Master thespian Laurence Olivier once deemed the cinema was beneath him, thus taking the great Vivien Leigh away from movies during her peak years. Then later he decided he needed cash for his kids with Joan Plowright so took every offer that came his way, including terrible movies like The Betsy, The Jazz Singer, and Inchon. There's also this telly advert for Polaroid's then-new camera. What do you think of his performance in it?
Fabu!
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 15, 2022 9:32 PM |
At the time the camera was cool as hell and cost a fortune - so Olivier in the commercial seemed appropriate.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 15, 2022 9:34 PM |
The manner in which he says "camera" makes it seems like he was referring to a Velazquez painting, an object of precious craftsmanship.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 15, 2022 9:38 PM |
That was intentional R3. The original SX-70 was made of stainless steel and leather, and the collapsible mechanics were extraordinary — so in an era of plastic Polaroid cameras the craftsmanship was a huge marketing point.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 15, 2022 9:43 PM |
Lawrence Olivier stopped by the office the other day. He said I was the brightest and most vivacious worker he's seen in the office for years! I told my friend Tony about it at the coffee shop.
Go to 4:17 in the link.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 15, 2022 10:10 PM |
[quote] Master thespian Laurence Olivier once deemed the cinema was beneath him
That's an ignorant thing to say. Do you have ANY link for that assertion?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 15, 2022 10:13 PM |
Ugly......inside and out.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 15, 2022 10:17 PM |
[quote] taking the great Vivien Leigh away from movies during her peak years.
1. It was Selznick whose contract barred Vivien from starring in 'Henry V'.
2. Vivien starred in two of Britain's biggest movies in '45 and '48.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 15, 2022 10:19 PM |
Uglier than Danny Kaye?
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 15, 2022 10:20 PM |
R7 I can tell you're speaking from the prism of your own ignorance and bitterness.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 15, 2022 10:21 PM |
R2, It listed at $100.00, hardly a fortune.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 15, 2022 10:24 PM |
In the 70s, $100 was equivalent to like $700 today, R11.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 15, 2022 10:26 PM |
He was magnificent in A Little Romance!
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 15, 2022 10:29 PM |
[quote] Then later he decided he needed cash for his kids with Joan Plowright
The impetuous, passionate Larry married in haste to escape Vivien's farrago.
But he was obliged to 'repent at leisure' but he did fulfil his paternal duties.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 15, 2022 10:36 PM |
OP has stumbled upon a gem here. I find this commercial to be charming and elegant. Life seemed simpler back then. Leisure suits. Oldsmobiles. Kojak. Things actually made sense. Modern life with all its sophistication and choices can be so draining.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 15, 2022 10:38 PM |
R12, More like $500. December of 1975, I purchased three to give as Christmas presents at $100 each.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 15, 2022 10:40 PM |
Nice humblebrag, R16. Ooo, you were a big shot investment banker, handing out $500 cameras at Christmas like candy canes. Let me guess: now you’ve retired to sunny Florida and spend your days galavanting around in a Rolls Royce golf cart?
by Anonymous | reply 17 | May 15, 2022 10:48 PM |
Is this a camera I see before me?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | May 15, 2022 10:53 PM |
^ Larry may have 'chewed the scenery' if the part required it. But he was quite versatile.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | May 15, 2022 11:06 PM |
I smell a jealous bitch at R17.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | May 16, 2022 12:44 AM |
Olivier demanded that the Polaroid commercials never air in the UK.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | May 16, 2022 12:45 AM |
“The company first sold the SX-70 in Miami, Florida in late 1972, and began selling it nationally in fall 1973. Although the high cost of $180[3] for the camera and $6.90 for each film pack of ten pictures ($1,166 and $45, respectively, adjusted for inflation[4]) limited demand,” -Wikipedia
by Anonymous | reply 22 | May 16, 2022 12:46 AM |
It was marketed at people who bought Kodak Instamatics and the like, which sold at the time for $20 - $50. Even at $100 it was expensive for what it was -a consumer grade camera.
$100 in 1973 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $651.15 today, an increase of $551.15 over 49 years.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | May 16, 2022 12:48 AM |
Not at wholesale prices . . .
by Anonymous | reply 24 | May 16, 2022 12:50 AM |
Laurence Olivier was signed to that Polaroid deal while basking in glow of film "Sleuth" which was a huge success.
"Polaroid’s eagerness to sign Olivier was so intense that the company agreed to his demands: a $350,000 fee (which was unprecedented for an actor in television commercials), the promise not to broadcast the commercials on British television (lest anyone think he was slumming) and the budget-raising expense of filming in Paris (where his earnings would not be subject to Britain’s harsh tax laws)."
Overall both the ad campaign and camera itself were not the success everyone foretold.
Larry Olivier was stiff, formal and stuffy which totally went against grain of Polaroid cameras. There was supposed to be an element of fun and excitement watching pictures develop before your eyes and so forth.
Sadly also for Polaroid US economy entered an economic recession. As such people just weren't into spending what was a huge sum on many things including that Polaroid camera.
In end some heads rolled, Larry Olivier never did another series of television adverts, but took roles in several films that were far beneath his talent but paid well enough.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | May 16, 2022 12:56 AM |
To be fair Larry Olivier wasn't that only star actor from golden era of films, or stage that did adverts. By 1970's media was full of them hawking all sorts of products. For many it brought in very much needed income.
End of studio system, changing tastes in films, and in turn ushered in a totally new breed of actors meant many older ones were left scrambling to make a living.
Then consider even in golden age of Hollywood days British actors weren't paid lavishly, well not compared to Americans anyway. The earned decent living no doubt, but many came over to USA for film deals that paid far better.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | May 16, 2022 1:06 AM |
For record Liv Ullmann, and Christopher Plummer also did ad spots for Polaroid.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | May 16, 2022 1:09 AM |
He lost his dignity. He was a fine actor for a period, then got very hammy. Sleuth was his last good role, and it wasn't that great. I wish I could have seen him in the theater.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | May 16, 2022 5:03 AM |
How did he prepare for this role
by Anonymous | reply 29 | May 16, 2022 6:29 AM |
The same way he prepared for EVERY role - he put on a putty nose and spit a lot.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | May 16, 2022 4:57 PM |
[quote]Life seemed simpler back then...Things actually made sense.
In 1973? Like hell they did.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | May 16, 2022 5:06 PM |
Caught Sleuth on television last year, thought it was quite good.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | May 16, 2022 5:10 PM |