxane Whatserface NYT exhausted.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 359March 30, 2023 9:32 PM

I've never heard the Queen Mother spoke German and why would she? Both parents were English.

by Anonymousreply 360March 30, 2023 9:51 PM

^It is his mother's tongue.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 361March 31, 2023 5:21 AM

Considering the Windsors were Saxe-Coburg-Gothas until 1917 it's not surprising the Queen Mother learned to speak German. Most people in that social realm spoke two or more languages.

by Anonymousreply 362March 31, 2023 6:02 AM

The article that r351 references is based on an interview with the writer in a podcast called On The Edge with Andrew Gold. It’s a good listen. The writer points out that the initial fascination with MM was trying to suss out how she, an obscure actress on a cable show, met Harry. Soho House? London? Their story kept changing. There was very little mention of her ethnicity at first because no one watched her show.

Also MM was well known at a certain (basic) level in H’wood because she was a tenacious networker, she and first husband, and she really hustled.

What I didn’t know was that when the story of their dating broke, a woman tabloid reporter moved down to Mexico to “befriend” Pa Markle. That’s as far as I’ve gotten in the podcast.

by Anonymousreply 363March 31, 2023 12:04 PM

R360, during her childhood she was educated by her German Jewish governess, who, if I remember correctly, taught her German. Her governess had to return to Germany at the onset of WWI. Between that and the war in general, the Queen Mother forever loathed Germany and never spoke German again, at least not publicly. I'm sure WWII only reinforced her sentiments.

by Anonymousreply 364March 31, 2023 12:39 PM

R363, I've had a crush on Andrew Gold after coming across his YouTube channel two months ago. He seems to explore an interesting niche of cults and narcs, focusing a lot on Scientology. His guests and interviews are usually very interesting and thoughtful. Alas, he is straight.

by Anonymousreply 365March 31, 2023 1:17 PM

R360 The Queen Mother didn't speak German fluently. However, she did speak French fluently and learned quite a bit of German from a German nanny the family employed early on, before WWI broke out, by which time the then Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was 14 years old.

by Anonymousreply 366March 31, 2023 1:22 PM

R358 The Queen didn't speak fluent German. Philip's sisters all married Germans, and he may or may not have picked up enough in his wanderings from one household to another after leaving Greece, but I don't know about "fluent". "Fluent" means something very specific, and a smattering of a second language is a far different matter from fluent. The Queen did speak quite good French, as her mother did. Speaking French was considered a necessity for well-born young women of the Queen's and the Queen Mother's day. The Queen Mother was able to speak French on her first state visit to France as Queen after the Abdication, which accounted for some of the wild adulation the new King and Queen received in France, along with the Queen's all-white mourning clothes for her recently deceased mother.

Say what you like, but they had class back then. Harry and Meghan are trash beside George VI and his wife. William and Kate are throwbacks to them. Harry and Meghan are throwbacks to Edward and Wallis.

by Anonymousreply 367March 31, 2023 1:27 PM

R366, thanks for the clarifications.

- R360

by Anonymousreply 368March 31, 2023 1:36 PM

One thing Kate and the Queen Mother have in common is happy families. The Bowes-Lyon clan was famously content in each other's company and a lot of fun. They both brought a kind of family life to their husbands that they missed in their own lives.

by Anonymousreply 369March 31, 2023 2:06 PM

R357 Deutsch blood is thicker than water.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 370March 31, 2023 4:51 PM

I had more relatives at Harry's wedding than the bride

by Anonymousreply 371March 31, 2023 5:13 PM

Princess of Wales, I think most people did.

by Anonymousreply 372March 31, 2023 5:19 PM

Me too!

by Anonymousreply 373March 31, 2023 5:22 PM

R369 and a happy close family was definitely not provided by the Spencer clan.

The Shands are a close bunch, IIRC.

by Anonymousreply 374March 31, 2023 5:32 PM


by Anonymousreply 375March 31, 2023 8:49 PM

[quote]Royals "Don't Want to Socialize" with Sussexes at Coronation

I, for one, was expecting sloppy group sex.

by Anonymousreply 376March 31, 2023 8:51 PM

Is there any other kind of group sex?

by Anonymousreply 377March 31, 2023 8:56 PM

Fuck implied, I want it guaranteed.

by Anonymousreply 378March 31, 2023 8:58 PM

[post redacted because independent.co.uk thinks that links to their ridiculous rag are a bad thing. Somebody might want to tell them how the internet works. Or not. We don't really care. They do suck though. Our advice is that you should not click on the link and whatever you do, don't read their truly terrible articles.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 379March 31, 2023 9:01 PM

Daily Deranger Fumigant

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 380March 31, 2023 9:06 PM

^ But we still charge admission

by Anonymousreply 381March 31, 2023 9:06 PM

Deplorables & Derangers different sides of the same vile coin.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 382March 31, 2023 9:53 PM

Wow. I looked at that guy Ian's twitterfeed. 100% either he's working as Meghan's publicist or she should have a restraining order on him. Creepy. He must work for that Bouzy guy.

by Anonymousreply 383April 1, 2023 5:00 PM

At the State dinner during the royal visit to Germany this week, Camilla wore the Queen's Mum's Greville tiara and the late Queen's fringe diamond necklace (for the first time). Recently, she also wore the late monarch's diamond and sapphire tiara. Camilla is opening the royal jewel vault slowly but surely.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 384April 1, 2023 5:17 PM

^ Queen Mum's

by Anonymousreply 385April 1, 2023 5:17 PM

I can't wait to see Kate's coronet!!!

by Anonymousreply 386April 1, 2023 6:25 PM

R383 Posting from the windmills of her mind.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 387April 1, 2023 6:36 PM

You stans know it’s possible to be liberal AND think the Sussexes are full of shit?

