Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Teacher shot by 6-year-old texted a dire warning to a loved one before she was wounded

The Virginia teacher who was shot by her 6-year-old student texted a loved one before she was wounded that the boy was armed and that school officials were failing to act, according to a source close to the situation.

The source on Tuesday said Abigail Zwerner sent the text about an hour before she was shot on Jan. 6, saying that the student said he had a gun in his backpack and administrators at Richneck Elementary School in Newport News weren’t helping.

The text “showed her frustration,” said the source, who only disclosed details of the single text message to NBC News and not the messages that came before or after it. “She was frustrated because she was trying to get help with this child, for this child, and then when she needed help, no one was coming.”

When asked about Zwerner’s text message and previous safety concerns from teachers and staff, Newport News Public Schools spokesperson Michelle Price said, “Anything that has been reported to our school leadership team in regards to concerns at Richneck from teachers and staff members is part of the investigation. It’s being thoroughly investigated.”

On Wednesday morning, Zwerner’s attorney Diane Toscano held a news conference and said three teachers went to the school administration about the boy’s behavior on Jan. 6 and that he was believed to have had a gun on campus.

Zwerner first went to a school administrator between 11:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. and said the student threatened to beat up a classmate, Toscano said. A second teacher went to a school administrator at 12:30 p.m. and told the administrator the teacher took it upon herself to search the 6-year-old boy’s backpack.

“The administrator downplayed the report from the teacher and the possibility of a gun,” Toscano said.

A third teacher told an administrator shortly before 1 p.m., the boy showed a student the gun at recess and “threatened to shoot him if he told anybody,” Toscano said.

A fourth employee asked an administrator for permission to search the boy and was denied, Toscano said.

The administrator told the employee, to “wait the situation out because the school day was almost over,” Toscano said.

Toscano said the “administration could not be bothered” and the tragedy was “entirely preventable” if the administration “had taken action when they had knowledge of imminent danger. But instead, they failed to act and Abby was shot.”

Toscano said she plans to bring forth a lawsuit on Zwerner’s behalf.

Prior to the news conference, the law firm representing the Zwerner family said it could not confirm the text and did not respond to requests for comment from the family.

The news of the direct warning from Zwerner comes after the school system’s superintendent, George Parker III, said at a virtual town hall this month that the boy had come to school late and that his book bag was inspected upon his arrival at the office to sign in, according to parents who watched the meeting.

“At least one administrator was notified of a possible weapon,” Parker said in a video reviewed by NBC News.

A Newport News police spokeswoman said authorities also determined through their investigation that “a school employee was notified of a possible firearm at Richneck Elementary before the shooting occurred,” adding, “The Newport News Police Department was not notified of this information prior to the incident.”

Further details weren’t made available about who conducted the search, why the gun wasn’t found and whether the child’s clothing was physically examined.

Zwerner, 25, was hailed as a hero by police who said after she was intentionally shot and seriously wounded in her hand and chest, she still managed to safely escort about 20 students out of her first-grade class at Richneck. She was released from the hospital last week.

“I believe she did save lives, because I don’t know what else might have happened if those kids would have stayed in that room,” Newport News Police Chief Steve Drew said during a news conference earlier this month.

No charges connected to the case have been publicly announced.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13January 27, 2023 4:30 PM

Last week, The Washington Post reported that administrators at the school had downplayed earlier warnings about the student despite repeated requests for help. School employees told Parker that Zwerner had asked for help with the student “several times” throughout the school year, according to messages obtained by the Post and not independently verified by NBC News. The messages do not indicate who Zwerner sought help from.

Another message from a teacher obtained by the Post details disturbing behavior from the student that preceded the shooting, though the dates of the alleged behavior are unclear.

The principal and vice principal of Richneck did not respond to requests for comment from the Post on the teacher’s account. School district spokeswoman Michelle Price told the Post that she could not “share any information in a child’s educational record” and also cited the ongoing police investigation and internal inquiry by the school.

Drew has said that the child’s mother legally bought the 9 mm Taurus firearm used in the shooting and that the boy took the gun from his home. Whether it was properly secured is a key element in the investigation, he has said.

The family of the boy who shot Zwerner said in a statement last week that the gun was “secured” when the child took it from their home but didn’t go into further detail.

“Our family has always been committed to responsible gun ownership and keeping firearms out of the reach of children. The firearm our son accessed was secured,” said the statement, released by the family’s attorney James Ellenson.

