Lawyers of DL: Is there really no possible legal recourse against Chaya Raichik a.k.a. Libs of TikTok?

For fuck's sakes America - do something about these domestic terrorists!!

She can be gone after the same way Alex Jones was.

Even a complete fucking psycho like Lauren Boebert knows to distance herself from an actual act of terrorism. Hell, even Tucker Carlson knows to keep his mouth shut when it becomes inconvenient. This fucking cunt is openly gloating about inciting terrorism, on the day the terrorism took place, and there's nothing we can do about her?

She's posting things that other people have actually said and done, so what would she be charged with, and would the people who she is reposting be held responsible too?

[quote]She can be gone after the same way Alex Jones was.

Jones said something that wasn't true. That's the difference.

Why hasn't Taylor Lorenz done any followup reporting? She's doing a public disservice by keeping this cunt's personal details concealed.

It would be antisemitic to go after her. If she were Muslim, then it's open season.

BUMP

I know her ilk and where she's from. She's one of these psycho, JDL- Kahane-type cunts. They are the absolute worst people. Virulently racist, hateful, violent filth. They're the assholes who go to Israel to be psycho settlers.

Of course, you'll never hear this cunt talk about medicaid/medicare/section 8 fraud, being such a "patriotic American."

Somebody needs to shank that bitch.

[quote] They're the assholes who go to Israel to be psycho settlers.

R8 Rather than remaining in America to be psycho Jew hating turds on an anonymous forum.

[quote][R8] Rather than remaining in America to be psycho Jew hating turds on an anonymous forum.

I couldn't give less of a fuck what you think. Anyone who lives in Brooklyn knows her type, you fucking asshole.They bilk US taxpayers and then go steal land in a country where they weren't born and they show up on day one being scum. What a wonderful thing for you to defend.

Of course, you'll defend a terrorist like her solely because she's Jewish and just ignoring what kind of asshole she is -- because you're like her, obviously.

R10, you seem very confused. Their alternative is not the one you mentioned.

So now that her name, voice, location and occupation have been outed.. how do we have NO pictures of this cunt or links to her socials etc.? Her identity was revealed since early this year, im a little surprised that we seemingly still know so little.

DL sleuths, how do we get this actual doxxing started?

^ meant obviously personal socials*

Lol. The psycho left once again trying to change the definition of a word. They, and their leaders of the CCP, are terrorists themselves.

Apparently this is her according to some article I read. I'll link in another post.

Here's the article. It's bad just FYI

And of course the thread has been taken over by the CCP paid terrorists. How much was is it again, 50 yuan per post?

R4 thinks all gays are groomers, since he thinks everything LOTT says is true. Why is he on a gay board?

[quote] I couldn't give less of a fuck what you think.

R11 Of course you don't. You're a psycho Jew hating turd. Who bash people llike Raichik solely because they're Jews. But that's psycho America/DL, innit. See psycho R12 for further examples.

R16, that actually is NOT her. A few articles have already pointed out that is someone else with the same name. Even the author (Taylor Lorenz) of the original Post article that outed Raichik’s identity had to implore people on IG to stop messaging the other (incorrectly identified) Chaya. Yikes.

^ and to follow up on this: something, just something, tells me the real Chaya Raichik beyond the Libs of TikTok account, is probably very unappealing physically speaking (and probably a ginormous loser with no friends IRL - hence why seemingly no online social media presence or testimonials from others to-date..)

Psycho femcel cunt bitch.

[quote][R4] thinks all gays are groomers, since he thinks everything LOTT says is true.

I mean...she literally reposts content that these people say and do themselves. Granted she's bringing it to the attention of an audience who will obviously have strong reservations about what is happening, but she is not lying. Her page blew up primarily from retweets of other people's content.

I will say that she helps to make it worse with her commentary. Honestly, none of the reposts needed her opinions or captions as they speak volumes for themselves. It also comes off as sensationalist and purposely trying to mold the opinion of the viewer before they have a chance to judge the content for themselves. I disagree with her doing that and believe she should've left well enough alone in that regard. However, even without a caption, there's no excusing this:

(note that the DC did the same thing with the sensationalism in the titles. It's not needed. Just the content itself is sufficient)

What a horrible, pathetic excuse for a human being. She’s vile and disgusting. You mock the murder of innocent people who you had a hand in slaughtering? What a depraved mind. I’m sure that she keeps her identity well hidden because if were to be revealed she would face immediate death threats from people around the world.

