Continuation of the fat liar draq queen Congressman.
Related thread below.
Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
Continuation of the fat liar draq queen Congressman.
Related thread below.
by Anonymous | reply 109 | March 25, 2023 7:30 AM |
People keep saying it was a traditional Democratic district to begin with are ignoring that the lines were redrawn before this election and it became more Republican. And it was not Republican gerrymandering. The Democrats in Albany gerrymandered all the districts so badly that a court stepped and redrew the lines. But even in the old district prior to the Democratic congressman before Santos it had been long represented by a very popular Republican Peter King who retired. But I don’t know what King’s district lines looked like. My guess is that it is. “Purple” district. If the GOP can induce King to return they might hold it.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | February 24, 2023 10:31 PM |
No, King was on the south shore. This district was represented by Steve Israel (D) and Tom Suozzi (D) since 2000 prior to being redrawn.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | February 25, 2023 12:24 AM |
Pete King was the rep for NY-03 until 2013, not 2000. It’s a swing district that has mostly voted Democratic in the past decade.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | February 25, 2023 12:32 AM |
King fucking sucked
by Anonymous | reply 4 | February 25, 2023 12:35 AM |
King was a decent old fashioned Republican and a union supporter.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | February 25, 2023 12:53 AM |
King was anti-gay and voted against us whenever he could. I called his office and wrote letters in the 90s when Long Beach was still part of -03. He wrote back a very cordial letter hoping I might overlook those issues and find areas where we agreed. But I still voted against him.
On non-gay issues he was a voice of reason in the Republican Party. He voted against the Clinton impeachment and for 9-11 survivors.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | February 25, 2023 10:07 AM |
What lie did he tell today?
by Anonymous | reply 7 | February 25, 2023 6:08 PM |
Perhaps not today, but back in 2017.
He was questioned by the Secret Service, so you know damn well he lied his fat ass off.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | February 25, 2023 8:37 PM |
R8 That sounds like the kind of scam our Georgie would be involved in.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | February 25, 2023 9:54 PM |
You'd be hard-pressed to find a scam that wouldn't sound like this douchebag would be involved in.
If it's a scam of any sort, he'd be involved.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | February 25, 2023 10:00 PM |
R8, the sleaze keeps piling up with this guy
by Anonymous | reply 12 | February 26, 2023 12:05 AM |
This guy isn't just some conniving part-time drag queen grifter. He's a serious felon.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | February 26, 2023 12:33 AM |
Does he have only one or two jackets?
by Anonymous | reply 14 | February 26, 2023 7:37 AM |
2 jackets and 1 pair of dumb-ass looking glasses.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | February 26, 2023 8:46 AM |
His Orlando roomie & crimin' bra Gustavo looks kind of hot in the security photo.
Old family friend for sure.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | February 26, 2023 8:49 AM |
He actually does look hot.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | February 26, 2023 1:41 PM |
FINALLY! Someone in the Democratic corner is starting think!
Help Georgie bring them ALL down
Billboards aren't enough though. Democrats have to come up with a fantastic ground operation.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | February 27, 2023 6:04 PM |
Good for them!
They absolutely should make him the face of that party everywhere.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | February 27, 2023 6:19 PM |
But he is not the face of the GOP. To do that R19 would be mere propaganda.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | February 27, 2023 7:31 PM |
Pointing out a liar, criminal, thief, and corrupt person whose crimes his own party actively ignores and by extension accepts is "mere propaganda"?
No. He should be held up as the paragon for repig values.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | February 27, 2023 7:39 PM |
Yes he's guilty but the Party is not.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | February 27, 2023 7:57 PM |
Wow, I thought he was a Na'vi.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | February 27, 2023 8:02 PM |
Right, R20/R22--because the GOP would NEVER make a blanket accusation against all Democrats by holding up one of their own as the face of its party.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | February 27, 2023 8:07 PM |
Just like the GOP WOULD NEVER be yelling and screaming every day that Democrats were doing nothing to remove said corrupt lying congressman from Congress if the shoe were on the other foot.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | February 27, 2023 8:11 PM |
The GOP IS collectively guilty of not removing him from Congress for everything he's done. They have the numbers to and they won't. Please don't waste your time pearl clutching that it's unfair to say Santos is not the face of a corrupt party, because he is and they are.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | February 27, 2023 8:16 PM |
[quote] that it's unfair to say Santos is the face of a corrupt party
Fixed.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | February 27, 2023 8:18 PM |
R26 is right. They could pressure him to resign but they're not doing that.
