Pity he isn't good-looking.
Also, did the NYT photoshop this pic to sharpen and highlight the Lt.? He's clearer than the other soldiers in front of and behind him, and his whites are whiter.
Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
Pity he isn't good-looking.
Also, did the NYT photoshop this pic to sharpen and highlight the Lt.? He's clearer than the other soldiers in front of and behind him, and his whites are whiter.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | September 28, 2021 10:20 PM |
Damn. That's what I call accommodation in capital letters. What happens in combat? Does he become the tallest target? Can it be camouflaged?
Did he have to cut his hair?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | September 26, 2021 5:26 PM |
Interesting article. Thanks r1
by Anonymous | reply 3 | September 28, 2021 7:55 PM |
he's good looking enough
by Anonymous | reply 4 | September 28, 2021 7:58 PM |
Yeah, and nice and hairy, too.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | September 28, 2021 8:29 PM |
Yeah OP here. He's better in the second pic, I agree. Sikh can be super handsome so I was thinking this one is just average. Not he's not fug.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | September 28, 2021 10:20 PM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!