They’re a fun soap opera to laugh at.

by Anonymousreply 388April 1, 2023 7:03 PM

What is progressive about a dimwitted princeling and a failed starlet?

by Anonymousreply 389April 1, 2023 7:51 PM

What is progressive about two nasty adulterous old gits?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 390April 1, 2023 7:56 PM

Guest my RSVP got lost in the mail mate.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 391April 2, 2023 1:20 AM

It would seem Eugenie would be VERY happy to socialize with the Sussexes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 392April 2, 2023 4:19 AM

R392 Pakistani News: always first with the scoops!!

by Anonymousreply 393April 2, 2023 5:51 AM

Deranger Fumigant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 394April 2, 2023 6:15 AM

R365 I enjoy Andrew Gold’s YouTube. Andrew interviewed HG Tudor.

by Anonymousreply 395April 2, 2023 6:50 AM

R392 You did see the question mark after that headline? Did you read the article, which, as usual, was spun out of air and totally devoid of evidence or proof, and featured solely conjecture and guesswork?

Pss Eugenie, again resident at Ivy Cottage on the grounds of Kensington Palace, lives in a "Grace an Favour" residence that she enjoys access to strictly at the pleasure of King Charles, and she hosts Harry without so much as a by your leave, especially given that the security forces around it would have to have been notified?

And that the place would be the first one the media would surround given Eugenie's extremely foolish advertising of her alliance with the Sussexes?

I rather think not.

It is likely that by "friends", Harry parked himself with people whose names and addresses aren't so well known to the press, and well away from royal scrutiny, given that Buck House and Clarence House are a stone's throw away.

I don't understand why people look at shit like this in the media and believe it.

by Anonymousreply 396April 2, 2023 1:21 PM

Coronation breakfast sausages.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 397April 2, 2023 5:24 PM

The majority of the brf stans are white, homophobic, racist fraucunts though R388. If you block them and read their other comments they are all deplorables.

R387, you must be easily amused. Can't believe anyone would watch that garbage.

by Anonymousreply 398April 2, 2023 5:32 PM

[quote]Harry and the cretin he married are huge laughingstocks here in the U.S. they are constantly mocked.

Actually, most of us here in the US don't really think of them one way or the other. I don't know anyone who even talks about them. Watching Gutfeld? Really? Oh no, you don't have an agenda at all do you, magaT?

by Anonymousreply 399April 2, 2023 6:15 PM

R398 the majority of the Markle fangirls are obese, middle-aged, homophobic black women living vicariously through a bitch who wouldn't give them the time of day.

by Anonymousreply 400April 2, 2023 6:34 PM

The Queen's Canopy has come to a close. What a wonderful legacy to leave behind.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 401April 2, 2023 6:54 PM

Father and Son plant the last tree as part of the Queen's Green Canopy initiative.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 402April 2, 2023 6:56 PM

R400, you forgot diabetic, functionally literate and paid by the hour, if employed.

by Anonymousreply 403April 2, 2023 7:08 PM

R403 on Twitter there are literally 100s of these Meghan fangurl accounts. They tweet about nothing but kissing Meghan's ass or trashing the royal family. That's it. They have no other interest in life according to their twitter feeds. Are these troll farm accounts? If these are actual people - which I doubt - I do hope they're paid trolls. Otherwise Meghan should get a restraining order on them.

by Anonymousreply 404April 2, 2023 7:16 PM

[quote}her stans, who are currently circulating a petition urging King Charles at the coronation to hand the Queen's crown to Meghan "to preserve the sanctity of the monarchy".

I think her "stans" and this rumor are totally fabricated and anyone who believes it is a fucking total moron. No one could repeat this with a straight face.

by Anonymousreply 405April 2, 2023 7:46 PM

R405 April Fools

by Anonymousreply 406April 2, 2023 7:53 PM

Late with Deranger Fumigant . We can breathe now.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 407April 3, 2023 4:46 AM

R400 You hood is showing gran.

by Anonymousreply 408April 3, 2023 5:29 AM

Certified marriage counselor and toe sucker weighs in on the Harkles .

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 409April 3, 2023 1:32 PM

Charlie, Kate and Willy looking splendid!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 410April 3, 2023 1:50 PM

R404, would there be wrath when they too are discarded or just bewilderment?

by Anonymousreply 411April 3, 2023 1:55 PM

Is Kate the tree r410?

by Anonymousreply 412April 3, 2023 1:55 PM

^ Rubbish . Tree is too zaftig for Katie.

by Anonymousreply 413April 3, 2023 1:58 PM

410, I'm sure you feel like you're doing a lot of clever work but if you're trying to get under our skin with those pics, you've got a lot of work to do.

They're just dumb. Not funny, not clever, not insulting, without imagination or wit or subtext. Nothing. Just dumb.

by Anonymousreply 414April 3, 2023 2:04 PM

^ No. The tree has too much charisma.

by Anonymousreply 415April 3, 2023 2:05 PM

R410 How it's done.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 416April 3, 2023 2:31 PM

R405 I saw the petition and the plea of the poster to sign it. The spelling and grasp of English (not to mention grasp of constitutional monarchical power and the lack thereof) suggest one of Meghan's fans "abroad" - China, The Netherlands, South America . . .

Or, if you really want to go tinfoil hat, a very clever sting painting Meghan's fangurls as imbecilic, as a form of shade thrown at Meghan.

Frankly, the language does look like some of the foreign comments lauding her as a future Queen of England (they've never heard of Great Britain) below the line in places like the DM.

But that it caused wide ranging hilarity is not in doubt. Particularly the spelling, "Dutchess".

I blame the social media universe which allows people to group together in their own cyber countries and feed each other fairy-tales that they can all enjoy because they don't let anyone in who can disabuse those fantasies with the truth.