That said, it is extremely difficult to hide forever. I imagine that someone eventually will find her.

R21 Shit, thanks for correcting me. Apologies everyone for not doing a more thorough deep-dive.

There are a lot of similar accounts and they are just reposting what others have thought fit to post. I am not sure if reposting a public post is illegal anywhere, especially if making the original poster anonymous. Is Libs of TikTok a shit-stirrer? Yes, but the shit is not her shit; she is just stirring it. If any of the content offends you, you should probably get in touch with the people who originally posted it.

R28 yeah, I agree. I can't really see any real incitation to violence simply by sharing the post with a comment of disgust. It is shit-stirring, but that's not illegal as far as I'm aware.

Any pics of this femcel Chaya?

[quote]I can't really see any real incitation to violence simply by sharing the post with a comment of disgust. It is shit-stirring, but that's not illegal as far as I'm aware.

It's kind of hilarious that people are saying that the stuff she reposts is terrible, since that's her point, to bring attention to the fact that there is terrible stuff out there. She agrees with her detractors that it's terrible, but she's only spotlighting what other people have done. She's a whistleblower.

Was she not the one who made the phone call to the Boston children’s hospital about transgender surgery and posted it without any context etc? This stupid cunt spoke to some low-level nurse who obviously didn’t know what she was talking abt, then posted it on Twitter as if it was an actually an official pronouncement on the issue. She’s a vile bitch who is doing way more than just “reposting”.

To the trolls claiming Chaya Raichik is merely a re-poster:

[italic]Libs of TikTok promotes conservatism and anti-LGBT rhetoric. It has referred to schools as "government run indoctrination camps" for the LGBT community. It has encouraged followers to contact schools that allowed transgender students to use bathrooms corresponding to their gender identity. Libs of TikTok also aims to "spread the horrors of what doctors are doing to young, confused individuals".

Libs of TikTok has also said that adults teaching children about LGBT identities is abusive and constitutes child grooming. In since-deleted tweets, the account specifically accused Chasten Buttigieg and The Trevor Project organization of grooming. The account argued in another since-deleted tweet that any teacher who comes out as gay to their students should be fired. The account has claimed that being gender non-conforming or being an ally of the LGBT community is a "mental illness", and deliberately misgendered transgender people. In a since-deleted tweet, Libs of TikTok stated, "Men should not wear dresses. You can’t change my mind."

Libs of TikTok opposes gender-affirming care, arguing that it is mass scale child abuse and that "Any doctor performing [gender-affirming] surgeries [on children] should have their license revoked. They belong in prison".

The account has been criticized for spreading hoaxes, including the litter boxes in schools hoax about bathrooms accommodations for students that identified as cats, and a false claim that students in a second-grade class in Austin, Texas were being taught about furries.

Libs of TikTok has denied the existence of systemic racism, but argued that racism against white people was "flourishing" in the United States. Reporting by Slate stated that "Raichik's feed is colored by an intense hostility to liberals generally, but she holds an especially pronounced animosity toward LGBTQ people, city dwellers, and Black people who have been killed at the hands of police", noting that the account has defended and endorsed incidents of police brutality, including the murder of George Floyd and the killing of Ma'Khia Bryant.

In addition, she has also posted address, phone number, and employment information of the people she targets so they get harassed:

By the way, the Chaya Raichik photos that are credited to Instagram are of someone else. There are few pictures of "our" Chaya online. Below is one of them. I've heard she was married to a gay man, too.

[quote] In most countries she'd have been thrown in jail by now.

Lol.

When it comes to being a hysterical frau, you're certainly her mirror image.

R34, that is really messed up. I hope she faces a similar fate as Alex Jones.

Bring...her...down!

R35 That's not her. That's Taylor Lorenz.

R36 Go eat her pussy jello you sentient enema.

It is false (and rather generous) to portray her as someone who only shares ridiculous social media screenshots. She has also engaged in dangerous Project Veritas-style bullshit to promote harassment of doctors and hospitals.

I'm sure someone will immediately rush to her defense and regurgitate her talking points, and then give themselves a bunch of meaningless upvotes, but she's a nutjob who is happy to risk other people's lives in pursuit of viral fame and crowdfunding opportunities. She's the most vile kind of grifter.

[quote] It's kind of hilarious that people are saying that the stuff she reposts is terrible, since that's her point, to bring attention to the fact that there is terrible stuff out there. She agrees with her detractors that it's terrible, but she's only spotlighting what other people have done. She's a whistleblower.