And there are Republicans like Elise Stefanik who endorsed him, too, and are still standing by him
by Anonymous | reply 28 | February 27, 2023 8:20 PM |
[quote]Yes he's guilty but the Party is not.
When his party admits as much and makes efforts to remove him from his ill-gotten seat, THEN I'll believe they're not guilty either. Until that time, however, they are just as complicit in this mess.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | February 27, 2023 8:54 PM |
The GOP is 100% complicit.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | February 27, 2023 9:11 PM |
R22, the GOP is 100% guilty. They knew about his lies when he was campaigning yet did nothing. Now everyone knows about his lies and corruption and the party is refusing to remove him from Congress. He really is the face of the party.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | February 27, 2023 9:20 PM |
McCarthy went in as the Speaker knowing this guy lied his ass off and totally misled the district's constituents, and McCarthy said and did nothing. And still does nothing. McCarthy is literally the face of the House GOP. One-hundred-percent complicit and corrupt.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | February 27, 2023 9:25 PM |
From the article at r18:
[quote]Santos has recently been telling people [bold]he is considering running for a second term,[/bold] according to multiple Republican sources, after previously signaling to Republicans he wouldn’t seek reelection.
There was no doubt in our collective minds here that he was lying when he acquiesced to the party by saying he wouldn't run again. He's so full of shit it's no surprise his eyes are brown.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | February 27, 2023 9:42 PM |
Once again Republicans show they'll do absolutely anything for power. Santos is a ghetto swindler, but he's right at home. He's just the crook to trust with the republican "agenda". If it wasn't so dangerous, it would be comical.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | February 28, 2023 4:21 AM |
He's talking about running for a second term so he can "legally" charge expenses to the campaign, which he's done already.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | February 28, 2023 4:50 AM |
Andy Ogles (the other one)
He'll get away with all of his mess too...
by Anonymous | reply 36 | February 28, 2023 10:30 AM |
Weird I was told I reached my monthly free article limit. But it's March 2. I have not been reading NY Magazine. ^
by Anonymous | reply 38 | March 2, 2023 10:16 PM |
Thanks, R39. I'm reading the article now. Clearly these are all people who hold no scruples, ethics, or morals. This is a group of people where only fame is the objective and it is obvious to me that they are all of the reality TV culture. From the article;
[quote]Sitting beside Santos, smirking, is his bald and bearded 31-year-old “director of operations.” His name is Vish Burra. He’s a former drug dealer from Staten Island who, while he worked for Steve Bannon, was the guy you went through if you wanted to check out the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop. He also did crisis comms for Matt Gaetz, and, along with Santos, was part of a mini-MAGA cabal that took over the New York Young Republican Club. The club is run by Burra and Santos’s buddy, Gavin Wax.
This is good...
[quote]When he isn’t in Washington working on Capitol Hill for Santos, Burra lives here at home with his parents, in Rosebank.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | March 2, 2023 11:22 PM |
Damn, what kind of a lowlife works for Matt Gaetz, Steve Bannon, AND George Santos?
by Anonymous | reply 41 | March 2, 2023 11:23 PM |
R41, someone who hates all human life.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | March 2, 2023 11:25 PM |
[quote]His name is Vish Burra. He’s a former drug dealer from Staten Island
His name is Vish Burra. He’s a drug dealer from Staten Island
Fixded!
by Anonymous | reply 43 | March 3, 2023 1:12 AM |
R41, the Republican Party is full of lowlifes.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | March 3, 2023 7:24 AM |
It's simply all about trying to get fame.