But it is a bit frightening . . . if these are people and not bots, you have to consider that they're raising children, voting, sitting on juries . . .

by Anonymousreply 417April 3, 2023 5:15 PM

According to their published accounts, Harry and Meghan paid $325K last year to a media consultant who used to work for Hillary Clinton. So this is how they hope to control the narrative on social media to paint themselves as heroic victims?

by Anonymousreply 418April 3, 2023 5:52 PM

I still don't understand what Meghan's end-game is. Does she just want to be an ueber-celebrity or does she want to get a movie career? Is she trying to play royal in California? Their goals seem very confused.

by Anonymousreply 419April 3, 2023 6:32 PM

R409 well if anyone knows about a fairy tale romance!!

by Anonymousreply 420April 3, 2023 7:04 PM

Turn those frowns upside down R417 & R418

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 421April 3, 2023 7:17 PM

Meg loves to wear white as well. Shows off her svelte figure with its teeny, tiny waist.

by Anonymousreply 422April 3, 2023 8:58 PM

^ and your pointy pointy head Gran

by Anonymousreply 423April 3, 2023 9:08 PM

It's the number one nighttime talk show r399.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 424April 4, 2023 6:47 AM

She doesn't have a waist r422. She's barrel shaped. She really has the most unfortunate figure.

by Anonymousreply 425April 4, 2023 6:48 AM

She must have starved herself when working on Suits.

by Anonymousreply 426April 4, 2023 2:35 PM

Her old man is getting his revenge through genetics.

Well, she always did want to be as big as Oprah when she grew up.

by Anonymousreply 427April 4, 2023 2:47 PM

Former PM of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, has joined The Earthshot Prize Board of Trustees.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 428April 4, 2023 5:02 PM

^ So, who cares about that shitty ole former PM of NZ. Madea bought us a gospel choir & the Pope of LA baptized Lilabucks.

by Anonymousreply 429April 5, 2023 1:18 AM

A new photo of Charles and Camilla, the Coronation invitation and details of the pages.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 430April 5, 2023 8:51 PM

This is obviously a stupid American speaking or a Wog communist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 431April 6, 2023 3:26 AM

R431 she's a KHive American and knows jack shit about Brits. I suspected the KHive had converted to Meghanism.

by Anonymousreply 432April 6, 2023 4:06 AM

What happened to the thread about MM receiving an award? I didn't read the whole thread, so I don't know why it was deleted.

by Anonymousreply 433April 6, 2023 3:35 PM

The King and Queen attended the Royal Maundy Service at York Minster. Camilla looks good in navy & white.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 434April 6, 2023 3:45 PM

R434 You can make payments dear

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 435April 6, 2023 4:55 PM

Maybe Muriel has put a limit on how many markle/brf threads can go at one time R433. The obsessed klan grannies are tiresome as hell.

by Anonymousreply 436April 6, 2023 5:16 PM

I think a thread disappears or gets flagged for deletion if it gets enough F&F votes. Presumably over at Pepsi Central they all gang up and fly in to click. Exhausted, they return to drink more Pepsi.

by Anonymousreply 437April 6, 2023 5:22 PM

Our beloved QUEEN CAMILLA looks breathtaking beautiful today. That Wog girl couldn't hold a candle to her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 438April 6, 2023 5:41 PM

Just watched one of those 3-minute Neil Sean videos, and he seemed certain about his scoop that Harry was househunting in London - and the Mrs wasn't too happy about it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 439April 7, 2023 4:19 AM

"Cable TV Actress" LOL!!! She would get even more attention in the UK than she does now. You'd think she'd relish that. She may not even have to call the paps like she does now!

by Anonymousreply 440April 7, 2023 4:24 AM

‘Absolutely furious’: Harry and Meghan denied balcony access at coronation.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 441April 8, 2023 2:27 AM

The Sussexes are not going to Pa and his Side Piece's Circus along with 53% of Brits. Giving those tired a old gits a big FU. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 442April 8, 2023 3:33 AM

[Quote] How much will the coronation of King Charles cost?

[Quote]The Operation Golden Orb committee, which is planning the ceremony, reportedly estimated that King Charles III's Coronation to cost £100million, although this hasn't been confirmed. Meanwhile, the ceremony for Queen Elizabeth II is estimated to have cost a total of £1.57million, the equivalent of £46million today.Mar 9, 2023. /the Mirror

I thought he wanted to downscale the coronation, hmm. Just lip service?

by Anonymousreply 443April 8, 2023 5:35 AM

I wonder if this coronation wasn't rushed. It doesn't sound very interesting or very original, it's best known at this point for trying to do it on the cheap. As an example they've cut the procession route by about 2/3 what it was for the Queen. It is a moment in history. Respectable crowds could have been expected. Brits are drawn to the pageantry. I think they've overtalked in what little they've said. They should have waited. Let a year pass between the death of the Queen and the coronation. Done it in September or even early October, when the weather is still pretty good. May can be cold and wet (though climate change may have changed it. I was over once in mid-May, in the last ten years, and it was in the eighties.)

It's all so staid and the same. Big church service with the new usual mix of people of colour charity worker, small parade, six people on the balcony, rock concert. Where's the massive public fireworks events the night before or the night of the Coronation? Why not open the palaces you can (like Windsor) for free for the day, give the people who can't afford and can never afford the 50 pounds admission? Is he making a speech to the country and Commonwealth the night of (he may well be.) Why not a special Coronation exhibit at the National Portrait Gallery, the V&A, etc. etc. There's tons of stuff never sees the light of day (paintings, furniture, jewels, historic clothing worn by dead royals) that could have been mounted to create a real splash, a sense of connection with the monarchy, and put the focus on creating a memory in the people whose support you need to keep the whole show on the road.