Now, let's translate this into non-troll: It's kind of hilarious that people are saying that the stuff she and I repost are terrible, since that's her and my point, to bring attention to the fact that there is terrible stuff out there (primarily us, right-wing trolls.) She agrees with her detractors that it's terrible and she and I still keep trolling, but we are only spotlighting what other people have done and how we are twisting it. She's a whistleblower, in the sense that she gives a clear insight into who or what is behind our "ironic" hate speech.

R41 she's a nut but doctors who do double mastectomies on 15-year old's should be in prison.

I do hope at some point someone sues her into submission a la Alex Jones

she has already defamed people and perpetuated obvious hoaxes. If she keeps going at this rate someone is bound to file a case

she's absolutely vile. She clearly knows what she's doing is wrong and that is why she has no photos of herself online. The only ones falsely attributed to her are another woman who just happens to have the same name as her and also for some reason the woman who wrote the first article about her is now mistaken for Raichik herself

Whatever, r40 - have fun flicking your dried up bean to laughable fantasies of sending people to prison for being obnoxious, Karen.

r45 I'm sure they're the same people who protested rap music and demanded rappers be thrown in jail for inciting gang violence with their lyrics.

I mean...sure, turn on some C-Murder and you may get the urge to bust a cap in someone's ass, but that's not the point.

BTW C-Murder is, in fact, incarcerated. But for a completely unrelated matter. :-|

^ Actually, I take that back. People actually have been killed off of this song after fights broke out in clubs and parties. So, there is something to be said about "incitement."

This song was banned at our school dances. Even the radio edit.

[quote]In most countries she'd have been thrown in jail by now.

Where, OP. North Korea? Where else is free speech not permitted. She didn't "incite terrorism" by denouncing ridiculous drag shows aimed at children, nitwit. JFC, get a grip.

BTW--most people agree with her.

I love the maniac self-upvoting of all Republican trolls like r48. Makes one wonder if they aren't all the same person.

LOL, hate to break it to you, R49, I didn't even WW my post even once. Average, normal people agree with me. You have no argument. Your logic is impaired.

R50 Yes, you did. I can see it. You didn't know?

r51 No. They didn't. I'm one of those WWs on their posts and I don't care who knows.

No, you can't, R51. Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself.

R50/r52 = Same IP.

That sounds exhausting. Maybe try something healthier. What happened with hoarding cats for lonely shut-ins?

Nope again, R54.

Is there any possible recourse against the doctors who chop off girls' tits?

^Now THAT'S who should be in jail.

[quote][R50]/[R52] = Same IP.

There is no need to lie about this. Not only do you not have the tools to find this out (nor even know how to do so), but this right here proves that you are making pathetic attempts to intimidate people on here with whom you disagree. We're two different people whether you like it or not.

R10 = Matt

R20 = also Matt

R58 That sure got your tongue loose, eh

So "Libs of TikTok" reposting TikTok posts.

That's what social media is about.

^is reposting

R62 please point me where the TikTok is here?

r64 Pause.

So, you're more bothered that she's not staying true to her moniker than the actual situation she's tweeting about? Serious question.

You can tell from the ass shape of tge person at r25 that it's a woman, not a drag queen. Republicans have been doing this a lot these last few months: they take pictures of kids taken to trashy venues by their rihmght-wing parents, and blame it on LGBT people.

r66 You're...you're trolling right?

R65 Are you actually more upset about the fact that drags still live and breath than the fact that Chaya Raichik was back at inciting against Colorado queens just hours after a massacre in the same state? Serious question.

R64 Please tell us where what she wrote in that post is untrue:

"This organization in Colorado teaches kids how to become drag queens and helps kids "safely experience the art of drag on stage." Colorado state reps @leslieherod and @BriannaForCO promoted and encouraged this child drag organization and performance."

[quote][R65] Are you actually more upset about the fact that drags still live and breath

r68 No. I'm against the involvement of children in this very adult activity, as are most normal people with sense. Any more questions?

