I just listened to an interesting four part podcast series on the history of disco, on a podcast called The Speed of Sound, which is all about music.
My takes on it are: first of all, I really found it interesting how until 1974, disco wasn't a type of music so much as an event, and at these events varied types of music where played; from jazz fusion, to world music, to obscure European songs, to obscure b-sides, just anything that would get people dancing, and dj-ing sprung out of these events. When I heard some of the music and the way the events where described, I almost got a FOMO type thing going on. This proto-disco stuff sounds much more my jam than what disco ended up being. It was underground, inclusive, and obscure.
By the first big disco wave 1975-76, I must say a lot of the songs didn't do it for me. Too much flute, and too upbeat. The stuff I enjoy tends to be stuff that has a bit of a darker edge and a funkier and more prominent bassline. But there were still some interesting songs. You could see how "factory" a lot of the stuff that was being churned out was.
There was a whole episode devoted to Saturday Night Fever, which doesn't interest me at all. That movie, from the bits of it I have seen, seems pretty miserable, plus, I'm a terrible gay and I don't like the soundtrack at all. However, after this, the second disco wave had some good stuff in it. I do like Chic, and I was really interested in the stories behind what inspired "Dance Dance Dance" and "Le Freak". Plus a lot of stuff that had a disco beat maybe but was kind of mixing with a punk sensibility was pretty cool. Oh and stuff like "I Feel Love" and "You Make Me Feel Mighty Real" are great; I think of them as more precursors to modern dance music than disco really.
The whole discussion on Studio 54 made me wonder: am I the only one who doesn't find that whole thing that interesting? It sounds annoying, more than anything. Taking something that was more underground and inclusive and turning it into an exclusive "you can't come in here" type thing doesn't do much for me, I'm afraid. I much preferred the ideas of the early disco get-togethers, much more my thing. Also, the people there sounding like they were so impressed with themselves, just makes me roll my eyes.
But I will say, as things got completely saturated in late 78-79, I could see why people might be pretty frustrated with the disco movement. There was a lot of cheap, tacky stuff being produced, and to the exclusion, it seemed, to a lot of other things which couldn't get radio play. The stuff that did get radio play around then seemed to be mainly horribly sappy love songs that made my teeth ache. I'll be honest, post-punk and new wave are more my thing.
However, as much as I am probably more a rock person than a disco person myself (though why limit yourself musically, at the same time?) the Disco Demolition stuff was so utterly pathetic. I had heard of it, but I didn't realise [italic]how[/italic] pathetic it was until I heard about it all happening. You think disco sucks? Totally your right. Burning and breaking albums and destroying property is sinister though, the racist and homophobic remarks awful, and honestly I think the kinds of people who got involved in that would all be considered incels these days. I feel bad for the musicians and producers who lost their livelihoods overnight. And that dj crowing about the death of the guy who wrote "The Hustle" was just soulless.
I do think it seems like disco had overstayed its welcome at the top and I think overexposure to it was bound to have people searching other music, but that behaviour just grossed me out.