The monarchy seems barely able to try anything different. What's coming up sounds like... last year and the year before that. Where's the creativity? Where's the emotion? They've got the formula backward. It should be about the King and his people, not the King and his Coronation.

by Anonymousreply 444April 8, 2023 12:43 PM

Great ideas R444. You should be on the planning committee!

by Anonymousreply 445April 8, 2023 5:20 PM

I saw a video that said 15 on the balcony. KCIII and QC, Will, Kate, their 3 kids, Anne & husband, Edward & Sophie, and two elderly couples whose titles I can never remember - Gloucester or something?

by Anonymousreply 446April 8, 2023 5:34 PM

Louse and James - Children of Edward and Sophie

Duke and Duchess of Gloucester

Duke and Duchess of Kent ?

Princess Alexandra of Kent ?

Prince Michael of Kent?

by Anonymousreply 447April 8, 2023 5:40 PM

^ Obviously that should have been "Louise".

Sorry about that misspelling. I like her and wish her well.

by Anonymousreply 448April 8, 2023 5:43 PM

Queen Elizabeth was a fresh young woman with a whole life ahead of her.

Charles has lived his sordid life in public view and has consistently shamed the monarchy.

What was the coronation of Silly Billy like, the last placeholder to be crowned?

by Anonymousreply 449April 8, 2023 6:58 PM

Today in Birmingham, The Prince of Wales and his older son Prince George of Wales attended a Premier League match between Aston Villa and Nottingham Forest at Villa Park.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 450April 8, 2023 7:58 PM

Charles should give up the throne to William. He's old, ugly and uninteresting. No one cares about him and his coronation.

by Anonymousreply 451April 8, 2023 9:21 PM

R450 pictures...

I think George looks like Queen Elizabeth II's father.

by Anonymousreply 452April 8, 2023 10:18 PM

R452, I have long thought so too... I thought he was all Michael Middleton but those Windsor genes will out.

by Anonymousreply 453April 8, 2023 11:08 PM

Charles needs to man up!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 454April 9, 2023 1:06 AM

YOU'RE ISOLATED! Nacho Figueras Cleared Harry Out All Polo Matches From April To October: Cut Ties.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 455April 9, 2023 2:24 AM

Gotta start buying this stuff by the gallon. Deranger Fumigant sprayed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 456April 9, 2023 2:45 AM

Extended royal family at Easter, even Andrew and Bay-triss.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 457April 9, 2023 1:39 PM

Happy Easter Perp Walk

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 458April 9, 2023 2:20 PM

Wow, Kate looks awesome in that royal blue outfit.

by Anonymousreply 459April 9, 2023 4:50 PM

Kate's a woman who's maturing beautifully into her looks. Most women don't... aging oddly seems to suit her. Her bone structure is strong, imposing.

by Anonymousreply 460April 9, 2023 5:39 PM

These people are bejeweled scum.

by Anonymousreply 461April 9, 2023 5:40 PM

So better than you and with jewels.

by Anonymousreply 462April 9, 2023 5:45 PM

I'm genuinely surprised Charles hasn't read the room and banished his brother. The public hated Andrew BEFORE his scandal.

by Anonymousreply 463April 9, 2023 5:54 PM

I think today was a signal he's at the coronation as a member of the family.

by Anonymousreply 464April 9, 2023 6:13 PM

It's Easter and klan kunts can't let it rest for one fucking day? These bitches must roll out of bed and go straight for BRF asslicking and Markle hating gossip.

by Anonymousreply 465April 9, 2023 6:24 PM

R463, you can’t banish someone from a church service. I would prefer that the man was behind bars but he isn’t so he will always appear at events like this where nobody else has any say.

by Anonymousreply 466April 9, 2023 6:29 PM

R466 no but you can say "you're not welcome with us". He's in the middle of the pack, with Anne.

by Anonymousreply 467April 9, 2023 6:39 PM

Charlie can't boot pedo bro because he's being blackmailed. Andrew will write a book that would make Harry's look like a love letter.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 468April 9, 2023 7:11 PM

Happy Easter from our Happy Family to yours.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 469April 9, 2023 7:15 PM

R441 More bullcocca. The Harkles have known for a very long time that they will never set foot on that balcony again unless Harry has led a coup and deposed his father and/or his brother.

They aren't shocked, they aren't surprised, and they've known since the Platinum Jubilee debacle that whilst they've landed a few punches, they've lost the war. They're out and they know it. They never expected to be on that balcony.

This is a formal State and religious occasion, not a big party. If they didn't get onto the balcony during the Jubly, they had to know they weren't getting on it after everything they did and said after the Jubly.

No apology, no balcony, no Trooping the Colour, no Grace and Favour residence, no Remembrance Day appearances, no future Jublees for Papa. If they attend, this is their last appearance of this kind looking like they're actually part of the royal scene, except possibly for Charles' funeral. And as William will be King by then, he'll make sure only Harry is invited, and that Meghan isn't there. And if Harry won't come without Meghan, tant pis, as they French say.

It's unbelievable how much pot-stirring the media are getting out of this bullshit.

It's like when JFK Jr. disappeared. I saw a cartoon of a couple of fish talking to each other, one was saying, "Where were you when you realised they had nothing new to report on it?"

by Anonymousreply 470April 9, 2023 7:15 PM

Why would you want to even be near someone you can't trust not to repeat and probably MIS repeat everything you might say?

They shouldn't attend. They've made it clear in action and in word that they do not wish the royal family or King Charles or William well.

