Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Finally, the End of “Tár“

I want to say one last time: This movie is middlebrow crap.

In this turgid, conservative (politically, yes, but aesthetically, truly conservative) film, our main character, Lydia Tár, is a conductor, writes Jacob Rosenberg. Supposedly, she is a great one. The film takes us through her “cancellation.” There are other plot points, there are other moments. But this is what this film is about. It is a cancel culture movie focused on the abuser.

It is a film version of a finely-wrought Atlantic piece on cancel culture. In each, there are concrete successes—crisp sentences and scenes—but nothing is beautiful, and nothing is challenging. As Brody wrote: “‘Tár’ is a useful reminder of the connection between regressive ideas and regressive aesthetics.” What even is there to analyze here? The shots are languid. Professional lighting. Meaningless and composed frames of Cate Blanchett.

It is not an illuminating movie; it is just quiet. In its silences, the greatest minds of a generation have found much more interesting ways of viewing Tár than director Todd Field could ever imagine himself. What if the end was a dream? What if the hyper-focus on an abuser doesn’t elicit empathy (despite that being exactly what it seems to do)? What if one of the most condescending, ridiculous scenes I’ve ever seen in a film was, in fact, not a poorly written Gen-X jeremiad but something which offers Easter eggs to question art’s nature to reality itself?

The movie is awarded a knowingness it never earns. The film treats you like an idiot.

No scene has been more overlooked and overanalyzed in this way than when Tár teaches and rants at a student. In this scene—the centerpiece of the film—Tár battles against a “BIPOC” and “pangender” student who does not want to play the cancellable Bach.

But the student is not a human so much as something out of Bari Weiss’ collection of finger puppets. This scene has for some reason been treated as purposely stupid—a subtle play on the viewer’s expectations. But it isn’t. It’s just bad writing. It is the fantasia of someone frustrated by cancel culture.

Rosenberg delivers an insightful analysis of the film at the link.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23March 17, 2023 8:38 PM

The awards are over - time to deal with real life.

by Anonymousreply 1March 14, 2023 1:55 PM

Lil’ Miss Rosenberg has spoken! Get her! Guess it needed more buttplugs and hotdog dildos.

by Anonymousreply 2March 14, 2023 2:03 PM

[quote] In the end, what I wanted from Tár was to just say with its chest what it whispers. Show art is powerful. Do a single thing formally or in the script that shocks. Make us squirm not with this annoying logic about cancel culture, but terror: Make us fall in love with Tár’s art as we see the evil she does.

I read that whole essay. How annoying. He just whines throughout the whole thing, culminating in a personal attack on Zadie Smith, and then saying the above quote—that his problem with Tár is that the story is not the story he would have preferred it told. An entirely different story. It's like saying pianos are terrible instruments that should not exist because you were really hoping to have heard guitar music.

by Anonymousreply 3March 14, 2023 2:06 PM

as a professional classical musician, blachett's conducting chops are laughable at best

by Anonymousreply 4March 14, 2023 2:08 PM

This was my reading of the movie as well and I was perplexed at so many film critics creaming themselves over it.

by Anonymousreply 5March 14, 2023 2:13 PM

Tard, as in retarded

by Anonymousreply 6March 14, 2023 2:16 PM

R4 please expand, I find conducting as an art form so fascinating. What could Cate have done differently for more verisimilitude?

by Anonymousreply 7March 14, 2023 2:24 PM

[quote] What if one of the most condescending, ridiculous scenes I’ve ever seen in a film was, in fact, not a poorly written Gen-X jeremiad but something which offers Easter eggs to question art’s nature to reality itself?

