At the height of her fame, Sinead was gorgeous, like a Disney princess brought to life.
And while her fame felt very fleeting, from The Lion and The Cobra to this moment of infamy, it actually lasted quite a while, about 2.5 years was it? Which is a long time for a character like her to be in the spotlight. Did she release her 3rd album after the SNL incident? And the documentary doesn’t even mention when she withdrew from SNL because Andrew “Dice” Clay was hosting which really kind of put his career on the skids. Sinead was quietly in our faces the entire time she was in the limelight and for a country like the U.S. that is SO misogynistic - deeply ingrained and without the slightest awareness of it then - this SNL moment was like the final straw of a wave of animosity that had likely been building for a while. Sinead had silenced her critics with the sheer force of her talent and surprising commercial success but the response to this - and the incredible, almost sudden reference for the pope (who wasn’t even beyond criticism by Catholics since Vatican II) - was definitely misogynistic. It was like suddenly everyone, certainly in the media, revered the pope over Sinead as if that was the totality of any possible options: Sinead v pope. I mean, Sinead shaved her head to de-glamourise herself (mostly - and, lbh, it was partly the making of her) and yet people still called her “baldy”, including Frank Sinatra, as if there was still something to take away from her, as if they couldn’t accept or couldn’t understand that was her choice. If she hasn’t presented herself like that, they would’ve vilified and attacked her even more, if that were possible because there would’ve been more to take away from her. But for all the sincerity of her protest against the pope, after several years in the global spotlight, it felt self-destructive as well, the act of someone who found fame to be exhausting and just wanted it all to go away. She certainly went out with a bang. But even this moment couldn’t eclipse the genuine, global pop moment - which went on for at least a year - of Nothing Compares 2 U, which existed at a time when such a thing was possible (I’m not sure it would happen now or penetrate as deeply). It just hit everybody right in the gut and in the heart, and both the song and the video not only demanded attention, it required your full and complete attention - it was arresting in a way that brought the world to a stand still and sort of gently massaged a wound that we all carry. It acknowledge that there is indeed irretrievable, unbearable loss. Neither Madonna or Beyoncé have ever come close to that.
I know they think they have their reasons but the denial by the Prince estate and Sharon Nelson of the right to use the song in the documentary, whatever aggro existed between Prince and Sinead, makes them seem incredibly petty, especially given the size of Prince’s catalogue. He was no one-hit wonder. For all that spirituality is a part of Prince’s brand, it seems petty, spiteful and cruel to someone who has already suffered their fair share of cruelty. But it’s also a denial that Sinead OWNS that song and it will always be hers forever more, long after Sharon Nelson is gone. Given the incredible royalties his estate racked in for decades on that recording, it not only seems petty but indecent, especially from the estate of an artist who used to walk around with the word “slave” on his face. I like to think if Prince were alive, he would’ve cleared its use, just out of respect for her artistry and achievement - after all, it wasn’t a hit for him; I’m sure his accountant could’ve made clear their comparative success with it with a simple spreadsheet.
I hope I Do Not Want What I Haven’t Got is still required listening. It’s a great album.