Maybe in 10 years or so they can try to reconcile but not in the midst of an ongoing hate campaign against Harry's family.

by Anonymousreply 471April 9, 2023 7:16 PM

My friend Julie told Meghan and Harry that the perfect coronation gift for Camilla and Charles would be a box of tampons (unused of course!) and a DVD of Nicholas and Alexandra. Julie is such a cunt.

by Anonymousreply 472April 9, 2023 7:17 PM

R469 A decent Royal Family . No need for a balcony.

by Anonymousreply 473April 9, 2023 7:17 PM

The only ones waging a hate campaign, dear, are the Harkles.

by Anonymousreply 474April 9, 2023 7:18 PM

R463 Andrew, like it or not, is still the King's brother and holds the title of both Prince and Duke. He lives a stone's throw from Windsor Castle, and he has two daughters (soon to be) three grandchildren who live in England. He's still a UK citizen and as a peer owes fealty to his brother. This is a religious service.

Harry has committed High Treason several times over. Andrew has disgraced the family escutcheon, but he hasn't actually committed a crime. Harry has, technically: trying to undermine a direct heir to the throne is still on the books as High Treason.

If the King isn't banishing his traitorous son from the service, banning Andrew is not in the cards. Either both or neither. As it is, Andrew has been completely marginalised. It's enough.

by Anonymousreply 475April 9, 2023 7:20 PM

Why would Harry and Meghan want to be seen with these criminal pedo freaks? To doge eggs on a balcony? They'll stay home in America. Smart move.

by Anonymousreply 476April 9, 2023 7:21 PM

^Oh, and Andrew was never convicted of a crime, please do remember that.

Harry could be tried for high treason just like the nutjob who got into BP with the intention of taking out the Queen with a crossbow.

by Anonymousreply 477April 9, 2023 7:22 PM

R475 mmm, is it though? And while I think they're both pieces of shit, I think a poll would show that Andrew is far less welcome with the public than Harry.

The monarchy lives and dies by public opinion. He was a hated asshole before his sex scandal. Give him the boot, Chuck.

by Anonymousreply 478April 9, 2023 7:23 PM

Happy Easter from the Royal Bunny

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 479April 9, 2023 7:26 PM

The hardest egg I ever laid.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 480April 9, 2023 7:33 PM

r475 thinks it is a real-life Lion in Winter. Have fun. King Kotex is the end of the line.

by Anonymousreply 481April 9, 2023 7:43 PM

Harry has done his best. He produced his series which trashed his family. He did his interviews where he made it clear that he believed that his family were not racist and that his wife was wrong to insinuate that they were. He destroyed whatever privacy his father and brother could reasonably have expected to have, by discussing their private lives in excruciating detail. And he opened himself up to ridicule with his stories of necklaces and his todger and mummy’s cream.

Harry has made his cash, but what is his next move?

He has done his best to do his worst, but in 3 weeks King Charles will be crowned, with his wife by his side, as he has always wanted. Despite Harold’s attacks, they are both fairly popular and William and Kate are even more appreciated. Today’s Windsor appearance at the Easter service just highlights how irrelevant the Sussexes have become to the Royal Family. The show has gone on without them..

by Anonymousreply 482April 9, 2023 8:48 PM

It never ceases to amaze me how Brits always have a group to blame for the dwindling interest in their archaic monarchy but the monarchy itself. By their repeated amoral behavior over the years the Windsors "trashed" themselves.

by Anonymousreply 483April 9, 2023 9:55 PM

R482 The curtain came down on their hoary old show on September 8, 2022. The audience is leaving the theatre. The actors will realize this on May 6. They may have to find another gig.

by Anonymousreply 484April 9, 2023 9:57 PM

I don't really think they care R482 as none of us do.

by Anonymousreply 485April 9, 2023 10:07 PM

R485, who exactly is “us” ? You shouldn’t even be on this thread since you clearly have no interest, so fuck off.

I think the Sussexes care very much. Why won’t they respond to a simple RSVP — their attention-seeking coyness is very telling.

by Anonymousreply 486April 9, 2023 10:34 PM

Coyness? It couldn't be more obvious if you squeezed it and pus hit the mirror.

by Anonymousreply 487April 9, 2023 10:56 PM

Meghan loves Hollywood pedo freaks. She was buddies with Epsteins girlfriend and yachted with her and her sank krew.

by Anonymousreply 488April 10, 2023 2:58 AM

[quote] The only ones waging a hate campaign, dear, are the Harkles.

Mea culpa. Sorry I was unclear. By Harry's family I meant the Royal Family. I didn't mean the Harkles.

by Anonymousreply 489April 10, 2023 3:19 AM

R478 You don't seem to understand that his mother and brother DID give Andrew the boot.

But preventing him from attending the highest religious celebration in the Christian calendar with his family is an absurd demand.

He's lost his HRH, he's been deprived of any public role despite pleas to Charles from both Andrew's daughters . . .

He's gotten the boot. If nothing will satisfy you but his head on a pike over Tower Gate and never to be seen in public with his blood family again, I'm afraid you're doomed to disappointment.

Meanwhile, Harry has committed an actual crime, for which, of course, he will never be prosecuted, and done absolutely everything he can to damage the institutions whose bennies he still takes hearty advantage of.

It is true that the polls show a lower opinion of Andrew than the Sussexes. But the polls for the Sussexes are hardly promising - in fact, what is usually, and correctly, pointed out, is that ONLY Andrew ranks lower than the Sussexes in the polls.

It's really a photo finish. Collectively, the three are the most hated and despised royals in Britain.

And in America, the polls for the Sussexes are STILL below that of William and Kate.

by Anonymousreply 490April 10, 2023 1:27 PM

R490 Keep telling yourself that dear. 1.43 million Willy & Kate fans can't be wrong. LOL

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 491April 10, 2023 4:47 PM

Prince Harry and Meghan “Were HUGE Spenders!” - Angela Levin On Royal Book Bombshells.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 492April 10, 2023 9:20 PM

R492 Sure Gran

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 493April 10, 2023 9:37 PM

But is it egg proof?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 494April 10, 2023 9:44 PM

R439, those 3 minute Neil Sean videos are somehow exhausting. I don't know if it is his monotone delivery or his way of talking in circles, but I find him unwatchable.

by Anonymousreply 495April 11, 2023 1:20 AM

Palace releases Official Coronation Emoji !