Once I figured out what this sentence could possibly mean, I realised I didn’t know to which scene it was even referring.

by Anonymousreply 8March 14, 2023 2:25 PM

Tar is Mommy Dearest for pseudo-intellectuals and trust fund hipsters.

by Anonymousreply 9March 14, 2023 2:48 PM

Cate's conducting tutor:

“Cate can conduct now, if she wants,” Murray Beale told the Observer. “She is very musical, sings beautifully and now she has the tools to conduct. I suggested she learn the musical lines of the pieces by heart, rather than learning the score or copying another performance.”

“I’m delighted that colleagues say it is authentic,” said Murray Beale. “We went into great detail on the psychology of conducting. These abusive behaviours do still exist. There are not many places where a boss has such power. A conductor is a gatekeeper. I have witnessed anger in rehearsal and even a tussle between conductor and musician. It’s a highly competitive field.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10March 14, 2023 3:03 PM

This review is ao convoluted to the point of being illegible. He follows more or less the same route of Brody in The New Yorkers. The problem is Brody is profoundly dishonest: in his first paragraph he tell us the movie treats Lydia Tar as a victim and her accusers unhinged or hysterical, which is completely false.

Although we are not given much details about what happened with the student who died, we see her frantic reactions, deleting emails, invading her assistant’s computer, etc. Also, great part of the movie involves her predatory, manipulative behavior in respect of the new musician, she even defrauds the audition process. Her wrongdoing ise ident, only we don’t know the full extent of it, because this is not a movie about (or mainly about) cancel culture.

Like it or not it is an ambiguous, intriguing film which does not provide evident answers.

by Anonymousreply 11March 14, 2023 3:04 PM

Mother Jones has gone down the crapper like NPR.

by Anonymousreply 12March 14, 2023 4:50 PM

Who is this cuck?

by Anonymousreply 13March 14, 2023 4:52 PM



by Anonymousreply 14March 14, 2023 4:59 PM

[quote] as a professional classical musician, blachett's conducting chops are laughable at best

Oh, [italic]dear[/Italic]... that dangling modifying phrase!

Your grammatical skills are laughable at best.

by Anonymousreply 15March 14, 2023 5:02 PM

R14 if they want to go that route, opera itself is middlebrow. It was generally considered soapy entertainment for aspirants and nouveau-riche, though some Kings & Queens and nobles throughout time been known to enjoy it. Opera hasn't the cachet of classical.

by Anonymousreply 16March 14, 2023 5:03 PM

R9 It’s Mommie Dearest. Dumbass.

by Anonymousreply 17March 14, 2023 11:47 PM

But that scene with the student refusing to play Bach is something that I and many other teachers have seen in the classroom over the past few years. It was remarkable how real that was.

by Anonymousreply 18March 15, 2023 12:03 AM

[quote]Oh, dear... that dangling modifying phrase!

fuck off, cunt. your prose ain't strungk and white, either. eat shit and die

by Anonymousreply 19March 15, 2023 12:07 AM

R18 that was me at 16 vs my flute teacher. I hated Bach then, and while my hate has softened with time I still don't like him now. I find almost all of his work barring perhaps the Te Deum unlistenable and tedious. If I never hear the Airs from the Goldberg Variations again. And it's almost all fucking religious, too.

The reification of this dusty man is absolutely beyond me, and I don't think that automatically makes me a philistine or an idiot. He isn't the be-all end-all of classical.

by Anonymousreply 20March 15, 2023 12:11 AM

Todd Field as a director peaked with 'In The Bedroom', btw.

Nick Stahl & Marisa Tomei were one of the best surprising couples ever put onscreen.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21March 15, 2023 12:12 AM

This idiot is also the Associate Editor of Mother Jones.

by Anonymousreply 22March 15, 2023 12:18 AM

Are you a student at a top musical conservatory, r20? It should also be pointed out that the BIPOC pangender student didn't like any classical composers, not just Bach. He was only interested in one composer, a contemporary female Icelandic composer. It's weird for a conducting student to like only one composer.

R18, do you teach at a "top" (to the extent that Julliard is top) music school?

by Anonymousreply 23March 17, 2023 8:38 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!