R69 It doesn't have to be untrue, retard. But she knows what her followers are likely. She doesn't need to call people groomers and pedophiles like she did in her first days, when she was still posting people's addresses. All she has to do is give her psycho followers the basics, and they'll do all the rest. She has months of experience doing that.

r68 You know what, I know this is a troll now, and I'm done arguing about this. What you're doing is called "concerned trolling" and you're probably doing it to make it seem like us in the gay community actually condone involving children in objectively inappropriate activities. Thankfully, I take comfort in the fact that all (not an exaggeration, literally ALL) of the gays I know personally and offline are 100% against involving children in drag in any capacity and influencing/encouraging minors (mainly gay kids) to take puberty blockers and surgically mutilate themselves to change their gender. And I know a LOT of gays.

You are probably doing this to make us look bad. Probably slithered over here from 4chan so that there's "evidence" of a bunch of gays online supporting this mess and I'm not having it. I'll be damned if the community is brought down because of this filth. Absolutely none of us support involving kids in drag. That is why Gays Against Groomers started. Because it's people like you who are giving the community a bad reputation and making shit harder for us by involving kids when the bulk of us are against it. Notice how none of this shit started with the kids until the Ts started taking center stage (no pun intended). I know what you're doing. You don't genuinely care about the community. It's actually the exact opposite and it's FOUL.

You're part of the problem.

Like you're doing here, R71. Inciting people to doxx this woman (R5)? Even kill her (R9)? God, you are a dumb ass hypocrite. Oh, and a TERRORIST too.

Omg

R72 LOL, the one concern trolling here is you, you 4chan pervert. You want me to believe the gay community IRL, as opposed to this sad trollpit of a website, would be siding with the homophobic Jan 6th insurrectionist Chaya Raichik over our own? You cheeky retarded troll.

[quote]siding with the homophobic Jan 6th insurrectionist Chaya Raichik

Yep. Keep going. Keep making it seem like being against involving kids in drag and grooming them to change their gender before they can legally drive is akin to supporting January 6th and somehow convincing yourself that you're the sane one.

I'm done with you. That was the proverbial last straw right there.

LO L @ R75. Lots of reach in your psychotic ramblings there, Pinocchio.

These kids in drag are at far more danger than the ones Chaya Raichik and theatrical concern troll r76 pretend to be worried about:

Putting aside Colorado, the sooner everyone denounces this child drag shit and child mutilation the better. Then what does Chaiya have? Making up shit about about abortion and sucking Trump’s dick. She does post quite a bit of fake or directed stuff, but she is also taking things from websites offering drag for kids and showing tik toks of teachers saying they have closets with binders and dildos in them for their students. The more we shame people that do that the less ammo and attention she has and she will not be able to paint the community as groomers.

Not that I needed confirmation that we've got Libs of Tiktok trolls shitposting here, but christ could they be more obvious.

Now that I'm calmed down a bit, no I don't wish violence towards them. I do however want them sued into the Stone Age. Or doxxed to the point that they're completely unemployable. Either works, really.

Btw, the Republican dyke behind Gays Against Groomers, Arielle Scarcella, has herself been accused of grooming by a trans man that she met when he was 12. She has never responded him. Because every right-wing accusation is a confession.

[quote]The more we shame people that do that the less ammo and attention she has and she will not be able to paint the community as groomers.

Or perhaps all that increased shaming will result in more gay people getting shot to death.

Funny how that stuff works.

In October, Chaya Raichik tweeted about a drag event, not because it was advertised for all ages (it wasn't), but because one of the queens was a "Satanist" (he wasn't). Sixteen masked Proud Boys showed up and yelled GROOMERS at patrons. No kids, no TikTok. But Chaya attacked the event anyway, because she likes the feeling of power. This is the person the maniac self-upvoter above says is neutral and "just reposts stuff".

These people are all sick Republicans, meaning the dregs of society and humanity.

There is nothing so bad, violent or savage that can ever happen to them that I wouldn't snicker and wish it were worse.

These animals better watch their backs because gays are able to buy guns too.

A trans man showed his dick r81?

Jaimee Michell is behind Gays Against Groomers. Not Arielle. Although r81 is now showing their true colors with the anti-lesbian attacks.

AGP say what?

Arielle is one rough-looking dyke.

[quote]Is Libs of TikTok a shit-stirrer? Yes, but the shit is not her shit; she is just stirring it.

R28 et al. always push this line, but it's not true. Dozens of screen grabs have been posted on DL that show LOTT posting something and adding their own content to it. The post at the OP is a great example! It's the VERY TOP CONTENT on this thread, and yet fucksticks like r28 want you to think that all LOTT does is repost content without comment.

They're lying to you.