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 496April 12, 2023 2:53 AM

Harry is attending the Coronation. Meghan is staying home with the kids.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 497April 12, 2023 3:08 PM

She should no longer use the title.

by Anonymousreply 498April 12, 2023 3:17 PM

Harry is doing his duty as he always has. He's protecting his wife and children from the vile circus. Only there for 90 minutes he'll be back in California to watch Archie blow out his birthday candles. It's a big win for the Sussex brand The optics will be great for him. He'll be the only one the media focuses on. Even wearing his pajamas he'd upstage that pathetic lot. Show them what a real King looks like.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 499April 12, 2023 4:00 PM

r499 Nonsense They has their PE machine briefing the press why they should be allowed on the balcony for a cute family moment . They wanted to go and have been in negotiations for months. They didnt get what they wanted so she ain't coming. If she really thought of the institution and its members what you claim is the reality then she would NEVER have accepted titles for her kids .

by Anonymousreply 500April 12, 2023 9:22 PM

Normally their dumb announcements come from Peg in the Archewell Comms department. This time it was BP. Wonder what BP cut off at the pass.

by Anonymousreply 501April 12, 2023 9:49 PM

R500 SurvivingAnal indeed.

by Anonymousreply 502April 13, 2023 12:51 AM

This lady deserves a medal for her work at the Abbey.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 503April 13, 2023 3:20 PM

R503 This lady deserves a medal for her work too and it's cheaper.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 504April 13, 2023 4:49 PM

The way that woman says "chair" is so fucking annoying.

by Anonymousreply 505April 13, 2023 6:59 PM

I bet King Chuck breaks the chair with his fat arse.

by Anonymousreply 506April 13, 2023 7:31 PM

R506 King Charles has a great body for a 75 year old.

by Anonymousreply 507April 14, 2023 10:10 AM

Speaking of Charles...he was at Sandhurst today with King Abdullah of Jordan and Grand Duke Henri of Luxembourg. I think he's aged five years since the Queen's death.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 508April 14, 2023 9:31 PM

^ Physically . Psychologically he's a spry 12 yo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 509April 14, 2023 10:51 PM

The Charles hating troll appears to be retarded.

by Anonymousreply 510April 14, 2023 11:26 PM

I don't hate Charles. He's got his faults but he seems to care deeply about Britain, and I agree with many of his values. But my God, all decked out in their royal regalia, Charles and Camilla do look like motheaten old teddy bears.

by Anonymousreply 511April 14, 2023 11:45 PM

The retarded will be suing for slander, R510.

by Anonymousreply 512April 14, 2023 11:52 PM


Charles Dumps Camilla for someone more "Empathetic" !

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 513April 15, 2023 1:43 AM

He's certainly loyal to Camilla. He respects her, he didn't respect Diana it seems she annoyed him.

by Anonymousreply 514April 15, 2023 2:01 PM

I think the whole thing is quite interesting historically, regardless of whether I "like" or don't like any of the actors. It's the broad overview that's interesting.

There's no argument that Charles is coming in on the back foot. His moment may be at hand in practical terms, but on some other plane, his moment really has passed. I believe that from his catastrophically misconceived marriage has flowed outcomes that are reshaping the monarchy outside of social trends and shifts.

Had Charles made a happy marriage, I wonder if the Queen would have considered stepping aside for him 15 years earlier, citing infirmity and increasing frailty. But, apart from her own promise at eighteen, I believe that bringing Charles and Camilla in without giving Camilla time to earn at least the grudging respect of the public was a non-starter. It's taken nearly two decades for Camilla just to reach this point.

I also think Camilla Tominey's article in the Telegraph a couple of days ago, with a marked shift toward Harry (but not Meghan) suggests that she's gotten talking points from the Palace, a balloon raised to test the waters. Tominey's apparent softening of her previously ruthless reporting on both Sussexes seems capricious, at best. Most interestingly, Tominey leaves the Bitch Meghan flag fluttering in the breeze, but cunningly raises the Poor Harry banner.

The column contains some remarkably and unintentionally hilarious lines, one referring to Harry's "brilliance" as a soldier: a characterisation that no one, anywhere, has ever asserted, least of all the COs who had to babysit him. He couldn't even pass the major's exam.

The other interesting bit is that the column appears to want to highlight the Harry's Here, She's Not visual of the upcoming grand event. It's a not too subtle whisper that if only Harry would unload the Bitch, he might be welcomed back.

Whether that hints at some other whispers Tominey got from the Palace is anyone's guess.

But, at a minimum, the column also confirms something else which is visually symbolised by Meghan not attending the coronation (please, spare us the bilge about the four year old's birthday party): the only way Harry gets back in is without Meghan.

Also interesting is Charles' attempts to de-Christianise this ceremony, giving in to the impulse to universality that, ironically, undermines the very source of his kingship, which is based in a particularity: the relationship of Sovereign to People, like the marriage service between two people, is meant to symbolise the relationship between Christ and His Church.

Islam, by the way, utterly rejects the "knowability" of God/Allah, which is precisely what Christ represents: the Word being made Flesh and walking amongst us.

Having prayers read in Westminster Abbey as the King is anointed with holy oil by the Archbishop of Canterbury is another sort of betrayal, if one cares about that.

Islam is succeeding because it isn't interested in "universality" except the kind where every human on earth worships Allah. Islam clings to its particularity and, thus, is now the fastest growing religion in Britain and much of the rest of the West.

People don't join a club for "universality": they join it specifically for particularity.