The statement also said the boy “suffers from an acute disability and was under a care plan at the school that included his mother or father attending school with him and accompanying him to class every day. Additionally, our son has benefitted from an extensive community of care that also includes his grandparents working alongside us and other caregivers to ensure his needs and accommodations are met. The week of the shooting was the first week when we were not in class with him. We will regret our absence on this day for the rest of our lives.”

Since the shooting, the statement added, the boy has been in a hospital receiving the “treatment he needs.”

Ellenson did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening about Zwerner’s text message before the shooting.

Richneck has been closed since the shooting. It is set to reopen on Monday and will be outfitted with a metal detector, school officials have said.

The district has secured funding for 90 state-of-the-art metal detectors that will be placed at all district schools, officials said.

The school district has had three instances of gun violence in 17 months.

by Anonymousreply 1January 27, 2023 1:47 PM

I think the child should spend the rest of his life in an institution—this will not go away in time. It might be kinder to put him down.

by Anonymousreply 2January 27, 2023 2:07 PM

The more details that come out about this story, the more I think this woman should be awarded in a lawsuit.

What happened to her, never should have happened.

Period.

by Anonymousreply 3January 27, 2023 2:08 PM

Why didn't she call the cops first? I hope she sues the hell out of that School district. It must be scary to be a teacher or a student nowadays.

by Anonymousreply 4January 27, 2023 2:09 PM

I was watching a news segment about this and something interesting I heard was how the boy was labeled with an "acute disability". Unfortunately I don't think a lot of people are questioning it -- we used "acute" in a medical setting to mean short term, despite severity. Like the difference between say, acute kidney disease vs chronic, was that short term vs long term. It seemed very strange to have a learning disability labeled that way.

It came across as a way to force this troubled kid into a normal school setting under the guise of "disabled", instead of acknowledging it as severe behavioral issues. It's difficult for a school to get a student out if they're disabled due to discrimination laws. Acute is also a nice way for parents to skip obligations to show up daily (well he's having a "good day" today.).

This kid needs serious therapy. I've never heard of one that young writing descriptive death threats like that -- wanting to see her burn alive in a fire. This wasn't a bad day at all, it was typical. I really hope the state does their job and puts this kid into an appropriate setting.

by Anonymousreply 5January 27, 2023 2:23 PM

Let’s see how long this thread lasts. The other one about this thug was deleted.

by Anonymousreply 6January 27, 2023 2:31 PM

[quote] Let’s see how long this thread lasts. The other one about this thug was deleted.

People can try to shut down discussion of this case, as much as they want.

But this teacher will get the last laugh, along with millions of dollars.

You can't suppress the truth, no matter how much "some people" want the story to go away.

by Anonymousreply 7January 27, 2023 2:38 PM

Blah, blah, blah, TL;DR, r5

[Quote] It might be kinder to put him down.

Finally, some common sense. Happy to assist if needed.

by Anonymousreply 8January 27, 2023 2:55 PM

I'm not the least bit surprised about the indifference of the school administration, but I wonder where the teacher's union was in all of this? It sounds as if this kid was well known & making specific threats. Not to say it's their fault, but why didn't they intervene *before* someone got hurt?

by Anonymousreply 9January 27, 2023 2:59 PM

[quote]I hope she sues the hell out of that School district.

She is. Didn’t you read “her attorney…”?

by Anonymousreply 10January 27, 2023 3:23 PM

I hope she cleans out the district and never had to teach again.

by Anonymousreply 11January 27, 2023 3:28 PM

I hope this woman gets a big payday too, but not unlike lawsuits against the police force, who ultimately pays for all this? The public.

Many, many moons ago I was a public school teacher and while I can appreciate the need to "mainstream" kids, rights of parents - all that - it shouldn't be at the expense of the teachers & the other kids who have to deal with this shit. Never mind the violence angle (bad enough), but you know that kid was a ticking time bomb that worried all the kids & the teachers. Their rights should not be subjugated at the expense of keeping kids like this is standard public school classrooms.

by Anonymousreply 12January 27, 2023 4:06 PM

[quote]I hope she cleans out the district and never had to teach again.

She’ll be branded a racist, since the incompetent leadership of this district is all black.

by Anonymousreply 13January 27, 2023 4:30 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!