Here's LOTT doxxing someone

LOTT spreading faked video to make it look like gays and drag queens were grooming kids

Proud Boys crash a Pride event in Idaho after LOTT tweets about it repeatedly

[quote]In the days leading up to the incidents in Idaho and California, Libs of TikTok, a social media account that aggregates and ridicules LGBTQ causes, had repeatedly posted about both the Coeur D'Alene event and drag queen storytelling events, including the one in Alameda.

Fucking vile bitch. Someone post HER pics already!!! (The real one.. not the unfortunate souls who share her name).

Stop upvoting yourself R80/R83. You don't have seven people who agree with you in the whole world let alone here on DL.

Very interesting how all the pro-Chaya Raichik trolls that were dominating this thread disappear as soon as more than one person started to push back on their propaganda. It's almost like they don't truly believe any of what they say, they just want to see how much homophobic trolling they can get away with on this suppodedly gay website.

Sometimes when they do that, they come back a few hours or even days later, r94. They leave until the sane people have gone away, then the bump the thread back up and start trolling again.

[quote] In addition, she has also posted address, phone number, and employment information of the people she targets so they get harassed:

But with the people in the cancel culture doing the same thing to people and businesses they don’t like, is it possible to seperate her from them other than they have different political leanings? People who have been cancelled would have their own horror stories of the campaigns to destroy them personally.

R96 Go fuck yourself, troll. Nazis don't show up on people's door after a blue haired adjunct professor posts about them online. They do when Chaya Raichik does.

She mostly posts real vids, then comments about it. Even though the comments can be bigoted, extreme, inflammatory, absurd, etc., it keeps her on the legal side. At least in the US. If she were posting fake stuff or saying literally, "Go hit this person!", then there might be some recourse.

"Some guy named Ballsack420 on Twitter once tweeted a Google Maps image of Lindsey Graham's house, which is why it's okay for Chaya Raichik to dox full names and addresses and suggest violent actions against those people."

Nobody gets cancelled anymore. The Trump years have broken that spell. Tucker Carlson can rave like a loon about white people being replaced and about gay teachers being threats to kids, and nothing happens to him. Not one sponsorship is lost. Now, when Chaya Raichik posts about people, they get harassed by masked Nazis and fired from their jobs. That's the reality now -- not cancellation from the left, but safety risks from the right.

I say it's past time to make her life a living hell. Go after her money. Keep the pressure on web hosts to end her accounts. Flood her life with gay porn. Fuck this evil bitch!

[quote]Tucker Carlson can rave like a loon about white people being replaced and about gay teachers being threats to kids, and nothing happens to him.

Why should something "happen to him", moron? Because you don't like his options? Waaaaaaah.

^opinions (not options)

Backing away slowly from the translunatic @ R101

Boston Children's Hospital mutilates children, especially children that might grow up to be gay, in an attempt to stop them from being gay. No country other than the US performs this kind of Mengele experiment on children, except perhaps the US's neighbour Canada. Even the Dutch, who are supposedly the Boston Children's Hospital's inspiration for the this barbaric practice, are backing away from treating children and youth in this way (and even they never transed kids to the same extent as the US is transing them).

R94, anyone who believes in giving puberty blockers to "gender nonconforming" children or that lesbians have penises and that gay men have vaginas is a homophobe.

How do you figure r101 is trans, r104? Nothing that he said points in that direction. You people think you can shepherd gay people into siding with homophobic extremists going after our livelihoods such as Chaya Raichik and Tucker Carlson just by howling to the moon about trans mutilation all the time?

You're not being subtle. You and the other 4chan troll scum on this thread are only making it more and more clear that trans hate is nothing but a right-wing propaganda weapon you think you can use to get us to lower our guard against the Republican party, precisely when it's been at its most homophobic. It's not gonna happen, in part because you're so obvious with this act.

[quote]Boston Children's Hospital mutilates children, especially children that might grow up to be gay, in an attempt to stop them from being gay.

Boston is very homophobic (it is the only place a well-travelled straight friend of mine has ever been called a "faggot"), and I can visualize homophobe Masshole parents taking their GNC kids there to 'correct the problem'. It happened across the pond at the Tavistock clinic where it was revealed that homophobic families was the common denominator among all the sample cases investigated.

I thought Chaya Raichik was a Modern Orthodox Jew, but she's actually a Chabad, a Haredi from a sect which, by the way, has a very serious pedophilia problem, according to the Jewish writer below.