I don't point it out as a believing Christian, but as someone watching a historic unravelling, as Charles undermines, I'm sure with the best intentions, the very foundation of his position.

by Anonymousreply 515April 15, 2023 2:15 PM

^*Having prayers read in Westminster Abbey as the King is anointed with holy oil by the Archbishop of Canterbury by representatives of faiths that flatly reject the very concept of what Christ represents is tantamount to blasphemy.

is how that sentence should have read

by Anonymousreply 516April 15, 2023 2:18 PM

How big will Archie's birthday bash be? Will Auntie Tyler & Orca bring in a 200 singer Gospel choir. Will there be African dancer?. WillSnoop do a standup routine. Will Jay-Z & Bouncey do a duet? Will it break the internet? But best of all what will her crown look-like?

by Anonymousreply 517April 15, 2023 2:27 PM

I don't think there's any basis to think the Queen would have abdicated. She was the last of her generation and believed very deeply in the link between God and the monarch, as fanciful as it seems in 2023. More, it seems likely she was diagnosed with a terminal cancer at some point in the year before her death. She didn't even opt for a regency.

Charles said the same thing the day after her death: I am here until I die. On the flip side, Charles has said other things that didn't hold, like Princess Consort, so you never really know with him.

by Anonymousreply 518April 15, 2023 2:38 PM

R516 Always nice to hear from 1423 AD

by Anonymousreply 519April 15, 2023 2:42 PM

R516 is correct. About all of it, especially Islam.

by Anonymousreply 520April 16, 2023 12:21 AM

I should add that Charles' thinly veiled contempt for Parliament, in deciding to cut this or that MP to get the seating down, is also arrogant. The term "His Majesty's Government" is a courtesy, not a reality. The monarchy was reinstated by Parliament in 1689 after Cromwell, when William IV and Mary were brought in. The monarchy is Parliament's creature, not the other way round. When William IV was crowned, a gallery was built in the Abbey so that every signal member of Parliament could witness him signing the oath. Everyone knew the score that allowed the monarchy back in.

I once viewed Charles' disastrous choice of a wife as partly due to circumstances in which a somewhat desperate man of 32 under enormous pressure to marry a nice girl and breed was corralled by a by a very appealing and clever ingenue who realised very quickly how much star power she had, and used it to seduce the press and public to secure the job.

But watching him over the years, notably the Spider Memos to MPs in breach of his constitutional position years ago, for which he was lucky to escape accountability, and now watching him attempt to play to quite another gallery whilst displaying imperious arrogance to the gallery on whom the very structure of his position rests, I'm coming to the conclusion that Charles is an arrogant fool.

He has none of his mother's humility, or her understanding of the position of the monarchy vis-a-vis the Church and Parliament.

He's an idiot. Harry has gotten the worst of both his parent's personae: his mother's borderline fantasist and illiterate lability, and his father's petulant, thin-skinned arrogance.

The only thing that will stop the monarchy from disappearing after William, is Charles being raptured in a year or two, and the hugely popular, still youthful Waleses taking over.

by Anonymousreply 521April 16, 2023 1:41 PM


by Anonymousreply 522April 16, 2023 1:41 PM

^^*every single (not signal) member of Parliament

by Anonymousreply 523April 16, 2023 1:42 PM

R521 His Pa lived to 99yo, His mum 98. He will be Charles The Last in 2043.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 524April 16, 2023 5:38 PM

[quote] I should add that Charles' thinly veiled contempt for Parliament, in deciding to cut this or that MP to get the seating down, is also arrogant.

Charles’s decision to cut down the number of MPs (and members of the peerage) in attendance at the coronation in an attempt to allow a broader sample of British society into the event is simply a recognition that Britain is a different place than it was in 1953. Contrary to much belief, we are not an especially deferential society any more, and MPs in particular simply do not attract the same esteem as the generation led by Churchill and Attlee did.

By reducing the number of MPs and peers he has knocked around 1500 people off the guest list (including the spouses/partners). In any case, as a simple matter of Realpolitik, Charles has little to fear from excluding MPs. According to current polls (and the number of MPs who have declared their intent to stand down), it’s unlikely that more than half of them will remain in Westminster by the end of next year anyway. The reality is that Charles is likely to be in office far longer than any of them. The monarchy is by far the most stable, unchanging part of the constitution, and is there to counterbalance the constant churn of he elected house.

[quote] The term "His Majesty's Government" is a courtesy, not a reality. The monarchy was reinstated by Parliament in 1689 after Cromwell, when William IV and Mary were brought in.

Erm, you have overlooked a couple of monarchs there…

by Anonymousreply 525April 16, 2023 6:16 PM

The guest list was also wildly reduced, to the usual capacity of Westminster Abbey, about 2000, from the 8000 that got crammed in on bleachers in 1952.

by Anonymousreply 526April 16, 2023 7:06 PM

Pa's own family is different then it was in 1953 and we've seen how adroitly he's dealt with that. He's a hide bound old git. Only hope for the Windsors is his boozing takes him off early but he'll probably linger well into his dotage.

by Anonymousreply 527April 16, 2023 8:11 PM

I wouldn't count on that r524. His health isn't as good. I give him about 12 years at the absolute most.

by Anonymousreply 528April 16, 2023 10:52 PM

Oliver Cromwell dies in 1658.

His son Richard is ousted as Lord Protector in 1660, and the Stuart monarchy is restored as Charles II officially takes the throne. In british history, this is called the Restoration.

Charles II dies in 1685; his brother James II takes the throne.

James II is ousted in 1688 because he is revealed to be Catholic and because his second wife wife Mary of Modena gives birth to a Catholic male heir. James II's Protestant eldest daughter by his first wife, Mary, Princess of Orange, assumes the throne alongside her husband, Prince William of Orange, as Mary II and William III: this is referred to in British history as the Glorious Revolution.

by Anonymousreply 529April 16, 2023 11:00 PM

How Harry Is Already Spinning What This Time?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 530April 17, 2023 1:23 AM

If ya can't beat em join em.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 531April 17, 2023 5:05 AM

^ The best she's ever looked LOL

by Anonymousreply 532April 17, 2023 5:05 AM

Hear Hear!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 533April 17, 2023 1:54 PM

R525 The fact remains that it was Parliament that reinstituted the monarchy, not the monarchy that reinstituted itself. The monarchy serves at the pleasure of the elected representatives of the people, and the moment those polls reach 75% or so for abolishing the monarchy, it's gone.