Tweeted by NY Republicans and then retweeted by Vish Burra
by Anonymous | reply 45 | March 3, 2023 11:10 AM |
Stolen lapdogs sold by Santos in a fake animal charity scam?
by Anonymous | reply 46 | March 3, 2023 11:38 AM |
Surely you've heard of that little tidbit, ElderLez r46.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | March 3, 2023 1:08 PM |
Yes, seems an odd choice of words in that tweet under the circumstances.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | March 3, 2023 1:12 PM |
Oh, OK, I gotcha, hun. I didn't think you hadn't heard about it, but wanted to be sure.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | March 3, 2023 1:13 PM |
Re: the NYMag article. Meh… I had high hopes for a challenging write-up but it’s just a Republican puff piece. The Burra guy seems like another Bannon, McInnes, etc.
They only seem to interview vapid, GOP insiders who praise Santos, “Oh he’s throwing it back in their face! He’s got plans!” (Heard it before! That’s what they all say) No actual specifics.
Plus they make that “party” at the beginning seem like some kind of glamorous banger, “Santos holds court…” LOL! But then you look at the photos and it looks like Sunday dinner at the local cafeteria with your grandparents.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | March 3, 2023 8:32 PM |
[quote]Re: the NYMag article. Meh… I had high hopes for a challenging write-up but it’s just a Republican puff piece. LOL! But then you look at the photos and it looks like Sunday dinner at the local cafeteria with your grandparents.
There's that idiom of "It's the squeaky wheel that gets the oil"
by Anonymous | reply 51 | March 4, 2023 10:28 AM |
Stop at 1:18 to get a good sense and overview of the audience...
by Anonymous | reply 52 | March 7, 2023 1:14 PM |
Ya see? This is why the rule of law is dead and these people will get away with this. God forbid if you're a person of color and is caught with a joint. Your life is ruined. Willingly lying to the court, to the Judge, and a catalyst for the overthrow of an election and government, simply gets you censured...
[quote]Michael Melito, an attorney for Ellis, told CNN in a statement, “My client remains a practicing attorney in good standing in the State of Colorado. In a very heated political climate, we have secured that correct outcome.”
What a joke!
by Anonymous | reply 53 | March 9, 2023 6:14 PM |
A censure is a very serious matter and can have an extremely deleterious effect on your life and career.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | March 9, 2023 6:17 PM |
Could you provide examples of lawyers who experience deleterious effects upon their lives after being censured? Or is your comment sarcasm?
[quote]Public or private censure is a reprimand by a body administering the ethics rules. Some refer to this as a “slap on the wrist,” but clients MIGHT BE INCLINED to find alternate representation if they know their attorney was censured.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | March 9, 2023 6:24 PM |
Um, r55, did you even bother to check the signature box?
by Anonymous | reply 56 | March 9, 2023 7:03 PM |
Wow, what cons hasn't this guy pulled?
by Anonymous | reply 58 | March 9, 2023 11:06 PM |
Apparently, his attorney in Brazil is a convicted murderer.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | March 9, 2023 11:16 PM |
He’s a winner! The most corrupt politician in American history. New York Number One!
by Anonymous | reply 60 | March 9, 2023 11:21 PM |
R60, he’s probably not even in the running for the most corrupt but he may be the politician who has committed the greatest variety of crimes, and in a short span of time, too.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | March 9, 2023 11:29 PM |
Jesus Christ! When will this cunt be indicted?
by Anonymous | reply 62 | March 10, 2023 12:12 AM |
His care for a fantom pet fish reveals his true animal-loving nature.
Luckily for George, he was never evicted from a Kushner owned property.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | March 10, 2023 9:21 AM |
Deadbeat tenant with a fake fish tank. LOL.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | March 10, 2023 4:35 PM |
[quote]His care for a fantom pet fish
Is that anything like a goldfish?
by Anonymous | reply 65 | March 10, 2023 6:42 PM |
I read the article in R57 last night, same day that it was published. I think Santos is finished as a public figure. The article has the ring of truth and there are secondary witnesses who can back it up. I think Santos will be out of Congress within a week, by next Friday, at the latest. Faced with that kind of criminality, even the Republikunts will have to drive him out toot sweet. He's in serious legal trouble.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | March 10, 2023 7:16 PM |
[quote]toot sweet.
Oh, dear!
by Anonymous | reply 67 | March 10, 2023 7:20 PM |
When the money leads to Russia, NO ONE in the media/ DOJ/FBI congress, any other normal person, I suppose, wants to follow it.