"i mean chabad has a serious -- and a very real -- institutional "groomer" problem. child abuse. on the record, too. so of course this chabab freak is gonna go on and on about lib groomers."

Not a 'translunatic', r104. Gay man here who hates seeing people getting preyed upon. Get some help and shove your assumptions. You are probably one of those people who think they're edgy or entertaining but everyone probably avoids you. You have no friends except for the imaginary ones you think you have online in incel world. Are my assumptions correct, r104? You would never admit to it but I can tell by your post that you eat paste and harm small animals. You keep a mask by the door that you think scares children but you don't need it with your fucked up visage...all of this is easy to derive by your post.

Thanks, r107.

^Hahaha. Oh you poor deluded thing.

[quote]Is there really no possible legal recourse against Chaya Raichik a.k.a. Libs of TikTok

No there isn't.

This is the USA. She is within the law.

Get over it.

The sect to which Chaya Raichik belongs has a horrible record with child rape and cover-ups. Vice quoted a dissident Chabad rabbi as saying that 50% of boys from Chabad families are molested by religious figures. Chaya, it seems, comes from a rabbi family. I wonder if her dad wasn't a rapist, too. It's always projection with these people.

R113, you’re free to create a Chabad of TikTok account and go crazy.

what kinda fucking name is "Chaya" and "Raichik"? where is she from?

R115 From Russia.

Balenciaga has responded to protests about its ad campaign. The ads were shown on Tucker Carlson's show the other evening :

"Balenciaga issued an apology Tuesday for its new campaign that shows two young girls posing with teddy bears that appear to be wearing BDSM-style harnesses."

"Our plush bear bags should not have been featured with children in this campaign. We have immediately removed the campaign from all platforms"

"Eagle-eyed online investigators pointed out that one photo seemingly showed what appeared to be an excerpt from a U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld part of a federal child pornography law.

“We apologize for displaying unsettling documents in our campaign,” the company continued in its statement. “We take this matter very seriously and are taking legal action against the parties responsible for creating the set and including unapproved items for our Spring 23 campaign photoshoot. We strongly condemn abuse of children in any form. We stand for children’s safety and well-being.”

Thankfully we had Carlson speaking out about this filth.

Colorado Springs shooter identifies as ‘non-binary’ and goes by ‘they/them’

Thread closed.

Reason #89 why Gs avoid bars that are too TQ+.

Please refer to them as ‘Mx. Anderson Aldrich’

r117 Yoooo...

What. The. Fuck?

^ fuck yeah!!!

The BDSM bears were poor taste, but that court document? it's just bizarre and out of place too, but how "SHOE" on twitter was able to uncover what it was in the ad, what prompted him to focus on the barely readable text? Was he being tipped off? I think so. Balenciaga now says they will take legal action against the ad agency for unapproved setting, maybe they were set up by one of Kanye West's fans.

The non-binary thing is obviously a ploy to avoid a hate crime conviction. None of the people in his life know him as NB, abd at least one has described him as homophobic.

[quote]what prompted him to focus on the barely readable text?

Tbf, I happen to be one of those weird people that zooms in on pictures of open books or texts in photos not necessarily focusing on them just to see if I can identify the source material for my own entertainment.

For the record, from what I've seen, a lot of photographers like to show random pages from Moby Dick for some reason.

[quote]The non-binary thing is obviously a ploy to avoid a hate crime conviction.

Every statement of being non-binary is a ploy of some kind.

‘Mx. Aldrich’’s mug shot

Why do we have to be stuck in the middle of this war between the non-binary and the trans? Gay men have no dog in that fight.

Alejandra is a lawyer. Why doesn’t she go after LOTT?

She should be tied up and fucked by a fuck machine. After the dildo attachment has been replaced with a butcher knife.

Woah, r131.

Um, so this Balenciaga thing…maybe it should be its own thread?

Is it some super rich thing — only little people are perverts? Are they flexing their muscles by flouting human decency? Were they inspired by Eyes Wide Shut rather than warned? Is being a peeedo now a status thing???

I have questions.

R126, I do that with commercials. I read the fine print & study the backgrounds. It makes them so much more interesting.

For R132: time for that Q drop.

R131 the people that make comments like that seem to be people one job loss or breakup away from becoming a mass shooter themselves.

R133, this was an actual photo shoot. Not a conspiracy. You can see it with your own eyes. It made the news. It’s happening.

R134 Not even fucking close. 😁

Bump