Adorable lips and eyes. Not standard looks but nonetheless.
Has held up a lot better than Paul.
Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
Adorable lips and eyes. Not standard looks but nonetheless.
Has held up a lot better than Paul.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | November 3, 2021 2:10 AM |
Who ever though Ringo would turn out to be the hottest and best looking Beatle!
He also survived a serious childhood illness.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | October 31, 2021 11:32 AM |
He's at once the hottest and the coolest Beatle.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | October 31, 2021 12:01 PM |
None of them were hot.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | October 31, 2021 12:02 PM |
Well, he is still alive and he has aged better then Paul. Yoko is older and still looks ok
by Anonymous | reply 5 | October 31, 2021 12:10 PM |
I'm not ready yet, OP.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | October 31, 2021 12:13 PM |
Drunk, abusive, wife beater, deadbeat dad. Not sexy, deplorable.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | October 31, 2021 12:15 PM |
^ That was John Lennon
by Anonymous | reply 8 | October 31, 2021 12:16 PM |
Sexy? To Stevie Wonder perhaps
by Anonymous | reply 9 | October 31, 2021 12:17 PM |
BDF
by Anonymous | reply 10 | October 31, 2021 12:20 PM |
R8 Both of them were.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | October 31, 2021 12:20 PM |
OP you accidentally left the word LEAST out of your headline.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | October 31, 2021 12:22 PM |
@r11, I never heard that about Ringo
by Anonymous | reply 13 | October 31, 2021 12:22 PM |
what about the other Beatle, the gay one; Rimgo
by Anonymous | reply 14 | October 31, 2021 12:39 PM |
Even Pete Best who Ringo replaced was better looking than Ringo.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | October 31, 2021 1:22 PM |
R15 - Older Pete Best looks like this.
No, thank you!
I'll stick with Ringo.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | October 31, 2021 1:26 PM |
Yes, Ringo was the sexiest Beatle, for sure. Even back in the 60s, as a kid, I knew what I was looking at and why.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | October 31, 2021 1:30 PM |
OP, we must march to the beat of a different drummer.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | October 31, 2021 2:45 PM |
Of the women the Beatles either married or dated, Barbara Bach was the best looking, and Ringo married her - and they're still married 40 years later.
After 60 years of being famous, rumors are that Ringo can be short and testy with fans. I guess he's tured of being famous.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | October 31, 2021 2:52 PM |
Maybe if he didn't have the big nose and big lips he would have been better looking.
McCartney was a cutie during the 60s.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | October 31, 2021 3:11 PM |
The lead singer of The Zombies was much better looking than Jagger, Ringo, Lennon, Paul, Richards or McCartney.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | October 31, 2021 3:33 PM |
How about none of them were sexy, let us admit that. Paul was the only mildly attractive one but had begun aging badly even by the 70s.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | October 31, 2021 3:38 PM |
OP, none of them were ever anything close to sexy, handsome or even moderately attractive. Paul was the only one who wasn't downright ugly, but he has always looked like a chubby-faced Polish nun. John was downright hideous, Ringo is a giant nose stuck to a human body and George Harrison looked like the inspiration for the Frank Gallagher character in Shameless.
Also, none of them could sing, they were mediocre musicians and their songs are mostly sugary bubblegum with pretensions.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | October 31, 2021 3:50 PM |
I used to take Heather out and she'd get legless
by Anonymous | reply 24 | October 31, 2021 3:50 PM |
Still going strong and looking great at 81. He’s aging much better than Paul.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | October 31, 2021 4:03 PM |
He's a great example of, homely when young...but grew out of it as he got older, and got better looking. He does look great.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | October 31, 2021 4:21 PM |
[quote] Maybe if he didn't have the big nose and big lips he would have been better looking. McCartney was a cutie during the 60s.
Are you one of those unfortunate people who has no lips, face like a Muppet.
The Beatles were average looking, each the same level of average.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | October 31, 2021 4:27 PM |
Never, OP! NEVER!
He was the ugliest one. You and Marge Bouvier Simpson are the only ones who think that, and look what she married.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | October 31, 2021 4:31 PM |
George Harrison looks special needs
by Anonymous | reply 29 | October 31, 2021 4:32 PM |
[quote]He was the ugliest one
The OP's claim is that he was the sexiest.
A man can be ugly and still be sexy AF. You've never heard of "sexy-ugly"?
by Anonymous | reply 30 | October 31, 2021 4:50 PM |
I thought George was hot in his long hair Jesus period...Paul was midly cute in his prime...but Ringo has def aged the best.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | October 31, 2021 5:43 PM |
I think they were all attractive. Ringo wasn't what I'd call a looker when young though. He definitely did get sexy during the 80s and 90s. John was not good-looking during that Sasquatch look he sported on the cover of Abbey Road. George was always handsome. Paul was cute, but I realized years ago that he wasn't really THAT cute.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | November 3, 2021 12:04 AM |
R32, I think just the opposite. None of them were really attractive. Pete Best, on the other hand, was attractive.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | November 3, 2021 12:10 AM |
I always thought Ringo was the handsomest. I love a guy with a big nose. It makes me think about what's in his pants.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | November 3, 2021 12:28 AM |
Ringo was homely. Down right ugly in the 60's. George was probably the cutest, though fairly average at best. Ringo has had many MANY procedures over the years and now at 80 he looks pretty damn good for an 80 year old. Thank you Ringo's surgeon.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | November 3, 2021 2:10 AM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!