Mueller..... Mueller....Mueller?
by Anonymous | reply 68 | March 10, 2023 7:21 PM |
R67, it was a joke, dickbreath.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | March 10, 2023 7:49 PM |
Are you really using dickbreath as an insult?
On a gay board?
by Anonymous | reply 70 | March 10, 2023 7:56 PM |
Filed paperwork to allow him to raise money for reelection
Despite claiming he wouldn't run again
by Anonymous | reply 71 | March 14, 2023 6:21 PM |
[quote]I read the article in [R57] last night, same day that it was published. I think Santos is finished as a public figure. The article has the ring of truth and there are secondary witnesses who can back it up. I think Santos will be out of Congress within a week, by next Friday, at the latest. Faced with that kind of criminality, even the Republikunts will have to drive him out toot sweet. He's in serious legal trouble.
Dream on.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | March 14, 2023 6:38 PM |
When it comes to legal jeopardy, he is in trouble, R72. Would YOU like the FBI, Congress, the state of New York, and Brazil investigating your finances and criminal charges brought against you?
by Anonymous | reply 73 | March 14, 2023 6:54 PM |
r73 My point is that it's only a few days until your deadline ("next Friday at the latest"), and NOTHING is happening to get him removed from office by then.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | March 14, 2023 7:08 PM |
R74, I'm not the poster you were responding to.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | March 14, 2023 7:14 PM |
[quote]Filed paperwork to allow him to raise money for reelection Despite claiming he wouldn't run again
And this surprises who?
If one didn't know that the guy was lying when he said that he would never run again is only a reflection on you. This is why I feel that Santos will get away with this. Who cares about if he is running or not! Put the notice out that everyone is watching the money and who the donors are. Donors will donate at their own risk.
by Anonymous | reply 76 | March 14, 2023 7:51 PM |
[quote] This is why I feel that Santos will get away with this.
So, R76, you think the NY State Attorney General, the District Attorney for Nassau County, the Queens District Attorney, the Federal Election Commission, the Justice Department, the House Ethics Committee, and Brazil are all going to let him slide? I think not.
by Anonymous | reply 77 | March 14, 2023 7:57 PM |
^Until I see him taken away in handcuffs anything is possible
by Anonymous | reply 78 | March 14, 2023 8:00 PM |
No, not all that is, R78. People here seem to think federal and state criminal investigations (especially regarding things like campaign finance fraud) should be handled within a month.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | March 14, 2023 8:02 PM |
He's an illiterate asshole.
(Santos, not Musto.)
by Anonymous | reply 81 | March 14, 2023 8:25 PM |
R71, I'm not surprised he is trying to run again. Santos has learned from Trump and others that you can often run out the clock. It takes years for investigations to go anywhere and in the meantime these guys are able to get away with a lot of things.
by Anonymous | reply 82 | March 15, 2023 7:30 AM |
Good point R82. If indictments/ convictions don’t get him, the voters in New York will. This Queens’ days are numbered.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | March 15, 2023 7:51 AM |
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one of the reasons Trump 's in the running for POTUS again is precisely this? Both grifters want to use campaign funds to "legally" fund their defense and it's actually legal?
by Anonymous | reply 84 | March 15, 2023 8:06 AM |
Isn't Santos required by the FEC to have a campaign treasurer before he can raise any money?
Has he actually found someone who's willing to admit to taking the job?
by Anonymous | reply 85 | March 15, 2023 8:15 AM |
Trump is certainly counting on legions of outraged Deeplorables to shield and save him from the jaws of the law, which I hope grind him up into a greasy orange pulp before vomiting him all over the ground. Santos HAS NO supporters. How many votes does anyone believe the guy could reasonably count on in a future election? (The answer is close to ZERO).
by Anonymous | reply 86 | March 15, 2023 12:30 PM |
[quote]No, not all that is, [R78]. People here seem to think federal and state criminal investigations (especially regarding things like campaign finance fraud) should be handled within a month.
