Are we going to finally admit that Ringo was the sexiest Beatle?

Who ever though Ringo would turn out to be the hottest and best looking Beatle!

He also survived a serious childhood illness.

"you've become this good-looking Beatle"

He's at once the hottest and the coolest Beatle.

None of them were hot.

Well, he is still alive and he has aged better then Paul. Yoko is older and still looks ok

I'm not ready yet, OP.

Drunk, abusive, wife beater, deadbeat dad. Not sexy, deplorable.

^ That was John Lennon

Sexy? To Stevie Wonder perhaps

BDF

R8 Both of them were.

OP you accidentally left the word LEAST out of your headline.

@r11, I never heard that about Ringo

what about the other Beatle, the gay one; Rimgo

Even Pete Best who Ringo replaced was better looking than Ringo.

R15 - Older Pete Best looks like this.

No, thank you!

I'll stick with Ringo.

Yes, Ringo was the sexiest Beatle, for sure. Even back in the 60s, as a kid, I knew what I was looking at and why.

OP, we must march to the beat of a different drummer.

Of the women the Beatles either married or dated, Barbara Bach was the best looking, and Ringo married her - and they're still married 40 years later.

After 60 years of being famous, rumors are that Ringo can be short and testy with fans. I guess he's tured of being famous.

Maybe if he didn't have the big nose and big lips he would have been better looking.

McCartney was a cutie during the 60s.

The lead singer of The Zombies was much better looking than Jagger, Ringo, Lennon, Paul, Richards or McCartney.

How about none of them were sexy, let us admit that. Paul was the only mildly attractive one but had begun aging badly even by the 70s.

OP, none of them were ever anything close to sexy, handsome or even moderately attractive. Paul was the only one who wasn't downright ugly, but he has always looked like a chubby-faced Polish nun. John was downright hideous, Ringo is a giant nose stuck to a human body and George Harrison looked like the inspiration for the Frank Gallagher character in Shameless.

Also, none of them could sing, they were mediocre musicians and their songs are mostly sugary bubblegum with pretensions.

I used to take Heather out and she'd get legless

Still going strong and looking great at 81. He’s aging much better than Paul.

He's a great example of, homely when young...but grew out of it as he got older, and got better looking. He does look great.

[quote] Maybe if he didn't have the big nose and big lips he would have been better looking. McCartney was a cutie during the 60s.

Are you one of those unfortunate people who has no lips, face like a Muppet.

The Beatles were average looking, each the same level of average.

Never, OP! NEVER!

He was the ugliest one. You and Marge Bouvier Simpson are the only ones who think that, and look what she married.

George Harrison looks special needs

[quote]He was the ugliest one

The OP's claim is that he was the sexiest.

A man can be ugly and still be sexy AF. You've never heard of "sexy-ugly"?

I thought George was hot in his long hair Jesus period...Paul was midly cute in his prime...but Ringo has def aged the best.

I think they were all attractive. Ringo wasn't what I'd call a looker when young though. He definitely did get sexy during the 80s and 90s. John was not good-looking during that Sasquatch look he sported on the cover of Abbey Road. George was always handsome. Paul was cute, but I realized years ago that he wasn't really THAT cute.

R32, I think just the opposite. None of them were really attractive. Pete Best, on the other hand, was attractive.

I always thought Ringo was the handsomest. I love a guy with a big nose. It makes me think about what's in his pants.

Ringo was homely. Down right ugly in the 60's. George was probably the cutest, though fairly average at best. Ringo has had many MANY procedures over the years and now at 80 he looks pretty damn good for an 80 year old. Thank you Ringo's surgeon.