The real "monarch" of this country is whoever is sitting in Downing Street. The entire farce of the monarch asking the leader of the new party in power, or reading the plans for "my government" at the opening of Parliament, the terms "HM's Prison" "HM's Government" "HMS" are all so much tinsel.

Yes, it's true the Abbey only seats 2,000. But speaking of more representatives of society: that is what those MPs bloody ARE.

It is precisely the MPs in the House who should be there for THAT reason.

Those are seats that should have been guaranteed and cut down the seats for his charity leaders and causes and Gulf State potentates and representatives of every religion on earth.

by Anonymousreply 534April 17, 2023 2:29 PM

And, R525, the Stuart Restoration took place in 1660, but it was with William and Mary that Parliament asserted that the monarchy would be a Protestant one. William and Mary were brought in from The Netherlands to retrieve England from the Catholicism of James II. The Stuart Restoration was over.

The arrival of William and Mary in 1650 set the new era of the relationship between Parliament and the monarchy. That's why that gallery was built to ensure that every single elected MP from the HOUSE (the House of COMMONS, not the House of LORDS) could be present. It was a message to the people and a message to the monarchy.

Every one of those MPs should be there, and is owed a place there far more than the local imams, chief rabbis, Buddhist monks, and whomever else.

As you can see, I feel quite strongly about this as an Englishman.

by Anonymousreply 535April 17, 2023 2:36 PM

Benjamin Ryan is one of the most tedious forces to emerge from the pandemic Twitterati. Now he won't go away. Total attention whore.

by Anonymousreply 536April 17, 2023 2:44 PM

R535 Unlike his Mum, Charlie has a knack for misreading the room.

by Anonymousreply 537April 17, 2023 3:37 PM

Well, r535, “reinstated”, was surely the wrong word to use about William and Mary’s seizure of the throne. It literally means “to restore/return to a former state”, which is far more applicable to the Restoration of Charles II than to the accession of William and Mary, which was much more of a (Glorious) Revolution.

Regarding the attendees next month, I admire your respect for democratic, but feel absolutely no scruple in saying that very few people are going to miss the presence of Matt Hancock, Jeremy Corbyn, Mhairi Balck, or Priti Patel in Westminster Abbey. And if it frees up space to invite religious leaders of all faiths, as well as humanists, atheists sportsmen, artists, charity leaders and military leaders, then I am all for it.

I’m a Scotsman, and feel very little concern for politicians who are past their sell-by date.

by Anonymousreply 538April 17, 2023 6:31 PM

Isn't anyone looking after Kate Middleton? She has lost a significant amount of weight. Doesn't look healthy

by Anonymousreply 539April 17, 2023 6:39 PM

[quote] The real "monarch" of this country is whoever is sitting in Downing Street.

This goes against every constitutional principle upon which the Uk constitution is based. The Prime Minister has immense power, but he is not a King. It is parliament which is sovereign. We have had Prime Ministers who seemed to believe that they were elected monarchs, but it never ends well.

The monarchy may be the weakest part of the Britain’s democracy, but the monarch’s right to decide on his/her own coronation is absolute. It is one of those few occasions where the Prime Minister may advise and warn, but may not instruct.

by Anonymousreply 540April 17, 2023 6:40 PM

Well put, R538.

by Anonymousreply 541April 17, 2023 6:41 PM

There is not formal UK "constitution" as Americans know it. Just a batch of codified "traditional" laws. Which explains why their judges still where those ridiculous powdered wigs. Apparently the only "constitutional rights" Brits have are the right to wear silly hats and dress in drag. Which they exercise to the full.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 542April 17, 2023 11:17 PM

Unlike his mum r537?? She was exactly the same.

by Anonymousreply 543April 18, 2023 3:22 AM

R540 That is why I put the word "monarch" in quotes .

Without Parliament's assent, William and Mary's "seizure" of the throne wouldn't have happened. It was a mutual agreement.

And it was also Parliament's will that the country be established as a Protestant entity, and to end the Catholicism that the Stuart Restoration carried on after QEI died without direct heirs.

R538 I know few want to see those on the list you mentioned (and for whom I share your contempt) in the seats.

But isn't that the point? Picking and choosing amongst which sectors of the electorate (those MPs WERE elected, remember) can share in witnessing the contract being enacted on 6 May between the monarch and the country belies the constant meme the monarchy puts out there: We are above politics because We represent everyone. We are the unifying arm of the ship of state.

Is not the MPs the real testament to British "diversity" - of opinion and values, not just skin colour ajnd surnames?

I view Charles' picking and choosing MPs to get the numbers down much as I view his stance that it's no big deal that the public know that he doesn't accept the deeply Christian basis of his kingship and the oath he is about to take, as appalling. Ditto his casual willingness to engage in a spot of blasphemy to prove his diversity creds. He's treating this event like a wedding party instead of the sacramental union it is supposed to be.

The Queen was the last of a breed who deeply believed what she said in 1953, that it was not about her, it was about the thing itself. Charles has none of mother's humility.

Charles only believes in his right to be King. That doesn't augur well for the monarchy, and whether that's a good thing or not can be saved for another thread.

by Anonymousreply 544April 18, 2023 9:50 PM

Listen, you, R544...you'll have to pry this golden orb and sceptre out of my cold, dead hands!

by Anonymousreply 545April 18, 2023 10:06 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!