Look I get you and I tend to be more like you. I tend to believe that good will triumph over evil and that right will win against wrong, but... these Republicans and today's current political environment are testing my core and fundamental values and beliefs! It is not as if evil and criminals have not walked away unscathed in this country before. Just refer to the Civil War and all those who got away without any consequences. Or the so many laws that have been written and passed to get someone off and avoid consequences. On and on...
by Anonymous | reply 87 | March 15, 2023 2:52 PM |
State and federal investigations into Santos about his campaign finances are not controlled by Republicans and can't just be dismissed, R87. Not to mention in two years' time, he will be gone from office. He will never win a reelection bid. He is despised by both Reublicans and Democrats alike in his (mostly Democratic) district.
by Anonymous | reply 88 | March 15, 2023 3:53 PM |
[quote] Not to mention in two years' time, he will be gone from office. He will never win a reelection bid. He is despised by both Reublicans and Democrats alike in his (mostly Democratic) district.
I'm old enough to recall similar things being said about George Wallace...
by Anonymous | reply 90 | March 15, 2023 9:56 PM |
George Wallace had his fans. Santos doesn't.
by Anonymous | reply 91 | March 15, 2023 10:15 PM |
R89 Imbeciles with that much money deserve Santos.
by Anonymous | reply 92 | March 15, 2023 10:24 PM |
[quote]I'm old enough to recall similar things being said about George Wallace...
What'd I do??
by Anonymous | reply 93 | March 15, 2023 10:34 PM |
R91 yes, George Wallace had more than fans, he had a base, white Southerners and white racist working class everywhere. So, he spoke for others, as reprehensible as that was. Santos is entirely a self serving grifter.
by Anonymous | reply 94 | March 16, 2023 9:17 AM |
David Pakman discusses the NYT story on Santos brokering a yacht deal:
by Anonymous | reply 95 | March 17, 2023 7:45 AM |
David Pakman discusses George Santos's credit card skimming operation:
by Anonymous | reply 96 | March 17, 2023 7:58 AM |
[quote]I read the article in [R57] last night, same day that it was published. I think Santos is finished as a public figure. The article has the ring of truth and there are secondary witnesses who can back it up. I think Santos will be out of Congress within a week, by next Friday, at the latest. Faced with that kind of criminality, even the Republikunts will have to drive him out toot sweet. He's in serious legal trouble.
Would you like to re-think that prediction?
by Anonymous | reply 97 | March 17, 2023 1:23 PM |
A house could fall on him. He's going to last at least through 2023
by Anonymous | reply 98 | March 17, 2023 7:26 PM |
OK,OK!! Killing myself NOW!! -R66
by Anonymous | reply 99 | March 17, 2023 9:00 PM |
Don't do that, r99. You'll miss the show.
Even Nostradamus missed some.
by Anonymous | reply 100 | March 17, 2023 10:39 PM |
Here he reviews the new Space Force suit! Looks like he finally got a new sports jacket and too tight pants.
by Anonymous | reply 101 | March 24, 2023 2:28 PM |
He must be loving all the current media distractions!
by Anonymous | reply 102 | March 24, 2023 2:34 PM |
Those pants at r100 look cheap af.
by Anonymous | reply 103 | March 24, 2023 2:50 PM |
Brazilian prosecutors agree to plea deal in bad-check case
by Anonymous | reply 104 | March 24, 2023 7:08 PM |
[quote]"I am not a criminal here -- not here or in Brazil or any jurisdiction in the world. Absolutely not. That didn't happen," he said at the time.
This guy is a scumbag.
by Anonymous | reply 105 | March 24, 2023 7:37 PM |
^ So now that he cut a deal where he admitted to stealing....can we throw him out?
by Anonymous | reply 106 | March 24, 2023 7:39 PM |
McCarthy will come up with a different excuse. Remember, he said "he hasn't been convicted of anything, right?" when asked if they'd expel him.
Now he'll say some bullshit like, "he hasn't been convicted of anything in the United States, right?" They have no shame.
by Anonymous | reply 107 | March 24, 2023 7:48 PM |
And another Friday goes by, R57 ....
by Anonymous | reply 108 | March 24, 2023 11:36 PM |
[quote] Santos is now gainfully employed and "re-socialized."
Re-socialized as a lying sack of shit. Congress is increasingly a fucking clown show.
He should have been on MTG's field trip to the D.C. jail, but probably would have been too much of a distraction.
by Anonymous | reply 109 | March 25, 2023 7:30 AM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!