This has got to be Matt Walsh

Wait. Matt Walsh is actually a horrible human and not the wonderful man we all think he is?

I. Am. Shocked.

Matt Walsh's face and vibe has always been full of dark secrets and transgressions to me. One look tells me he's capable of anything. I assumed something like this had already been out there.

Maybe I'm mistaken but my understanding that this guy's back story is contradicting the persona he's putting forward as a "good white guy" whereas Matt Walsh is openly bigoted.

[quote]Maybe I'm mistaken but my understanding that this guy's back story is contradicting the persona he's putting forward as a "good white guy" whereas Matt Walsh is openly bigoted.

Could be. I took it as a slap at Walsh's self-professed Normal Family Man persona. He's openly contemptuous of not only gays but the childfree. As for "white," in recent days he's been reposting a school bus fight with some black kids and showing great restraint by not busting out the n-word.

Greenwald is such a stunt queen. If he knows the details, even knowing that other publications have been offered the story but won’t touch it, then why won’t it he publish such an important and ironclad story?

He’s such a filthy little trick.

Is Glenn still fucking the street urchin?

If Glenn is salivating over it, it’s someone on the Left.

I can't respect someone who teases like this and doesn't deliver, despite claiming to be morally outraged and claiming to have damning evidence.

It's whatever his Russian overlords told him to insinuate.

The implication seems to be that this is a "good white guy" on the left. First of all, only men on the left feel compelled to explain that they're one of the (presumably few) GOOD white guys. Secondly, he says that the "left liberal media" knows all about this guy but won't report on him. Why would they restrain themselves if the man in question is on the right?

[quote]I understand several in left-liberal media were given it on a platter - including feminist sites - and they refused to publish it despite court proof of stalking of women, homophobic rage, and begging to turn police snitch

So wait, why won't they publish it? Especially if it's public record. They love to publish about Matt Schlapp and others. Something doesn't add up here.

It all adds up to not being Walsh.

Walsh is a scumbag in its truest form.

Even Brenda and Brandon refuse to have anything to do with him!

He seems like a deeply depressive person. You can see it on his face. If one of his 28 ,000 kids turns out gay it'll be interesting for him.

Turn police snitch? Wtf? Is it 1950?

I hate cancellation because some of the claims are so specious.

Wikipedia begins their bio of Matt Walsh as being RIGHT WING. Why is his name even being invoked ?

His wife has had SEVEN miscarriages!

Why does her body keep murdering those precious babies?

Greenwald has pretty much confirmed it's a woke person so that makes a lot more sense now. OP talking about the alt-right threw me.

Yes. Red herring. NEXT!

It's probably not someone very well-known too because I think they still would report a story if he was very famous. There may not be a lot of public interest in publishing stuff about some random journalist or twitter user whom most people haven't heard of.

Stop playing games OP! We are onto you now!!

Glenn is such trash. This is the company he chooses to associate with and he did it to himself.

This is very obviously meant to be about a progressive. "Good white man" does not describe anyone alt-right, even with the scare quotes.

OP, you seem a bit confused at best.

So, almost 2 months and no follow up?

Glenn works in mysterious ways.

That's not Matt Walsh. Firstly, if it were about Matt, Glenn wouldn't type that post -- Glenn's media strategy these days is not getting on the bad side of the right for as long as he can. Secondly, would anyone be surprised if it turned out Matt has a police report for being homophobic? It's someone else, and I know who that is, but I won't say the name. It's not interesting enough to inform you all. I will only say it's a small left-wing journalist from Brooklyn with a Celtic name. But he's disappointingly small and I doubt 90% of Datalounge would have heard of him.

R25 Why not say it? Eoin Higgins.

Interesting.

r26 Because I didn't want to help Glenn in his vendetta. Eoin is correct about the things he says about GG.

I believe gay men should have the right to adopt.

But I don't think ugly gay men should be able to adopt at all.

Favela molester says what?

I just watched a Matt Walsh video.

He’ll turn into Jordan Peterson soon.

His idea on gender ideology obviously makes sense. It makes sense to the average person whether they’re left or right.

But he’s just a religious nut with his own ideologies that aren’t based in fact or logic or science either.

That makes sense. Here's a pretty thorough breakdown of how Glenn's position on trans has completely changed in the last couple of years (bonus: absolutely hideous unfiltered photo of Glenn's fat face and tragic skin).

I saw a few clips where he spoke in New Mexico a few weeks back and he went back and forth with 2 trans women. Both intelligent and educated but Walsh demolished both of them and it was kind of sad seeing them getting flustered and their ideology fall apart. One was an EMT and Walsh asked what he would do if a man called with a medical emergency and told him he was having a miscarriage. The other one said she was a woman because she listened to a podcast by a trans woman 2 years ago and that his friends all say he’s a woman.

[quote] Matt Walsh's face and vibe has always been full of dark secrets and transgressions to me.

He has a beard therefore he must be either Russian and or evil.

R33 I’m watching those videos right now and both of them were idiots. The EMT isn’t even defining transgender by transgender logic. They were saying trans women could be biological females. I don’t even think most trans people agree with that. The other one simply thought others validating them defines their gender. Both really weak.

If you watch Joe Rogan and Matt Walsh’s debate on gay marriage, Joe completely backs Matt into a corner.

He’s like Ben Shapiro. He can own college kids and public debates but when they go up against others who are on similar platforms, they buckle.

[...]

[quote] If Glenn is salivating over it, it’s someone on the Left.

Ah ha ha ha ha ha!

I know, right Vlad? All the best people think that’s funny.

Matt Walsh describes himself on Twitter as

[quote]Theocratic fascist, bestselling children’s author

Tells me all I need to know, even if this isnt who Glenn Greenwald is talking about he still isnt someone I have any time for

[quote] Matt Walsh

He posted this interesting child-lover.

Something MUST be done!!

I had no idea that Matt Walsh was an actual children's author. That's messed up.

[quote]His idea on gender ideology obviously makes sense. It makes sense to the average person whether they’re left or right.

Walsh understands the reality of biological difference between males and females in the same way feminists do.

[quote]But he’s just a religious nut with his own ideologies that aren’t based in fact or logic or science either.

And where he differs with feminists is that he sees biological reality as a way to subjugate women, where was feminists know that reproductive health care, abortion rights, menopause protection etc liberates women.

Yeah and like I said, his intellectualism falls apart whenever he mentions his ideology.

And I’ve said this before but the truth is people like him breed radical left wing nuts as much as they breed radical right wing nuts.

All of the people he attacks generally weren’t raised in open minded free thinking households, they had parents like him. You can watch “What Is A Woman” and all the kooky people he interviews all probably had backgrounds of being raised in strict conservative families.

Religion typically breeds lunacy, not open minds. That’s why radical trans groups as are crazy as these religious Christians because that’s how they were taught to express themselves.